Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society logoLink to Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
. 1983;81:361–402.

Corneal transplant allograft reaction: possible predisposing factors.

J J Arentsen
PMCID: PMC1312459  PMID: 6375088

Abstract

A series of 869 PKs was reviewed to determine the incidence of allograft reactions in the presence or absence of possible predisposing factors. The average follow-up time after PK was 46 months. The possible predisposing factors studied were mild and severe preoperative vascularization, postoperative neovascularization, synechiae, and inflammation. Other factors considered were bilateral grafts, repeat grafts, and recipient's age. Although there was a significantly higher incidence of allograft reactions in the group with possible predisposing factors compared with the group with none of these, a cause-and-effect relationship could not be established for each possible predisposing factor when considered individually. Most of these factors were usually encountered in combinations of two or more, creating a large number of small variables with less statistical significance in predicting first and second reactions. The incidence of second reactions was similar in the presence or absence of these factors, approximately 25%. Only postoperative synechiae and neovascularization had some significance in eventually leading to permanent graft rejection. The incidence of allograft reaction was also similar among patients with repeat grafts and bilateral grafts. There was an insignificant tendency for the incidence of reactions to decrease in older patients, whether possible predisposing factors were present or not. Final visual acuity was comparable between the group having allograft reactions and the total group. The allograft rejection reaction continues to be the most important cause of graft failure. The role of donor-recipient antigen matching was briefly reviewed.

Full text

PDF
361

Images in this article

373FIGURE 2
on p.373
374FIGURE 3
on p.374
375FIGURE 4 A
on p.375
375FIGURE 4 B
on p.375
376FIGURE 5
on p.376
377FIGURE 6
on p.377
393FIGURE 9
on p.393
394FIGURE 10 A
on p.394
394FIGURE 10 B
on p.394

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alberth B., Leövey A., Balázs C. Anticorneal antibody examinations in human keratoplasty. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1974;190(4):341–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00407894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alldredge O. C., Krachmer J. H. Clinical types of corneal transplant rejection. Their manifestations, frequency, preoperative correlates, and treatment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981 Apr;99(4):599–604. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010599002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arentsen J. J., Morgan B., Green W. R. Changing indications for keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976 Mar;81(3):313–318. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(76)90246-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aronson S. B., Fish M. B., Pollycove M., Coon M. A. Altered vascular permeability in ocular inflammatory disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971 Apr;85(4):455–466. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1971.00990050457012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BASU P. K., MILLER I., ORMSBY H. L. Sex chromatin as a biologic cell marker in the study of the fate of corneal transplants. Am J Ophthalmol. 1960 Mar;49:513–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BASU P. K., SARKAR P., CARRE F. USE OF THE KARYOTYPE AS BIOLOGIC CELL MARKER IN A STUDY OF IMMUNOLOGIC REACTION ON THE CELLULAR ELEMENTS OF CORNEAL HETEROGRAFTS. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964 Oct;58:569–572. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(64)91370-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. BILLINGHAM R. E., BOSWELL T. Studies on the problem of corneal homografts. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1953 Jul 15;141(904):392–406. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1953.0049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BILLINGHAM R. E., BRENT L., MEDAWAR P. B. Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. II. The origin, strength and duration of actively and adoptively acquired immunity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1954 Dec 15;143(910):58–80. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1954.0054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Batchelor J. R., Casey T. A., Werb A., Gibbs D. C., Prasad S. S., Lloyd D. F., James A. HLA matching and corneal grafting. Lancet. 1976 Mar 13;1(7959):551–554. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90355-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Binder P. S., Chandler J. W., Kaufman H. E. In vitro demonstration of cytotoxic antibodies and their possible role in corneal graft rejections. Invest Ophthalmol. 1976 Jun;15(6):481–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bourne W. M. One-year observation of transplanted human corneal endothelium. Ophthalmology. 1980 Jul;87(7):673–679. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35188-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Buxton J. N., Schuman M., Pecego J. Graft reactions after unilateral and bilateral keratoplasty for keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 1981 Aug;88(8):771–773. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(81)34954-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. CASTROVIEJO R. Selection of patients for keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 1958 Feb;3(1):1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Capella J. A., Kaufman H. E., Polack F. M. Prognosis of keratoplasty in phakic and aphakic patients and use of cryopreserved donor tissue. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1972 Sep-Oct;76(5):1275–1285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chandler J. W., Kaufman H. E. Graft reactions after keratoplasty for keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974 Apr;77(4):543–547. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(74)90469-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cherry P. M., Basu P. K., Thompson G. A. The predictive value of leucocyte migration inhibition test in human keratoplasty. Can J Ophthalmol. 1978 Jul;13(3):194–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cherry P. M., Pashby R. C., Tadros M. L., Wolf A., Chipman M. L., Basu P. K., Dixon W. S., Hunter W. S., Thompson G. A. An analysis of corneal transplantation: I--graft clarity. Ann Ophthalmol. 1979 Mar;11(3):461–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cowden J., Kaufman H. E., Polack F. M. The prognosis of deratoplasty after previous graft failures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974 Sep;78(3):523–525. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(74)90244-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Culbertson W. W., Abbott R. L., Forster R. K. Endothelial cell loss in penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1982 Jun;89(6):600–604. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34754-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dohlman C. H. Corticosteroids in corneal surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1966 Winter;6(4):845–868. doi: 10.1097/00004397-196606040-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Donshik P. C., Cavanagh H. D., Boruchoff S. A., Dohlman C. H. Effect of bilateral and unilateral grafts on the incidence of rejections in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Jun;87(6):823–826. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90362-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. ESPIRITU R. B., KARA G. B., TABOWITZ D. Studies on the healing of corneal grafts. I. The fate of mucopolysaccharides as determined by S35 incorporation and autoradiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 1961 Jun;51:1281–1289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ehlers N., Ahrons S. Conjunctival lymphocytosis after corneal transplantation. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1973;51(2):179–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1973.tb03795.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ehlers N., Olsen T., Johnsen H. E. Corneal graft rejection probably mediated by antibodies. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1981 Feb;59(1):119–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1981.tb06719.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Elliott J. H. Immune factors in corneal graft rejection. Invest Ophthalmol. 1971 Mar;10(3):216–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. FAURE J. P. LES R'EACTIONS IMMUNOLOGIQUES DANS LES GREFFES DE LA CORN'EE. Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol. 1964 Oct-Nov;24:603–620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Foulks G. N., Sanfilippo F. Beneficial effects of histocompatibility in high-risk corneal transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Nov;94(5):622–629. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(82)90007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. HALES R. H., SPENCER W. H. UNSUCCESSFUL PENETRATING KERATOPLASTIES. CORRELATION OF CLINICAL AND HISTOLOGIC FINDINGS. Arch Ophthalmol. 1963 Dec;70:805–810. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1963.00960050807014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hughes W. F., Hurt A. C. Complications after corneal transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966 May;61(5 Pt 2):1171–1176. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(66)90240-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Inaba Z., Nagataki S., Tanishima T. [A time series analysis of allograft rejections after penetrating keratoplasty (author's transl)]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1980 Sep 10;84(9):1255–1261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Inomata H., Smelser G. K., Polack F. M. Fine structure of regenerating endothelium and Descemet's membrane in normal and rejecting corneal grafts. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970 Jul;70(1):49–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Inomata H., Smelser G. K., Polack F. M. The fine structural changes in the corneal endothelium during graft rejection. Invest Ophthalmol. 1970 Apr;9(4):263–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. KATZIN H. M. The ultimate fate of the graft. Am J Ophthalmol. 1950 Mar;33(3 Pt 2):35–38. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(50)91087-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kanai A., Polack F. M. Ultramicroscopic alterations in corneal epithelium in corneal grafts. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971 Jul 30;72(1):119–126. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(71)91600-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kanai A., Polack F. M. Ultramicroscopic changes in the corneal graft stroma during early rejection. Invest Ophthalmol. 1971 Jun;10(6):415–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kapichnikov M. M., Nogaller A. M., Levkoeva L. G., Lazarenko L. F., Saakov A. K. Primenenie metodiki immunotermistografii dlia obnaruzheniia gumoral'nykh antitel pri allotransplantatsii kozhi i rogovitsy u krolikov. Biull Eksp Biol Med. 1975 Aug;80(8):81–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Khodadoust A. A. Lamellar corneal transplantation in the rabbit. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968 Dec;66(6):1111–1117. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(68)90820-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Khodadoust A. A., Silverstein A. M. Induction of corneal graft rejection by passive cell transfer. Invest Ophthalmol. 1976 Feb;15(2):89–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Khodadoust A. A., Silverstein A. M. Local graft versus host reactions within the anterior chamber of the eye: the formation of corneal endothelial pocks. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975 Sep;14(9):640–647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Khodadoust A. A., Silverstein A. M. Studies on the nature of the privilege enjoyed by corneal allografts. Invest Ophthalmol. 1972 Mar;11(3):137–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Khodadoust A. A., Silverstein A. M. The survival and rejection of epithelium in experimental corneal transplants. Invest Ophthalmol. 1969 Apr;8(2):169–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Khodadoust A. A., Silverstein A. M. Transplantation and rejection of individual cell layers of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol. 1969 Apr;8(2):180–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Krachmer J. H., Alldredge O. C. Subepithelial infiltrates: a probable sign of corneal transplant rejection. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Dec;96(12):2234–2237. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060536013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kurz G. H., D'Amico R. A. Histopathology of corneal graft failures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968 Aug;66(2):184–199. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(68)92063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Leibowitz H. M., Elliott J. H. Edema of the graft following penetrating keratoplasty. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1968 Fall;8(3):697–727. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. MAUMENEE A. E. Penetrating autokeratoplasty of entire cornea. Am J Ophthalmol. 1959 May;47(5 Pt 2):125–133. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)78235-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. MAUMENEE A. E. The influence of donor-recipient sensitization on corneal grafts. Am J Ophthalmol. 1951 May;34(5 2):142–152. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(51)90019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. MUELLER H., MAUMENEE A. E. Considérations sur la maladie du greffon. Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol. 1951;11(2):146–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Manski W., Ehrlich G., Polack F. M. Studies on the cytotoxic immune reaction. I. The action of antibodies on normal and regenerating corneal tissues. J Immunol. 1970 Sep;105(3):755–763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. McCarey B. E., Kaufman H. E. Improved corneal storage. Invest Ophthalmol. 1974 Mar;13(3):165–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Moore T. E., Jr, Aronson S. B. Steroid therapy i penetrating keratoplasty. Trans Pac Coast Otoophthalmol Soc Annu Meet. 1967;51:29–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Olson C. L. Subconjunctival steroids and corneal hypersensitivity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966 May;75(5):651–658. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1966.00970050653014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. PATON R. T. Corneal transplantation: a review of 365 operations. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1953;51:581–668. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. POLACK F. M. Histopathological and histochemical alterations in the early stages of corneal graft rejection. J Exp Med. 1962 Nov 1;116:709–718. doi: 10.1084/jem.116.5.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. POLACK F. M., SMELSER G. K. The persistence of isotopically labeled cells in corneal grafts. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1962 May;110:60–61. doi: 10.3181/00379727-110-27422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. POLACK F. M. THE EFFECT OF OCULAR INFLAMMATION ON CORNEAL GRAFTS. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965 Aug;60:259–269. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(65)90926-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Paque J., Poirier R. H. Corneal allograft reaction and its relationship to suture site neovascularization. Ophthalmic Surg. 1977 Aug;8(4):71–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Patten J. T., Cavanagh H. D., Pavan-Langston D. Penetrating keratoplasty in acute herpetic corneal performations. Ann Ophthalmol. 1976 Mar;8(3):287–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Picetti B., Fine M. Keratoplasty in children. Trans Pac Coast Otoophthalmol Soc Annu Meet. 1965;46:153–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Polack F. M. Corneal transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol. 1973 Feb;12(2):85–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Polack F. M. Lymphocyte destruction during corneal homograft reaction. A scanning electron microscopic study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973 May;89(5):413–416. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1973.01000040415012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Polack F. M. Scanning electron microscopy of the host-graft endothelial junction in corneal graft reaction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972 May;73(5):704–710. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(72)90388-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Polack F. M. The pathologic anatomy of corneal graft rejection. Surv Ophthalmol. 1966 Aug;11(4):391–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pouliquen Y., Rocher C. Kératoplasties successives et maladie du greffon. Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol. 1975 Nov;35(11):847–864. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Silverstein A. M., Rossman A. M., de Leon A. S. Survival of donor epithelium in experimental corneal xenografts. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970 Mar;69(3):448–453. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(70)92281-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Smith R. E., McDonald H. R., Nesburn A. B., Minckler D. S. Penetrating keratoplasty: changing indications, 1947 to 1978. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Jul;98(7):1226–1229. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040078009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Smolin G., Biswell R. Corneal graft rejection associated with anterior iris adhesion: case report. Ann Ophthalmol. 1978 Nov;10(11):1603–1604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Smolin G., Hall J., Stein M. The afferent arc of the corneal immunologic reaction. I. Local response to bovine gamma globulin. Can J Ophthalmol. 1972 Jul;7(3):336–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Stark W. J., Opelz G., Newsome D., Brown R., Yankee R., Terasaki P. I. Sensitization to human lymphocyte antigens by corneal transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol. 1973 Sep;12(9):639–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Stark W. J., Taylor H. R., Bias W. B., Maumenee A. E. Histocompatibility (HLA) antigens and keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978 Nov;86(5):595–604. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(78)90174-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Stark W. J. Transplantation immunology of penetrating keratoplasty. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1980;78:1079–1117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Vannas S., Karjalainen K., Ruusuvaara P., Tiilikainen A. HLA-compatible donor cornea for prevention of allograft reaction. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1976 Mar 3;198(3):217–222. doi: 10.1007/BF00410714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Waring G. O., 3rd Selecting patients for penetrating keratoplasty. South Med J. 1981 Oct;74(10):1243–1248. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198110000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Waring G. O., Laibson P. R. A systematic method of drawing corneal pathologic conditions. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977 Sep;95(9):1540–1542. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1977.04450090062004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society are provided here courtesy of American Ophthalmological Society

RESOURCES