Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064012

Molecular Epidemiology and Phylodynamics of the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Fusion Protein in Northern Taiwan

Hsin Chi 1,2,3,4, Hsin-Fu Liu 2,6, Li-Chuan Weng 2, Nai-Yu Wang 2, Nan-Chang Chiu 1,3, Mei-Ju Lai 5, Yung-Cheng Lin 6, Yu-Ying Chiu 7, Wen-Shyang Hsieh 8,9,10,*, Li-Min Huang 4,5,*
Editor: Ralph Tripp11
PMCID: PMC3667090  PMID: 23734183

Abstract

Background and Aims

The glycoprotein (G protein) and fusion protein (F protein) of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) both show genetic variability, but few studies have examined the F protein gene. This study aimed to characterize the molecular epidemiology and phylodynamics of the F protein gene in clinical RSV strains isolated in northern Taiwan from 2000–2011.

Methods

RSV isolates from children presenting with acute respiratory symptoms between July 2000 and June 2011 were typed based on F protein gene sequences. Phylogeny construction and evaluation were performed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods. Phylodynamic patterns in RSV F protein genes were analyzed using the Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo framework. Selection pressure on the F protein gene was detected using the Datamonkey website interface.

Results

From a total of 325 clinical RSV strains studied, phylogenetic analysis showed that 83 subgroup A strains (RSV-A) could be further divided into three clusters, whereas 58 subgroup B strains (RSV-B) had no significant clustering. Three amino acids were observed to differ between RSV-A and -B (positions 111, 113, and 114) in CTL HLA-B*57- and HLA-A*01-restricted epitopes. One positive selection site was observed in RSV-B, while none was observed in RSV-A. The evolution rate of the virus had very little change before 2000, then slowed down between 2000 and 2005, and evolved significantly faster after 2005. The dominant subtypes of RSV-A in each epidemic were replaced by different subtypes in the subsequent epidemic.

Conclusions

Before 2004, RSV-A infections were involved in several small epidemics and only very limited numbers of strains evolved and re-emerged in subsequent years. After 2005, the circulating RSV-A strains were different from those of the previous years and continued evolving through 2010. Phylodynamic pattern showed the evolutionary divergence of RSV increased significantly in the recent 5 years in northern Taiwan.

Introduction

Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection causes bronchiolitis and pneumonia and is the leading cause of hospitalization of infants and young children [1][6]. RSV, a member of the Paramyxoviridae family, is an enveloped virus with a nonsegmented, single-stranded, negative sense RNA genome [1], [7]. The most important antigenic proteins include the attachment glycoprotein (G protein) and the fusion glycoprotein (F protein), which mediate attachment to host cells and viral penetration, respectively [7]. Based on the G protein, RSV is classified into 2 major subgroups, RSV-A and RSV-B, and the both subgroups are further classified into genotypes based on genetic divergence [8], [9]. Antigenic variation between and within the two RSV subgroups may contribute to repeated RSV infections in an individual and the occurrence of annual epidemics by the evasion of pre-existing host immune responses to the G protein [9]. The amino acid variability in the G protein might be due to positive selection [10].

RSV F protein is synthesized as a precursor, F0, which is activated after being cleaved at two sites by furin-like intracellular host protease. The process yields an N-terminal F2 subunit, p27, and a C-terminal; membrane-anchored F1 subunit carrying the fusion peptide [7] and the F1 subunit is more conserved than F2 subunit [11]. The RSV F protein is highly conserved between subgroups A and B [7], [11] and is the principal antigen responsible for the protective immune response [12]. Virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) play a major role in the clearance of RSV infection, and several studies indicate that the F protein is a target for CTLs [13][15]. Two related human HLA class I-restricted epitopes, HLA-A*01 (109–118) [13] and HLA-B*57 (106–114) [14] have been identified and the CTL epitopes are subgroup A-specific [16]. The F protein is thus important to understand whether immune selection over consecutive epidemics occurs in its epitopes recognized by neutralizing antibodies and CTLs and of interest in the development of an RSV vaccine.

Phylogenetic analysis of RSV G protein in annual epidemics has demonstrated that both subgroups can circulate concurrently. Switching of the predominant genotypes occurs and it might be determined by local factors, especially the level of herd immunity to certain strains [17], [18]. Phylodynamic analyses of viral genetic data are increasingly used to elucidate how evolutionary and ecological processes can jointly drive fluctuations in the genetic diversity of viral populations and how the virus escapes host immune responses [19], [20]. Although the molecular epidemiology and evolutionary dynamics of RSV have been studied, most studies are one the G protein gene [21], [22]. The F protein is the major focus regarding prophylactic antibodies, and for subunit or recombinant vaccine research [23][25]. The antigenic variation and the evolutionary patterns of the F protein genes are still not known. We investigated the phylogenetic relationship, evolutionary variability, CTL epitopes and population dynamics of the RSV F protein gene in northern Taiwan throughten consecutive years.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Mackay Memorial Hospital Ethics Committee (IRB number: MMH-I-S-627, protocol title: Clinical Features of Pediatric Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections: Risk Factors and outcome). We retrospectively collected the demographic data including length of fever and hospital stay, oxygen use and laboratory results from the charts. Since the data were collected from the patients, who received regular medical management, by retrospective review of medical charts, a written informed consent from the patients was waived.

Patients and Samples

RSV were obtained from virus stocks collected between July 2000 and June 2011 from nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPAs) and throat swabs of 325 children, aged from 0.1 to 97.7 months, hospitalized with acute lower respiratory tract infection on the pediatric wards.

Viral Isolates

Virus cultures were performed via throat swabs with sterile cotton buds and NPA fluids from all subjects within 48 hours of hospitalization. The specimens were preserved in standard transport media and were inoculated on four cell lines (MRC-5 from fibroblast of human fetal lung, Hep-2, A549 from laryngeal carcinoma, and RD cell from rhabdomyosarcoma) for isolation of respiratory viruses. Those culture exhibiting RSV specific cytopathological effects were confirmed by reactions with immunofluorescent antibodies and were stored at −80°C [4].

Viral RNA Extraction and RT-PCR

The frozen stock viruses were recovered in HEp-2 cells and harvested from cultures when exhibited cytopathological effects in 80% of cells. RSV viral RNA was extracted from 200 µl cultured supernatant using the High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). cDNA synthesis was performed using random primers and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions were set according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR products were purified using QIA quick spin columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).

Subgroup Identification and Sequencing

Partial amplification of the RSV G protein gene was performed by PCR, using subgroup-specific primers. Specimens were classified by PCR as RSV-A or RSV-B [18]. The PCR products were 283 bp for human RSV-A and 900 bp for RSV-B. Amplification of the F protein gene was performed using a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems Inc.), using the following parameters: 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C, and finally a 7 min extension at 72°C. PCR primers were similar to the ones in a previous study by Kim et al [26]. The N-terminal portion of the F protein gene (nucleotides 3 to 1068 from the N-terminus) was amplified using the RSV-U primer (5′-GGCAAATAACAATGGAGTTG-3′) and the RSV-4R primer (5′-AAGAAAGATACTGATCCTG-3′). The PCR products were sequenced using the BigDye 3.1 Terminator cycle sequencing reagents on an ABI Prism 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Forest City, CA).

Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence Analysis

As a measurement of the variability of F protein gene, we calculated the percent identity of RSV F protein gene. Nucleotide and amino acid sequence were multiple aligned by using ClustalW implemented in the MEGA 5 software [27] and the reference strains were A2 (accession number FJ614814) and B1 (accession number AF013254). The jModeltest program was used to estimate the best-fitting nucleotide substitution model [28], [29]. The transition/transversion ratio, gamma-distributed rates, and base frequencies were estimated using the TREE-PUZZLE software version 5.2 [30]. Human HLA class I-restricted CTL epitopes was mapped to the RSV F protein. The position of published CTL epitopes were shaded manually with Genedoc version 2.6.002 (http://www.psc.edu/biomed/qenedoc/). The BIMAS CTL epitope prediction algorithm was used to predict putative CTL epitopes for the F protein [31].

Phylogenetic Analysis

The subgroup A and B RSV strains were analyzed separately. Nucleotide sequence (position 110–869) of the F protein gene was including in phylogenetic analysis. The nucleotide position is according to FJ614814. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods from the PHYLIP software package (version 3.69, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA) [32]. The reliability of the NJ tree topology was statistically evaluated by bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates. The genetic clusters were identified by using a bootstrap test with a cut-off of 75% [33]. The strains of short sequence length were excluded from phylogenetic analysis. Only one strain was chosen for analysis from each year when more than one strains had identical sequence in the region. There were 70 reference strains including reference strains A2 (accession number FJ614814) and B1 (accession number AF013254) and isolates from previously published studies included for phylogenetic analysis [11], [16], [26], [34][36]. The sequences were downloaded from GenBank by BLAST search and the accession numbers of these reference strains were shown in the phylogenetic trees directly.

Phylodynamic Analysis

The gene evolution rates and population size changes were determined using the Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method implemented in the BEAST v1.6.2 package (http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk) [37]. The best substitution model (TrN+G) for the Bayesian analysis was tested using the jModeltest program [28]. The Bayesian skyline plot (BSP) was used to estimate evolution rates and population dynamics under both molecular clock models (strict and relaxed) [38]. The best-fit model was determined using the Bayes factor test in the Tracer program. The MCMC chains were run a sufficient number of times to achieve convergence. In addition, the uncertainty of the parameters was estimated in the 95% highest probability density (HPD). The Maximum Clade Credibility (MCC) tree was constructed using Tree Annotator v 1.6.2.

Selection Pressure on the F Protein Gene

To determine the selection pressures on the F protein gene in all RSV isolates and subgenera, we estimated the ratio of non-synonymous (dN) and synonymous substitutions (dS) per site based on the maximum likelihood trees under the TrN substitution model, using the single likelihood ancestor counting (SLAC), fixed effects likelihood (FEL), and internal fixed effects likelihood (IFEL) method with a significance level of 0.05. The FEL method fits codon models to each site independently and performs a likelihood ratio test to evaluate whether a model that assumes equal non-synonymous and synonymous rates (dN = dS) can be rejected in favor of a model that allows for different dN and dS rates [39]. Ratios of greater than 1 were considered as evidence for positive selection. Analyses were performed on the Datamonkey website interface (http://www.datamonkey.org) [40].

Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

The nucleotide sequences of RSV isolates were submitted to GenBank and assigned accession numbers JX477455-JX477594. Prototype reference strains A2 (accession number FJ614814) and B1 (accession number AF013254) were included in nucleotide and amino acid sequence analyses studies.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the JMP software (Version 8). The statistical significance was set at the level of p<0.05.

Results

Study Population and Sequence Analysis

Of the 325 RSV isolates, there were 202 RSV-A, 99 RSV-B, and 24 dual infections according to the G protein gene sequences (Table 1). The age of the infected children was 17.9±16.3 (mean ± SD) months. The boy to girl ratio was 1.6∶1. No significant differences in clinical manifestations, such as length of fever and hospital stay, or oxygen use, were noted among the different subgroups. RSV-A predominated during the 2002–2005 and 2006–2008 seasons, whereas RSV-B strains prevailed during the 2005–2006 and 2009–2010 period.

Table 1. Clinical presentations of infected patients and yearly distributions.

RSV-A RSV-B Mixed
Clinical presentation (mean ± SD)
Age (months) 19.7±17.7 14.8±13.6 16.5±14.8
Male/female ratio 1.8 1.5 1.2
Fever duration (days) 3.3±3.0 3.1±3.0 3.1±1.8
Length of oxygen use (days) 5.3±7.9 5.8±4.5 5.5±4.7
Length of hospital stay (days) 7.7±7.3 7.5±4.7 8.4±4.2
C-reactive protein level (mg/dl) 1.9±3.0 1.5±2.6 1.8±3.1
Yearly distribution No. % No. % No. %
2000–2001 4 36.4 6 54.5 1 9.1
2001–2002 4 44.4 4 44.4 1 11.1
2002–2003 20 76.9 5 19.2 1 3.8
2003–2004 24 88.9 2 7.4 1 3.7
2004–2005 23 76.7 7 23.3 0 0.0
2005–2006 12 42.9 16 57.1 0 0.0
2006–2007 28 93.3 2 6.7 0 0.0
2007–2008 20 47.6 14 33.3 8 19.0
2008–2009 37 62.7 17 28.8 5 8.5
2009–2010 10 31.3 18 56.2 4 12.5
2010–2011 20 64.5 8 25.8 3 9.7
Total 202 60.5 99 32.4 24 7.1
§

No.-numbers of isolate.

Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence Analysis

The nucleotide P-distance is shown in Fig. 1A. The variability was 3.2–4.8% within RSV-A, 0.1–2.3% within RSV-B, and 15.8–18.4% between subgroups. The amino acid P-distance is shown in Fig. 1B. The variability was 0–3.3% within RSV-A, 0–2.9% within RSV-B, and 6.9–10.6% between subgroups. Our data suggest that the F protein was more variable for RSV-A than for RSV-B and sequence variation was higher at nucleotide level than at an amino acid level. The overall variability of amino acid of RSV-A and RSV-B compared to reference strains was 3.2–5.0% and 1.7–3.0%. The transition/transversion ratio was 4.88 for RSV-A and 7.12 for RSV-B.

Figure 1. Variability in the fusion protein region of RSV isolated from 2000–2011.

Figure 1

1A shows P-distance for nucleotides and 1B shows P-distance for amino acid.

Phylogenetic Analysis of the F Protein Gene

The 141 representative strains for phylogenetic analysis included 83 RSV-A and 58 RSV-B strains (Fig. 2A and 2B). Three clusters were identified among the RSV-A sequences, while no significant grouping was observed among RSV-B sequences. RSV-A cluster I was only noted in the isolates from Years 2002 to 2004. Most strains in cluster II were isolated during 2002 to 2004, with one exception in 2008. RSV-A strains in cluster III were found from 2003 to 2010.

Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of the RSV partial F gene (nt 110–869).

Figure 2

The tree topology was constructed using the neighbor-joining method. Only bootstrap values greater than 75% (1,000 bootstrap replicates) are shown. Panels A and B show details for RSV-A and RSV-B. Red and blue texts indicate the Taiwanese RSV-A and RSV-B strains, respectively. The scale bar represents the evolutionary distance.

Amino Acid Variation in Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte (CTL) Epitopes

We list the amino acid variation sites of CTL epitope of RSV- A in the Table 2 and RSV-B in Table 3. Three amino acids that differed between RSV-A and RSV-B (at positions 111, 113, and 114) were found in the HLA-B*57- and HLA-A*01 restricted CTL epitopes. The restricted epitopes were conserved in RSV-A. However, a mutation at position 117 (Y→H) in the HLA-A *01-restricted epitope was more frequent in RSV-B.

Table 2. Difference of amino acid in CTL-specific epitopes (HLA-B57, HLA-A*01) between RSV prototype (A2) and Taiwan RSV-A strains.

HLA-B*57 HLA-A*01
Amino acid position 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
Prototype A2 R A R R E L P R F R E L P R F M N Y T
RSV-A strains
A97-53-2008 . T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A95-287-2006 . . . . . . Q . . . . . Q . . . . . .
A97-72-2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R . . .
A91-342-2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H .
A97-20-2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K
A89-48-2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K
§

A: Alanine, E: Glutamic acid, F: Phenylalanine, H: Histidine, K: Lysine, L: Leucine, M: Methionine, N: Asparagine, P: Proline, Q: Glutamine, R: Arginine, T: Threonine, Y:Tyrosine.

*

Prototype A2: accession number FJ614814.

Table 3. Difference of amino acid in CTL-specific epitopes (HLA-B57, HLA-A*01) between RSV prototype (B1) and Taiwan RSV-B strains.

HLA-B*57 HLA-A*01
Amino acid position 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
Prototype B1 R A R R E A P Q Y R E A P Q Y M N Y T
RSV-B strains
B-96-28-2007 . . . . . . S . . . . . S . . . . . .
B-99-20-2010 . . . . . . . K . . . . . K . . . . .
B-99-05-2010 . . . . . . . . H . . . . . H . . H .
B-96-02-2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S . .
B-96-04-2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H .
B-94-969-2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H .
B-94-957-2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H .
B-94-1090-2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H .
B-93-176-2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
§

A: Alanine, E: Glutamic acid, F: Phenylalanine, H: Histidine, I: Isoleucine, K: Lysine, L: Leucine, M: Methionine, N: Asparagine, P: Proline, Q: Glutamine, R: Arginine,

S: Serine, T: Threonine, Y:Tyrosine.

*

Prototype B1: accession number AF013254.

Selection Pressure on the F Protein

The selection pressure on the RSV isolates examined in this study was estimated using the dN/dS ratio (Table 4). The mean dN/dS ratio was 0.102 in all RSV isolates, 0.093 in RSV-A and 0.137 in RSV-B. No positive selection sites were found for RSV-A, whereas 1 positive selection site was observed for RSV-B (position 125; L→P).

Table 4. Selection sites detected in RSV fusion protein genes.

Positively selected sites No. of negatively selected sites dN/dS
SLAC IFEL FEL SLAC IFEL FEL
RSV isolate None None 103 (0.03)* 33 37 70 0.102
RSV-A None None None 9 7 23 0.093
RSV-B None 125 (0.02)* None 1 3 9 0.137
§

p-value <0.05 are indicated by*. Selection site detection was performed on the Datamonkey website (http://www.datamonkey.org) with the single likelihood ancestor counting (SLAC), fixed effects likelihood (FEL), and internal fixed effects likelihood (IFEL) methods.

Evolutionary Rate and Phylodynamics of RSV

The evolutionary rate of the RSV F protein was 1.00×10−3 substitutions/site/year, and the 95% HPD was 0.823–1.183×10−3. The nucleotide substitution rates for the 3rd codon position (synonymous: 2.363, 95% HPD 2.233–2.489) were significantly higher than for codon positions 1 and 2 (nonsynonymous: 0.338, 95% HPD 0.250–0.437; 0.30, 95% HPD 0.208–0.399, respectively). Time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) for RSV-A and RSV-B in this study was estimated for the years 1968 (95% HPD, 1960–1976) and 1990 (95% HPD, 1994–1986). Bayesian skyline plot (BSP) models were used to estimate changes in epidemic history and evolutionary dynamics of RSV infection over time. Uncertainty in the estimated parameters was evaluated using 95% HPD intervals. The BSP describing the effective population size of RSV is shown in Figure 3. The genetic diversity of the viral population remained steady until 1995. Subsequently, the slight increase the population size during 1995 to 2000, followed by slowly declined until 2005, when it began a significant increase that lasted till 2010.

Figure 3. Bayesian skyline plot derived from alignment of the RSV partial F gene sequences in Taiwan.

Figure 3

The x axis is in units of years before 2010, and the y axis represents the effective population size of the virus (i.e. the number of genomes effectively contributing to the next generation). The thick solid black line is the estimated median, and the pale gray areas show the upper and lower bounds of the 95% HDP interval.

Discussion

To date, molecular evolution and phylogenetic analyses of RSV spanning successive seasons have not been reported for viruses circulating in Taiwan. In this study, we found that both RSV subgroups co-circulate in Taiwan and the genetic diversity of the F protein was more pronounced in subgroup A. A mutation at position 117 was more frequent in the HLA-A *01-restricted epitope in subgroup B. Positive selection was observed at site 125 in subgroup B. Phylodynamic patterns showed increased evolution of RSV in recent 5 years. Previous studies have suggested that illness severity is not linked to subgroups or genotypes but to the abundance of RSV in the nasopharyngeal aspirate [8], [41]. We also found no difference in the severity of disease caused by RSV-A and RSV-B.

Several community-based studies have revealed that viruses from both antigenic subgroups may co-circulate with one predominate during individual epidemic periods; and the dominant viruses can change genetically from one year to the next and replacement of genotypes in successive seasons [17], [18]. In accordance with these findings, we observe that RSV-A and RSV-B co-circulated and were dominant separately in Taiwan during certain years. Besides, our analysis of the genetic variability of the RSV F protein reveals evidence of shifts in the predominant three genetic clusters during 11 years and indicates genetic displacement of RSV-A. This process is characterized by the disappearance of several genotypes and the emergence of new genotypes within the same community, as observed over nine consecutive epidemics in Korea [26].

Antigenic variation in RSV may affect infectivity, as the RSV F and G proteins are targets for neutralizing antibodies [12], [42]. The RSV F-protein is highly conserved between subgroups with more than 90% amino acid sequence identity and it is not easy to undergo positive selection over the complete protein [11], [43]. To better understand the epidemiology and mechanisms of RSV reinfection, we therefore chose to study the F protein genes over an 11-years period in a localized geographical region. Despite the conserved nature of the F protein, the variation does occur between different strains and between the subtypes in our study as well as previous study [34]. We found that the transition/transversion ratio was 4.88 and 7.12 for subgroups A and B, which are similar to the values obtained in a previous report [16]. Furthermore, previous studies have suggested that mutations in the F protein gene are responsible for immunity to the anti-RSV drug Palivizumab in a small number of patients [44].

Virus-specific CTL play a major role in the clearance of RSV infection. We discovered 3 amino acid changes (at positions 111, 113, and 114) in the HLA B*57- and HLA-A*01-restricted epitopes of RSV-B but not in RSV-A. Our data are similar to those reported from a study in South Africa [16]. No positive selection site was found on CTL epitopes in Taiwan strains, suggesting that immune selection may not occur.

In our study, phylogenetic analysis showed that the genetic diversity of the F protein was more pronounced in RSV- A than in RSV-B, this is similar to other studies [16], [26]. Three RSV-A clusters in our study, containing most of the Taiwan strains, were identified. Each cluster comprised strains isolated during a different time period. These results imply that before 2004, RSV-A infections were involved in several small epidemics and only very limited numbers of strains evolved and re-emerged in subsequent years, as seen in cluster II. After 2005, the circulating RSV-A strains were quite different from those of the previous years; these strains continued evolving through 2010. In contrast to the phylogeny of RSV-A sequences, no significant clustering was found among the RSV-B phylogenies. This result is concordant with the estimation by TMRCA that RSV-B might have a shorter evolutionary history in Taiwan than RSV-A. The Taiwanese RSV-B strains spread over the phylogenetic tree, regardless of the isolation time. It suggests that the RSV-B strains were continually circulating in Taiwan.

In a previous study in New Zealand, the mutation rate calculated for the RSV-B G-gene was significantly higher than that of RSV-A, indicating that RSV subgroups exhibit different patterns of evolution, with subgroup B viruses evolving faster than those of subgroup A [45]. We found the evolutionary rate of the RSV F protein was 1.00×10−3 substitutions/site/year in our study, which was slower than that of the G protein gene (1.83×10−3) by Zlateva et al [46] and faster than whole genome (6.47×10−4) by Tan et al [47].

BSP is a very powerful tool to estimate changes in epidemic history and evolutionary dynamics of viral infection over time. The evolution rate of RSV in Taiwan had very little change before 2000, then slowed down between 2000 and 2005, and significantly evolved faster after 2005. The BSP pattern was in agreement with the phylogenetic analysis. Furthermore, comparison of the BSP and phylogenetic data suggests that the increase in the infected population was due to the co-circulation of RSV-A F protein cluster III and RSV-B type viruses.

In conclusion, RSV-A infections were involved in several small epidemics before 2004 and only very limited numbers of strains evolved and re-emerged in subsequent years in Taiwan. After 2005, the circulating RSV-A strains were different from those of the previous years and continued evolving through 2010. Phylodynamic pattern showed the evolutionary divergence in RSV increased significantly in recent 5 years. The evolutionary divergence in RSV is probably related to differences in immune protection in the hosts. Phylodynamic patterns showed an increase in the evolution of RSV in recent years, suggesting that monitoring of the gene will be necessary. Our results may provide important information for vaccine design and epidemiological studies.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by grants MMH 9783 from Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hall CB, McCarthy CA (2005) Respiratory Syncytial Virus. In: Mandell GL BJ, Dolin R, editor. Principles and practice of infectious disease. 6 ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc. 2008–2026.
  • 2. Nair H, Nokes DJ, Gessner BD, Dherani M, Madhi SA, et al. (2010) Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 375: 1545–1555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chi H, Chang IS, Tsai FY, Huang LM, Shao PL, et al. (2011) Epidemiological study of hospitalization associated with respiratory syncytial virus infection in Taiwanese children between 2004 and 2007. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 110: 388–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sung CC, Chi H, Chiu NC, Huang DT, Weng LC, et al. (2011) Viral etiology of acute lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalized young children in Northern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 44: 184–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lee JT, Chang LY, Wang LC, Kao CL, Shao PL, et al. (2007) Epidemiology of respiratory syncytial virus infection in northern Taiwan, 2001–2005– seasonality, clinical characteristics, and disease burden. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 40: 293–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Huang YC, Lin TY, Chang LY, Wong KS, Ning SC (2001) Epidemiology of respiratory syncytial virus infection among paediatric inpatients in northern Taiwan. Eur J Pediatr 160: 581–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Collins PL, Graham BS (2008) Viral and host factors in human respiratory syncytial virus pathogenesis. Journal of Virology 82: 2040–2055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sullender WM (2000) Respiratory syncytial virus genetic and antigenic diversity. Clin Microbiol Rev 13: 1–15, table of contents. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9. Cane PA (2001) Molecular epidemiology of respiratory syncytial virus. Rev Med Virol 11: 103–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Woelk CH, Holmes EC (2001) Variable immune-driven natural selection in the attachment (G) glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Journal of Molecular Evolution 52: 182–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Johnson PR, Collins PL (1988) The fusion glycoproteins of human respiratory syncytial virus of subgroups A and B: sequence conservation provides a structural basis for antigenic relatedness. J Gen Virol 69 (Pt 10): 2623–2628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lopez JA, Villanueva N, Melero JA, Portela A (1988) Nucleotide sequence of the fusion and phosphoprotein genes of human respiratory syncytial (RS) virus Long strain: evidence of subtype genetic heterogeneity. Virus Research 10: 249–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rock MT, Crowe JE Jr (2003) Identification of a novel human leucocyte antigen-A*01-restricted cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope in the respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein. Immunology 108: 474–480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Brandenburg AH, de Waal L, Timmerman HH, Hoogerhout P, de Swart RL, et al. (2000) HLA class I-restricted cytotoxic T-cell epitopes of the respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein. Journal of Virology 74: 10240–10244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Cherrie AH, Anderson K, Wertz GW, Openshaw PJ (1992) Human cytotoxic T cells stimulated by antigen on dendritic cells recognize the N, SH, F, M, 22K, and 1b proteins of respiratory syncytial virus. Journal of Virology 66: 2102–2110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Agenbach E, Tiemessen CT, Venter M (2005) Amino acid variation within the fusion protein of respiratory syncytial virus subtype A and B strains during annual epidemics in South Africa. Virus Genes 30: 267–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Peret TC, Hall CB, Hammond GW, Piedra PA, Storch GA, et al. (2000) Circulation patterns of group A and B human respiratory syncytial virus genotypes in 5 communities in North America. J Infect Dis 181: 1891–1896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zlateva KT, Vijgen L, Dekeersmaeker N, Naranjo C, Van Ranst M (2007) Subgroup prevalence and genotype circulation patterns of human respiratory syncytial virus in Belgium during ten successive epidemic seasons. J Clin Microbiol 45: 3022–3030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Grenfell BT, Pybus OG, Gog JR, Wood JL, Daly JM, et al. (2004) Unifying the epidemiological and evolutionary dynamics of pathogens. Science 303: 327–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Pybus OG, Rambaut A (2009) Evolutionary analysis of the dynamics of viral infectious disease. Nat Rev Genet 10: 540–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Goto-Sugai K, Tsukagoshi H, Mizuta K, Matsuda S, Noda M, et al. (2010) Genotyping and phylogenetic analysis of the major genes in respiratory syncytial virus isolated from infants with bronchiolitis. Jpn J Infect Dis 63: 393–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Botosso VF, Zanotto PM, Ueda M, Arruda E, Gilio AE, et al. (2009) Positive selection results in frequent reversible amino acid replacements in the G protein gene of human respiratory syncytial virus. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Simoes EA, Tan DH, Ohlsson A, Sales V, Wang EE (2001) Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine: a systematic overview with emphasis on respiratory syncytial virus subunit vaccines. Vaccine 20: 954–960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Crowe JE Jr (2001) Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development. Vaccine 20 Suppl 1S32–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Greenough A (2001) Recent advances in the management and prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Acta Paediatr Suppl 90: 11–14. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26. Kim YK, Choi EH, Lee HJ (2007) Genetic variability of the fusion protein and circulation patterns of genotypes of the respiratory syncytial virus. J Med Virol 79: 820–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253–1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Posada D (2009) Selection of models of DNA evolution with jModelTest. Methods in Molecular Biology 537: 93–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Schmidt HA, Strimmer K, Vingron M, von Haeseler A (2002) TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 18: 502–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Parker KC, Bednarek MA, Coligan JE (1994) Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. Journal of Immunology 152: 163–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Retief JD (2000) Phylogenetic analysis using PHYLIP. Methods in Molecular Biology 132: 243–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Efron B, Halloran E, Holmes S (1996) Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93: 13429–13434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Plows DJ, Pringle CR (1995) Variation in the fusion glycoprotein gene of human respiratory syncytial virus subgroup A. Virus Genes. 11: 37–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tolley KP, Marriott AC, Simpson A, Plows DJ, Matthews DA, et al. (1996) Identification of mutations contributing to the reduced virulence of a modified strain of respiratory syncytial virus. Vaccine 14: 1637–1646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Papenburg J, Carbonneau J, Hamelin ME, Isabel S, Bouhy X, et al. (2012) Molecular evolution of respiratory syncytial virus fusion gene, Canada, 2006–2010. Emerging Infectious Diseases 18: 120–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7: 214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, Shapiro B, Pybus OG (2005) Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1185–1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Kosakovsky Pond SL, Frost SD (2005) Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1208–1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Pond SL, Frost SD (2005) Datamonkey: rapid detection of selective pressure on individual sites of codon alignments. Bioinformatics 21: 2531–2533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Devincenzo JP (2004) Natural infection of infants with respiratory syncytial virus subgroups A and B: a study of frequency, disease severity, and viral load. Pediatr Res 56: 914–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Johnson PR Jr, Olmsted RA, Prince GA, Murphy BR, Alling DW, et al. (1987) Antigenic relatedness between glycoproteins of human respiratory syncytial virus subgroups A and B: evaluation of the contributions of F and G glycoproteins to immunity. Journal of Virology 61: 3163–3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Zheng H, Storch GA, Zang C, Peret TC, Park CS, et al. (1999) Genetic variability in envelope-associated protein genes of closely related group A strains of respiratory syncytial virus. Virus Res 59: 89–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. DeVincenzo JP, Hall CB, Kimberlin DW, Sanchez PJ, Rodriguez WJ, et al. (2004) Surveillance of clinical isolates of respiratory syncytial virus for palivizumab (Synagis)-resistant mutants. J Infect Dis 190: 975–978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Matheson JW, Rich FJ, Cohet C, Grimwood K, Huang QS, et al. (2006) Distinct patterns of evolution between respiratory syncytial virus subgroups A and B from New Zealand isolates collected over thirty-seven years. Journal of Medical Virology 78: 1354–1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Zlateva KT, Lemey P, Vandamme AM, Van Ranst M (2004) Molecular evolution and circulation patterns of human respiratory syncytial virus subgroup a: positively selected sites in the attachment g glycoprotein. J Virol 78: 4675–4683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Tan L, Lemey P, Houspie L, Viveen MC, Jansen NJ, et al. (2012) Genetic variability among complete human respiratory syncytial virus subgroup A genomes: bridging molecular evolutionary dynamics and epidemiology. PLoS One 7: e51439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES