Abstract
In many cells, ATP-sensitive K+ channels (KATP channels) couple metabolic state to excitability. In pancreatic beta cells, for example, this coupling regulates insulin release. Although KATP channels are abundantly expressed in the brain, their physiological role and the factors that regulate them are poorly understood. One potential regulator is H2O2. We reported previously that dopamine (DA) release in the striatum is modulated by endogenous H2O2, generated downstream from glutamatergic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-receptor activation. Here we investigated whether H2O2-sensitive KATP channels contribute to DA-release modulation by glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). This question is important because DA–glutamate interactions underlie brain functions, including motor control and cognition. Synaptic DA release was evoked by using local electrical stimulation in slices of guinea pig striatum and monitored in real time with carbon-fiber microelectrodes and fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. The KATP-channel antagonist glibenclamide abolished the H2O2-dependent increase in DA release usually seen with AMPA-receptor blockade by GYKI-52466 [1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine hydrochloride] and the decrease in DA release seen with GABA-type-A-receptor blockade by picrotoxin. In contrast, 5-hydroxydecanoate, a mitochondrial KATP-channel blocker, was ineffective, as were sulpiride, a D2-receptor antagonist, and tertiapin, a G protein-coupled K+-channel inhibitor. Diazoxide, a sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1)selective KATP-channel opener, prevented DA modulation by H2O2, glutamate, and GABA, whereas cromakalim, a SUR2-selective opener, did not. Thus, endogenous H2O2 activates SUR1-containing KATP channels in the plasma membrane to inhibit DA release. These data not only demonstrate that KATP channels can modulate CNS transmitter release in response to fast-synaptic transmission but also introduce H2O2 as a KATP-channel regulator.
ATP-sensitive K+ channels (KATP channels) belong to a class of inwardly rectifying K+ channels that are activated by a decrease in the ATP/ADP ratio (1–4). The resulting hyperpolarization lowers cell activity and energy consumption and thereby links metabolic state to excitability (3). Importantly, KATP channels also play a role in the regulation of secretory events. A classic example is KATP-channel-dependent regulation of insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells (5, 6). With normal extracellular levels of glucose, beta-cell KATP channels are open; when glucose levels increase, ATP levels rise, leading to KATP-channel closure, membrane depolarization, and consequent Ca2+-dependent insulin release (7).
The function of KATP channels in the CNS is less well defined. These channels are widely expressed in brain, with high levels in nigrostriatal dopamine (DA) cells and striatum (8–14). In contrast to pancreatic beta cells, however, KATP channels in many brain cell types are normally closed. For example, in DA neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta, KATP channels do not contribute to resting membrane properties, although membrane hyperpolarization occurs when these channels are activated by selective openers or decreased levels of oxygen and/or glucose (15–20). Consistent with these data, activation of KATP channels by specific openers or by metabolic inhibition decreases the release of several neurotransmitters, including DA (21, 22), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (15, 23–26), and glutamate (27–31). Together, these data have suggested that brain KATP channels may provide neuroprotection during metabolic stress. Significantly, however, these metabolically sensitive channels can be activated also under normal physiological conditions. For example, in the hypothalamus, KATP channels in glucose-sensitive and -responsive cells contribute to the regulation of systemic glucose homeostasis (32–34); in the brainstem, these channels control the excitability of vagal neurons (35) and medullary respiratory cells (36). Whether KATP channels modulate CNS-transmitter release under nonpathological conditions and what factors regulate channel opening, however, have not been established.
We reported recently that glutamate inhibits DA release in the striatum by a pathway that involves H2O2 generated downstream from the activation of glutamatergic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors (37). The discovery of this inhibitory action of glutamate resolves a long-standing conundrum about how glutamate modulates DA release in striatum in the absence of ionotropic glutamate receptors on DA terminals (38, 39). The mechanism of AMPA receptor–H2O2-dependent modulation is not yet known. Establishing this mechanism is important, however, because of the critical role of DA–glutamate interactions in movement control, cognitive processing, and the mediation of motivation and reward; correspondingly, DA–glutamate dysfunction has been implicated in Parkinson's disease (40, 41), schizophrenia (42, 43), and substance abuse (44, 45).
Preliminary studies suggested that the mechanism of glutamate–H2O2-dependent inhibition of DA release might involve KATP channels because the increase in DA release seen when AMPA receptors are blocked (and H2O2 generation is suppressed) can be prevented by the sulfonylurea tolbutamide (37). Consistent with this hypothesis, Krippeit-Drews et al. (46) have shown that exogenous H2O2 can lead to the opening of tolbutamide-sensitive KATP channels in pancreatic beta cells and thereby inhibit insulin release. On the other hand, it has been reported that tolbutamide can also inhibit K+ channels linked to dopaminergic D2 receptors in both DA and non-DA cells (22, 47–49). The experiments described here were designed to resolve whether KATP channels or another K+ channel mediates glutamate- and GABA-dependent inhibition of DA release.
Materials and Methods
DA Recording in Striatal Slices. All animal handling procedures were in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines and were approved by the New York University School of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee. Young adult guinea pigs (male, Hartley, 150–250 g) were deeply anesthetized with 40 mg·kg–1 pentobarbital (i.p.) and decapitated. Coronal brain slices containing striatum (400-μm thickness) were prepared as described previously and then kept for at least 1 h in Hepesbuffered artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) before experimentation (50, 51). After transfer to a submersion recording chamber at 32°C, slices were allowed a 30-min equilibration before stimulation; the superfusing aCSF contained (in mM): 124 NaCl, 3.7 KCl, 26 NaHCO3, 2.4 CaCl2, 1.3 MgSO4, 1.3 KH2PO4, and 10 glucose, equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2.
Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry was performed by a Millar Voltammeter (PD Systems International, West Molesey, U.K.); voltammetric procedures and data acquisition have been described (51). Carbon-fiber microelectrodes were made from single 8-μm carbon fibers; tip diameters were 2–4 μm (MPB Electrodes, London). Electrodes were calibrated in the recording chamber at 32°C after each experiment, and sensitivity to DA was determined in all experimental media used (37, 51). Release of DA was elicited in dorsolateral striatum by using a bipolar stimulating electrode on the slice surface; the carbon-fiber microelectrode was positioned between the poles, and the tip was inserted 50–100 μm beneath the slice surface (50, 51). The stimulus was a 10-Hz train of 30 pulses (pulse duration was 100 μs; pulse amplitude was 0.4–0.6 mA). Release of DA under these conditions is Ca2+-dependent and can be blocked by tetrodotoxin (51). Identification of released DA was based on characteristic DA voltammograms (Fig. 1B). Our previous studies confirmed that the evoked response in striatum is free from interference from other electroactive substances, including 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin), the DA metabolite DOPAC (3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid), and ascorbate (52).
Fig. 1.
Glutamate–H2O2-dependent modulation of striatal DA release is blocked by glibenclamide. (A) Glibenclamide (Glib; 3 μM) caused a significant increase in evoked DA release (P < 0.01, glibenclamide vs. control; n = 5). (B) Applied voltage waveform and representative voltammograms of DA obtained during DA calibration (DA cal; 1 μM) and at maximum evoked [DA]o during stimulation (10 Hz, 30 pulses) in normal aCSF (control) and in the presence of glibenclamide in the same striatal slice. Sampling interval was 100 ms; voltage scan rate was 800 V/s. (C) In the presence of glibenclamide, the usual effects of MCS (1 mM), GYKI-52466 (GYKI; 50 μM), and picrotoxin (100 μM) on DA release were prevented (P > 0.05, each agent vs. glibenclamide alone; n = 5). Data are given as mean ± SEM, illustrated as percentage of same-site control. Solid bars indicate the stimulation period.
Drug and Chemicals. Glibenclamide, (–)-sulpiride, 5-hydroxydecanoic acid (5-HD), mercaptosuccinic acid (MCS), 1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine hydrochloride (GYKI-52466), picrotoxin, and all components of aCSF and Hepes-aCSF were obtained from Sigma. Tertiapin was obtained from Peptide Institute (Osaka); diazoxide and cromakalim were obtained from Tocris Cookson (Ellisville, MO). All experimental solutions were made immediately before use. Stock solutions of glibenclamide were made in ethanol (0.02% final concentration in aCSF); diazoxide and cromakalim stock solutions were made in DMSO (0.01% final concentration in aCSF). Control data for these agents were obtained in vehicle; at the concentrations used, neither ethanol nor DMSO altered evoked DA release compared with that in aCSF alone.
Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis. Pharmacological inhibition of glutathione peroxidase by MCS inhibits H2O2 metabolism and can thereby increase H2O2 availability (53, 54). We have used MCS previously as a tool to reveal the role of endogenous H2O2 generated during pulse-train stimulation in DA-release modulation (37, 55). Evoked DA release in the presence of MCS is significantly lower than control release in aCSF alone; the specific involvement of H2O2 was confirmed by the reversal of this release suppression by catalase in the continued presence of MCS (37). Moreover, generation of modulatory H2O2 requires AMPA-receptor activation: MCS has no effect on DA release when AMPA receptors were blocked with GYKI-52466. Conversely, modulation of DA release by GYKI-52466 or by the GABA type A (GABAA) receptor antagonist picrotoxin is prevented by catalase, demonstrating that H2O2 is required for DA-release regulation by endogenous glutamate and GABA (37).
In the present experiments, therefore, we used either MCS (1 mM) or GYKI-52466 (50 μM) (37) to screen the ability of specific K+ blockers and openers to alter H2O2-dependent modulation of DA release. Key findings were confirmed by testing an agent against MCS, GYKI-52466, and picrotoxin (100 μM) (37) individually. In all experiments, the interval between stimulation trains was 10 min. Only slices with at least three consistent evoked increases in extracellular DA concentration ([DA]o) under control conditions were used for these experiments; this criterion excluded ≈5% of slices tested. After consistent DA release was confirmed, a blocker or opener was superfused for 30–40 min, and continual recording of evoked [DA]o was performed; MCS, GYKI-52466, or picrotoxin was then applied in the continued presence of the test agent.
Data are given as mean ± SEM (n = number of slices) and illustrated as percentage of control. For each slice, the last three control records obtained before drug application were averaged and the mean peak [DA]o was taken as 100% for that slice. For studies in which the effect of a given K+-channel agent was tested for efficacy against DA-release modulation by MCS, GYKI-52466, and picrotoxin, statistical comparisons were made by using pooled control and test agent data. In all experiments, differences in peak evoked [DA]o between conditions were assessed by using unpaired Student's t tests and were considered to be significant when P < 0.05.
Results
Glibenclamide Prevents AMPA Receptor–H2O2-Dependent Inhibition of DA Release. In various cell types, including neurons and pancreatic beta cells, exogenous H2O2 causes activation of a K+ channel that results in membrane hyperpolarization that can be prevented by the nonspecific K+ channel blocker, barium (Ba2+), or the sulfonylurea, tolbutamide (46, 56). In pilot studies, Ba2+ (100 μM) prevented the suppression of evoked DA release (10 Hz, 30 pulses) by exogenous H2O2 (1.5 mM) and by MCS (1 mM) applied sequentially in a given slice (n = 3; data not shown). These findings indicated a common mechanism involving K+ channels for both exogenous and endogenous H2O2. We found also that tolbutamide (200 μM) prevented inhibition of DA release by endogenous H2O2 in striatum (37).
Here we tested the suggested involvement of KATP channels by using a more potent KATP-channel blocker, glibenclamide. Consistent with a role for KATP channels, glibenclamide (3 μM) (6, 57) caused a 60% increase in evoked [DA]o from a control level of 2.0 ± 0.1 μM (P < 0.01; n = 5) (Fig. 1 A). Identification and quantification of evoked DA release were made by comparing voltammograms obtained during local stimulation in striatum with voltammograms recorded during subsequent DA calibration (Fig. 1B). In the continued presence of glibenclamide, the usual suppression of DA release in MCS was prevented completely (P > 0.05; n = 5) (Fig. 1C). Modulation of DA release by AMPA- and GABAA-receptor activation was also blocked: neither GYKI-52466 nor picrotoxin altered evoked [DA]o in the presence of glibenclamide (P > 0.05; n = 5 for GYKI-52466 or picrotoxin) (Fig. 1C). In paired controls, MCS caused a 40% decrease in evoked [DA]o, whereas GYKI-52466 induced a 100% increase in DA release and picrotoxin caused a 50% decrease (data not shown); these control responses were similar to those reported (37, 55).
Lack of Involvement of D2 Receptors or G Protein-Activated K+ Channels. Several reports have suggested a G protein-coupled interaction between KATP channels and D2 receptors in the nigrostriatal pathway (22, 47, 48, 58). Most relevant for the present studies, both tolbutamide and glibenclamide have been shown to inhibit D2-receptor-activated K+ channels and the resultant membrane hyperpolarization (47, 48). We therefore examined whether such interactions might underlie the prevention of DA-release modulation by these sulfonylureas. The possible involvement of D2 receptors was tested by using the specific D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (1 μM) (41). Consistent with previous findings (51, 59), sulpiride caused a marked increase (80%) in maximum evoked [DA]o (Fig. 2A) (P < 0.001; n = 6). However, the D2-receptor blockade did not prevent the expected inhibition of DA release that accompanies glutathione peroxidase inhibition by MCS (P < 0.001, sulpiride + MCS vs. sulpiride alone; n = 6) (Fig. 2 A).
Fig. 2.
Glutamate–H2O2-dependent inhibition of striatal DA release does not involve D2 receptors or G protein-coupled K+ channels. (A) Sulpiride (1 μM), a D2-receptor antagonist, increased evoked [DA]o in striatum (P < 0.001, sulpiride vs. control; n = 6). The usual suppression of pulse-train-evoked DA release seen in MCS (1 mM) persisted in the presence of sulpiride (P < 0.001, sulpiride plus MCS vs. sulpiride; n = 6). (B) Blockade of G protein-coupled K+ channels with tertiapin (100 nM to 1 μM) caused a significant increase in striatal DA release (P < 0.001, tertiapin vs. control; n = 7) but did not alter the usual increase in evoked [DA]o seen with AMPA receptor blockade by GYKI-52466 (GYKI; 50 μM) (P < 0.001, tertiapin + GYKI vs. tertiapin; n = 7). Solid bars indicate the stimulation period.
We then tested the possible involvement of other G protein-coupled K+ channels by using tertiapin (10 nM to 1 μM) (60, 61), which is a general inhibitor of G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels (62). The efficacy of tertiapin at each concentration tested was indicated by an increase in evoked [DA]o. The lowest concentration (10 nM) produced an ≈50% increase in evoked [DA]o but did not alter the further increase in evoked [DA]o induced by GYKI-52466 (data not shown). A maximum effect of tertiapin was seen with 100 nM; no further increase was seen with 300 nM or 1 μM. The mean increase in evoked [DA]o for pooled data for 100 nM to 1 μM tertiapin was 62% (P < 0.001; n = 7) (Fig. 2B). Even with these supramaximal concentrations of tertiapin, the usual effect of AMPA-receptor blockade persisted (P < 0.001, tertiapin + GYKI-52466 vs. tertiapin alone; n = 7) (Fig. 2B). Together, these data show that neither D2-receptor-linked K+ channels nor other G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels contribute to the modulation of DA release by endogenously generated H2O2. They confirm also that the effects of glibenclamide and tolbutamide in this experimental paradigm are KATP-channel specific.
H2O2-Dependent Inhibition of DA Release Does Not Involve Mitochondrial KATP Channels. Glibenclamide and tolbutamide can inhibit mitochondrial KATP (mitKATP) channels, as well as those in the plasma membrane (63, 64). To distinguish the site of KATP-channel activation by H2O2, we tested the efficacy of 5-HD, a selective inhibitor of mitKATP-channel function (65). Like the sulfonylureas, 5-HD (100 μM) (66) caused an increase (43%) in peak [DA]o (P < 0.01; n = 4) (Fig. 3). However, 5-HD did not prevent the usual increase in DA release caused by blockade of AMPA receptors by GYKI-52466 (P < 0.001, 5-HD + GYKI-52466 vs. 5-HD alone; n = 4) (Fig. 3), which demonstrated a lack of involvement of mitKATP channels in glutamate–H2O2-dependent inhibition.
Fig. 3.
mitKATP channels do not mediate glutamate–H2O2-dependent modulation of striatal DA release. The mitKATP-channel inhibitor 5-HD (100 μM) caused an increase in evoked [DA]o (P < 0.01, 5-HD vs. control; n = 4). However, 5-HD had no effect on the further increase in DA release that accompanied AMPA-receptor blockade by GYKI-52466 (GYKI; 50 μM) (P < 0.001, 5-HD + GYKI vs. 5-HD; n = 4). Solid bars indicate the stimulation period.
Effects of Selective KATP Channel Openers on DA Release. KATP channels are multimeric proteins containing two distinct subunits, which are an inwardly rectifying pore-forming subunit (Kir6.1 or Kir6.2) and a sulfonylurea receptor subunit 1 or 2 (SUR1/2) (7, 67–69). In brain, most channels contain Kir6.2 (70, 71). SUR1- and SUR2-based channels can be distinguished by their differential sensitivity to KATP-channel openers; preferential selectivity of diazoxide corresponds to SUR1 and selectivity of cromakalim corresponds to SUR2 (72, 73). We therefore compared the efficacy of these openers on evoked DA release. Activation of KATP channels by either diazoxide-suppressed (30 μM) (74) or cromakalim-suppressed (30 μM) (72) DA release, with a 42% decrease in peak [DA]o in diazoxide (P < 0.01; n = 5) and a 32% decrease in peak [DA]o in cromakalim (P < 0.01; n = 5) (Fig. 4). Diazoxide completely prevented the usual effects of MCS, GYKI-52466, and picrotoxin on DA release (Fig. 4 Upper; P > 0.05 vs. diazoxide alone for each agent; n = 5 for each). In sharp contrast, cromakalim did not alter the expected effect of any of these agents (Fig. 4 Lower): inhibition of glutathione peroxidase by MCS in the presence of cromakalim resulted in a further decrease in evoked [DA]o (P < 0.05, cromakalim + MCS vs. cromakalim alone; n = 5). GYKI-52466 caused the usual increase in evoked [DA]o (P < 0.05; n = 5), and PTX caused the usual decrease (P < 0.05; n = 5). These data specifically implicate H2O2-sensitive SUR1-containing KATP channels in the modulation of striatal DA release by glutamate and GABA.
Fig. 4.
Differential effects of KATP-channel openers on striatal DA release. (Upper) Diazoxide (30 μM), a SUR1-selective KATP-channel opener, decreased evoked [DA]o in striatum (P < 0.01, diazoxide vs. control; n = 5). Moreover, diazoxide abolished the effects of MCS, GYKI-52466 (GYKI), and picrotoxin (PTX) on DA release (P > 0.05, diazoxide + each agent vs. diazoxide; n = 5). (Lower) Cromakalim (30 μM), a SUR2-selective KATP-channel opener, also caused a significant decrease in evoked [DA]o (P < 0.01, cromakalim vs. control; n = 5) but did not alter the usual pattern of DA-release modulation seen with MCS, GYKI-52466, and PTX (P < 0.05, cromakalim + each agent vs. cromakalim; n = 5). Solid bars indicate the stimulation period.
Discussion
The data reported here demonstrate that KATP channels can modulate CNS transmitter release as a response to fast synaptic transmission by glutamate and GABA. Additionally, these studies show that H2O2 is the second messenger that mediates this response. Exogenous H2O2 has been shown to lead to KATP-channel opening in beta cells and subsequent inhibition of insulin release (36); however, a role for endogenous H2O2 in KATP-channel regulation has not been reported previously. The normally closed state of KATP channels in the CNS and their known activation by deprivation of oxygen and/or glucose have suggested that a primary function is to provide neuroprotection during ischemia or other brain injury (8, 17, 27, 29, 31, 75–77). However, these channels also have significant roles in normal physiology, including maintenance of glucose homeostasis by glucose-sensing cells of the hypothalamus (32–34) and regulation of excitability in metabolically sensitive cells of the vagal and respiratory centers (35, 36). The present studies reveal a regulatory function for KATP channels that requires H2O2 as a key signaling molecule.
Are D2 Receptors Involved? Our previous studies with tolbutamide suggested that sulfonylurea-sensitive K+ channels mediate AMPA-receptor–H2O2-dependent modulation of DA release (37). This finding was confirmed by the present results with glibenclamide (Fig. 1). These data alone fall short of proving KATP-channel involvement, however, because of the potential interaction between sulfonylureas and D2 receptors, which activate G protein-coupled K+ channels (78, 79). In the substantia nigra pars compacta, tolbutamide has been shown to reverse D2-autoreceptor-mediated inhibition of DA neurons (47), and in the striatum, both tolbutamide and glibenclamide can antagonize D2-mediated inhibition in non-DA neurons (48). These and other results have suggested a link between D2 receptors and KATP channels in which signal transduction is mediated by G proteins (22, 47–49, 58), although such coupling is not seen under all experimental conditions (80, 81). The H2O2-sensitive KATP channels described in the present report appear to be distinct from striatal KATP channels examined previously. In the studies of Lin et al. (48), for example, tolbutamide was 10- to 100-fold more potent than glibenclamide in blocking D2-receptor-mediated inhibition in striatal neurons. This relative potency is opposite to that required for prevention of AMPA-receptor–H2O2-mediated inhibition of DA release: glibenclamide was effective at 3 μM (Fig. 1), whereas 200 μM tolbutamide was required (37).
Moreover, we found no evidence for the involvement of D2 receptors or G protein coupling in the modulation of striatal DA release by H2O2-sensitive KATP channels. Like tolbutamide or glibenclamide, the D2 antagonist sulpiride caused a significant increase in evoked [DA]o; unlike the sulfonylureas, however, sulpiride did not alter the usual decrease in DA release when H2O2 availability was increased by MCS (Fig. 2 A). Similarly, tertiapin, a G protein-activated, inwardly rectifying K+-channel inhibitor, caused a significant increase in evoked [DA]o but had no effect AMPA-receptor-dependent modulation of DA release (Fig. 2B). Thus, these data demonstrate the independence of H2O2-sensitive KATP channels and D2-receptor-linked or other G protein-coupled K+ channels in striatum.
Which KATP Channels Are Involved in DA-Release Modulation by H2O2? Recent evidence suggests that endogenous H2O2 can activate mitKATP channels in cardiac myocytes during ischemic preconditioning (82). A necessary experiment, therefore, was to assess the role of mitKATP channels in glutamate–H2O2-dependent modulation of striatal DA release. This assessment required the use of a selective mitKATP-channel blocker, 5-HD (65), because neither glibenclamide nor tolbutamide can distinguish between mitKATP channels and those in plasma membranes (63, 64). Interestingly, 5-HD alone caused an increase in evoked [DA]o; this finding suggests some involvement of mitKATP channels in DA-release regulation (Fig. 3). One possible explanation for this increase is that 5-HD caused a decrease in mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species, which can accompany a mitKATP-channel blockade (83); mitochondrial respiration is a significant source of cellular reactive oxygen species, including H2O2 (84). Despite this effect of 5-HD under control conditions, this mitKATP-channel blocker did not prevent a further increase in evoked [DA]o when AMPA receptors were blocked, demonstrating that mitKATP channels are not involved in the dynamic modulation of DA release by H2O2.
Final confirmation that KATP channels are required for DA-release modulation by H2O2, glutamate, and GABA was provided by the loss of efficacy of MCS, GYKI-52466, and picrotoxin when KATP channels had already been opened by diazoxide (Fig. 4). Together with the inability of SUR2-selective cromakalim to alter H2O2-dependent DA modulation by these agents, this result specifically implicates SUR1-based KATP channels (71, 72). These findings do not exclude other roles for SUR2-based channels in DA modulation because cromakalim, like diazoxide, did cause a significant decrease in control-evoked [DA]o (Fig. 4). However, the data indicate that the KATP channels targeted by AMPA-receptor-dependent H2O2 in striatum contain SUR1 subunits. The question of whether the effect of H2O2 is direct or mediated by additional pathways [e.g., by altering ATP levels as exogenous H2O2 does in pancreatic beta cells (46)] remains open.
The most logical location for H2O2-sensitive KATP channels to modulate striatal DA release is on the presynaptic membrane of DA release sites. Such localization is supported by the high expression of sulfonylurea binding sites in DA cells of the substantia nigra pars compacta (8, 10, 11, 13), which project to dorsal striatum (85). Moreover, a majority of KATP channels in DA cells express Kir6.2 subunits combined with SUR1 rather than SUR2 subunits because of the greater metabolic sensitivity of SUR1- vs. SUR2-based channels (86). The most likely site of AMPA-receptor-dependent H2O2 generation, on the other hand, is in medium spiny neurons, given the absence of AMPA and GABAA receptors on DA terminals and the abundance of these receptors on spiny neurons (37–39, 87). Although KATP channels are also expressed in medium spiny neurons (88), the present findings argue against significant involvement of those channels. We have already shown that activation of inhibitory GABAA receptors opposes AMPA-receptor-dependent H2O2 generation and thereby increases DA release (37). KATP-channel opening in medium spiny neurons would be expected to have a similar effect by opposing AMPA-receptor-dependent excitation and H2O2 generation. Thus, if KATP channels in medium spiny neurons were the primary targets of H2O2, one would expect enhanced DA release in the presence of KATP openers and suppressed DA release in the presence of KATP-channel blockers. However, the opposite behaviors were observed (Figs. 1 and 4), consistent with direct presynaptic regulation of DA release. Together, these data support a model of striatal DA-release regulation (37) in which AMPA-receptor-dependent H2O2 diffuses from postsynaptic sites in medium spiny neurons to inhibit DA release by activating H2O2-sensitive KATP channels in presynaptic DA terminals.
Conclusions
The data reported here demonstrate a functional role for KATP channels in the regulation of transmitter release in dorsal striatum. Moreover, they reveal that these channels are normally activated by H2O2 generated downstream from AMPA-receptor activation and modulated by GABAA-receptor input. The specific KATP channels involved are plasmalemmal SUR1-based channels, with probable location on DA axon terminals. Given that endogenous H2O2 also inhibits synaptic DA release in ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) and somatodendritic DA release in the substantia nigra pars compacta (55), we anticipate that KATP channels will be shown to mediate H2O2-dependent modulation of DA release throughout motor and reward centers of the brain. The present findings should therefore help to clarify normal DA–glutamate interactions in these regions. Because DA–glutamate dysfunction has been implicated as a causal factor in Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and addiction (40–45, 89), these data may also suggest novel pathways through which such dysfunction could occur.
As noted above, KATP channels are expressed abundantly in DA cells; the most metabolically sensitive of these channels are composed of SUR1 and Kir6.2 subunits (86). The characteristics of DA-cell KATP channels (e.g., whether they are G protein coupled and the extent to which they interact with D2 receptors) are unresolved. The KATP channels shown here to mediate inhibition of axonal DA release in striatum are sensitive to endogenous H2O2, are not G protein coupled, and are independent from D2 receptors. Whether these are the defining characteristics of known KATP channels expressed in DA cells or whether they describe a novel class of KATP channel awaits further investigation.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. William A. Coetzee for helpful discussions about KATP-channel pharmacology. These studies were supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant NS-36362.
Abbreviations: aCSF, artificial cerebrospinal fluid; AMPA, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid; DA, dopamine; [DA]o, extracellular DA concentration; GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid; GABAA, GABA type A; GYKI-52466, 1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine hydrochloride; MCS, mercaptosuccinic acid; KATP channel, ATP-sensitive K+ channel; mitKATP channel, mitochondrial KATP channel; SUR1/2, sulfonylurea receptor 1 or 2; 5-HD, 5-hydroxydecanoic acid.
References
- 1.Noma, A. (1983) Nature 305, 147–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cook, D. L. & Hales, C. N. (1984) Nature 311, 271–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ashcroft, S. J. & Ashcroft, F. M. (1990) Cell. Signalling 2, 197–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liss, B. & Roeper, J. (2001) News Physiol. Sci. 16, 214–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cook, D. L., Satin, L. S., Ashford, M. L. & Hales, C. N. (1988) Diabetes 37, 495–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sturgess, N. C., Kozlowski, R. Z., Carrington, C. A., Hales, C. N. & Ashford, M. L. (1988) Br. J. Pharmacol. 95, 83–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Babenko, A. P., Aguilar-Bryan, L. & Bryan, J. (1998) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 60, 667–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mourre, C., Smith, M. L., Siesjo, B. K. & Lazdunski, M. (1990) Brain Res. 526, 147–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xia, Y. & Haddad, G. G. (1991) J. Comp. Neurol. 314, 278–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Treherne, J. M. & Ashford, M. L. (1991) Neuroscience 40, 523–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schwanstecher, C. & Panten, U. (1993) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 348, 113–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zini, S., Tremblay, E., Pollard, H., Moreau, J. & Ben-Ari, Y. (1993) Neuroscience 55, 1085–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dunn-Meynell, A. A., Routh, V. H., McArdle, J. J. & Levin, B. E. (1997) Brain Res. 745, 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dunn-Meynell, A. A., Rawson, N. E. & Levin, B. E. (1998) Brain Res. 814, 41–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Amoroso, S., Schmid-Antomarchi, H., Fosset, M. & Lazdunski, M. (1990) Science 247, 852–854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Häusser, M. A., de Weille, J. R. & Lazdunski, M. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 174, 909–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jiang, C., Sigworth, F. J. & Haddad, G. G. (1994) J. Neurosci. 14, 5590–5602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Roeper, J. & Ashcroft, F. M. (1995) Pflügers Arch. 430, 44–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Watts, A. E., Hicks, G. A. & Henderson, G. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 3065–3074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guatteo, E., Federici, M., Siniscalchi, A., Knopfel, T., Mercuri, N. B. & Bernardi, G. (1998) J. Neurophysiol. 79, 1239–1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tanaka, T., Yoshida, M., Yokoo, H., Mizoguchi, K. & Tanaka, M. (1996) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 297, 35–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Neusch, C., Runde, D. & Moser, A. (2000) Neurochem. Res. 25, 1521–1526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schmid-Antomarchi, H., Amoroso, S., Fosset, M. & Lazdunski, M. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 3489–3492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Margaill, I., Miquet, J. M., Doble, A., Blanchard, J. C. & Boireau, A. (1992) Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 6, 295–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.During, M. J., Leone, P., Davis, K. E., Kerr, D. & Sherwin, R. S. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 95, 2403–2408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maneuf, Y. P., Duty, S., Hille, C. J., Crossman, A. R. & Brotchie, J. M. (1996) Exp. Neurol. 139, 12–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ben-Ari, Y., Krnjevic, K. & Crepel, V. (1990) Neuroscience 37, 55–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zini, S., Roisin, M. P., Armengaud, C. & Ben-Ari, Y. (1993) Neurosci. Lett. 153, 202–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee, K., Dixon, A. K., Rowe, I. C., Ashford, M. L. & Richardson, P. J. (1996) J. Neurochem. 66, 2562–2571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Akasu, T., Tsurusaki, M. & Shoji, S. (1996) Synapse 24, 125–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Milton, S. L., Thompson, J. W. & Lutz, P. L. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. 282, R1317–R1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ashford, M. L., Boden, P. R. & Treherne, J. M. (1990) Br. J. Pharmacol. 101, 531–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miki, T., Liss, B., Minami, K., Shiuchi, T., Saraya, A., Kashima, Y., Horiuchi, M., Ashcroft, F., Minokoshi, Y., Roeper, J. & Seino, S. (2001) Nat. Neurosci. 4, 507–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Routh, V. H. (2002) Physiol. Behav. 76, 403–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Trapp, S., Ballanyi, K. & Richter, D. W. (1994) NeuroReport 5, 1285–1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pierrefiche, O., Bischoff, A. M. & Richter, D. W. (1996) J. Physiol. 494, 399–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Avshalumov, M. V., Chen, B. T., Marshall, S. P., Peña, D. M. & Rice, M. E. (2003) J. Neurosci. 23, 2744–2750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bernard, V. & Bolam, J. P. (1998) Eur. J. Neurosci. 10, 3721–3736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stefani, A., Chen, Q., Flores-Hernandez, J., Jiao, Y., Reiner, A. & Surmeier, D. J. (1998) Dev. Neurosci. (Basel) 20, 242–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chase, T. N. & Oh, J. D. (2000) Trends Neurosci. 23, S86–S91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Greenamyre, J. T. (2001) Clin. Neuropharmacol. 24, 65–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Deutsch, S. I., Rosse, R. B., Schwartz, B. L. & Mastropaolo, J. (2001) Clin. Neuropharmacol. 24, 43–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sawa, A. & Snyder, S. H. (2002) Science 296, 692–695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Koob, G. F. (2000) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 909, 170–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hyman, S. E. & Malenka, R. C. (2001) Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 695–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Krippeit-Drews, P., Kramer, C., Welker, S., Lang, F., Ammon, H. P. & Drews, G. (1999) J. Physiol. (London) 514, 471–481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Roeper, J., Hainsworth, A. H. & Ashcroft, F. M. (1990) Pflügers Arch. 416, 473–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lin, Y. J., Greif, G. J. & Freedman, J. E. (1993) Mol. Pharmacol. 44, 907–910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tanaka, T., Yoshida, M., Yokoo, H., Mizoguchi, K. & Tanaka, M. (1995) Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 52, 831–835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen, B. T., Avshalumov, M. V. & Rice, M. E. (2001) J. Neurophysiol. 85, 2468–2476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen, B. T. & Rice, M. E. (2001) J. Neurosci. 21, 7841–7847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rice, M. E., Richards, C. D., Nedergaard, S., Hounsgaard, J., Nicholson, C. & Greenfield, S. A. (1994) Exp. Brain Res. 100, 395–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ying, W., Han, S. K., Miller, J. W. & Swanson, R. A. (1999) J. Neurochem. 73, 1549–1556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sokolova, T., Gutterer, J. M., Hirrlinger, J., Hamprecht, B. & Dringen, R. (2001) Neurosci. Lett. 297, 129–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen, B. T., Avshalumov, M. V. & Rice, M. E. (2002) J. Neurophysiol. 87, 1155–1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Seutin, V., Scuvee-Moreau, J., Massotte, L. & Dresse, A. (1995) Brain Res. 683, 275–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stanford, I. M. & Lacey, M. G. (1996) Neuroscience 74, 499–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Uchida, S., Akaike, N. & Nabekura, J. (2000) Neuropharmacology 39, 191–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cragg, S. J. & Greenfield, S. A. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 5738–5746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Counts, S. E., McGuire, S. O., Sortwell, C. E., Crawley, J. N., Collier, T. J. & Mufson, E. J. (2002) J. Neurochem. 83, 442–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Takigawa, T. & Alzheimer, C. (2002) J. Physiol. (London) 539, 67–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jin, W. & Lu, Z. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 13291–13299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hu, H., Sato, T., Seharaseyon, J., Liu, Y., Johns, D. C., O'Rourke, B. & Marban, E. (1999) Mol. Pharmacol. 55, 1000–1005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Szewczyk, A. & Wojtczak, L. (2002) Pharmacol. Rev. 54, 101–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sato, T., Sasaki, N., Seharaseyon, J., O'Rourke, B. & Marban, E. (2000) Circulation 101, 2418–2423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Debska, G., May, R., Kicinska, A., Szewczyk, A., Elger, C. E. & Kunz, W. S. (2001) Brain Res. 892, 42–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Aguilar-Bryan, L., Clement, J. P., IV, Gonzalez, G., Kunjilwar, K., Babenko, A. & Bryan, J. (1998) Physiol. Rev. 78, 227–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Inagaki, N., Gonoi, T., Clement, J. P., IV, Namba, N., Inazawa, J., Gonzalez, G., Aguilar-Bryan, L., Seino, S. & Bryan, J. (1995) Science 270, 1166–1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sakura, H., Ammala, C., Smith, P. A., Gribble, F. M. & Ashcroft, F. M. (1995) FEBS Lett. 367, 338–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Karschin, C., Ecke, C., Ashcroft, F. M. & Karschin, A. (1997) FEBS Lett. 401, 59–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ashcroft, F. M. & Gribble, F. M. (1998) Trends Neurosci. 21, 288–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Inagaki, N., Gonoi, T., Clement, J. P., Wang, C. Z., Aguilar-Bryan, L., Bryan, J. & Seino, S. (1996) Neuron 16, 1011–1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Babenko, A. P., Gonzalez, G. & Bryan, J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 717–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ye, G. L., Leung, C. K. & Yung, W. H. (1997) Brain Res. 753, 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Garcia de Arriba, S., Franke, H., Pissarek, M., Nieber, K. & Illes, P. (1999) Neurosci. Lett. 273, 13–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Marinelli, S., Bernardi, G., Giacomini, P. & Mercuri, N. B. (2000) Neuropharmacology 39, 1021–1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pérez-Pinzón, M. A. & Born, J. G. (1999) Neuroscience 89, 453–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lacey, M. G., Mercuri, N. B. & North, R. A. (1987) J. Physiol. (London) 392, 397–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lacey, M. G., Mercuri, N. B. & North, R. A. (1988) J. Physiol. (London) 401, 437–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Hicks, G. A. & Henderson, G. (1992) Neurosci. Lett. 141, 213–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Stanford, I. M. & Lacey, M. G. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 4651–4657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zhang, H. Y., McPherson, B. C., Liu, H., Baman, T. S., Rock, P. & Yao, Z. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. 282, H1395–H1403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Krenz, M., Oldenburg, O., Wimpee, H., Cohen, M. V., Garlid, K. D., Critz, S. D., Downey, J. M. & Benoit, J. N. (2002) Basic Res. Cardiol. 97, 365–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Boveris, A. & Chance, B. (1973) Biochem. J. 134, 707–716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Smith, A. D. & Bolam, J. P. (1990) Trends Neurosci. 13, 259–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Liss, B., Bruns, R. & Roeper, J. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 833–846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Fujiyama, F., Fritschy, J. M., Stephenson, F. A. & Bolam, J. P. (2000) J. Comp. Neurol. 416, 158–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Schwanstecher, C. & Bassen, D. (1997) Br. J. Pharmacol. 121, 193–198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Olanow, C. W. & Tatton, W. G. (1999) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 123–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]