Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease logoLink to Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
. 2015 Nov;6(6):328–338. doi: 10.1177/2040622315608647

Pharmacological treatment of spondyloarthritis: exploring the effectiveness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biological therapies

Francesco Caso 1, Luisa Costa 2, Antonio Del Puente 3, Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno 4, Gelsy Lupoli 5, Raffaele Scarpa 6, Rosario Peluso 7,✉
PMCID: PMC4622317  PMID: 26568809

Abstract

Spondyloarthritis represents a heterogeneous group of articular inflammatory diseases that share common genetic, clinical and radiological features. The therapy target of spondyloarthritis relies mainly in improving patients’ quality of life, controlling articular inflammation, preventing the structural joints damage and preserving the functional abilities, autonomy and social participation of patients. Among these, traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs have been demonstrated to be effective in the management of peripheral arthritis; moreover, in the last decade, biological therapies have improved the approach to spondyloarthritis. In patients with axial spondyloarthritis, tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors are currently the only effective therapy in patients for whom conventional therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs has failed. The aim of this review is to summarize the current experience and evidence about the pharmacological approach in spondyloarthritis patients.

Keywords: biological therapies, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, spondyloarthritis

Introduction

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) represents a heterogeneous group of articular inflammatory diseases involving spine, sacroiliac and, less frequently, peripheral joints (asymmetric mono-arthritis or oligo-arthritis), which prototype is represented by ankylosing spondylitis (AS) [Raychaudhuri and Deodhar, 2014]. The clinical spectrum of SpA can be found in patients affected by psoriasis or having familiarity for psoriasis [psoriatic arthritis (PsA)] [Scarpa et al. 2007; Peluso et al. 2015], by inflammatory bowel disease [IBD; enteropathic spondyloarthritis (EASpA)] [Peluso et al. 2013a], or by infectious triggering diseases [reactive arthritis (ReA)] [Selmi and Gershwin, 2014]; it can also be separate from any of these forms, remaining uncharacterized [undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy (USpA)] [Olivieri et al. 2012]. The SpA genetic background provides frequent positivity for major histocompatibility complex molecules, mainly represented by the HLA-B27 antigen, but several predisposing and susceptibility factors can be associated [Chatzikyriakidou et al. 2011].

The main goal of the SpA management is to reduce disease activity and control joint damage, improving the quality of life and preserving the functional abilities of patients as well as autonomy and social participation. The successful management of extra-articular clinical findings of SpA, such as psoriasis, uveitis, and IBD, requires active cooperation between the rheumatologist and other specialists, in collaboration with the primary care physician. Further, information and education of patients represent key factors for improving SpA outcome, as well as rehabilitation represented by home exercises [Olivieri et al. 2014].

In parallel with progress in the understanding of various pathogenetic and clinical aspects of SpA [Atzeni et al. 2014; Scarpa et al. 2008], advances in diagnostics (adoption of new criteria and the use of magnetic resonance [Tillett et al. 2012; Wendling et al. 2012b; Peluso et al. 2012; Pedersen et al. 2012; Soscia et al. 2009]) has given the opportunity to identify early and nonradiographic phases in SpA, which can be useful to prevent and monitor structural damage [Scarpa et al. 2011; Fiocco et al. 2013].

It has been demonstrated that traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tDMARDs) are ineffective in the treatment of patients with axial involvement. Specifically, efficacy of methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SSZ), leflunomide (LFN), and cyclosporine A (CsA) in inhibiting radiologic joint damage still needs to be clarified [Favalli et al. 2014; Wendling et al. 2014].

Meanwhile, therapy has evolved thanks to the growing understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of the disease, involving dysfunction and over-secretion of multiple pro-inflammatory molecules, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [Fiocco et al. 2014; Chimenti et al. 2013]. As a consequence, the recent introduction of TNF-α inhibitors has offered new perspectives for SpA patients, with impressive improvements of their clinical outcome [Olivieri et al. 2012; Novelli et al. 2014]. Currently, five biological agents that target TNF-α are available [with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval] for the therapy of SpA, namely infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETN), golimumab (GOL), and certolizumab pegol (CTZ). These drugs are reasonably safe in SpA, in particular in association with close and careful monitoring.

The aim of this review is to summarize the current experience and evidence about the pharmacological approach in SpA.

From nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

According to the recommendations of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), the first-line therapy of SpA is represented by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and nonpharmacological treatment [Wendling et al. 2014; Braun et al. 2011]. NSAID therapy effectively controls joint symptoms and signs of axial involvement [Escalas et al. 2010; Benhamou et al. 2010], giving no significant effects on laboratory markers of inflammation [Escalas et al. 2010]; moreover, some studies suggest NSAIDs have beneficial effect on axial structural damage [Wendling, 2013]. When they are contraindicated (i.e. cardiovascular and/or gastrointestinal and/or renal diseases), physical therapy and/or treatment with analgesics should be evaluated as first-line treatment, because they can control articular manifestations in SpA patients.

Recent studies confirm the beneficial effects of physical therapy and self-rehabilitation programs on disease activity and functional status (BASDAI and BASFI) [Eppeland et al. 2013; Staalesen Strumse et al. 2011]. A recent study has shown significantly greater improvements in the BASDAI, motion ranges, and BASFI, with a persistent effect for many months later [Masiero et al. 2011]. On the other hand, analgesic agents can be used in patients with residual pain despite NSAIDs therapy, and in patients with contraindications or intolerance to NSAIDs [Ramiro et al. 2011].

Intra-articular steroid injections into the affected joints can be used mainly for treatment of peripheral manifestations (arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis) and in the treatment of active sacroiliitis (CT-guided injections) in axial subset [Braun et al. 1996]: they provide rapid but only temporary relief. A recent study has compared locally injected betamethasone to locally injected ETN in patients with refractory enthesitis; the results have shown significant improvements in both groups of patients with no significant differences after 12 weeks [Huang et al. 2011].

Systemic steroids are usually not recommended in the treatment of axial involvement of SpA, because they have adverse effects and there is little data in the literature to confirm their validity. However, these drugs may deserve attention when the peripheral joint manifestations are not well controlled, in the absence of effective or possible treatment options (i.e. in patients with contraindications to TNF-α inhibitors). In these cases, short-term treatment in severe forms (intravenous pulse therapy for 2 weeks) with the lowest possible dosage of systemic steroids have been suggested [Haibel et al. 2012; Peters and Ejstrup, 1992].

The tDMARDs, such as MTX, SSZ, and LFN, are generally not effective in the management of axial and/or entheseal involvement in SpA patients [Braun et al. 2006; Haibel et al. 2005a, 2007]. They can be considered in patients with peripheral involvement who do not respond to NSAIDs and/or local glucocorticoid injections [Kingsley et al. 2012; Dougados et al. 2012]. However, tDMARDs should be selected according to the patient’s clinical profile (i.e. MTX should be given in patients with SpA and cutaneous psoriasis). Some tDMARDs, such as SSZ and MTX, may also improve extra-articular manifestations, such as uveitis and bowel disease in patients with SpA. Moreover, the experts agree that tDMARDs are not indicated in patients with isolated entheseal involvement [van den Berg et al. 2012; Gossec et al. 2012; Ash et al. 2012].

Biological therapies

Since the beginning of 2000, TNF-α-inhibitors are used for the management of SpA. TNF-α inhibitors, usually administrated after the failure of tDMARDs, have the same efficacy in PsA [Atteno et al. 2010; Ritchlin et al. 2009] and in axial involvement of SpA [Baraliakos et al. 2012; Migliore et al. 2012]. It is not well known whether MTX gives an additive or synergistic benefit when used in combination with TNF-α-inhibitors in PsA. Nevertheless, a recent study [Fagerli et al. 2014] revealed that MTX has a role in the retention rate of biological therapy but not in response rate; the results showed it is useful only in association with IFX for its potential value to suppress antibody formation against biological therapies [Atzeni et al. 2013; Bruner et al. 2014]. In the RAPID-ax-SpA study, CTZ was demonstrated to be effective in reducing signs and symptoms of axial involvement in patients with SpA, AS and nonradiographic axial SpA (nr-axSpA) [Landewé et al. 2014]. Moreover, CTZ, in the RAPID–PsA study, showed inhibition of radiographic progression in patients with PsA after 24 weeks of therapy [Landewé et al. 2014]. Although only ADA has been approved for nr-axSpA, [Sieper et al. 2013], ETN [Song et al. 2013], CTZ [Landewé et al. 2014; Song and Rudwaleit, 2013], and IFX [Sieper et al. 2014a, 2014b] have been demonstrated to be effective and safe for patients with this SpA subtype. In arthritis related to IBD, TNF-α inhibitors, with the exclusion of ETN [Sandborn et al. 2001; Song et al. 2008], are used to treat bowel disease and joint involvement [Denmark and Mayer, 2013].

Recently, some studies showed the efficacy of therapy with TNF-α inhibitors in the treatment of extra-articular manifestation of SpA, such as uveitis [Levy-Clarke and Nussenblatt, 2006; van der Horst-Bruinsma and Nurmohamed, 2012]. TNF-α inhibitors significantly reduce the incidence of uveitis flares in patients with AS [Braun et al. 2005]. However, more recently, Guignard and colleagues demonstrated that the incidence of uveitis remained unchanged with ETN treatment, whereas it was dramatically reduced after treatment with IFX and ADA [Guignard et al. 2006]. In a prospective study, a significant decrease in recurrence rate of uveitis during ADA treatment was observed [van Denderen et al. 2014]. There has been a recent observational report showing the utility of GOL in SpA associated with refractory uveitis [Miserocchi et al. 2014]. Although TNF-α inhibitors are effective in the treatment of skin and nail lesions of psoriasis, about 5% of patients may develop an onset or exacerbation of psoriasis during treatment [Kary et al. 2006; Wendling et al. 2008]. TNF-α inhibitors showed quite different effects on the bowel. IFX and ADA are effective in SpA and IBD, while GOL is not approved for the treatment of Crohn’s disease, but only for moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis [Braun et al. 2007; Rutgeerts et al. 2005; Sandborn et al. 2007]. In a meta-analysis of trials on the use of TNF-α-inhibitors in patients with AS, it was demonstrated ETN and ADA cause increased incidence of flares or new onset of IBD when compared with IFX [Braun et al. 2007]. Furthermore, in patients with a history of IBD flares, these were more likely to occur in patients with AS receiving ETN or ADA than in those treated with IFX.

TNF-α inhibitors might decrease the cardiovascular manifestations and atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in SpA patients [Di Minno et al. 2011, 2012, 2015; Costa et al. 2012]. Moreover, regardless of the type of diet, a successful weight loss (⩾5% from baseline values) is associated with a higher rate of achievement of MDA in overweight/obese SpA patients who start treatment with TNF-α inhibitors [Di Minno et al. 2014].

According to the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis guidelines (GRAPPA) [Acosta Felquer et al. 2014], in patients with peripheral PsA, administration of at least one tDMARD for more than 3 months is useful.

Before starting TNF-α inhibitor therapy, it is necessary to screen patients for latent tuberculosis and viral infections [Sanduzzi et al. 2012; Atteno et al. 2014] to identify promptly people at high risk of reactivating the disease [Peluso et al. 2013b; Costa et al. 2014].

However, since TNF-α inhibitors in some patients fail to control the disease, or are contraindicated or able to induce paradoxical and side effects, new options in the therapeutic area have been explored in order to offer an alternative to SpA refractory subjects. Loss of efficacy of TNF-α inhibitors could appear over time also in patients who are initially responders to these drugs. New molecules targeting pathways other than TNF-α-mediated one are emerging for the treatment of SpA. However, clinical trials on biological therapies that were conducted over the past years, have showed that they are effective in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but they have not yielded relevant improvements in patients with axial and/or peripheral SpA.

In detail, abatacept (ABA) has no significant effect on clinical features of SpA in the short term. Recently, Song and colleagues studied the efficacy of ABA in 30 patients with AS (15 TNF-α-inhibitor-naive patients and 15 nonresponders to TNF-α inhibitors) and demonstrated that ASAS-40 was reached by 13% of the TNF-α-inhibitor-naive patients and by none of the nonresponders to TNF-α inhibitors [Song et al. 2011]. More recently, Lekpa and colleagues showed the lack of efficacy of ABA in axial SpA [Lekpa et al. 2012a].

Tocilizumab (TOC) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that competitively inhibits interleukin (IL)-6 by blocking the binding site to the IL-6R, and is approved for patients with refractory RA. TOC is emerging as a potential therapeutic strategy in other rheumatic disorders for its IL-6-mediated effects on immune system and inflammatory processes [Woodrick and Ruderman, 2012; Abisror et al. 2013]. However, TOC did not show any clinical improvement in patients with axial SpA [Lekpa et al. 2012b].

Recently, Sieper and colleagues demonstrated no differences between patients with AS treated with TOC and patients receiving placebo at 12 weeks, although a reduction of C-reactive protein levels was observed in the TOC arm [Sieper et al. 2014c]. However, the decrease of inflammatory markers was not associated with any clinical improvement.

Some case reports have recently been published on treatment of PsA with TOC [Hughes and Chinoy, 2013; Costa et al. 2014]. For two patients, TOC was effective in inducing a resolution of articular manifestations; however, Ogata and colleagues reported an inadequate response to TOC in two PsA patients [Ogata et al. 2012]. TOC could be considered in a subset of PsA patients resembling RA, refractory to conventional and biological (TNF-α inhibitors) therapies, but the number of published reports of use of TOC in PsA is still low.

Sarilumab (SAR) is currently in two phase III studies as a treatment for RA (RA-MOBILITY study). In 2010, a phase III study was started with the aim to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of SAR in patients with AS; it was stopped because no improvement in efficacy was observed [Sieper et al. 2012].

Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against the protein CD20. An open-label study was performed by Song and colleagues on 20 patients with active AS (10 patients were TNF-α-inhibitor naïve), treated with two pulses of RTX, separated by 2 weeks [Song et al. 2010]. At 6 months, the results showed that 40% of patients achieved ASAS-20 and BASDAI-20, while 25% were ASAS-40 and BASDAI-50 responders. Moreover, TNFα-inhibitors naïve patients were found to be better responders, with 50% and 60% achieving ASAS-20 and BASDAI-20, respectively.

However, a French study on eight patients with SpA receiving RTX showed less favorable outcomes [Nocturne et al. 2010]. Another observational study reported moderate efficacy of RTX in SpA, it was more marked in TNF-α-inhibitor-naive patients [Wendling et al. 2012a].

Among newer therapies studied to date, inhibition of interleukin-17A by secukinumab (SEC), and of the IL-12/23 receptor by ustekinumab (USK), seems to give the best results in SpA [Scarpa et al. 2013].

Baeten and colleagues studied AS patients who were randomly assigned to SEC treatment or placebo infusion [Baeten et al. 2013]; they demonstrated that 61% of patients treated with SEC achieved ASAS-20 compared with 17% of patients treated with placebo. Moreover, 35% of patients treated with SEC achieved ASAS-40 and ASAS-5/6 responses, respectively. However, these data need to be confirmed by larger randomized placebo-controlled studies with longer duration of follow up.

USK is a fully human immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody direct against a common subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, effective in the management of psoriasis [Gottlieb and Narang, 2013]. Furthermore, USK significantly improved active PsA compared with placebo, therefore it might offer an alternative therapeutic choice to TNF-α inhibitors [McInnes et al. 2013]. Recently, in an open-label clinical trial, USK use was associated with a reduction in signs and symptoms of active AS. In this study, ASAS-20, ASAS-5/6, and ASAS-40 were reached in 75%, 50%, and 65% of the patients, respectively. Moreover, a significant improvement in other patient-reported outcome parameters and active inflammation (as detected by MRI), as well as a significant reduction of NSAIDs intake, occurred during USK treatment [Poddubnyy et al. 2014].

Apremilast (APM) represents a molecule that specifically targets phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4). Recently, large double-blind and randomized multicenter studies demonstrated that APM is effective in the treatment of psoriasis, PsA, and AS, with significantly higher numbers of patients achieving the endpoints compared with baseline [Pathan et al. 2013; Schett et al. 2012].

Anakinra (ANK) (IL-1 receptor antagonist) has been approved for active RA patients and it is useful in many inflammatory diseases [Néel et al. 2014; Cantarini et al. 2014]. There are no large trials evaluating its efficacy in SpA patients but, among available data, some reports showed a clinical benefit only in a small number of patients, without showing MRI improvement. In these studies, carried out in PsA and AS patients [Jung et al. 2010; Haibel et al. 2005b; Bennett et al. 2008], adverse events were mainly mild and the most frequent were injection site reactions.

Conclusions

The main goal of the management of SpA is to reduce disease activity and to control joint damage and extra-articular manifestations, improving the quality of life and preserving the functional abilities of patients as well as autonomy and social participation by an active cooperation between physicians. Further, patient information and education, also by rehabilitation, represent key determinants for improving SpA outcomes.

A crucial point for clinicians is represented by the management of the individual patient with his/her heterogeneous complexity, which dictates that the pharmacological management of SpA needs to be varied.

Traditional therapies consist of different choices ranging from NSAIDs and steroids in early phases and/or mild forms of the disease, to monotherapy or combined therapy with tDMARDs for the suppression of inflammation in refractory peripheral joint disease.

NSAIDs, low-dosage oral and intra-articular steroids are commonly used in SpA and often represent the first choice of therapy. These therapies have not been extensively studied and available data are not conclusive in defining their efficacy in improving disease outcome.

In SpA patients with refractory peripheral joint disease, the most used tDMARDs are represented by MTX and SSZ; however, low level of scientific evidence can justify their use. Over the last decade, due to the high expectations that biologic drugs such as TNF-α inhibitors are raising remarkable changes have also been obtained in the field of SpA therapies. TNF-α inhibitors could be considered an effective treatment for patients in whom conventional therapy with NSAIDs and/or tDMARDs have failed.

Although the TNF-α inhibitors have proven to be effective in the treatment of SpA, there is a clinical need for new therapies with other mechanisms of action in these conditions; this need is due to the increasing number of nonresponder patients for whom TNF-α-inhibitor therapy is contraindicated. Among the newer therapies, targeting of IL-17, IL-12/23, and PDE4, seems to show more promising results than therapies targeting T-cell co-stimulation, B-cell surface antigens, and IL-6 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Biological therapies for spondyloarthritis.

Drugs Mechanism of action Spa subtype(efficacy) Extra-articular manifestation
Infliximab Chimeric TNF inhibitor AS*‡, PsA*‡, nr-axSpA UC*‡, CD*‡, psoriasis*‡, uveitis
Etanercept Fusion protein TNF inhibitor AS*‡, PsA*‡, nr-axSpA* Psoriasis*‡, uveitis?
Adalimumab Fully human TNF inhibitor AS*‡, PsA*‡, nr-axSpA* UC*‡, CD*‡, psoriasis*‡, uveitis
Golimumab Fully human TNF inhibitor AS*‡, PsA*‡ UC*‡, uveitis
Certolizumab PEGylated Fc-free TNF inhibitor AS*‡, PsA*‡, nr-axSpA* CD‡
Abatacept T-cell co-stimulation inhibitor PsA?
Rituximab Anti-CD20 (anti-β cell) AS?
Tocilizumab IL-6R inhibitor PsA?
Sarilumab IL-6R inhibitor ?
Secukinumab IL-17A inhibitor PsA, AS? Psoriasis*‡
Ustekinumab Fully human IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitor PsA*‡ Psoriasis*‡
Apremilast PDE4 inhibitor AS, PsA*‡ Psoriasis*
Anakinra IL-1 inhibitor AS?, PSA?
Open in a new tab
*

Approved by the European Medicines Agency.

‡

Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IL, interleukin; AS, ankylosing spondylitis; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; nr-axSpA, nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis; UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, Crohn’s disease.

However, further large controlled studies with longer-term follow-up periods are needed to corroborate recent observations on biological therapies other than TNF-α inhibitors.

Footnotes

Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest statement: The authors do not have any conflicts of interest related to the subject matter.

Contributor Information

Francesco Caso, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, and Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, Italy.

Luisa Costa, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, and Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, Italy.

Antonio Del Puente, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, Italy.

Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno, Unit of Cell and Molecular Biology in Cardiovascular Diseases, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Gelsy Lupoli, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II Naples, Italy.

Raffaele Scarpa, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, Italy.

Rosario Peluso, Rheumatology Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II - Via Sergio Pansini 5 - 80131 Naples, Italy.

References

  1. Abisror N., Mekinian A., Lavigne C., Vandenhende M., Soussan M., Fain O., et al. (2013) Tocilizumab in refractory Takayasu arteritis: a case series and updated literature review. Autoimmun Rev 12: 1143–1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Acosta Felquer M., Coates L., Soriano E., Ranza R., Espinoza L., Helliwell P., et al. (2014) Drug therapies for peripheral joint disease in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 41: 2277–2285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ash Z., Gaujoux-Viala C., Gossec L., Hensor E., FitzGerald O., Winthrop K., et al. (2012) A systematic literature review of drug therapies for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: current evidence and metaanalysis informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 71: 319–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atteno M., Costa L., Matarese A., Caso F., Del Puente A., Cantarini L., et al. (2014) The use of TNF-α blockers in psoriatic arthritis patients with latent tuberculosis infection. Clin Rheumatol 33: 543–547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Atteno M., Peluso R., Costa L., Padula S., Iervolino S., Caso F., et al. (2010) Comparison of effectiveness and safety of infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab in psoriatic arthritis patients who experienced an inadequate response to previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Clin Rheumatol 29: 399–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Atzeni F., Defendenti C., Ditto M., Batticciotto A., Ventura D., Antivalle M., et al. (2014) Rheumatic manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease. Autoimmun Rev 13: 20–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Atzeni F., Talotta R., Salaffi F., Cassinotti A., Varisco V., Battellino M., et al. (2013) Immunogenicity and autoimmunity during anti-TNF therapy. Autoimmun Rev 12: 703–708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baeten D., Baraliakos X., Braun J., Sieper J., Emery P., van der Heijde D., et al. (2013) Anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody secukinumab in treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 382: 1705–1713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baraliakos X., van den Berg R., Braun J., van der Heijde D. (2012) Update of the literature review on treatment with biologics as a basis for the first update of the ASAS/EULAR management recommendations of ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology 51: 1378–1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Benhamou M., Gossec L., Dougados M. (2010) Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein in ankylosing spondylitis and evaluation of the NSAIDs/COXIBs’ treatment effect on C-reactive protein. Rheumatology 49: 536–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bennett A., Tan A., Coates L., Emery P., Marzo-Ortega H., McGonagle D. (2008) Sustained response to anakinra in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology 47: 223–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Braun J., Baraliakos X., Listing J., Davis J., van der Heijde D., Haibel H., et al. (2007) Differences in the incidence of flares or new onset of inflammatory bowel diseases in patients with ankylosing spondylitis exposed to therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents. Arthritis Rheum 57: 639–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Braun J., Baraliakos X., Listing J., Sieper J. (2005) Decreased incidence of anterior uveitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with the anti-tumor necrosis factor agents infliximab and etanercept. Arthritis Rheum 52: 2447–2451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Braun J., Bollow M., Seyrekbasan F., Häberle H., Eggens U., Mertz A., et al. (1996) Computed tomography guided corticosteroid injection of the sacroiliac joint in patients with spondyloarthropathy with sacroiliitis: clinical outcome and follow-up by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol 23: 659–664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Braun J., van den Berg R., Baraliakos X., Boehm H., Burgos-Vargas R., Collantes-Estevez E., et al. (2011) 2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 70: 896–904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Braun J., Zochling J., Baraliakos X., Alten R., Burmester G., Grasedyck K., et al. (2006) Efficacy of sulfasalazine in patients with inflammatory back pain due to undifferentiated spondyloarthritis and early ankylosing spondylitis: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 65: 1147–1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bruner V., Atteno M., Spanò A., Scarpa R., Peluso R. (2014) Biological therapies for spondyloarthritis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 6: 92–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cantarini L., Lopalco G., Caso F., Costa L., Iannone F., Lapadula G., et al. (2014) Effectiveness and tuberculosis-related safety profile of interleukin-1 blocking agents in the management of Behçet’s disease. Autoimmun Rev 14: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chatzikyriakidou A., Voulgari P., Drosos A. (2011) What is the role of HLA-B27 in spondyloarthropathies? Autoimmun Rev 10: 464–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chimenti M., Ballanti E., Perricone C., Cipriani P., Giacomelli R., Perricone R. (2013) Immunomodulation in psoriatic arthritis: focus on cellular and molecular pathways. Autoimmun Rev 12: 599–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Costa L., Caso F., Atteno M., Giannitti C., Spadaro A., Ramonda R., et al. (2014) Long-term safety of anti-TNF-α in PsA patients with concomitant HCV infection: a retrospective observational multicenter study on 15 patients. Clin Rheumatol 33: 273–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Costa L., Caso F., D’Elia L., Atteno M., Peluso R., Del Puente A., et al. (2012) Psoriatic arthritis is associated with increased arterial stiffness in the absence of known cardiovascular risk factors: a case control study. Clin Rheumatol 31: 711–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Denmark V., Mayer L. (2013) Current status of monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: an update. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 9: 77–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Di Minno M., Ambrosino P., Lupoli R., Di Minno A., Tasso M., Peluso R., et al. (2015) Cardiovascular risk markers in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a meta-analysis of literature studies. Ann Med 47: 346–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Di Minno M., Iervolino S., Peluso R., Scarpa R., Di Minno G. (2012) TNF-α blockers and carotid intima-media thickness: an emerging issue in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Intern Emerg Med 7(Suppl. 2): 97–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Di Minno M., Iervolino S., Peluso R., Scarpa R., Di Minno G. and CaRRDs study group (2011) Carotid intima-media thickness in psoriatic arthritis: differences between tumor necrosis factor-α blockers and traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31: 705–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Di Minno M., Peluso R., Iervolino S., Russolillo A., Lupoli R., Scarpa R., et al. (2014) Weight loss and achievement of minimal disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis starting treatment with tumour necrosis factor α blockers. Ann Rheum Dis 73: 1157–1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dougados M. (2012) Methotrexate in peripheral spondyloarthritis including psoriatic arthritis: a need for further evaluation. Rheumatology 51: 1343–1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Eppeland S., Diamantopoulos A., Soldal D., Haugeberg G. (2013) Short-term in-patient rehabilitation in axial spondyloarthritis - the results of a 2-week program performed in daily clinical practice. BMC Res Notes 6: 185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Escalas C., Trijau S., Dougados M. (2010) Evaluation of the treatment effect of NSAIDs/TNF blockers according to different domains in ankylosing spondylitis: results of a meta-analysis. Rheumatology 49: 1317–1325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fagerli K., Lie E., van der Heijde D., Heiberg M., Lexberg A., Rødevand E., et al. (2014) The role of methotrexate co-medication in TNF-inhibitor treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from 440 patients included in the NOR-DMARD study. Ann Rheum Dis 73: 132–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Favalli E., Biggioggero M., Meroni P. (2014) Methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the biologic era: still an “anchor” drug? Autoimmun Rev 13: 1102–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fiocco U., Accordi B., Martini V., Oliviero F., Facco M., Cabrelle A., et al. (2014) JAK/STAT/PKCδ molecular pathways in synovial fluid T lymphocytes reflect the in vivo T helper-17 expansion in psoriatic arthritis. Immunol Res 58: 61–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fiocco U., Sfriso P., Oliviero F., Lunardi F., Calabrese F., Scagliori E., et al. (2013) Blockade of intra-articular TNF in peripheral spondyloarthritis: its relevance to clinical scores, quantitative imaging and synovial fluid and synovial tissue biomarkers. Joint Bone Spine 80: 165–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gossec L., Smolen J., Gaujoux-Viala C., Ash Z., Marzo-Ortega H., van der Heijde D., et al. (2012) European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies. Ann Rheum Dis 71: 4–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gottlieb A., Narang K. (2013) Ustekinumab in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: latest findings and clinical potential. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 5: 277–285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Guignard S., Gossec L., Salliot C., Ruyssen-Witrand A., Luc M., Duclos M., et al. (2006) Efficacy of tumour necrosis factor blockers in reducing uveitis flares in patients with spondylarthropathy: a retrospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 65: 1631–1634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Haibel H., Brandt H., Song I., Brandt A., Listing J., Rudwaleit M., et al. (2007) No efficacy of subcutaneous methotrexate in active ankylosing spondylitis: a 16-week open-label trial. Ann Rheum Dis 66: 419–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Haibel H., Fendler C., Listing J. (2012) Efficacy of oral prednisolone in active ankylosing spondylitis – results of a double blind placebo controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 71(Suppl. 3): 247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Haibel H., Rudwaleit M., Braun J., Sieper J. (2005a) Six months open label trial of leflunomide in active ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 64: 124–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Haibel H., Rudwaleit M., Listing J., Sieper J. (2005b) Open label trial of anakinra in active ankylosing spondylitis over 24 weeks. Ann Rheum Dis 64: 296–298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Huang Z., Cao J., Li T., Zheng B., Wang M., Zheng R. (2011) Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided local injections of etanercept into entheses of ankylosing spondylitis patients with refractory Achilles enthesitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 29: 642–649. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hughes M., Chinoy H. (2013) Successful use of tocilizumab in a patient with psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology 52: 1728–1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jung N., Hellmann M., Hoheisel R., Lehmann C., Haase I., Perniok A., et al. (2010) An open-label pilot study of the efficacy and safety of anakinra in patients with psoriatic arthritis refractory to or intolerant of methotrexate (MTX). Clin Rheumatol 29: 1169–1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kary S., Worm M., Audring H., Huscher D., Renelt M., Sörensen H., et al. (2006) New onset or exacerbation of psoriatic skin lesions in patients with definite rheumatoid arthritis receiving tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists. Ann Rheum Dis 65: 405–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kingsley G., Kowalczyk A., Taylor H., Ibrahim F., Packham J., McHugh N., et al. (2012) A randomized placebo-controlled trial of methotrexate in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology 51: 1368–1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Laass M., Roggenbuck D., Conrad K. (2014) Diagnosis and classification of Crohn’s disease. Autoimmun Rev 13: 467–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Landewé R., Braun J., Deodhar A., Dougados M., Maksymowych W., Mease P., et al. (2014) Efficacy of certolizumab pegol on signs and symptoms of axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis: 24-week results of a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Ann Rheum Dis 73: 39–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lekpa F., Farrenq V., Canouï-Poitrine F., Paul M., Chevalier X., Bruckert R., et al. (2012a) Lack of efficacy of abatacept in axial spondylarthropathies refractory to tumor-necrosis-factor inhibition. Joint Bone Spine 79: 47–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lekpa F., Poulain C., Wendling D., Soubrier M., De Bandt M., Berthelot J., et al. (2012b) Is IL-6 an appropriate target to treat spondyloarthritis patients refractory to anti-TNF therapy? A multicenter retrospective observational study. Arthritis Res Ther 14: R53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Levy-Clarke G., Nussenblatt R. (2006) Does anti-TNF therapy decrease the incidence of anterior uveitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis? Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2: 72–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Masiero S., Bonaldo L., Pigatto M., Lo Nigro A., Ramonda R., Punzi L. (2011) Rehabilitation treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis stabilized with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol 38: 1335–1342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. McInnes I., Kavanaugh A., Gottlieb A., Puig L., Rahman P., Ritchlin C., et al. (2013) Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 1 year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled PSUMMIT 1 trial. Lancet 382: 780–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Migliore A., Broccoli S., Bizzi E., Laganà B. (2012) Indirect comparison of the effects of anti-TNF biological agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis by means of a mixed treatment comparison performed on efficacy data from published randomised, controlled trials. J Med Econ 15: 473–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Miserocchi E., Modorati G., Pontikaki I., Meroni P., Gerloni V. (2014) Long-term treatment with golimumab for severe uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 22: 90–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Néel A., Henry B., Barbarot S., Masseau A., Perrin F., Bernier C., et al. (2014) Long-term effectiveness and safety of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra) in Schnitzler’s syndrome: a French multicenter study. Autoimmun Rev 13: 1035–1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Nocturne G., Dougados M., Constantin A., Richez C., Sellam J., Simon A., et al. (2010) Rituximab in the spondyloarthropathies: data of eight patients followed up in the French Autoimmunity and Rituximab (AIR) registry. Ann Rheum Dis 69: 471–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Novelli L., Chimenti M., Chiricozzi A., Perricone R. (2014) The new era for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: perspectives and validated strategies. Autoimmun Rev 13: 64–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ogata A., Umegaki N., Katayama I., Kumanogoh A., Tanaka T. (2012) Psoriatic arthritis in two patients with an inadequate response to treatment with tocilizumab. Joint Bone Spine 79: 85–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Olivieri I., Cantini F., Castiglione F., Felice C., Gionchetti P., Orlando A., et al. (2014) Italian Expert Panel on the management of patients with coexisting spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. Autoimmun Rev 13: 822–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Olivieri I., Sarzi-Puttini P., Bugatti S., Atzeni F., d’Angelo S., Caporali R. (2012) Early treatment in early undifferentiated arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 11: 589–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Pathan E., Abraham S., Van Rossen E., Withrington R., Keat A., Charles P., et al. (2013) Efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 72: 1475–1480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Pedersen S., Weber U., Ostergaard M. (2012) The diagnostic utility of MRI in spondyloarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 26: 751–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Peluso R., Cafaro G., Di Minno A., Iervolino S., Ambrosino P., Lupoli G., et al. (2013b) Side effects of TNF-α blockers in patients with psoriatic arthritis: evidences from literature studies. Clin Rheumatol 32: 743–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Peluso R., DI Minno M., Bruner V., Soscia E., Castiglione F., Manguso F., et al. (2012) Discovertebral erosions in patients with enteropathic spondyloarthritis. J Rheumatol 39: 2332–2340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Peluso R., Di Minno M., Iervolino S., Manguso F., Tramontano G., Ambrosino P., et al. (2013a) Enteropathic spondyloarthritis: from diagnosis to treatment. Clin Dev Immunol 2013: 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Peluso R., Iervolino S., Vitiello M., Bruner V., Lupoli G., Di Minno M. (2015) Extra-articular manifestations in psoriatic arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol 34: 745–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Peters N., Ejstrup L. (1992) Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy in ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol 21: 134–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Poddubnyy D., Hermann K., Callhoff J., Listing J., Sieper J. (2014) Ustekinumab for the treatment of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: results of a 28-week, prospective, open-label, proof-of concept study (TOPAS). Ann Rheum Dis 73: 817–823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Ramiro S., Radner H., van der Heijde D., van Tubergen A., Buchbinder R., Aletaha D., et al. (2011) Combination therapy for pain management in inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, other spondyloarthritis). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10: CD008886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Raychaudhuri S., Deodhar A. (2014) The classification and diagnostic criteria of ankylosing spondylitis. J Autoimmun 48–49: 128–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Ritchlin C., Kavanaugh A., Gladman D., Mease P., Helliwell P., Boehncke W., et al. (2009) Treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 68: 1387–1394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rutgeerts P., Sandborn W., Feagan B., Reinisch W., Olson A., Johanns J., et al. (2005) Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 353: 2462–2476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sandborn W., Hanauer S., Katz S., Safdi M., Wolf D., Baerg R., et al. (2001) Etanercept for active Crohn’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Gastroenterology 121: 1088–1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sandborn W., Rutgeerts P., Enns R., Hanauer S., Colombel J., Panaccione R., et al. (2007) Adalimumab induction therapy for Crohn disease previously treated with infliximab: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 146: 829–838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Sanduzzi A., Bocchino M., Atteno M., Costa L., Ponticiello A., Matarese A., et al. (2012) Screening and monitoring of latent tubercular infection in patients taking tumor necrosis factor-α blockers for psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl 89: 82–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Scarpa R., Atteno M., Lubrano E., Provenzano G., D’Angelo S., Spadaro A., et al. (2011) The effectiveness and safety of TNF-alpha blockers in the treatment of early psoriatic arthritis: an Italian multicentre longitudinal observational pilot study. Clin Rheumatol 30: 1063–1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Scarpa R., Costa L., Atteno M., Del Puente A., Caso F., et al. (2013) Psoriatic arthritis: advances in pharmacotherapy based on molecular target. Expert Opin Pharmacother 14: 2311–2313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Scarpa R., Cuocolo A., Peluso R., Atteno M., Gisonni P., Iervolino S., et al. (2008) Early psoriatic arthritis: the clinical spectrum. J Rheumatol 35: 137–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Scarpa R., Peluso R., Atteno M. (2007) Clinical presentation of psoriatic arthritis. Reumatismo 59(Suppl. 1): 49–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Schett G., Wollenhaupt J., Papp K., Joos R., Rodrigues J., Vessey A., et al. (2012) Oral apremilast in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 64: 3156–3167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Selmi C., Gershwin M. (2014) Diagnosis and classification of reactive arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 13: 546–549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sieper J., Inman R., Badalamenti S. (2012) Sarilumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: results of a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study (ALIGN). Ann Rheum Dis 71(Suppl. 3): 111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sieper J., Lenaerts J., Wollenhaupt J., Rudwaleit M., Mazurov V., Myasoutova L., et al. (2014a) Maintenance of biologic-free remission with naproxen or no treatment in patients with early, active axial spondyloarthritis: results from a 6-month, randomised, open-label follow-up study, INFAST part 2. Ann Rheum Dis 73: 108–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Sieper J., Lenaerts J., Wollenhaupt J., Rudwaleit M., Mazurov V., Myasoutova L., et al. (2014b) Efficacy and safety of infliximab plus naproxen versus naproxen alone in patients with early, active axial spondyloarthritis: results from the double-blind, placebo-controlled INFAST study, part 1. Ann Rheum Dis 73: 101–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Sieper J., Porter-Brown B., Thompson L., Harari O., Dougados M. (2014c) Assessment of short-term symptomatic efficacy of tocilizumab in ankylosing spondylitis: results of randomised, placebo controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis 73: 95–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sieper J., van der Heijde D., Dougados M., Mease P., Maksymowych W., Brown M., et al. (2013) Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results of a randomised placebo-controlled trial (ABILITY-1). Ann Rheum Dis 72: 815–822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Song I., Appel H., Haibel H., Loddenkemper C., Braun J., Sieper J., et al. (2008) New onset of Crohn’s disease during treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with etanercept. J Rheumatol 35: 532–536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Song I., Heldmann F., Rudwaleit M., Haibel H., Weiss A., Braun J., et al. (2011) Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with abatacept: an open-label, 24-week pilot study. Ann Rheum Dis 70: 1108–1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Song I., Heldmann F., Rudwaleit M., Listing J., Appel H., Braun J., et al. (2010) Different response to rituximab in tumor necrosis factor blocker naïve patients with active ankylosing spondylitis and in patients in whom tumor necrosis factor blockers have failed: a twenty-four-week clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 62: 1290–1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Song I., Rudwaleit M. (2013) Certolizumab pegol in axial spondyloarthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 9: 1161–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Song I., Weib A., Hermann K., Haibel H., Althoff C., Poddubnyy D., et al. (2013) Similar response rates in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis after 1 year of treatment with etanercept: results from the ESTHER trial. Ann Rheum Dis 7: 823–825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Soscia E., Scarpa R., Cimmino M., Atteno M., Peluso R., Sirignano C., et al. (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of nail unit in psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl 83: 42–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Staalesen Strumse Y., Nordvåg B., Stanghelle J., Røisland M., Winther A., Pajunen P., et al. (2011) Efficacy of rehabilitation for patients with ankylosing spondylitis: comparison of a four-week rehabilitation programme in a Mediterranean and a Norwegian setting. J Rehabil Med 43: 534–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Tillett W., Costa L., Jadon D., Wallis D., Cavill C., McHugh J., et al. (2012) The ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria - a retrospective feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity study. J Rheumatol 39: 154–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. van den Berg R., Baraliakos X., Braun J., van der Heijde D. (2012) First update of the current evidence for the management of ankylosing spondylitis with non-pharmacological treatment and non-biologic drugs: a systematic literature review for the ASAS/EULAR management recommendations in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology 51: 1388–1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. van Denderen J., Visman I., Nurmohamed M., Suttorp-Schulten M., van der Horst-Bruinsma I. (2014) Adalimumab significantly reduces the recurrence rate of anterior uveitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 41: 1843–1848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. van der Horst-Bruinsma I., Nurmohamed M. (2012) Management and evaluation of extraarticular manifestations in spondyloarthritis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 4: 413–422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Wendling D. (2013) Do non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have disease-modifying effects in spondyloarthritis? Joint Bone Spine 80: 563–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wendling D., Balblanc J., Briancon D., Brousse A., Lohse A., Deprez P., et al. (2008) Onset or exacerbation of cutaneous psoriasis during TNFalpha antagonist therapy. Joint Bone Spine 75: 315–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wendling D., Dougados M., Berenbaum F., Brocq O., Schaeverbeke T., Mazieres B., et al. (2012a) Rituximab treatment for spondyloarthritis. A nationwide series: data from the AIR registry of the French Society of Rheumatology. J Rheumatol 39: 2327–2331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Wendling D., Lukas C., Paccou J., Claudepierre P., Carton L., Combe B., et al. (2014) Recommendations of the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) on the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis. Joint Bone Spine 81: 6–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wendling D., Prati C., Claudepierre P., Guillot X., Breban M. (2012b) Non-radiographic spondyloarthritis: a theoretical concept or a real entity? Joint Bone Spine 79: 531–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Woodrick R., Ruderman E. (2012) IL-6 inhibition for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other conditions. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 70: 195–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES