Abstract
Genome sequencing has revealed that fungi have the ability to synthesize many more natural products (NPs) than are currently known, but methods for obtaining suitable expression of NPs have been inadequate. We have developed a successful strategy that bypasses normal regulatory mechanisms. By efficient gene targeting, we have replaced, en masse, the promoters of non-reducing polyketide synthase (NR-PKS) genes, key genes in NP biosynthetic pathways and other genes necessary for NR-PKS product formation or release. This has allowed us to determine the products of eight NR-PKSs of A. nidulans, including seven novel compounds, as well as the NR-PKS genes required for the synthesis of the toxins, alternariol (8) and cichorine (19).
INTRODUCTION
Fungal natural products (NPs) are an important source of medically important compounds and sequencing projects have revealed that many fungal genomes contain large numbers of clusters of genes that are predicted to encode NP biosynthetic pathways.1,2 The number of predicted NP biosynthetic pathways for each species far exceeds the known number of natural products and there is great variation in NP gene clusters among species. Fungi, thus, have the capacity to produce many more NPs than are currently known and precedence indicates that many of them have remarkably useful medical activities. Most fungal biosynthetic pathways are cryptic, however, producing no products under normal laboratory growth conditions.3,4
Several approaches have been employed to obtain expression of orphan pathways.3–5 One approach has been to alter genes involved in chromatin packing to induce expression.6 While this has worked to a limited extent, this approach, so far has not lead to the expression of most NP gene clusters. Other approaches such as altering media7 or co-culturing with bacteria8 have produced some successes, but the great majority of NP gene clusters have not responded to these approaches. Clearly, to unlock the treasure house of natural products that fungi can produce, we need to have a more generally successful approach to fungal NP production.
One promising approach takes advantage of the fact that fungal natural product gene clusters often contain transcription factors that govern expression of all genes in the cluster.9 Replacing the promoters of these transcription factors with regulatable promoters has allowed the induction of expression of three clusters in A. nidulans that encode biosynthetic pathways for aspyridones,9 emodin derivatives,6,10 and asperfuranone11 (Table 1). Since this approach has been successful for us and for others, we wished to determine if this approach was generally applicable. We found, however, that in most cases induction of these transcription factors did not result in induction of useful amounts of NPs. We consequently developed an alternative strategy, completely bypassing normal regulation, in which we directly replaced the promoters of non-reducing polyketide synthase (NR-PKS) genes, key genes of NP biosynthetic pathways as well as other genes required for compound production or release.12,13 Because we did not replace the promoters of genes that may modify the products of the NR-PKS, we did not anticipate that we would obtain production of the final products of the NP biosynthetic pathways. We did, however, hope to identify novel compounds and develop a better understanding of NR-PKS function.
Table 1.
Promoter replaced putative transcription factors associated with NP gene clusters.
| PKS or NRPS | Promoter replaced putative transcription factors | product induced |
|---|---|---|
| ANID_00150.1 (NR-PKS, MdpG) | ANID_00148.1 (MdpE) | emodin derivatives6,10 |
| ANID_10021.1 (MdpA) | n.d.6,10 | |
| ANID_00148.1 (MdpE) & ANID_10021.1 (MdpA) | emodin derivatives6,10 | |
| ANID_00523.1 (NR-PKS) | AN0533.3 | n.d. |
| ANID_01034.1 (NR-PKS, AfoE), ANID_01036.1 (HR-PKS, AfoG) | ANID_01029.1 (AfoA) | Asperfuranone11 |
| ANID_01680.1 (NRPS like) | ANID_01678.1 | n.d. |
| ANID_02032.1 (NR-PKS), ANID_02035.1 (HR-PKS) | ANID_02025.1 | low |
| ANID_02026.1 | low | |
| AN2036.3 | low | |
| ANID_02025.1 & AN2036.3 | low | |
| ANID_02924.1 (NRPS like) | ANID_02919.1 | n.d. |
| ANID_03386.1 (NR-PKS), ANID_03396.1 (NRPS like) | AN3385.3 | low |
| ANID_03391.1 | n.d. | |
| AN3385.3 & ANID_03391.1 | low | |
| ANID_03495.1 (NRPS), ANID_03496.1 (NRPS) | AN3501.3 | n.d. |
| ANID_03502.1 | n.d. | |
| AN3501.3 & ANID_03502.1 | low | |
| ANID_03506.1 | n.d. | |
| ANID_10486.1 (NRPS) | AN3911.3 | n.d. |
| ANID_10491.1 | n.d. | |
| ANID_06431.1 (HR-PKS) | AN6430.3 | n.d. |
| ANID_06791.1 (HR-PKS) | ANID_06788.1 | n.d. |
| ANID_06790.1 | n.d. | |
| ANID_07071.1 (NR-PKS) | ANID_07061.1 | n.d. |
| AN7073.3 | n.d. | |
| ANID_07061.1 & AN7073.3 | n.d. | |
| ANID_08105.1 (NRPS like) | AN8103.3 | n.d. |
| ANID_08111.1 | n.d. | |
| AN8103.3 & ANID_08111.1 | n.d. | |
| ANID_08412.1 (PKS-NRPS, ApdA) | ANID_08414.1 (ApdR) | aspyridones9 |
| ANID_08513.1 (NRPS, TdiA) | ANID_08506.1 | low |
| ANID_08509.1 | n.d. | |
| ANID_08910.1 (HR-PKS) | AN8916.3 | n.d. |
| AN8918.3 | n.d. | |
| AN8916.3 & AN8918.3 | n.d. | |
| ANID_11191.1 (HR-PKS), ANID_09226.1 (NRPS) | ANID_09221.1 | n.d. |
| ANID_09236.1 | low | |
| ANID_09221.1 & ANID_09236.1 | low |
In some cases there are two or more putative transcription factors associated with a single NP gene clusters. In those cases we replaced the promoters of each transcription factor individually with the alcA promoter and both of the transcription factors in combination. Named products are from previous studies in our labs and others. The remainder of the promoter replacements were carried out in this study (Supplementary Table S3 and Figure S1). n.d. indicates no product was detected. Low indicates that detectable products were produced but in amounts too low to allow analysis. The annotations of some transcription factors changed over the course of these experiments. Genes beginning with ANID are based on the Broad Institute annotation (http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/aspergillus_group/MultiHome.html). Genes beginning with AN are based on the .3 annotation on the CADRE database. (http://www.cadre-genomes.org.uk/index.html).
We report here that this approach is highly successful. It has allowed us to complete the determination of the products of eight NR-PKS genes of A. nidulans. We have discovered seven novel compounds and our findings have allowed us to determine the NR-PKS genes required for synthesis of cichorine (19), a phytotoxin produced by A. nidulans,14 and of alternariol (8),15 an important toxic contaminant of cereals and fruits not previously known to be produced by Aspergillus sp. Our approach should allow the discovery of products of other NP gene clusters, the production of large amounts of NPs from target clusters, and facilitate the prediction of chemical structures of the products of novel NR-PKS identified in fungal genome projects.
RESULTS
We took advantage of progress in generating transforming fragments by fusion PCR and in gene targeting in A. nidulans16,17 to replace the promoters of all putative transcription factors (TFs) associated with NP clusters in A. nidulans that have not previously been studied (Table 1). We replaced them with the regulatable promoter from the alcA gene18 using the strategy shown in Figure 1A. The alcA promoter allows us to repress expression of genes while the strain germinates and grows, and then induce the expression to very high levels. This allows us, in principle, to induce production of compounds that might be toxic to the producing strain. In instances in which the TFs are predicted on the basis of sequence to involve proteins encoded by two genes, we replaced the promoters of both genes. In some cases multiple putative TFs are associated with a single NP cluster and in those cases we replaced the promoters of each TF. In all, we created 33 new combinations of single and multiple TF promoter replacements for NP clusters for which the products are unknown. We then induced expression of the TFs and analyzed organic extracts for production of new NP by HPLC-DAD-MS (Supplementary Figure S1). Among seventeen clusters studied, induction of TFs in nine did not result in production of any detectable new NPs; and in five clusters, induction of one or more TFs resulted in the production of new NPs but in amounts too small to be isolated and structurally characterized by NMR (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S1). This strategy, thus, does not result in adequate up regulation of most NP clusters that contain transcription factors.
Figure 1.
Promoter replacement strategies. A. Single promoter replacement strategy. i. A transforming sequence generated by fusion PCR. It consists of a sequence upstream of the target gene, a selectable marker such as the pyrG gene from Aspergillus fumigatus (AfpyrG), the alcA promoter (alcA(p)) and all or a portion of the target gene. In the present study, the upstream sequence and the portion of the target gene were about 1kb each in length. Transformation with this fragment results in homologous recombination with the chromosomal locus (ii) and replacement of the promoter of the target gene with a selectable marker and the alcA promoter, placing the target gene under the control of the alcA promoter (iii). This strategy was used to replace the promoters of transcription factors, NR-PKS and other genes of NP gene clusters. B. Dual promoter replacement strategy. Fatty acid synthase subunits such as ANID_03381.1 and ANID_03380.1 are generally divergently transcribed in A. nidulans. Two fragments were created by fusion PCR (i). One contained a portion of one target gene (ANID_03381.1) fused to alcA(p) and a portion of the AfpyrG gene. The second contained a second, overlapping, portion of the AfpryG gene and alcA(p) fused to the second target gene (ANID_03380.1). Upon transformation, recombination between the target genes on the transforming fragments and the chromosomal genes (ii) and between the overlapping fragments of AfpyrG results in both target genes being driven by alcA(p) (iii).
Clearly, to unlock the treasure house of natural products that fungi can produce, we needed to have a more generally successful approach for fungal NP production. Given the efficiency of gene targeting that is now possible in A. nidulans, we reasoned that the systematic replacement of native promoters of unknown NP genes in A. nidulans with the regulatable alcA promoter would provide expression levels suitable to identify new NPs. To determine if bypassing normal NP regulatory mechanisms was feasible and practical, we focused our attention on NR-PKSs.
Fungal polyketide synthases (PKS)12,19 are key NP genes and they are abundant in the A. nidulans genome. We analyzed all 29 A. nidulans PKS genes and classified them into 14 NR-PKSs, 13 highly reducing PKSs (HR-PKSs), one HR-PKS lacking an enoyl reductase (ER) domain, and one hybrid PKS-non-ribosomal peptide synthetase, based on phylogeny and their domain architectures (Supplementary Figure S2). As discussed below, we were able to further divide the NR-PKSs into seven groups based on phylogeny, domain structure and known products (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S1, and Figure S3).
Figure 2.
The NR-PKSs of A. nidulans, their biosynthetic characteristics and their products. Domain abbreviations: SAT = starter unit-ACP transacylase, KS = ketosynthase, AT = acyl transferase, PT = product template, ACP = acyl carrier protein, TE = thioesterase, TE/CLC = thioesterase/Claisen cyclase, CMeT = C-methyltransferase, R = reductase, β-TE = β-lactamase-type thioesterase. With respect to domain structure, domains encircled with a dotted line are present in some cases and not others. With respect to starter unit, it has been proposed that the Cys or Ser in the GXCXG or GXSXG motif in the SAT domain is responsible for transferring the starter unit by using thioester or oxyester chemistry, respectively.44 The GXGXG motif in the SAT domain might be inactive or have an unknown function. Most NR-PKSs identified from the A. nidulans genome have GXCXG motif except for AptA and AN07071.1 that have a GXSXG motif, and MdpG and OrsA that have a GXGXG motif in their SAT domains. Release mechanisms: TE cleaves the thioester bond and releases the acid product; TE/CLC releases the product without the acid functional group via intramolecular Claisen cyclization; β-TE cleaves the thioester bond and releases the acid product but cleavage is due to a protein acting in trans, not to a domain of the NR-PKS (the protein acting in trans is listed in each case); R cleaves the product via reductive release such that the product has an aldehyde group. With respect to downstream products, for previously published studies only the final product of the pathway is listed. StcJ (ANID_07815.1) and StcK (ANID_07814.1), and PkiB (ANID_03380.1) and PkiC (ANID_03381.1) are FASs that synthesize starter units for StcA and PkiA, respectively. AfoG (ANID_01036.1) and PkhB (ANID_02035.1) are HR-PKSs that synthesize starter units for AfoE and PkhA, respectively. AptB (ANID_06001.1), MdpF (ANID_00149.1), and PkgB (ANID_07070.1) are β-TE nearby the NR-PKSs, AptA, MdpG, and PkgA, respectively. AptC (ANID_06002.1) is a C2-hydroxylase in the Apt cluster.24 Note: Induction of ANID_07071.1 resulted in production of compound 9–13. However, compounds 12 and 13 were found in small amounts. These compounds result from incorporation of five Mal-CoAs and they indicate that although ANID_07071.1 is a heptaketide synthase, it is not strict with respect to the number of Mal-CoA molecules incorporated. Compound 18 is a self released shunt product after incorporating three Mal-CoAs and one SAM.
A great deal of work by several labs over many years19 has revealed the chemical products of six A. nidulans NR-PKSs (StcA,20,21 WA,22 MdpG,6,10,14 AptA,23,24 OrsA,6,8,25 and AfoE11) (Figure 2). To determine the products of the remaining eight NR-PKSs, we replaced their native promoters with the alcA promoter18 (Resulting strains are listed in Supplementary Table S3). We carried out the replacements in strains in which the production of the major natural product sterigmatocystin was eliminated.6 This simplifies analysis and we anticipated that, in some cases, elimination of sterigmatocystin production would free up subunits for incorporation into other NPs. Strains were grown in inducing conditions and natural products extracted from the medium or mycelia were subjected to HPLC-DAD-MS metabolite profiling (Figure 3). Gratifyingly, replacement of the promoters of five NR-PKS genes (ANID_06448.1, ANID_08383.1, ANID_00523.1, ANID_07903.1, and ANID_03230.1 using the Broad Institute gene designations (http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/aspergillus_group/MultiHome.html) resulted in the production of at least one major compound upon induction of the alcA promoter. We designate these genes pkbA (ANID_06448.1), pkdA (ANID_00523.1), pkeA (ANID_07903.1), pkfA (ANID_03230.1). The gene ANID_08383.1 has been designated ausA previously.26,27 All the major polyketides produced were purified from large-scale cultures and the structures elucidated by spectroscopic methods (Supplementary Figure S6, for details on structural elucidation, see Supporting Information). These compounds are listed in Figure 2 (compounds 1– 7).
Figure 3.
Total scan HPLC profiles of natural products extracted from the culture medium and mycelium of alcA promoter replaced strains. Peaks that also present in the stcJΔ control strain are indicated with an asterisk (*) and are considered not to be specific to the NR-PKS activated. Peaks that are specifically present in induced NR-PKS promoter replacement strains but are not structurally elucidated due to low yield or poor stability are marked with a dagger (†).
Induction of ANID_07071.1 resulted in the production of several NPs but all in small amounts (Figure 3). ANID_07071.1 does not contain a releasing domain, and, based on previous data,28 we hypothesized that another gene in the cluster is required for product release. ANID_07070.1, which is adjacent to ANID_07071.1, encodes a β-lactamase-type thioesterase that potentially might be involved in product release. We created a strain in which both the promoters of ANID_07071.1 and ANID_07070.1 were replaced with the alcA promoter. As hypothesized, induction of this strain resulted in a dramatically increased yield (Figure 3). We designate ANID_07071.1 pkgA and ANID_07070.1 pkgB. A larger scale induction of an ANID_07071.1 and ANID_07070.1 promoter replacement strain followed by extensive chromatography led to the isolation of two major compounds, alternariol (8),15 an important toxin with antifungal, phytotoxic and anti-cholinesterase activity previously reported from Alternaria sp., and dehydrocitreoisocoumarin (9), as well as four minor compounds including two heptaketide isocoumarins (10 and 11) and two hexaketide isocoumarins (12 and 13). It is interesting to note that ANID_07071.1 and WA both are heptaketide synthases. Instead of the intramolecular Claisen cyclization that occurs in WA which has a functional TE/CLC domain,29 with ANID_07071.1, which lacks a TE/CLC domain, the released heptaketide undergoes lactonization to produce 9, which converts to 8 in vivo (Figure 2).
The fact that induction of the two remaining NR-PKS genes, ANID_02032.1 and ANID_03386.1, did not produce compounds suggested that coexpression of nearby genes might be necessary to provide specialized starter units for these NR-PKSs.11,30 ANID_02032.1 is located next to an HR-PKS, ANID_02035.1, and ANID_03386.1 is located near ANID_03380.1 and ANID_03381.1, putative α and β subunits of a fatty acid synthase (FAS). We created a strain where both the promoters of the NR-PKS ANID_02032.1 and the HR-PKS ANID_02035.1 were replaced with the alcA promoter. The resulting strain produced at least two UV-Vis detectable compounds upon induction, although in very small amounts (Figure 3). We designate ANID_02032.1 pkhA and ANID_02035.1 pkhB. We were able to isolate one major compound, 2,4-dihydroxy-6-[(3E,5E,7E)-2-oxonona-3,5,7-trienyl]benzaldehyde (14) (Figure 2), from the scale-up culture when we lowered the induction temperature from 37 °C to 30 °C and extended the incubation time from 48 hr to 72 hr (Figure 3). Our data thus indicate that the HR-PKS, ANID_02035.1, produces the octatrienoyl starter that is loaded onto the SAT domain of the NR-PKS, ANID_02032.1 (Figure 2).
We created a strain where the promoters of ANID_03386.1 and the two FAS subunit genes ANID_03380.1 and ANID_03381.1, were all replaced with the alcA promoter. The two FAS subunits are divergently transcribed and we developed a procedure to replace the promoters of both genes using a single selectable marker (Figure 1B). Induced expression of all three genes led to the isolation of a major product, 2,4-dihydroxy-3-methyl-6-(2-oxoundecyl)benzaldehyde (15), from the mycelium (Figure 3). We also isolated compounds 16 and 17 from the mycelium and 18 from the medium (Figure 2). We designate ANID_03386.1 pkiA, ANID_03380.1 pkiB, and ANID_03381.1 pkiC. These data indicate that a decanoyl starter unit is first synthesized by the FAS (ANID_03380.1 and ANID_03381.1) and then loaded onto ANID_03386.1. Since we did not detect any decanoic acid, the decanoyl starter is likely to be transferred directly from the FAS to the SAT domain of ANID_03386.1, similar to the biosynthesis of norsolorinic acid anthrone.31 Compound 15 is then transaminated and aromatized to become 16, which is then oxidized to generate 17. The minor compound 18, thus, is a shunt product (Figure 2).
Based on these data, we were able to determine the PKSs required for the production of three A. nidulans natural products, a process that is often difficult and time-consuming. A labeled precursor approach32 has revealed that 3,5-dimethylorsellinic acid (3) (Figure 2) is the precursor of austinol and dehydroaustinol, two meroterpenoids isolated from A. nidulans.23 The fact that 3,5-dimethylorsellinic acid (3) is the product of ANID_08383.1, suggested that this PKS is required for the synthesis of these meroterpenoids. This has recently been confirmed by another group and by us.26,27 We have recently isolated the phytotoxin cichorine (19) (Figure 2) from A. nidulans.14 The chemical structure of cichorine suggested it might be synthesized by modification of the product of ANID_06448.1, i.e. compound 1. We deleted ANID_06448.1, and found that cichorine production was, indeed, eliminated (Supplementary Figure S7). ANID_06448.1 is, thus, the PKS responsible for cichorine biosynthesis.
Phylogenetic Relationships of NR-PKSs and Carbon Skeletons of their Products
The genus Aspergillus contains more than 150 species and many of them are potent producers of NP.33 The sequencing of the genomes of members of this genus presents an opportunity to tap this potentially rich source of important compounds, but a key missing element for the many species without developed molecular genetics systems is the ability to correlate NP gene clusters with their products easily. For example, if a species with a sequenced genome, but no molecular genetic system, was found to produce a potentially useful compound, but only at low levels, it would be difficult to exploit the potential utility of the compound. The ability to predict which PKS is essential for the production of the product might allow one to identify the gene cluster responsible for the production of the product and this cluster could be cloned and expressed heterologously to produce the desired compound in larger amounts.
Our data greatly expand the knowledge of polyketides produced by NR-PKSs in A. nidulans and we wondered whether our data in combination with sequence information might allow us to make useful predictions about the products of NR-PKSs in other Aspergillus species. We reasoned that a phylogenetic analysis of NR-PKSs might be useful because such an analysis includes key information on the presence, absence and order of functional NR-PKS domains. We used a previous phylogenetic analysis of KS domains by Kroken et al. as a starting point for our analyses.34 The analysis of Kroken et al. classified NR-PKSs into three subclades. Subclade I and II NR-PKSs do not contain a methyltransferase (CMeT) domain and are associated with aflatoxin and melanin biosynthesis, respectively. It should be noted that when this initial analysis was made, no product was associated with any of the NR-PKS in subclade III, which are NR-PKSs that contain CMeT domains. Since the product template (PT) domain embedded in the middle of the NR-PKSs has been shown to control regioselective cyclization,35–37 Li et al. further categorized subclade I and II NR-PKSs into five major groups with each group corresponding to a unique product size or cyclization regioselectivity using PT phylogeny.38
In this study, we have identified the products of eight NR-PKSs in A. nidulans and consequently have greatly increased the number of fungal NR-PKSs for which the products are known. In particular, we have increased the number of NR-PKSs in subclade III with associated products and this has now allowed us to further classify subclade III into groups VI and VII (Supplementary Figure S3). All group VI and VII NR-PKSs analyzed so far produce monocyclic aromatics with C2–C7 cyclization regioselectivity (Figure 2). Noticeably, some CMeT domainless NR-PKSs like ANID_03230.1 and ANID_02032.1 fell into group VII. These NR-PKSs produce monocyclic aromatics without methyl branching on their benzene rings (Figure 2). We further performed phylogenetic analysis of PT domains extracted from the known NR-PKSs and found, interestingly, that the phylogeny obtained using the PT domains is similar to the phylogeny obtained using simply the full length NR-PKS (Supplementary Table S1, Figure S3, and S4). Our analysis showed that NR-PKSs within the same group produce similar polyketides except NR-PKSs belonging to group V, which lacks the product-releasing domain. NR-PKSs in group V seem to produce the most diverse aromatic polyketides. They require separate genes to release their products and they generate multicyclic aromatics with various chain lengths and cyclization regioselectivities. The known NR-PKSs in group V include hepta- (ANID_07071.1 and GsfA39), octa- (ACAS28 and MdpG10), nona- (AptA24 and VrtA39), and decaketide synthases (AdaA24) with C2–C7 (ANID_07071.1), C6-C1 (GsfA), and C6-C11 (ACAS, MdpG, AptA, VrtA, and AdaA) cyclization modes.
To determine if the phylogenetic analysis we have done in A. nidulans could be applied more broadly to Aspergillus NR-PKSs sequenced so far, we analyzed 71 fungal NR-PKSs available at the Broad Institute Aspergillus Comparative Database (Supplementary Table S2 and Figure 4). Gratifyingly, 69 of 71 NR-PKSs from the Aspergillus Comparative Database fell into these seven groups. The only two outliers are AFL2G_04689 and AO090023000877 which are more similar to MSAS, a PR-PKS from A. terreus.40 Among 51 unknown NR-PKSs analyzed, 48 fell into groups III ~ VII, and the previously underrepresented groups VI and VII contained the greatest number of NR-PKSs. Although currently it is still not possible to predict the exact product of the NR-PKS using bioinformatics analysis alone, our data shows that at least for Aspergillus species genome sequenced so far, 69 of 71 NR-PKSs with canonical domain architectures can be grouped into these seven groups and, with the exception of group V, the polyketide products of the PKSs within each group are structurally similar. This is an important step for genome mining of aromatic polyketides biosynthesis genes in Aspergillus species with sequenced genomes because if a valuable compound is identified, the structure of the compound will, in many cases, narrow the search for NR-PKSs responsible for its production into a particular phylogenetic group containing only a few members.
Figure 4.
Phylogenetic analysis of all NR-PKSs obtained from the Broad Institute Aspergillus Comparative Database (http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/aspergillus_group/MultiHome.html). NR-PKSs from A. nidulans are labeled in boldface. Domain architectures of protein sequences are list in Table S3. A. terreus MSAS, a PR-PKS, was used as the outgroup. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree.
DISCUSSION
The approach we have developed has allowed us to complete the determination of the products of aromatic polyketide synthases in A. nidulans, including seven novel compounds (4, 7, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18). This represents a major step in exploiting the diversity of fungal natural products coded in genomes. Several important conclusions can be drawn from our results. First, it is feasible and practical to investigate A. nidulans natural products by bypassing normal regulation. Indeed, much more time and effort was expended in analyzing products of the expression strains than in creating them. Our efforts have resulted in the discovery that A. nidulans can produce the important toxin alternariol (8), the identification of the PKS responsible for its synthesis, and the identification of the PKS responsible for cichorine (19) biosynthesis. Second, we have shown that serial promoter replacements are feasible, and not prohibitively time consuming, and, thus, that there are no conceptual barriers to up regulating all the genes of target clusters. Serial promoter replacement should allow the overproduction of the final products of target natural product gene clusters (when the promoters of all genes in the cluster are replaced) as well as intermediates in the pathways (when some of the genes in the cluster are replaced). Replacing the promoters of all genes in large clusters would require the development of additional selectable markers or techniques to recycle markers, but this is certainly feasible. This promises to be valuable in translating NP into products. Although we have focused initially on NR-PKSs, the approach should work for other classes of NP biosynthetic pathways and should be applicable to other fungal species with developed molecular genetic systems. Third, our data validate our previous suggestion that if a NR-PKS does not contain a releasing domain, a separate gene in the same cluster encoding a β-lactamase thioesterase is required for releasing the compound.23,28 This is true for three NR-PKSs in A. nidulans, and 23 of the 71 NR-PKSs in the Aspergillus species genomes sequenced so far lack product releasing domains. Seventeen of them have a β-lactamase thioesterase or an esterase gene nearby (Supplementary Table S2). Release of NR-PKS products by β-lactamase thioesterase genes separate from the NR-PKS thus appears to be common in Aspergillus species. Fourth, our data indicate that if an HR-PKS or FAS is present in a cluster with an NR-PKS, it is very likely to provide the starter unit loaded onto the SAT domain of the NR-PKS. This is true for A. nidulans NR-PKSs, and 17 of the 71 NR-PKS in the Aspergillus species genomes sequenced so far are in clusters with an HR-PKS or FAS (Supplementary Table S2). Production of starter units for NR-PKSs by HR-PKSs or FASs thus appears to be a frequent feature of fungal secondary metabolism. Fifth, our data in combination with previous data19,24 indicate that each of the 14 NR-PKSs in A. nidulans produces a unique product (Figure 2). This reveals that the PKS, themselves, generate a great deal of the diversity of fungal natural products. This diversity is then multiplied by the enzymes that modify the PKS products resulting, in principle, in huge numbers of different NPs. Finally, our results have greatly expanded the data on the products generated by fungal NR-PKSs and will facilitate genome mining efforts by narrowing down the number of target genes that need to be experimentally verified.
In view of previous data,6,9–11 we were surprised that up regulation of transcription factors generally yielded no or inadequate increases in compound production. We do not know why this was the case. It could be due to post-translational down regulation of the activity of the transcription factor as has been demonstrated for the AflR transcription factor,41 to other mechanisms of transcriptional inhibition as has been demonstrated in A. terreus,42 or to other, as yet unknown mechanisms. In any case, simple up regulation of transcription factors associated with SM clusters does not appear to be a generally successful strategy for obtaining expression of SM gene clusters.
CONCLUSION
We have developed a strategy that allows us to obtain expression of cryptic NP genes by bypassing normal regulatory mechanisms. Using this strategy we have successfully deciphered the products of eight NR-PKSs in A. nidulans. Furthermore, structural information derived from this work has allowed improved prediction of the carbon skeleton of aromatic polyketides from NR-PKS sequences through structure-phylogenetic analysis. This will greatly facilitate the elucidation of NR-PKS biosynthetic pathways in other fungal species.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Molecular genetic manipulations
Replacement of endogenous promoters with the alcA promoter was carried out as shown in Figure 1. Primers used in this study are listed in Supplemental Table S4. Transforming fragments were generated by fusion PCR as described16,17 except that in most cases KOD DNA polymerase (EMD Biosciences) was used instead of Accuprime Taq HiFi because of the stronger proofreading activity of KOD. With KOD enzyme, fusions were carried out at Tm (for the lowest melting temperature primer) + 2 °C and the extension time was 30 seconds per kb of expected fusion product. LO2026 (Supplemental Table S3) was used as a recipient strain for most transformations and the Aspergillus fumigatus pyrG (AfpyrG) and pyroA (AfpyroA) genes were used as selectable markers. For the ANID_03380.1; ANID_03381.1; ANID_03386.1 gene cluster, LO4389 was used as the recipient strain (Supplemental Table S3). Replacing the promoters of ANID_03380.1 and ANID_03381.1 presented a problem because the two genes (which encode fatty acid synthase subunits) are divergently transcribed and the distance between the two coding sequences is only about 600 bp. With our normal promoter replacement procedure, replacement of the promoter of one of the two genes with the alcA promoter would have been straightforward but subsequent replacement of the promoter of the second gene would have resulted in the deletion of the alcA promoter of the first gene. To circumvent this problem, we developed the procedure shown in Figure 1B. Fusion PCR was used to create two transforming fragments. One contained a portion of ANID_03381.1 fused to the alcA promoter and a fragment carrying a portion of the AfpyrG gene. The second contained a portion of the AfpyrG gene and the alcA promoter fused to ANID_03380.1. The two fragments of AfpyrG overlapped by 540 bp. Transformation resulted in ANID_03381.1 and ANID_03382.1 being driven by separate copies of the alcA promoter and fusion of the two portions of AfpyrG creating a full-length, functional copy. The ANID_08383.1 and ANID_06448.1 deletions strains were generated by replacing each gene with the Aspergillus fumigatus pyrG gene in the A. nidulans strain LO2026 (nkuAΔ, stcJΔ).9 The construction of fusion PCR products, protoplast production, and transformation were carried out as described previously,16,17 For the construction of the fusion PCR fragments, two 1,000-bp fragments of genomic A. nidulans DNA, upstream and downstream of the targeted gene, were amplified by PCR. All transformants were verified by diagnostic PCR (Supplemental Figure S5). Genotypes of all strains are given in Table S3 in the Supplemental Information.
Fermentation and LC/MS analysis
For alcA(p) induction, 30× 106 spores were grown in 30 ml liquid LMM medium (15 g/l lactose, 6g/l NaNO3, 0.52g/l KCl, 0.52g/l MgSO4·7H2O, 1.52g/l KH2PO4, 1 ml/l trace element) in 125 ml flasks at 37°C with shaking at 180 rpm and supplemented with uracil (1 g/ l), uridine (10 mM), riboflavin (2.5 mg/l), or pyridoxine (0.5 mg/l) when necessary. Cyclopentanone at a final concentration of 10 mM was added to the medium 18 hr after inoculation. Culture medium was collected 48 hr after cyclopentanone induction by filtration and extracted with the same volume of EtOAc twice. The mycelium collected was soaked in 50 ml of MeOH for one day. After removing the cell debris by filtration, MeOH was collected, concentrated, resuspended in 25 ml of ddH2O, and extracted with the same volume of EtOAc twice. EtOAc from the combined EtOAc layers was evaporated by TurboVap LV (Caliper LifeSciences). The crude extracts were then re-dissolved in 0.5 ml of DMSO:MeOH (1:4) and 10 μl was injected for LC-DAD-MS analysis as described previously.6
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Research in the Wang and Oakley Groups is supported in part by PO1-GM084077 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. The Oakley group is additionally supported by the University of Kansas Endowment Fund. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences or the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information. Details for large scale purifications of compounds from each strain; full characterization of new compounds; primer sequences; diagnostic PCR; and phylogenetic analyses. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Cuomo C, Ma LJ, Wortman JR, Batzoglou S, Lee SI, Basturkmen M, Spevak CC, Clutterbuck J, Kapitonov V, Jurka J, Scazzocchio C, Farman M, Butler J, Purcell S, Harris S, Braus GH, Draht O, Busch S, D’Enfert C, Bouchier C, Goldman GH, Bell-Pedersen D, Griffiths-Jones S, Doonan JH, Yu J, Vienken K, Pain A, Freitag M, Selker EU, Archer DB, Penalva MA, Oakley BR, Momany M, Tanaka T, Kumagai T, Asai K, Machida M, Nierman WC, Denning DW, Caddick M, Hynes M, Paoletti M, Fischer R, Miller B, Dyer P, Sachs MS, Osmani SA, Birren BW. Nature. 2005;438:1105–15. doi: 10.1038/nature04341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Keller NP, Turner G, Bennett JW. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:937–47. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chiang YM, Lee KH, Sanchez JF, Keller NP, Wang CC. Nat Prod Commun. 2009;4:1505–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scherlach K, Hertweck C. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7:1753–60. doi: 10.1039/b821578b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chiang YM, Chang SL, Oakley BR, Wang CC. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2011;15:137–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bok JW, Chiang YM, Szewczyk E, Reyes-Domingez Y, Davidson AD, Sanchez JF, Lo HC, Watanabe K, Strauss J, Oakley BR, Wang CC, Keller NP. Nat Chem Biol. 2009;5:462–464. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bode HB, Bethe B, Hofs R, Zeeck A. Chembiochem. 2002;3:619–27. doi: 10.1002/1439-7633(20020703)3:7<619::AID-CBIC619>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schroeckh V, Scherlach K, Nutzmann HW, Shelest E, Schmidt-Heck W, Schuemann J, Martin K, Hertweck C, Brakhage AA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:14558–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901870106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bergmann S, Schumann J, Scherlach K, Lange C, Brakhage AA, Hertweck C. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:213–7. doi: 10.1038/nchembio869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chiang YM, Szewczyk E, Davidson AD, Entwistle R, Keller NP, Wang CC, Oakley BR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:2067–74. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02187-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chiang YM, Szewczyk E, Davidson AD, Keller N, Oakley BR, Wang CC. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2965–70. doi: 10.1021/ja8088185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cox RJ. Org Biomol Chem. 2007;5:2010–26. doi: 10.1039/b704420h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Crawford JM, Townsend CA. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:879–89. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sanchez JF, Entwistle R, Hung JH, Yaegashi J, Jain S, Chiang YM, Wang CC, Oakley BR. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:4010–7. doi: 10.1021/ja1096682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cole RJ, Cox RH, editors. Handbook of Toxic Fungal Metabolites. Academic Press; New York: 1981. p. 614. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nayak T, Szewczyk E, Oakley CE, Osmani A, Ukil L, Murray SL, Hynes MJ, Osmani SA, Oakley BR. Genetics. 2006;172:1557–66. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.052563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Szewczyk E, Nayak T, Oakley CE, Edgerton H, Xiong Y, Taheri-Talesh N, Osmani SA, Oakley BR. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:3111–20. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Felenbok B. J Biotechnol. 1991;17:11–7. doi: 10.1016/0168-1656(91)90023-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chiang YM, Oakley BR, Keller NP, Wang CC. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:1719–36. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2525-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Brown DW, Yu JH, Kelkar HS, Fernandes M, Nesbitt TC, Keller NP, Adams TH, Leonard TJ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:1418–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu JH, Leonard TJ. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:4792–800. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.16.4792-4800.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Watanabe A, Fujii I, Sankawa U, Mayorga ME, Timberlake WE, Ebizuka Y. Tetrahedron Letters. 1999;40:91–94. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Szewczyk E, Chiang YM, Oakley CE, Davidson AD, Wang CC, Oakley BR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:7607–12. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01743-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li Y, Chooi YH, Sheng Y, Valentine JS, Tang Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:15773–85. doi: 10.1021/ja206906d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sanchez JF, Chiang YM, Szewczyk E, Davidson AD, Ahuja M, Elizabeth Oakley C, Woo Bok J, Keller N, Oakley BR, Wang CC. Mol Biosyst. 2010;6:587–93. doi: 10.1039/b904541d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nielsen ML, Nielsen JB, Rank C, Klejnstrup ML, Holm DM, Brogaard KH, Hansen BG, Frisvad JC, Larsen TO, Mortensen UH. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;321:157–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lo HC, Entwistle R, Guo CJ, Ahuja M, Szewczyk E, Hung JH, Chiang YM, Oakley BR, Wang CC. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:4709–20. doi: 10.1021/ja209809t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Awakawa T, Yokota K, Funa N, Doi F, Mori N, Watanabe H, Horinouchi S. Chem Biol. 2009;16:613–23. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fujii I, Watanabe A, Sankawa U, Ebizuka Y. Chem Biol. 2001;8:189–97. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(00)90068-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Crawford JM, Dancy BC, Hill EA, Udwary DW, Townsend CA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:16728–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604112103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Watanabe CM, Townsend CA. Chem Biol. 2002;9:981–8. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(02)00213-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Simpson TJ, Stenzel DJ, Bartleet AJ, O’Brien E, Holker JSE. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans. 1982;1:2687–92. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Geiser DM, Klich MA, Frisvad JC, Peterson SW, Varga J, Samson RA. Stud Mycol. 2007;59:1–10. doi: 10.3114/sim.2007.59.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kroken S, Glass NL, Taylor JW, Yoder OC, Turgeon BG. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:15670–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2532165100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Crawford JM, Thomas PM, Scheerer JR, Vagstad AL, Kelleher NL, Townsend CA. Science. 2008;320:243–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1154711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Crawford JM, Korman TP, Labonte JW, Vagstad AL, Hill EA, Kamari-Bidkorpeh O, Tsai SC, Townsend CA. Nature. 2009;461:1139–43. doi: 10.1038/nature08475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu T, Chiang YM, Somoza AD, Oakley BR, Wang CC. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:13314–6. doi: 10.1021/ja205780g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li Y, Image Xu W, II, Image I, Tang Y. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:22764–73. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.128504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chooi YH, Cacho R, Tang Y. Chem Biol. 2010;17:483–94. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fujii I, Ono Y, Tada H, Gomi K, Ebizuka Y, Sankawa U. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;253:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s004380050289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shimizu K, Hicks JK, Huang TP, Keller NP. Genetics. 2003;165:1095–104. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.3.1095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gressler M, Zaehle C, Scherlach K, Hertweck C, Brock M. Chem Biol. 2011;18:198–209. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Scherlach K, Sarkar A, Schroeckh V, Dahse HM, Roth M, Brakhage AA, Horn U, Hertweck C. Chembiochem. 2011;12:1836–9. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201100132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Crawford JM, Vagstad AL, Ehrlich KC, Townsend CA. Bioorg Chem. 2008;36:16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





