Skip to main content
Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society logoLink to Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society
. 2002;100:61–66.

The dehiscent Hughes flap: outcomes and implications.

George B Bartley 1, Marlene M Messenger 1
PMCID: PMC1358947  PMID: 12545678

Abstract

PURPOSE: The modified Hughes procedure is used to reconstruct full-thickness lower eyelid defects. A tarsoconjunctival flap from the upper eyelid replaces the posterior lamella, whereas a skin graft, a skin flap, or a skin-muscle flap restores the anterior lamella. The conjunctival pedicle from the upper eyelid is divided after vascularization of the reconstructed lower eyelid is judged to be adequate (traditionally, at least 3 weeks postoperatively). This study reviews the outcomes of patients in whom the conjunctival flap prematurely dehisced. METHODS: Eight patients were identified during a 15-year interval. The posterior lamellar defects ranged in size from 13 to 30 mm horizontally and 5 to 8 mm vertically. The average age at the time of eyelid reconstruction was 72 years (range, 60-84 years). Flap dehiscence, resulting in each case from accidental trauma, occurred between 1 and 11 days postoperatively. Surgical repair of the dehiscence was unsuccessfully attempted in one case; otherwise, the eyelids were permitted to heal spontaneously with the application of erythromycin ophthalmic ointment as the sole therapy. RESULTS: Although the result was satisfactory in each case, one patient, who had dry eyes from Sjögren's syndrome, required secondary surgery to treat mild lagophthalmos and lower eyelid retraction. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 122 months (median, 6.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: The ultimate functional and aesthetic outcomes after premature, traumatic dehiscence of a Hughes flap were surprisingly good, suggesting that elective division of the conjunctival pedicle in routine cases can be performed relatively soon after the primary reconstructive procedure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (279.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bartley G. B., Putterman A. M. A minor modification of the Hughes' operation for lower eyelid reconstruction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jan;119(1):96–97. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73821-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doxanas M. T. Orbicularis muscle mobilization in eyelid reconstruction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Jun;104(6):910–914. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050180144047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hargiss J. L. Bipedicle tarsoconjunctival flap. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;5(2):99–103. doi: 10.1097/00002341-198906000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hughes W. L. Total lower lid reconstruction: technical details. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1976;74:321–329. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Leibsohn J. M., Dryden R., Ross J. Intentional buttonholing of the Hughes' flap. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Jun;9(2):135–138. doi: 10.1097/00002341-199306000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Leone C. R., Jr, Van Gemert J. V. Lower lid reconstruction using tarsoconjunctival grafts and bipedicle skin-muscle flap. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 May;107(5):758–760. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010776045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lowry J. C., Bartley G. B., Litchy W. J. Electromyographic studies of the reconstructed lower eyelid after a modified Hughes procedure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Feb;119(2):225–228. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73877-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McNab A. A. Early division of the conjunctival pedicle in modified Hughes repair of the lower eyelid. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1996 Jun;27(6):422–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McNab A. A., Martin P., Benger R., O'Donnell B., Kourt G. A prospective randomized study comparing division of the pedicle of modified hughes flaps at two or four weeks. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Sep;17(5):317–319. doi: 10.1097/00002341-200109000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McNab A. A., Martin P., Benger R., O'Donnell B., Kourt G. A prospective randomized study comparing division of the pedicle of modified hughes flaps at two or four weeks. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Sep;17(5):317–319. doi: 10.1097/00002341-200109000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rohrich R. J., Zbar R. I. The evolution of the Hughes tarsoconjunctival flap for the lower eyelid reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Aug;104(2):518–526. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199908000-00033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society are provided here courtesy of American Ophthalmological Society

RESOURCES