Abstract
The new integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir (DTG) displays limited cross-resistance with older drugs of this class and selects for the R263K substitution in treatment-experienced patients. We performed tissue culture selections with DTG, using viruses resistant to older INSTIs and infectivity and resistance assays, and showed that the presence of the E92Q or N155H substitution was compatible with the emergence of R263K, whereas the G140S Q148R, E92Q N155H, G140S, Y143R, and Q148R substitutions were not.
TEXT
Although considerable progress has been made in HIV therapy, drug resistance has emerged for every available drug class, threatening long-term care and the potential for a cure (1). The first two integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs), raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (EVG), can be compromised by primary substitutions that generate resistance at the expense of fitness (2), the majority of which occur in the catalytic core domain of the integrase protein (IN). Although the newer INSTI dolutegravir (DTG) has not yielded resistance when used in initial therapy (3), our group selected an R263K substitution in HIV-1 IN in tissue culture with DTG (4). We showed that R263K, located in the C-terminal portion of the protein, confers moderate resistance to DTG and EVG, while also decreasing the biochemical activity of IN by ∼30% (5). The R263K substitution was also found in two of four INSTI-naïve treatment-experienced participants who failed DTG therapy in the SAILING clinical trial (of 354 patients) but otherwise continued to perform well (6). This suggests that R263K is a signature substitution for DTG.
In contrast, 7/51 individuals who previously failed RAL-based regimens and who possessed primary resistance mutations subsequently failed DTG-based therapy in the VIKING trial without R263K (7), suggesting that the substitutions that confer resistance to RAL or EVG might be incompatible with R263K.
(This work was largely performed by K. Anstett in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree at McGill University.)
To test this hypothesis, biochemical analyses of the strand transfer efficiencies of integrase proteins containing the E92Q, Y143R, Q148R, and N155H RAL or EVG resistance substitutions, both alone and in combination with R263K, were performed (Fig. 1). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed as described previously (4, 5) to introduce E92Q, Y143R, Q148R, and N155H into the wild-type (pET15bwt) and mutant (pET15bR263K) integrase subtype B expression vectors (primer sequences available upon request). Recombinant integrase proteins were expressed and purified and strand transfer assays were performed as published (4, 5). Table 1 summarizes the enzyme kinetics values Km and Vmax for each protein tested. Every single mutation had a significant negative impact on strand transfer activity, and this effect was exacerbated when these substitutions were combined with R263K. Among single mutant proteins, the Q148R- and N155H-containing integrases were the most impacted with regard to Km, with fold changes of 2.49 and 2.72 from the wild type (WT), respectively. Combinations of E92Q and R263K or Q148R and R263K resulted in the lowest levels of strand transfer activity (Fig. 1 and Table 1).
FIG 1.
Relative strand transfer efficiencies of mutant integrase proteins when concentrations of biotinylated target DNA were varied. Wild-type and R263K integrase proteins were included as internal controls in each panel. (A) E92Q ± R263K; (B) Y143R ± R263K; (C) Q148R ± R263K; (D) N155H ± R263K. Error bars show the standard error of the mean (SEM). The addition of R263K to each single-resistance mutation consistently led to a decrease in strand transfer activity.
TABLE 1.
Effect of classical INSTI resistance substitutions on cell-free strand transfer activity and NL4.3 infectivity in tissue culture
| Genotype | Result froma: |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell-free strand transfer assays |
NL4.3-infected TZM-bl cell assay |
|||||
| Km (nM) | 95% CI | FC | Vmax | Relative EC50 | 95% CI | |
| WT | 5.07 | 4.30–5.85 | 1.00 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 0.67–1.48 |
| E92Q | 9.67 | 4.64–14.69 | 1.91* | 46.27 | 1.46† | 1.08–1.96 |
| Y143R | 9.39 | 7.81–10.98 | 1.85* | 112.88 | 1.28† | 0.97–1.69 |
| Q148R | 12.60 | 5.17–20.03 | 2.49* | 48.07 | 6.06*† | 4.84–7.59 |
| N155H | 13.78 | 12.07–15.50 | 2.72* | 102.87 | 1.27† | 0.77–2.08 |
| R263K | 9.94 | 7.48–12.39 | 1.96* | 68.72 | 2.66* | 1.90–3.73 |
| E92Q R263K | 21.23 | 9.68–32.78 | 4.19*† | 21.08 | 3.78* | 2.72–5.26 |
| Y143R R263K | 18.03 | 10.63–25.43 | 3.56*† | 76.69 | 17.98*† | 11.61–27.60 |
| Q148R R263K | 26.64 | 8.83–44.46 | 5.26*† | 19.70 | 29.61*† | 8.53–102.83 |
| N155H R263K | 16.99 | 11.50–22.47 | 3.35*† | 76.14 | 1.19† | 0.86–1.64 |
Shown are the effects of primary integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance mutations ± R263K on the Km and Vmax (relative to the WT) in cell-free assays, the fold change (FC) for Km, and the EC50 (relative to WT) of NL4.3 virus in TZM-bl cells. The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are reported. *, P < 0.05 for Student's t test comparing each value (Km or EC50) to the WT value; †, P < 0.05 for Student's t test comparing each value (Km or EC50) to the R263K mutant value.
We then measured the effects of these mutations in isolation or with R263K on the relative infectiousness of NL4.3 virus as described previously (5). HIV-1 infectivity was measured through the infection of 30,000 TZM-bl cells per well using serial 1:4 dilutions of the NL4.3 variants. After 48 h, cells were lysed, and luciferase production was measured using the Promega luciferase assay system (Promega, Madison, WI). Each single substitution had a negative impact on infectiousness. The NL4.3IN(Y143R R263K) and NL4.3IN(Q148R R263K) viruses showed the greatest declines with increases in relative 50% effective concentration (EC50) of 17.9- and 29.6-fold compared to the wild type, respectively. The NL4.3IN(N155H R263K) virus had a significantly lower EC50 than did the NL4.3IN(R263K) single mutant (fold change of 1.2 for N155H R263K compared to 2.7 for R263K alone), suggesting that the addition of N155H partially restored the deficit in infectivity observed with R263K.
We next measured HIV-1 susceptibility to DTG, RAL, and EVG in tissue culture through the determination of the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) (Table 2). HIV susceptibilities to INSTIs were measured through infection of 30,000 TZM-bl cells using 200,000 reverse transcriptase (RT) units per well of each virus in the presence of 1:4 serial dilutions of drugs. Levels of infection were measured as described above. The NL4.3IN(R263K) virus displayed a 2-fold increase in resistance against DTG compared to the wild type, as previously observed (4, 5, 8, 9). The impairment of replication seen with the NL4.3IN(Y143R R263K) and NL4.3IN(Q148R R263K) viruses impeded data collection. The addition of R263K to NL4.3IN(E92Q) significantly increased the IC50 for DTG to 24.9 nM compared to 18.2 nM for the WT (1.4-fold), whereas the IC50s were 13.2 nM and 36.3 nM for NL4.3IN(E92Q) and NL4.3IN(R263K), respectively. Importantly, the addition of N155H to R263K, which partially restored the defect in infectiousness associated with the latter mutation, also increased resistance against DTG (from 2.0- to 3.3-fold relative to the WT).
TABLE 2.
Determination of IC50 values for wild-type and mutant NL4.3 viruses for DTG, RAL, and EVG
| Genotype | Result fora: |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTG |
RAL |
EVG |
|||||||
| IC50 (nM) | 95% CI | FC | IC50 (nM) | 95% CI | FC | IC50 (nM) | 95% CI | FC | |
| WT | 18.17 | 15.04–21.93 | 1.00 | 114.50 | 69.69–188.1 | 1.00 | 136.9 | 51.81–361.7 | 1.00 |
| E92Q | 13.20 | 9.52–18.28 | 0.73† | 325.20 | 124.8–847.2 | 2.84† | >5,000 | >50*† | |
| Y143R | 19.65 | 15.41–25.06 | 1.08† | 1,173.00 | 321.6–4,276.0 | 10.24*† | 282 | 39.27–2,022 | 2.06† |
| Q148R | 2.33 | 1.54–3.53 | 0.13*† | >5,000 | >50*† | >5,000 | >50*† | ||
| N155H | 1.81 | 1.31–2.50 | 0.10*† | 695.80 | 566.0–855.4 | 6.08*† | 646 | 387.9–1,076 | 4.72*† |
| R263K | 36.28 | 35.24–37.36 | 2.00* | 55.45 | 32.99–93.19 | 0.48 | 2,539 | 1,819–3,544 | 18.55* |
| E92Q R263K | 24.86 | 22.92–26.96 | 1.37*† | 277.60 | 134.8–571.7 | 2.42† | >5,000 | >50*† | |
| N155H R263K | 60.28 | 29.22–124.4 | 3.32* | 421.90 | 293.1–607.3 | 3.68*† | 889 | 439.7–1799 | 6.49*† |
| Y143R R263K | No data | No data | No data | ||||||
| Q148R R263K | No data | No data | No data | ||||||
Shown are the effects of primary integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance mutations ± R263K on IC50s in TZM-bl cells for dolutegravir (DTG), raltegravir (RAL), and elvitegravir (EVG). The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and fold change (FC) are reported.*, P < 0.05 for Student's t test comparing each IC50 to the WT value; †, P < 0.05 for Student's t test comparing each IC50 to the R263K mutant value.
The addition of R263K to the classical INSTI resistance substitutions did not have a major effect on HIV-1 susceptibility to RAL. The NL4.3IN(E92Q) virus was highly resistant against EVG, and resistance levels were unaffected by the addition of R263K. In contrast, the addition of R263K to N155H increased resistance to EVG by 1.4-fold.
Finally, we investigated whether RAL- or EVG-resistant viruses would permit the emergence of the R263K mutation during tissue culture selections in cord blood mononuclear cells (CBMCs) infected with various viruses in the presence of DTG (Table 3), performed as described previously (10, 11). The NL4.3wt, NL4.3IN(E92Q), and NL4.3IN(N155H) viruses were all able to select for R263K. Although none of the other combinations of substitutions were compatible with the emergence of R263K, the G140S Q148R mutant virus was able to select for H51Y, a secondary resistance mutation that has been associated with R263K in DTG resistance (5). As previously shown, the NL4.3 virus was unable to select for a compensatory mutation that could restore the decrease in fitness conferred by R263K (5, 9–11), suggesting that E92Q or N155H must be present first if R263K is to subsequently arise.
TABLE 3.
Emerging mutations in integrase detected by genotyping viruses containing INSTI resistance-associated mutations that were grown under DTG pressure for 30 weeksa
| Starting genotype | Drug concn (μM) | New mutation(s) selected |
|---|---|---|
| WT | 0.03 | R263K |
| E92Q | 0.05 | R263K |
| N155H | 0.10 | R263K |
| E92Q N155H | 0.05 | None |
| Q148R | 0.25 | Noneb |
| G140Sc | 0.50 | V13I, V54I, Q148R |
| G140S Q148R | 0.50 | K14R, H51Y/H, V54I |
Shown are changes in the integrase-coding sequence from HIV-1 subtype B NL4.3 clonal viruses during a 30-week dolutegravir (DTG) selection. The highest drug concentrations reached with each virus are noted.
Reversion to Q148.
G140S is a common secondary mutation to Q148R.
These results are consistent with recent clinical observations of the N155H resistance pathway in treatment-experienced patients failing therapy with RAL and DTG (12–14). Our results also explain the absence of the R263K mutation in participants in the VIKING clinical trial who failed DTG after having previously failed either RAL or EVG, as substitutions at positions 140 and 148 were common in that trial (7).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Peter K. Quashie, Melissa Wares, Marion Pardons, and Nathan Osman for scientific insight. Merck, Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc., and ViiV Healthcare supplied RAL, EVG, and DTG, respectively.
This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), which also funded K.A. through a Predoctoral Studentship.
REFERENCES
- 1.Wainberg MA, Zaharatos GJ, Brenner BG. 2011. Development of antiretroviral drug resistance. N Engl J Med 365:637–646. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1004180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shafer RW. 2006. Rationale and uses of a public HIV drug-resistance database. J Infect Dis 194(Suppl 1):S51–S58. doi: 10.1086/505356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stellbrink HJ, Reynes J, Lazzarin A, Voronin E, Pulido F, Felizarta F, Almond S, St Clair M, Flack N, Min S. 2012. Dolutegravir in combination therapy exhibits rapid and sustained antiviral response in ARV-naïve adults: 96-week results from SPRING-1 (ING112276), abstr 102LB. 19th CROI, Conf Retrovir Opportunistic Infect, Seattle, WA. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Quashie PK, Mesplede T, Han YS, Oliveira M, Singhroy DN, Fujiwara T, Underwood MR, Wainberg MA. 2012. Characterization of the R263K mutation in HIV-1 integrase that confers low-level resistance to the second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor dolutegravir. J Virol 86:2696–2705. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06591-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mesplede T, Quashie PK, Osman N, Han Y, Singhroy DN, Lie Y, Petropoulos CJ, Huang W, Wainberg MA. 2013. Viral fitness cost prevents HIV-1 from evading dolutegravir drug pressure. Retrovirology 10:22. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-10-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cahn P, Pozniak AL, Mingrone H, Shuldyakov A, Brites C, Andrade-Villanueva JF, Richmond G, Buendia CB, Fourie J, Ramgopal M, Hagins D, Felizarta F, Madruga J, Reuter T, Newman T, Small CB, Lombaard J, Grinsztejn B, Dorey D, Underwood M, Griffith S, Min S. 2013. Dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive adults with HIV: week 48 results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SAILING study. Lancet 382:700–708. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61221-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eron JJ, Clotet B, Durant J, Katlama C, Kumar P, Lazzarin A, Poizot-Martin I, Richmond G, Soriano V, Ait-Khaled M, Fujiwara T, Huang J, Min S, Vavro C, Yeo J. 2013. Safety and efficacy of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects with raltegravir-resistant HIV type 1 infection: 24-week results of the VIKING Study. J Infect Dis 207:740–748. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wares M, Mesplede T, Quashie PK, Osman N, Han Y, Wainberg MA. 2014. The M50I polymorphic substitution in association with the R263K mutation in HIV-1 subtype B integrase increases drug resistance but does not restore viral replicative fitness. Retrovirology 11:7. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-11-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mesplede T, Osman N, Wares M, Quashie PK, Hassounah S, Anstett K, Han Y, Singhroy DN, Wainberg MA. 2014. Addition of E138K to R263K in HIV integrase increases resistance to dolutegravir, but fails to restore activity of the HIV integrase enzyme and viral replication capacity. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:2733–2740. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oliveira M, Mesplede T, Quashie PK, Moisi D, Wainberg MA. 2014. Resistance mutations against dolutegravir in HIV integrase impair the emergence of resistance against reverse transcriptase inhibitors. AIDS 28:813–819. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Oliveira M, Brenner BG, Wainberg MA. 2009. Isolation of drug-resistant mutant HIV variants using tissue culture drug selection. Methods Mol Biol 485:427–433. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-170-3_29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hurt CB, Sebastian J, Hicks CB, Eron JJ. 2014. Resistance to HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors among clinical specimens in the United States, 2009-2012. Clin Infect Dis 58:423–431. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hardy I, Brenner B, Quashie P, Thomas R, Petropoulos C, Huang W, Moisi D, Wainberg MA, Roger M. 2014. Evolution of a novel pathway leading to dolutegravir resistance in a patient harbouring N155H and multiclass drug resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:405–411. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Carganico A, Dupke S, Ehret R, Berg T, Baumgarten A, Obermeier M, Walter H. 2014. New dolutegravir resistance pattern identified in a patient failing antiretroviral therapy. J Int AIDS Soc 17(Suppl 3):19749. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.4.19749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

