Abstract
AIM—The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability and reproducibility by physicians of upper lid measurements and to investigate the influence of clinical experience on the learning curve effect. METHODS—Both eyes of 22 outpatients were assessed for three basic measures of ptosis: marginal reflex distance (MRD) for upper and lower lids, upper lid skin crease (SC), and levator function (LF). Patients with variable eyelid positions were excluded. The patients were measured twice by a consultant and once by each of a clinical fellow, a specialist registrar, and a senior house officer in random order. Each observer was masked to their colleagues' results and followed a standard measurement protocol. Data were analysed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS—Consultant repeatability was high and consistent, the median difference between measures being 0 for each of the four parameters. Clinically acceptable reproducibility was shown in all measurements for even the least experienced physician and was particularly consistent for extreme observations. There was evidence of a learning curve effect. CONCLUSIONS—These results suggest that interobserver and intraobserver variability in assessment of upper lid ptosis using a standard measurement protocol is low and clinically acceptable when the technique of assessment is standardised.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.0 KB).
Figure 1 .
Bland-Altman plot of consultant repeatability for measurement of marginal reflex distance for upper eyelid.
Figure 2 .
Repeatability of consultant measures of levator function against time.
Figure 3 .
Reproducibility of skin crease measurement between senior house officer (SHO) and consultant with time.
Figure 4 .
Reproducibility of levator function measurement between clinical fellow and consultant.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beard C. Blepharoptosis: clinical evaluation and therapeutic rationale. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1970 Spring;10(1):97–115. doi: 10.1097/00004397-197001010-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karesh J. W. Diagnosis and management of acquired blepharoptosis and dermatochalasis. Facial Plast Surg. 1994 Apr;10(2):185–201. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1064569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leitenberg D., Eisen R. N., Goldstein J. M., Busque L., Rinder H. M., Stys P., Katz M. E., Gilliland D. G., Smith B. R. Natural killer cell lymphoproliferative disease associated with neuropathy. Am J Med. 1995 Jul;99(1):99–101. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)80112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Small R. G., Sabates N. R., Burrows D. The measurement and definition of ptosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;5(3):171–175. doi: 10.1097/00002341-198909000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]