Abstract
Among 30,000 new wearable device users (11.6 million person-days), self-reported alcohol consumption significantly declined over 72 weeks, with the daily probability of drinking decreasing by 5.8 percentage points (P<.001) and reductions across age and biological sex.
Introduction
Alcohol use is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality [1], and even low levels of consumption confer measurable health risk [2]. Despite growing awareness of this risk, alcohol remains among the most widely used drugs worldwide [3]. Although behavioral interventions can reduce intake, effects are often modest and short-lived [4], highlighting the need for scalable strategies supporting sustained, population-level reductions in alcohol use.
Wearable devices have become increasingly popular for continuous health monitoring, enabling real-time feedback on physiology and behavior. However, evidence linking wearable use to alcohol-related behaviors remains limited. A recent randomized controlled trial found that a wearable-supported behavioral program was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in alcohol use over 12 weeks [5]. To evaluate whether similar patterns emerge at scale and persist over longer durations, we examined longitudinal trajectories of self-reported alcohol consumption during the first 72 weeks of wearable membership in a large, real-world cohort.
Methods
Study Population
We studied 30,000 international adults (50.0% females) aged 18‐79 years who joined the WHOOP platform (WHOOP, Inc.) in 2023. Participants enrolled throughout the year and contributed up to 72 weeks of data, structured into consecutive seven-day weeks anchored to each participant’s join date. Quarters (Q1−Q6) were defined as consecutive 12-week intervals. Eligibility required at least 18 seven-day weeks with complete alcohol use reporting (≥25% of the observation window) [6], with additional weeks containing ≥3 entries also retained (Multimedia Appendix 1). Stratified random sampling by sex ensured balanced representation.
Self-Reported Alcohol Use
Daily alcohol use was self-reported through the WHOOP smartphone application via a customizable morning journal prompt asking users to confirm behaviors from the prior day (Figure S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1). Users indicated whether alcohol was consumed and could optionally report the number of drinks. Alcohol logging was not required for device use. Only days marked explicitly as “yes” or “no” were analyzed.
Members could also set personalized alcohol-related goals within the application, which could range from abstaining entirely to limiting drinking on specific days. Due to heterogeneity in goal types, goal setting was analyzed as a binary indicator (any goal vs none).
Statistical Analysis
Drinking frequency was modeled as the daily probability of alcohol use within each week using generalized linear mixed-effects models (binomial, logit link) with fixed effects for quarter, age, sex, season, total weeks contributed, and weekend proportion, with participant-level random intercepts. Estimated marginal means were computed by quarter and compared with Q1 using Dunnett-adjusted contrasts. Sensitivity analyses and modeling details are described in the Multimedia Appendix 1. All analyses were performed in R (version 4.2.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing) with statistical significance set at α=.05.
Ethical Considerations
Participants consented to their anonymized data being used for research purposes. The study protocol was approved by an independent institutional review board (Salus IRB #251121, Austin, TX). Participants did not receive compensation for their participation in this study.
Results
The final dataset included 11,651,827 person-days (1,776,673 person-wk). Mean age was 34.4 (SD 10.5) yrs, BMI was 25.1 (SD 4.0) kg/m2, and participants contributed a mean of 59.2 (SD 13.5) weeks (median 65 wk, IQR 18‐72 weeks), with an average of 6.6 (SD 0.9) alcohol entries per week (Table S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1).
The daily probability of alcohol use declined over time (Figure 1), from 23.0% (95% CI 22.7 to 23.3) in Q1 to 17.2% (95% CI 16.9 to 17.4) in Q6, an absolute reduction of 5.8 percentage points (95% CI −6.0 to −5.7). Results were robust in sensitivity analyses, including restriction to complete seven-day drink number reporting, where drinking volume decreased by 1.11 drinks per week (95% CI −1.15 to −1.07; Figure S2 in Multimedia Appendix 1).
Figure 1. Adjusted daily probability of alcohol use during the first 72 weeks of membership. Marginal estimates from a binomial generalized linear mixed-effects model are shown for six sequential 12-week quarters (Q1–Q6). Points represent model-based predicted probabilities that a logged day was a drinking day, and error bars indicate 95% CIs. Absolute changes versus Q1 (percentage points) and corresponding Dunnett-adjusted P values are derived from model-based contrasts. The model included fixed effects for quarter, age, biological sex, season, total number of weeks contributed, and the proportion of days in each user-week that fell on a weekend, with a random intercept for participant.

The baseline daily drinking probability was higher among males than females (P<.001), but the relative decline from Q1 to Q6 was greater in females (P<.001; Figure 2). Baseline daily drinking probability differed across age groups (Ps <.001). Progressively larger relative and absolute declines in drinking were observed with increasing age (Ps <.001; Figure 3).
Figure 2. Adjusted daily probability of alcohol use during the first 72 weeks of membership, stratified by biological sex. Estimated marginal means from a binomial generalized linear mixed-effects model are shown separately for females and males across six sequential 12-week quarters (Q1–Q6). Points represent model-based predicted probabilities that a logged day was a drinking day, and error bars indicate 95% CIs. Absolute percentage-point changes relative to Q1 and associated Dunnett-adjusted P values were derived from model-based contrasts within each sex. Models adjusted for age, season, total number of weeks contributed, and the proportion of days in each user-week that fell on a weekend, with a participant-level random intercept.

Figure 3. Adjusted daily probability of alcohol use during the first 72 weeks of membership, stratified by age group. Estimated marginal means from a binomial generalized linear mixed-effects model are shown separately for participants aged 18–39 years (n = 21,670), 40–59 years (n = 7,610), and 60–79 years (n = 720) across six sequential 12-week quarters (Q1–Q6). Points represent model-based predicted probabilities that a logged day was a drinking day, and error bars indicate 95% CIs. Absolute percentage-point changes relative to Q1 and corresponding Dunnett-adjusted P values were derived from model-based contrasts within each age group. Models adjusted for biological sex, season, total number of weeks contributed, and the proportion of days in each user-week that fell on a weekend, with a participant-level random intercept.

Both goal setters (n=13,298; Table S2 in Multimedia Appendix 1) and nongoal setters showed significant declines, though the relative decline was greater among non-goal setters (P<.001; Figure S5 in Multimedia Appendix 1).
Discussion
In this large real-world cohort of 30,000 WHOOP members, self-reported alcohol use declined over the first 72 weeks of membership, with both drinking frequency and volume decreasing across age and sex. These findings extend recent experimental results [5] by describing sustained reductions in alcohol use over 72 weeks in a large real-world cohort.
The observed declines may reflect increased awareness of health behaviors, heightened sensitivity to physiological feedback, or broader lifestyle changes after wearable enrollment [7]. Importantly, participants engaged in active self-monitoring through journal entries, a behavior shown to promote reductions in drinking [8]. Additionally, large-scale wearable-based analyses demonstrate that even moderate alcohol consumption disrupts cardiac autonomic regulation, sleep, and next-day physical activity [9]. Awareness of these consequences may reinforce behavior change. Notably, declines in drinking frequency were accompanied by reductions in volume, suggesting decreased frequency was not offset by increased intake on drinking occasions. Although causal effects cannot be inferred, the persistence of these changes over more than one year highlights the potential for digital health platforms to support sustained alcohol-related behavior change at scale.
Several limitations should be considered. Alcohol use was self-reported without standardized drink definitions, and participants were subscription-based wearable users who may be more health-conscious than the general population. The requirement for sustained reporting engagement (≥18 wk) may further limit generalizability. Although reporting frequency remained relatively high across quarters and sensitivity analyses restricted to complete reporting weeks and members with full 72-week follow-up yielded nearly identical results, informative missingness cannot be excluded. Without a control group, observed changes cannot be causally attributed to wearable enrollment or distinguished from secular trends [10]. Although statistically significant, absolute changes were modest, and clinical significance at the individual level cannot be determined. However, dose-response evidence indicates that alcohol-related health risks increase continuously with consumption [11], with no established safe threshold [12], suggesting even modest population-level reductions may carry public health relevance, particularly when sustained over time and observed across demographic subgroups. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate persistence beyond the study window. Despite these limitations, this study provides one of the largest longitudinal assessments of self-reported alcohol use to date, describing long-term trajectories of drinking frequency and volume over 72 weeks among new WHOOP members.
Supplementary material
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the technical assistance of the WHOOP Data Science and Data Engineering teams for their contributions to feature development and data infrastructure. We also thank the broader WHOOP employee community for their continued support of the company’s research initiatives. The authors used the generative AI tool ChatGPT (OpenAI) for language editing.
Abbreviations
- IRB
institutional review board
- Q1–Q6
Quarter 1 through Quarter 6
Footnotes
Funding: This work was supported by WHOOP, Inc. through salary support provided to authors GJG, WvH, FF, CC, DMP, JL, and KEH. No specific grant numbers are associated with this work. WHOOP, Inc. (https://whoop.com/) provided general institutional support but had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Authors’ Contributions: Conceptualization: GJG, KEH, WvH, FF, CJC, DMP, JL
Data Curation: GJG
Formal Analysis: GJG (lead), WvH and JL (supporting)
Project Administration: KEH
Visualization: GJG
Writing - original draft: GJG
Writing - reviewing & editing: GJG, KEH, WvH, FF, CJC, DMP, JL
Data Availability: The data and code that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to intellectual property concerns of WHOOP, Inc. Deidentified participant data and a data dictionary may be made available upon reasonable request to WHOOP (via research@whoop.com). Access will require submission of a methodologically sound proposal, approved by WHOOP’s research team, and a signed data use agreement. The timeframe for response to requests will be 4 weeks.
Conflicts of Interest: The study was funded by WHOOP, Inc., GJG, WvH, FF, CC, DMP, JL, and KEH are employees of WHOOP, Inc., and GJG, FF, CC, DMP, JL, and KEH hold stock options as part of their employee compensation, which represents a potential financial interest. All analysis was performed solely by the research and data science teams. Marketing, enterprise, and other non-research groups at WHOOP, Inc. had no role in study approval, data interpretation, manuscript preparation, or decisions regarding submission or publication.
References
- 1.Ortolá R, Sotos-Prieto M, García-Esquinas E, Galán I, Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Alcohol consumption patterns and mortality among older adults with health-related or socioeconomic risk factors. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2424495. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24495. doi. Medline. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Griswold MG, Fullman N, Hawley C, et al. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2018 Sep;392(10152):1015–1035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31310-2. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization; 2024. [16-12-2025]. Global status report on alcohol and health and treatment of substance use disorders.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240096745 URL. Accessed. [Google Scholar]
- 4.O’Logbon J, Wickersham A, Williamson C, Leightley D. The effectiveness of digital health technologies for reducing substance use among young people: a systematic review & meta-analysis. J Ment Health. 2024 Oct;33(5):645–673. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2023.2245902. doi. Medline. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fucito LM, Ash GI, Wu R, et al. Wearable intervention for alcohol use risk and sleep in young adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2513167. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13167. doi. Medline. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Turner-McGrievy GM, Dunn CG, Wilcox S, et al. Defining adherence to mobile dietary self-monitoring and assessing tracking over time: tracking at least two eating occasions per day is best marker of adherence within two different mobile health randomized weight loss interventions. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Sep;119(9):1516–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.03.012. doi. Medline. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grosicki GJ, Fielding F, Kim J, et al. Wearing WHOOP more frequently is associated with better biometrics and healthier sleep and activity patterns. Sensors (Basel) 2025 Apr 12;25(8):2437. doi: 10.3390/s25082437. doi. Medline. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carpenter SM, Yap J, Patrick ME, et al. Self-relevant appeals to engage in self-monitoring of alcohol use: a microrandomized trial. Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 May;37(3):434–446. doi: 10.1037/adb0000855. doi. Medline. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grosicki GJ, Robinson AT, Joyner MJ, et al. Real-world effects of alcohol on heart rate, sleep, and physical activity by age and sex. PLOS Digit Health. 2026 Mar;5(3):e0001284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001284. doi. Medline. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kerr WC, Lui CK, Ye Y, et al. Long-term trends in beverage-specific drinking in the National Alcohol Surveys: Differences by sex, age, and race and ethnicity. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken) 2024 Jul;48(7):1322–1335. doi: 10.1111/acer.15335. doi. Medline. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rehm J, Rovira P, Llamosas-Falcón L, Shield KD. Dose-response relationships between levels of alcohol use and risks of mortality or disease, for all people, by age, sex, and specific risk factors. Nutrients. 2021 Jul 30;13(8):2652. doi: 10.3390/nu13082652. doi. Medline. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Morrow L, Greenwald B. Spread the word: no amount of alcohol is safe! Gastroenterol Nurs. 2024;47(4):260–264. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000818. doi. Medline. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
