Skip to main content
Biology of Reproduction logoLink to Biology of Reproduction
. 2011 Jan 5;84(5):851–858. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.087452

The Blood-Testis and Blood-Epididymis Barriers Are More than Just Their Tight Junctions1

Payal Mital 3, Barry T Hinton 4, Jannette M Dufour 3,2
PMCID: PMC4574632  PMID: 21209417

Abstract

The terms blood-testis barrier (BTB) or blood-epididymis barrier (BEB), are often described as Sertoli cell-Sertoli cell tight junctions (TJs) or TJs between the epithelial cells in the epididymis, respectively. However, in reality, the BTB and BEB are much more complex than just the TJ. The focus of this minireview is to remind readers that the complete BTB and BEB are comprised of three components: anatomical, physiological, and immunological. The TJs form the anatomical (physical) barrier that restricts passage of molecules and cells from entering or exiting the lumen. The physiological barrier is comprised of transporters that regulate movement of substances in or out of the lumen, thus creating a microenvironment, which is critical for the proper development and maturation of germ cells. The immunological barrier limits access by the immune system and sequesters the majority of the autoantigenic germ cells. Combined with the overall immune-privilege of the testis, this suppresses detrimental immune responses against the autoantigenic germ cells. These three components on their own do not create a complete functional barrier; instead, it is the interaction between all three components that create a barrier of maximal competence.

Keywords: anatomical (physical) barrier, blood barrier, epididymis, immunological barrier, physiological barrier, Sertoli cells, testis


The fully functional blood-testis and -epididymis barriers are comprised of anatomical, physiological, and immunological barriers that act together to create barriers of maximal competence.

INTRODUCTION

When one thinks about either the blood-testis barrier (BTB) or the blood-epididymis barrier (BEB), an image of their tight junctions probably immediately comes to mind. In this Minireview, we clarify that the barriers in both the testis and epididymis are more complex and are not comprised only of epithelial cell tight junctions (the physical or anatomical barrier), but also include physiological and immunological barriers. It is really the complex interaction between all three of these barriers that constitute the functional BTB and BEB.

Like other blood-tissue barriers, the BTB and BEB are not impenetrable walls, but are rather restrictive in nature; that is, they restrict or control the entry of molecules or even cells present in circulating blood/interstitium from entering a tissue or compartment. For the testis and epididymis, this barrier is between the blood vessels and the luminal compartment of the seminiferous tubules or the epididymal lumen, respectively. In contrast to the brain, where the blood-brain barrier is located at the endothelial tight junctions lining the blood vessels [1, 2], in the testis and epididymis, the primary physical component of the BTB and BEB is the tight junctions formed between adjacent epithelial cells lining the seminiferous tubules (Sertoli cells) [35] or epididymal duct [68]. While this physical barrier (i.e., tight junctions between epithelial cells) is very important for the functions of the BTB and BEB, the common misconception is that this physical barrier is the sole component of the BTB and BEB. However, the fully functional BTB and BEB are much more complex, and consist of anatomical/physical (tight junctions, basolateral and apical membranes), physiological (transporters, channels at the basolateral and apical membranes, and the paracellular route) and immunological (inside and outside the tubule/duct) components, which are all necessary to make up the functioning barrier in the testis and epididymis. It is how these three barriers interact that is the key.

The primary function of the BTB and BEB is to create the appropriate microenvironment to control germ cell development (mitosis, meiosis, and differentiation) and maturation, to sequester autoantigenic germ cells to prevent harmful autoimmune responses, and to shield germ cells from cytotoxic molecules [9]. Therefore, besides a physical barrier, it is also necessary to have a physiological component to control entry and exit of molecules, and an immunological component to protect the germ cells. This review is not meant to be a comprehensive description of all the individual components of each part of the BTB and BEB, which are reviewed individually in detail elsewhere [1015], but instead to emphasize the point that all three components are important for complete BTB and BEB function. Here, we describe the three components of the BTB and BEB, with specific emphasis on the importance of the physiological and immunological components.

BASIC ANATOMY OF THE TESTIS AND EPIDIDYMIS

The testis consists of two compartments: the highly convoluted seminiferous tubules, and the interstitial space [16]. The interstitium includes Leydig cells, blood vessels, macrophages, lymphocytes, connective tissue, and lymphatic vessels [17]. The Leydig cells within the interstitial space produce testosterone, which is important to maintain spermatogenesis [18, 19] and the male secondary sex characteristics [20]. The seminiferous epithelium is the site of spermatogenesis and includes the Sertoli cells and germ cells [16]. This seminiferous epithelium is surrounded by one or more layers (depending on the species) of peritubular myoid cells [21]. The Sertoli cells extend from the basement membrane to the lumen surrounding the germ cells, and are responsible for providing structural and functional support to the developing germ cells [22]. Adjacent Sertoli cells are connected by tight junctions, which are located in the basal third of the seminiferous epithelium [3, 4, 23, 24]. The junctions separate the epithelium into an adluminal and basal compartment, thereby separating the germ cells located in the adluminal compartment from the blood supply [3, 4, 2327]. This allows the Sertoli cells to control the microenvironment within the seminiferous tubules.

The epididymis is a highly convoluted duct/tube and, for most species, can be divided into distinct anatomical regions: initial segment, caput, corpus, and cauda [28]. The interstitial component that surrounds the duct contains blood vessels, connective tissue septa that divide the duct into smaller segments, lymphatic vessels, macrophages, and lymphocytes [29]. The epididymal epithelium comprises several cell types, including principal, basal, narrow, apical, halo, and clear cells surrounded by multiple layers of peritubular myoid cells [25, 30]. From a functional perspective, the epididymis plays several important roles including sperm maturation, sperm transport, sperm storage, and sperm protection [2932]. Similar to the BTB, the BEB is important in regulating the microenvironment within the duct to allow for sperm maturation and to sequester autoantigenic spermatozoa from the immune system.

In the next three sections, the three principal components of the BTB and BEB are discussed and include: anatomical (physical), physiological (permeability), and immunological barriers.

ANATOMICAL (PHYSICAL) BARRIER

One function of the BTB/BEB, which is carried out by the anatomical barrier, is to restrict entry of molecules into the adluminal compartment of the testis or the lumen of the epididymis. In the testis and the epididymis the major anatomical component of the BTB and the BEB is the tight junction complexes formed between Sertoli cells (Sertoli cell-Sertoli cell tight junctions) [33] or epithelial cells of the epididymis, respectively (Fig. 1, A and B). For the testis, substances within the circulation flow past the endothelial cells lining the blood vessels through the interstitial space to the myoid cells and Sertoli cells before reaching the lumen of the seminiferous tubules [21]. While there are several similarities between the endothelial cells of the testis and brain, in contrast to the brain, where the anatomical blood-brain barrier is located at the endothelial cell junctions [1, 2], in the testis, several studies provide evidence for a high degree of permeability of the testicular blood vessels [25, 3436]. In rodents, but not larger mammals, the peritubular myoid cells create a semipermeable barrier excluding the entry of large molecules, such as carbon particles and limiting the entrance of smaller molecules (e.g., lanthanum) in ∼85–90% of tubules [3, 4, 37]. In all species, tight junctions formed between adjacent Sertoli cells [38], almost completely prevent entrance of molecules (e.g., lanthanum) from entering the lumen of the seminiferous tubules [3, 4, 21, 23, 24, 39]. These Sertoli cell-Sertoli cell tight junctions (zonula occludens) are similar to other tight junctions in that they are composed of occludins, claudins, and junctional adhesion molecules [10, 4042]. However, they are quite unique compared to other epithelial tight junctions in that they are located basally rather than apically [21].

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

The anatomical and physiological barrier. Anatomical barrier. Substances within the circulation enter the interstitial space, but most of them (dots) are prevented from entering the adluminal compartment (thin line) of the testis (A) and the lumen of the epididymis (B) by the anatomical component (tight junctions) of the BTB/BEB. In the testis (A), the adluminal compartment (thin line) of the seminiferous epithelium is separated from the basal compartment (thick line) by the tight junctions. The basal membrane, along with the apical membrane and tight junctions, is what forms the Sertoli cell barrier, which is the complete anatomical barrier. In the epididymis (B), the lumen is separated from the epididymal epithelium by tight junctions between adjacent epithelial cells. Physiological barrier. At the adluminal (thin line) and basal (thick line) membranes are the sites of specific transporters that control the movement of molecules (dots and stars) between the compartments, creating unique microenvironments for germ cell development and maturation in the testis (A). In the epididymis (B) these transporters also create a unique microenvironment along the length of the epididymal duct through variation in the gradient of molecules being exported (dots and stars in the lumen). AM, apical membrane; B, blood vessel; BM, basal membrane; E, epididymal epithelial cell; GC, germ cell; L, Leydig cell; M, myoid cell; S, Sertoli cell; TJ, tight junction.

In an attempt to more precisely describe the BTB, Russell and Peterson [33], used the term the “Sertoli cell barrier.” This term more adequately defined the barrier location at the seminiferous epithelium instead of, as the name BTB implies, at the blood vessels. This description also took into account that the barrier does not have direction, and was a permeability barrier, which we have identified as being the “physiological” barrier. They recognized that it was both the occludin junctions, together with the body of the Sertoli cell, that ultimately formed the Sertoli cell (SC) barrier and acted to restrict the passage of molecules into and out of the seminiferous tubule lumen. Furthermore, they specifically referred to the tight junctions of the BTB as the Sertoli cell-Sertoli cell junctions, which we believe is a more accurate description of the anatomical component of the BTB.

Similarly to the BTB, the anatomical site of the BEB has been considered to be the tight junctional complex between the epididymal epithelial cells. Friend and Gilula [43] wrote, “Among the various epithelial cell contacts examined, the zonula occludens of the epididymis is the most highly developed.” This has been confirmed by several freeze-fracture and ultrastructural studies that show an extensive tight junction meshwork [4446]. Also similar to the junctions between Sertoli cells, the junctional complexes between epididymal epithelial cells contain many proteins, including claudins, connexins, and catenins [4750]. Lanthanum and horseradish peroxidase have been used to probe the integrity of the anatomical BEB, and similarly to the BTB, these tracers do not penetrate the tight junctions between the epididymal epithelial cells [6, 46].

Therefore, the components that make up the anatomical barrier in both the testis and epididymis are the basolateral membrane, the apical membrane, and the tight junctional complex between the cells (Fig. 1, A and B). Each will contribute in their unique way to restrict the passage of molecules from entering and exiting the lumen and allowing each tissue to form a very unique luminal fluid milieu. The permeability properties of the basolateral and apical membranes are being considered here as the physiological barrier, but we recognize that their physical structure alone will restrict many substances from entering and exiting the seminiferous tubular and epididymal lumen.

PHYSIOLOGICAL (PERMEABILITY) BARRIER

While the anatomical barrier restricts passage of molecules into the lumen, specific transporters located along the basolateral and apical membranes of the Sertoli cells and epididymal epithelial cells regulate the movement of molecules in or out of the lumen [11]. This physiological barrier is required to create the appropriate microenvironment within the seminiferous epithelium and lumen for development (meiosis and differentiation) and maturation of the germ cells. The whole idea of a physiological barrier within the testis probably originated with the paper by Setchell et al. in 1969 [51], although it was well known before that time that vascular perfused dyes were excluded from the seminiferous tubular lumen. The experiments were performed to examine the permeability of the testis to molecules of differing molecular weight. Radioactive substances were injected into blood, rete testis fluid was collected, and the amount of radioactivity collected was compared to that injected into blood. From this study, the authors stated, “It is suggested that this permeability barrier will regulate the access to the seminiferous epithelium of some constituents of blood plasma, isolate the germinal cells immunologically and help to maintain the concentration differences between rete testis and lymph or blood plasma” [51]. The following year, Dym and Fawcett [3] published their paper showing that lanthanum nitrate failed to penetrate the tight junctions between the Sertoli cells, thereby linking the permeability barrier described by Setchell et al. [51] with an anatomical barrier [3, 51]. Unfortunately, although the tight junctions do, indeed, prevent many molecules from entering the lumen of the seminiferous tubule, the contribution of the basolateral and apical membranes with specific transporters has not been recognized as a major contributor to the restrictive movement of substances from blood to lumen. Therefore, the physiological barrier reflects primarily the permeability of the basolateral and apical membranes to molecules (Fig. 1, A and B). This permeability depends upon the presence and specificity of a number of transporters/carriers. Molecules are needed for proper cellular function (basolateral membrane permeability) and for developing germ cells and maturing spermatozoa (apical membrane permeability) in the testis and epididymis, respectively. Note that the flow of molecules is not one way, from blood to cell to lumen, but also from lumen to cell to blood, making the permeability properties of the apical and basolateral membranes quite complex and not trivial.

One minor criticism from these earlier BTB physiological experiments was that the measurements were of the permeability of the seminiferous tubule and rete testis rather than the seminiferous tubule alone. To this end, micropuncture experiments, in which fluid was removed directly from the seminiferous tubule, confirmed that, indeed, there was a permeability barrier across the seminiferous tubule [5, 52, 53]. Similar experiments were performed demonstrating the permeability characteristics of the epididymal epithelium [5457]. Further studies showed clearly that many ions, organic solutes, and peptides are transported into and out of the testis [21, 54, 5864] and the epididymal epithelium via specific transporters [6573]. These carriers were also quite specific for their substrates, only allowing the required molecules to enter the Sertoli and epididymal cell, and then presumably, for some molecules, to cross the apical membrane and enter into the lumen (Fig. 1, A and B).

Another key point that should be made is that the physiological barrier in both the testis and epididymis is highly dynamic; that is, it is constantly changing. It is well known that the Sertoli cell itself is highly dynamic [22, 74], changing its three-dimensional structure during the course of spermatogenesis and spermiogenesis. As the Sertoli cell changes, the physiological barrier also changes to meet the needs (e.g., nutritional) of the germ cells and the Sertoli cells. However, although the tight junctions are also dynamic in the sense that they undergo remodeling (opening and closing), it would appear that they remain static regarding their function; that is, no matter at which stage of the cycle, the integrity of the junctions remain intact. Likewise, for the physiological barrier in the epididymis; the tight junctions remain intact, yet the physiological barrier changes from one region to the next. This is reflected in the ever-changing luminal fluid composition along the duct (Fig. 1B); one can imagine that, even from cell to cell from initial segment to cauda, the physiological barrier changes! It is extraordinary to realize that all these events are highly coordinated, and the mechanism(s) by which this coordination is achieved is not known.

IMMUNOLOGICAL BARRIER

Immunological Barrier in Testis

The term immune-privilege is often used synonymously with BTB. In fact, it is often stated that immune-privilege in the testis is because of the BTB. However, immune-privilege in the testis is more complex, and the whole testis, not just the adluminal compartment, is immune-privileged. The immunoprotective ability of the space outside of the BTB was demonstrated by several studies in which allogeneic or xenogeneic tissues, such as fragments of skin, pancreas, or parathyroid, transplanted into the testis interstitium survived for an extended duration of time [7577]. For instance, transplantation of allogeneic or xenogeneic pancreatic islets within the interstitial space of the testis not only resulted in prolonged graft survival compared to non-immune-privileged sites, kidney, and liver, but also normalized blood glucose levels in diabetic rodents and Rhesus monkeys [77, 78].

If the whole testis is immunologically privileged, what role, if any, does the BTB play in testicular immune-privilege and creating an immunological barrier to protect autoantigenic germ cells? It has been proposed that the BTB acts as an immunological barrier by sequestering germ cell antigens and preventing entry of leukocytes and antibodies into the adluminal or luminal compartments of the testis. This is partially true in that antibodies and immune cell entry is hindered by the SC barrier under normal conditions (Fig. 2A) [7983]. However, in the testis, although most of the autoantigenic germ cells are sequestered behind the SC barrier, preleptotene spermatocytes and spermatogonia are located within the basal compartment of the seminiferous epithelium, and express antigens that can evoke an immune response (Fig. 2A) [84]. Moreover, there is recent evidence that germ cell-specific antigens expressed only by germ cells in the adluminal compartment, such as LDHc4 (testis-specific isoform of lactate dehydrogenase) [85], can be transferred across the SC barrier and detected in immune complexes within the interstitium of the testis (Fig. 2A) [86]. It is thought that this allows for the induction of immunologic tolerance to these germ cell autoantigens [86]. Therefore, as stated by Tung, “The idea of complete sequestration of testis autoantigens as the pre-eminent basis of immunologic unresponsiveness no longer holds” [87]. Instead, testicular immune-privilege also involves local production of anti-inflammatory cytokines and immunosuppressive factors by cells within the testis, such as Sertoli cells, Leydig cells, testicular macrophages, and regulatory T cells, which control the immune response [12, 13]. The importance of Sertoli cells in creating an immune-privileged environment has been demonstrated by transplantation experiments where Sertoli cells placed in ectopic sites were able to survive and protect cografted allogeneic and xenogeneic cells [88]. This protection is likely due to the expression of immunoregulatory factors, as the protected cotransplanted cells were located in the vicinity of, but not surrounded by, the Sertoli cells at the graft site [8890].

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

The immunological barrier. The immunological component prevents entry of immunoglobulins (Y) and immune cells (macrophages and T cells). In the testis (A), autoantigenic germ cells reside in the basal and adluminal compartments. Germ cell autoantigens are also present within Sertoli cells and are transported by Sertoli cells to the interstitial compartment, where they are located outside the seminiferous tubules (dots). In addition, secreted immunomodulatory factors within the interstitial space control immune responses. Restriction of movement of antibodies and immune cells across the Sertoli cell barrier, together with the controlled presentation of antigens, and secretion of immunomodulatory factors creates a unique immune-privileged site in the testis. In the epididymis (B), tight junctions of the epididymal epithelium form the major component of the immunological barrier. Autoantigenic germ cells are present in the lumen, immunoglobulins can cross the epithelial cells, and immune cells have also been observed within the epithelium adjacent to epithelial cells. B, blood vessel; E, epididymal epithelial cell; GC, germ cell; L, Leydig cell; M, myoid cell; MΦ, macrophage; S, Sertoli cell; T, T cell; TJ, tight junction.

The involvement of immunomodulatory factors and other immunoregulatory mechanisms in forming a functional immunological barrier is further supported by experiments where the permeability of the SC barrier was altered in mice by knockout of the tight junction protein, claudin 11, or treatment with a mutant occludin peptide [91, 92]. Even though the barrier was permeable to bovine serum albumin or inulin, an autoimmune reaction was not generated, as testicular autoantibodies were not detected in serum or within the adluminal compartment, and no CD4 T cell infiltrate was detected in the testis [91, 92], indicating that there is more to testicular immune-privilege than just the anatomical barrier. However, since the germ cells were lost after disruption of the barrier in these mice, possibly before an immune response could be generated, further studies need to be designed to specifically address the importance of the tight junctions before concluding that the SC barrier does not play a role in immune-privilege. In contrast to immune protection in the testis, even when the BTB is intact, autoimmune orchitis can develop, leading to destruction of the developing germ cells. In addition, survival of the tissue transplanted into the interstitium and cografted with Sertoli cells is highly variable and can be rejected, suggesting that a delicate balance of immune regulation exists in the testis [7578, 89].

Overall, the immunological component of the BTB is an important part of testicular immune-privilege. By preventing antibodies and immune cells from entering into the tubule, sequestering the majority of the autoantigens and allowing for controlled antigen exposure/presentation, this could decrease the immune response to the germ cells (Fig. 2A). Combined with the other immunomodulatory properties of the testis, this leads to creation of an effective immune-privileged environment throughout the testis that, under normal circumstances, protects the autoantigenic germ cells from immunological destruction.

Immunological Barrier in Epididymis

The function of the immunological barrier in the epididymis is to protect the sperm from attack by the immune system. Primarily, this function is carried out by the BEB, which sequesters sperm antigens and restricts entry of immunoglobulins and immune cells (Fig. 2B). The BEB prevents sperm antigens from escaping the duct and contacting immune cells, thus preventing induction of an autoimmune reaction [14]. Under normal conditions, monocyte-macrophages, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells, which are located throughout the epididymal epithelium and interstitial space (Fig. 2B) [81, 93], are not detected within the epididymal lumen [81]. Typically, immunoglobulins do not cross the BEB [81, 94, 95], and, although less than 2% of serum IgG levels are detected within the lumen of the cauda epididymis under normal circumstances [96], this can be accounted for by leakiness of the rete testis [96].

While several immunoregulatory factors are expressed in the epididymis [15], there is little direct evidence to support that the whole epididymis is immune-privileged. Only one study has examined the survival of allografts after transplantation into the interstitial space of the epididymis [97]. In this study, allogeneic parathyroid tissue was transplanted into the epididymis, and a slight prolonged survival (21 ± 6.22 days) of the grafts was observed only when the spleen was removed before transplantation and the lymphatic drainage bypassed the regional lymph nodes. In the case of intact spleen, grafts were rejected, with mean graft survival of 7.57 ± 0.9 or 12 ± 2.68 days if the lymphatics drained directly to the regional lymph nodes or bypassed the regional lymph nodes, respectively. This graft survival time was much shorter than the survival of allografts transplanted into the testis [7578, 88], indicating that immune protection in the interstitium of the epididymis is limited.

In response to injection of spermatozoa or testicular germ cells into the epididymal interstitial space, spermatic granulomas were formed [98]. Moreover, intravenous injection of Bordetella pertussigens induced an inflammatory reaction and infiltration of leukocytes within the epididymal interstitium [99]. Despite the increase in inflammatory cells within the interstitium, the epididymal tubules were not damaged, indicating that the tight junctions provided a sufficient immunological barrier [99]. In contrast, when similar studies were performed (injection of spermatozoa, testicular germ cells, or Bordetella pertussigens) in the testis, no infiltrate was detected and spermatic granulomas were not formed in the interstitial space [98, 99].

Together, this supports the importance of the tight junctions in the epididymis in forming an effective immunological barrier, and indicates that, while the immunological barrier in the testis includes the interstitial space, this may not be the case for the epididymis.

CONCLUSION

The BTB and BEB consist of three components: anatomical, physiological, and immunological. Each of these components, not just the Sertoli cell-Sertoli cell junctions or epithelial tight junctions of the epididymis, contributes to form the BTB and BEB of maximum competence. Together, they create a unique, anatomical, physiological, and immunological microenvironment, which is responsible for proper development of the germ cells into fully functional sperm.

Supplementary Material

Author Biosketches

Footnotes

1

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grants HD067400 to J.M.D. and HD052035 to B.T.H.

REFERENCES

  1. Reese TS, Karnovsky MJ. Fine structural localization of a blood-brain barrier to exogenous peroxidase. J Cell Biol 1967; 34: 207 217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brightman MW, Reese TS. Junctions between intimately apposed cell membranes in the vertebrate brain. J Cell Biol 1969; 40: 648 677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dym M, Fawcett DW. The blood-testis barrier in the rat and the physiological compartmentation of the seminiferous epithelium. Biol Reprod 1970; 3: 308 326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fawcett DW, Leak LV, Heidger PM., Jr Electron microscopic observations on the structural components of the blood-testis barrier. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1970; 10: 105 122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Howards SS, Jessee SJ, Johnson AL. Micropuncture studies of the blood-seminiferous tubule barrier. Biol Reprod 1976; 14: 264 269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hoffer AP, Hinton BT. Morphological evidence for a blood-epididymis barrier and the effects of gossypol on its integrity. Biol Reprod 1984; 30: 991 1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Agarwal A, Hoffer AP. Ultrastructural studies on the development of the blood-epididymis barrier in immature rats. J Androl 1989; 10: 425 431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cambrosio Mann M, Friess AE, Stoffel MH. Blood-tissue barriers in the male reproductive tract of the dog: a morphological study using lanthanum nitrate as an electron-opaque tracer. Cells Tissues Organs 2003; 174: 162 169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Setchell BP. The functional significance of the blood-testis barrier. J Androl 1980; 1: 3 10. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Tight junctions in the testis: new perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2010; 365: 1621 1635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Setchell BP. Blood-testis barrier, junctional and transport proteins and spermatogenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol 2008; 636: 212 233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fijak M, Meinhardt A. The testis in immune privilege. Immunol Rev 2006; 213: 66 81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meinhardt A, Hedger MP. Immunological, paracrine and endocrine aspects of testicular immune privilege. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2010; (in press). published online ahead of print 2 April 2010; DOI 10.1016/j.mce.2010.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Beagley KW, Wu ZL, Pomering M, Jones RC. Immune responses in the epididymis: implications for immunocontraception. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1998; 53: 235 245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pollanen P, Cooper TG. Immunology of the testicular excurrent ducts. J Reprod Immunol 1994; 26: 167 216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED. Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fawcett DW, Neaves WB, Flores MN. Comparative observations on intertubular lymphatics and the organization of the interstitial tissue of the mammalian testis. Biol Reprod 1973; 9: 500 532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lipsett MB, Wilson H, Kirschner MA, Korenman SG, Fishman LM, Sarfaty GA, Bardin CW. Studies on Leydig cell physiology and pathology: secretion and metabolism of testosterone. Recent Prog Horm Res 1966; 22: 245 281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bartlett JM, Weinbauer GF, Nieschlag E. Differential effects of FSH and testosterone on the maintenance of spermatogenesis in the adult hypophysectomized rat. J Endocrinol 1989; 121: 49 58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Walsh EL, Cuyler WK, McCullagh DR. The physiologic maintenance of the male sex glands. Am J Physiol 1934; 107: 508 512. [Google Scholar]
  21. Maeda T, Goto A, Kobayashi D, Tamai I. Transport of organic cations across the blood-testis barrier. Mol Pharm 2007; 4: 600 607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Russell LD. Form, dimensions, and cytology of mammalian Sertoli cells. Russell LD, Griswold MD. (eds.), The Sertoli Cell. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1990: 1 37. [Google Scholar]
  23. Russell L. Movement of spermatocytes from the basal to the adluminal compartment of the rat testis. Am J Anat 1977; 148: 313 328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Russell LD. The blood-testis barrier and its formation relative to spermatocyte maturation in the adult rat: a lanthanum tracer study. Anat Rec 1978; 190: 99 111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Setchell BP, Breed WG. Anatomy, vasculature, and innervation of the male reproductive tract. Neill JD. (ed.), Physiology of Reproduction, 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier Press; 2006: 771 825. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kerr JB, Loveland KL, O'Bryan MK, de Kretser DM. Cytology of the testis and instrinsic control mechanisms. Neill JD. (ed.), Physiology of Reproduction, 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier Press; 2006: 827 947. [Google Scholar]
  27. Griswold MD, McLean D. The Sertoli cell. Neill JD. (ed.), Physiology of Reproduction, 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier Press; 2006: 949 975. [Google Scholar]
  28. Reid BL, Cleland KW. The structure and fuction of the epididymis. 1. The histology of the rat epididymis. Aust J Zool 1957; 5: 223 246. [Google Scholar]
  29. Turner TT. De Graaf's thread: the human epididymis. J Androl 2008; 29: 237 250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Robaire B, Hinton BT, Orgebin-Crist MC. The epididymis. Neill JD. (ed.), Physiology of Reproduction, 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier Press; 2006: 1071 1148. [Google Scholar]
  31. Orgebin-Crist MC. Studies on the function of the epididymis. Biol Reprod 1969; 1 (suppl 1): 155 175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Cornwall GA. New insights into epididymal biology and function. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15: 213 227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Russell LD, Peterson RN. Sertoli cell junctions: morphological and functional correlates. Int Rev Cytol 1985; 94: 177 211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kormano M. Penetration of intravenous trypan blue into the rat testis and epididymis. Acta Histochem 1968; 30: 133 136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Weihe E, Nimmrich H, Metz J, Forssmann WG. Horseradish peroxidase as a tracer for capillary permeability studies. J Histochem Cytochem 1979; 27: 1357 1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Setchell BP, Pollanen P, Zupp JL. Development of the blood-testis barrier and changes in vascular permeability at puberty in rats. Int J Androl 1988; 11: 225 233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dym M. The fine structure of the monkey (Macaca) Sertoli cell and its role in maintaining the blood-testis barrier. Anat Rec 1973; 175: 639 656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Flickinger C, Fawcett DW. The junctional specializations of Sertoli cells in the seminiferous epithelium. Anat Rec 1967; 158: 207 221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pelletier RM. Cyclic formation and decay of the blood-testis barrier in the mink (Mustela vison), a seasonal breeder. Am J Anat 1986; 175: 91 117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Li MW, Mruk DD, Lee WM, Cheng CY. Connexin 43 and plakophilin-2 as a protein complex that regulates blood-testis barrier dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 10213 10218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Cheng CY, Mruk DD. Regulation of blood-testis barrier dynamics by focal adhesion kinase (FAK): an unexpected turn of events. Cell Cycle 2009; 8: 3493 3499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Chihara M, Otsuka S, Ichii O, Hashimoto Y, Kon Y. Molecular dynamics of the blood-testis barrier components during murine spermatogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 2010; 77: 630 639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Friend DS, Gilula NB. Variations in tight and gap junctions in mammalian tissues. J Cell Biol 1972; 53: 758 776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Suzuki F, Nagano T. Regional differentiation of cell junctions in the excurrent duct epithelium of the rat testis as revealed by freeze-fracture. Anat Rec 1978; 191: 503 519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Cyr DG, Robaire B, Hermo L. Structure and turnover of junctional complexes between principal cells of the rat epididymis. Microsc Res Tech 1995; 30: 54 66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pelletier RM. Freeze-fracture study of cell junctions in the epididymis and vas deferens of a seasonal breeder: the mink (Mustela vison). Microsc Res Tech 1995; 30: 37 53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Cyr DG, Hermo L, Blaschuk OW, Robaire B. Distribution and regulation of epithelial cadherin messenger ribonucleic acid and immunocytochemical localization of epithelial cadherin in the rat epididymis. Endocrinology 1992; 130: 353 363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. DeBellefeuille S, Hermo L, Gregory M, Dufresne J, Cyr DG. Catenins in the rat epididymis: their expression and regulation in adulthood and during postnatal development. Endocrinology 2003; 144: 5040 5049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gregory M, Cyr DG. Identification of multiple claudins in the rat epididymis. Mol Reprod Dev 2006; 73: 580 588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Cyr DG, Gregory M, Dube E, Dufresne J, Chan PT, Hermo L. Orchestration of occludins, claudins, catenins and cadherins as players involved in maintenance of the blood-epididymal barrier in animals and humans. Asian J Androl 2007; 9: 463 475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Setchell BP, Voglmayr JK, Waites GM. A blood-testis barrier restricting passage from blood into rete testis fluid but not into lymph. J Physiol 1969; 200: 73 85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Turner TT, D'Addario DA, Howards SS. Effects of vasectomy on the blood-testis barrier of the hamster. J Reprod Fertil 1979; 55: 323 328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Turner TT, Hartmann PK, Howards SS. Urea in the seminiferous tubule: evidence for active transport. Biol Reprod 1979; 20: 511 515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Turner TT, D'Addario DA, Howards SS. [3H]3-O-methyl-D-glucose transport from blood into the lumina of the seminiferous and epididymal tubules in intact and vasectomized hamsters. J Reprod Fertil 1980; 60: 285 289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hinton BT, Howards SS. Permeability characteristics of the epithelium in the rat caput epididymidis. J Reprod Fertil 1981; 63: 95 99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Turner TT, Cochran RC, Howards SS. Transfer of steroids across the hamster blood testis and blood epididymal barriers. Biol Reprod 1981; 25: 342 348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Turner TT, D'Addario DA, Howards SS. The blood epididymal barrier to [3H]-inulin in intact and vasectomized hamsters. Invest Urol 1981; 19: 89 91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Setchell BP. The movement of fluids and substances in the testis. Aust J Biol Sci 1986; 39: 193 207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hinton BT, Setchell BP. Fluid secretion and movement. Russell LD, Griswold MD. (eds.), The Sertoli Cell. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1993: 249 267. [Google Scholar]
  60. Banks WA, McLay RN, Kastin AJ, Sarmiento U, Scully S. Passage of leptin across the blood-testis barrier. Am J Physiol 1999; 276: E1099 E1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kobayashi D, Goto A, Maeda T, Nezu J, Tsuji A, Tamai I. OCTN2-mediated transport of carnitine in isolated Sertoli cells. Reproduction 2005; 129: 729 736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Meng J, Holdcraft RW, Shima JE, Griswold MD, Braun RE. Androgens regulate the permeability of the blood-testis barrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 16696 16700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Angulo C, Castro MA, Rivas CI, Segretain D, Maldonado R, Yanez AJ, Slebe JC, Vera JC, Concha II. Molecular identification and functional characterization of the vitamin C transporters expressed by Sertoli cells. J Cell Physiol 2008; 217: 708 716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Schnabolk GW, Gupta B, Mulgaonkar A, Kulkarni M, Sweet DH. Organic anion transporter 6 (Slc22a20) specificity and Sertoli cell specific expression provide new insight to potential endogenous roles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2010; 334: 927 935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Hinton BT, Howards SS. Rat testis and epididymis can transport [3H] 3-O-methyl-D-glucose, [3H] inositol and [3H] alpha-aminoisobutyric acid across its epithelia in vivo. Biol Reprod 1982; 27: 1181 1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hinton BT, Hernandez H. Selective luminal absorption of L-carnitine from the proximal regions of the rat epididymis: possible relationships to development of sperm motility. J Androl 1985; 6: 300 305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hinton BT, Hernandez H. Neutral amino acid absorption by the rat epididymis. Biol Reprod 1987; 37: 288 292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rodriguez CM, Labus JC, Hinton BT. Organic cation/carnitine transporter, OCTN2, is differentially expressed in the adult rat epididymis. Biol Reprod 2002; 67: 314 319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Cheung KH, Leung GP, Leung MC, Shum WW, Zhou WL, Wong PY. Cell-cell interaction underlies formation of fluid in the male reproductive tract of the rat. J Gen Physiol 2005; 125: 443 454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Pastor-Soler N, Pietrement C, Breton S. Role of acid/base transporters in the male reproductive tract and potential consequences of their malfunction. Physiology 2005; 20: 417 428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Da Silva N, Shum WW, Breton S. Regulation of vacuolar proton pumping ATPase-dependent luminal acidification in the epididymis. Asian J Androl 2007; 9: 476 482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Shum WW, Da Silva N, Brown D, Breton S. Regulation of luminal acidification in the male reproductive tract via cell-cell crosstalk. J Exp Biol 2009; 212: 1753 1761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Cotton LM, Rodriguez CM, Suzuki K, Orgebin-Crist MC, Hinton BT. Organic cation/carnitine transporter, OCTN2, transcriptional activity is regulated by osmotic stress in epididymal cells. Mol Reprod Dev 2010; 77: 114 125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Wong V, Russell LD. Three-dimensional reconstruction of a rat stage V Sertoli cell: I. Methods, basic configuration, and dimensions. Am J Anat 1983; 167: 143 161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Barker CF, Billingham RE. Immunologically privileged sites. Adv Immunol 1977; 25: 1 54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Setchell BP. The testis and tissue transplantation: historical aspects. J Reprod Immunol 1990; 18: 1 8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Selawry HP. Islet Transplantation to immunoprivileged sites. Lanza RP, Chick WL. (eds.), Pancreatic Islet Transplantation, vol 2, Immunomodulation of Pancreatic Islets. Austin, TX: Landes/CRC Press; 1994: 75 86. [Google Scholar]
  78. Dufour JM, Rajotte RV, Korbutt GS, Emerich DF. Harnessing the immunomodulatory properties of Sertoli cells to enable xenotransplantation in type I diabetes. Immunol Invest 2003; 32: 275 297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Johnson MH, Setchell BP. Protein and immunoglobulin content of rete testis fluid of rams. J Reprod Fertil 1968; 17: 403 406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Johnson MH. The distribution of immunoglobulin and spermatozoal autoantigen in the genital tract of the male guinea pig: its relationship to autoallergic orchitis. Fertil Steril 1972; 23: 383 392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Dym M, Romrell LJ. Intraepithelial lymphocytes in the male reproductive tract of rats and rhesus monkeys. J Reprod Fertil 1975; 42: 1 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wang J, Wreford NG, Lan HY, Atkins R, Hedger MP. Leukocyte populations of the adult rat testis following removal of the Leydig cells by treatment with ethane dimethane sulfonate and subcutaneous testosterone implants. Biol Reprod 1994; 51: 551 561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Rival C, Lustig L, Iosub R, Guazzone VA, Schneider E, Meinhardt A, Fijak M. Identification of a dendritic cell population in normal testis and in chronically inflamed testis of rats with autoimmune orchitis. Cell Tissue Res 2006; 324: 311 318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Yule TD, Montoya GD, Russell LD, Williams TM, Tung KS. Autoantigenic germ cells exist outside the blood–testis barrier. Journal Immunol 1988; 141: 1161 1167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Marsh JA, O'Hern P, Goldberg E. The role of an X-linked gene in the regulation of secondary humoral response kinetics to sperm-specific LDH-C4 antigens. J Immunol 1981; 126: 100 106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Samy ET, Setiady YY, Ohno K, Pramoonjago P, Sharp C, Tung KS. The role of physiological self-antigen in the acquisition and maintenance of regulatory T-cell function. Immunol Rev 2006; 212: 170 184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Yule TD, Mahi-Brown CA, Tung KS. Role of testicular autoantigens and influence of lymphokines in testicular autoimmune disease. J Reprod Immunol 1990; 18: 89 103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Mital P, Kaur G, Dufour JM. Immunoprotective sertoli cells: making allogeneic and xenogeneic transplantation feasible. Reproduction 2010; 139: 495 504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Dufour JM, Lord SJ, Kin T, Rayat GR, Dixon DE, Bleackley RC, Korbutt GS, Rajotte RV. Comparison of successful and unsuccessful islet/Sertoli cell co-transplant grafts in streptozotocin induced diabetic mice. Cell Transplant 2008; 16: 1029 1038. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Dufour JM, Dass B, Halley K, Korbutt GS, Dixon DE, Rajotte RV. Sertoli cell line lacks the immunoprotective properties associated with primary Sertoli cells. Cell Transplant 2008; 17: 525 534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Gow A, Southwood CM, Li JS, Pariali M, Riordan GP, Brodie SE, Danias J, Bronstein JM, Kachar B, Lazzarini RA. CNS myelin and sertoli cell tight junction strands are absent in Osp/claudin-11 null mice. Cell 1999; 99: 649 659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Wong CH, Mruk DD, Lee WM, Cheng CY. Targeted and reversible disruption of the blood-testis barrier by an FSH mutant-occludin peptide conjugate. FASEB J 2007; 21: 438 448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Serre V, Robaire B. Distribution of immune cells in the epididymis of the aging Brown Norway rat is segment-specific and related to the luminal content. Biol Reprod 1999; 61: 705 714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wong PY, Tsang AY, Fu WO, Lau HK. Restricted entry of an anti-rat epididymal protein IgG into the rat epididymis. Int J Androl 1983; 6: 275 282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Yeung CH, Bergmann M, Cooper TG. Non-specific uptake of IgG by rat epididymal tubules in vitro. Int J Androl 1991; 14: 364 373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Knee RA, Hickey DK, Beagley KW, Jones RC. Transport of IgG across the blood-luminal barrier of the male reproductive tract of the rat and the effect of estradiol administration on reabsorption of fluid and IgG by the epididymal ducts. Biol Reprod 2005; 73: 688 694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Kazeem AA. A critical consideration of the rat epididymis as an immunologically privileged site. Scand J Immunol 1988; 27: 149 156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Itoh M, Xie Q, Miyamoto K, Takeuchi Y. Major differences between the testis and epididymis in the induction of granulomas in response to extravasated germ cells. I. A light microscopical study in mice. Int J Androl 1999; 22: 316 323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Itoh M, Chen XH, Takeuchi Y, Miki T. Morphological demonstration of the immune privilege in the testis using adjuvants: tissue responses of male reproductive organs in mice injected with Bordetella pertussigens. Arch Histol Cytol 1995; 58: 575 579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Author Biosketches

Articles from Biology of Reproduction are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES