Abstract
Cullin family proteins function as scaffolds to form numerous E3 ubiquitin ligases with RING proteins, adaptor proteins and substrate recognition receptors. These E3 ligases further recognize numerous substrates to participate in a variety of cellular processes, such as DNA damage and repair, cell death and cell cycle progression. Clinically, cullin-associated E3 ligases have been identified to involve numerous human diseases, especially with regard to multiple cancer types. Over the past few years, our understanding of cullin proteins and their functions in genome stability and tumorigenesis has expanded enormously. Herein, this review briefly provides current perspectives on cullin protein functions, and mainly summarizes and discusses molecular mechanisms of cullin proteins in tumorigenesis.
Keywords: Cullins, E3 ligase, Tumorigenesis, DNA damage, apoptosis, cell cycle
1. Introduction: overview of cullins and their functions
Cullins are evolutionarily conserved family proteins throughout bacteria, plants and mammals 1. The human genome encodes six cullin proteins characterized by a cullin homology (CH) domain in the carboxyl (C)-terminal, including CUL1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B and 5 (Figure 1) 2. Moreover, the human genome also encodes another two atypical cullin proteins (CUL7 and CUL9) that consist of additional homology domains 3, such as DOC1 (destruction of cyclin B) homology domain and IBR (in-between-ring) domain 3. These cullin proteins potentially assemble RING-box protein 1 (RBX1, also known as ROC1) and/or RBX2 (also known as ROC2 or SAG-sensitive to apoptosis gene), forming Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) 4.
Figure 1.
The domain structures of human cullin proteins. Numbers represent the amino acid codons. The blue lines indicate the position of the neddylation site 5.
Generally, CRLs consist of four components: cullins, RINGs, adaptor proteins and substrate recognition receptors 5. The two RING-box components (RBX1 and RBX2) can bind to two zinc atoms via a C3H2C3 motif to form the RING finger domain, which is required for the activity of CRLs 6. Except for CUL9, all of the other cullin proteins in human can interact with RBX1 or RBX2 through an evolutionarily conserved CH domain at the C-terminus 5. Moreover, the human genome contains four adaptor proteins, including S-phase kinase-associated protein 1 (Skp1), Elongin B and C, and damaged DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1) 7. Of them, Skp1 generally interacts with CUL1 and CUL7; Elongin B and C interact with CUL2 and CUL5; and DDB1 interacts with CUL4A and CUL4B (Figure 2) 7. In addition, BTB (Broad complex, Tramtrack, Bric-a-brac) proteins have been reported to function as adaptors interacting with CUL3 8. However, it has not been found adaptor protein that interacts with CUL9 to date (Figure 2). These CRLs have been identified to harbor more than 400 substrate recognition receptors in human genome, including 78 F-box proteins for CRL1, 80 SOCS (suppressor of cytokine signaling) proteins for CRL2/5, ~200 BTB proteins for CRL3, and 90 DCAF (DDB1 and CUL4-associated factors) proteins for CRL4A/B 5, 9. These substrate recognition receptors further ubiquitinate and degrade thousands of substrates 5, controlling multiple cellular processes, such as cell cycle regulation, gene transcription, apoptosis, DNA damage and repair, chromatin remodeling, oxidative stress response, and signal transduction 5.
Figure 2.
Models of cullin-RING E3 ligases. Cullin proteins recruit adaptor proteins (Skp1 for CUL1 and CUL7, Elongin B/C for CUL2 and CUL5, BTB protein for CUL3, and DDB1 for CUL4A and 4B), receptor proteins (F-box proteins for CUL1, VHL-box for CUL2, DCAFs for CUL4A and 4B, SOCS for CUL5, and FBXW8 for CUL7), and RING protein (RBX1/2) to form CRL E3 ligases that promote ubiquitin to transfer from RBX1/RBX2-bound E2 to a substrates 5. (A) CRL1; (B) CRL2; (C) CRL3; (D) CRL4; (E) CRL5; (F) CRL7; (G) CRL9.
Interestingly, all of these CRLs share a similar core architecture, in which a cullin protein serves as a scaffold that binds to an adaptor protein or a substrate receptor protein at the N-terminus, and interacts with a RING protein at the C-terminus (Figure 2) 5. The substrate specificity of CRLs is determined by substrate recognition receptors such as F-box proteins and DCAF proteins, whereas the activity of core ligases is controlled by CUL-RBX1 (or RBX2) complex (Figure 2) 2. Clinically, deregulation of CRLs is linked to uncontrolled proliferative diseases such as cancer 5. However, only a few components in these hundreds of CRLs are well studied for their involvement in cancer 5. Generally, cancer-associated CRL components can be categorized into two classes: oncogenes and tumor suppressors 5. The oncogenes such as Skp2 (S-phase kinase-associated protein 2) and CUL4A are frequently overexpressed in cancers 10. Tumor suppressors such as FBXW7 (F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 7) and VHL (Von Hippel-Lindau) are always mutated and inactivated in human cancers 11.
CRLs are the largest family of E3 ubiquitin ligases and they are responsible for the ubiquitination of about 20% of intracellular proteins through ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) 5. Cancer cells utilize the UPS for their increased growth and decreased apoptotic cell death 12. The UPS consists of six components: ubiquitin (Ub), the Ub-activating enzyme (E1), a variety of Ub-conjugating enzymes (E2s), numerous Ub ligases (E3s), the proteasome and the deubiquitinases (DUBs) 12. Protein degradation by the UPS mainly includes two distinct steps: (1) ubiquitination, which adds a mono- or poly-Ub-tag to the targeted proteins, and (2) proteasomal degradation, which degrades the Ub-tagged proteins into oligopeptides 12. Two major ubiquitin-ligase complexes, including Skp1-CUL1-F-box (SCF) complex and Anaphase Promoter Complex or Cyclosome (APC/C), are responsible for ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis in mammals 13. Previous studies have revealed that UPS contributes to oncogenesis through a variety of mechanisms, such as controlling cell proliferation and survival, regulating the turnover of key proteins (cyclins, p27 and p53) involved in cell cycle progression, and regulating the NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) pathway 12. Moreover, cancer cells can utilize the UPS to achieve aberrant growth and resistance to apoptosis 12.
The cullin family proteins are also known as substrates of NEDD8 (neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 8), an ubiquitin-like protein 14, 15. The NEDD8-associated ubiquitination includes several critical steps: (1) NEDD8 is activated by NEDD8-activating enzyme E1 (also known as NAE1); (2) the activated NEDD8 is further transferred to ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 (UBC12 or UBE2F) 15; and (3) NEDD8-conjugating enzyme E2 collaborates with NEDD8-E3 ligase, conjugating NEDD8 to its target substrates 15. The NEDD8 pathway is critical in mediating the ubiquitination of numerous CRL substrate proteins, such as DNA replication factor CDT1 (cdc10-dependent transcript 1), the NF-κB transcription factor inhibitor pIκBα, and the cell cycle regulators cyclin E and p27 16, 17.
2. Cullins, DNA damage and repair
DNA damage is one of the most pervasive characteristics of tumor cells 18. Numerous biotic and abiotic stresses can result in DNA damage, such as genotoxic chemicals, ionizing radiation (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) radiation 19, 20. DNA damage mainly includes DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), DNA lesions, single-strand breaks, DNA base mismatches, and DNA crosslinks 21, 22, 23. Organisms have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to repair damaged DNA and maintain genome integrity. Generally, DSBs are repaired through nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), alternative NHEJ, or homologous recombination (HR) 19, 24. UV-induced DNA lesions and other DNA bulks are repaired by nucleotide excision repair (NER) 19, 25. Small and non-helix-distorting base lesions are repaired by base-excision repair (BER) 19. Single-strand breaks and DNA base mismatches are corrected by mismatch repair (MMR), while DNA crosslinks are repaired by Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway 19.
DNA damage can induce cascades of posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination and sumoylation 19. The biochemical and molecular studies have indicated that ubiquitination regulates and coordinates various pathways of DNA damage recognition, signaling and repair 19, 26. Two cullin proteins (CUL4A and CUL4B) associate with DDB1 and DCAF-type substrate receptors, forming numerous E3 ligases to promote substrate ubiquitination in response to DNA damage 27, 28. The DDB1-CUL4-DCAFs complexes can ubiquitinate histone H2A, H3 and H4 at sites of UV-induced DNA damage, thereby facilitating their removal from the nucleosome and promoting subsequent DNA repair 29. In different organisms, a variety of DCAFs have been reported to interact with CUL4-DDB1 in response to DNA damage and repair, such as DDB2 30, cockayne syndrome A (CSA) 31, two CSA homologues in Arabidopsis (CSAat1A and CSAat1B) 32, transducin-like enhancer of split 1 to 3 (TLE1-3) 33, WD40 repeat protein 5 (WDR5) 27, Drosophila lethal (2) denticleless protein (L2DTL) (also known as CDT2) and the Polycomb-group protein EED (also known as ESC) 33.
In human, CUL4A overexpression has been widely found in multiple cancer types, including breast cancer 34, ovarian cancer 35, hepatocellular carcinomas 36, adrenocortical carcinomas 37, and childhood medulloblastoma 38. However, the relevance between CUL4B and cancer remains to be determined. Mutations of the CUL4B gene are causally associated with human X-linked mental retardation 39. CRL4 ubiquitin ligase complex recognizes a variety of substrates involved in DNA damage and repair, such as DDB2, XPC (xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C), H2A, H3 and H4, UNG2 (uracil-N-glycosylase 2) and SMUG1 (single-strand-selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase 1) 10. DDB2 acts as a substrate receptor in complex with CUL4A and DDB1 to target another NER damage sensor (XPC) for ubiquitination, which can increase its affinity to DNA 10. Downregulation of DDB2 and its substrates limits NER activity, whereas enhanced DDB2 expression or knockout of CUL4A results in the increase of DNA repair efficiency following genotoxic insults, thereby protecting genome from carcinogenesis 10. Moreover, CRL4DDB2 E3 ligase also can target histone H2A, H3 and H4, facilitating the initiation of NER 29, 40. Both UNG2 and SMUG1 function to prevent mutagenesis by eliminating uracil from DNA molecules via cleaving the N-glycosylic bond and initiating the BER pathway 41, 42. CRL4 ubiquitin ligase can mediate UNG2 and SMUG1 degradation, thereby maintaining genome integrity 43, 44.
3. Cullins and cell cycle progression
Cells that progress through the cell cycle unchecked may eventually develop as malignant tumors 45. Cell cycle progression is controlled by a series of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), proteins interacting with cyclins and CDK inhibitors (CKIs) 46. The activity of CDKs is regulated by several mechanisms, including association with regulatory subunits, protein modification such as phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, and interaction with CKIs 46, 47. The levels of cyclins, CKIs and many other cell cycle regulators oscillate during the cell cycle as a result of periodic proteolysis through UPS 48. Two major ubiquitin ligases, APC/C and SCF, are responsible for the periodic proteolysis of many cell cycle regulators 49. The APC/C is required for the transition from M phase into G1, and this process is mediated by the ubiquitination of anaphase inhibitors known as securins and mitotic cyclins, respectively 50. The SCF complex targets cyclins and CKIs for ubiquitination, functioning in most phases of the cell cycle 48. The SCF complex can bind to multiple F-box proteins functioning as receptor components and three of these F-box proteins including Skp2, FBXW7, and β-transducin repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP, also known as FBXW1) are well characterized and implicated in cell cycle regulation 51. Clinical evidence suggests that dysregulation of these F-box proteins contributes to human cancers 15.
Skp2 behaves as an oncogene in cell systems and overexpression of Skp2 is frequently observed in human cancer progression and metastasis 52. Multiple cancer types, including lymphomas, prostate cancer, melanoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, pancreatic cancer and breast carcinomas, have been reported to associate with Skp2 overexpression 11. Biochemically, Skp2 functions as the substrate-recruiting component of SCF complex, and SCFSkp2 can recognize and promote the degradation of several negative cell cycle regulators, including p27, p21, p130 and p57 53. The expression of Skp2 is significantly increased in many transformed cells during S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, but not in G1 54. Additionally, Skp2 mediates the ubiquitination of the p27, which is degraded via the UPS in G1 phase 48. The CDK inhibitor p27Kip1 is also involved in cancer, playing roles in inhibiting cyclin E-CDK2 complex 55. Levels of p27Kip1 are regulated by SCFSkp2 complex during cell cycle through proteasome system 55.
FBXW7 protein is a well-established cell cycle regulator and functions as tumor suppressor required for substrate recognition in an SCF complex 15. SCFFBXW7 can ubiquitinate several substrates involved in oncogenesis, including cyclin E, c-Myc (myelocytomatosis oncogene), c-Jun (jun proto-oncogene) and Notch, thereby promoting cells to exit from the cell cycle 10. Interestingly, FBXW7 binds to each of these substrates through a conserved phosphorylated domain known as the CDC4 phosphodegron 56. The in vitro analysis of FBXW7 gene silencing enhances the expression of c-Myc and cyclin E genes, and promotes cell proliferation 57. Thus, FBXW7 is crucial for preventing carcinogenesis as its important roles in cell cycle regulation 56.
β-TrCP is emerging as an important protein in carcinogenesis because of the deregulated proteolysis of its substrates 52. Previous studies have identified numerous substrates of β-TrCP, and these substrates can be divided into two main groups: cell cycle regulators such as CDC25A (cell division cycle 25 homolog A), CDC25B, WEE1, IκBα (nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, alpha), IκBβ, IκBε, p100 and p105, and pro-apoptotic regulators such as pro-caspase, p63, STAT1 (signal transducers and activator of transcription 1) 52. Importantly, β-TrCP plays critical roles in regulating cell cycle checkpoints, and the increased activities of the SCFβ-TrCP complex may promote tumor cell growth and/or genetic instability by accelerating cell cycle events 58. In response to DNA damage, β-TrCP contributes to CDK1 dysfunction by mediating the degradation of CDC25A in collaboration with Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1), thereby preventing cell cycle progression before the completion of DNA repair 59.
Moreover, other cullin proteins such as CUL3, CUL4A and CUL5 also have been demonstrated to contribute to cell cycle progression in cancer. CUL3 forms a complex known as BTB-CUL3-RBX1 (BCR) ubiquitin ligase, targeting cyclin E for ubiquitination and controlling S phase in mammalian cells 60. Overexpression of CUL3 in mice increases ubiquitination of cyclin E, but not other cyclins 60. Conversely, the deletion of CUL3 gene results in increased accumulation of cyclin E protein, and has cell-type-specific effects on S-phase regulation 60. CRL4 interacts with the substrate receptor CDT2, promoting protein ubiquitination in S phase and after DNA damage 61. The CRL4CDT2 complex can target a variety of substrates involved in cell cycle regulation, such as CDT1 62, p21 63, and Chk1 64. The CUL4A-DDB1 E3 complex can target tumor suppressor RASSF1A (RAS association domain family 1, isoform A) for degradation during mitosis 65. CUL4A depletion results in increased levels of RASSF1A protein, whereas overexpression of CUL4A and DDB1 significantly enhances RASSF1A protein ubiquitination and results in reduced RASSF1A protein levels 65. Overexpression of CUL4A antagonizes the ability of RASSF1A to induce M-phase cell cycle arrest 65. CUL5 is a target of microRNA-7 (miR-7) 66. Downregulation of miR-7 increases the expression of CUL5 to facilitate G1/S transition in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells 66.
4. Cullins and p53 pathway
p53 functions as a tumor suppressor through several mechanisms: (1) activating DNA repair proteins when DNA has sustained damage; (2) arresting cell cycle at the G1/S regulation point on DNA damage recognition; and (3) initiating cancer cell apoptosis 67. In normal cells, p53 is generally kept at low level by proteasome-mediated degradation, allowing cell cycle progression and cell proliferation 68. Under stress conditions, p53 is stabilized and activated through posttranslational modifications of itself and its regulatory proteins, eventually inducing the expression of downstream genes that are responsible for cell cycle arrest, DNA repair and apoptosis 69. E3 ligases are also involved in p53 pathway, and over 20 different E3 ligases have been identified to play roles in the control of stability, oligomerization, nuclear export, translocation of p53 to chromatin or nuclear foci 70. Interestingly, cullin proteins have been reported to directly interact with p53, or regulate p53 expression and its protein stability 71, 72, 73.
An F-box protein JFK (just one F-box and Kelch domain-containing protein) promotes p53 degradation through the formation of an SCF complex in which JFK serves as a substrate receptor 74. The CUL1 knockout mouse is lethal at E6.5 before the onset of gastrulation, associating with increased p53 levels and apoptosis in the embryonic ectoderm 73. The BZLF1 (BamHI Z fragment leftward open reading frame 1) protein directly functions as an adaptor component of the ECS (Elongin B/C-CUL2/5-SOCS-box protein) E3 ligase complex, targeting the phosphorylated p53 for degradation 75. Deletion of CUL3 gene in liver cells causes a persistent and massive expansion phenotype, which is dependent on differentiation and undergoes remarkable DNA damage, thereby leading to cell death 73. Interestingly, this process appears to be controlled by p53, as simultaneous loss of CUL3 and p53 in hepatic progenitors transforms these cells to highly malignant tumor-initiating cells that form largely undifferentiated tumors in nude mice 72, 73. CDT2 and PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) interact with p53, and regulate p53 poly-ubiquitination and protein stability through both MDM2 (mouse double minute 2 homolog) and CUL4A-DDB1 complexes in unstressed human cells 76. Moreover, PCNA and DDB1-CUL4A complex also regulate the proteolysis of MDM2 in response to UV-irradiation 76. Cells deleting CUL4A result in proliferation defects and genome instability, and the decrease of p53 levels 77. Moreover, expression of CUL4A increases the decay-rate of p53 and delays the accumulation of p53 in response to DNA damage 78. Recently, CUL4B has been reported to directly interact with p53 and induce its poly-ubiquitination 79. VACM-1 (Vasopressin-activated Ca2+-mobilizing 1, also known as CUL5) inhibits cell growth by a mechanism that involves MAPKs (mitogen activated protein kinases) and p53 signaling pathways 80. Additionally, the degradation of p53 by adenovirus E4orf6 and E1B55K proteins occurs via a novel mechanism involving an ECS E3 ligase 81. The cytoplasmic localized ubiquitin ligase CRL7 can bind to p53 and promote cell growth by antagonizing p53 function 71. Biochemically, CUL7 only causes mono- or di-ubiquitination of p53 in vitro, whereas MDM2 polyubiquitinates p53 in the same condition 71. In a proteomic screen for p53 interactors, CUL7 was also identified to efficiently associate with p53 82. The functional analysis indicated that induction of CUL7 by DNA damage attenuated p53 function 82.
5. Cullins and WNT pathways
WNTs and their downstream effectors regulate various cellular processes that are important for carcinogenesis and tumor progression, including tumor initiation, tumor growth, cell senescence, cell death, differentiation and metastasis 83. Cullin proteins, such as CUL1, CUL3 and CUL4, have been identified to involve WNT pathways 84, 85.
SCFβ-TrCP E3 ligase can specifically regulate the stability of β-catenin, thereby having a significant impact on cancer genesis 85. Recently, FAS-associated factor 1 (FAF1) has been reported to function as a scaffold protein and form a complex with SCFβ-TrCP E3 ligase, antagonizing WNT signaling by stimulating β-catenin degradation 86. Moreover, an F-box/WD40 protein, FWD1, form a complex with SCF, mediating ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of β-catenin 87.
KLHL12 (Kelch-like protein 12) is a substrate-specific adapter of a BCR E3 ligase complex 84. The BCRKLHL12 ubiquitin ligase negatively regulates the WNT-β-catenin pathway by targeting and degrading Dishevelled, which is a conserved protein that interprets signals received by Frizzled receptors 84.
The DDB1-CUL4 complex has been demonstrated to be a WNT-induced ubiquitin ligase 88. The CDK inhibitor p27KIP1 is tightly linked with human cancer 88. Interestingly, the WNT-induced p27KIP1 turnover is independent from classical SCFSkp2-mediated degradation in both mouse and human cells 88. Instead, the turnover requires CUL4A and CUL4B 88. Additionally, DDB1-CUL4B complex can negatively regulate β-catenin 89. The knockdown of CUL4B in mouse results in an increase in β-catenin levels 89. Immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that CUL4B and β-catenin form a signal transduction complex in Drosophila, mouse and human 89.
6. Cullins regulate the expression or stability of oncogenes
Cullin proteins are also involved in regulating the expression or stability of several oncogenes, such as c-Myc, c-Jun and IκBα.
c-Myc is a transcription factor that plays important roles in cell cycle progression, apoptosis and cellular transformation 90. Malfunctions in c-Myc have also been found in carcinoma of the cervix, colon, breast, lung and stomach cancer 91. c-Myc enhances the expression of CUL1 gene, promoting ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis and cell cycle progression through SCFSkp2 E3 ligase 92. TRUSS (tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated ubiquitous scaffolding and signaling protein) is a receptor protein of DDB1-CUL4 complex 93. The suppression of DDB1-CUL4-TRUSS E3 ligase stabilizes c-Myc protein in cancer cells 93. CUL7 can function as an oncogene that cooperates with c-Myc in transformation by blocking c-Myc-induced apoptosis in a p53-dependent manner 94. The MM-1 (Myc modulator 1) protein binds to c-Myc and represses transcriptional activity of c-Myc 95. Further studies indicate that MM-1 facilitates c-Myc degradation by recruiting proteasome and the ECSSkp2 E3 ligase 95. Interestingly, Skp2 interacts with c-Myc and participates in its ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation 96. Surprisingly, Skp2 acts as a positive cofactor for c-Myc-regulated transcription 96.
c-Jun is the firstly demonstrated as an oncogenic transcription factor, and it is required at the early stage of tumor development 97. Deletion of c-Jun can significantly suppress tumor formation 98. The human De-etiolated-1 (hDET1) promotes ubiquitination and degradation of c-Jun by assembling DDB1-CUL4A-RBX1 E3 ligase transcription 99. Ablation of DDB1, CUL4A or RBX1 by RNA interference stabilizes c-Jun and increases c-Jun-activated transcription 99. Biochemically, RBX2 regulates skin carcinogenesis by targeting c-Jun/AP1 (activator protein 1) and IκBα/NF-κB in a stage-dependent manner 100. RBX2 promotes ubiquitination and degradation of c-Jun to inhibit AP1 activity and AP1-induced neoplastic transformation in a mouse epidermal cell model 100. It appears that RBX2 inhibits tumor formation at the early stage by targeting c-Jun/AP1 and promotes tumor growth at the later stage by targeting IκBα/NF-κB 100.
IκBα functions to inhibit the NF-κB transcription factor 101. Biochemically, IκBα can be ubiquitinated by a SCF-like complex containing Skp1, CUL1, β-TrCP1 and β-TrCP2 102. All these components are cooperatively recruited to bind to a phosphorylated IκBα (pIκBα) produced by tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) stimulation 102. IκBα-E3 ligase binds to pIκBα and catalyzes the ubiquitination of pIκBα in the presence of ATP, Ub, and E1-activating and E2-conjugating enzymes 102. Further studies indicate that NEDD8 modification of CUL1 activates SCFβ-TrCP dependent ubiquitination of IκBα 103.
7. Cullins and apoptosis
Studies have revealed a high frequency of apoptosis in spontaneously regressing tumors and in tumors treated with cytotoxic anticancer agents 104. The cullin proteins such as CUL1, CUL3 and CUL4 are also involved in apoptosis.
CDK-associated CUL1 can promote cell proliferation and inhibit cisplatin-induced apoptosis in the AGS gastric cancer cell line via modulating the expression of p53, BCL2 (B-cell lymphoma 2) and BAX (BCL2 associated X protein) 105. CUL3-based poly-ubiquitination and p62-dependent aggregation of caspase-8 can mediate extrinsic apoptosis signaling 106. Caspase-8 is a critical initiator of the extrinsic apoptosis pathway, and the stimulation of death receptors 4 and 5 (DR4 and 5) induces CUL3/RBX1-dependent poly-ubiquitination of caspase-8 106. Further, the Ub-binding protein p62 promotes caspase-8 aggregation, augmenting the activation and full processing of the enzyme and thereby leading to robust stimulation of effector caspases and apoptosis 106. CUL4-DDB1CDT2 and CUL4-DDB1DDB2 E3 ligase complexes have been implicated in the proteolysis of cell cycle inhibitor p21, which can inhibit apoptosis following DNA damage 107. Moreover, cells lacking CDC7 expression undergo apoptosis after mild DNA damage, where CUL4-DDB1CDT2 E3 ligase induces Tob (Transducer of ErbB-2) ubiquitination and its subsequent degradation 108. However, CDC7 phosphorylates and interacts with Tob to inhibit the CUL4-DDB1CDT2-dependent Tob degradation in normal cells 108. Additionally, CUL4B promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of human osteosarcoma cells 109. In the osteosarcoma SAOS-2 cells harboring decreased CUL4B gene expression by RNA interference (RNAi), cell proliferation rate and clonability are significantly inhibited, whereas the apoptosis rate is greatly increased 109.
8. Cullins and Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1) pathway
HIF-1 is a basic helix-loop-helix-PAS domain transcription factor, and upregulation of HIF-1 is generally associated with tumor cell growth and progression 110. Some cullin proteins, including CUL2, CUL3 and CLU5, have been demonstrated to involve HIF-1 pathway.
Previous studies have indicated that neddylation plays a major role in modulating the HIF pathway through CUL2 111. The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) assembles with CUL2 and Elongin B/C, forming a protein complex, namely, CBCVHL 111. Remarkably, cells lacking pVHL induce the expression of hypoxia-inducible genes, including VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), GLUT1 (glucose transporter 1), and PDGF-β (platelet derived growth factor-β) 111, indicating the important roles of CBCVHL in HIF-1 pathway. Recently, inhibition of CUL2 neddylation has been demonstrated to stabilize HIF-1 in mucosal inflammatory responses 112.
A CUL3 substrate adaptor, namely, KLHL20 (kelch-like family member 20), can be induced by HIF-1 113. The CUL3-KLHL20 ubiquitin ligase-dependent pathway targets PML (promyelocytic leukemia) to potentiate HIF-1 signaling and prostate cancer progression 113. Additionally, the PML destruction pathway participates in a feedback mechanism to maximize HIF-1α induction, thereby potentiating multiple tumor hypoxia responses, including metabolic reprogramming, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration, tumor growth, angiogenesis, and chemoresistance 113.
RBX2 also can function as a HIF-1 target gene, and it can form a VCB E3 ligase with VHL, CUL5 and Elongin B/C in vivo, promoting VHL-mediated HIF-1α ubiquitination and degradation 114. Interestingly, the endogenous HIF-1α at both basal and hypoxia-induced levels is significantly increased upon RBX2 gene silencing 114.
9. Cullins and other pathways involved in carcinogenesis
Cullin proteins are also reported to involve some other pathways, such as oxidative stress and chromatin remodeling.
Oxidative stress affects the stability or expression of numerous key signaling proteins, such as nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), kelch-like protein 1 (Keap1), Ras, Raf, MAPK, ERK1/2, MEK, p38α, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), c-Myc and p53 115. Of them, Nrf2 and Keap1 can function together with CUL3 and their molecular mechanisms have been well studied 116. Nrf2 is rapidly degraded through a Keap1-CUL3-RBX1 E3 ligase-dependent mechanism 116. Keap1 functions as a substrate adaptor, and is responsible for bringing Nrf2 into the E3 complex, in which it utilizes its DGR domain to bind the N-terminal region of CUL3 116. RBX1 recruits the catalytic function of E2 by binding to the C-terminal region of CUL3 116. E2 catalyzes poly-ubiquitination of Nrf2 protein on the lysine residues of Neh2 domain 116. Additionally, CUL3 overexpression depletes Nrf2 in breast cancer, which is associated with increased sensitivity to carcinogen, oxidative stress and chemotherapy 117.
All of the human genome is packaged into chromatin. Chromatin remodeling proteins are gatekeepers and function as major determinants of accessory factors to nucleosome DNA, thereby allowing a wide repertoire of biological functions 118. Thus, aberrant expression or epigenetic modulation of remodeling proteins confers a unique ability to cancer cells, reprograming its genome for the maintenance of oncogenic phenotypes 118. The CUL4-DDB1-RBX1 E3 ligase can target histones for ubiquitination, and importantly, ubiquitination of histones may facilitate cell in response to DNA damage 119. Therefore, histone ubiquitination by CRL4 E3 ligase constitutes a novel mechanism through which CUL4 regulates chromatin function and maintains genomic integrity 119. Knockdown of CUL4A or CUL4B in HeLa cells significantly reduces the levels of H3 and H4 ubiquitination, but has little effects on H2A and H2B ubiquitination 119.
10. Conclusion
Collectively, cullin proteins play critical roles in cancer through a variety of mechanisms, including DNA damage and repair, cell cycle control, apoptosis, oxidative stresses, chromatin remodeling, regulation of oncogenes, signal transduction involved in p53 and WNT (Figure 3). In which, cullins proteins mainly function as scaffolds to form numerous E3 ligases, and these E3 ligases further recognize different substrates to participate in different cellular processes. Complete inactivation of CRLs causes tumor cell growth suppression, indicating that the major role of CRLs in cancer cells is to target and degrade tumor suppressor proteins in order to sustain an unlimited proliferation 5. Thus, this unique feature of cancer cells confers them much more vulnerable to be targeted against CRLs in therapy 5. It is clear that further studies to explore CRL functions and screen substrates of CRLs in different cancer types. To develop potential anti-cancer agents, it is important to focus on the development of CRL inhibitors by targeting cullin neddylation and CRL-mediated ubiquitination in the future.
Figure 3.
Cullin proteins affect multiple pathways involved in cancer. Cullin proteins play critical roles in cancer through a variety of mechanisms, including DNA replication and repair, cell cycle control, apoptosis, oxidative stresses, chromatin remodeling, hypoxia, regulation of oncogenes, and signal transduction involved in p53 and WNT. Proteins participate in these processes are also indicated.
Acknowledgments
We apologize to all authors whose contributions were not cited due to space limitations. We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Tongwan Li for critically reading the manuscript and for facilitating discussions.
References
- 1.Sarikas A, Hartmann T, Pan ZQ. The cullin protein family. Genome Biol. 2011;12:220–232. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-4-220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zimmerman ES, Schulman BA, Zheng N. Structural assembly of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2010;20:714–21. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sharma P, Nag A. CUL4A ubiquitin ligase: a promising drug target for cancer and other human diseases. Open Biol. 2014;4:130217. doi: 10.1098/rsob.130217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wei D, Sun Y. Small RING Finger Proteins RBX1 and RBX2 of SCF E3 Ubiquitin Ligases: The Role in Cancer and as Cancer Targets. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:700–7. doi: 10.1177/1947601910382776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhao Y, Sun Y. Cullin-RING Ligases as attractive anti-cancer targets. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19:3215–25. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sun Y, Li H. Functional characterization of SAG/RBX2/ROC2/RNF7, an antioxidant protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Protein Cell. 2013;4:103–16. doi: 10.1007/s13238-012-2105-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jackson S, Xiong Y. CRL4s: the CUL4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34:562–70. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang DD, Lo SC, Cross JV. et al. Keap1 is a redox-regulated substrate adaptor protein for a Cul3-dependent ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:10941–53. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.24.10941-10953.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kerzendorfer C, Hart L, Colnaghi R. et al. CUL4B-deficiency in humans: understanding the clinical consequences of impaired Cullin 4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase function. Mech Ageing Dev. 2011;132:366–73. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2011.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee J, Zhou P. Cullins and cancer. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:690–9. doi: 10.1177/1947601910382899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Z, Gao D, Fukushima H. et al. Skp2: a novel potential therapeutic target for prostate cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1825:11–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2011.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shen M, Schmitt S, Buac D, Dou QP. Targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013;17:1091–108. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2013.815728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rizzardi LF, Cook JG. Flipping the switch from g1 to s phase with e3 ubiquitin ligases. Genes Cancer. 2012;3:634–48. doi: 10.1177/1947601912473307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gong L, Yeh ET. Identification of the activating and conjugating enzymes of the NEDD8 conjugation pathway. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:12036–42. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.17.12036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang X, Li L, Liang Y. et al. Targeting the neddylation pathway to suppress the growth of prostate cancer cells: therapeutic implication for the men's cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:974309. doi: 10.1155/2014/974309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Soucy TA, Smith PG, Rolfe M. Targeting NEDD8-activated cullin-RING ligases for the treatment of cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:3912–6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Soucy TA, Dick LR, Smith PG. et al. The NEDD8 Conjugation Pathway and Its Relevance in Cancer Biology and Therapy. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:708–16. doi: 10.1177/1947601910382898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lord CJ, Ashworth A. The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature. 2012;481:287–94. doi: 10.1038/nature10760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jackson SP, Durocher D. Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO. Mol Cell. 2013;49:795–807. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rastogi RP, Richa, Kumar A. et al. Molecular mechanisms of ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage and repair. J Nucleic Acids. 2010;2010:592980. doi: 10.4061/2010/592980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Clauson C, Scharer OD, Niedernhofer L. Advances in understanding the complex mechanisms of DNA interstrand cross-link repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013;3:a012732. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ghosal G, Chen J. DNA damage tolerance: a double-edged sword guarding the genome. Transl Cancer Res. 2013;2:107–29. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-676X.2013.04.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang C. Essential functions of iron-requiring proteins in DNA replication, repair and cell cycle control. Protein Cell. 2014;5:750–60. doi: 10.1007/s13238-014-0083-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Davis AJ, Chen DJ. DNA double strand break repair via non-homologous end-joining. Transl Cancer Res. 2013;2:130–43. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-676X.2013.04.02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.D'Errico M, Teson M, Calcagnile A. et al. Apoptosis and efficient repair of DNA damage protect human keratinocytes against UVB. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10:754–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sato K, Sundaramoorthy E, Rajendra E. et al. A DNA-damage selective role for BRCA1 E3 ligase in claspin ubiquitylation, CHK1 activation, and DNA repair. Curr Biol. 2012;22:1659–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Higa LA, Zhang H. Stealing the spotlight: CUL4-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase docks WD40-repeat proteins to destroy. Cell Div. 2007;2:5. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-2-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jin J, Arias EE, Chen J, Harper JW, Walter JC. A family of diverse Cul4-Ddb1-interacting proteins includes Cdt2, which is required for S phase destruction of the replication factor Cdt1. Mol Cell. 2006;23:709–21. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang H, Zhai L, Xu J. et al. Histone H3 and H4 ubiquitylation by the CUL4-DDB-ROC1 ubiquitin ligase facilitates cellular response to DNA damage. Mol Cell. 2006;22:383–94. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Scrima A, Konickova R, Czyzewski BK, Kawasaki Y, Jeffrey PD, Groisman R. et al. Structural basis of UV DNA-damage recognition by the DDB1-DDB2 complex. Cell. 2008;135:1213–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fousteri M, Vermeulen W, van Zeeland AA, Mullenders LH. Cockayne syndrome A and B proteins differentially regulate recruitment of chromatin remodeling and repair factors to stalled RNA polymerase II in vivo. Mol Cell. 2006;23:471–82. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang C, Guo H, Zhang J. et al. Arabidopsis cockayne syndrome A-like proteins 1A and 1B form a complex with CULLIN4 and damage DNA binding protein 1A and regulate the response to UV irradiation. Plant Cell. 2010;22:2353–69. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.073973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Higa LA, Yang X, Zheng J. et al. Involvement of CUL4 ubiquitin E3 ligases in regulating CDK inhibitors Dacapo/p27Kip1 and cyclin E degradation. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:71–7. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.1.2266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen LC, Manjeshwar S, Lu Y. et al. The human homologue for the Caenorhabditis elegans cul-4 gene is amplified and overexpressed in primary breast cancers. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3677–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Birner P, Schoppmann A, Schindl M. et al. Human homologue for Caenorhabditis elegans CUL-4 protein overexpression is associated with malignant potential of epithelial ovarian tumours and poor outcome in carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:507–11. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yasui K, Arii S, Zhao C. et al. TFDP1, CUL4A, and CDC16 identified as targets for amplification at 13q34 in hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatology. 2002;35:1476–84. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.33683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dohna M, Reincke M, Mincheva A. et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma is characterized by a high frequency of chromosomal gains and high-level amplifications. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000;28:145–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Michiels EM, Weiss MM, Hoovers JM. et al. Genetic alterations in childhood medulloblastoma analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002;24:205–10. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200203000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tardat M, Brustel J, Kirsh O. et al. The histone H4 Lys 20 methyltransferase PR-Set7 regulates replication origins in mammalian cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:1086–93. doi: 10.1038/ncb2113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kapetanaki MG, Guerrero-Santoro J, Bisi DC. et al. The DDB1-CUL4ADDB2 ubiquitin ligase is deficient in xeroderma pigmentosum group E and targets histone H2A at UV-damaged DNA sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2588–93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511160103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dingler FA, Kemmerich K, Neuberger MS, Rada C. Uracil excision by endogenous SMUG1 glycosylase promotes efficient Ig class switching and impacts on A:T substitutions during somatic mutation. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44:1925–35. doi: 10.1002/eji.201444482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schormann N, Ricciardi R, Chattopadhyay D. Uracil-DNA glycosylases-Structural and functional perspectives on an essential family of DNA repair enzymes. Protein Sci. 2014 doi: 10.1002/pro.2554. doi:10.1002/pro.2554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Doseth B, Ekre C, Slupphaug G, Krokan HE, Kavli B. Strikingly different properties of uracil-DNA glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 may explain divergent roles in processing of genomic uracil. DNA Repair (Amst) 2012;11:587–93. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sharifi HJ, Furuya AK, Jellinger RM. et al. Cullin4A and cullin4B are interchangeable for HIV Vpr and Vpx action through the CRL4 ubiquitin ligase complex. J Virol. 2014;88:6944–58. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00241-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Crawford ED, Scholz MC, Kar AJ. et al. Cell cycle progression score and treatment decisions in prostate cancer: results from an ongoing registry. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30:1025–31. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.899208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lim S, Kaldis P. Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development. 2013;140:3079–3093. doi: 10.1242/dev.091744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cayrol C, Ducommun B. Interaction with cyclin-dependent kinases and PCNA modulates proteasome-dependent degradation of p21. Oncogene. 1998;17:2437–44. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nakayama KI, Nakayama K. Ubiquitin ligases: cell-cycle control and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:369–81. doi: 10.1038/nrc1881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nakayama KI, Nakayama K. Regulation of the cell cycle by SCF-type ubiquitin ligases. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005;16:323–33. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2005.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li M, Zhang P. The function of APC/CCdh1 in cell cycle and beyond. Cell Div. 2009;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-4-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Skaar JR, Pagan JK, Pagano M. Mechanisms and function of substrate recruitment by F-box proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:369–81. doi: 10.1038/nrm3582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Frescas D, Pagano M. Deregulated proteolysis by the F-box proteins SKP2 and beta-TrCP: tipping the scales of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:438–49. doi: 10.1038/nrc2396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jia L, Sun Y. SCF E3 ubiquitin ligases as anticancer targets. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2011;11:347–56. doi: 10.2174/156800911794519734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Egozi D, Shapira M, Paor G. et al. Regulation of the cell cycle inhibitor p27 and its ubiquitin ligase Skp2 in differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. FASEB J. 2007;21:2807–17. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7758com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lloyd RV, Erickson LA, Jin L. et al. p27kip1: a multifunctional cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with prognostic significance in human cancers. Am J Pathol. 1999;154:313–23. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65277-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Takeishi S, Nakayama KI. Role of Fbxw7 in the maintenance of normal stem cells and cancer-initiating cells. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:1054–9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Iwatsuki M, Mimori K, Ishii H. et al. Loss of FBXW7, a cell cycle regulating gene, in colorectal cancer: clinical significance. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:1828–37. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fuchs SY, Spiegelman VS, Kumar KG. The many faces of beta-TrCP E3 ubiquitin ligases: reflections in the magic mirror of cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23:2028–36. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Busino L, Donzelli M, Chiesa M. et al. Degradation of Cdc25A by beta-TrCP during S phase and in response to DNA damage. Nature. 2003;426:87–91. doi: 10.1038/nature02082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Singer JD, Gurian-West M, Clurman B, Roberts JM. Cullin-3 targets cyclin E for ubiquitination and controls S phase in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2375–87. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.18.2375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Havens CG, Walter JC. Mechanism of CRL4(Cdt2), a PCNA-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase. Genes Dev. 2011;25:1568–82. doi: 10.1101/gad.2068611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Abbas T, Dutta A. CRL4Cdt2: master coordinator of cell cycle progression and genome stability. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:241–9. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.2.14530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kim Y, Starostina NG, Kipreos ET. The CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin ligase targets the degradation of p21Cip1 to control replication licensing. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2507–19. doi: 10.1101/gad.1703708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Huh J, Piwnica-Worms H. CRL4(CDT2) targets CHK1 for PCNA-independent destruction. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:213–26. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00847-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Jiang L, Rong R, Sheikh MS, Huang Y. Cullin-4A.DNA damage-binding protein 1 E3 ligase complex targets tumor suppressor RASSF1A for degradation during mitosis. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:6971–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.186494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ma C, Qi Y, Shao L. et al. Downregulation of miR-7 upregulates Cullin 5 (CUL5) to facilitate G1/S transition in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. IUBMB Life. 2013;65:1026–34. doi: 10.1002/iub.1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bieging KT, Mello SS, Attardi LD. Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:359–70. doi: 10.1038/nrc3711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ponnamperuma RM, King KE, Elsir T. et al. The transcriptional regulatory function of p53 is essential for suppression of mouse skin carcinogenesis and can be dissociated from effects on TGF-beta-mediated growth regulation. J Pathol. 2009;219:263–74. doi: 10.1002/path.2600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Brooks CL, Gu W. New insights into p53 activation. Cell Res. 2010;20:614–21. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Brooks CL, Gu W. p53 regulation by ubiquitin. FEBS Lett. 2011;585:2803–9. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Andrews P, He YJ, Xiong Y. Cytoplasmic localized ubiquitin ligase cullin 7 binds to p53 and promotes cell growth by antagonizing p53 function. Oncogene. 2006;25:4534–48. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kossatz U, Breuhahn K, Wolf B. et al. The cyclin E regulator cullin 3 prevents mouse hepatic progenitor cells from becoming tumor-initiating cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3820–33. doi: 10.1172/JCI41959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Zhou W, Wei W, Sun Y. Genetically engineered mouse models for functional studies of SKP1-CUL1-F-box-protein (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligases. Cell Res. 2013;23:599–619. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sun L, Shi L, Li W. et al. JFK, a Kelch domain-containing F-box protein, links the SCF complex to p53 regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:10195–200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901864106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sato Y, Kamura T, Shirata N. et al. Degradation of phosphorylated p53 by viral protein-ECS E3 ligase complex. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000530. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Banks D, Wu M, Higa LA. et al. L2DTL/CDT2 and PCNA interact with p53 and regulate p53 polyubiquitination and protein stability through MDM2 and CUL4A/DDB1 complexes. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:1719–29. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.15.3150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kopanja D, Stoyanova T, Okur MN. et al. Proliferation defects and genome instability in cells lacking Cul4A. Oncogene. 2009;28:2456–65. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Nag A, Bagchi S, Raychaudhuri P. Cul4A physically associates with MDM2 and participates in the proteolysis of p53. Cancer Res. 2004;64:8152–55. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Thirunavukarasou A, Singh P, Govindarajalu G. et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase Cullin4B mediated polyubiquitination of p53 for its degradation. Mol Cell Biochem. 2014;390:93–100. doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-1960-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Van Dort C, Zhao P, Parmelee K. et al. VACM-1, a cul-5 gene, inhibits cellular growth by a mechanism that involves MAPK and p53 signaling pathways. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003;285:C1386–96. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00338.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Querido E, Blanchette P, Yan Q. et al. Degradation of p53 by adenovirus E4orf6 and E1B55K proteins occurs via a novel mechanism involving a Cullin-containing complex. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3104–17. doi: 10.1101/gad.926401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Jung P, Verdoodt B, Bailey A. et al. Induction of cullin 7 by DNA damage attenuates p53 function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:11388–93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609467104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Anastas JN, Moon RT. WNT signalling pathways as therapeutic targets in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:11–26. doi: 10.1038/nrc3419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Angers S, Thorpe CJ, Biechele TL. et al. The KLHL12-Cullin-3 ubiquitin ligase negatively regulates the Wnt-beta-catenin pathway by targeting Dishevelled for degradation. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:348–57. doi: 10.1038/ncb1381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Latres E, Chiaur DS, Pagano M. The human F box protein beta-Trcp associates with the Cul1/Skp1 complex and regulates the stability of beta-catenin. Oncogene. 1999;18:849–54. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Zhang L, Zhou F, Li Y. et al. Fas-associated factor 1 is a scaffold protein that promotes beta-transducin repeat-containing protein (beta-TrCP)-mediated beta-catenin ubiquitination and degradation. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:30701–10. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.353524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kitagawa M, Hatakeyama S, Shirane M. et al. An F-box protein, FWD1, mediates ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of beta-catenin. EMBO J. 1999;18:2401–10. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Miranda-Carboni GA, Krum SA, Yee K. et al. A functional link between Wnt signaling and SKP2-independent p27 turnover in mammary tumors. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3121–34. doi: 10.1101/gad.1692808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Tripathi R, Kota SK, Srinivas UK. Cullin4B/E3-ubiquitin ligase negatively regulates beta-catenin. J Biosci. 2007;32:1133–8. doi: 10.1007/s12038-007-0114-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hoffman B, Liebermann DA. Apoptotic signaling by c-MYC. Oncogene. 2008;27:6462–72. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Tsai MM, Wang CS, Tsai CY. et al. Potential prognostic, diagnostic and therapeutic markers for human gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:13791–803. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.O'Hagan RC, Ohh M, David G. et al. Myc-enhanced expression of Cul1 promotes ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis and cell cycle progression. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2185–91. doi: 10.1101/gad.827200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Choi SH, Wright JB, Gerber SA, Cole MD. Myc protein is stabilized by suppression of a novel E3 ligase complex in cancer cells. Genes Dev. 2010;24:1236–41. doi: 10.1101/gad.1920310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kim SS, Shago M, Kaustov L. et al. CUL7 is a novel antiapoptotic oncogene. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9616–22. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kimura Y, Nagao A, Fujioka Y, Satou A, Taira T, Iguchi-Ariga SM. et al. MM-1 facilitates degradation of c-Myc by recruiting proteasome and a novel ubiquitin E3 ligase. Int J Oncol. 2007;31:829–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.von der Lehr N, Johansson S, Wu S. et al. The F-box protein Skp2 participates in c-Myc proteosomal degradation and acts as a cofactor for c-Myc-regulated transcription. Mol Cell. 2003;11:1189–200. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00193-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Vogt PK. Fortuitous convergences: the beginnings of JUN. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:465–9. doi: 10.1038/nrc818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Eferl R, Ricci R, Kenner L. et al. Liver tumor development. c-Jun antagonizes the proapoptotic activity of p53. Cell. 2003;112:181–92. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wertz IE, O'Rourke KM, Zhang Z. et al. Human De-etiolated-1 regulates c-Jun by assembling a CUL4A ubiquitin ligase. Science. 2004;303:1371–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1093549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Gu Q, Bowden GT, Normolle D, Sun Y. SAG/ROC2 E3 ligase regulates skin carcinogenesis by stage-dependent targeting of c-Jun/AP1 and IkappaB-alpha/NF-kappaB. J Cell Biol. 2007;178:1009–23. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200612067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Huxford T, Huang DB, Malek S, Ghosh G. The crystal structure of the IkappaBalpha/NF-kappaB complex reveals mechanisms of NF-kappaB inactivation. Cell. 1998;95:759–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81699-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Suzuki H, Chiba T, Kobayashi M. et al. IkappaBalpha ubiquitination is catalyzed by an SCF-like complex containing Skp1, cullin-1, and two F-box/WD40-repeat proteins, betaTrCP1 and betaTrCP2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;256:127–32. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Read MA, Brownell JE, Gladysheva TB. et al. Nedd8 modification of cul-1 activates SCF(beta(TrCP))-dependent ubiquitination of IkappaBalpha. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:2326–33. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.7.2326-2333.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Lowe SW, Lin AW. Apoptosis in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:485–95. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.3.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Zheng Q, Zhao LY, Kong Y. et al. CDK-associated Cullin 1 can promote cell proliferation and inhibit cisplatin-induced apoptosis in the AGS gastric cancer cell line. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:5. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Jin Z, Li Y, Pitti R. et al. Cullin3-based polyubiquitination and p62-dependent aggregation of caspase-8 mediate extrinsic apoptosis signaling. Cell. 2009;137:721–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Bagchi S, Raychaudhuri P. Damaged-DNA Binding Protein-2 Drives Apoptosis Following DNA Damage. Cell Div. 2010;5:3. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-5-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Suzuki T, Tsuzuku J, Hayashi A. et al. Inhibition of DNA damage-induced apoptosis through Cdc7-mediated stabilization of Tob. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:40256–65. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.353805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Chen Z, Shen BL, Fu QG. et al. CUL4B promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of human osteosarcoma cells. Oncol Rep. 2014;32:2047–53. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Torti SV, Torti FM. Iron and cancer: more ore to be mined. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:342–55. doi: 10.1038/nrc3495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Liakopoulos D, Busgen T, Brychzy A. et al. Conjugation of the ubiquitin-like protein NEDD8 to cullin-2 is linked to von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:5510–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Curtis VF, Ehrentraut SF, Campbell EL, Stabilization of HIF through inhibition of Cullin-2 neddylation is protective in mucosal inflammatory responses. FASEB J. 2014. doi:fj.14-259663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 113.Yuan WC, Lee YR, Huang SF. et al. A Cullin3-KLHL20 Ubiquitin ligase-dependent pathway targets PML to potentiate HIF-1 signaling and prostate cancer progression. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:214–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Tan M, Gu Q, He H. et al. SAG/ROC2/RBX2 is a HIF-1 target gene that promotes HIF-1 alpha ubiquitination and degradation. Oncogene. 2008;27:1404–11. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Sosa V, Moline T, Somoza R. et al. Oxidative stress and cancer: an overview. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12:376–90. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Ma Q. Role of nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013;53:401–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Loignon M, Miao W, Hu L. et al. Cul3 overexpression depletes Nrf2 in breast cancer and is associated with sensitivity to carcinogens, to oxidative stress, and to chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:2432–40. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Nair SS, Kumar R. Chromatin remodeling in cancer: a gateway to regulate gene transcription. Mol Oncol. 2012;6:611–9. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Dai Q, Wang H. Cullin 4 makes its mark on chromatin. Cell Div. 2006;1:14. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-1-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



