Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Jan 22;67(Pt 2):i18–i19. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811002157

Redetermination of synthetic warwickite, Mg3TiO2(BO3)2

Tetsuya Kawano a, Hisanori Yamane a,*
PMCID: PMC3051737  PMID: 21522815

Abstract

Single crystals of warwickite, trimagnesium titanium(IV) dioxide bis­(borate), Mg3TiO2(BO3)2, were prepared by slow cooling of the melt. The title compound is isotypic with Co3TiO2(BO3)2. In contrast to the previous refinement of warwickite [Moore & Araki (1974). Am. Mineral. 59, 985–1004], that reported only isotropic atomic displacement parameters for all atoms, anisotropic displacement parameters of all atoms were refined during the current redetermination. All atoms are situated on special positions (site symmetry .m.). One of the two Mg sites is statistically disordered with Ti atoms (ratio 1:1), while the other is fully occupied by Mg atoms. The occupancy ratio of the Mg and Ti atoms is similar to that reported in the previous study. Metal atoms (M) at the Ti/Mg and Mg sites are coordinated by six O atoms in form of distorted octa­hedra. Four edge-sharing MO6 octa­hedra form M 4O18 units, which are connected by common corners into layers parallel to (010). Adjacent layers are linked along [010] into a framework structure by sharing common edges. The B atoms are located in the triangular prismatic tunnels of the framework.

Related literature

For the structure determination of natural warwickite, Mg3TiO2(BO3)2, see: Takéuchi et al. (1950); Moore & Araki (1974). For the synthesis and crystal structure analysis of Co3 MO2(BO3)2 (M = Ti, Zr), see: Utzolino & Bluhm (1995). For the synthesis of Mg5TiO4(BO3)2 and Mg3ZrO2(BO3)2, see: Konijnendijk & Blasse (1985). For the structure of Mg5TiO4(BO3)2, see: Kawano & Yamane (2010). For bond-valence-sum calculations, see: Brown & Altermatt (1985). For bond-valence parameters, see: Brese & O’Keeffe (1991). For structure standardization, see: Gelato & Parthé (1987).

Experimental

Crystal data

  • Mg3TiO2(BO3)2

  • M r = 270.45

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 9.3013 (5) Å

  • b = 3.10080 (14) Å

  • c = 9.3914 (6) Å

  • V = 270.86 (3) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.94 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.17 × 0.17 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID II diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: numerical (NUMABS; Higashi, 1999) T min = 0.791, T max = 0.839

  • 2510 measured reflections

  • 364 independent reflections

  • 348 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.018

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.026

  • wR(F 2) = 0.070

  • S = 1.20

  • 364 reflections

  • 44 parameters

  • Δρmax = 0.36 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.59 e Å−3

Data collection: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku/MSC, 2005); cell refinement: PROCESS-AUTO; data reduction: PROCESS-AUTO; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2004 (Burla et al., 2005); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: VESTA (Momma & Izumi, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811002157/wm2443sup1.cif

e-67-00i18-sup1.cif (15.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811002157/wm2443Isup2.hkl

e-67-00i18-Isup2.hkl (18.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected geometric parameters (Å, °), M = (Mg, Ti).

M1—O4i 1.9702 (12)
M1—O4ii 1.9989 (19)
M1—O2 2.0730 (18)
M1—O1i 2.1565 (13)
Mg2—O3iii 2.0043 (12)
Mg2—O4iv 2.0698 (19)
Mg2—O1 2.1387 (19)
Mg2—O2v 2.1522 (13)
B1—O3 1.353 (3)
B1—O2 1.393 (3)
B1—O1 1.395 (3)
O3—B1—O2 119.1 (2)
O3—B1—O1 120.7 (2)
O2—B1—O1 120.3 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Global COE Program ‘Materials Integration, Tohoku University’ and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (No. 21350113, 2009) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology (MEXT), Japan.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Crystal structure determinations of the mineral warwickite, Mg3TiO2(BO3)2, were reported by Takéuchi et al. (1950) and Moore & Araki (1974). The natural samples contained a few amount of Fe and Al. The crystal structure of synthetic Mg3TiO2(BO3)2 has not been analyzed up to now. We obtained single crystals of this compound during the preparation of Mg5TiO4(BO3)2 (Kawano & Yamane, 2010). Anisotropic atomic displacement parameters (Uij) of Mg, Ti, B and O atoms were refined in the present study. Moore & Araki (1974) refined isotropic atomic displacement parameters (Biso) of Mg, Ti, B and O atoms; neither U nor B-values were reported by Takéuchi et al. (1950).

Synthetic warwickite-type oxyborates with general composition MII3MIVO2(BO3)2 are known for Co3MO2(BO3)2 [M = Ti, Zr (Utzolino & Bluhm, 1995)] and Mg3ZrO2(BO3)2 (Konijnendijk & Blasse, 1985). However, only the crystal structures of Co3MO2(BO3)2 (M = Ti, Zr) were analyzed. The title compound Mg3TiO2(BO3)2 is isotypic with Co3MO2(BO3)2 [M = Ti, Zr (Utzolino & Bluhm, 1995)].

Figs. 1 and 2 show the coordination environments of the Mg, Ti, B and O atoms, and the crystal structure of Mg3TiO2(BO3)2, respectively. In the asymmetric unit, there is one Ti/Mg mixed site (M1) with occupancies of 0.5/0.5 and one Mg site (M2). Moore and Araki (1974) refined the site occupancy factors of Mg and Ti atoms at the M1 and M2 sites, ignoring Al and Fe atoms due to their similarities with the scattering profiles of Mg2+ and Ti4+, respectively. Refined occupancy factors were M1 = Mg0.96 (1)/Ti0.04 (1) and M2 = Mg0.62 (2)/Ti0.38 (2) and an ideal formula of Mg(Mg0.5Ti0.5)O2[BO3] was suggested (Moore & Araki, 1974). Our refinement (M1 = Mg1 and M2 = Mg0.5/Ti0.5) is consistent with the ideal formula. Although Takéuchi et al. (1950) reported the atomic coordinates of natural warwickite, site occupancy factors of the M1 and M2 sites were not reported.

All atoms are at special positions (x, 1/4, z), 4c, with site symmetries of (.m.). Mg and Ti atoms occupy six-coordinated oxygen-octahedral sites, forming layers composed of M4O18 (M = Ti/Mg, Mg) units. The layers are connected by edge-sharing O4 atoms of (Ti1/Mg1)O6 and Mg2O6 octahedra into a three-dimensional framework. B1 atoms are located in triangular prismatic tunnels of the framework.

Bond valence sums (BVS; Brown & Altermatt, 1985) of the Mg, Ti and B atoms were calculated with the bond valence parameters of 1.693 Å for Mg2+, 1.815 Å for Ti4+ and 1.371 Å for B3+ (Brese & O'Keeffe, 1991). The BVS values of the Mg2 and B1 atoms were 2.1 and 2.9, respectively. Those of the Ti1 and Mg1 atoms at the Ti1/Mg1 site were 3.22 and 2.31, respectively. The average of these value is 2.8 and close to the expected mean valence (+3) of Mg2+ and Ti4+. The B1—O distances of 1.353 (3)–1.395 (3) Å agree well with those of isotypic Co3MO2(BO3)2 (M = Ti, Zr): 1.36 (2)–1.39 (2) Å (Utzolino & Bluhm, 1995).

Warwickite-type Mg3TiO2(BO3)2 did not emit visible light under ultraviolet excitation at room temperature, while ludwigite-type Mg5TiO4(BO3)2 shows broad blue emission (435 nm) attributed to charge transfer transitions between Ti4+ and O2– (Konijnendijk & Blasse, 1985).

Experimental

Starting materials were powders of MgO (99.9%, Rare Metallic), TiO2 (99.9%, Rare Metallic) and H3BO3 (99.99%, Sigma-Aldrich). MgO was heated at 1173–1273 K for 6–12 h in air before weighing. The powders were weighed with a molar ratio of MgO: TiO2: H3BO3 = 5: 1: 2.7 and mixed in an agate mortar with a pestle. The mixture was pressed into a pellet, placed in a Pt boat and heated at 1623 K for 6 h in air. Heating and cooling rates were 200 and 900 K/h, respectively. About 400 mg of the sample and 100 mg of H3BO3 were weighed and mixed. The mixture in the Pt boat was heated at 1723 K for 3 h in air and cooled to room temperature at a cooling rate of 900 K/h. The obtained sample was crushed into fragments and a colourless and transparent single-crystal of about 0.12–0.17 mm was picked up under an optical microscope.

Refinement

The crystal structures of natural warwickites were described in the space group Pnam (no. 62) in the previous studies (Takéuchi et al., 1950; Moore & Araki, 1974). The original single-crystal X-ray diffraction data in the present study were indexed in a different setting in space group Pmnb and unit-cell parameters of a = 3.10080 (14), b = 9.3013 (5) and c = 9.3914 (6) Å. Structure parameters were eventually standardized based on the standard setting of the space group Pnma using the STRUCTURE TIDY program (Gelato & Parthé, 1987). In the final refinement, site occupation factors (s.o.f.'s) of the Ti and Mg atoms at the Ti1/Mg1 and Mg2 sites were fixed to 0.5/0.5 and 1.0, respectively, since the freely refined s.o.f.'s of the Ti and Mg atoms at the Ti1/Mg1 site were close to 1/2, and the s.o.f. of the Mg atom at the Mg2 site was about 1.0. The highest peak in the difference electron density map is 0.36 Å from O2 while the deepest hole is -0.59 Å from Ti1/Mg1.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The atomic arrangement around Mg, Ti, B and O atoms in the structure of Mg3TiO2(BO3)2. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 95% probability level. Symmetry codes: (i) –x + 1/2, –y, z–1/2; (ii) –x + 1/2, –y + 1, z–1/2; (iii) x–1/2, y, –z + 1/2; (iv) –x, –y, –z + 1; (v) –x, –y + 1, –z + 1; (vi) x–1/2, y, –z + 3/2; (vii) –x + 1/2, –y + 1, z + 1/2; (viii) –x + 1/2, –y, z + 1/2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The crystal structure of Mg3TiO2(BO3)2 in a representation using cation-centred oxygen polyhedra.

Crystal data

Mg3TiO2(BO3)2 F(000) = 264
Mr = 270.45 Dx = 3.316 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pnma Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2n Cell parameters from 2288 reflections
a = 9.3013 (5) Å θ = 3.1–27.5°
b = 3.10080 (14) Å µ = 1.94 mm1
c = 9.3914 (6) Å T = 293 K
V = 270.86 (3) Å3 Block, colourless
Z = 2 0.17 × 0.17 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID II diffractometer 364 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 348 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.018
Detector resolution: 10.0 pixels mm-1 θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
ω scans h = −12→11
Absorption correction: numerical (NUMABS; Higashi, 1999) k = −3→3
Tmin = 0.791, Tmax = 0.839 l = −12→12
2510 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0347P)2 + 0.3981P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.070 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.20 Δρmax = 0.36 e Å3
364 reflections Δρmin = −0.59 e Å3
44 parameters Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraints Extinction coefficient: 0.039 (7)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq Occ. (<1)
Ti1 0.11388 (7) 0.2500 0.07167 (7) 0.0115 (3) 0.50
Mg1 0.11388 (7) 0.2500 0.07167 (7) 0.0115 (3) 0.50
Mg2 0.10160 (8) 0.2500 0.68497 (9) 0.0055 (3)
B1 0.1708 (3) 0.2500 0.3719 (3) 0.0061 (5)
O1 0.24045 (19) 0.2500 0.50344 (18) 0.0088 (4)
O2 0.25030 (18) 0.2500 0.24622 (19) 0.0078 (4)
O3 0.0255 (2) 0.2500 0.36441 (19) 0.0100 (4)
O4 0.5095 (2) 0.2500 0.61439 (18) 0.0100 (4)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ti1 0.0148 (4) 0.0079 (4) 0.0119 (4) 0.000 −0.0015 (2) 0.000
Mg1 0.0148 (4) 0.0079 (4) 0.0119 (4) 0.000 −0.0015 (2) 0.000
Mg2 0.0040 (4) 0.0045 (5) 0.0079 (4) 0.000 0.0001 (3) 0.000
B1 0.0069 (12) 0.0038 (13) 0.0077 (12) 0.000 −0.0013 (9) 0.000
O1 0.0071 (8) 0.0139 (10) 0.0054 (7) 0.000 −0.0006 (6) 0.000
O2 0.0085 (8) 0.0090 (9) 0.0058 (7) 0.000 0.0004 (6) 0.000
O3 0.0063 (9) 0.0095 (10) 0.0143 (9) 0.000 −0.0017 (7) 0.000
O4 0.0102 (9) 0.0128 (10) 0.0071 (8) 0.000 −0.0020 (6) 0.000

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Ti1—O4i 1.9702 (12) Mg2—O4x 2.0698 (19)
Ti1—O4ii 1.9702 (12) Mg2—O1 2.1387 (19)
Ti1—O4iii 1.9989 (19) Mg2—O2xi 2.1522 (13)
Ti1—O2 2.0730 (18) Mg2—O2xii 2.1522 (13)
Ti1—O1ii 2.1565 (13) Mg2—Mg2vi 3.10080 (14)
Ti1—O1i 2.1565 (13) Mg2—Mg2vii 3.10080 (14)
Ti1—Ti1iv 2.9502 (11) Mg2—Ti1xi 3.2465 (9)
Ti1—Mg1iv 2.9502 (11) Mg2—Mg1xi 3.2465 (9)
Ti1—Ti1v 2.9502 (11) Mg2—Ti1xii 3.2465 (9)
Ti1—Mg1v 2.9502 (11) Mg2—Mg1xii 3.2465 (9)
Ti1—Ti1vi 3.10080 (14) B1—O3 1.353 (3)
Ti1—Ti1vii 3.10080 (14) B1—O2 1.393 (3)
Mg2—O3viii 2.0043 (12) B1—O1 1.395 (3)
Mg2—O3ix 2.0043 (12)
O4i—Ti1—O4ii 103.80 (9) Mg2—O1—Ti1xi 98.20 (6)
O4i—Ti1—O4iii 83.98 (6) B1—O1—Ti1xii 123.71 (9)
O4ii—Ti1—O4iii 83.98 (6) Mg2—O1—Ti1xii 98.20 (6)
O4i—Ti1—O2 101.28 (6) Mg1xi—O1—Ti1xii 91.94 (7)
O4ii—Ti1—O2 101.28 (6) Ti1xi—O1—Ti1xii 91.94 (7)
O4iii—Ti1—O2 171.31 (8) B1—O1—Mg1xii 123.71 (9)
O4i—Ti1—O1ii 172.87 (6) Mg2—O1—Mg1xii 98.20 (6)
O4ii—Ti1—O1ii 82.00 (5) Mg1xi—O1—Mg1xii 91.94 (7)
O4iii—Ti1—O1ii 92.60 (6) Ti1xi—O1—Mg1xii 91.94 (7)
O2—Ti1—O1ii 81.39 (6) B1—O2—Ti1 110.19 (15)
O4i—Ti1—O1i 82.00 (5) B1—O2—Mg2ii 124.49 (8)
O4ii—Ti1—O1i 172.87 (6) Ti1—O2—Mg2ii 100.40 (6)
O4iii—Ti1—O1i 92.60 (6) B1—O2—Mg2i 124.49 (8)
O2—Ti1—O1i 81.39 (6) Ti1—O2—Mg2i 100.40 (6)
O1ii—Ti1—O1i 91.94 (7) Mg2ii—O2—Mg2i 92.17 (7)
O3viii—Mg2—O3ix 101.34 (9) B1—O3—Mg2viii 126.96 (6)
O3viii—Mg2—O4x 88.08 (6) B1—O3—Mg2ix 126.96 (6)
O3ix—Mg2—O4x 88.08 (6) Mg2viii—O3—Mg2ix 101.34 (9)
O3viii—Mg2—O1 99.89 (7) Mg1xii—O4—Mg1xi 103.80 (9)
O3ix—Mg2—O1 99.89 (7) Ti1xii—O4—Mg1xi 103.80 (9)
O4x—Mg2—O1 167.30 (8) Mg1xii—O4—Ti1xi 103.80 (9)
O3viii—Mg2—O2xi 175.34 (6) Ti1xii—O4—Ti1xi 103.80 (9)
O3ix—Mg2—O2xi 83.24 (5) Mg1xii—O4—Mg1xiii 96.02 (6)
O4x—Mg2—O2xi 91.24 (6) Ti1xii—O4—Mg1xiii 96.02 (6)
O1—Mg2—O2xi 80.01 (6) Mg1xi—O4—Mg1xiii 96.02 (6)
O3viii—Mg2—O2xii 83.24 (5) Ti1xi—O4—Mg1xiii 96.02 (6)
O3ix—Mg2—O2xii 175.34 (6) Mg1xii—O4—Ti1xiii 96.02 (6)
O4x—Mg2—O2xii 91.24 (6) Ti1xii—O4—Ti1xiii 96.02 (6)
O1—Mg2—O2xii 80.01 (6) Mg1xi—O4—Ti1xiii 96.02 (6)
O2xi—Mg2—O2xii 92.17 (7) Ti1xi—O4—Ti1xiii 96.02 (6)
O3—B1—O2 119.1 (2) g1xii—O4—Mg2xiv 115.24 (6)
O3—B1—O1 120.7 (2) Ti1xii—O4—Mg2xiv 115.24 (6)
O2—B1—O1 120.3 (2) Mg1xi—O4—Mg2xiv 115.24 (6)
B1—O1—Mg2 115.18 (15) Ti1xi—O4—Mg2xiv 115.24 (6)
B1—O1—Mg1xi 123.71 (9) Mg1xiii—O4—Mg2xiv 126.50 (10)
Mg2—O1—Mg1xi 98.20 (6) Ti1xiii—O4—Mg2xiv 126.50 (10)
B1—O1—Ti1xi 123.71 (9)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y, z−1/2; (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1, z−1/2; (iii) x−1/2, y, −z+1/2; (iv) −x, −y, −z; (v) −x, −y+1, −z; (vi) x, y+1, z; (vii) x, y−1, z; (viii) −x, −y, −z+1; (ix) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (x) x−1/2, y, −z+3/2; (xi) −x+1/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (xii) −x+1/2, −y, z+1/2; (xiii) x+1/2, y, −z+1/2; (xiv) x+1/2, y, −z+3/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: WM2443).

References

  1. Brese, N. E. & O’Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192–197.
  2. Brown, I. D. & Altermatt, D. (1985). Acta Cryst. B41, 244–247.
  3. Burla, M. C., Caliandro, R., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., De Caro, L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (2005). J. Appl. Cryst. 38, 381–388.
  4. Gelato, L. M. & Parthé, E. (1987). J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 139–143.
  5. Higashi, T. (1999). NUMABS Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  6. Kawano, T. & Yamane, H. (2010). Acta Cryst. C66, i92–i94. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Konijnendijk, W. L. & Blasse, G. (1985). Mater. Chem. Phys. 12, 591–599.
  8. Momma, K. & Izumi, F. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 653–658.
  9. Moore, P. B. & Araki, T. (1974). Am. Mineral. 59, 985–1004.
  10. Rigaku/MSC (2005). PROCESS-AUTO Rigaku/MSC Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Takéuchi, Y., Watanabé, T. & Ito, T. (1950). Acta Cryst. 3, 98–107.
  13. Utzolino, A. & Bluhm, K. (1995). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 50, 1653–1657.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811002157/wm2443sup1.cif

e-67-00i18-sup1.cif (15.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811002157/wm2443Isup2.hkl

e-67-00i18-Isup2.hkl (18.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES