Abstract
Background
Risk factors for mitral annular calcification (MAC) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) demonstrate significant overlap in the general population. The aim of this paper is to determine whether there are independent relationships between MAC and demographics, traditional and novel CVD risk factors using cardiac CT in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) in a cross-sectional study.
Methods
A sample of 2070 subjects underwent coronary calcium scanning during the CRIC study. Data were obtained for each participant at time of scan.
Subjects were dichotomized into the presence and absence of MAC. Differences in baseline demographic and transitional risk factor data were evaluated across groups. Covariates used in multivariable adjustment were age, gender, BMI, HDL, LDL, lipid lowering medications, smoking status, family history of heart attack, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, phosphate, PTH, albuminuria, and calcium.
Results
Our study consisted of 2070 subjects, of which 331 had MAC (prevalence of 16.0%). The mean MAC score was 511.98 (SD 1368.76). Age and white race remained independently associated with presence of MAC. Decreased GFR was also a risk factor. African American and Hispanic race, as well as former smoking status were protective against MAC. In multivariable adjusted analyses, the remaining covariates were not significantly associated with MAC. Among renal covariates, elevated phosphate was significant.
Conclusion
In the CRIC population, presence of MAC was independently associated with age, Caucasian race, decreased GFR, and elevated phosphate. These results are suggested by mechanisms of dysregulation of inflammation, hormones, and electrolytes in subjects with renal disease.
Keywords: Coronary atherosclerosis, Mitral annular calcification, Cardiac computed tomographic angiography
Introduction
A high degree of correlation between risk factors for mitral annular calcification (MAC) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been previously shown in the general population [1–3] including age, female gender, diabetes mellitus (DM), and obesity. In these studies, however, the patient population included few subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD)[3, 4]. Among this group, cardiovascular disease is one of the most common causes of increased mortality [5, 6]. Patients with renal disease suffer from dysregulation of inflammation, hormones, and electrolytes resulting in significant relative increases in calcium deposits of the coronary arteries and cardiac valves [6–11]. Additionally, an association exists between MAC and coronary artery calcification (CAC) and coronary artery disease (CAD) [12, 13]. However, not all CKD patients have MAC. It is still unknown whether these increased calcium deposits are associated with traditional risk factors in the CKD population. Prior studies either lacked sufficient subjects or used echocardiography, which has low specificity in distinguishing dense collagen from calcification and leads to wide variation in MAC prevalence when compared to computed tomography (CT) [1, 2]. No previous study has examined the relationship between multiple traditional risk factors and MAC using Cardiac Computed Tomography (CCT) in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC). Therefore, the aim of this paper is to determine whether there are independent relationships between MAC and gender, race, age, and traditional and novel CVD risk factors, as well as metabolic variables such as calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), albuminuria, using CCT in CRIC in a cross-sectional study.
Methods
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at all participating centers and the scientific and data coordinating center. The cohort was established to examine risk factors for progression of chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients with CRI and identify high-risk groups, inform future treatment trials, and increase application of preventive therapies. The CRIC Network is composed of a Scientific and Data Coordinating Center as well as seven Clinical Centers across the U.S [14]. The current analysis included 2070 subjects who underwent coronary calcium scanning as part of the multi-ethnic CRIC study. The CRIC Study was designed to include a racially and ethnically diverse group of adult individuals who were aged 21 to 74 years and had mild to moderate CKD and approximately half of whom had diabetes. Recruitment strategies varied from center to center and included computerized searches of laboratory databases and medical records, and referrals from health care providers. Recruitment also occurred at clinics enriched with cases of CRI. Securing local physician approval and contacting potential screenees depended on local institutional review boards’ guidelines and the requirements of each medical facility. All participants provided written informed consent and HIPAA authorization. All creatinine levels are performed at a central laboratory and GFR is estimated based on the simplified modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation (GFR [mL/min per 1.73 m2] = 186 ×[serum Cr (mg/dL]−1.154 ×[age]−0.203 ×[0.742 if female] × [1.212 if black]) [14, 15].
Medical history, anthropometric measurements, and laboratory data were obtained for each participant at baseline and each annual in-person visit. Questionnaires supplied information about age, gender, race/ethnicity, and medical history. Current smoking was defined as having smoked a cigarette in the last 30 days. Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or on hypoglycemic medication. Use of antihypertensive and other medications were based on clinic staff entry of prescribed and over-the-counter medications. Resting blood pressure was measured three times in the seated position using a manual blood pressure cuff and the average of the 2nd and 3rd readings was recorded. Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, or use of medication prescribed for hypertension. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from the equation weight (kg)/height (m2). Total and HDL cholesterol were measured from blood samples obtained after a 12-hour fast. LDL cholesterol was calculated with the Friedewald equation. CRP was measured using the BNII nephelometer (N High Sensitivity CRP; Dade Behring Inc., Deerfield, IL) at the University of Vermont Laboratory for Clinical Biochemistry Research. Analytical intra-assay CVs ranged from 2.3 – 4.4% and inter-assay CVs ranged from 2.1–5.7%. The presence and number of risk factors for each subject was calculated based on the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines. Risk factors included: age (>45 years for men, >55 years for women), current cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, history of premature coronary artery disease in first-degree relatives (< 55 years in men, < 65 years in women), hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as use of cholesterol lowering medications or, in the absence of use of cholesterol lowering medications, a total serum cholesterol >200 mg/dL.
After signing informed consent, the majority of participants underwent two CT scans at year 1 for evaluation of CAC. Risk factors were assessed at time of scan. CT scans were obtained using either an Imatron C-300 Electron Beam computed tomography scanner or multi-detector CT scanner [16]. Thirty to forty contiguous tomographic slices were obtained at 3 mm intervals beginning one centimeter below the carina and progressing caudally to include the entire coronary tree [17]. Methods for CAC scanning have previously been published [15]. All scans were analyzed by Neo Imagery Technologies software package (City of Industry, California). Calcific lesions were identified by an attenuation threshold of 130 Hounsfield units and a minimum of 3 contiguous pixels, then was scored using Agatston’s algorithm. A density factor was assigned based on the following: 1 for lesions with peak attenuation of 130–199 Hu, 2 for lesions with peak attenuation of 200–299 Hu, 3 for lesions with peak attenuation of 300–399 Hu, and 4 for lesions with peak attenuation >400 Hu. The total CAC score was determined by summing individual lesion scores from each of four anatomical sites (left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery). The average of the two scores was used in the analysis.
Initially, MAC was dichotomized into the presence and absence of MAC defined as those with MAC=0 versus those with score > 0 [3, 4]. Differences in baseline demographic and transitional risk factor data were evaluated across MAC groups using t-test for continuous variables and the Chi-Square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, as appropriate. We described differences in demographics and risk factors between those with positive MAC scores and those with a 0 score. Then, we looked at only those who have positive MAC scores and assessed whether there were differences in age, gender, race and other risk factors.
We used logistic regression models to assess the relationship between each risk factor and the presence of calcium and adjusted for all other risk factors in the model. The odds ratios we estimate approximate relative risks because our endpoint is rare. The following covariates were used in the multivariable adjustment: age, gender, race, ethnicity, body mass index, HDL, LDL, lipid lowering medications, smoking status, family history of heart attack, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.3 (Cary, NC) and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Overall, among the 2070 CRIC subjects who underwent CT scanning, there were 1112 men (53.7%) and 958 women (46.3%). The average subject age was 58.0 years. Whites comprised the majority of the cohort (43%) versus black/African Americans (35%), Hispanics (17%), and others (5%). The average BMI of the cohort was 31 kg/m2, with mean HDL of 49 mg/dL, LDL 103 mg/dL, and estimated GFR 43 ml/min/1.73 m2.
Among tested patients, 331 had MAC with a prevalence of 16.0%. The mean MAC Agatston score was 511.98 (range 0.31–13,885.00, SD 1368.76). The prevalence of MAC was highest in whites (19.8%), followed by black/African Americans (13.1%), and Hispanics (12.9%). Those classified as “other” demonstrated prevalence of 14.02%. Table 1 demonstrates the baseline characteristics of the study population according to absence and presence of MAC. MAC was more prevalent in women and older participants.
Table 1.
Characteristics among CRIC participants stratified by the absence or presence of MAC.
| MAC = 0 | MAC > 0 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1739 (84) | 331 (16) | |
| Age* | 56.7±11.6 | 64.7±7.7 | <0.0001 |
| Men | 948 (54.5) | 164 (49.6) | 0.10 |
| Race | p = 0.0007 | ||
| White | 717 (41.2) | 177 (53.5) | |
| Black/African American | 633 (36.4) | 95 (28.7) | |
| Hispanic | 297 (17.1) | 44 (13.29) | |
| Other | 92 (5.3) | 15 (4.5) | |
| Smoking | p = 0.11 | ||
| Former | 678 (39.0) | 144 (43.5) | |
| Current | 183 (10.5) | 24 (7.3) | |
| Never | 878 (50.5) | 163 (49.2) | |
| BMI (kg/m2)* | 30.78±6.6 | 32.76±6.8 | <0.0001 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg)* | 125.6±20.8 | 131.7±22.2 | <0.0001 |
| Hypertension | 1481 (85.3) | 319 (96.67) | <0.0001 |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 761 (43.8) | 211 (63.75) | <0.0001 |
| Family history of CAD | 248 (14.3) | 57 (17.2) | 0.16 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl)* | 187.9±44.4 | 178.3±41.1 | 0.0005 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dl)* | 104.5±35.3 | 95.6±31.4 | <0.0001 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dl)* | 49.5±15.9 | 46.4±14.5 | 0.0016 |
| Lipid-lowering meds | 1010 (58.35) | 246 (74.77) | <0.0001 |
| hsCRP(mg/L)* | 4.4±6.9 | 5.7±13.8 | 0.31 |
| Estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)* | 44.2±20.3 | 37.5±12.8 | 0.07 |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 9.31±0.54 | 9.33±0.52 | 0.68 |
| Phosphate (mg/dL)* | 3.92±0.71 | 4.30±0.71 | 0.0021 |
| PTH (pg/mL) | 80.14±71.28 | 101.6±139.5 | 0.0081 |
| Use of vitamin D | 92 (5.31) | 24 (7.29) | 0.15 |
| Albumin excretion, ug/mg creatinine | 1885.6±2860.8 | 2671.8±2999.9 | 0.14 |
Numbers of patients are indicated for each group and numbers given in parentheses indicate relative percentages.
are given in mean±SD.
Participants with MAC had a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM) as well as higher average BMI (all p<0.001) when compared with participants who did not have MAC. They also had higher phosphate and PTH levels compared to participants without MAC (p <0.01, Table 1). There were no statistically significant differences in hsCRP levels or mean GFR between those with and without MAC. However, lipid lowering medications were used more in the MAC group. In addition, the MAC group tended to have lower total cholesterol, LDL, and HDL levels (p<0.002 for all).
Subsequently, when stratifying subjects by estimated GFR, progressively worsening GFR was associated with up to 4-fold increase in likelihood of MAC on univariate and multivariate analysis (Table 2).
Table 2.
Association of risk factors with presence of MAC using logistic regression in unadjusted and multivariate analyses when adjusting for age, gender, race, and estimated GFR
| Age and sex adjusted OR (95% CI) |
Adjusted^ OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| <55 | Ref group | Ref group |
| 55–64 | 3.95 (2.52–6.20)* | 4.01 (2.55–6.32)* |
| ≥65 | 9.37 (6.06–14.48)* | 8.05 (5.17–12.53)* |
| Female Gender | 1.19 (0.92–1.52) | 1.21 (0.94–1.56) |
| Race | ||
| Caucasian | Ref group | Ref group |
| African American | 0.60 (0.45–0.80)* | 0.53 (0.40–0.72)* |
| Hispanic | 0.71 (0.49–1.04) | 0.56 (0.38–0.82)* |
| Other | 0.73 (0.40–1.34) | 0.70 (0.37–1.29) |
| Estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)* | ||
| <30 | 3.21 (1.99–5.18)* | 3.78 (2.32–6.17)* |
| 30 to <40 | 2.90 (1.80–4.68)* | 3.26 (2.01–5.31)* |
| 40 to <50 | 2.10 (1.28–3.45)* | 2.30 (1.40–3.79)* |
| 50 to <60 | 1.41 (0.82–2.42) | 1.50 (0.87–2.59) |
| >= 60 | Ref group | Ref Group |
All variables adjusted simultaneously
Indicates statistically significant
Tables 2 through 4 demonstrate the univariate and multivariable adjusted association of risk factors with presence of MAC. Increasing age (per 10 year) was associated with up to an 8-fold increase in the odds of presence of MAC in unadjusted as well as multivariate adjusted analyses. Males had the same likelihood for MAC as females. As compared to whites, all ethnic groups had a lower odds ratio for presence of MAC, and the association was statistically significant for African American and Hispanic ethnicity after multivariate adjustment (Table 2). Among the traditional cardiac risk factors, elevated BMI, HTN, diabetes, and HDL levels <40 were not associated with increased odds of having MAC in unadjusted analysis (all p <0.05). Furthermore, after multivariable adjusted analysis all these associations remained not statistically significant. Interestingly, a former history of smoking was protective of MAC (p< 0.05, Table 3). When looking at calcium and related markers including levels of phosphate, PTH, and albuminuria, having elevated serum phosphate levels was associated with increased likelihood of MAC, with the association persisting after multivariate analysis (Table 4).
Table 4.
Association of Risk Factors with Presence of MAC using logistic regression in unadjusted and multivariate analyses when adjusting for phosphate, PTH, albuminuria, and calcium
| Age and sex adjusted OR (95% CI) |
Adjusted^ OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Phosphate (mg/dL) | ||
| 2.4–4.1 | Ref group | Ref group |
| >4.1 | 3.64 (1.52–8.70)* | 3.33 (1.37–8.09)* |
| PTH (pg/mL) | ||
| 11–55 | Ref group | Ref group |
| >55 | 2.33 (0.97–5.55) | 2.02 (0.83–4.91) |
| Albuminuria | ||
| <30 | Ref group | Ref group |
| 30 to <300 | 0.94 (0.20–4.34) | 0.50 (0.11–2.38) |
| >= 300 | 5.52 (1.77–17.25)* | 1.23 (0.39–3.87) |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | ||
| 8.6–10.2 | Ref group | Ref group |
| >10.2 | # | # |
All variables adjusted simultaneously
Indicates statistically significant
Unable to compute due to excess standard error in sample
Table 3.
Association of risk factors with presence of MAC using logistic regression in unadjusted and multivariate analyses when adjusting for cardiac risk factors
| Age and sex adjusted OR (95% CI) |
Adjusted^ OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Smoking | ||
| Never | Ref group | Ref group |
| Former | 0.47 (0.20–1.09) | 0.42 (0.19–0.95)* |
| Current | 0.32 (0.04–2.62) | 0.25 (0.03–2.03) |
| BMI | ||
| 18.5–24.99 (Normal) | Ref group | Ref group |
| 25–29.99 (Overweight) | 1.88 (0.39–9.16) | 1.87 (0.37–9.48) |
| 30–39.99 (Obese) | 2.09 (0.45–9.77) | 2.09 (0.41–10.51) |
| ≥40 (Morbidly obese) | 2.58 (0.43–15.50) | 2.13 (0.33–13.89) |
| Hypertension | 0.86 (0.23–3.24) | 0.90 (0.24–3.45) |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 2.21 (0.96–5.08) | 2.39 (0.95–5.99) |
| Family History of CAD | 1.16 (0.40–3.40) | 0.96 (0.32–2.94) |
| Lipid lowering meds | 1.18 (0.58–2.39) | 0.88 (0.39–2.04) |
| LDL (mg/dl) | ||
| <100 | Ref group | Ref group |
| 100–129 | 1.00 (0.46–2.18) | 0.99 (0.43–2.28) |
| 130–159 | 0.16 (0.02–1.28) | 0.14 (0.02–1.14) |
| ≥160 | 1.19 (0.35–4.01) | 0.79 (0.19–3.32) |
| HDL (mg/dl) | ||
| 40–59 (average risk of CAD) | Ref group | Ref group |
| <40 (higher risk of CAD) | 1.86 (0.89–3.89) | 1.73 (0.79–3.79) |
| >60 (lower risk of CAD) | 0.82 (0.21–3.20) | 0.98 (0.24–3.97) |
All variables adjusted simultaneously
Indicates statistically significant
Discussion
In brief, our study results show that there is an association between MAC and increasing age, white race, and elevated phosphorus in patients with CKD who are not dependent on dialysis and without kidney transplant. This is important due to the association of MAC with CAC and CAD [12].
We found several notable differences when compared to previous analyses from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohort, which had few CKD subjects (of 6785, 10% had eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2) [4]. Our study had nearly twice the prevalence of MAC than observed in MESA (16.0% vs. 9%, respectively) [3, 4]. Unlike MESA, we did not find an association with use of lipid lowering medications in MAC. Female and obese patients were more likely to have MAC, although neither reached statistical significance in CRIC, which is in contrast to observations in MESA. Increasing age was independently associated with higher odds of MAC in both studies and patients without MAC in the CRIC population were younger by about 8 years compared with those who had MAC. Conversely, in the Penn Diabetes Heart Study (PDHS) of subjects without renal dysfunction, MAC subjects were 10 years older on average than those without MAC [13]. Former smokers were associated with lower odds of MAC in the CRIC population, but MESA found a higher odds ratio. In our study, we found that this segment of former smokers had lower LDL levels than never-smokers (data not shown). In addition, unmeasured confounders such as lifestyle and environmental factors are plausible explanation of this interesting finding. Current smokers in the MESA population were independently associated with MAC [3]. Similar to findings from MESA, multivariable predictors of MAC in CRIC included older age, and white race, while neither study observed independent associations with MAC for hypertension, family history of heart attack, higher LDL level, lower HDL and higher CRP level [3, 4]. These are in agreement with a related study on the PDHS (Diabetics with creatinine ranging 0.7–1.0) population where age and Caucasian race were independently associated with MAC, while hypertension, hyperlipidemia, statin medication use, and increased CRP were not [13]. Unlike MESA and PDHS, we did not find female gender or diabetes independently associated with MAC. Other studies have not looked at calcium and related markers including levels of phosphate, PTH, and albuminuria in relation to MAC, but we found an elevated serum phosphate level to be independently associated with increased likelihood of MAC.
The difference between other studies and CRIC in MAC prevalence and age of onset is likely related to renal patient’s dysregulation of inflammation, hormones, and electrolytes [18]. Secondary hyperparathyroidism, stimulated by decreased active vitamin D and increased phosphorus excretion in CKD, is associated with increased circulating calcium and increased risk of calcification. Hyperphosphatemia, a hallmark of CKD, contributes by depositing in the tunica media or intimal layer and acts as mediator to activate genes leading to transformation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and pericytes to osteoblast-like cells. Calcium sensing receptors (Ca-SR) expression is decreased in uremic patients. Ca-SR suppresses PTH and is also present in endothelium, VSMC, and cardiomyocytes where they protect against calcification. Diets high in calcium and drugs designed to suppress Ca-SR have been shown to be cardioprotective [19]. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), upregulated in CKD earlier than PTH, has been shown to stimulate vascular calcification and be a strong and independent predictor of the extent of coronary stenosis and number of stenotic vessels [20, 21]. A related protein called Kothlo, which is downregulated early in CKD, is cardioprotective. In Kothlo knockout mice, there is increased phosphate transport into VSMC and increased transcription of factors that stimulate local osteoblastic transformation [22]. CKD patients also suffer from vitamin D deficiency, which stimulates vascular calcification and is associated with poor survival in ESRD and CKD [18]. Finally, inflammation is known to accelerate atherosclerosis and vascular calcification. CKD patients show upregulation of pro-inflammatory markers IL-1, IL-6, TNFα while decreased levels of anti-inflammatory proteins such as fetuin A, which prevents precipitation of calcium and phosphate in serum and whose concentration is inversely related to survival [23]. Fortunately, calcific progression, whether by these processes or others, is attenuated after kidney transplantation [24]. In CRIC, MAC subjects tended to have a lower GFR than those without MAC although this difference was not statistically significant (MAC 44.2±20.3 v. 37.5±12.8; p=0.0706); similar results were found even after excluding diabetics. The finding of association between elevated phosphorus level and MAC supports the above mechanism. The lack of association with an elevated calcium level is consistent with the standard of care to maintain normal calcium intake. It is possible that no relation was found between MAC and PTH due to the well-managed calcium levels (MAC = 0, 9.31±0.54; MAC > 0, 9.33±0.52).
Multiple other risk factors have been associated with MAC in the general population. However, in a population that entirely suffers from CKD, these may not play a significant role. CKD patients suffer from decreased clearance of phosphorus, which is directly toxic to the tissues exposed to the bloodstream. Mechanisms related to other risk factors, such as obesity and body mass index (BMI), low HDL <40, diabetes mellitus, and female gender, may be too far upstream or insufficient in severity. These include inflammatory markers (IL-1, IL-6, TNFα or adipocytokines specific to fatty tissue) [18]; the nuclear factor kβ ligand (RANKL) - receptor activator and nuclear factor kβ (RANK) - osteoprotegerin (OPG) signaling pathway [25–27] inducing osteoclastogenesis [28–34]; cholesterol reducing and anti-inflammatory benefits of HDL [35, 36]. Also, we know that the benefits of lipid lowering medications decrease with advancing kidney disease [37].
Our study had several strengths. First, CRIC is one of the largest prospective cohorts of adults with a range of CKD severity that is likely generalizable to most patients with CKD. Second, there was systematic collection of clinical and biomarker candidate predictor data. Additionally, the use of CT scanners to assess MAC diminishes false positive studies as compared to echocardiography. Our study also had several limitations. The absolute number of patients with MAC was modest—even though prevalence was higher than in other studies—and this limited our precision and ability to examine subgroups rigorously. Additionally, it is difficult to prove causation in cross-sectional studies.
This study is clinically relevant because it identifies the risk factors for MAC in patients with CKD who are not dependent on dialysis and without renal transplant. We identify several targets (signaling and inflammatory factors) for future research that have the potential to modify treatment and prevention of MAC. Additionally, if our results are validated, the presence of these risk factors could potentially prompt earlier diagnostic investigations or modification of lifestyle or medicines. It is also possible that earlier screening could discover associated conditions such as CAC prior to symptom onset. Future longitudinal studies are needed to validate these claims.
Risk factors for mitral annular calcification (MAC) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) demonstrate significant overlap in the general population.
The aim of this paper is to determine whether there are independent relationships between MAC and demographics, traditional and novel CVD risk factors using cardiac CT in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) in a cross-sectional study.
Our study consisted of 2070 subjects, of which 331 had MAC (prevalence of 16.0%).
Acknowledgments
Funding for the CRIC Study was obtained under a cooperative agreement from National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK060990, U01DK060984, U01DK061022, U01DK061021, U01DK061028, U01DK060980, U01DK060963, and U01DK060902). In addition, this work was supported in part by: the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania Clinical and Translational Science Award NIH/NCATS UL1TR000003, Johns Hopkins University UL1 TR-000424, University of Maryland GCRC M01 RR-16500, Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland, UL1TR000439 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) component of the National Institutes of Health and NIH roadmap for Medical Research, Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR) V 2014.07.28 UL1TR000433, University of Illinois at Chicago CTSA UL1RR029879, Tulane University Translational Research in Hypertension and Renal Biology P30GM103337, Kaiser Permanente NIH/NCRR UCSF-CTSI UL1 RR-024131.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Adler Y, Fisman EZ, Shemesh J, Tanne D, Hovav B, Motro M, Schwammenthal E, Tenenbaum A. Usefulness of helical computed tomography in detection of mitral annular calcification as a marker of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2005;101:371–376. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Budoff MJ, Katz R, Wong ND, Nasir K, Mao SS, Takasu J, Kronmal R, Detrano RC, Shavelle DM, Blumenthal RS, O'brien KD, Carr JJ. Effect of scanner type on the reproducibility of extracoronary measures of calcification: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:1043–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kanjanauthai S, Nasir K, Katz R, Rivera JJ, Takasu J, Blumenthal RS, Eng J, Budoff MJ. Relationships of mitral annular calcification to cardiovascular risk factors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Atherosclerosis. 2010;213:558–562. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.08.072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ix JH, Shlipak MG, Katz R, Budoff MJ, Shavelle DM, Probstfield JL, Takasu J, Detrano R, O'Brien KD. Kidney function and aortic valve and mitral annular calcification in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50:412–420. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296–1305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fox CS, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Guo CY, Parise H, Levy D, Leip EP, O'donnell CJ, D'Agostino RB, Sr, Benjamin EJ. Cross-sectional association of kidney function with valvular and annular calcification: the Framingham heart study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:521–527. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005060627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goodman WG, Goldin J, Kuizon BD, Yoon C, Gales B, Sider D, Wang Y, Chung J, Emerick A, Greaser L, Elashoff RM, Salusky IB. Coronary-artery calcification in young adults with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1478–1483. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oh J, Wunsch R, Turzer M, Bahner M, Raggi P, Querfeld U, Mehls O, Schaefer F. Advanced coronary and carotid arteriopathy in young adults with childhood-onset chronic renal failure. Circulation. 2002;106:100–105. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000020222.63035.c0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Adeney KL, Siscovick DS, Ix JH, Seliger SL, Shlipak MG, Jenny NS, Kestenbaum BR. Association of serum phosphate with vascular and valvular calcification in moderate CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:381–387. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008040349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chung AW, Yang HH, Kim JM, Sigrist MK, Chum E, Gourlay WA, Levin A. Upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in the arterial vasculature contributes to stiffening and vasomotor dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease. Circulation. 2009;120:792–801. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.862565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kestenbaum BR, Adeney KL, de Boer IH, Ix JH, Shlipak MG, Siscovick DS. Incidence and progression of coronary calcification in chronic kidney disease: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Kidney Int. 2009;76:991–998. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tenenbaum A, Shemesh J, Fisman EZ, Motro M. Advanced mitral annular calcification is associated with severe coronary calcification on fast dual spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:193–198. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200003000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Qasim AN, Rafeek H, Rasania SP, Churchill TW, Yang W, Ferrari VA, Jha S, Master SM, Mulvey CK, Terembula K, Dailing C, Budoff MJ, Kawut SM, Reilly MP. Cardiovascular risk factors and mitral annular calcification in type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2013;226:419–424. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Feldman HI, Appel LJ, Chertow GM, Cifelli D, Cizman B, Daugirdas J, Fink JC, Franklin-Becker ED, Go AS, Hamm LL, He J, Hostetter T, Hsu CY, Jamerson K, Joffe M, Kusek JW, Landis JR, Lash JP, Miller ER, Mohler ER, 3rd, Muntner P, Ojo AO, Rahman M, Townsend RR, Wright JT Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study Investigators. The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study: Design and Methods. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:S148–S153. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000070149.78399.ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Budoff MJ, Rader DJ, Reilly MP, Mohler ER, 3rd, Lash J, Yang W, Rosen L, Glenn M, Teal V, Feldman HI CRIC Study Investigators. Relationship of estimated GFR and coronary artery calcification in the CRIC (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;58:519–526. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mao SS, Pal RS, McKay CR, Gao YG, Gopal A, Ahmadi N, Child J, Carson S, Takasu J, Sarlak B, Bechmann D, Budoff MJ. Comparison of coronary artery calcium scores between electron beam computed tomography and 64-multidetector computed tomographic scanner. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:175–178. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31817579ee. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Carr JJ, Nelson JC, Wong ND, McNitt-Gray M, Arad Y, Jacobs DR, Jr, Sidney S, Bild DE, Williams OD, Detrano RC. Calcified coronary artery plaque measurement with cardiac CT in population-based studies: standardized protocol of Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Radiology. 2005;234:35–43. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2341040439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stompór T. Coronary artery calcification in chronic kidney disease: An update. World J Cardiol. 2014;6(4):115–129. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i4.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Smajilovic S, Yano S, Jabbari R, Tfelt-Hansen J. The calcium-sensing receptor and calcimimetics in blood pressure modulation. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:884–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01317.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Heine GH, Seiler S, Fliser D. FGF-23: the rise of a novel cardiovascular risk marker in CKD. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:3072–3081. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xiao Y, Peng C, Huang W, Zhang J, Xia M, Zhang Y, Ling W. Circulating fibroblast growth factor 23 is associated with angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hu MC, Shi M, Zhang J, Quiñones H, Griffith C, Kuro-o M, Moe OW. Klotho deficiency causes vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:124–136. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009121311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Eraso LH, Ginwala N, Qasim AN, Mehta NN, Dlugash R, Kapoor S, Schwartz S, Schutta M, Iqbal N, Mohler ER, 3rd, Reilly MP. Association of lower plasma fetuin-a levels with peripheral arterial disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:408–410. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stompór T, Pasowicz M, Sulowicz W, Dembinska-Kiec A, Tracz W. Trends in coronary artery calcification in peritoneal dialysis and transplant patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:3205–3206. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh522. author reply 3206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ndip A, Wilkinson FL, Jude EB, Boulton AJ, Alexander MY. RANKL-OPG and RAGE modulation in vascular calcification and diabetes: novel targets for therapy. Diabetologia. 2014;57:2251–2260. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3348-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rasmussen LM, Tarnow L, Hansen TK, Parving HH, Flyvbjerg A. Plasma osteoprotegerin levels are associated with glycaemic status, systolic blood pressure, kidney function and cardiovascular morbidity in type 1 diabetic patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154:75–81. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Farrag A, Bakhoum S, Salem MA, El-Faramawy A, Gergis E. The association between extracoronary calcification and coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Heart Vessels. 2013;28:12–18. doi: 10.1007/s00380-011-0205-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Robinson LJ, Yaroslavskiy BB, Griswold RD, Zadorozny EV, Guo L, Tourkova IL, Blair HC. Estrogen inhibits RANKL-stimulated osteoclastic differentiation of human monocytes through estrogen and RANKL-regulated interaction of estrogen receptor-alpha with BCAR1 and Traf6. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:1287–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Oursler MJ, Osdoby P, Pyfferoen J, Riggs BL, Spelsberg TC. Avian osteoclasts as estrogen target cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:6613–6617. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kousteni S, Bellido T, Plotkin LI, O'Brien CA, Bodenner DL, Han L, Han K, DiGregorio GB, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS, Roberson PK, Weinstein RS, Jilka RL, Manolagas SC. Nongenotropic, sex-nonspecific signaling through the estrogen or androgen receptors: dissociation from transcriptional activity. Cell. 2001;104:719–730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Breuil V, Ticchioni M, Testa J, Roux CH, Ferrari P, Breittmayer JP, Albert-Sabonnadière C, Durant J, De Perreti F, Bernard A, Euller-Ziegler L, Carle GF. Immune changes in post-menopausal osteoporosis: the Immunos study. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:805–814. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1018-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hofbauer LC, Khosla S, Dunstan CR, Lacey DL, Spelsberg TC, Riggs BL. Estrogen stimulates gene expression and protein production of osteoprotegerin in human osteoblastic cells. Endocrinology. 1999;140:4367–4370. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.9.7131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Eghbali-Fatourechi G, Khosla S, Sanyal A, Boyle WJ, Lacey DL, Riggs BL. Role of RANK ligand in mediating increased bone resorption in early postmenopausal women. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1221–1230. doi: 10.1172/JCI17215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Srivastava S, Toraldo G, Weitzmann MN, Cenci S, Ross FP, Pacifici R. Estrogen decreases osteoclast formation by down-regulating receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-induced JNK activation. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:8836–8840. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010764200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Soran H, Hama S, Yadav R, Durrington PN. HDL functionality. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2012;23:353–366. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e328355ca25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang X, Rader DJ. Molecular regulation of macrophage reverse cholesterol transport. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007;22:368–372. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3281ec5113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kon V, Ikizler TA, Fazio S. Importance of high-density lipoprotein quality: evidence from chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013;22:259–265. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32835fe47f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
