Skip to main content
Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics : BJMG logoLink to Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics : BJMG
. 2013 Nov 3;16(2):23–28. doi: 10.2478/bjmg-2013-0027

The Incidence and Type of Chromosomal Translocations from Prenatal Diagnosis of 3800 Patients in the Republic of Macedonia

M Vasilevska 1,*, E Ivanovska 1, K Kubelka Sabit 1, E Sukarova-Angelovska 2, G Dimeska 3
PMCID: PMC4001411  PMID: 24778559

Abstract

Robertsonian and reciprocal chromosomal translocations are the most frequent type of structural chromosomal aberrations in the human population. We report the frequency and type of detected translocations in 10 years of prenatal diagnosis of 3800 prenatal samples. The materials came from amniocentesis and chorionic villus samples (CVS). We detected seven Robertsonian translocations (0.18%), eight autosomal reciprocal translocations (0.21%) and one sex chromosome translocation (0.03%). The overall frequency of all translocations was 0.42%. Balanced state translocations were 0.29% and the frequency of translocations in an unbalanced state was 0.13%. There was one balanced de novo X-autosome translocation [46,X,t(X;10)(p11.23;q22.3)] and one balanced double translocation [46,XX,t(1;21);t(7;16)(1p21; 21q11) (7q31;16q23)] inherited from the mother. Most of the detected translocations were the result of unknown familial translocations, but some of them had been previously detected in one of the parents. In order to detect the recurrence risk for future pregnancies, we proposed genetic counseling in each of the cases and we established whether the parents were heterozygous for the same translocation. Histopatological findings for some unbalanced translocations correlated with phenotypes of detected unbalanced karyotypes.

Keywords: Human chromosomal translocations, Karyotype, Prenatal diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

Constitutive chromosome translocations are the most frequent structural chromosomal abnormalities in humans. There are Robertsonian translocations involving acrocentric chromosomes, reciprocal translocations between autosome chromosomes or sex chromosome translocations. All types of translocations may be presented in balanced and unbalanced states. Mental and physical abnormalities can be expected when the translocation is in an unbalanced state. On the other hand, the phenotype of the balanced translocation carriers is usually normal and the translocation may pass undetected through generations. The birth of a child with an unbalanced form of translocation or infertility in the carriers, usually reveals the existence of a familial chromosomal translocation [1]. Gametogenesis of the carries is affected by forming trivalents (Robertsonian translocations) or quadrivalents (reciprocal translocations) between translocated and normal chromosomes. The type of gametes produced in meiosis depends on the mode of chromosome segregation. Only alternate segregation can produce normal or gametes with translocations in a balanced state. All other modes can be classified as malsegregation, because of production of unbalanced gametes [2]. Genetic counseling, risk estimation and prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis are required for the carriers of known balanced chromosomal translocations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the period from 2002 to 2012, 3800 prenatal samples [2556 amniotic fluids and 1244 chorionic villus samples (CVS)] were referred to the Department of Diagnostic Laboratories (Cytogenetic Laboratory), Clinical Hospital Acibadem Sistina, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia (ROM). Referral reasons for prenatal diagnosis were advanced maternal age, abnormal ultrasound findings, history of chromosomal abnormalities, positive maternal serum triple test (Table 1).

Table 1.

Referral reasons for 3800 prenatal diagnosis (amniotic fluids and chorionic villus samples).

Referral Reasons Amniotic Fluid % CVS %
Maternal age 2276 59.89 1130 29.74
Abnormal ultrasound findings 143 3.76 72 1.89
Positive triple test 111 2.92 27 0.71
History of chromosomal abnormalities 26 0.69 15 0.40

Amniotic fluid samples and CVS were cultivated in Amniogrow complete medium (Cytogen, Sinn, Germany). Peripheral blood samples of the parents (prenatal detection of structural chromosomal abnormality) were cultivated in Lymphogrow medium (Cytogen). At least 15 metaphases were analyzed for each case and 10 metaphases were karyotyped using Bandview software from Applied Spectral Imaging (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The results were reported according to the recommendations of the International System for Chromosome Nomenclature 2009 [3].

RESULTS

During 10 years prenatal diagnosis and 3800 samples provided by amniocentesis and chorion biopsy, we detected seven Robertsonian translocations, eight autosomal reciprocal translocations and one sex chromosome translocation in balanced and unbalanced states (Table 2). Referral reasons for prenatal diagnosis for all cases are represented in Table 1.

Table 2.

Detected translocations from prenatal diagnosis of 3800 cases.

Chromosomal Translocation Breakpoints Familial/De Novo Balanced/Unbalanced Referral Reason
1 45,XY,rob(13;14) (q10;q10) paternal balanced intracytoplasmic sperm injection; oligoastenoteratozoospermia
2 45,XY,rob(13;14) (q10;q10) maternal balanced maternal age
3 45,XX,rob(13;14) (q10;q10) maternal balanced positive maternal triple test
4 45,XX,rob(13;14) (q10;q10) maternal balanced known translocation
5 46,XY,rob(14;21)+21 (q10;q10) maternal unbalanced child with Down’s syndrome
6 46,XY,rob(14;21)+21 (q10;q10) maternal unbalanced ultrasound abnormalities
7 46,XY,+13,der(13;13) (q10;q10) de novo unbalanced ultrasound abnormalities
8 46,XY,t(6;10) (p21;q26) paternal balanced two previous miscarriages
9 46,XY,t(9;16) (q12;q11) paternal balanced ultrasound detected choroid plexus cysts
10 46,XX,t(2;17) (q14.3;q23) paternal balanced maternal age
11 46,XY,t(7;12) (q32;q24.1) paternal balanced previous child with multiple malformations
12 46,XY,t(12;19) (12qter::19q13→19qter) paternal balanced maternal age
13 46,XX,t(1;21)t(7;16) (1p21;21q11)(7q31;16q23) maternal balanced one previous miscarriage; infertility
14 45,X,t(2;21) (p10;p10) ? Turner syndrome ultrasound hydrops fetalis
15 45,XY,t(18;21) (p11;q11),18p- de novo 18p- IVF ultrasound abnormalities
16 46,XX,t(X;10) (p11.23;q22.3) de novo balanced IVS thawed embryo, maternal age

An overall frequency of all Robertsonian translocations was 0.18%; all four (13;14) were in balanced state, three of which originated from maternal Robertonian translocations and only one case of paternal origin. Maternal carriers of this Robertsonian translocation did not have reproductive problems or pregnancies with unbalanced rob(13;14) translocations. The translocation with paternal origin resulted from oligoastenoteratozoospermia in the paternal carrier of rob(13;14) and conception was achieved after applying techniques of assisted reproduction. There were two rob(14;21) translocations detected in an unbalanced state, both of them of maternal origin. In one of the patients with familial rob(14;21) the microscopic analysis of the curetted placental tissue showed abnormalities that suggested chromosomal abnormalities consistent with trisomy. The chorionic villi had irregular villus contours (shapes) with mucinous or edematous stroma (Figure 1). The villous blood vessels were diminished and nucleated erythrocytes were absent. The trophoblast on the villous surface showed trophoblastic proliferations in the form of sprouts (Figure 2).There is one case with de novo 46,XY, +13,der(13;13) with detected ultrasound abnormalities. The autopsy of the fetus showed multiple anomalies. The fetus had cheilognathopalatoshisis, hexadactily on both toes. The visceral organs did not show any abnormalities. These findings were consistent with a Patau’s syndrome phenotype.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The chorionic villi in T14;21 had irregular villus contours (shapes) with mucinous or edematous stroma.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The trophoblast on the villus surface showed trophoblastic proliferations in the form of sprouts.

The frequency of autosomal reciprocal translocations was 0.21% (eight cases). Five conceptions with reciprocal translocations of autosome chromosomes in a balanced state (paternal origin) were achieved normally. There was one double translocation 46,XX t(1;21)t(7;16) with normal ultrasound parameters from maternal origin, mother was the de novo carrier for both translocations, without phenotypic abnormalities (Figure 3). There was only one de novo 45,XY,t(18;21)(p11;q11),18p- case associated with ultrasound abnormalities detected after a pregnancy was achieved with the assistance of IVF. One case, 45,X, t(2;21)(p10;p10) of unknown origin, was represented with ultrasound hydrops fetalis that was associated with Turner Syndrome phenotype.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

46,XX t(1;21)(1p21;21q11);t(7;16)(7q31;16q23)mat.

There was one de novo case of apparently balanced sex chromosome translocation [46,X,t(X;10) (p11.23; q22.3)] in a single pregnancy achieved after transfer of three thawed embryos (Figure 4). The karyotypes of the parents were normal.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

De novo balanced translocation 46,X,t(X;10)(p11.23;q22.3?) in a thawed IVF embryo.

DISCUSSION

Chromosomal translocations are represented in our study with an overall frequency of 0.42%. The frequency of translocations in a balanced state were 0.29% and of translocations in an unbalanced state was 0.13%.

There were seven Robertsonian translocations detected in our study, six of them being inherited from a parent who was a carrier of a Robertsonian translocation. All four detected rob(13;14) were in a balanced state. Three of them were of maternal origin, and in all cases there was no evidence of reproductive problems. One case of rob(13;14) was of paternal origin, and the analyzed pregnancy was achieved by assisted reproduction because of the father’s severe oligoastenozoospermia. The two cases of rob(14;21) detected in our study were in an unbalanced state and of maternal origin.

Our results correlate with the European collaborative study [4], where all karyotypes of 280 prenatal samples [parent rob(13;14) carrier] were in a balanced state. It was noted by several investigators that meiotic segregation products in male carriers of all Robertsonian translocations result mostly from alternate segregation mode (>75.0%) [57]. Analysis of meiotic prophase cells in heterozygous carriers of different Robertsonian translocations showed that the predominance of a preferential cis-configuration of the meiotic trivalent structure could promote alternate segregation [8,9].

The risk for translocation trisomy 21 (Down’s syndrome) at amniocentesis in female heterozygote was estimated to be about 15.0% [4,10]. The risk of having a live-born child with translocation trisomy 21 was around 10.0%. There was an about 1.0% risk for paternal transmission of translocation trisomy 21 [2].

In our study, there was one case of de novo unbalanced homologous translocation with karyotype 46,XY, rob(13;13)(q10;q10)+13. The histopathological findings of this terminated pregnancy confirmed a Patau’s syndrome phenotype. According to the consulted references, 90.0% of cases with t(13;13) are de novo and estimated mutation rate for de novo t(13;13) is 0.5% per 105 gametes at conception [11]. Bugge et al. [12] used 20 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA polymorphisms to determine whether trisomy 13 due to de novo rea(13q;13q) in six cases is caused by translocation (13q;13q) or isochromosome (13q;13q), and the determine the parental origin of the rearrangements and the mechanisms of formation. In five cases, isochromosomes with two identical q arms were revealed, one of maternal origin and four of paternal origin. Only one case had a Robertsonian translocation of maternal origin [12].

Reciprocal translocations of different autosome chromosomes were presented in our study with six cases in a balanced state, five of them of paternal origin and one double translocation inherited from the mother. Only the cases of 46,XY,t(6;10)(p21;q26) pat. and double translocation 46,XX,t(1;21)t(7;16) mat. were associated with reproductive problems. All other cases were of paternal origin and did not report reproductive abnormalities; they have other children with normal phenotypes.

It was noted that if the same (balanced) karyotype found in the carrier parent was detected at prenatal diagnosis, there was no increased risk of phenotypic abnormality in the child [2]. However, there are mechanisms where apparently balanced translocation may have phenotypic consequences in the progeny of translocation carriers. These are: cryptic unbalanced defect [13], post zygotic loss of a derivative chromosome in one cell line [14], position effect [15], and uniparental disomy. Gametogenesis of reciprocal translocation carriers is affected by different segregation modes at meiosis and unbalanced gametes lead to infertility, recurrent miscarriages and fetal multiple malformations. Genetic counselling for prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis in all future pregnancies of a parent heterozygous for reciprocal translocation is required. Genetic counselling for a double translocation is the same as for a single translocation, although the risk for future pregnancies is increased [16].

We found two unbalanced karyotypes with reciprocal translocations. One unbalanced state was the result of monosomy X (Turner syndrome) associated with translocation (2;21) of unknown origin. If there is a parent carrier of the same translocation, this karyotype may be the result of ICE (interchromosomal effect) [17].

The other one is a de novo 45,XY,t(18;21) (p11;p11) 18p- (IVF pregnancy) in parents with normal karyotypes. Random error in parental gametogenesis seems to be the reason for this translocation and the recurrence risk is low.

Regarding the normal phenotype of the girl with the de novo apparently balanced sex chromosome translocation 46,X,t(X;10)(p11.23;q22.3), we can assume that there was early replication of the translocated X chromosome in all cells. However, reproductive failure and recurrent miscarriages can be expected later in life and genetic counselling as well as prenatal diagnosis is required.

Sex chromosome translocations (X-autosome) are distinct from autosome translocations because of transcriptional silencing of an extra X chromosome in the female [18]. Inactivation pattern is crucial for phenotypes of affected female carriers. Silencing of a normal X chromosome is required for a normal phenotype. Even so, there is a risk of gene disruption or position effect in X-autosome female carriers. In the review of 122 cases of balanced X-autosome translocations in females [19], with respect to the X inactivation pattern, the position of the X breakpoint and the resulting phenotype, there were 77.0% of the patients where translocated X chromosome was replicated early in all cells analyzed. The breakpoints in these cases were distributed all along the X chromosome. Most of these patients were either phenotypically normal or had gonadal dysgenesis, some had single gene disorders, and less than 9.0% had multiple congenital anomalies and/or mental retardation. In the remaining 23.0% of the cases, the translocated X chromosome was late replicating in a proportion of the cells. In these cells, only one of the translocation products was reported to replicate late, while the remaining portion of the X chromosome showed the same replication pattern as the homologous part of the active, structurally normal X chromosome. The analysis of DNA methylation in one of these cases confirmed non inactivation of the translocated segment. Consequently, these cells were functionally disomic for a part of the X chromosome.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the prenatal chromosomal translocations were the result of familial translocations. We detected three de novo translocations, one balanced X-autosome translocation, one unbalanced t(18;21)(p11;q11),18pand one unbalanced der(13;13). The frequency of all translocations was 0.42%. In each case, genetic counseling was required to establish whether the parents were heterozygous for the same translocation and to establish the recurrence risk for future pregnancies.

Footnotes

Declaration of Interest. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Warburton D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet. 1991;49(5):995–1013. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shaffer LG, Slovak ML, Campbell LJ, editors. ISCN (2009): an international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Basel: S. Karger; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boue A, Gallano P. A collaborative study of the segregation of inherited chromosome structural rearrangements in 1356 prenatal diagnoses. Prenat Diagn. 1984;4(special issue):45–67. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970040705. (Author: is this correct?) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Honda H, Miharu N, Samura O, He H, Ohama K. Meiotic segregation analysis of a 14;21 Robertsonian translocation carrier by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Genet. 2000;106(2):188–193. doi: 10.1007/s004390051027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Morel F, Roux C, Bresson JL. FISH analysis of the chromosomal status of spermatozoa from three men with 45,XY,der(13;14)(q10;q10) karyotype. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;7(5):483–488. doi: 10.1093/molehr/7.5.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anton E, Blanco J, Egozcue J, Vidal F. Sperm FISH studies in seven male carriers of Robertsonian translocation t(13;14)(q10;q10) Hum Reprod. 2004;19(6):1345–1351. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vidal F, Templado C, Navarro J, Marina S, Egozcue J. Meiotic and synaptonemal complex studies in a 14/21 translocation carrier. Int J Androl. 1982;5(1):21–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1982.tb00229.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Templado C, Vidal F, Navarro J, Marina S, Egozcue J. Meiotic studies and synaptonemal complex analysis in two infertile males with a 13/14 balanced translocation. Hum Genet. 1984;67(2):162–165. doi: 10.1007/BF00272992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ferguson-Smith MA. Prenatal chromosome analysis and its impact on the birth incidence of chromosome disorders. Br Med Bull. 1983;39(4):355–364. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hook EB. Rates of chromosomal abnormalities at different maternal ages. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;58(3):282–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bugge M, deLozier-Blanchet C, Bak M, Brandt CA, Hertz JM, Nielsen JB, et al. Trisomy 13 due to rea(13q;13q) is caused by i(13) and not rob(13;13)(q10; q10) in the majority of cases. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;132(3):310–313. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wagstaff J, Hemann M. A familial “balanced” 3;9 translocation with cryptic 8q insertion leading to deletion and duplication of 9p23 loci in siblings. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;56(1):302–309. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dufke A, Mayrhofer H, Enders H, Kaiser P, Leipoldt M. Unusual chromosomal mosaicism as a cause of mental retardation and congenital malformations in a familial reciprocal translocation carrier, t(17;22)(q24.2; q11.23) Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001;93(3–4):168–170. doi: 10.1159/000056979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Crolla JA, van Heyningen V. Frequent chromosome aberrations revealed by molecular cytogenetic studies in patients with aniridia. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(5):1138–1149. doi: 10.1086/344396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bowser-Riley SM, Griffiths MJ, Creasy MR, Farndon PA, Martin KE, Thomson DAG, et al. Are double translocations double trouble? J Med Genet. 1988;25(5):326–331. doi: 10.1136/jmg.25.5.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Douet-Guilbert N, Bris MJ, Amice V, Marchetti C, Delobel B, Amice J, et al. Interchromosomal effect in sperm of males with translocations: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. Int J Androl. 2005;28(6):372–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00571.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vasilevska M, Anevska Mitrevska A, Stefanovska AM, Sekovska E, Adamoska S, Dimeska G. De novo apparently balanced reciprocal (X;10) translocation from prenatal diagnosis of IVF achieved pregnancy. Chromosome Res. 2009;17(Suppl):13–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schmidt M, Du Sart D. Functional disomies of the X chromosome influence the cell selection and hence the X inactivation pattern in females with balanced X-autosome translocations: a review of 122 cases. Am J Med Genet. 1992;42(2):161–169. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320420205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics : BJMG are provided here courtesy of De Gruyter

RESOURCES