Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1986 Jul;46(1):37–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-37

Money versus pain: experimental study of a conflict in humans.

M Cabanac
PMCID: PMC1348254  PMID: 3746186

Abstract

Ten healthy human males volunteered to be subjects in an experiment in which they were to be paid to endure a painful sensation. This sensation was produced by isometric muscular contraction in the thighs. For each of six sessions the subjects received either a payment that was changed for each session (0.2, 0.5, 1.25, 3.125, 7.8125 French francs per 20 s) or a lump sum. At the beginning of a session, the subjects assumed a seated position against a wall, but without a seat, and the duration for which they could hold this position was the chief variable measured. Heart rate, blood pressure, and magnitude estimation of pain were also recorded periodically throughout each session. Pain was reported after a mean delay of 15 +/- 7 s (SE), and the magnitude estimates then increased linearly with time. The duration of maintaining the painful position increased linearly in relation to the logarithm of the increase in the amount of payment. Thus, utility of money decreased when pitted against pain.

Full text

PDF
37

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cabanac M., Leblanc J. Physiological conflict in humans: fatigue vs. cold discomfort. Am J Physiol. 1983 May;244(5):R621–R628. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1983.244.5.R621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hildebrandt G., Pöllmann L. Zur Frage der tagesrhythmischen Spontanschwankungen der Schmerzempfindlichkeit der Zähne. ZWR. 1973 Feb 25;82(4):176–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnson K. G., Cabanac M. Human thermoregulatory behavior during a conflict between cold discomfort and money. Physiol Behav. 1983 Jan;30(1):145–150. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(83)90050-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kahn J. F., Monod H. A study of fatigue during repetitive static work performed in two different segmental positions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984;53(2):169–174. doi: 10.1007/BF00422582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McFarland D. J., Sibly R. M. The behavioural final common path. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1975 May 15;270(907):265–293. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1975.0009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Smith G. M., Egbert L. D., Markowitz R. A., Mosteller F., Beecher H. K. An experimental pain method sensitive to morphine in man: the submaximum effort tourniquet technique. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1966 Nov;154(2):324–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wolff B. B. Measurement of human pain. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1980;58:173–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES