Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Meta Gene logoLink to Meta Gene
. 2016 Jun 17;9:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2016.06.003

Polymorphisms of apolipoprotein E and aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: A meta-analysis

S Arati a, MK Sibin a, Dhananjaya I Bhat b, KVL Narasingarao b, GK Chetan a,⁎
PMCID: PMC4925774  PMID: 27408823

Abstract

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is characterised by bleeding in the subarachnoid space in the brain. There are various polymorphisms in genes which are associated with this disease. We performed a systematic meta- analysis to investigate the relationship of APOE polymorphism on aSAH. A comprehensive literature search was done in the Pubmed database, Science Direct, Cochrane library and Google Scholar. The OR and 95% CI were evaluated for the gene and aSAH association using fixed and random effect models. Publication bias was assessed using Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test. All statistical evaluations were done using the software Review Manager 5.0 and Comprehensive Meta Analysis v2.2.023. A total of 9 studies were assessed on APOE polymorphism (1100 Cases, 2732 Control). Meta analysis results showed significant association in ε2/ ε2 versus ε3/ε3, ε2 versus ε3 genetic models and ε2 allele frequency. In subgroup analysis statistically significant association was observed in Asians in the genetic models ε2/ ε2 versus ε3/ε3, ε2/ε3 versus ε3/ε3, ε2 versus ε3 and also in ε2 allele frequency. However, in Caucasian population only ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3 genetic model showed significant association between APOE and risk of aSAH. In this meta-analysis study, the ε2/ε2 genotype is associated with increased risk of aSAH.

Keywords: Apolipoprotein E, Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, Meta- analysis, Polymorphism

1. Introduction

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is a pathological condition characterised by bleeding into the subarachnoid space which is the area between the arachnoid membrane and the pia mater surrounding the brain (Suarez et al., 2006).SAH is mainly caused by three reasons, rupture of a cerebral arterial aneurysm, an arterial-venous malformation, or head trauma (Ruigrok et al., 2005). An aneurysm is a localized bulge in the wall of an artery (Raya and Diringer, 2014). Risk factors of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) include hypertension, smoking, female gender and heavy alcohol intake (Feigin et al., 2005). In addition, studies have also shown the importance of genetic factors caused by polymorphisms in the pathogenesis of aSAH (Woo et al., 2002). Though there is surgical and medical progress, the treatment of aSAH remains unpredictable and cause high rate of mortality, especially in WFNS grade III and IV (Al Shahi et al., 2006).

The association between apolipoprotein E (APOE) and neurocognitive outcomes after SAH has been investigated in many studies on different population. APOE protein combines with lipids to form lipoprotein particles which are involved in the metabolism and transport of lipids in the central nervous system (Mahley and Rall, 2000. In humans, APOE gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 19 at position q13.2. APOE is a polymorphic gene with three major alleles (ε2, ε3 ε4) coding for three isoforms of proteins (E2, E3, E4), which differ on the 112th and 158th amino acid position with cysteine and arginine interchange (Csajbok et al., 2015). The three allelic variants of APOE are defined by two SNPs, rs7412 and rs429358 (Yuan et al., 2015). The six possible genotypes of APOE were derived from the combination of polymorphisms rs7412 and rs429358. The C allele at both SNPs constitutes ε4 allele and T allele at both SNPs constitutes ε2 allele. The C allele at rs7412 and T allele at rs429358 identify ε3 allele (Radmanesh et al., 2014).

The presence of the ε4 allele is known to be associated with increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (Strittmatter et al., 1994), poor outcomes after traumatic brain injury (Teasdale et al., 2005) and intracerebral haemorrhage (Alberts et al., 1995). APOE polymorphism could also contribute to the progression of atherosclerosis by affecting the serum levels of cholesterol and triglyceride (Chalouhi et al., 2012). Association between the APOE polymorphism and risk of aSAH has been investigated in several studies but the results were conflicting. To resolve this question, a systematic meta-analysis was performed to verify the association between APOE gene polymorphisms and the risk of aSAH.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Search strategy

We searched all published studies in the Pubmed database, Science Direct, Cochrane library and Google Scholar using the following combination of keywords: “Apolipoprotein E” or “APOE”, “APOE Polymorphism”, “Subarachnoid haemorrhage”, “APOE polymorphism and aSAH”, “Single nucleotide polymorphism”, “Allele Variation/genotype”. The data source for this study was obtained from literature published up to March2016.

2.2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for the selected articles were as follows: (1) case–control study, (2) reports on the association between APOE polymorphisms and aSAH (3) studies with full text articles, and (4) the studies which confirm aSAH by lumbar puncture/CT scanning/conventional angiography. The exclusion criteria for the selected articles were as follows: case reports, systemic reviews, data on genotype frequency was not reported , clinical trials, meta analysis, in vitro studies, articles which are not written in English.

2.3. Data extraction

The following information was extracted from each included article: first author, year of publication, country, ethnicity, source of controls, genotyping method, total numbers of aSAH cases and controls and distribution of genotypes and alleles in aSAH cases and controls (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of all eligible studies and distribution of Apo E genotype of cases and controls included in the meta-analysis.

First Author(Year)
 Country
 Ethnicity
 Source
 Genotyping Method
 No: of Cases/Control
 Genotype for Cases/Controls
 Allele for Cases/Controls
 HW-Ea
 References
ε2/ε2 ε2/ε3 ε2/ε4 ε3/ε3 ε3/ε4 ε4/ε4 ε2 ε3 ε4 P Value
McCarron et al. (1998) UK Caucasians HBc PCR_RFLP 96/406 2/4 48/222 4/12 8/45 5/13 29/ 110 56/66 69/ 325 67/ 245 0.76 McCarron et al. (1998)
Kokubo et al. (2000) Japan Asian HBc PCR_RFLP 37/1126 1/11 2/73 0/8 21/ 819 11/ 202 2/13 4/103 55/1913 15/ 236 / Kokubo et al. (2000)
Tang et al. (2003) China Asian HBc PCR-RFLP 104/123 0/2 17/13 2/2 69/89 15/17 1/0 19/19 170/208 19/19 0.29 Tang et al. (2003)
Yamada et al. (2004) Japan Asian HBc PCR_RFLP 100/100 NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb 8/7 171/ 164 21/29 NAb Yamada et al. (2004)
Kaushal et al. (2006) USA Caucasians HBc Taq man assay 107/202 0/1 10/32 1/2 61/97 20/46 2/6 11/36 152/ 272 25/60 0.22 Kaushal et al. (2006)
Mineharu et al. (2006) Japan Asian HBc PCR_RFLP 362/332 NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb 13/13 44/38 305/ 280 NAb Mineharu et al. (2006)
Fontanella et al. (2007) Italy Caucasians HBc PCR-RFLP 146/222 6/1 17/28 1/0 107/161 15/31 0/1 30/30 246/ 381 16/33 0.43 Fontanella et al. (2007)
Csajbok et al. (2015) Sweden Caucasians HBc Taq man assay 148/221 NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb 46/68 NAb Csajbok et al. (2015)
Liu et al. (2016) China Asian HBc PCR-RFLP 150/150 9/1 35/21 4/7 76/80 25/31 1/10 57/30 212/ 212 31/58 0.08 Liu et al. (2016)
Open in a new tab
a

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.

b

Data not given.

c

Hospital Based.

2.4. Statistical analysis

The data were evaluated using the software Review Manager (Version 5.0, Cochrane Collaboration) and Comprehensive Meta Analysis v2.2.023. Genotype ε3/ε3 was assigned as the reference group in our study. For APOE gene the genotype frequencies for ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3, ε2/ε3 versus ε3/ε3, ε2/ε4 versus ε3/ε3, ε3/ε4 versus ε3/ε3, ε4/ε4 versus ε3/ε3, allele ε2 versus allele ε3, and allele ε4 versus allele ε3 were analyzed. The allele frequencies were also analyzed for ε2, ε3 and ε4. The genetic association and risk of aSAH was calculated using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The test for heterogeneity was calculated by Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. For Q test, P value < 0.10 was considered as significant for heterogeneity among the studies. The I2 value represents the percentage of total variation across the studies due to heterogeneity. I2 values of 25%, 50% and 75% were considered as low, moderate, and high heterogeneity. When there was significant heterogeneity, we use random effect model to pool the results. Odds ratios were calculated with either fixed effects model (MantelHaenszel method) or random effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method) according to the heterogeneity (Mantel and William, 1959). Fixed effect model was applied when there was no heterogeneity; otherwise random effect model was applied (DerSimonian and Laird, 1986). The publication bias was assessed by Begg's funnel plot, and Egger's regression tests for ≥ 3 publications (Begg and Mazumdar, 1994, Egger et al., 1997). The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was determined based on the control genotyping results. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was analyzed with the online software (https://ihg.gsf.de/cgi-bin/hw/hwa1.pl). ε3/ε3 genotype is the wild type homozygote genotype for APOE gene, while ε4/ε4 and ε2/ε2 are the rare homozygous genotypes. The heterozygous genotypes for APOE gene are ε2/ε3, ε2/ε4 and ε3/ε4.

3. Results

3.1. Study characteristics

A total of 809 studies were reviewed based on our selection strategy. The step wise selection process in this meta analysis is mentioned in [Fig. 1]. A total of 9 potentially relevant studies (Csajbok et al., 2015, Fontanella et al., 2007, Kaushal et al., 2006, Kokubo et al., 2000, Liu et al., 2016, McCarron and Nicoll, 1998, Mineharu et al., 2006, Tang et al., 2003, Yamada et al., 2004) met the inclusion criteria. Studies were carried out in China, Japan, Italy, UK, USA, Sweden, Netherlands and Spain. Genotyping methods included in the studies were PCR-RFLP and Taqman assay. Detailed characteristics of the studies including allele and genotype frequencies of APOE in this meta analysis are mentioned in Table 1. The HWE was assessed on the genotype distribution of the controls in all included studies (PHWE > 0.05).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Flow diagram of study selection.

3.2. Association of APOE polymorphism and aSAH

Nine studies were identified that evaluated the association of APOE polymorphism with the risk of aSAH. OR with 95% CI for the seven genetic models and allele frequencies for ε2, ε3, ε4 was assessed. The association between APOE polymorphisms and the risk of aSAH was statistically significant in the genetic models of ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3 [OR = 3.30, 95% CI = 1.48–7.37, P = 0.004] (Fig. 2) and ε2 versus ε3 [OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.00–1.59, P = 0.05] (Fig. 2). The association was also seen statistically significant in ε2 allele frequency [OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.02–1.60, P = 0.03] (Fig. 2). In our meta analysis ε4 allele frequency [OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.69–1.18, P = 0.44] (Fig. 2) showed no significant association with the risk on aSAH. The results of meta analysis are summarized in Table 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Forest plots of OR with 95% CI for the association of APOE polymorphisms and aSAH risk in the genetic model (A) ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3 (B) ε2 versus ε3 (C) ε2 allele frequency (D) ε4 allele frequency.

Table 2.

Summary of data of genes and their polymorphisms investigated and their odds ratio with 95%.

SL no Gene
 Overall/subgroup Fixed effects OR (95%CI) Random effects OR (95% CI) I2 for heterogeneity (%) P value for heterogeneity P value for Z test
ApoE
1 ε2 ε2 vs ε3 ε3 All 3.30 [1.48.7.37] 3.14 [1.15.8.58] 14 0.33 0.004
Asian 3.09 [1.01.9.47] 2.71 [0.43.17.7] 45 0.16 0.05
Caucasian 3.55 [1.12.11.3] 3.25 [0.85.12.2] 7 0.34 0.03
2 ε2 ε3 vs ε3ε3 All 1.05 [0.78.1.43] 1.05 [0.69.1.58] 38 0.15 0.74
Asian 1.65 [1.04.2.61] 1.65 [1.03.2.62] 0 0.83 0.03
Caucasian 0.73 [0.48.1.12] 0.74 [0.48.1.13] 0 0.48 0.15
3 ε2 ε4 vs ε3 ε3 All 1.20 [0.61.2.37] 1.24 [0.62.2.45] 0 0.76 0.60
Asian 0.82 [0.30.2.25] 0.86 [0.31.2.33] 0 0.64 0.70
Caucasian 1.71 [0.68.4.32] 1.71 [0.67.4.37] 0 0.69 0.25
4 ε4 ε4 vs ε3 ε3 All 0.92 [0.52.1.62] 1.05 [0.33.3.35] 60 0.03 0.93
Asian 0.63 [0.23.1.75] 1.31 [0.06.29.7] 84 0.002 0.87
Caucasian 1.12 [0.55.2.26] 1.13 [0.54.2.37] 0 0.48 0.75
5 ε3 ε4 vs ε3 ε3 All 1.00 [0.77.1.29] 1.02 [0.74.1.39] 30 0.21 0.98
Asian 1.17 [0.78.1.76] 1.23 [0.72.2.11] 43 0.17 0.44
Caucasian 0.89 [0.64.1.25] 0.89 [0.61.1.29] 18 0.30 0.51
6 ε2 vs ε3 All 1.26 [1.00.1.59] 1.23 [0.93.1.64] 28 0.21 0.05
Asian 1.46 [1.06.2.02] 1.46 [1.06.2.01] 0 0.58 0.02
Caucasian 1.07 [0.77.1.49] 1.03 [0.59.1.82] 63 0.07 0.69
7 ε4 vs ε3 All 0.95 [0.79.1.14] 0.98 [0.71.1.35] 67 0.004 0.89
Asian 0.93 [0.73.1.18] 1.03 [0.62.1.72] 77 0.002 0.91
Caucasian 0.97 [0.74.1.28] 0.94 [0.64.1.39] 46 0.16 0.75
8 ε2 allele frequency All 1.28 [1.02.1.60] 1.23 [0.91.1.67] 39 0.12 0.03
Asian 1.51 [1.11.2.06] 1.49 [1.09.2.06] 2 0.40 0.009
Caucasian 1.06 [0.76.1.47] 1.02 [0.58.1.81] 64 0.06 0.73
9 ε3 allele frequency All 0.94 [0.81.1.09] 0.93 [0.78.1.11] 27 0.21 0.42
Asian 0.94 [0.76.1.15] 0.91 [0.69.1.20] 43 0.15 0.53
Caucasian 0.95 [0.77.1.17] 0.94 [0.74.1.20] 21 0.28 0.62
10 ε4 allele frequency All 0.83 [0.72.0.95] 0.90 [0.69.1.18] 67 0.002 0.44
Asian 0.76 [0.64.0.91] 0.88 [0.56.1.38] 78 0.001 0.58
Caucasian 0.98 [0.77.1.24] 0.97 [0.74.1.27] 19 0.30 0.84
Open in a new tab

P value less than 0.05 is represented as bold figures in the table.

Furthermore in the subgroup analysis the association between APOE polymorphisms and the risk of aSAH were statistically significant in Asians in the genetic models ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3 [OR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.01–9.47, P = 0.05] (Fig. 3), ε2/ε3 versus ε3/ε3 [OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.04–2.61, P = 0.03] (Fig. 3) and ε2 versus ε3 [OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.06–2.02, P = 0.02] (Fig. 3). The ε2 allele frequency also showed statistical significance in the Asian population [OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.11–2.06 P = 0.009] (Fig. 3). In Caucasian population only ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3 genetic model showed significant association [OR = 3.55, 95% CI = 1.12–11.3, P = 0.03] (Fig. 3). No other genetic models in Asians and Caucasians showed a significant association between the APOE and aSAH. The results of subgroup analysis are summarized in Table 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Forest plots of OR with 95%CI in the subgroup analysis for the association of APOE polymorphisms and aSAH risk in the genetic model (A) ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3[Asian] (B) ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3[Caucasian] (C) ε2/ε3 versus ε3/ε3[Asian] (D) ε2 versus ε3[Asian] (E) ε2 allele frequency[Asian].

3.3. Publication bias

Publication bias was assessed by Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test for APOE. The genetic models of ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3 [P = 0.21] (Supplementary Fig. 1), ε2 allele versus ε3 allele [P = 0.66] (Supplementary Fig. 1), ε2/ε3 versus ε3/ε3 [P = 0.88], ε4/ε4 versus ε3/ε3[P = 0.91], ε3/ε4 versus ε3/ε3 [P = 0.74], ε2/ε4 versus ε3/ε3 [P = 0.87], ε2 allele versus ε3 allele [P = 0.66] (Supplementary Fig. 1), ε4 allele versus ε3 allele [P = 0.89], ε2 allele frequency [P = 0.58] (Supplementary Fig. 1), ε3 allele frequency [P = 0.23] and ε4 allele frequency [P = 0.93] (Supplementary Fig. 1), showed no significant publication bias. No significant publication bias was seen in all genetic models.

3.4. Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the source of heterogeneity and also to find out the stability and reliability of the present study by sequentially omitting each individual studies. The results showed that none of the individual studies altered the pooled odds ratio of all genetic models (Supplementary Fig. 2). However after excluding the study done by Kokubo et al., and Liu et al., we found no evidence of heterogeneity in the genetic models such as ε4ε4 versus ε3ε3 (P = 0.57; I2 = 0%), ε4 versus ε3 (P = 0.20; I2 = 32%) and ε4 allele frequency (P = 0.36; I2 = 3%) in Asian population. In Caucasians after omitting the study done by Ritesh et al., no evidence of heterogeneity was observed in the genetic models such as ε2 versus ε3(P = 0.47; I2 = 0%) and ε2 allele frequency (P = 0.35; I2 = 0%).

4. Discussion

aSAH is a critical clinical problem with less chances of patient recovery and survival even after surgical management and medication. Development of personalized therapy might show significant improvement in the management of this clinical problem. Discovery of the effect of gene polymorphisms in the course of treatment show hope in the field of personalized therapies. APOE polymorphism is one among them and it has been shown in various studies that it is associated with risk of aSAH in different populations. In order to make a conclusion about the role of this polymorphism with the risk of aSAH, we performed a meta-analysis using nine previously published case–control studies.

APOE protein is expressed mainly in endothelial cells of arterial walls both in normal and aneurysmal arteries (Rinkel, 2008). The APOE plays an important role in maintaining lipid homeostasis in central nervous system (Gong et al., 2002), neuronal repair (Buttini et al., 1999), maintaining synaptic plasticity (Nathan et al., 1994), neuronal migration and differentiation (Bellosta et al., 1995), mitochondrial damage due to oxidative stress (Gibson et al., 2000), cerebral glucose metabolism (Reiman et al., 2004). The APOE gene polymorphism is associated with the risk of developing many central nervous system disorders. APOE polymorphism has been recognized as a genetic risk factor for the development of Alzheimer's disease in different populations (Achouri-Rassas et al., 2015, Kumar et al., 2015, Zheng et al., 2016). In Chinese population, APOE polymorphism is associated with the risk of developing deep venous thrombosis (Zhu et al., 2014). Various meta-analysis data showed that APOE polymorphism is associated with risk of fronto-temporal lobar degeneration (Rubino et al., 2013), vascular dementia (Yin et al., 2012a, Yin et al., 2012b), hypertension (Stoumpos et al., 2013), multiple sclerosis (Yin et al., 2012a, Yin et al., 2012b), Myocardial Infarction (Xu et al., 2014) and cerebral infraction (Wang et al., 2013).

The exact molecular mechanism of APOE polymorphism and risk of aSAH still remains unclear. The presence of ε4 and ε2 alleles increases the risk of delayed ischemic neurologic deficit (DIND) for aSAH patients (Lanterna et al., 2005). Studies showed that individuals with ε4 allele have increased deposition of amyloid β-protein (Aβ) in the brain parenchyma compared to individuals with other APOE polymorphism (Kaushal et al., 2006, Qiu et al., 2015). Proposed model for the formation of aneurysm suggests that atherosclerosis was a common pathological feature (Chalouhi et al., 2012). Compared with ε3 homozygote, ε4 allele and ε2 allele carriers have higher circulating low density lipoprotein cholesterol (Davignon, 2005) which suggests that ε4 and ε2 alleles may have more chances of developing atherosclerosis and thereby causing aSAH.

Previously three different meta analysis investigated the association of APOE polymorphism and outcome in patients with aSAH. Lanterna et al., conducted a meta analysis on eight case control studies to investigate the association of ε4 allele and negative outcome after SAH (Lanterna et al., 2007). The study also investigated the association between the ε4 allele and delayed ischemia which is a major complication of SAH. They found that the ε4 allele was associated with a higher risk of a negative outcome and delayed ischemia. Martinez-Gonzalez et al., conducted meta analysis on five case control studies, that showed association of ε4allele and negative outcome after aSAH (Martinez-Gonzalez and Sudlow, 2006). The third study conducted by Sudlow et al., on three case control studies showed that ε4 allele has a significant association with the risk of SAH (Sudlow et al., 2006). Among these three studies only Sudlow et al., showed the association of APOE polymorphism and risk of SAH while other two studies showed association with patient's outcome after SAH. These studies evaluated only ε4 allele and did not consider the other genetic models of APOE. In our research, we performed an updated meta analysis including all the seven genetic models and three allele frequency of APOE to establish the role of APOE polymorphism and risk of aSAH.

In our meta analysis ε4 allele showed no significant association between APOE polymorphism and the risk of aSAH as shown in previous studies. Similarly we did not find any correlation between APOE and aSAH in any other genetic models. However, our study showed significant association between APOE polymorphism and the risk of aSAH in the genetic model ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3 and ε2 versus ε3. The ε2 allele frequency also showed significant association between APOE polymorphism and risk of aSAH. In our study we found significant heterogeneity in three genetic models ε4ε4 versus ε3ε3, ε4 versus ε3 and ε4 allele frequency. Since the subjects in the study were included from different populations there was a possibility for genetic heterogeneity. To eliminate heterogeneity we conducted sub group analysis based on ethnicity and used random effect model to pool the results whenever significant heterogeneity was present. The results showed no heterogeneity in majority of genetic models except in the models such as ε4ε4 versus ε3ε3, ε4 versus ε3 and ε4 allele frequency in Asian population. In Caucasian population, ε2 versus ε3 model and ε2 allele frequency showed heterogeneity. The main factors that may lead to heterogeneity are sample size, diversity in study design, inclusion criteria, genotyping method and the genotype distribution of controls which were not in agreement with HWE. In addition, environmental exposure and diet can cause heterogeneity (Daly and Day, 2001, Ioannidis et al., 2008). Our sensitivity analysis suggested that the inclusion of studies conducted by Kokubo et al., and Liu et al., (Kokubo et al., 2000, Liu et al., 2016) contributed to heterogeneity in Asian population and Kaushal et al., (Kaushal et al., 2006) in Caucasian population.

Our study has few limitations that should be considered. Firstly, our meta-analysis included studies with accessible full-text articles in English only. Therefore, the missing of other eligible studies that were reported in other languages could lead to unavoidable publication bias in the result. Secondly, due to the limited sample size included in this study, it was hardly possible for us to perform other subgroup analysis. Despite these limitations our study has certain advantages. Firstly, the procedural issues in meta-analysis, such as heterogeneity, publication bias, and the stability of the results were well investigated. Secondly, our results were robust because the results of the sensitivity analysis were not altered and hence the conclusion remained the same.

In conclusion, the pooled data showed significant association between APOE genotype and risk of aSAH in ε2 allele not in ε4 allele. Only few studies have been conducted to address the association between APOE polymorphisms and the risk of aSAH. There are potential opportunities to perform further studies and prove the conclusions arrived at through the investigations.

The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Supplementary Fig. 1

Funnel plot of APOE polymorphism and aSAH risk in the genetic model (A) ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3 (B) ε2 versus ε3 (C) ε2 allele frequency (D) ε4 allele frequency.

mmc1.doc (50.5KB, doc)
Supplementary Fig. 2

Sensitivity analysis of APOE polymorphism and aSAH risk in the genetic models (A) ε4 versus ε3 (B) ε2allele frequency (C) ε4 allele frequency.

mmc2.doc (404.5KB, doc)

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist on the materials or methods used in this study and findings specified in this paper.

Acknowledgements

Arati S acknowledges Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India for providing Women Scientist fellowship.

References

  1. Achouri-Rassas A., Ali N.B., Cherif A., Fray S., Siala H., Zakraoui N.O., Messaoud T. Association between ACE polymorphism, cognitive phenotype and APOE E4 allele in a Tunisian population with Alzheimer disease. J. Neural Transm. 2015;1:5. doi: 10.1007/s00702-015-1468-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Shahi R., White P.M., Davenport R.J., Lindsay K.W. Subarachnoid haemorrhage. BMJ. 2006;333:235. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7561.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alberts M., Graffagnino C., McClenny C., DeLong D., Strittmatter W., Saunders A., Roses A. ApoE genotype and survival from intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet. 1995;346:575–578. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91411-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Begg C.B., Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;1:1088–1101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bellosta S., Nathan B.P., Orth M., Dong L.M., Mahley R.W., Pitas R.E. Stable expression and secretion of apolipoproteins E3 and E4 in mouse neuroblastoma cells produces differential effects on neurite outgrowth. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:27063–27071. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.45.27063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buttini M., Orth M., Bellosta S., Akeefe H., Pitas R.E., Wyss-Coray T. Expression of human apolipoprotein E3 or E4 in the brains of Apoe −/− mice: isoform-specific effects on neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 1999;19:4867–4880. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-12-04867.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chalouhi N., Ali M.S., Jabbour P.M., Tjoumakaris S.I., Gonzalez L.F., Rosenwasser R.H., Dumont A.S. Biology of intracranial aneurysms: role of inflammation. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:1659–1676. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Csajbok L.Z., Nylén K., Öst M., Blennow K., Zetterberg H., Nellgård P., Nellgård B. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in West Sweden. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2015 doi: 10.1111/ane.12487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Daly A.K., Day C.P. Candidate gene case-control association studies: advantages and potential pitfalls. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2001;52:489–499. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01510.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davignon J. Apolipoprotein E and atherosclerosis beyond lipid effect. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005;25:267–269. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000154570.50696.2c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials. 1986;7:177–188. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Egger M., Smith G.D., Schneider M., Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. Br. Med. J. 1997;315:629–634. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Feigin V.L., Rinkel G.J., Lawes C.M., Algra A., Bennett D.A., Van G.J., Anderson C.S. Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage an updated systematic review of epidemiological studies. Stroke. 2005;36:2773–2780. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000190838.02954.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fontanella M., Rainero I., Gallone S., Rubino E., Rivoiro C., Valfrè W., Pinessi L. Lack of association between the apolipoprotein E gene and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in an Italian population. J. Neurosurg. 2007;106:245–249. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.2.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gibson G.E., Haroutunian V., Zhang H., Park L.C., Shi Q., Lesser M. Mitochondrial damage in Alzheimer's disease varies with apolipoprotein Egenotype. Ann. Neurol. 2000;48:297–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gong J.S., Kobayashi M., Hayashi H., Zou K., Sawamura N., Fujita S.C. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) isoform-dependent lipid release from astrocytes prepared from human ApoE3 and ApoE4 knock-in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:29919–29926. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203934200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ioannidis J.P., Boffetta P., Little J., O'Brien T.R., Uitterlinden A.G. Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2008;37:120–132. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaushal R., Woo D., Pal P., Haverbusch M., Xi H., Moomaw C., Deka R. Subarachnoid hemorrhage: tests of association with apolipoprotein E and elastin genes. BMC Med. Genet. 2006;8:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-8-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kokubo Y., Chowdhury A.H., Date C., Yokoyama T., Sobue H., Tanaka H. Age-dependent association of apolipoprotein E genotypes with stroke subtypes in a Japanese rural population. Stroke. 2000;31:299–1306. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.6.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar N.T., Liestol K., Loberg E.M., Reims H.M., Mahlen J. Apolipoprotein E allelotype is associated with neuropathological findings in Alzheimer's disease. Virchows Arch. 2015;467:225–235. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1772-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lanterna L.A., Rigoldi M., Tredici G., Biroli F., Cesana C., Gaini S.M., Dalpra L. APOE influences vasospasm and cognition of noncomatose patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 2005;64:1238–1244. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000156523.77347.B4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lanterna L.A., Ruigrok Y., Alexander S., Tang J., Biroli F., Dunn L.T., Poon W.S. Meta-analysis of APOE genotype and subarachnoid hemorrhage clinical outcome and delayed ischemia. Neurology. 2007;69:766–775. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000267640.03300.6b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu H., Mao P., Xie C., Xie W., Wang M., Jiang H. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and the risk of intracranial aneurysms in a Chinese population. BMC Neurol. 2016;16 doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0537-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mahley R.W., Rall S.C., Jr. Apolipoprotein E: far more than a lipid transport protein. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2000;1:507–537. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mantel N., William H. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Martinez-Gonzalez N.A., Sudlow C.L. Effects of apolipoprotein E genotype on outcome after ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2006;77:1329–1335. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.097543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McCarron M.O., Nicoll J.A. High frequency of apolipoprotein E ϵ2 allele is specific for patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related haemorrhage. Neurosci. Lett. 1998;247:45–48. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00286-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mineharu Y., Inoue K., Inoue S., Yamada S., Nozaki K., Takenaka K., Koizumi A. Association analysis of common variants of ELN, NOS2A, APOE and ACE2 to intracranial aneurysm. Stroke. 2006;37:1189–1194. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000217408.91389.4d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nathan B.P., Bellosta S., Sanan D.A., Weisgraber K.H., Mahley R.W., Pitas R.E. Differential effects of apolipoproteins E3 and E4 on neuronal growth invitro. Science. 1994;264:850–852. doi: 10.1126/science.8171342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Qiu W.Q., Zhu H., Dean M., Liu Z., Vu L., Fan G., Au R. Amyloid-associated depression and ApoE4 allele: longitudinal follow-up for the development of Alzheimer's disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2015;13:10–24. doi: 10.1002/gps.4339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Radmanesh F., Devan W.J., Anderson C.D., Rosand J., Falcone G.J. Accuracy of imputation to infer unobserved APOE epsilon alleles in genome-wide genotyping data. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014;22:1239–1242. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Raya A.K., Diringer M.N. Treatment of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Crit. Care Clin. 2014;30:719–733. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2014.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Reiman E.M., Chen K., Alexander G.E., Caselli R.J., Bandy D., Osborne D. Functional brain abnormalities in young adults at genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer's dementia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004;101:284–289. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2635903100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rinkel G.J.E. Natural history, epidemiology and screening of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Rev. Neurol. 2008;164:781–786. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2008.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rubino E., Vacca A., Govone F., De Martino P., Pinessi L., Rainero I. Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:706–713. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ruigrok Y.M., Rinkel G.J., Wijmenga C. Genetics of intracranial aneurysms. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:179–189. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)01015-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stoumpos S., Hamodrakas S.J., Anthopoulos P.G., Bagos P.G. The association between apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms and essential hypertension: a meta-analysis of 45 studies including 13,940 cases and 16,364 controls. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2013;27:245–255. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2012.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Strittmatter W.J., Weisgraber K.H., Goedert M., Saunders A.M., Huang D., Corder E.H., Roses A.D. Hypothesis: microtubule instability and paired helical filament formation in the Alzheimer disease brain are related to apolipoprotein E genotype. Exp. Nephrol. 1994;125:163–171. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1994.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Suarez J.I., Tarr R.W., Selman W.R. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354:387–396. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sudlow C., González N.A.M., Kim J., Clark C. Does apolipoprotein E genotype influence the risk of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage? Systematic review and meta-analyses of 31 studies among 5961 cases and 17,965 controls. Stroke. 2006;37:364–370. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000199065.12908.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tang J., Zhao J., Zhao Y., Wang S., Chen B., Zeng W. Apolipoprotein e ϵ4 and the risk of unfavorable outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg. Neurol. 2003;60:391–396. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00323-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Teasdale G.M., Murray G.D., Nicoll J.A.R. The association between APOE ε4, age and outcome after head injury: a prospective cohort study. Brain. 2005;128:2556–2561. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang Q.Y., Wang W.J., Wu L., Liu L., Han L.Z. Meta-analysis of APOE epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 polymorphism and cerebral infarction. J. Neural Transm. 2013;120:1479–1489. doi: 10.1007/s00702-013-1019-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Woo D., Sauerbeck L.R., Kissela B.M., Khoury J.C., Szaflarski J.P., Gebel J., Deka R. Genetic and environmental risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage: preliminary results of a population-based study. Stroke. 2002;33:1190–1196. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000014774.88027.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Xu H., Li H., Liu J., Zhu D., Wang Z., Chen A., Zhao Q. Meta-analysis of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and susceptibility of myocardial infarction. PloS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yamada S., Utsunomiya M., Inoue K., Nozaki K., Inoue S., Takenaka K., Koizumi A. Genome-wide scan for Japanese familial intracranial aneurysms linkage to several chromosomal regions. Circ. Res. 2004;110:3727–3733. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143077.23367.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yin Y.W., Li J.C., Wang J.Z., Li B.H., Pi Y., Yang Q.W. Association between apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and the risk ofvascular dementia: a meta-analysis. Neurosci. Lett. 2012;514:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yin Y.W., Zhang Y.D., Wang J.Z., Li B.H., Yang Q.W., Fang C.Q. Association between apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis of 6977 subjects. Gene. 2012;511:12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yuan L., Liu J., Dong L., Cai C., Wang S., Wang B., Xiao R. Effects of APOE rs429358, rs7412 and GSTM1/GSTT1 polymorphism on plasma and erythrocyte antioxidant parameters and cognition in old Chinese adults. Nutrients. 2015;7:8261–8273. doi: 10.3390/nu7105391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zheng L., Duan J., Duan X., Zhou W., Chen C., Chen J., Song W. Association of Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphism with Alzheimer's disease in Chinese population. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2016 doi: 10.2174/1567205013666160401115307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhu S., Wang Z., Wu X., Shu Y., Lu D. Apolipoprotein E polymorphism is associated with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: color-flow Doppler ultrasound evaluation. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13:21. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-13-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Fig. 1

Funnel plot of APOE polymorphism and aSAH risk in the genetic model (A) ε2/ε2 versus ε3/ε3 (B) ε2 versus ε3 (C) ε2 allele frequency (D) ε4 allele frequency.

mmc1.doc (50.5KB, doc)
Supplementary Fig. 2

Sensitivity analysis of APOE polymorphism and aSAH risk in the genetic models (A) ε4 versus ε3 (B) ε2allele frequency (C) ε4 allele frequency.

mmc2.doc (404.5KB, doc)

Articles from Meta Gene are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES