Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1996 Aug;104(8):810–816. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104810

Reactivity parameters in structure-activity relationship-based risk assessment of chemicals.

J D McKinney 1
PMCID: PMC1469427  PMID: 8875147

Abstract

New approaches to the risk assessment process are needed that might be more definitive and satisfying to the scientific community, interest groups, and the public at large. This commentary examines an alternative approach that is based on understanding the relationships of chemical structure and reactivity properties to the toxicokinetic behavior of chemicals in biological systems. This approach is based on the likelihood that there is a limited number of triggering (reactivity) mechanisms by which chemicals can express their toxicity at the molecular level. The fundamental importance of electrophilic character of chemicals as a determinant of their critical molecular reactivities and interactions with biological material in the expression of toxicity is supported. Such an approach also takes advantage of the maturing field of theoretical/computational chemistry in understanding important molecular recognition and reactivity processes (both qualitatively and quantitatively) for chemicals that can underlie their biological/toxicological activity. A process that permits assessment of reaction equivalents delivered to biological systems may hold promise for grouping chemicals by common triggering mechanisms with clearly delineated toxicological endpoints.

Full text

PDF
810

Images in this article

811Figure 1.
on p.811
812Figure 2.
on p.812
813Figure 3.
on p.813
813Figure 4.
on p.813
814Figure 5.
on p.814
815Figure 6.
on p.815

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen M. E. Physiological modelling of organic compounds. Ann Occup Hyg. 1991 Jun;35(3):309–321. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/35.3.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakale G., McCreary R. D. A physico-chemical screening test for chemical carcinogens: the ke test. Carcinogenesis. 1987 Feb;8(2):253–264. doi: 10.1093/carcin/8.2.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakale G., McCreary R. D. Response of the ke test to NCI/NTP-screened chemicals. I. Non-genotoxic carcinogens and genotoxic non-carcinogens. Carcinogenesis. 1990 Oct;11(10):1811–1818. doi: 10.1093/carcin/11.10.1811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benigni R., Cotta-Ramusino M., Andreoli C., Giuliani A. Electrophilicity as measured by Ke: molecular determinants, relationship with other physical-chemical and quantum mechanical parameters, and ability to predict rodent carcinogenicity. Carcinogenesis. 1992 Apr;13(4):547–553. doi: 10.1093/carcin/13.4.547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brouwer A. Inhibition of thyroid hormone transport in plasma of rats by polychlorinated biphenyls. Arch Toxicol Suppl. 1989;13:440–445. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-74117-3_87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carlson R. M. Assessment of the propensity for covalent binding of electrophiles to biological substrates. Environ Health Perspect. 1990 Jul;87:227–232. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9087227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DeMarini D. M., Gallagher J. E., Houk V. S., Simmons J. E. Toxicological evaluation of complex industrial wastes: implications for exposure assessment. Toxicol Lett. 1989 Dec;49(2-3):199–214. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(89)90033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Delnomdedieu M., Basti M. M., Styblo M., Otvos J. D., Thomas D. J. Complexation of arsenic species in rabbit erythrocytes. Chem Res Toxicol. 1994 Sep-Oct;7(5):621–627. doi: 10.1021/tx00041a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dougherty R. C., Whitaker M. J., Smith L. M., Stalling D. L., Kuehl D. W. Negative chemical ionization studied of human and food chain contamination with xenobiotic chemicals. Environ Health Perspect. 1980 Jun;36:103–117. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8036103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fan A., Howd R., Davis B. Risk assessment of environmental chemicals. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1995;35:341–368. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.35.040195.002013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Franks N. P., Lieb W. R. Mechanisms of general anesthesia. Environ Health Perspect. 1990 Jul;87:199–205. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9087199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goddard W. A., 3rd Theoretical chemistry comes alive: full partner with experiment. Science. 1985 Feb 22;227(4689):917–923. doi: 10.1126/science.227.4689.917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Landers J. P., Bunce N. J. The Ah receptor and the mechanism of dioxin toxicity. Biochem J. 1991 Jun 1;276(Pt 2):273–287. doi: 10.1042/bj2760273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lucier G. W., Portier C. J., Gallo M. A. Receptor mechanisms and dose-response models for the effects of dioxins. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Apr 22;101(1):36–44. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9310136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Macdonald T. L. Chemical mechanisms of halocarbon metabolism. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1983;11(2):85–120. doi: 10.3109/10408448309089849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McKinney J. D., Chae K., McConnell E. E., Birnbaum L. S. Structure-induction versus structure-toxicity relationships for polychlorinated biphenyls and related aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Health Perspect. 1985 May;60:57–68. doi: 10.1289/ehp.856057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McKinney J. D., Singh P. Structure-activity relationships in halogenated biphenyls: unifying hypothesis for structural specificity. Chem Biol Interact. 1981 Jan;33(2-3):271–283. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(81)90046-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McKinney J. D., Waller C. L. Polychlorinated biphenyls as hormonally active structural analogues. Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Mar;102(3):290–297. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Monro A. What is an appropriate measure of exposure when testing drugs for carcinogenicity in rodents? Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1992 Feb;112(2):171–181. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(92)90185-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nebert D. W. Proposed role of drug-metabolizing enzymes: regulation of steady state levels of the ligands that effect growth, homeostasis, differentiation, and neuroendocrine functions. Mol Endocrinol. 1991 Sep;5(9):1203–1214. doi: 10.1210/mend-5-9-1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pohl L. R., George J. W., Martin J. L., Krishna G. Deuterium isotope effect in in vivo bioactivation of chloroform to phosgene. Biochem Pharmacol. 1979;28(4):561–563. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(79)90255-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Richard A. M. Role of computational chemistry in support of hazard identification (ID): mechanism-based SARs. Toxicol Lett. 1995 Sep;79(1-3):115–122. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03363-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Safe S. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and related compounds: environmental and mechanistic considerations which support the development of toxic equivalency factors (TEFs). Crit Rev Toxicol. 1990;21(1):51–88. doi: 10.3109/10408449009089873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Van den Berg M., De Jongh J., Poiger H., Olson J. R. The toxicokinetics and metabolism of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and their relevance for toxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1994;24(1):1–74. doi: 10.3109/10408449409017919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wachsman J. T., Bristol D. W., Spalding J., Shelby M., Tennant R. W. Predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Oct;101(5):444–445. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Waller C. L., Evans M. V., McKinney J. D. Modeling the cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of chlorinated volatile organic compounds. Drug Metab Dispos. 1996 Feb;24(2):203–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Waller C. L., McKinney J. D. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds: model validation and Ah receptor characterization. Chem Res Toxicol. 1995 Sep;8(6):847–858. doi: 10.1021/tx00048a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Weinstein H., Rabinowitz J., Liebman M. N., Osman R. Determinants of molecular reactivity as criteria for predicting toxicity: problems and approaches. Environ Health Perspect. 1985 Sep;61:147–162. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8561147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Whitlock J. P., Jr Mechanistic aspects of dioxin action. Chem Res Toxicol. 1993 Nov-Dec;6(6):754–763. doi: 10.1021/tx00036a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES