Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology logoLink to The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology
. 1961 Apr 1;9(4):733–745. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.4.733

RELATION BETWEEN WATER PERMEABILITY AND INTEGRITY OF SULFHYDRYL GROUPS IN MALIGNANT AND NORMAL CELLS

Morris Belkin 1, Walter G Hardy 1
PMCID: PMC2225047  PMID: 19866586

Abstract

When malignant cells, animal and human, were exposed in vitro to solutions of heavy metals or other selected compounds, three types of cell blebs were produced: (1) acentric blebs, arising from one side of the cell, e. g., by chlormerodrin, meralluride sodium, mercuric chloride; (2) symmetrical blebs; which completely enveloped the cell, e. g., by strong silver protein, auric chloride, p-chloromercuribenzoate; (3) scallop blebs, numerous small spherical elevations which completely covered the cell, e.g., by N-ethyl-maleimide, trivalent arsenicals, iodoacetamide. As indicated by vital stains and morphologic appearance, the blebs arose in healthy cells. They also can be made to appear in vivo in ascites tumor cells by intraperitoneal administration of a blebbing agent. All the bleb-producing chemicals have the property of reacting with protein-sulfhydryl groups by alkylation, oxidation or mercaptide formation. The three bleb types have been induced in 8 mouse and 2 rat ascites tumor cells; in 4 human and 1 mouse malignant cell lines; and in 3 normal cell lines grown in tissue culture. In contrast, cells from normal solid tissues of liver, lung, spleen, kidney, testis and brain from mouse, rat and rabbit failed to produce blebs. A possible interpretation for these observations is presented.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BENESCH R. E., BENESCH R. Relation between erythrocyte integrity and sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1954 Jan;48(1):38–42. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(54)90302-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartram E. A. EXPERIMENTAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS DIURETICS WHEN INJECTED DIRECTLY INTO ONE RENAL ARTERY OF THE DOG. J Clin Invest. 1932 Nov;11(6):1197–1219. doi: 10.1172/JCI100472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CAFRUNY E. J., FARAH A., DI STEFANO H. S. Effects of the mercurial diuretic mersalyl on protein-bound sulfhydryl groups in the cytoplasm of rat kidney cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1955 Dec;115(4):390–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CLARK J. B., WYSS O., STONE W. S. Induction of mutation in Micrococcus pyogenes by chemical inactivation of sulphydryl groups. Nature. 1950 Aug 26;166(4217):340–341. doi: 10.1038/166340a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Duggan J. J., Pitts R. F., Miner P., Barrett M. STUDIES ON DIURETICS. I. THE SITE OF ACTION OF MERCURIAL DIURETICS. J Clin Invest. 1950 Mar;29(3):365–371. doi: 10.1172/JCI102267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ELLEM K. A. Some aspects of the ascites tumor cell response to a heterologous antiserum. Cancer Res. 1958 Nov;18(10):1179–1185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards J. G. The Renal Tubule (Nephron) as Affected by Mercury. Am J Pathol. 1942 Nov;18(6):1011–1027. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FARAH A., CAFRUNY E. J., DI STERANO H. S. Histochemical studies on the site of action of mercurial diuretics. J Histochem Cytochem. 1955 Jul;3(4):271–273. doi: 10.1177/3.4.271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FARAH A., KRUSE R. The relation of mercurial diuresis to cellular protein-bound sulfhydryl changes in renal cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1960 Sep;130:13–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HANDLEY C. A., LAVIK P. S. Inhibition of the kidney succinic dehydrogenase system by mercurial diuretics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1950 Sep;100(1):115–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. JENSEN E. V. Sulfhydryl-disulfide interchange. Science. 1959 Nov 13;130(3385):1319–1323. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3385.1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KING D. W., PAULSON S. R., PUCKETT N. L., KREBS A. T. Cell death. IV. The effect of injury on the entrance of vital dye in Ehrlich tumor cells. Am J Pathol. 1959 Sep-Oct;35:1067–1079. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LEIGHTON J., KLINE I., ORR H. C. Transformation of normal human fibroblasts into histologically malignant tissue in vitro. Science. 1956 Mar 23;123(3195):502–503. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3195.502-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MUDGE G. H., FOULKS J., GILMAN A. Effect of urea diuresis on renal excretion of electrolytes. Am J Physiol. 1949 Aug;158(2):218–230. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1949.158.2.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MUSTAKALLIO K. K., TELKKA A. Histochemical localization of the mercurial inhibition of succinic dehydrogenase in rat kidney. Science. 1953 Sep 18;118(3064):320–321. doi: 10.1126/science.118.3064.320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. OLIVER J. An essay toward a dynamic morphology of the mammalian nephron. Am J Med. 1950 Jul;9(1):88–101. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(50)90011-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. POTTER M. Variation in resistance patterns in different neoplasms. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1958 Dec 5;76(3):630–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1958.tb54881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. RAY C. T., BURCH G. E. Clinical aspects of mercurial diuretics. Circulation. 1951 Jul;4(1):926–937. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.3.6.926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. RENNELS E. G., RUSKIN A. Histochemical changes in succinic dehydrogenase activity in rat kidney following administration of mercurial diuretics. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Feb;85(2):309–314. doi: 10.3181/00379727-85-20864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. ROBINSON J. R. Metabolism of intracellular water. Physiol Rev. 1960 Jan;40:112–149. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1960.40.1.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. SATO H., BELKIN M., ESSNER E. Experiments on an ascites hepatoma. III. The conversion of mouse hepatomas into the ascites form. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1956 Jul;17(1):1–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. SMITH H. M. Effects of sulfhydryl blockade on axonal function. J Cell Physiol. 1958 Apr;51(2):161–171. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030510203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WACHSTEIN M., MEISEL E. Protective action of certain amino acids on toxicity of mercurial diuretics in rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1951 Mar;76(3):523–527. doi: 10.3181/00379727-76-18543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. WACHSTEIN M., MEISEL E. Renal succinic dehydrogenase and mercurial diuretics. Experientia. 1954 Dec 15;10(12):495–496. doi: 10.1007/BF02166178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. WELT L. G., GOODYER A. V., DARRAGH J. H., ABELE W. A., MERONEY W. H. Site of saluretic action of an organic mercurial compound. J Appl Physiol. 1953 Aug;6(2):134–138. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1953.6.2.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. WESSON L. G., Jr, ANSLOW W. P., Jr, SMITH H. W. The excretion of strong electrolytes. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1948 Sep;24(9):586–606. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. WESTON R. E., GROSSMAN J., LEITER L. The effect of mercurial diuretics on renal ammonia and titratable acidity production in acidotic human subjects with reference to site of diuretic action. J Clin Invest. 1951 Nov;30(11):1262–1271. doi: 10.1172/JCI102546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wachstein M., Meisel E. On the Histochemical Localization of the Mercurial Inhibition of Succinic Dehydrogenase in Rat Kidney. Science. 1954 Jan 15;119(3081):100–100. doi: 10.1126/science.119.3081.100-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES