Skip to main content
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery logoLink to Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
. 2013 Jun 21;17(4):638–643. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt254

Impact of occult renal impairment on early and late outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting

Akira Marui a,b,*, Hitoshi Okabayashi c, Tatsuhiko Komiya d, Shiro Tanaka b, Yutaka Furukawa e, Toru Kita e, Takeshi Kimura f, Ryuzo Sakata a; the CREDO-Kyoto Investigators
PMCID: PMC3781789  PMID: 23793709

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

High serum creatinine is considered an independent risk factor for poor outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the impact of occult renal impairment (ORI), defined as an impaired glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with a normal serum creatinine (SCr) level, remains unclear. Thus, we sought to investigate the impact of ORI on outcomes after CABG.

METHODS

Among patients undergoing their first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or CABG enrolled in the CREDO-Kyoto Registry (a registry of first-time PCI and CABG patients in Japan), 1842 patients with normal SCr levels undergoing CABG were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative estimated GFR calculated by the Cockcroft–Gault equation: 1339 patients with estimated GFR of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (normal group) and 503 with estimated GFR of <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (ORI group).

RESULTS

Preoperative estimated GFR differed between the groups (51.3 ± 6.6 vs 85.8 ± 23.0 ml/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.01). ORI was associated with high in-hospital mortality (3.2 vs 1.0%, P < 0.01) and need for dialysis (2.0 vs 0.2%, P < 0.01). In terms of long-term outcomes, ORI was associated with high mortality compared with the normal (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.72 [1.16–2.54], P < 0.01) and high incidence of composite cardiovascular events (death, stroke or myocardial infarction: 1.53 [1.16–2.02], P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

ORI was an independent risk factor for early and late death as well as cardiovascular events in patients undergoing CABG with normal SCr levels. A more accurate evaluation of renal function through a combination of SCr and estimated GFR is needed in patients with normal SCr levels.

Keywords: CABG, Renal insufficiency, Long-term outcomes, High-risk populations

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative renal dysfunction is considered an independent risk factor for mortality and morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [14]. SCr is the most popular test for renal failure. However, SCr does not usually rise until the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has fallen by 75% or more, and it can remain within the normal range even when renal function is significantly impaired [57]. SCr level depends on muscle mass, age, gender and metabolism, and it thus has a limited ability to identify patients with preoperative renal failure [7, 8].

Some populations with normal SCr but impaired renal function have been reported. Occult renal impairment (ORI) is defined as an impaired GFR with a normal SCr level [9]. Because GFR has been reported to estimate poor outcomes more accurately than SCr after cardiac surgery [10, 11], patients with ORI may be more strongly associated with poor outcomes compared with those with normal SCr levels and GFRs. However, the impact of ORI on outcomes after CABG, particularly on long-term outcomes, remains poorly understood. Thus, in the present study, we sought to investigate the impact of ORI on early and late outcomes after CABG using a large Japanese multicentre registry of myocardial revascularization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study population

The Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto (CREDO-Kyoto) is a multicentre registry in Japan that includes 9877 consecutive patients undergoing their first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or CABG and excludes those with acute myocardial infarction within a week before the index procedure [12]. This study was approved by the institutional review boards or ethics committees of all participating institutions (see Supplemental Table). Because the subjects were retrospectively enrolled, written informed consent was not obtained, in accordance with the guidelines for epidemiological studies issued by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan. Seventy-three patients were excluded because of their refusal to participate in the study when contacted for follow-up [12].

Between January 2000 and December 2002, 9877 patients were identified as having undergone either PCI (6878 patients) or CABG (2999 patients) without a prior history of coronary revascularization. Among the 2999 patients undergoing CABG, 484 undergoing concomitant valvular, left ventricular or major vascular operations were excluded from the current analysis. Among the 2515 patients undergoing isolated CABG, those with normal SCr levels (0.6–1.1 mg/dl for males; 0.4–0.8 mg/dl for females) were included. Therefore, the study group comprised 1842 patients with normal SCr who were undergoing their first isolated CABG.

Data collection and definitions

Demographic, angiographic and procedural data were collected from hospital charts or databases at the various centres by independent clinical research coordinators according to pre-specified definitions. Baseline clinical characteristics, such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, current smoker status, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive lung disease and malignancy, were regarded as present when these diagnoses were recorded in the hospital charts. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured either by contrast left ventriculography or echocardiography. Anaemia was defined as a blood haemoglobin level of <12 g/dl, as previously described [12].

Estimated GFR (eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2) was estimated by the Cockcroft–Gault formula [13, 14]. Renal impairment was regarded as present when GFR estimated by the Cockcroft–Gault formula was less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, as per the National Kidney Foundation's definition [15]. Thus, ORI was defined as an impaired eGFR (<60 ml/min/1.73 m2) with a normal SCr level.

End-points

An independent clinical events committee adjudicated events. Death was regarded as cardiovascular in origin unless obvious non-cardiovascular causes could be identified. Any death during the index hospitalization was regarded as cardiovascular death. Myocardial infarction was adjudicated according to the definition in the Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study [16]. Within 1 week of the index procedure, only Q-wave myocardial infarction was adjudicated as myocardial infarction. Stroke was defined as any new permanent global or focal neurological deficit that could not be attributed to other neurological or medical processes. In the majority of patients, strokes were diagnosed by neurologists and confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging head scans. Stroke at follow-up was defined as symptomatic stroke.

The primary end-point measure was death from any cause. Secondary end-points were stroke, myocardial infarction, the need for any revascularization procedures and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; which include death, stroke or myocardial infarction) during the follow-up period. As in-hospital end-points, the need for postoperative dialysis and the ratio of peak postoperative to preoperative Cr ≥2 were also evaluated.

Statistical analyses

All continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups were examined by an unpaired t-test and a Fisher's exact test. Categorical variables were presented as number and percentage and were compared with a χ2 test. Cumulative incidence was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences were assessed using a log-rank test. Outcomes after CABG in the presence or absence of ORI were compared by logistic regression or Cox proportional hazards models. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for the following clinically relevant confounders: age, gender, body mass index, emergency procedure, prior myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignancy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, anaemia, current smoker status, on- or off-pump surgery, triple-vessel disease, left main disease, total occlusion, proximal left anterior descending artery disease and use of left internal thoracic artery, right internal thoracic artery, gastroepiploic artery, radial artery or saphenous vein. They were consistent with previous reports from the current registry. Continuous variables were dichotomized using clinically meaningful reference values or median values.

All reported P-values were two-sided. All analyses were conducted by a statistician using SAS software version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and S-Plus version 7.0 (Insightful, Corp., Seattle, WA, USA). The authors had full access to the data and take responsibility for its integrity.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics and operative outcomes

Of the 1842 patients undergoing CABG with normal SCr levels, 503 (27.3%) had ORI. The baseline characteristics of the patients in the two groups are presented in Table 1. The ORI group included more elderly patients, but fewer male and lower body mass index patients. In addition, the ORI group generally included patients with heart failure, history of stroke and peripheral arterial disease. Preoperative coronary characteristics were similar between the groups, except for the ratio of triple-vessel disease. The ratio of off-pump surgery and the average number of anastomotic sites per patient were similar between the groups (Table 2). Arterial grafts in such vessels as the left internal thoracic artery, the gastroepiploic artery and the radial artery were used more commonly in the Normal group.

Table 1:

Baseline characteristics

Occult renal impairment (n = 503)
Normal (n = 1339)
P-value
Age (years) 73.6 ± 6.4 64.1 ± 9.1 <0.01
 ≥75 240 48% 149 11% <0.01
Male gender 327 65% 1057 79% <0.01
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m2) 51.3 ± 6.6 85.8 ± 23.0 <0.01
Body mass index 21.6 ± 2.8 24.5 ± 3.0 <0.01
Emergency procedure 38 8% 62 5% 0.01
Old myocardial infarction 210 42% 388 29% <0.01
Heart failure 124 25% 240 18% <0.01
Ejection fraction (%) 59.6 ± 14.8 61.6 ± 13.5 <0.01
Stroke history 119 24% 236 18% <0.01
Peripheral arterial disease 118 23% 213 16% <0.01
Atrial fibrillation 24 5% 62 5% 0.89
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 16 3% 21 2% 0.03
Hypertension 346 69% 967 72% 0.67
Diabetes mellitus 215 43% 581 43% 0.83
Hyperlipidaemia 235 47% 761 57% <0.01
Anaemia (haemoglobin <12 mg/dl) 203 40% 255 19% <0.01
Current smoker 88 17% 380 28% <0.01
Malignancy 42 8% 74 6% 0.03
Coronary characteristics
 Triple-vessel disease 358 71% 853 64% <0.01
 Left main disease 141 28% 401 30% 0.42
 Chronic total occlusion 212 42% 603 45% 0.27
 Proximal left anterior descending artery disease 300 60% 793 59% 0.87

Table 2:

CABG data

Occult renal impairment (n = 503) Normal (n = 1339) P-value
Off-pump 54.3% 56.3% 0.43
No. of anastomotic sites 3.3 ± 1.2 3.3 ± 1.1 0.57
Type of bypass grafts
 Left internal thoracic artery 90.7% 94.4% <0.01
 Right internal thoracic artery 29.0% 31.4% 0.33
 Right gastroepiploic artery 21.5% 29.1% <0.01
 Radial artery 28.0% 39.1% <0.01
 Saphenous vein 67.6% 53.6% <0.01

In-hospital outcomes

Observed in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the ORI group (3.2 vs 1.0%, P < 0.01; Table 3). In-hospital incidence of stroke in the ORI group tended to be higher than the Normal group (P = 0.06). The need for dialysis after CABG was more common in the ORI group (2.0 vs 0.2%, P < 0.01). In addition, patients with a ratio of post- to preoperative SCr level of ≥2 were more common in the ORI group (9.3 vs 6.1%, P = 0.02). A similar tendency was seen in the adjusted outcomes (Table 4). Adjusted in-hospital mortality was also significantly higher in the ORI group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.41 [1.04–5.57], P = 0.04). The need for dialysis after CABG was more common in the ORI group (5.93 [1.46–24.12], P = 0.01).

Table 3:

Observed in-hospital outcomes

Occult renal impairment (n = 503)
Normal (n = 1339)
P-value
Death 16 3.2% 13 1.0% <0.01
Stroke 12 2.4% 16 1.2% 0.06
Myocardial infarction 11 2.2% 16 1.2% 0.11
Need for dialysis 10 2.0% 3 0.2% <0.01
Post/pre Cre ≥2a 47 9.3% 82 6.1% 0.02

aRatio of peak postoperative to preoperative SCr level.

Table 4:

Adjusted in-hospital outcomes (occult renal impairment vs normal)

Hazard ratio 95% CI
P-value
Death 2.41 1.04 5.57 0.04
Stroke 1.76 0.81 3.85 0.15
Myocardial infarction 1.76 0.81 3.84 0.15
Need for dialysis 5.93 1.46 24.12 0.01
Post/pre Cre ≥2a 1.33 0.87 2.02 0.19

aRatio of peak postoperative to preoperative SCr level.

Long-term outcomes

Clinical follow-ups were completed for 98% of cases at 1 year and for 95% of cases at 2 years. The median follow-up period was 3.7 years. Figure 1 shows the Kaplan–Meier curves for survival and freedom from MACEs after CABG. Cumulative survival in the ORI and the Normal groups were 94.4 and 98.1% at 1 year and 83.2 and 93.1% at 5 years, respectively (P < 0.01). Similarly, freedom from MACEs was higher in the Normal group (P < 0.01).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Kaplan–Meier curves for all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events in the presence or absence of occult renal impairment. (A) All-cause death. (B) Major adverse cardiovascular event (death, stroke or myocardial infarction [MI])

Adjusted all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the ORI group (1.72 [1.16–2.54], P < 0.01, Table 5). Adjusted incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction and need for any revascularization did not differ between the groups. However, the incidence of MACEs was significantly higher in the ORI group (1.53 [1.16–2.02], P < 0.01).

Table 5:

Hazard ratios for late outcomes after CABG in patients with vs without occult renal impairment

Event (%)
Occult renal failure vs Normal
Occult renal impairment (n = 503)
Normal (n = 1339)
Hazard ratio 95% CI
P-value
Death 67 13.3% 71 5.3% 1.72 1.16 2.54 <0.01
Stroke 43 8.5% 73 5.5% 1.45 0.96 2.18 0.08
Myocardial infarction 19 3.8% 37 2.8% 1.38 0.79 2.40 0.26
Any revascularization 59 11.7% 171 12.8% 0.96 0.71 1.30 0.81
MACEa 108 21.5% 155 11.6% 1.53 1.16 2.02 <0.01

aComposite of death, stroke or myocardial infarction.

DISCUSSION

Principal findings

Preoperative renal impairment is considered an independent risk factor for mortality and morbidity after CABG [14]. SCr is the most popular test for renal impairment. However, some populations had impaired renal function despite normal SCr levels. In the present study, we sought to investigate the impact of ORI on early and late outcomes after CABG. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to investigate the late outcome of ORI patients. In addition, there has been no multicentre registry that has investigated the impact of ORI after CABG.

Observed in-hospital outcomes revealed that ORI was associated with high mortality compared with normal renal function. In addition, patients with ORI were associated with a higher need for postoperative dialysis and a higher peak postoperative SCr level. Adjusted in-hospital outcomes also revealed that patients with ORI were associated with higher mortality and the need for dialysis after CABG. In terms of late outcomes, patients with ORI were associated with poor survival compared with those with normal renal function. In addition, ORI was associated with a high incidence of major cardiovascular events. These outcomes indicate that routine estimation or measurement of GFR should be preferred over SCr as a screening method for the detection of higher-risk patients undergoing CABG. This study is important because we demonstrated that ORI is an independent risk factor of death after CABG not only for the in-hospital period but also for the long term.

The relationship between preoperative renal function and postoperative outcomes has been reported in a number of studies [14]. SCr level measurement is easy and is the most popular method used to evaluate preoperative renal function in screening tests. However, its use has been questioned in several studies, because it can be normal in spite of impaired renal function and it may underestimate mild renal dysfunction [58]. A more accurate approximation of renal function can be obtained using the Cockroft–Gault equation to calculate an eGFR from SCr. Several studies have reported the greater accuracy of eGFR compared with SCr in estimating the prognosis after cardiac surgery [10, 11, 1719].

Renal dysfunction is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with coronary artery disease [20]. In patients undergoing CABG, moderate and end-stage renal dysfunction are recognized risk factors for increased perioperative mortality and are accounted for in the commonly used cardiac risk stratification scoring systems [21, 22]. In addition, severe preoperative renal disease is associated with a higher incidence of morbidity, need for dialysis and longer hospital stay after CABG [23]. However, limited information exists regarding the influence of normal renal function on the immediate postoperative mortality and long-term survival of patients undergoing isolated first-time CABG.

Several reports have investigated the outcomes of normal renal function to mild renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Wijeysundera et al. [19] reported that among 10 751 patients with normal SCr levels undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass, 13% had ORI. Compared with patients with normal renal function, those with ORI experienced a more-than threefold an increased risk of in-hospital mortality and renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery. Wang et al. [10] reported that among 4603 patients with normal plasma Cr levels undergoing cardiac surgery, 12.3% had ORI and that ORI was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, renal failure requiring dialysis and major morbidity, such as cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, renal dysfunction and infection. In addition, estimated Cr clearance remained a significant predictor of these outcomes, but plasma Cr level was not a predictor of any outcomes.

Specifically for CABG, Noyez et al. [11] compared the risk stratification by level of SCr with estimated C clearance in 627 patients undergoing isolated CABG. They concluded that the association between preoperative renal failure and adverse outcomes after CABG is stronger with the estimated Cr clearance than with the routinely used SCr and that routine estimation or measurement of Cr clearance should be preferred over SCr as a screening method for the detection of higher-risk patients undergoing CABG. A large single-centre registry of 9159 patients with normal SCr undergoing CABG by Miceli et al. [17] reported that ORI was associated with a doubling in the risk of operative mortality, postoperative renal dysfunction and need for dialysis. In addition, ORI increased the risk of stroke, arrhythmia and prolonged hospital stay. However, all of these reports were limited to early outcomes.

There are several important limitations to this study. First and most importantly, observational studies have problems related to biases and unmeasured confounders. Multivariate analyses may not adequately adjust for these biases. Second, we used the Cockcroft–Gault equation to estimate GFR because it has been most generally used in clinical settings. However, we should have used another method to calculate GFR. GFR can be calculated based on SCr (the Cockcroft–Gault, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] study or Chronic kidney disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI] equations) or on Cystatin C [24, 25]. Using SCr has significant disadvantages, such as the inability to measure renal function correctly when impairment is 50% or less. Creatinine generation is proportional to muscle mass and related to an individual's age, sex, race and weight. On the other hand, Cystatin C is a cysteine protease inhibitor with a molecular mass of 13 kDa. It has been shown that cystatin C is a more sensitive marker of GFR changes than SCr because its levels are not affected by muscle mass, age, inflammation, fever or exogenous agents. Finally, we have adjusted the differences of patients' backgrounds (e.g. age, sex, myocardial infarction, heart failure) using propensity score analysis. However, the analysis may not adequately adjust for these biases. In addition, our study was nonrandomized; potential confounders may influence our outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

ORI is an independent risk factor of early and late death as well as MACEs in patients undergoing CABG with normal SCr levels. A more accurate evaluation of renal function through a combination of SCr and eGFR may facilitate a better risk stratification that can optimize therapeutic strategies.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material is available at ICVTS online.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a Grant for Clinical Research for Evidence Based Medicine from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan to T. Kimura and an educational grant from the Research Institute for Production Development (Kyoto, Japan).

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cooper WA, O'Brien SM, Thourani VH, Guyton RA, Bridges CR, Szczech LA, et al. Impact of renal dysfunction on outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the society of thoracic surgeons national adult cardiac database. Circulation. 2006;113:1063–70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.580084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chikwe J, Castillo JG, Rahmanian PB, Akujuo A, Adams DH, Filsoufi F. The impact of moderate-to-end-stage renal failure on outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:574–9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Charytan DM, Yang SS, McGurk S, Rawn J. Long and short-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with and without chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:3654–63. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zakeri R, Freemantle N, Barnett V, Lipkin GW, Bonser RS, Graham TR, et al. Relation between mild renal dysfunction and outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2005;112:I270–5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.522623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kellen M, Aronson S, Roizen MF, Barnard J, Thisted RA. Predictive and diagnostic-tests of renal failure: a review. Anesth Analg. 1994;78:134–42. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199401000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stevens LA, Coresh J, Greene T, Levey AS. Assessing kidney function—measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. New Engl J Med. 2006;354:2473–83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra054415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Duncan L, Heathcote J, Djurdjev O, Levin A. Screening for renal disease using serum creatinine: who are we missing? Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2001;16:1042–6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/16.5.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Swedko P, Clark HD, Paramsothy K, Akbari A. Serum creatinine is an inadequate screening test for renal failure in elderly patients. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:356–60. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.3.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rashid ST, Salman M, Agarwal S, Hamilton G. Occult renal impairment is common in patients with peripheral vascular disease and normal serum creatinine. Eur J Vasc Endovasc. 2006;32:294–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang F, Dupuis JY, Nathan H, Williams K. An analysis of the association between preoperative renal dysfunction and outcome in cardiac surgery—estimated creatinine clearance or plasma creatinine level as measures of renal function. Chest. 2003;124:1852–62. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.5.1852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Noyez L, Plesiewicz I, Verheugt FWA. Estimated creatinine clearance instead of plasma creatinine level as prognostic test for postoperative renal function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:461–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kimura T, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Shizuta S, Ehara N, et al. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease in the bare-metal stent era. Circulation. 2008;118:S199–209. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41. doi: 10.1159/000180580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gault MH, Longerich LL, Harnett JD, Wesolowski C. Predicting glomerular function from adjusted serum creatinine. Nephron. 1992;62:249–56. doi: 10.1159/000187054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Patel SS, Kimmel PL, Singh A. New clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: a framework for K/DOQI. Semin Nephrol. 2002;22:449–58. doi: 10.1053/snep.2002.35973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Serruys PW, Ong ATL, van Herwerden LA, Sousa JE, Jatene A, Bonnier JJRM, et al. Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease—the final analysis of the arterial revascularization therapies study (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:575–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miceli A, Bruno VD, Capoun R, Romeo F, Angelini GD, Caputo M. Occult renal dysfunction: a mortality and morbidity risk factor in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:771–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Najafi M, Goodarzynejad H, Karimi A, Ghiasi A, Soltaninia H, Marzban M, et al. Is preoperative serum creatinine a reliable indicator of outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:304–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wijeysundera DN, Karkouti K, Beattie WS, Rao V, Ivanov J. Improving the identification of patients at risk of postoperative renal failure after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:65–72. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200601000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Best P. Cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease: insights and an update. Am Heart J. 2004;148:230–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SA. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:881–2. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00799-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1–coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:S2–2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Parikh DS, Swaminathan M, Archer LE, Inrig JK, Szczech LA, Shaw AD, et al. Perioperative outcomes among patients with end-stage renal disease following coronary artery bypass surgery in the USA. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:2275–83. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Earley A, Miskulin D, Lamb EJ, Levey AS, Uhlig K. Estimating equations for glomerular filtration rate in the era of creatinine standardization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:785–95. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-11-201203200-00391. W-270, W-271, W-272, W-273, W-274, W-275, W-276, W-277, W-278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Feng JF, Qiu L, Zhang L, Li XM, Yang YW, Zeng P, et al. Multicenter study of creatinine- and/or cystatin c-based equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rates in chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES