Summary
McArdle disease or Glycogenosis type V is an autosomal recessive metabolic disorder caused by a deficiency of the muscle isoform of glycogen phosphorylase (myophosphorylase, PYGM), the specific skeletal muscle enzyme that initiates glycogen breakdown. Since the first clinical description by Brian McArdle in 1951, several patients have been identified worldwide and significant advances have been made in the study of molecular genetics of the disease. Molecular heterogeneity has been demonstrated by the identification to date of more than 65 mutations in the PYGM gene.
In this paper, we will present an update on the mutations reported to date in the PYGM gene.
Keywords: McArdle disease, Glycogenosis type V, PYGM gene
Clinical data
McArdle disease or Glycogen Storage Disease type V (GSD-V; MIM # 232600) is the most common muscle glycogenosis caused by the deficiency muscle glycogen phosphorylase (myophosphorylase, EC 2.4.1.1) activity. GSD-V is clinically characterized by exercise intolerance with premature fatigue, cramps, myalgia, moderate to high levels of serum creatine kinase (CK) at rest, and by episodic myoglobinuria (1). All McArdle patients experience the so-called ‘second-wind’ phenomenon, characterized by the ability to resume exercise with less difficulty, after following a short period of rest at the first appearance of fatigue (2). A subset of patients develops fixed weakness and wasting with aging, indicating phenotypic variability).
The diagnosis is based on the clinical phenotype and DNA analysis is suggested as the first choice in the diagnostic approach.
Inheritance
McArdle disease is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner; the parents of an affected child are obligate heterozygotes and therefore carry one mutant allele. Heterozygotes (carriers) are generally asymptomatic. However, some cases of symptomatic heterozygous patients, with only one mutation in the PYGM gene identified, have been reported. This has been explained by an unusual low myophosphorylase activity with a putative threshold of about 20-40% or by a pseudo-dominant inheritance. An apparent dominant transmission due to the mating of a heterozygote with a homozygote have been reported in families with pseudo-dominant inheritance (3, 4).
Muscle glycogen phosphorylase
Glycogen phosphorylase initiates glycogen breakdown by removing α-1,4 glucosyl units phosphorylitically from the outer branches of glycogen with liberation of glucose-1-phosphate. In humans, there are three phosphorylase isoforms: the liver isoform, the brain isoform, and the muscle isoform (myophosphorylase). Brain and heart tissues express both, the brain enzyme and myophosphorylase whereas liver contains exclusively the liver isoform (5). In fetal muscle both liver and brain isoenzymes are expressed, while during muscle maturation, these isoenzymes are gradually replaced by the myophosphorylase, which results to be the only form in adult muscle fibers. The enzyme exists as a homodimer containing two identical subunits of 97,000 daltons each. The dimers associate into a tetramer to form the enzymatically active phosphorylase A. The N-terminal domain extends from amino acid residue 1 to 482 (“regulatory” domain) and the C-terminal domain extends from residue 483 to 842 (“catalytic” domain) (6).
The PYGM gene
The human myophosphorylase gene (PYGM, MIM #608455), assigned to chromosome 11 in 1984 (7), was identified in 1993, as the GSD-V causing gene (3).
The PYGM gene spans about 14.2 kb of genomic sequence made of 20 exons, and contains a coding region of 2529-bp in length that encodes for a protein of 842 amino acids (3).
PYGM mutations
At the last count (December 2006), 67 different mutations have been identified in the PYGM gene: 12 nonsense mutations, 33 missense mutations, 12 deletions, 3 deletion/insertions, one silent mutation affecting the splicing and 5 intronic mutations (8–40) (Table 1).
Table 1. PYGM Mutations reported up to December 2006.
| Ex/In | Codon | Coding Sequence | AA change | Type Mut. | Reference |
| 1 | 1 | c.1A > C | p.M1L | M | Tsujino,1995 |
| 1 | 1 | c.1A > G | p.M1V | M | Vorgerd 1998 |
| 1 | 5 | c.13_14delCT | p.L5VfsX22 | D | Rubio 2006 |
| 1 | 16 | c.46delGinsTT | p.V16FfsX12 | D/I | Bartram 1994 |
| 1 | 26/27 | c.78_79delTG | p.E27AfsX50 | D | Isackson 2005 |
| 1 | 50 | c.148C > T | p.R50X | N | Tsujino 1993 |
| 1 | 53 | c.159C > G | p.Y53X | N | Hadjigeorgiou,2002 |
| 2 | 85 | c.255C > A | p.Y85X | N | Deschauer 2003 |
| 2 | 94 | c.280C > T | p.R94W | M | Deschauer 2003 |
| 2 | 102 | c.304delA | p.N102TfsX4 | D | Bruno 2006 |
| 3 | 116 | c.347T > C | p.L116P | M | Gamez 1999 |
| 3 | 125 | c.373G > T | p.E125X | N | Martin,2001 |
| 3 | 139 | c.415C > T | p.R139W | M | Martín 2004 |
| 4 | 159 | c.475G > A | p.G159R | M | Bruno 2006 |
| 5 | 194 | c.580C > T | p.R194W | M | Martin,2000 |
| 5 | 205 | c.613G > A | p.G205S | M | Tsujino 1993 |
| 6 | 230 | c.689C > G | p.P230R | M | Bruno 2006 |
| 6 | 239 | c.715_717delGTC | p.V239del | D | Bruno 2006 |
| 7 | 270 | c.808 C > T | p.R270X | N | Deschauer 2001 |
| 8 | 292 | c.875T > C | p.L292P | M | Tsujino,1994 |
| 9 | 349 | c.1045G > A | p.E349K | M | Martin,2001 |
| 9 | 362 | c.1086G > A | p.W362X | N | Bruno,1999 |
| 10 | 365 | c.1094C > T | p.A365V | M | Bruno 2006 |
| 10 | 384 | c.1151C > A | p.A384D | M | Bruno 2006 |
| 10 | 388/390 | c.1162_1169delTGGCCGGTinsA | p.W388SfsX34 | D/I | Martin,2001 |
| 10 | 397 | c.1190T > C | p.L397P | M | Tsujino,1995 |
| 11 | 428 | c.1282C > T | p.R428C | M | Bruno 2006 |
| 11 | 456 | c.1366G > A | p.V456M | M | Mancuso 2003 |
| 12 | 488 | c.1463C > A | p.T488N | M | Rubio,2000 |
| 12 | 491 | c.1471C > T | p.R491C | M | Bruno 2006 |
| 12 | 492 | c.1475G > A | p.W492X | N | Bruno 2006 |
| 12 | 494 | c.1480delG | p.V494FfsX45 | D | DiMauro 2002 |
| 13 | 511 | c.1531delG | p.D511TfsX28 | D | Tsujino,1994 |
| 13 | 534 | c.1601delA | p.D534VfsX5 | D | Martin,2001 |
| 14 | 541 | c.1621G > T | p.E541X | N | Bruno,1999 |
| 14 | 543 | c.1627A > T | p.K543X | N | Bruno 2006 |
| 14 | 543 | c.1628A > C | p.K543T | M | Tsujino 1993 |
| 14 | 574 | c.1722 T > G | p.Y574X | N | Gamez 2003 |
| 14 | 576 | c.1726C > T | p.R576X | N | Vorgerd 1998 |
| 14 | 587 | c.1760T > C | p.L587P | M | Paradas 2005 |
| 15 | 599 | c.1797delT | p.F599LfsX6 | D | Martín 2003 |
| 15 | 602 | c.1804C > T | p.R602W | M | Martin,2001 |
| 15 | 602 | c.1805G > A | p.R602Q | M | Hadjigeorgiou,2002 |
| 15 | 609 | c.1827 G > A | - | S/S | Gamez 2003 |
| 16 | 655 | c.1963G > A | p.E655K | M | Tsujino,1995 |
| 17 | 657/726 | c.1970_2177del* | p.V657GfsX21 | D | Bruno 2006 |
| 17 | 660 | c.1979C > A | p.A660D | M | Martin,2000 |
| 17 | 666 | c.1996C > G | p.Q666E | M | Vorgerd 1998 |
| 17 | 685 | c.2053A > T | pN685Y | M | Andreu 1999 |
| 17 | 686 | c.2056G > A | p.G686R | M | Vorgerd 1998 |
| 17 | 686 | c.2056G > C | p.G686R | M | Martinuzzi 1999 |
| 17 | 687 | c.2059G > C | p.A687P | M | Bruno 2002 |
| 17 | 692 | c.2075_2076delCCinsAAA | p.T692KfsX30 | D/I | Quintans 2004 |
| 17 | 704 | c.2111C > T | p.A704V | M | Martin,2001 |
| 17 | 705 | c.2113_2114delGG | p.G705RfsX16 | D | Bruno 2006 |
| 17 | 710 | c.2128_2130delTTC | p.F710del | D | Tsujino,1994 |
| 18 | 754 | c.2262delA | p.K754NfsX49 | D | Kubish 1998 |
| 18 | 755 | c.2263C > T | p.Q755X | N | Martin,2001 |
| 20 | 795/796 | c.2385_2386delAA | p.E797VfsX18 | D | Martin,2000 |
| 20 | 798 | c.2392T > C | p.W798R | M | Rubio.2000 |
| 20 | 815 | c.2444A > C | p.D815A | M | Bruno 2006 |
| 20 | 826 | c.2477G > C | p.W826S | M | Bruno 2006 |
| Int. 7 | - | c.855 + 1G > C | - | NEA | Bruno 2006 |
| Int. 9 | - | c.1092 + 1G > A | - | NEA | Bruno 2006 |
| Int. 9 | - | c.1093-1G > T | - | NEA | Bruno 2006 |
| Int. 10 | - | c.1239 + 1G > A | - | NEA | Bruno 2006 |
| Int. 14 | - | c.1768 + 1G > A | p.V568AfsX16 | S | Tsujino,1994 |
| Int. 19 | - | c.2380-1G > A | - | NEA | Bruno 2006 |
The mutations have been named according to the recommendations made by den Dunnen and Antonarakis 2002, also in www.HGVS.org/mutnomen/. Reference sequence database NM_005609.
N = nonsense; M = missense; D = deletion; D/I = deletion/insertion; S/S = silent/splicing; NEA = not experimentally analyzed; S = splicing. * Recently identified in the cDNA, should be an intronic mutation that affects the splicing at cDNA level or a genomic deletion.
Among the mutations located at the codifying region, 27 variants lie within the N-terminal region and 34 in the C-terminal domain, indicating that the regulatory and catalytic domains are equally affected. Since mutations are described in almost every exon of the PYGM gene, we can conclude that there is no a real mutational “hot spot” region.
Mutations in PYGM reduce or abolish the myophosphorylase enzyme activity in muscle. Missense mutations may affect contact dimer pairs, or can disrupt hydrogen bond interactions thus affecting substrate or effector/inhibitor binding sites. Nonsense mutations lead to truncated proteins, but may also produce severe effects at the transcriptional level. Interestingly, no insertions or large rearrangements have been reported in the PYGM gene. In addition, no mutations have been found in the PYGM promoter region.
We have recently showed that an apparently silent PYGM polymorphism (p.K609K) in a patient led to a severe alteration in mRNA splicing, thus resulting to be pathogenic (41).
Additionally, in two unrelated patients, with no changes identified in the DNA sequences, we have detected at the cDNA level, the complete deletion of exon 17, suggesting the presence of an intronic mutation affecting the splicing of exon 17 or a large genomic deletion (39).
The “common” p.R50X mutation. A single base pair substitution (G > T) at nucleotide 148 in exon 1 is the most frequent mutation identified in Caucasian McArdle patients. This common mutation, initially reported as p.R49X has been now recalled as p.R50X, following the recommendations of the Nomenclature Working Group (42), http://hgvs.org/mutnomen. Several studies of large series of patients suggest an homogeneous distribution of this nonsense mutation among different countries, having the highest frequency in British and North-American patients (81% and 63% of the alleles, respectively) (8, 13). In other European countries the relative percentage of affected alleles bearing the p.R50X mutation is rather uniform (Germany 56%, France 56%, Spain 55%) with the lowest frequency in Italy (17, 22, 29, 39) (Table 2).
Table 2. p.R50X allele frequency in different Caucasian populations.
| Population | R50X allele frequency | Reference |
| British | 81% | Bartram 1994 |
| North-American | 63% | el-Schahawi 1996 |
| German | 56% | Vorgerd 1998 |
| French | 56% | Bruno 2000 |
| Spanish | 55% | Martín 2001 |
| Italian | 43% | Bruno 2006 |
This observation has important diagnostic consequences as this is the mutation that should be studied first. This can be made easily by using the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis (Nla III restriction enzyme) (3), or by a specific primer extension technique, using minisequencing analysis (39).
Other PYGM Mutations. The second most common mutation identified in the PYGM gene is the missense p.G205S mutation that accounts for 10% of alleles in American patients and 9% of alleles in Spanish patients (3, 29). However, both the p.R50X and the p.G205S mutations have never been identified in Japanese patients. Interestingly, two frequent population-related mutations have been exclusively found in Japan and in Spain: the p.F710del is the most common mutation in Japanese McArdle cases (11), and the p.W798R has been found in 16.5% of Spanish patients (29). Few examples of less frequent mutations reported by different groups are: p.R270X (27, 36, 39), p.L397P (12, 14, 39), the intron 14 mutation c.1768 + 1G > A (10, 15, 20, 29, 39) and c.2262delA in exon 18 (10, 17, 39).
Most of the other mutations reported, have only been found in a single patient.
Genotype–phenotype correlation
No apparent correlation between the severity of the phenotype and the genotype has been reported analysing large number of patients (29, 39). Patients with the same mutation may present different clinical manifestations, ranging from mild exercise-related symptoms to severe myalgia and myoglobinuria, proving that factors other than the single variants in the PYGM gene might influence the clinical presentation in the patients (1).
In some cases, the severe phenotype may be explained by the association with mutation in the AMPD1 gene (1).
In addition, an angiotensin converter enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion polymorphism might play a significant role as a phenotype modulator in individuals with GSD-V (44).
Conclusion
Molecular genetics studying by DNA testing should be the first choice in the diagnostic of McArdle disease, starting to analyse the common p.R50X mutation.
However, since most of the PYGM mutations are private, the possibility of finding new mutations has to be taken into account. Any a priori silent variant has to be evaluated as possible putative pathogenic mutation. Finally, we underline the importance of the cDNA analysis that may allow the genetic diagnosis, providing novel information on the mechanisms of the PYGM gene splicing machinery.
Acknowledgements
Supported by grants from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS PI040487, FIS PI040362), the Spanish Network for Rare Diseases (CB06/07/0015), Ricerca Corrente-Istituto Gaslini, and the Italian Ministry of Health.
References
- 1.DiMauro S, Andreu AL, Bruno C, et al. Myophosphorylase Deficiency (Glycogenosis Type V; McArdle Disease). Curr Mol Med 2002;2:189-96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Haller RG, Vissing J. Spontaneous “second wind” and glucose-induced second “second wind” in McArdle disease: oxidative mechanisms. Arch Neurol 2002;59:1395-402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tsujino S, Shanske S, Di Mauro S. Molecular genetic heterogeneity of myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle’s disease). N Engl J Med 1993;329:241-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Isackson PJ, Tarnopolsky M, Vladutiu GD. A novel mutation in the PYGM gene in a family with pseudo-dominant transmission of McArdle disease. Mol Genet Metab 2005;85:239-42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.DiMauro S, Tsujino S. Nonlysosomal glycogenoses. In: Engel AG, Franzini-Amstrong C, eds. Myology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995. p. 1554-76. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Browner MF, Fletterick RJ. Phosphorylase: a biological transducer. Trends Biochem Sci 1992;17:66-71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lebo RV, Gorin F, Fletterick RJ, et al. High-resolution chromosome sorting and DNA spot-blot analysis assign McArdle’s syndrome to chromosome 11. Science 1984;225:57-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bartram C, Edwards RH, Clague J, et al. McArdle’s disease: a rare frameshift mutation in exon 1 of the muscle glycogen phosphorylase gene. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994;1226:341-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tsujino S, Shanske S, Goto Y, et al. Two mutations, one novel and one frequently observed, in Japanese patients with McArdle’s disease. Hum Mol Genet 1994;3:1005-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tsujino S, Shanske S, Nonaka I, et al. Three new mutations in patients with myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle disease). Am J Hum Genet 1994;54:44-52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sugie H, Sugie Y, Ito M, et al. Genetic analysis of Japanese patients with myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle’s disease): single-codon deletion in exon 17 is the predominant mutation. Clin Chim Acta 1995;236:81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tsujino S, Shanske S, Martinuzzi A. Two novel missense mutations (E654K, L396P) in Caucasian patients with myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle’s disease). Hum Mutat 1995;6:276-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tsujino S, Shanske S, Nonaka I, et al. The molecular genetic basis of myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle’s disease). Muscle Nerve 1995;3:23-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Martinuzzi A, Tsujino S, Vergani L, et al. Molecular characterization of myophosphorylase deficiency in a group of patients from northern Italy. J Neurol Sci 1996;137:14-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Iyengar S, Kalinsky H, Weiss S, et al. Homozygosity by descent for a rare mutation in the myophosphorylase gene is associated with variable phenotypes in a Druze family with McArdle disease. J Med Genet 1997;34:391-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kubisch C, Wicklein EM, Jentsch TJ. Molecular diagnosis of McArdle disease: revised genomic structure of the myophosphorylase gene and identification of a novel mutation. Hum Mutat 1998;12:27-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vorgerd M, Kubisch C, Burwinkel B, et al. Mutation analysis in myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle’s disease). Ann Neurol 1998;43:326-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Andreu AL, Bruno C, Tamburino L, et al. A new mutation in the myophosphorylase gene (Asn684Tyr) in a Spanish patient with McArdle’s disease. Neuromuscul Disord 1999;9:171-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bruno C, Tamburino L, Kawashima N, et al. A nonsense mutation in the myophosphorylase gene in a Japanese family with McArdle’s disease. Neuromuscul Disord 1999;9:34-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bruno C, Lofberg M, Tamburino L, et al. Molecular characterization of McArdle’s disease in two large Finnish families. J Neurol Sci 1999;165:121-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gamez J, Fernandez R, Bruno C, et al. A new mutation in the regulatory domain of the myophosphorylase gene affecting protein dimer contact. Muscle Nerve 1999;22:1136-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bruno C, Di Mauro S, Lombes A, et al. Molecular study in a large series of French patients with McArdle’s disease. J Neurol 2000;274:120-1. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Martin MA, Rubio JC, Campos Y, et al. Two homozygous mutations (R193W and 794/795 delAA) in the myophosphorylase gene in a patient with McArdle’s disease. Hum Mutat 2000;15:294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Martin MA, Rubio JC, Campos Y, et al. A homozygous missense mutation (A659D) in the myophosphorylase gene in a Spanish patient with McArdle’s disease. Neuromuscul Disord 2000;10:447-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rubio JC, Martin MA, Campos Y, et al. A missense mutation W797R in the myophosphorylase gene in a Spanish patient with McArdle’s disease. Muscle Nerve 2000;23:129-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rubio JC, Martin MA, Campos Y, et al. A missense mutation T487N in the myophosphorylase gene in a Spanish patient with McArdle’s disease. Neuromuscul Disord 2000;10:138-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Deschauer M, Opalka JR, Lindner A, et al. A novel nonsense mutation (R269X) in the myophosphorylase gene in a patient with McArdle disease. Mol Genet Metab 2001;74:489-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Martin MA, Rubio JC, Garcia A, et al. Resolution of a mispaired secondary structure intermediate could account for a novel micro-insertion/deletion (387 insA/del 8 bp) in the PYGM gene causing McArdle’s disease. Clin Genet 2001;59:48-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Martin MA, Rubio JC, Buchbinder J, et al. Molecular heterogeneity of myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle’s disease): a genotype-phenotype correlation study. Ann Neurol 2001;50:574-81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bruno C, Lanzillo R, Biedi C, et al. Two new mutations in the myophosphorylase gene in Italian patients with McArdle’s disease. Neuromuscul Disord 2002;12:498-500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hadjigeorgiou GM, Papadimitriou A, Musumeci O, et al. A new stop codon mutation (Y52X) in the myophosphorylase gene in a Greek patient with McArdle’s disease. J Neurol Sci 2002;194:83-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hadjigeorgiou GM, Sadeh M, Musumeci O, et al. Molecular genetic study of myophosphorylase deficiency (McArdle’s disease) in two Yemenite-Jewish families. Neuromuscul Disord 2002;12:824-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Deschauer M, Hertel K, Zierz S. Two novel mutations in the myophosphorylase gene in a patient with McArdle disease. Muscle Nerve 2003;27:105-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gamez J, Rubio JC, Martin MA, et al. Two novel mutations in the muscle glycogen phosphorylase gene in McArdle’s disease. Muscle Nerve 2003;28:380-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mancuso M, Filosto M, Tsujino S, et al. Muscle glycogenosis and mitochondrial hepatopathy in an infant with mutations in both the myophosphorylase and deoxyguanosine kinase genes. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1445-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Martin MA, Rubio JC, Wevers RA, et al. Molecular analysis of myophosphorylase deficiency in Dutch patients with McArdle’s disease. Ann Hum Genet 2004;68:17-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Quintans B, Sanchez-Andrade A, Tejeira S, et al. A new rare mutation (691delCC/InsAAA) in exon 17 of the PYGM gene causing McArdle disease. Arch Neurol 2004;61:1108-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Paradas C, Fernandez-Cadenas I, Gallardo E, et al. Variable presentation of the clinical phenotype of McArdle’s disease in a kindred harbouring a novel compound genotype in the muscle glycogen phosphorylase gene. Neurosci Lett 2005;391:28-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bruno C, Cassandrini D, Martinuzzi A, et al. McArdle disease: the mutation spectrum of PYGM in a large Italian cohort. Hum Mutat 2006;27:718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rubio JC, Lucia A, Fernandez-Cadenas I, et al. Novel mutation in the PYGM gene resulting in McArdle disease. Arch Neurol 2006;63:1782-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fernandez-Cadenas I, Andreu AL, Gamez J, et al. Splicing mosaic of the myophosphorylase gene due to a silent mutation in McArdle disease. Neurology 2003;61:1432-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.den Dunnen JT, Paalman MH. Standardizing mutation nomenclature: why bother? Hum Mutat 2003;22:181-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.el-Schahawi M, Tsujino S, Shanske S, et al. Diagnosis of McArdle’s disease by molecular genetic analysis of blood. Neurology 1996;47:579-80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Martinuzzi A, Sartori E, Fanin M, et al. Phenotype modulators in myophosphorylase deficiency. Ann Neurol 2003;53:497-502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
