Abstract
Objective:
To evaluate whether diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can predict epileptogenic tubers by measuring apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity in both tubers and perituberal tissue in pediatric patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) undergoing epilepsy surgery.
Methods:
We retrospectively selected 23 consecutive patients (aged 0.4–19.6 years, mean age of 5.2; 13 female, 10 male) who underwent presurgical DTI and subsequent surgical resection between 2004 and 2013 from the University of California–Los Angeles TSC Clinic. We evaluated presurgical examinations including video-EEG, brain MRI, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET, magnetic source imaging, and intraoperative electrocorticography for determining epileptogenic tubers. A total of 545 tubers, 33 epileptogenic and 512 nonepileptogenic, were identified. Two observers generated the regions of interest (ROIs) of tubers (ROItuber), the 4-mm-thick ring-shaped ROIs surrounding the tubers (ROIperituber), and the combined ROIs (ROItuber+perituber) in consensus and calculated maximum, minimum, mean, and median values of each DTI measure in each ROI for all tubers.
Results:
The Mann–Whitney U test demonstrated that the epileptogenic group showed higher maximum ADC and radial diffusivity values in all ROIs, and that maximum ADC in ROItuber+perituber showed the strongest difference (p = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that maximum ADC measurements in ROItuber+perituber (area under curve = 0.68 ± 0.05, p < 0.001) had 81% sensitivity and 44% specificity for correctly identifying epileptogenic tubers with a cutoff value of 1.32 μm2/ms.
Conclusions:
DTI analysis of tubers and perituberal tissue may help to identify epileptogenic tubers in presurgical patients with TSC more easily and effectively than current invasive methods.
The presurgical identification of epileptogenic tubers in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) remains challenging.1 Many patients with TSC either require invasive intracranial recording to pinpoint the epileptogenic zone or are denied surgery altogether.
Recent neurophysiologic studies have revealed that not only the tuber themselves but also the adjacent perituberal tissue can impair brain function and is therefore considered part of the ictal onset zone.2,3 We hypothesized that microstructural changes in perituberal tissue may be measurable using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), an MRI technique sensitive to subvoxel microstructural orientation and density. To test this hypothesis, we measured DTI characteristics, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD), in both tubers and perituberal tissue in a group of pediatric patients with TSC, and then correlated these findings with epileptogenicity.
METHODS
Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents.
The institutional review board at the University of California–Los Angeles (UCLA) approved the use of human subjects and waived the need for written informed consent and signed patient consent-to-disclose form because all testing was deemed clinically relevant to patient care.
Ethical approval.
The current retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board at UCLA.
Patients.
We retrospectively selected 23 consecutive pediatric patients with TSC (aged 0.4–19.6 years mean age of 5.2; 13 female, 10 male) who underwent presurgical DTI and subsequent surgical resection for treatment of epilepsy between 2004 and 2013 from the UCLA TSC Clinic. Two patients underwent surgery twice because of localizable recurrent seizures, arising from adjacent to resection cavity. Patients' clinical data and seizure characteristics are summarized, respectively, in tables e-1 and e-2 on the Neurology® Web site at Neurology.org. None of the patients had a history of treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors at the time of MRI or surgery. Patients without surgical resection due to nonlateralizing or multiple independent epileptogenic zones were excluded (n = 11).
Selecting epileptogenic tubers.
All patients underwent a standardized presurgical evaluation including clinical and neurologic examinations, interictal and ictal scalp video-EEG recordings, brain MRI, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET (FDG-PET). FDG-PET/MRI coregistration4 was performed for all patients, and 18 of the patients received magnetic source imaging5 for interictal dipoles. Epileptologists, neurosurgeons, neuroradiologists, and neuropsychologists made the decisions regarding surgical candidacy by group consensus during weekly case conferences.
We reviewed these preoperative examinations and intraoperative electrocorticography to confirm epileptogenic areas. Also, we verified the specific tubers responsible for seizure activity subsequently through surgical resection and a clinically meaningful reduction in seizure activity. Since magnetic susceptibility-induced artifacts on MRI cause inaccurate DTI measurements, we excluded heavily calcified tubers from the analysis. A total of 545 tubers, consisting of 33 (6%) epileptogenic tubers and 512 (94%) nonepileptogenic tubers were identified in this study.
Neuroimaging acquisition and analysis.
We used the DTI data and other conventional magnetic resonance sequences on 1.5T Siemens Signa HDx or Genesis scanner and 3T Siemens Trio scanner (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) and processed the analysis using the freely available postprocessing software AFNI (http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni) (figure 1). Detailed magnetic resonance protocols and measures are shown in appendix e-1. Two researchers manually contoured all tubers on the ADC maps slice by slice in consensus (region of interest [ROI]tuber). Because of the low resolution of the ADC maps, we referred T2-weighted or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images overlaying on ADC maps. ROItuber was circumferentially inflated by 4 mm, such that at least 2 voxel rows were included around the tubers, to create ROItuber+perituber. Finally, original ROItuber was then subtracted from ROItuber+perituber to create the ROI of perituberal tissue (ROIperituber). Flow voids, CSF, bone, and air were manually eliminated from all ROIs. Maximum, minimum, mean, and median values of each DTI measure in each ROI were then calculated for all tubers.
Figure 1. Creating the ROIs of tuber, perituberal tissue, and combined tuber and perituberal tissue.
A 2-year-old boy with tuberous sclerosis complex. Axial T2-weighted image (A), axial T1-weighted image (B), and axial apparent diffusion coefficient map (C) showed multiple bihemispheric cortical tubers. ROI of left frontal tuber (ROItuber) was generated by manually contouring the tuber by 2 observers in consensus (D). ROItuber was automatically inflated by 4 mm to create the ROI of tuber plus perituberal tissue (ROItuber+perituber) (E). Note that the regions over CSF of ROItuber+perituber were trimmed off. ROItuber was subtracted from ROItuber+perituber to generate the ROI of perituberal tissue (ROIperituber) (F). The in-plane voxel size for DTI data in our study ranged from 0.8 × 0.8 to 1.9 × 1.9 mm. In order to include at least 2 voxel rows in the perituberal ROIs, a width of 4 mm was used. ROI = region of interest.
Statistical analysis.
We entered DTI measurements into a database and analyzed the data using SPSS Statistics, version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). A priori, results were considered significant at p < 0.05.
RESULTS
The results of the group analysis are summarized in table 1. All patients showed improvement in seizure activity postoperatively, all of which corresponded to those defined as epileptogenic on preoperative images (table e-1).
Table 1.
Comparison of ROI measurements
Epileptogenic tubers showed higher maximum ADC and RD values in all ROIs (Mann–Whitney U test; p values ≤0.03). Maximum ADC and RD were different between each ROI (Bonferroni; p < 0.001), and there was no interaction effect between ROI and epileptogenicity (2-way analysis of variance; p = 0.12) (figure e-1). Maximum AD values of epileptogenic tubers were higher in ROIperituber (Mann–Whitney U test; p = 0.03) and ROItuber+perituber (Mann–Whitney U test; p = 0.04). FA values showed no significant differences.
The results suggested that the maximum ADCs and RDs in ROItuber+perituber showed the strongest differences between epileptogenic and nonepileptogenic tubers (p = 0.001 and 0.01, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that these DTI characteristics differentiate epileptogenic tubers with high sensitivity (figure 2). In particular, maximum ADC measurements in ROItuber+perituber (ROC, area under curve = 0.68 ± 0.05, p < 0.001) demonstrated 81% sensitivity and 44% specificity for correctly identifying epileptogenic tubers with a cutoff value of 1.32 μm2/ms (figure 2A), and maximum RD measurements in ROItuber+perituber (ROC, area under curve = 0.63 ± 0.05, p = 0.01) demonstrated 84% sensitivity and 37% specificity with a cutoff value of 1.1 μm2/ms (figure 2B).
Figure 2. ROC curves for identifying epileptogenicity based on maximum ADC and maximum RD within each ROI.
ROC analysis results for (A) maximum ADC and (B) maximum RD within the tuber, perituberal tissue, and combined tuberal and perituberal tissues. Results demonstrate a high sensitivity for identifying epileptogenic tubers if maximum ADC is higher than 1.32 μm2/ms in tubers (72% sensitivity/53% specificity), perituberal tissue (59% sensitivity/62% specificity), or combined tuberal and perituberal tissue (81% sensitivity/44% specificity). Similarly, a maximum RD higher than 1.1 μm2/ms in tubers (75% sensitivity/42% specificity), perituberal tissues (68% sensitivity/50% specificity), or combined tuber and perituberal tissues (84% sensitivity/37% specificity) showed a high sensitivity for correctly identifying epileptogenic tubers. ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient; RD = radial diffusivity; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; ROI = region of interest.
DISCUSSION
The current study suggests that DTI measurements, especially maximum ADC and maximum RD, in both tuber and perituberal tissues can enhance the identification of epileptogenic tubers. Histopathologically, tubers show the presence of dysplastic neurons and giant cells, increased axonal connectivity, and hypomyelination.3 Perituberal cortex also demonstrates similar histologic features.3 Our results are therefore consistent with these histopathologic changes since dysplastic neurons and astrogliosis may result in increased ADC. Cystic degeneration of tubers also causes increased ADC, which is consistent with the notion that tubers with cystic degeneration correlate with epileptogenicity.6 It is possible that the functional isolation of the tuberal regions by cystic white matter may promote epileptogenicity. In future studies, it would be beneficial to directly analyze the relationship of imaging/DTI findings to electrocorticographic findings and histopathologic features.
In addition, hypomyelination is reported to increase RD, which is consistent with our results.7 AD changes are caused by axonal and functional changes,7 suggesting that our observed increases in AD within epileptogenic perituberal tissue may result from increased axonal connectivity and growth.3 The coexistence of both AD and RD changes have resulted in no substantial anisotropy changes, as indicated by our findings of no FA difference between epileptogenic and nonepileptogenic tubers. This result conflicts with previous studies reporting significantly lower FA values in epileptogenic tubers or in normal-appearing white matter adjacent to epileptogenic tubers compared with nonepileptogenic areas.8,9 Those studies, however, determined epileptogenicity using α-[11C]methyl-l-tryptophan ([11C]AMT)-PET8 or magnetic source imaging,9 each of which is probably insufficient for determining epileptogenicity alone. They also used small focal ROIs to measure DTI indices in normal-appearing white matter9 while we created ring-shaped ROIs covering all of the perituberal tissue simultaneously, which enabled us to reflect all of the FA changes within perituberal tissue. Consequently, we can say that the current results reflect all FA changes in perituberal tissue, and that FA change may vary according to where in the perituberal area the FA values were measured. In addition, it is well known that the major white matter tracts, including the internal capsule and corpus callosum, show significant FA decrease in patients with TSC compared with those in normal subjects.10 Concordant with our results, epileptogenic activity may cause more severe FA decrease in the hemisphere with epileptogenic tubers.
Limitations of this study include its retrospective design, and exclusion of patients who have not undergone surgical resection. Despite these limitations, this study demonstrates that DTI analysis of tuber and perituberal tissue may help identify epileptogenic tubers in patients with TSC noninvasively. Because this is a preliminary study, this method has not yet been adopted clinically. Further evaluation with a larger sample may help identify epileptogenic tubers noninvasively.
Supplementary Material
GLOSSARY
- AD
axial diffusivity
- ADC
apparent diffusion coefficient
- DTI
diffusion tensor imaging
- FA
fractional anisotropy
- FDG-PET
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET
- RD
radial diffusivity
- ROC
receiver operating characteristic
- ROI
region of interest
- TSC
tuberous sclerosis complex
- UCLA
University of California–Los Angeles
Footnotes
Supplemental data at Neurology.org
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Drs. Yogi, Hirata, Salamon, and Mathern designed the study and drafted the manuscript. Drs. Yogi, Hirata, Karavaeva, Ellingson, and Salamon and Mr. Harris processed the image analyses. Drs. Yogi, Hirata, Wu, and Salamon and Ms. Yudovin collected and evaluated clinical data. Drs. Yogi, Ellingson, and Salamon processed the statistical analysis and reviewed the results. All authors reviewed the study design and edited the manuscript.
STUDY FUNDING
Dr. Mathern was partly supported by Thomas P. and Nadia Q. Davies Chair in honor of Paul H. Crandall, MD, for Epilepsy Research.
DISCLOSURE
A. Yogi, Y. Hirata, E. Karavaeva, and R. Harris report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. J. Wu serves on the professional advisory board for the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance; has received honoraria from and serves on the scientific advisory board and the speakers bureau for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Lundbeck; and has received research support from the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Today's and Tomorrow's Children Fund, Department of Defense/Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program, and the NIH (U01NS082320, P20NS080199, R01NS082649, and U54NS092090). S. Yudovin, M. Linetsky, G. Mathern, B. Ellingson, and N. Salamon report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.
REFERENCES
- 1.Wu JY, Salamon N, Kirsch HE, et al. Noninvasive testing, early surgery, and seizure freedom in tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurology 2010;74:392–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Major P, Rakowski S, Simon MV, et al. Are cortical tubers epileptogenic? Evidence from electrocorticography. Epilepsia 2009;50:147–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ruppe V, Dilsiz P, Reiss CS, et al. Developmental brain abnormalities in tuberous sclerosis complex: a comparative tissue analysis of cortical tubers and perituberal cortex. Epilepsia 2014;55:539–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chandra PS, Salamon N, Huang J, et al. FDG-PET/MRI coregistration and diffusion-tensor imaging distinguish epileptogenic tubers and cortex in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: a preliminary report. Epilepsia 2006;47:1543–1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wu JY, Sutherling WW, Koh S, et al. Magnetic source imaging localizes epileptogenic zone in children with tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurology 2006;66:1270–1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gallagher A, Grant EP, Madan N, Jarrett DY, Lyczkowski DA, Thiele EA. MRI findings reveal three different types of tubers in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. J Neurol 2010;257:1373–1381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Cercignani M. About “axial” and “radial” diffusivities. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:1255–1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tiwari VN, Kumar A, Chakraborty PK, Chugani HT. Can diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) identify epileptogenic tubers in tuberous sclerosis complex? Correlation with α-[11C]methyl-L-tryptophan ([11C] AMT) positron emission tomography (PET). J Child Neurol 2012;27:598–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Widjaja E, Simao G, Mahmoodabadi SZ, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging identifies changes in normal-appearing white matter within the epileptogenic zone in tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsy Res 2010;89:246–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Makki MI, Chugani DC, Janisse J, Chugani HT. Characteristics of abnormal diffusivity in normal-appearing white matter investigated with diffusion tensor MR imaging in tuberous sclerosis complex. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1662–1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.