Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Eye Res. 2015 Apr;133:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.09.003

Mechanical Interactions and Crosstalk between Corneal Keratocytes and the Extracellular Matrix

W Matthew Petroll 1, Miguel Miron-Mendoza 1
PMCID: PMC4379425  NIHMSID: NIHMS630230  PMID: 25819454

Abstract

The generation of cellular forces and the application of these physical forces to the ECM play a central role in mediating matrix patterning and remodeling during fundamental processes such as developmental morphogenesis and wound healing. In addition to growth factors and other biochemical factors that can modulate the keratocyte mechanical phenotype, another key player in the regulation of cell-induced ECM patterning is the mechanical state of the ECM itself. In this review we provide an overview of the biochemical and biophysical factors regulating the mechanical interactions between corneal keratocytes and the stromal ECM at the cellular level. We first provide an overview of how Rho GTPases regulate the sub-cellular pattern of force generation by corneal keratocytes, and the impact these forces have on the surrounding ECM. We next review how feedback from local matrix structural and mechanical properties can modulate keratocyte phenotype and mechanical activity. Throughout this review, we provide examples of how these biophysical interactions may contribute to clinical outcomes, with a focus on corneal wound healing.

Keywords: Extracellular Matrix, Corneal Stroma, Corneal keratocytes, Cell Mechanics, Mechanobiology

1. Introduction

The cornea is an optically clear tissue that forms the front surface of the eye, and accounts for nearly two-thirds of its refractive power. The corneal stroma, which makes up 90% of corneal thickness, is a highly ordered structure consisting of approximately 200 collagen lamellae (Pepose and Ubels, 1992). Corneal stromal cells (keratocytes) reside between the collagen lamellae, and are responsible for secreting extracellular matrix (ECM) components required to develop and maintain normal corneal structure and function (Chakravarti et al., 2000; Funderburgh et al., 2003; Hassell and Birk, 2010). In addition to their role in matrix synthesis, the mechanical activity of corneal keratocytes (i.e. the generation of cellular forces and the application of these physical forces to the ECM) plays a central role in mediating fundamental processes such as developmental morphogenesis and wound healing. In general, cellular forces organize ECM into tissue-specific patterns during embryonic development, and feedback between cell and matrix mechanics is a key factor regulating this process (Bard and Higginson, 1977; Engler et al., 2006; Krieg et al., 2008; Stopak and Harris, 1982; Stopak et al., 1985).

As in development, corneal wound healing following lacerating injury, penetrating keratoplasty or refractive surgery involves an ordered sequence of cell-matrix mechanical interactions (Jester et al., 1999b; Netto et al., 2005; Stepp et al., 2014; Wilson, 2012). In the corneal stroma, quiescent keratocytes normally have a dendritic morphology and a cortical distribution of f-actin (Jester et al., 1994). From a mechanical standpoint, resting keratocytes are considered quiescent; they do not express stress fibers or generate substantial contractile forces (Jester et al., 1994; Lakshman et al., 2010). Following injury or surgery, corneal keratocytes surrounding the area of injury generally become activated by cytokines present in the wound environment, and transform into a fibroblastic repair phenotype (Garana et al., 1992; Moller-Pedersen et al., 1998b; Stramer et al., 2003). Corneal fibroblasts proliferate, develop intracellular stress fibers, migrate into the wound and reorganize the ECM through the application of mechanical forces.

In certain wound types, the presence of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) in the wound induces transformation of corneal fibroblasts to a myofibroblasts phenotype. Corneal myofibroblasts express α-smooth muscle actin, generate even stronger forces on the matrix and synthesize a disorganized fibrotic ECM (Blalock et al., 2003; Jester et al., 1999a). Together these processes can alter corneal shape both through the addition of tissue (Moller-Pedersen et al., 2000), as well as the redistribution of mechanical load bearing and tension within the stroma (Dupps and Wilson, 2006; Ruberti et al., 2011). Fibrotic wound healing can also reduce transparency due to increased light scattering by both cells and the newly synthesized ECM (Boote et al., 2012; Jester et al., 2012; Moller-Pedersen et al., 1998a). Overall, a better understanding of the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms that regulate the biomechanical activities corneal fibroblasts could ultimately lead to more effective approaches to modulating the wound healing response in vivo.

The Rho-family of small GTPases such as Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 play a central role in mediating the changes in cell mechanical activity in response to growth factors and other cytokines in a variety of cell types (Amano et al., 2010; Hall, 2005; Jaffe and Hall, 2005; Wang et al., 2013). These GTP binding proteins function as molecular switches; alternating between the active GTP-bound state and the inactive GDP-bound state. In fibroblasts on rigid 2-D substrates, activated Rho stimulates the formation of stress fibers and the development of focal contacts (Anderson et al., 2004; Parizi et al., 2000; Rottner et al., 1999; Sander et al., 1999; Totsukawa et al., 2000), and these cytoskeletal changes are dependent on actomyosin contraction (Jester and Chang, 2003; Rottner et al., 1999). Activated Rho binds to and activates Rho kinase, which inhibits myosin light chain (MLC) phosphatase, resulting in elevated MLC phosphorylation and increased cell contractility (Amano et al., 1998; Amano et al., 1996; Chrzanowska-Wodnicka and Burridge, 1994; Kimura et al., 1996; Kolodney and Elson, 1993; Parizi et al., 2000; Rayan et al., 1996; Sanderson et al., 1992; Tomasek et al., 1992). In contrast to Rho, Rac induces cell spreading, via the creation of smaller focal complexes and actin polymerization (Demali and Burridge, 2003; Rottner et al., 1999; Sander et al., 1999; Svitkina and Borisy, 1999; Totsukawa et al., 2000). Rac activation enhances both cell spreading and migration within 3-D collagen matrices (Andresen et al., 1997; Grinnell et al., 2006).

In addition to growth factors and other biochemical factors that can modulate the keratocyte mechanical phenotype, another key player in the regulation of cell-induced ECM patterning is the mechanical state of the ECM itself. In the cornea, large shifts in the global distribution of ECM tension can be induced by lacerating injury, penetrating keratoplasty, or refractive surgery (Dupps and Wilson, 2006; Ruberti et al., 2011). In addition, the provisional matrix produced during wound healing is generally less dense and more compliant than normal corneal tissue. Diseases such as keratoconus can also produce changes in stromal structural and mechanical properties. Keratoconus corneas generally have reduced mechanical stiffness (Ali et al., 2014; Andreassen et al., 1980; Edmund, 1989; Morishige et al., 2007), and thinning of the central cornea in keratoconus patients induces a redistribution of tension within the stromal ECM (Ambekar et al., 2011). In contrast, treatment of keratoconus with UV cross-linking increases corneal stromal rigidity (Beshtawi et al., 2013). Overall, changes in ECM structure, stress and elasticity have the potential modulate both the acute and long-term responses of corneal keratocytes to a range of clinical conditions (Winkler et al., 2011).

In this review we provide an overview of the biochemical and biophysical factors regulating mechanical interactions between corneal keratocytes and the stromal ECM at the cellular level. We first provide an overview of how Rho GTPases regulate the sub-cellular pattern of force generation by corneal keratocytes, and the impact these forces have on the surrounding ECM. We next review how feedback from local matrix structural and mechanical properties can modulate keratocyte mechanical activity. Throughout this review, we provide examples of how these biophysical interactions may contribute to clinical outcomes, with a focus on corneal wound healing.

2. Modulation of Corneal Keratocyte Mechanical Behavior by Rho and Rac

2.1 Regulation of Keratocyte Contractility and Matrix Reorganization by Rho and Rho kinase

The Rho GTPases are prime candidates for regulating the mechanical interactions between corneal keratocytes and the stromal ECM during various phases of wound healing. In corneal fibroblasts, time-lapse imaging of cells plated on top or within restrained 3-D collagen matrices have shown that activation of Rho using lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), induces retraction of cell processes and a corresponding pulling in of the surrounding ECM (Petroll et al., 2008b; Roy et al., 1999). In contrast, inhibiting Rho kinase with the inhibitor Y-27632 induces rapid cell body elongation, formation and extension of dendritic cell processes, and a corresponding relaxation of cell-induced tension on the matrix (Figure 1) (Vishwanath et al., 2003). Static imaging of collagen fibril organization surrounding isolated corneal fibroblasts in 3-D culture has directly demonstrated increased ECM compaction and alignment when Rho is activated by serum (Hay, 1985; Kim et al., 2006; Tomasek et al., 1982). When Rho kinase is inhibited, this cell-induced matrix reorganization is significantly reduced (Kim et al., 2006). In order to quantify cell-mediated changes in matrix tension, Brown and coworkers developed a culture force monitor system in which cell-seeded collagen matrices are suspended between a fixed bar and a force transducer (Eastwood et al., 1994). A similar system was recently used to measure cellular force generation by corneal fibroblasts. Culture in serum induced a gradual rise in cell-induced matrix tension, which reached a plateau after 24 hours. Subsequent addition of Y-27632 produced a 64% decrease in the measured force produced by corneal fibroblasts (Zhou, 2014). Furthermore, pre-incubation with Y-27632 blocked the initial rise in matrix tension.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

FEM strain maps generated using ANSYS, showing regions of matrix tension and compression surrounding a human corneal fibroblast expressing GFP-α-actinin within a 3-D collagen matrix. A. Cell-induced ECM deformation is observed following culture in media containing 10% fetal bovine serum (S+). B. The magnitude of this deformation is reduced when the cell is switched to Y-27632 (10 µM). C. Stain on the matrix is reestablished after switching back to S+. Strain is shown relative to the “relaxed” matrix configuration determined by treating cells with Cytochalasin D and TritonX-100. (From Vishwanath et al, 2003)

In addition to serum and LPA, Rho kinase has also been shown to mediate fibroblastic transformation of keratocytes in response to basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) treatment, as well as myofibroblast transformation in response to TGFβ (Chen et al., 2009; Lakshman and Petroll, 2012; Yamamoto et al., 2012). Specifically, treatment with Y-27632 inhibits stress fiber formation, and blocks the induction of α-SM-actin expression and the increase in cell-induced matrix remodeling normally induced by TGFβ. Inhibition of Rho/Rho kinase has also been shown to block the decrease in keratin sulfate proteoglycan synthesis normally associated with corneal myofibroblast transformation, suggesting a linkage between increased cell contractility and altered ECM synthesis (Chen et al., 2009).

The role of Rho kinase in regulating corneal fibroblast migration mechanics has also been investigated, using a nested 3-D collagen matrix model that facilitates dynamic imaging of cell-matrix interactions during cell translocation. In this model, corneal fibroblasts cultured in serum-containing media generate significant tractional forces on the matrix during migration, as indicated by inward displacement and reorganization of collagen in front of cells (Karamichos et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2010; Zhou and Petroll, 2010). When Rho kinase is inhibited, cells became more elongated and form dendritic cell processes, and the rate of cell migration is significantly reduced. Interestingly, these dendritic cells are still able to generate tractional forces at the leading edge. Overall, these data suggests that Rho kinase impacts corneal fibroblast migration by affecting morphology, polarization, and mechanical coordination between the leading and trailing edges of cells (Amano et al., 2010; Zhou and Petroll, 2010).

Taken together, previous studies demonstrate that Rho kinase plays a central role in regulating corneal fibroblast contractility, migration and matrix remodeling in vitro (Anderson et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2006; Petroll et al., 2008b; Roy et al., 1999; Vishwanath et al., 2003). Recently, Koizumi and coworkers investigated whether topical application of Y-27632 could modulate in vivo corneal wound healing following lamellar keratectomy in a rabbit model (Yamamoto et al., 2012). After 21 days of treatment with Y-27632, the expression of α-SM actin was suppressed in the center of the wound, but not the periphery. In addition, while both treated and control corneas showed similar amounts of type I collagen matrix deposition and keratan sulfate during healing, the amount of Type III collagen was reduced in the Y-27632 group. Epithelial resurfacing was also delayed in animals treated with Y-27632. Since TGFβ1 can be produced by the corneal epithelium (Wilson et al., 2001), this delay in resurfacing may explain, in part, why the reduction in myofibroblast transformation was limited to the central region of the wound. Temporal assessment of the corneal keratocyte response to Y-27632 at earlier time points may shed additional light on its potential therapeutic role. It should be noted that Rho kinase inhibitors are also being evaluated as potential therapeutics for glaucoma, since they can inhibit trabecular meshwork contraction and thereby increase outflow facility (Inoue and Tanihara, 2013; Wang et al., 2013).

2.2 Regulation of Corneal Keratocyte Spreading, Migration and Tractional Force Generation by Rac

Rac is activated by platelet derived growth factor BB (PDGF BB) in both corneal and dermal fibroblasts (Grinnell, 2000; Sander et al., 1999). In time-lapse studies of corneal fibroblasts in 3-D matrices, PDGF-induced Rac activation stimulated rapid cell spreading, via elongation, ruffling and random branching of pseudopodial processes (Petroll and Ma, 2008; Petroll et al., 2008a). In general, relaxation (decompression) of the ECM was observed along the cell body, whereas tractional forces were generated by extending cell processes, as indicated by centripetal displacement of collagen fibrils at the ends of cells. Thus overall, there was a shift in the tractional forces on the matrix from the center to the periphery of corneal fibroblasts in response to Rac activation.

For quiescent corneal keratocytes maintained in serum-free conditions (in which the level of Rho activation is low), both global and local ECM reorganization induced by PDGF BB are comparable to that produced by basal serum-free media (Figure 2) (Lakshman and Petroll, 2012). Nonetheless, PDGF still stimulates more rapid cell migration through collagen matrices under serum free conditions (Kim et al., 2012a; Zhou and Petroll, 2014). During migration, PDGF induces repeated extension and retraction of dendritic cell processes which produce only small, transient matrix deformations. Local matrix reorganization produced by migrating cells in PDGF is significantly reduced as compared to serum or TGFβ1 (Figure 3). Following lacerating injury or incisional surgery, contractile force generation is needed to facilitate wound closure and prevent loss of the mechanical integrity of the cornea. However, following refractive surgical procedures such as PRK or LASIK, it is preferable to minimize cellular force generation and fibrosis during stromal repopulation, since these processes can alter corneal shape and transparency (Dupps and Wilson, 2006; Jester et al., 1999b; Moller-Pedersen et al., 2000; Moller-Pedersen et al., 1997; Netto et al., 2005; Petroll et al., 1992). PDGF stimulates keratocyte proliferation and has been shown to up-regulate synthesis of normal stromal ECM (Etheredge et al., 2009; Jester and Chang, 2003). Thus it is interesting to speculate that PDGF BB may contribute to stromal repopulation following injury or surgery through up-regulation of both proliferation and migration, without producing fibrotic tissue or generating large forces which can alter corneal shape and transparency.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Keratocyte mechanical behavior in constrained 3-D collagen matrices. A. Global matrix contraction assay. Cell-induced matrix contraction (decrease in matrix height) was significantly greater in media containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) as compared to PDGF BB (50 ng/ml) or basal serum-free media, after both 24 hours and 4 days of culture. B–D. Day four overlays of phallodin (green) and collagen (red) obtained using confocal fluorescence and reflection imaging, respectively. Corneal keratocytes developed a stellate morphology in 3-D matrices (B), with a cortical, membrane associated f-actin organization. In contrast, cells cultured in 10% FBS generally developed a more polarized morphology with thicker pseudopodial processes (C). Following culture in PDGF, cells developed long dendritic processes (D). In general, minimal compaction and realignment of collagen fibrils was observed surrounding cells cultured in basal media or PDGF. In contrast, collagen at the ends of cells in 10% FBS appeared to be compacted and aligned parallel to the ends of pseudopodial processes. (*- Significantly greater than all other conditions) (From Kim et al., 2012a)

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Maximum intensity projections of f-actin (green) and collagen fibrils (red) at the interface between the inner and outer matrices od nested constructs. A) Following culture in 10% FBS, migrating cells developed a bipolar morphology with occasional stress fibers along the cell body. Collagen fibrils were compacted and aligned parallel to the long axis of pseudopodia. B) Following culture in TGFβ1 (10 ng/ml), cells developed a broad morphology and intracellular stress fibers were observed. Collagen fibrils were compacted both around and between the cells. C) Migrating cells in PDGF BB (50 ng/ml) were more elongated and had branching processes. Collagen fibrils remained more randomly aligned around the cells. (From Kim et al., 2010)

3. The Impact of ECM Mechanical Properties on Corneal Keratocyte Behavior

3.1 Modulation of Cell Spreading, Migration and Matrix Reorganization by ECM Stiffness and Anisotropy

It is well established that mechanical signals from the ECM play a key role in regulating growth and function in a variety of cell types (Brown, 2000; He and Grinnell, 1994; Ingber and Folkman, 1989; Liu et al., 1999; Sadoshima and Izumo, 1997; Shyy and Chien, 2002; Tummina et al., 1998; van Bockxmeer et al., 1984). Increasing substrate stiffness can facilitate formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions in contractile cells (Miron-Mendoza et al., 2010; Pelham and Wang, 1997; Yeung et al., 2005), and both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that these structures tend to align along the tensile axis under anisotropic conditions (Kolodney and Wysolmerski, 1992; Takakuda and Miyairi, 1996; Wakatsuki and Elson, 2003). Alignment and global force generation parallel to the axis of greatest mechanical resistance by dermal fibroblasts, myoblasts and bone marrow stem cells has also been documented in 3-D culture models (Cheema et al., 2003; Eastwood et al., 1994; Eastwood et al., 1998; Huang et al., 1993; Mudera et al., 2000).

Studies using corneal fibroblasts have shown similar cross-talk between cell and matrix mechanics. In 3-D culture models, significant differences in cell alignment, morphology, and matrix reorganization are observed between constrained (anisotropic) and unconstrained (isotropic) rectangular matrices (Karamichos et al., 2007). Cells align nearly parallel to the long axis of the construct in matrices constrained at the ends, whereas cells in unconstrained matrices show no preferential orientation. Corneal fibroblasts also tend to align and compact collagen parallel to the axis of greatest effective stiffness under anisotropic conditions. Furthermore, in regions of high cell density within constrained matrices, bands of compacted and aligned collagen spanning between adjacent corneal fibroblasts are generally observed, suggesting mechanical coupling of cells through the ECM which leads to local amplification of matrix patterning (Karamichos et al., 2007; Petroll et al., 2004a).

Cell migration and spreading can also be influenced by the mechanical stiffness of the substrate. In 3-D matrices pre-fabricated with directional gradients in collagen density, fibroblasts migrate towards the stiffer region (Hadjipanayi et al., 2009), a phenomenum called "durotaxis" (Lo et al., 2000). To evaluate the effect of matrix mechanical properties on corneal keratocyte migration, migration has been compared in constrained and unconstrained nested matrix constructs (Kim et al., 2012a). Consistent with previous results using dermal fibroblasts (Grinnell et al., 2006), invasion of keratocytes into the outer matrix in 10% FBS was significantly reduced in unconstrained matrices, in which effective stiffness is reduced. Interestingly, the dependency of corneal fibroblast migration on matrix constraint was eliminated when Rho kinase was inhibited.

Migration of keratocytes cultured in PDGF BB, in which low levels of contractility are maintained, was also unaffected by changes in the effective stiffness of the ECM (Kim et al., 2012a). Thus while durotaxis appears to modulate the spreading and migration of corneal keratocytes that have transformed to a contractile fibroblastic phenotype, it does not appear to impact the motility of keratocytes that maintain a quiescent, low contractility mechanical phenotype. This is consistent with the concept that durotaxis only regulates contractile cells (Grinnell and Petroll, 2010)

3.2 Modulation of Keratocyte Mechanical Activity and Matrix Remodeling by Temporal Changes in ECM Stress and Strain

Time-dependent changes in ECM stress have also been shown to impact cell mechanical behavior. Using a tensioning culture force monitor system, Brown and coworkers demonstrated that stretching of 3-D matrices seeded with dermal fibroblasts resulted in a rapid increase in the measured force (Brown et al., 1998), which was immediately followed by a gradual cell-dependent reduction in force toward the baseline level. In contrast, reducing strain on the gel caused an initial loss of tension, followed by a cell-dependent increase back to the baseline level. Thus in both cases cells responded to mechanical loading in a way that maintained “tensional homeostasis” (constant tension) in their surrounding matrix. Consistent with this model, fibroblast force generation in 3-D matrices reaches a constant value that is independent of matrix stiffness (Freyman et al., 2002). Tensional homeostasis may be fundamental to the regulation of tissue tension under normal conditions, during development and also in response to injury.

Using a modified culture force monitor system (Zhou, 2014), a similar response to changes in matrix strain has been observed using serum cultured corneal fibroblasts (personal observation). In addition, the effect of dynamic changes in ECM tension on corneal fibroblasts has been investigated at the sub-cellular level, by using micropipettes to displace the collagen fibrils near a cell (Petroll and Ma, 2008; Petroll et al., 2004b). In these studies, reducing effective ECM stiffness by pushing toward the front of a cell resulted in rapid cellular shortening with corresponding ECM compression along the cell body (Figure 4A–D). This initial contraction is likely due to the release of isometric cellular contractile forces, since it is blocked by treatment with Y-27632. Following contraction, pseudopodial extension (spreading) was then observed at both ends of the cell. Interestingly, the ECM was pulled inward during this secondary spreading, and rapid turnover of focal adhesions was observed along extending pseudopodia. FEM analysis demonstrates that following the initial reduction of tension induced by the needle push, fibroblasts partially re-establish baseline tension during secondary spreading, consistent with the tensional homeostasis model.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Fibroblast response to ECM compression using small microneedle. A–D. Human corneal fibroblast following 2 days of culture in media containing 10% FBS, inside a 3-D collagen matrix. Needle was inserted axially into the matrix above the cell (A) without inducing changes in cell behavior (B). Pushing on the ECM towards the leading edge of a cell induced rapid cellular contraction and ECM compression along the cell body (C, arrows). This initial contraction was followed by re-spreading and tractional force generation (D, red tracks; crosses mark position immediately after needle push). E–H. Fibroblast response to ECM compression adjacent to cell body. Human corneal fibroblast 1 day after plating inside collagen matrix. Pushing small microneedles toward the side of the cell had no significant effect on cell morhpology or tractional force generation. (From Petroll and Ma, 2008)

In contrast to ECM compression parallel to the long axis of cells, compressing the ECM perpendicular to the long axis of corneal fibroblasts had little effect on cell morphology or mechanical activity (Figure 4E–H). This is also consistent with the tensional homeostasis model, since the cytoskeleton, focal adhesions and contractile forces are all aligned parallel to the long axis of bipolar cells, and therefore reducing the effective stiffness of the ECM alongside of the cell should have little impact on cellular tension. Overall, while durotaxis has been shown to regulate cell alignment and migration within collagen matrices under static conditions (Hadjipanayi et al., 2009), tensional homeostasis may modulate cell behavior in response to more transient changes in ECM tension in a 3-D environment. During developmental morphogenesis and wound healing, such dynamic changes in local matrix tension could be produced by the mechanical activity of nearby cells, and/or externally applied forces.

Recently, the effects of cyclic stretch on the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs) by corneal fibroblasts was also investigated (Liu et al., 2014). The results suggest that stretching magnitude determines whether the cornea undergoes matrix degradation or synthesis, by changing the balance between MMPs and TIMPs secreted by corneal fibroblasts. Overall, 15% stretching increased expression of MMPs and decreased expression of TIMPs, whereas 5% stretching increased expression of TIMPs and reduced expression of MMPs. These data suggest that fluctuations in corneal strain, produced by changes in IOP or eye rubbing, may induce or modulate keratocyte remodeling of the stromal ECM. These fluctuations would be larger under conditions in which the overall corneal stiffness is reduced, such as in keratoconus or following injury or refractive surgery.

3.3 Modulation of Keratocyte Growth Factor Responses by ECM Stiffness

The response of corneal keratocytes to growth factors can also be modulated by changes in ECM stiffnes. Several studies have shown that FGF2 induces fibroblastic transformation of keratocytes on rigid 2-D substrates, as indicated by changes in cell morphology and development of stress fibers and focal adhesions (Chen et al., 2009; Jester and Chang, 2003; Jester et al., 2002). However, within hydrated 3-D collagen matrices (which have high compliance), FGF2 stimulates ruffling of keratocyte processes without inducing major changes in cell morphology, formation of stress fibers, or collagen matrix organization (Lakshman and Petroll, 2012). When corneal keratocytes are seeded within compressed 3-D collagen matrices, fibroblastic transformation is again observed. Both glass and compressed collagen matrices are several orders of magnitude stiffer than a hydrated collagen matrix, thus substrate mechanical properties appear to modulate the phenotypic changes induced by FGF2.

Matrix stiffness also impacts the response of ocular cells to TGFβ treatment. For example, increased matrix stiffness has also been shown to enhance TGFβ-induced myofibroblast transformation of human tenon fibroblasts (Meyer-ter-Vehn et al., 2011)Consistent with these results, Murphy and coworkers recently demonstrated that corneal fibroblasts grown compliant polyacrylamide substrates had fewer stress fibers and expressed significantly reduced amounts of α-SMA as compared cells plated on rigid 2-D substrates (Dreier et al., 2013). In hydrated 3-D collagen matrices, treatment with TGFβ1 & 2 increases cell contractility, as indicated by the formation of stress fibers and stimulation of cell-induced ECM reorganization (Jester and Chang, 2003; Lakshman and Petroll, 2012). However, α-SM-actin labeling is negative for cells plated at low cell density within these compliant matrices. In contrast, approximately 20% of cells show positive labeling for α-SM-actin localized to the stress fibers at high cell density, where mechanical cross-talk between cells increases the tension within the matrix. A similar increase in stress fiber formation and myofibroblast transformation of corneal keratocytes is observed within compressed 3-D collagen matrices; further demonstrating that increased substrate stiffness enhances TGFβ-induced myofibroblast transformation of corneal keratocytes.

Both connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and PDGF have been shown to participate in TGFβ-induced myofibroblast differentiation through an autocrine feedback loop, which would be amplified at higher cell density (Garrett et al., 2004; Jester et al., 2002). While stress fibers were observed in all cells within compressed ECM irrespective of cell density, the percentage of cells with α-SM-actin incorporated into stress fibers was greater at higher cell density (~60% versus ~20%), suggesting that both mechanical stiffness and autocrine signaling promote myofibroblast transformation in vitro (Lakshman and Petroll, 2012). Interestingly, myofibroblasts tend to develop towards the end of the corneal wound repair process when cell density is high and the wound environment is stiffer, thus similar processes may be involved during in vivo healing.

Unlike FGF and TGFβ, keratocytes cultured in insulin growth factor (IGF) or PDGF BB maintain a quiescent mechanical phenotype over a range of ECM environments, including rigid 2-D substrates, compliant hydrated matrices and compressed collagen matrices (Lakshman and Petroll, 2012). Thus, the effects of these growth factors do not appear to be modulated by matrix stiffness. IGF increases keratocyte proliferation and stimulates synthesis of ECM components resembling normal corneal stroma, and also stimulates network formation (Berthaut et al., 2011; Etheredge et al., 2009; Jester and Chang, 2003). Thus it has been suggested that IGF may be involved in maintenance of normal corneal structure and could contribute to a regenerative wound healing phenotype (Etheredge et al., 2009; Jester and Chang, 2003).

3.4 Regulation of Corneal Keratocyte Differentiation by ECM Topography

In addition to matrix mechanical properties, nano-scale surface topography can also have a profound impact on cell behavior. Recent advances in micro and nano scale photolithographic techniques have led to the development of substrates with surface topographies (e.g. micropillars, grooves, ridges and pits) modeled after in vivo tissue matrices (Frey et al., 2006; Ghibaudo et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2012b; Kriparamanan et al., 2006). Interestingly, small changes in topographical parameters (i.e. height, depth, width and spacing) can produce significant changes in cell morphology and migration mechanisms (Ghibaudo et al., 2009; Teixeira et al., 2003; Teixeira et al., 2004). Aligned surface grooves have been reported to inhibit the transformation of corneal fibroblasts to myofibroblasts normally observed in response to TGFβ (Myrna et al., 2012). They also increase the alignment of cells and matrix within each layer of self-assembled sheets derived from corneal fibroblasts (Guillemette et al., 2009). On Transwell filters which have parallel, aligned grooves on the surface, human corneal fibroblasts stimulated with ascorbate analogs secrete and organize a more cornea-like ECM as compared to fibroblasts plated on planar substrates or disorganized collagen ECM (Guo et al., 2007; Karamichos et al., 2014; Karamichos et al., 2010; Ren et al., 2008; Saeidi et al., 2012). Thus substrate topography can modulate both the organization and differentiation of corneal fibroblasts.

3.5 Biophysical Regulation of Keratocyte Differentiation of Stem Cells

Differentiation of both embryonic and adult stem cells is also regulated by the chemical and physical characteristics or their microenvironment (Engler et al., 2006; Kshitiz et al., 2012; Reilly and Engler, 2010). Adult corneal stromal stem cells (CSSC), which express genes and proteins characteristic of quiescent corneal keratocytes (Du et al., 2005), are influenced by substrate structure, attachment and topography. In 2-D culture on planar substrates, CSSC cells do not secrete an abundant ECM, but as free-floating 3-D pellets they produce an ECM containing stromal-like molecular components and regions of aligned collagen (Du et al., 2007). Furthermore, when CSSC are cultured on an aligned nanofibrous substrata, they form a parallel lamellar ECM similar to that of adult corneal stroma (Karamichos et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2012). In contrast, on substratum of randomly oriented nanofibers, CSSC secretion and organization of a stroma-like ECM is significantly reduced (Wu et al., 2012). Thus overall, topographic cues from the substratum have a significant impact on the ability of CSSC to produce a cornea-like ECM. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into corneal keratocytes is also regulated by the physical environment, as indicated by the upregulation of numerous keratocyte markers when these cells were cultured as substratum-free 3-D pellets (Chan et al., 2013).

4.0 Conclusions

The mechanical interactions between corneal keratocytes and the stromal ECM are regulated not only by biochemical signals from growth factors and other cytokines, but also by mechanical signaling and feedback due changes in ECM structure, stress and elasticity. Changes in the activity of Rho GTPases appear play a central role in modulating corneal keratocyte mechanical behavior in response to both biochemical and biomechanical cues. Together these signals determine the pattern and amount of cellular force generation and ECM reorganization produced following injury or refractive surgery. Feedback between biochemical and biophysical signals can also modulate keratocyte differentiation, myofibroblast transformation, and matrix synthesis and degradation. Overall, mechanical interactions and crosstalk between corneal keratocytes and the ECM likely impact a range of fundamental processes in the cornea in both health and disease.

Highlights.

Keratocyte mechanical activity can alter corneal stromal shape and transparency

Rho kinase plays a central role in mediating increased cell contractility and ECM reorganization

ECM structural and mechanical properties also modulate keratocyte mechanical behavior

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by NIH R01 EY 013322, NIH P30 EY020799, and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., NY, NY.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  1. Ali NQ, Patel DV, McGhee CN. Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:3651–3659. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amano M, Chihara K, Nakamura N, Fukata Y, Yano T, Shibata M, Ikebe M, Kaibuchi K. Myosin II activation promotes neurite retraction during the action of Rho and Rho-kinase. Genes Cells. 1998;3:177–188. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1998.00181.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amano M, Ito M, Kimura K, Fukata Y, Chihara K, Nakano T, Matsuura Y, Kaibuchi K. Phosphorylation and activation of myosin by Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase) J Biol Chem. 1996;271:20246–20249. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amano M, Nakayama M, Kaibuchi K. Rho-kinase/ROCK: A key regulator of the cytoskeleton and cell polarity. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2010;67:545–554. doi: 10.1002/cm.20472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ambekar R, Toussaint KC, Jr, Wagoner Johnson A. The effect of keratoconus on the structural, mechanical, and optical properties of the cornea. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4:223–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderson S, DiCesare L, Tan I, Leung T, SundarRaj N. Rho-mediated assembly of stress fibers is differentially regulated in corneal fibroblats and myofibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 2004;298:574–583. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Andreassen TT, Simonsen AH, Oxlund H. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp Eye Res. 1980;31:435–441. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(80)80027-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Andresen JL, Ledet T, Ehlers N. Keratocyte migration and peptide growth factors: the effect of PDGF, bFGF, EGF, IGF-1, aFGF and TGF-beta on human keratocyte migration in a collagen gel. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:605–613. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.16.6.605.5081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bard JBL, Higginson K. Fibroblast-collagen interactions in the formation of the secondary stroma of the chick cornea. J Cell Biol. 1977;74:816–827. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.3.816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Berthaut A, Mirshahi P, Benabbou N, Ducros E, Agra A, Therwath A, Legeais JM, Mirshahi M. Insulin growth factor promotes human corneal fibroblast network formation in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:7647–7653. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Beshtawi IM, O'Donnell C, Radhakrishnan H. Biomechanical properties of corneal tissue after ultraviolet-A-riboflavin crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:451–462. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Blalock TD, Duncan MR, Varela JC, Goldstein MH, Tuli MH, Grotensdorst GR, Schultz GS. Connective tissue growth factor expression and action in human corneal fibroblast cultures and rat corneas after photorefractive keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1879–1887. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Boote C, Du Y, Morgan S, Harris J, Kamma-Lorger C, Hayes S, Lathrop K, Rob D, Burrow M, Hiller J, Terrill N, Funderburgh J, Meek K. Quantitative assessment of ultrastructure and light scatter in mouse corneal debridement wounds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:2786–2795. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown RA, Prajapati R, McGrouther DA, Yannas IV, Eastwood M. Tensional homeostasis in dermal fibroblasts: mechanical responses to mechanical loading in three-dimensional substrates. J Cell Physiol. 1998;175:323–332. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199806)175:3<323::AID-JCP10>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown TD. Techniques for mechanical stimulation of cells in vitro: a review. J Biomech. 2000;33:3–14. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00177-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chakravarti S, Petroll WM, Hassell J, Jester JV, Lass JH, Paul J, Birk DE. Corneal opacity in lumican-null mice: defects in collagen fibril structure and packing in the posterior stroma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3365–3373. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chan AA, Hertsenberg AJ, Funderburgh ML, Mann MM, Du Y, Davoli KA, Mich-Basso JD, Yang L, Funderburgh JL. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into cells with corneal keratocyte phenotype. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cheema U, Yang S-Y, Mudera V, Goldspink GG, Brown RA. 3-D in vitro model of early skeletal muscle development. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 2003;54:226–236. doi: 10.1002/cm.10095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen J, Guerriero E, Sado Y, SundarRaj N. Rho-mediated regulation of TGF-beta1- and FGF-2-induced activation of corneal stromal keratocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3662–3670. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chrzanowska-Wodnicka C, Burridge K. Tyrosine phosphorylation is involved in reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton in response to serum or LPA stimulation. J Cell Sci. 1994;107:3643–3564. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.12.3643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Demali KA, Burridge K. Coupling membrane protrusion and cell adhesion. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:2389–2397. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dreier B, Thomasy SM, Mendonsa R, Raghunathan VK, Russell P, Murphy CJ. Substratum compliance modulates corneal fibroblast to myofibroblast transformation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:5901–5907. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Du Y, Funderburgh ML, Mann MM, SundarRaj N, Funderburgh JL. Multipotent stem cells in human corneal stroma. Stem Cells. 2005;23:1266–1275. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Du Y, SundarRaj N, Funderburgh ML, Harvey SA, Birk DE, Funderburgh JL. Secretion and organization of a cornea-like tissue in vitro by stem cells from human corneal stroma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5038–5045. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dupps WJ, Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83:709–720. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2006.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Eastwood M, McGrouther DA, Brown RA. A culture force monitor for measurement of contraction forces generated in human dermal fibroblast cultures: Evidence for cell matrix mechanical signalling. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1994;1201:186–192. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(94)90040-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Eastwood M, Mudera VC, McGrouther DA, Brown RA. Effect of prcise mechanical loading on fibroblast populated collagen lattices: Morphological changes. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 1998;40:13–21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1998)40:1<13::AID-CM2>3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Edmund C. Corneal topography and elasticity in normal and keratoconic eyes. A methodological study concerning the pathogenesis of keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1989;193:1–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126:677–689. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Etheredge L, Kane BP, Hassell JR. The effect of growth factor signaling on keratocytes in vitro and its relationship to the phases of stromal wound repair. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3128–3136. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Frey MT, Tsai IY, Russell TP, Hanks SK, Wang YL. Cellular responses to substrate topography: role of myosin II and focal adhesion kinase. Biophys J. 2006;90:3774–3782. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.074526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Freyman TM, Yannas IV, Yokoo R, Gibson LJ. Fibroblast contractile force is independent of the stiffness which resists the contraction. Exp Cell Res. 2002;272:153–162. doi: 10.1006/excr.2001.5408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Funderburgh JL, Mann MM, Funderburgh ML. Keratocyte phenotype mediates proteoglycan structure: a role for fibroblasts in corneal fibrosis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:45629–45637. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303292200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Garana RM, Petroll WM, Chen WT, Herman IM, Barry P, Andrews HD, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Radial keratotomy II: The role of the myofibroblast in corneal wound contraction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:3271–3282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Garrett Q, Khaw PT, Blalock TD, Schultz GS, Grotensdorst GR, Daniels JT. Involvement of CTGF in TGF-beta-1-stimulation of myofibroblast differentiation and collagen matrix contraction in the presence of mechanical stress. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1109–1116. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ghibaudo M, Trichet L, Le Digabel J, Richert A, Hersen P, Ladoux B. Substrate topography induces a crossover from 2D to 3D behavior in fibroblast migration. Biophys J. 2009;97:357–368. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Grinnell F. Fibroblast-collagen-matrix contraction: growth-factor signalling and mechanical loading. Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10:362–365. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01802-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Grinnell F, Petroll WM. Cell motility and mechanics in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2010;26:335–361. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Grinnell F, Rocha LB, Iucu C, Rhee S, Jiang H. Nested collagen matrices: A new model to study migration of human fibroblast populations in three dimensions. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312:86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Guillemette MD, Cui B, Roy E, Gauvin R, Giasson CJ, Esch MB, Carrier P, Deschambeault A, Dumoulin M, Toner M, Germain L, Veres T, Auger FA. Surface topography induces 3D self-orientation of cells and extracellular matrix resulting in improved tissue function. Integr Biol (Camb) 2009;1:196–204. doi: 10.1039/b820208g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Guo XQ, Hutcheon AE, Melotti SA, Zieske JD, Trinkaus-Randall V, Ruberti JW. Morphologic characterization of organized extracellular matrix deposition by ascorbic acid-stimulated human corneal fibroblasts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:4056–4060. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hadjipanayi E, Mudera V, Brown RA. Guding cell migration in 3D: A collagen matrix with graded directional stiffness. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 2009;66:121–129. doi: 10.1002/cm.20331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hall A. Rho GTPases and the control of cell behaviour. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:891–895. doi: 10.1042/BST20050891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hassell JR, Birk DE. The molecular basis of corneal transparency. Exp Eye Res. 2010;91:326–335. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2010.06.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hay ED. Interaction of migrating embryonic cells with extracellular matrix. Exp Biol Med. 1985;10:174–193. [Google Scholar]
  46. He Y, Grinnell F. Stress relaxation of fibroblasts activates a cyclic AMP signaling pathway. J Cell Biol. 1994;126:457–464. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.2.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Huang D, Chang TR, Aggarwal A, Lee RC, Ehrlich HP. Mechanisms and dynamics of mechanical strengthening in ligament-equivalent fibroblast populated collagen matrices. Ann Biomed Eng. 1993;21:289–305. doi: 10.1007/BF02368184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ingber DE, Folkman J. Mechanochemical switching between growth and differentiation during fibroblast growth factor stimulated angiogenesis in vitro:Role of extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol. 1989;109:317–330. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.1.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Inoue T, Tanihara H. Rho-associated kinase inhibitors: a novel glaucoma therapy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;37:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Jaffe AB, Hall A. Rho GTPases: Biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:247–269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.020604.150721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jester JV, Barry PA, Lind GJ, Petroll WM, Garana R, Cavanagh HD. Corneal keratocytes: In situ and in vitro organization of cytoskeletal contractile proteins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:730–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jester JV, Brown D, Pappa A, Vasilou V. Myofibroblast differentiation modulates keratocyte crystallin protein expression, concentration,, and cellular light scattering. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:770–778. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jester JV, Chang J-H. Modulation of cultured corneal keratocyte phenotype by growth factors/cytokines control in vitro contractility and extracellular matrix contraction. Exp Eye Res. 2003;77:581–592. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(03)00188-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jester JV, Huang J, Barry-Lane PA, Kao WW, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. Transforming growth factoRbeta)-mediated corneal myofibroblast differentiation requires actin and fibronectin assembly. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999a;40:1959–1967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jester JV, Huang J, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. TGFbeta induced myofibroblast differentiation of rabbit keratocytes requires synergistic TGFbeta, PDGF and integrin signalling. Exp Eye Res. 2002;75:645–657. doi: 10.1006/exer.2002.2066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Jester JV, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. Corneal stromal wound healing in refractive surgery: the role of the myofibroblast. Prog Retinal Eye Res. 1999b;18:311–356. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(98)00021-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Karamichos D, Funderburgh ML, Hutcheon AE, Zieske JD, Du Y, Wu J, Funderburgh JL. A role for topographic cues in the organization of collagenous matrix by corneal fibroblasts and stem cells. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Karamichos D, Guo XQ, Hutcheon AE, Zieske JD. Human corneal fibrosis: an in vitro model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:1382–1388. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Karamichos D, Lakshman N, Petroll WM. Regulation of corneal fibroblast morphology and collagen reorganization by extracellular matrix mechanical properties. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5030–5037. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Karamichos D, Lakshman N, Petroll WM. An experimental model for assessing fibroblast migration in 3-D collagen matrices. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 2009;66:1–9. doi: 10.1002/cm.20326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kim A, Lakshman N, Karamichos D, Petroll WM. Growth factor regulation of corneal keratocyte differentiation and migration in compressed collagen matrices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:864–875. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kim A, Lakshman N, Petroll WM. Quantitative assessment of local collagen matrix remodeling in 3-D culture: the role of Rho kinase. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312:3683–3692. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kim A, Zhou C, Lakshman N, Petroll WM. Corneal Stromal Cells use both Highand Low-Contractility Migration Mechanisms in 3-D Collagen Matrices. Exp Cell Res. 2012a;318:741–752. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kim DH, Provenzano PP, Smith CL, Levchenko A. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. J Cell Biol. 2012b;197:351–360. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201108062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kimura K, Ito M, Amano M, Chihara K, Fukuta Y, Nakafuku M, Yamamori B, Feng J, Nakano T, Okawa K, Iwamatsu A, Kaibuchi K. Regulation of mysoin phosphatase by rho and rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase) Science. 1996;273:245–248. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5272.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kolodney MS, Elson EL. Correlation of myosin light chain phosphorylation with isometric contraction of fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:23850–23855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kolodney MS, Wysolmerski RB. Isometric contraction by fibroblasts and endothelial cells in tissue culture: A quantitative study. J Cell Biol. 1992;117:73–82. doi: 10.1083/jcb.117.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Krieg M, Arboleda-Estudillo Y, Puech P-H, Kafer J, Graner F, Muller DJ, Heisenberg C-P. Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:429–436. doi: 10.1038/ncb1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kriparamanan R, Aswath P, Zhou A, Tang L, Nguyen KT. Nanotopography: cellular responses to nanostructured materials. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2006;6:1905–1919. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2006.330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kshitiz, Park J, Kim P, Helen W, Engler AJ, Levchenko A, Kim DH. Control of stem cell fate and function by engineering physical microenvironments. Integr Biol (Camb) 2012;4:1008–1018. doi: 10.1039/c2ib20080e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Lakshman N, Kim A, Petroll WM. Characterization of corneal keratocyte morphology and mechanical activity within 3-D collagen matrices. Exp Eye Res. 2010;90:350–359. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Lakshman N, Petroll WM. Growth factor regulation of corneal keratocyte mechanical phenotypes in 3-D collagen matrices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1077–1086. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu C, Feng P, Li X, Song J, Chen W. Expression of MMP-2, MT1-MMP, and TIMP-2 by cultured rabbit corneal fibroblasts under mechanical stretch. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2014 doi: 10.1177/1535370214536650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Liu M, Tanswell AK, Post M. Mechanical force-induced signal transduction in lung cells. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:L667–L683. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1999.277.4.L667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lo CM, Wang HB, Dembo M, Wang YL. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J. 2000;79:144–152. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76279-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Meyer-ter-Vehn T, Han H, Grehn F, Schlunck G. Extracellular matrix elasticity modulates TGF-b-induced p38 activation and myofibroblast transdifferentiation in human tenon fibroblasts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:9149–9155. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Miron-Mendoza M, Seemann J, Grinnell F. The differential regulation of cell motile activity through matrix stiffness and porosity in three dimensional collagen matrices. Biomaterials. 2010;31:6425–6435. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Moller-Pedersen T, Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM, Jester JV. Corneal haze development after PRK is regulated by volume of stromal tissue removal. Cornea. 1998a;17:627–639. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199811000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Moller-Pedersen T, Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM, Jester JV. Stromal wound healing explains refractive instability and haze development after photorefractive keratectomy: A 1-year confocal microscopic study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1235–1245. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00142-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Moller-Pedersen T, Li H, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Confocal microscopic characterization of wound repair after photorefractive keratectomy using in vivo confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998b;39:487–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Moller-Pedersen T, Vogel M, Li HF, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Quantification of stromal thinning, epithelial thickness, and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy using in vivo confocal microscopy. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:360–368. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30307-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Morishige N, Wahlert AJ, Kenney MC, Brown DJ, Kawamoto K, Chikama T, Nishida T, Jester JV. Second-harmonic imaging microscopy of normal human and keratoconus cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1087–1094. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Mudera VC, Pleass R, Eastwood M, Tarnuzzer R, Schultz G, Khaw P, McGrouther DA, Brown RA. Molecular responses of human dermal fibroblasts to dual cues: contact guidance and mechanical load. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 2000;45:1–9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(200001)45:1<1::AID-CM1>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Myrna KE, Mendonsa R, Russell P, Pot SA, Liliensiek SJ, Jester JV, Nealey PF, Brown D, Murphy CJ. Substratum topography modulates corneal fibroblast to myofibroblast transformation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:811–816. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Netto MV, Mohan RR, Ambrosio R, Jr, Hutcheon AE, Zieske JD, Wilson SE. Wound healing in the cornea: a review of refractive surgery complications and new prospects for therapy. Cornea. 2005;24:509–522. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000151544.23360.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Parizi M, Howard EW, Tomasek JJ. Regulation of LPA-Promoted Myofibroblast Contraction: Role of Rho, Myosin Light Chain Kinase, and Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase. Exp Cell Res. 2000;254:210–220. doi: 10.1006/excr.1999.4754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Pelham RJ, Wang YL. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:13661–13665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Pepose JS, Ubels JL. The Cornea. In: Hart WM, editor. Adler's Physiology of the Eye. St. Louis: Mosby Year book; 1992. pp. 29–70. [Google Scholar]
  89. Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Dynamic three-dimensional visualization of collagen matrix remodeling and cytoskeletal organization in living corneal fibroblasts. Scanning. 2004a;26:1–10. doi: 10.1002/sca.4950260102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Petroll WM, Ma L. Localized application of mechanical and biochemical stimuli in 3-D culture. Dev Dyn. 2008;237:2726–2736. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Petroll WM, Ma L, Kim A, Ly L, Vishwanath M. Dynamic assessment of fibroblast mechanical activity during Rac-induced cell spreading in 3-D culture. J Cell Physiol. 2008a;217:162–171. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Petroll WM, Ma L, Ly L, Vishwanath M. Analysis of the pattern of sub-cellular force generation by corneal fibroblasts following Rho activation. Eye Contact Lens. 2008b;34:65–70. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181580d5b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Petroll WM, New K, Sachdev M, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Radial Keratotomy III. Relationship between wound gape and corneal curvature in primate eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:3283–3291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Petroll WM, Vishwanath M, Ma L. Corneal fibroblasts respond rapidly to changes in local mechanical stress. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004b;45:3466–3474. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Rayan GM, Parizi M, Tomasek JJ. Pharmacologic regulation of Dupuytren's fibroblast contraction in vitro . J Hand Surg [Br] 1996;21:1065–1070. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80317-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Reilly GC, Engler AJ. Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. J Biomech. 2010;43:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Ren R, Hutcheon AEK, Guo XQ, Saeidi N, Melotti SA, Ruberti JW, Zieske JD, Trinkaus-Randall V. Human primary corneal fibroblasts synthesize and deposit proteoglycans in long-term cultures. Dev Dyn. 2008;237:2705–2715. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Rottner K, Hall A, Small JV. Interplay between Rac and Rho in the control of substrate contact dynamics. Curr Biol. 1999;9:640–648. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80286-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Roy P, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Exertion of tractional force requires the coordinated upregulation of cell contractility and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 1999;43:23–34. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1999)43:1<23::AID-CM3>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Ruberti JW, Roy AS, Roberts CJ. Corneal biomechanics and biomaterials. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;13:269–295. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Sadoshima J, Izumo S. The cellular and molecular response of cardiac myocytes to mechanical stress. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997;59:551–571. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Saeidi N, Guo X, Hutcheon AE, Sander EA, Bale SS, Melotti SA, Zieske JD, Trinkaus-Randall V, Ruberti JW. Disorganized collagen scaffold interferes with fibroblast mediated deposition of organized extracellular matrix in vitro. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109:2683–2698. doi: 10.1002/bit.24533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Sander EE, ten Klooster JP, van Delft S, van der Kammen RA, Collard JG. Rac downregulates Rho activity: reciprocal balance between both GTPases determines cellular morphology and migratory behavior. J Cell biol. 1999;147:1009–1021. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.5.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Sanderson PL, Morris AM, Stanley JK, Fahmy NRM. Lipids and Dupuytren's disease. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74B:723–927. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B6.1447259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Shyy JY-J, Chien S. Role of integrins in endothelial mechanosensing of shear stress. Circ Res. 2002;91:769–775. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000038487.19924.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Stepp MA, Zieske JD, Trinkaus-Randall V, Kyne BM, Pal-Ghosh S, Tadvalkar G, Pajoohesh-Ganji A. Wounding the cornea to learn how it heals. Exp Eye Res. 2014;121:178–193. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Stopak D, Harris AK. Connective tissue morphogenesis by fibroblast tractionITissue culture observations. Dev Biol. 1982;90:383–398. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90388-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Stopak D, Wessels NK, Harris AK. Morphogenetic rearrangement of injected collagen in developing chicken limb buds. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:2804–2808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.9.2804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Stramer BM, Zieske JD, Jung J-C, Austin JS, Fini ME. Molecular mechanisms controlling the fibrotic repair phenotype in cornea: implications for surgical outcomes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4237–4246. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Svitkina TM, Borisy GG. Arp2/3 complex and actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin in dendritic organization and treadmilling of actin filament array in lamellipodia. J Cell Biol. 1999;145:1009–1026. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.5.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Takakuda K, Miyairi H. Tensile behavior of fibroblasts cultured in collagen gel. Biomaterials. 1996;17:1393–1397. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)87280-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Bertics PJ, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1881–1892. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Teixeira AI, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;71A:369–376. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Tomasek JJ, Hay ED, Fujiwara K. Collagen modulates cell shape and cytoskeleton of embryonic corneal and fibroma fibroblasts: Distribution of actin, a-actinin and myosin. Dev Biol. 1982;92:107–122. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90155-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Tomasek JJ, McConathy WJ, Checovich WJ, Mosher DF. Lipoproteins promote fibroblast-mediated collagen lattice contraction. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3:234A. [Google Scholar]
  116. Totsukawa G, Yamakita Y, Yamashiro S, Hartshorne DJ, Sasaki Y. Distinct roles of ROCK (Rho-kinase) and MLCK in spatial regulation of MLC phosphorylation for assembly of stress fibers and focal adhesions in 3T3 fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:797–806. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.4.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Tummina SJ, Mitton KP, Arora J, Zelenka P, Epstein DL, Russell P. Mechanical stretch alters the actin cytoskeletal network and signal transduction in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:1361–1371. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. van Bockxmeer FM, Martin CE, Constable IJ. Effect of cyclic AMP on cellular contractility and DNA synthesis in chorioretinal fibroblasts maintained in collagen matrices. Exp Cell Res. 1984;155:413–421. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(84)90202-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Vishwanath M, Ma L, Jester JV, Otey CA, Petroll WM. Modulation of corneal fibroblast contractility within fibrillar collagen matrices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4724–4735. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Wakatsuki T, Elson EL. Reciprocal interactions between cells and extracellular matrix during remodeling of tissue constructs. Biophys Chem. 2003;100:593–605. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4622(02)00308-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Wang J, Liu X, Zhong Y. Rho/Rho-associated kinase pathway in glaucoma (Review) Int J Oncol. 2013;43:1357–1367. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.2100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Wilson SE. Corneal myofibroblast biology and pathobiology: generation, persistence, and transparency. Exp Eye Res. 2012;99:78–88. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2012.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Wilson SE, Mohan RR, Mohan RR, Ambrosio R, Hong JW, Lee JS. The Corneal Wound Healing Response: Cytokine-mediated Interaction of the Epithelium, Stroma, and Inflammatory Cells. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001;20:625–637. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00008-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Winkler M, Chai D, Kriling S, Nien CJ, Brown DJ, Jester B, Juhasz T, Jester JV. Nonlinear optical macroscopic assessment of 3-D corneal collagen organization and axial biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:8818–8827. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Wu J, Du Y, Mann MM, Yang E, Funderburgh JL, Wagner WR. Bioengineering organized, multilamellar human corneal stromal tissue by growth factor supplementation on highly aligned synthetic substrates. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19:2063–2075. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Wu J, Du Y, Watkins SC, Funderburgh JL, Wagner WR. The engineering of organized human corneal tissue through the spatial guidance of corneal stromal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2012;33:1343–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Yamamoto M, Quantock AJ, Young RD, Okumura N, Ueno M, Sakamoto Y, Kinoshita S, Koizumi N. A selective inhibitor of the Rho kinase pathway, Y-27632, and its influence on wound healing in the corneal stroma. Mol Vis. 2012;18:1727–1739. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Yeung T, Georges PC, Flanagan LA, Marg B, Ortiz M, Funaki M, Zahir N, Ming W, Weaver V, Janmey PA. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 2005;60:24–34. doi: 10.1002/cm.20041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Zhou C. The Functional Roles of Rho-kinase and Matrix Metalloproteinases in Regulating Corneal Stromal Cell Mechanics in 3-D Collagen Matrices, Biomedical Engineering Program. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  130. Zhou C, Petroll WM. Rho Kinase Regulation of Fibroblast Migratory Mechanics in Fibrillar Collagen Matrices. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2010;3:76–83. doi: 10.1007/s12195-010-0106-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Zhou C, Petroll WM. MMP regulation of corneal keratocyte motility and mechanics in 3-D collagen matrices. Exp Eye Res. 2014;121:147–160. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES