Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2016 Jul 11;291(34):17829–17847. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.736538

Epigenetic Plasticity Drives Adipogenic and Osteogenic Differentiation of Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells*

Mark B Meyer , Nancy A Benkusky , Buer Sen §, Janet Rubin §, J Wesley Pike ‡,1
PMCID: PMC5016174  PMID: 27402842

Abstract

Terminal differentiation of multipotent stem cells is achieved through a coordinated cascade of activated transcription factors and epigenetic modifications that drive gene transcription responsible for unique cell fate. Within the mesenchymal lineage, factors such as RUNX2 and PPARγ are indispensable for osteogenesis and adipogenesis, respectively. We therefore investigated genomic binding of transcription factors and accompanying epigenetic modifications that occur during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). As assessed by ChIP-sequencing and RNA-sequencing analyses, we found that genes vital for osteogenic identity were linked to RUNX2, C/EBPβ, retinoid X receptor, and vitamin D receptor binding sites, whereas adipocyte differentiation favored PPARγ, retinoid X receptor, C/EBPα, and C/EBPβ binding sites. Epigenetic marks were clear predictors of active differentiation loci as well as enhancer activities and selective gene expression. These marrow-derived MSCs displayed an epigenetic pattern that suggested a default preference for the osteogenic pathway; however, these patterns were rapidly altered near the Adipoq, Cidec, Fabp4, Lipe, Plin1, Pparg, and Cebpa genes during adipogenic differentiation. Surprisingly, we found that these cells also exhibited an epigenetic plasticity that enabled them to trans-differentiate from adipocytes to osteoblasts (and vice versa) after commitment, as assessed by staining, gene expression, and ChIP-quantitative PCR analysis. The osteogenic default pathway may be subverted during pathological conditions, leading to skeletal fragility and increased marrow adiposity during aging, estrogen deficiency, and skeletal unloading. Taken together, our data provide an increased mechanistic understanding of the epigenetic programs necessary for multipotent differentiation of MSCs that may prove beneficial in the development of therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: adipocyte, cell differentiation, ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq), histone modification, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), osteoblast

Introduction

The mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)2 is a multipotential unit with the ability to differentiate along osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic, myogenic, and neurogenic pathways (1). A common source of MSCs is derived from bone marrow. In addition to bone marrow, however, MSCs can also be isolated from adipogenic tissue sources (aMSC or ASC), umbilical cord tissue, pancreas, and most other vascularized tissues (1). Regardless of the source, these cells retain their ability to differentiate into a number of common lineages when appropriately stimulated, displaying cell markers such as CD29, CD44, CD70, CD73, CD90, CD105, and Stro-1, while lacking markers for early hematopoietic lineages (CD34 and others) (2, 3). Although the markers for identification of a “true” MSC remain somewhat controversial, multipotential differentiation morphology remains the hallmark of the MSC. These phenotypes are driven by distinct and essential sets of cell signaling pathways and their respective target transcription factors. Adipogenic differentiation relies on the expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), and agonists of the PPARγ pathway promote the formation of adipocytes at the expense of osteoblasts (4, 5). Osteogenic differentiation, on the other hand, cannot proceed without expression of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) (6, 7) and its downstream effects on osterix (OSX, Sp7) expression. Wnt and Hedgehog signaling pathways favor the osteogenic versus the adipogenic lineage (8, 9). Likewise, bone morphogenic proteins and TGFβ direct MSCs toward both osteogenic and chondrogenic phenotypes (10). Interleukins and STAT signaling uniquely promote specific chondrogenic differentiation (11). In addition to chemical signals, MSCs are able to respond to cues from physical interactions with intranuclear actin to up-regulate RUNX2 as well as to repress adipogenesis through down-regulation of C/EBPβ and PPARγ in response to mechanical loading that favors bone (1214). In all, the MSC is a versatile cell capable of responding to various signals for varied terminal differentiation programs.

One of the major transcription factors active in preosteogenesis is the vitamin D receptor (VDR), a ligand-activated secondary activator of MSCs. VDR is able to regulate the expression of genes that are vital to osteoblastic identity in early osteoblastic cells as well as in MSCs through coordination with the actions of RUNX2 and C/EBPβ (15, 16). The VDR has a pervasive genomic footprint in preosteoblastic cells that is reduced as these cells undergo further osteoblastic differentiation, but VDR is still an active regulator of transcription in both differentiation states (15). Likewise, recent efforts have been made to establish a role for the VDR in the adipocyte, where, as in the osteoblast, VDR has a somewhat conflicted role throughout differentiation. Global VDR knock-out in mice results in adipocyte atrophy, and mice with the VDR ablated specifically in adipose tissue show increased mammary epithelial density (17, 18). The active metabolite of vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D3, has been shown to prevent adipocyte differentiation in vitro and simultaneously up-regulate cytokine and leptin activity in fat tissue (19, 20). Despite the specifics of these activities, VDR is present in cells of all mesenchymally derived lineages and remains an important transcription factor in vivo for both osteoblasts and adipocytes.

The regulatory activities of these transcription factors are accompanied (or preceded) by epigenetic modifications to either DNA or to histone protein tails to allow additional transcription factor access to genes vital for lineage determination. The epigenetic marks in osteoblastic cells (15, 16, 21) and in adipocyte cell culture models (22) have revealed distinct patterns for gene expression in terminally differentiated cell types. Previous research has determined that the histone-modifying enzymes responsible for many of these patterns, including KDM5B, EZH2, and others, play a clear role in skeletal development and differentiation of the MSC through modulation of RUNX2 (23, 24). A recent study found distinct open regions of DNase I-hypersensitive DNA in a human temperature-dependent model of osteoblast differentiation that favored genes known for the osteoblastic phenotype (25). Chromatin marks are dynamic in nature and can shift location based upon the stimulus received (26). In fact, the plasticity of histone and chromatin modifications is believed to allow for memory context in the brain (27), circadian rhythm (28, 29), and even the potential for trans-differentiation from one cell type to another, as exemplified by smooth muscle cell transitions into macrophages in atherosclerosis (30). Trans-differentiation of mesenchymal cells can be used to create neural stem cells (31), insulin-producing cells (32), auditory cells (33), or other therapeutically relevant cell lines. Their accessibility and availability have made MSCs (stromal or adipose-derived) an attractive cell type for studies in personalized regenerative medicine.

Given the diverse differentiation potential of marrow-derived MSCs as well as their dynamic nature, we sought to investigate the transcription factor cascades as well as histone modification patterns that characterize these differentiating cells. We differentiated MSCs in culture for 7 or 15 days using osteogenic medium and 7 days using adipogenic medium. At these time points, we performed RNA-seq analysis to establish changes in the transcriptome and ChIP-seq analysis to investigate the cistromes for a number of transcription factors (RUNX2, C/EBPβ, C/EBPα, PPARγ, VDR, and RXR) as well as several epigenetic marks (H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K36me3) that are associated with these transitions. We found that chromatin state profiles for the undifferentiated MSC closely resembled those of osteogenic cells differentiated for 7 or 15 days, indicating a potentially predetermined epigenetic pathway for these cells. These chromatin state profiles were dramatically altered, however, following adipogenic differentiation for 7 days, especially near genes vital for adipogenic function. These profiles accurately predicted the transition and gene output activity at the locus in which they resided. Finally, we found that despite numerous genomic, chromatin, and gene expression changes, MSCs were able to trans-differentiate from an adipogenic to an osteogenic lineage and vice versa. These two cell types displayed the appropriate cell morphology, transcriptomic, and genomic changes of the emerging trans-differentiated phenotype and demonstrated a plasticity in the histone modifications that allowed these transitions to occur in vitro. These observations provide a potential mechanism during pathological conditions that lead to skeletal fragility and increased marrow adiposity as in aging, estrogen deficiency, and in skeletal unloading. These expression patterns and profiles will be beneficial in understanding the mechanisms that underlie the cellular and genomic transitions that occur during differentiation and may lead to insights that will be required for the successful development of therapies or drug discovery models in the future.

Results

Marrow-derived MSCs Differentiate into Mature Adipocytes and Osteoblasts

Marrow-derived MSCs present an interesting model of differentiation because they are capable of transitioning into a wide variety of cell types, most notably osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes. In the marrow space, stromal cells differentiate into these cell types to maintain bone integrity and health. We chose to investigate the genetic (transcription factors) and epigenetic (histone modifications) pathways involved in the differentiation of the MSCs to osteoblasts and adipocytes. As outlined in Fig. 1 and detailed under “Experimental Procedures,” marrow-derived cells were isolated from C57bl/6 mice, and selected MSCs were cultured and validated as described previously (34, 35). MSCs were then expanded for differentiation, staining, ChIP-seq, and RNA-seq analyses. They were then induced for 7 days in adipogenic medium (MSC-F7) or for 7 (MSC-B7) and 15 (MSC-B15) days with osteogenic medium. At these time points, the cells were collected for staining, ChIP-seq, and RNA-seq analysis. Oil Red O (ORO) staining was performed to examine lipid accumulation in adipocytes, and alizarin red (AR) staining was used to detect calcium deposition in mineralizing osteoblasts. The differentiation states displayed the appropriate cell morphology and staining as in Fig. 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Experimental overview. Primary bone marrow cells were isolated and cultured to preserve the MSCs. Following the isolation, the cells were expanded and differentiated for 7 days with adipogenic medium (MSC-F7) or for 7 (MSC-B7) and 15 (MSC-B15) days with osteogenic medium. At each end point (and day 0; MSC), the cells were collected for RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, and stained with Oil Red O and alizarin red. All images were at 4× magnification.

Having established the anticipated morphology, we then confirmed appropriate transcriptomic changes as well. As can be seen in Fig. 2, differentiated MSCs were easily distinguished as either osteoblasts (MSC-B7) or adipocytes (MSC-F7) from their gene expression profiles. These patterns identified in MSC, MSC-B7, MSC-B15, and MSC-F7 cells are displayed as heat maps from a hierarchical clustering analysis (using Euclidean distance) of the top 200 up-regulated (top) and down-regulated (bottom) genes contrasting MSC-B7 versus MSC (Fig. 2A) and MSC-F7 versus MSC (Fig. 2B). A large contingent of the genes up-regulated in MSC-B7 cells was also up-regulated in MSC-B15 cells, as can be observed by the gene clusters. This relationship is better visualized through the Venn diagrams documented in Fig. 2C. Here, genes that were up-regulated >2-fold within a 95% confidence interval (moderated t test) versus MSCs are shown on the left. A total of 373 genes were up-regulated in MSC-B7 cells (versus MSCs), 658 genes were up-regulated in MSC-B15 (versus MSC), and 1,312 genes were up-regulated in MSC-F7 cells (versus MSCs). Similarly, an analysis of the down-regulated genes revealed that there were many more genes suppressed in each condition: MSC-B7 with 9,152, MSC-B15 with 8,005, and MSC-F7 with 12,711 genes. As expected, both the up- and down-regulated genes of MSC-B7 and MSC-B15 cells displayed more closely related gene expression patterns than those with MSC-F7 cells; however, many genes were unique to both the MSC-B7 and MSC-B15 differentiation states.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Marrow-derived MSCs differentiate into mature adipocytes and osteoblasts. MSCs were differentiated with osteogenic medium for 7 days (MSC-B7) and 15 days (MSC-B15) or with adipogenic medium for 7 days (MSC-F7) and compared with MSC day 0 cells (MSC). The resulting RNA was reverse-transcribed and analyzed by sequencing. The top 200 genes that were up- and down-regulated were clustered using hierarchical clustering followed by Euclidean distance metric and displayed in a heat map for those osteogenic genes (MSC-B7) (A) and adipogenic genes (MSC-F7) (B) on a log2 scale as indicated. C, gene expression was compared for each differentiation state versus MSC (day 0) and displayed as -fold change that was greater than both 2-fold and 95% moderated t test confidence interval (CI). Overlapping genes are represented in the Venn diagram (up-regulated genes, left, red; down-regulated genes, right, blue) with total regulated genes listed under the differentiation state. D, gene association was investigated through GeneMANIA interactions, where input genes (black circles) were predicted to interact with each other as well as proposed networked genes (gray circles) through algorithm prediction (yellow lines), co-expression (pink lines), co-localization (blue lines), or shared protein domains (green) from the literature. Higher correlation results in a denser network with the gene connection lines being shorter. E, gene association was also interrogated for osteogenic genes through DAVID functional analysis tools, which led to the enriched GO categories as listed with correlated p values (right). The top GO terms are listed for the up-regulated (left) and down-regulated genes (right). F, genes up-regulated by adipogenic differentiation were interrogated by GeneMANIA as in D and G and DAVID GO term correlation as in E.

We then examined these gene networks through the GeneMANIA (Gene Multiple Association Network Integration Algorithm) pathway and literature analysis tool (36). As shown in Fig. 2D, the top osteogenic genes shared in common with both the MSC-B7 and MSC-B15 cells are displayed. The genes within the black circles are those explored in GeneMANIA. These were computed to exhibit connections between each other as well as with genes predicted to be within a gene regulatory network (gray circles). We found that these highly regulated genes were tightly correlated with not only the algorithm prediction (orange lines) but also genes known to be co-expressed (purple) and/or co-localized (blue). Furthermore, this gene network can be interrogated by gene ontology (GO) analysis through the DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery) functional analysis tool (37, 38). The gene network associated with osteogenic differentiation was highly enriched for GO terms related to skeletal formation, ossification, and extracellular structure organization (Fig. 2E). In fact, osteocytic genes shared with MSC-B7 and MSC-B15 cells were further increased in the MSC-B15 cells, suggesting that by day 15, the MSCs were either progressing toward or had become osteocytes, as recently suggested (39). Interestingly, gremlin-1 (Grem1) expression was identified following osteoblast differentiation; Grem1-positive MSCs are hypothesized to be unable to differentiate into adipocytes (40). Similarly, genes up-regulated in MSC-F7 cells versus MSCs were also interrogated using the GeneMANIA pathway analysis (Fig. 2F) as well as DAVID functional analysis tools (Fig. 2G). The interactions within the adipogenic network of genes were tighter than those within MSC-B7 and MSC-B15 cells. These genes were highly enriched in GO categories involved in adipogenesis. Thus, the MSC-F7 transition was the more extreme differentiation process, although we suspect that associated transcriptomic changes in MSCs of fat origin could well be different. Taken together, the transcriptome analyses indicate that MSCs express the necessary gene profiles for osteoblasts, osteocytes, and adipocytes and that larger transcriptomic changes are observed during marrow-derived MSC differentiation into adipocytes than into bone cells.

MSC Differentiation Is Driven by Specific and Unique Transcription Factor Complexes

Transcriptomic changes (gene expression) are a direct consequence of genomic regulation. Transcription factors that respond to cellular stimuli are able to bind to the genome and activate the transcription of lineage- or stimuli-dependent genes. Here, we sought to investigate lineage-dependent transcription factors and to define a role for a secondary effector in hormone-dependent VDR activities. Therefore, MSCs were differentiated into MSC-B7, MSC-B15, or MSC-F7 cells and then treated with either vehicle (ethanol) or 100 nm 1,25(OH)2D3 for 3 h, as indicated. ChIP-seq analysis was performed at each of these differentiation time points for VDR, RXR, RUNX2, C/EBPβ, C/EBPα, and PPARγ in MSC, MSC-B7, and MSC-F7 cells. Table 1 provides direct genomic binding quantitation for these factors as overlapping or unique ChIP-seq transcription factor DNA binding peaks after ChIP-seq interrogation (bioinformatically determined genomic locations where protein-DNA binding was enriched ∼200–300 bp in length) between each differentiation state. Tabular Venn diagrams depict the total number of peaks found in each data set for each antibody. For example, there were 1,752 total peaks for VDR in the unstimulated (vehicle) condition in MSCs. This number was dramatically reduced to only 245 peaks in MSC-B7 cells. 241 sites were found to overlap in each condition, leaving 1,511 peaks exclusively in MSCs and only four peaks unique to MSC-B7 cells. This pattern was similar for the remaining transcription factors. C/EBPα and PPARγ were not investigated in MSC-B15 cells.

TABLE 1.

Venn diagram data with differentiation state (left) with total peaks indicated in parentheses versus the indicated differentiation state (right) for each specific antibody or treatment (VDR and RXR have vehicle and 1,25(OH)2D3 conditions; the remainder are vehicle-treated cells)

Those peaks found only in the left condition are shown under “Only” on the left; those that are found in both the left and right are shown under “Overlapping”; and those found only in the right condition shown under “Only” on the right. 1,25, 1,25(OH)2D3.

Antibody Cell (total peaks) Only Overlapping Only Cell (total peaks)
VDR vehicle MSC (1,752) 1,511 241 4 MSC-B7 (245)
MSC (1,752) 1,436 316 23 MSC-B15 (339)
MSC (1,752) 1,411 341 33 MSC-F7 (374)
MSC-B7 (245) 2 243 96 MSC-B15 (339)
MSC-B7 (245) 12 233 141 MSC-F7 (374)
MSC-B15 (339) 60 279 95 MSC-F7 (374)
VDR 1,25 MSC (10,557) 9,812 745 78 MSC-B7 (823)
MSC (10,557) 9,325 1,232 133 MSC-B15 (1,365)
MSC (10,557) 9,988 569 47 MSC-F7 (616)
MSC-B7 (823) 127 696 669 MSC-B15 (1,365)
MSC-B7 (823) 386 437 179 MSC-F7 (616)
MSC-B15 (1,365) 901 464 152 MSC-F7 (616)
RXR vehicle MSC (26,106) 15,601 10,504 1,954 MSC-B7 (12,458)
MSC (26,106) 17,417 8,689 1,684 MSC-B15 (10,373)
MSC (26,106) 19,112 6,994 10,207 MSC-F7 (17,201)
MSC-B7 (12,458) 5,041 7,417 2,956 MSC-B15 (10,373)
MSC-B7 (12,458) 8,484 3,974 13,227 MSC-F7 (17,201)
MSC-B15 (10,373) 6,951 3,422 13,779 MSC-F7 (17,201)
RXR 1,25 MSC (30,622) 16,825 13,797 2,516 MSC-B7 (16,313)
MSC (30,622) 21,539 9,083 1,318 MSC-B15 (10,401)
MSC (30,622) 25,339 5,283 7,575 MSC-F7 (12,858)
MSC-B7 (16,313) 8,076 8,237 2,164 MSC-B15 (10,401)
MSC-B7 (16,313) 12,752 3,561 9,297 MSC-F7 (12,858)
MSC-B15 (10,401) 7,777 2,624 10,234 MSC-F7 (12,858)
RUNX2 MSC (33,266) 15,524 18,042 7,421 MSC-B7 (25,463)
MSC (33,266) 17,734 15,532 3,632 MSC-B15 (19,164)
MSC (33,266) 21,227 12,039 4,248 MSC-F7 (16,287)
MSC-B7 (25,463) 11,208 14,255 4,909 MSC-B15 (19,164)
MSC-B7 (25,463) 13,461 12,002 4,285 MSC-F7 (16,287)
MSC-B15 (19,164) 10,949 8,072 8,215 MSC-F7 (16,287)
C/EBPβ MSC (46,232) 28,449 17,783 1,396 MSC-B7 (19,179)
MSC (46,232) 20,546 25,666 16,326 MSC-B15 (41,992)
MSC (46,232) 30,732 15,500 7,486 MSC-F7 (22,986)
MSC-B7 (19,179) 1,241 17,938 24,054 MSC-B15 (41,992)
MSC-B7 (19,179) 8,997 10,182 12,804 MSC-F7 (22,986)
MSC-B15 (41,992) 30,549 11,443 11,543 MSC-F7 (22,986)
C/EBPα MSC (42,986) 15,676 27,309 6,891 MSC-B7 (34,200)
MSC (42,986) 20,804 22,181 18,292 MSC-F7 (40,474)
MSC-B7 (34,200) 15,268 18,932 21,541 MSC-F7 (40,474)
PPARγ MSC (25,701) 15,661 10,040 2,700 MSC-B7 (12,740)
MSC (25,701) 16,470 9,231 14,045 MSC-F7 (23,278)
MSC-B7 (12,740) 7,166 5,574 17,704 MSC-F7 (23,278)

Recently, we found that VDR/RXR, RUNX2, and C/EBPβ were highly correlated to sites near genes that were important for the differentiation of preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells into more mature mineralizing osteoblasts and described this as an osteoblast enhancer complex (15, 16). In MSCs, we found a similar relationship. As can be seen in Fig. 3A, peak locations for VDR/RXR (9,599 1,25(OH)2D3-stimulated peaks) overlapped those with RUNX2 (33,266 peaks) and C/EBPβ (46,232 peaks). Indeed, we found that these three transcription factors have 4,567 common binding locations throughout the MSC genome. After differentiation, whereas the cistromes for each of these factors were quantitatively lowered, especially in the case of the VDR, there were 177 genomic locations in which VDR/RXR, RUNX2, and C/EBPβ were found to overlap. In fact, the 15,000 RUNX2 and C/EBPβ binding sites that overlapped in MSCs were reduced to ∼6,000 upon differentiation (MSC-B7). Similarly, there was a high degree of overlap in the factors responsible for adipogenic differentiation. In Fig. 3B, whereas C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, and PPARγ were found to overlap at 11,542 locations in the undifferentiated MSC, this number was significantly reduced to 6,494 regions in MSC-F7 cells, led by strong decreases in C/EBPβ binding activity post-differentiation (from 46,232 to 22,986). As Fig. 3B and Table 1 illustrate, although the total number of C/EBPα peaks remained constant near 40,000 in both the MSCs and MSC-F7 cells, the locations of these sites changed dramatically, resulting in only 22,181 overlapping peaks with nearly 20,000 peaks unique to both MSCs and MSC-F7 cells. The same observation was made for PPARγ. However, in both cases, the primary drivers of adipogenesis, C/EBPα, and PPARγ remain highly correlated (41). Finally, because genomic programs remain present in MSCs to drive subsequent multilineage differentiation, the overlap between VDR/RXR, RUNX2, C/EBPβ, and PPARγ was examined. These factors assembled collectively at 4,173 sites across the genome, although many additional unique and subcombinatorial sites also exist. The overlapping peak regions for these and perhaps other factors suggest that these sites represent transcription factor “hot spots” for the regulation of this mesenchymal-derived lineage as recently proposed (41, 42).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

MSC differentiation is driven by specific and unique transcription factor complexes. ChIP-seq was performed with antibodies for VDR, RXR, RUNX2, and C/EBPβ in MSCs (day 0) as well as MSCs differentiated with osteogenic medium (MSC-B7) (A) or C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, and PPARγ differentiated with adipogenic medium (MSC-F7) (B). Overlapping ChIP-seq peaks are displayed in Venn diagrams. Total ChIP-seq peak numbers are indicated below each antibody. C, intersections of VDR, RXR, RUNX2, C/EBPβ, and PPARγ are shown by a Venn diagram with total ChIP-seq peak numbers indicated below each antibody. D, overlaid ChIP-seq tracks are displayed for VDR, RXR, C/EBPβ, RUNX2, C/EBPα, and PPARγ in the MSC (pink), MSC-B7 (blue), MSC-B15 (yellow), and MSC-F7 (green) cells at the Mmp13 and Adipoq genomic regions. Genomic location and scale are indicated (top), and maximum height of tag sequence density for each data track is indicated on the y axis (top left of each track, normalized to input and 107 tags). Gene transcriptional direction is indicated by an arrow, and exons are shown as boxes (top). E, ChIP-seq peaks are correlated to those genes that were up- or down-regulated. ChIP-seq peak locations for VDR/RXR, RUNX2, and C/EBPβ (top, 4,567 regions) or C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, and PPARγ (bottom, 11,542 regions) were converted into nearby genes using the GREAT genomic association rules (4,452 genes and 7,869 genes, respectively). These genes were then compared with the genes that were found to be up-regulated (red) or down-regulated (blue) by RNA-seq. The resulting gene lists were then compared using DAVID functional analysis tools, which led to the enriched GO categories as listed with correlated p values (right).

A prime example of overlapping ChIP-seq peaks is evident at the Mmp13 and Adipoq genomic regions. In Fig. 3D, ChIP-seq data are presented where individual data tracks are overlaid (track hubs) for MSCs (pink), MSC-B7 (blue), MSC-B15 (yellow), and MSC-F7 (green) cells normalized by sequence tag number and to input sample. ChIP-seq data tracks are presented for VDR (treated for 3 h with 100 nm 1,25(OH)2D3), RXR, C/EBPβ, RUNX2, C/EBPα, and PPARγ antibodies. Our recently published work on the Mmp13 gene locus defined a distinct set of enhancers located upstream of the transcriptional start site (TSS) at −10, −20, and −30 kb for VDR, RUNX2, and C/EBPβ (43). These sites and factor occupancy are identical in the MSCs, although several of these enhancers also contain additional C/EBPα and PPARγ binding activities as well. For the Mmp13 gene, however, significant increases in factor binding were not apparent for any particular cell differentiation state because the Mmp13 gene is expressed and up-regulated in each of these cell types (supplemental Table 1). This was in stark contrast to the regulation of the Adipoq gene and transcription factor binding activity within its locus. The Adipoq gene is highly up-regulated in MSC-F7 cells (115-fold) and controlled in part through the binding of C/EBPα, PPARγ, and its promiscuous RXR heterodimer binding partner. These findings are apparent in the ChIP-seq data set documented in Fig. 3D (right). There were, however, increases in PPARγ and RXR binding near and immediately upstream of the Adipoq TSS specifically in MSC-F7 cells, as indicated by increases in peak amplitude (enrichment of green color). Despite these increases in MSC-F7 cells versus MSCs (115-fold), there appear to be low expression levels of Adipoq in MSCs and MSC-B7 cells. These residually bound transcription factors may facilitate basal expression.

Finally, when ChIP-seq analyses and RNA-seq gene expression data were combined, genes were enriched for osteoblast- or adipocyte-specific pathways. In Fig. 3E, ChIP-seq peaks are linked to nearby genes through the Genomic Regions Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT) (44). We used the GREAT algorithm and the “basal plus extension” standard rule wherein each gene is assigned to a basal regulatory domain of 5 kb upstream and 1 kb downstream of the TSS and the gene regulatory domain is then extended in both directions to the nearest gene's basal domain by no more than 1 Mb in a single direction. 4,567 genomic locations contained overlapping peaks of VDR/RXR, RUNX2, and C/EBPβ and were localized to 4,452 genes. Thus, many genes contain multiple binding sites within their genomic loci as determined by GREAT. The intersection of these peak-associated genes with those that were actually regulated yields only 172 up-regulated (or 46% of the total) and 1,018 (or 11%) down-regulated genes through differentiation (independent of any vitamin D activity). These gene groups were then evaluated by the DAVID functional analysis tool and displayed as enriched GO group terms (38, 45). Genes up-regulated in MSC-B7 cells were highly correlated to skeletal formation, with groups such as skeletal system development, ossification, and cartilage development being enriched and containing specific p value scores ≪0.05. Conversely, peaks associated with the down-regulated genes were involved in broad generic categories with lower enrichment scores. 11,542 peaks located at the intersection of C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, and PPARγ were found to be associated with 7,869 genes. These peak-associated genes were coordinated with 46% of the up-regulated genes and only 25% of the down-regulated genes. Up-regulated genes were associated with adipogenic processes, such as energy creation, and down-regulated genes were found to be involved in cell adhesion and migration. Up-regulated genes were better correlated with the gene regions that contained peaks of transcription factor binding. Although this does not define a role for transcription factor peaks near genes that are not regulated, many of these genes are still expressed within the different lineages (linear RNA-seq RPKM value >1). Therefore, basal (not statistically inducible) expression may still require transcription factor proximity.

Contribution to Gene Regulation by the Vitamin D Hormone

VDR is widely expressed in many tissues and can be up-regulated at both the transcriptional and post-translational levels upon ligand binding, the latter probably through a stabilization mechanism imposed by 1,25(OH)2D3 (46). The VDR is a ligand-inducible steroid hormone receptor and may have a mechanism of DNA binding and gene activation different from that of factors such as RUNX2 or C/EBPβ (15, 16), which are generally prebound to DNA and activated through post-translational modification. VDR appears to be restrictive for differentiation (15) yet exhibits pervasive binding activity throughout the genome. Recently, we found that the levels of VDR decreased in differentiated osteoblasts, although lowered concentrations of VDR were still sufficient to activate gene transcription (15). We therefore assessed these behaviors of the VDR during the course of MSC differentiation, as can be seen in Fig. 4. A similar number of genes were statistically up-regulated in MSCs (173 genes) and in MSC-B7 (311 genes), MSC-B15 (218 genes), and MSC-F7 (293 genes) cells after a 24-h treatment with 100 nm 1,25(OH)2D3. However, the number of genes down-regulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 after differentiation decreased dramatically, from 337 to 95, 56, and 99, respectively. The overlaps of these regulated genes appear in Venn diagram form in Fig. 4A. Surprisingly, although only 11 genes were up-regulated (>2-fold, >95% confidence interval) in all three differentiation states (Cyp24a1, Prrg4, Sema3e, Fgl2, Inmt, Gpdp5, Neu3, Enpp3, Mdfi, Klhl33, and Grk5), only a single gene was statistically down-regulated (Ibsp). The complete gene lists can be found in supplemental Table 1.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Contribution to gene regulation by the vitamin D hormone. MSCs at day 0 (MSC), differentiated for 7 days (MSC-B7) or 15 days (MSC-B15) with osteogenic medium or 7 days (MSC-F7) with adipogenic medium were treated with a single dose of vehicle or 100 nm 1,25(OH)2D3 for 24 h. A, gene expression was investigated as -fold change 1,25(OH)2D3 (1,25D3) versus vehicle (Veh) greater than both 2-fold and 95% moderated t test confidence interval (CI). Overlapping genes are represented in the Venn diagram (up-regulated genes, left, red; down-regulated genes, right, blue) with total regulated genes listed under the differentiation state. B, ChIP-seq was performed after 3 h of treatment with 100 nm 1,25(OH)2D3 or vehicle, and peaks were tabulated as indicated. The table displays Venn diagram data, where differentiation state in vehicle condition (left) with total peaks indicated in parentheses is shown versus the 1,25(OH)2D3 condition (right). Those peaks found only in the vehicle condition are shown in only on the left; those that are found in both the vehicle and 1,25(OH)2D3 are shown in overlapping; and those found only in the 1,25(OH)2D3 condition are shown in only on the right. C, ChIP-seq peaks for RXR were performed as in B, and then each 1,25(OH)2D3 condition was overlapped with the VDR in the 1,25(OH)2D3 condition. The numbers listed represent numbers of peaks where RXR and VDR are found in the same peak genomic location for each differentiation state. D, an analysis of de novo overrepresentation of sequences present in each peak was performed by HOMER. The top three ranking motif logos are listed along with their best matched transcription factor (left), associated p value (middle), and abundance shown as a percentage (black) compared with 50,000 GC content-matched sequences (red) above each logo for MSC (top), MSC-B7 (middle), and MSC-F7 (bottom). E, ChIP-seq peaks are correlated to those genes that were up- or down-regulated by 1,25(OH)2D3. ChIP-seq peak locations for VDR/RXR (9,599 peaks) were converted into nearby genes using the GREAT genomic association rules (7,167 genes). These genes were then compared with the genes that were found to be up-regulated (red) or down-regulated (blue) by 1,25(OH)2D3 through RNA-seq. The resulting gene lists were then compared using DAVID functional analysis tools, which led to the enriched GO categories as listed with correlated p values (right). Overlaid ChIP-seq tracks are displayed for VDR in MSC, MSC-B7, MSC-B15, and MSC-F7, as well as RXR in MSC, treated with vehicle (Veh, yellow) or 1,25(OH)2D3 (1,25D3, blue), where the overlapping regions appear as green at the Mdfi (F), Prrg4 (G), and Gdpd5 (H) genomic regions. Genomic location and scale are indicated (top), and maximum height of tag sequence density for each data track is indicated on the y axis (top left of each track, normalized to input and 107 tags). Gene transcriptional direction is indicated by an arrow, and exons are shown as boxes (top).

Similar to the observations made in MC3T3-E1 cells (15), the genomic binding activity of the VDR is decreased dramatically after differentiation. Protein levels of VDR, however, were suppressed to a lesser degree in MSC-B7 and MSC-B15 cells (data not shown) than in MC3T3-E1 cells. In Fig. 4B, the ChIP-seq peak data for VDR binding in both vehicle (Veh)- and 1,25(OH)2D3 (1,25D3)-treated cells is summarized. VDR binding increased in MSCs from 1,752 peaks to 10,557 peaks, which is consistent with the ligand-activated nature of VDR DNA recruitment. Although the numbers of VDR binding sites were not identical, much of the MSC data overlapped that seen in MC3T3-E1 cells (vehicle, 947; 1,25(OH)2D3, 7,007) at >90% of all genomic locations (data not shown). Despite the decrease in genomic binding of VDR in each of the differentiation states, however, this binding remained generally ligand-dependent, although a modest but significant VDR binding activity at selected sites on the genome in the absence of 1,25(OH)2D3 is present in multiple cell types and was evident in MSCs as well (15, 47, 48). 1,408 of the 1,752 VDR peaks seen in the MSCs in the absence of 1,25(OH)2D3 were shared with the 10,557 peaks detected after 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulation, leaving only 344 peak regions occupied by VDR across the genome in the absence of ligand. Finally, the VDR DNA binding partner RXR was found at greater than 90% of the VDR peak locations, and the remaining 10% exhibited a level of RXR enrichment that was evident but did not reach statistical significance (data not shown, available in raw ChIP-seq reads). Importantly, the most common de novo motif found by HOMER sequence overrepresentation in each differentiation state belonged to a canonical DR3 type VDRE (Fig. 4D). However, a further position weight matrix-based search of these ChIP-seq peaks suggested that 92% of the VDR peaks contained a DR3 type VDRE, as found by Genomatix (VDR_RXR.01 and VDR_RXR.04, core similarity 0.75, matrix similarity optimum −0.10) (49). Therefore, there is limited evidence for an abundance of alternative DNA binding modes (homodimer, tethering, non-canonical VDRE) for the VDR aside from the canonical VDR/RXR heterodimer. Although the VDR is present and ligand-activated in all cell types, the genomic impact of the VDR appeared to be greatest in undifferentiated MSCs.

GREAT association of VDR genomic ChIP-seq peaks with neighboring genes resulted in 9,599 peaks being associated with 7,167 genes. This highlights the likelihood that many genes have multiple peaks of VDR/RXR binding, as was demonstrated for PPARγ, RUNX2, C/EBPβ, and C/EBPα binding in Fig. 3E. There is a higher correlation with ChIP-seq peaks (76%) and genes that are up-regulated by 1,25(OH)2D3. The most enriched GO term categories for the up- and down-regulated genes are shown in the right panel of Fig. 4E. According to these enriched categories, 1,25(OH)2D3-mediated gene expression does not favor osteoblast-specific categories. Finally, ChIP-seq data tracks are presented for three genes that were up-regulated by gene expression in each of the differentiation states: MyoD family inhibitor (Mdfi) (Fig. 4F), proline-rich Gla protein 4 (Prrg4) (Fig. 4G), and glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase domain-containing 5 (Gdpd5) (Fig. 4H). The overlaid ChIP-seq data tracks for VDR in the vehicle (Veh, yellow) and 1,25(OH)2D3 (1,25D3, blue) conditions (where overlapping tracks appear green) are displayed for each of the differentiation states of the MSCs as well as for RXR in MSCs only for comparison. There was a strong enrichment of VDR following treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3, as indicated in the ChIP-seq data hub tracks. Whereas Mdfi and Prrg4 loci display single peaks of VDR/RXR binding activity at −8 and −15 kb, respectively, it appears as though the Gdpd5 locus contains several peaks of VDR/RXR binding activity that may comprise enhancers for the control of expression of this gene. This latter model was found to be important in the regulation of many vitamin D-responsive genes, such as Mmp13, Vdr, c-Fos, Tnfsf11, Trpv6, and others (15, 43, 47, 5053).

Epigenetic Transitions Predict Crucial Regulatory Loci during Differentiation

Transcription factors bind to the genome in a punctate pattern and are vital mediators of external cellular stimuli. These events can be preceded by, or are an effect of, the chromatin landscape in which they reside; therefore, histone modifications can be accurate predictors of the genomic transitions (26). We investigated five different chromatin modification marks that specify important genomic locations, such as transcriptional start sites (H3K4me3) or enhancer signatures (H3K4me1), or genomic events such as transcriptional elongation (H3K36me3) or gene activation (H4K5ac and H3K9ac) (26). In Fig. 5A, ChIP-seq peaks are tabulated for these chromatin modification marks in the absence or presence of 1,25(OH)2D3 for each differentiation state. From a cis-regulatory element annotation system (CEAS) analysis in Fig. 5B, we found that these histone marks followed the expected genomic distribution profiles when all gene bodies throughout the genome are averaged together to display the ChIP-seq tag densities as reported previously (54). During differentiation, peaks shifted in amplitude (greater or lesser peak reads) but not necessarily in location, similar to recent observations (55). This was demonstrated in Fig. 5C, where the peak overlap of the H3K9ac mark in MSCs versus MSC-B7 cells, as one example, represents 99 and 92% of all peak locations, respectively. This was in contrast to the H3K9ac mark, where 76 and 87% of peaks were found to overlap following differentiation of MSCs into MSC-F7 cells, leaving 7,543 sites unique to MSCs and 2,760 sites unique to MSC-F7 cells. These relationships were observed in the remaining histone modification marks as well (ChIP-seq raw reads). Therefore, MSC-B7 cells exhibited an epigenetic profile that is similar to that of undifferentiated MSCs, whereas the profile for MSC-F7 cells is dramatically different.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Epigenetic transitions predict crucial regulatory loci during differentiation. A, ChIP-seq peak numbers of histone modification markers H4K5ac, H3K9ac, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K36me3 after 3-h vehicle or 100 nm 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulation are tabulated for each differentiation condition (MSC, MSC-B7, MSC-B15, and MSC-F7). B, CEAS analysis averaged all genes across the genome, and the ChIP-seq tag density as average profile for −1 kb to the TSS, averaged gene body, and transcriptional termination site (TTS) to +1 kb are displayed. Histone markers are displayed as H4K5ac (purple), H3K4me1 (blue), H3K4me3 (red), H3K9ac (green), and H3K36me3 (orange). C, overlapping ChIP-seq peaks between MSC and MSC-B7 or MSC and MSC-F7 for H3K9ac are shown in Venn diagrams. Total ChIP-seq peak numbers are indicated below each antibody. D, CEAS analysis averaged the ChIP-seq tag density as average profile near the TSS (−3 to +3 kb) for H3K9ac near those genes that were up-regulated in MSC-B7 versus MSC (blue), down-regulated in MSC-B7 versus MSC (orange), up-regulated in MSC-F7 versus MSC (green), and down-regulated in MSC-F7 versus MSC (dark green) compared with all gene expression levels (black). Graphs were focused on genes that had an expression >0.1 linear value in the MSC-B7 (left) and MSC-F7 (right). Increased average profile score indicates greater tag density. Overlaid ChIP-seq tracks are displayed for H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K36me3 in the MSC (pink), MSC-B7 (blue), MSC-B15 (yellow), and MSC-F7 (green) cells at the Adipoq (E) and Lipe (F) genomic regions. Genomic location and scale are indicated (top), and maximum height of tag sequence density for each data track is indicated on the y axis (top left of each track, normalized to input and 107 tags). Gene transcriptional direction is indicated by an arrow, and exons are shown as boxes (top). G, CEAS analysis averaged ChIP-seq tag density as average profile near the TSS (−3 to +3 kb) for H3K9ac (left) and H3K4me3 (right) for those genes that were up-regulated in MSCs 1,25(OH)2D3 (1,25D3) versus vehicle (Veh) (red) and down-regulated in MSCs 1,25(OH)2D3 versus vehicle (orange). Genes with expression >0.1 linear value in the 1,25(OH)2D3 (solid line) are compared against the vehicle (dashed line). H, overlaid ChIP-seq tracks are displayed for VDR in MSC, MSC-B7, MSC-B15, and MSC-F7 treated with vehicle (yellow) or 1,25(OH)2D3 (blue), where the overlapping regions appear as green at the Mdfi genomic region.

Accompanying changes in the transcriptome, there were also differences in the amplitude of the epigenetic marks when comparing MSCs with either MSC-F7 cells or MSC-B7 cells, as seen in Fig. 5D. Here, TSSs were averaged across the genome (from +3 to −3 kb) using the CEAS analysis tool and compared using ChIP-seq tag densities, shown as “average profile.” Averaged H3K9ac data that span the TSSs of all genes appear as a black line and display a typical H3K9ac profile that is enriched before and immediately after the TSS (valley of activity directly over the TSS). However, an examination of the TSS region from genes that are regulated during differentiation into MSC-B7 cells (up-regulated, blue; down-regulated, yellow) and MSC-F7 cells (up-regulated, green; down-regulated, dark green) revealed specific enrichments of the H3K9ac mark at genes regulated in MSC-B7 compared with MSC-F7 cells (left). For genes regulated in MSC-F7 cells (right), H3K9ac enrichment was much greater than that seen in MSC-B7 cells. These genome-wide observations are best illustrated at the gene level at two loci that surround the Adipoq (adiponectin) (Fig. 5E) and Lipe (hormone-sensitive lipase) genes (Fig. 5F), which are highly and specifically up-regulated in MSC-F7 cells. ChIP-seq data overlaid track hubs for each differentiation state (MSC (pink), MSC-B7 (blue), MSC-B15 (yellow), and MSC-F7 (green)) for H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K36me3 revealed an increase in each histone mark specifically in MSC-F7 cells (enrichment of green). Although enrichment at the Adipoq locus was highly punctate for H4K5ac and H3K4me1 directly upstream of the TSS, overlapping PPARγ and C/EBPα binding sites, these histone marks were more broadly distributed across the Lipe gene locus.

Histone modifications are also predictive of activated loci after treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3. In Fig. 5G, CEAS-averaged TSS analysis was applied to genes that were up- or down-regulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment. Genes that were activated or up-regulated (red) by 1,25(OH)2D3 exhibited enrichments for both H3K9ac (left) and H3K4me3 (right) that were specific for 1,25(OH)2D3 (solid red line). Genes that were down-regulated (gold lines; 1,25(OH)2D3 (solid) and vehicle (dashed)) showed no enrichment for these histone modifications, which are typically associated with active chromatin. These data are highlighted through the ChIP-seq overlaid data tracks visualized in Fig. 5H. The histone marks H3K9ac and H3K4me3 are displayed near the Mdfi gene, which was recently profiled for its transcription factor binding (15). Mdfi is shown to contain potential enhancers near the TSS and upstream at −8 kb and is up-regulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 in virtually all of the differentiation states examined (MSC, 11-fold; MSC-B7, 13-fold; MSB-B15, 4.5-fold; MSC-F7, 12-fold; supplemental Table 1). The ChIP-seq data hub tracks, which contrast cells treated with either vehicle or 1,25(OH)2D3, reveal 1,25(OH)2D3-induced enrichment of H3K9ac (blue) at the −8 kb region in all differentiation states. H3K4me3 was selectively enriched only immediately downstream of the Mdfi TSS. Therefore, undifferentiated MSCs exhibit an epigenetic signature that resembles that seen in MSC-B7 cells, and histone modifications appear to be predictive of activated gene loci following both differentiation and hormone-induced treatments.

Epigenetic Patterns in MSCs Predict Lineage Preference for Osteoblastic Differentiation

There is growing evidence for an epigenetic preference that favors the differentiation of marrow-derived MSCs toward the osteoblast lineage in genes that are up-regulated by osteogenic differentiation. This stands in stark contrast to genes in MSCs that are selectively up-regulated following adipogenic differentiation. An excellent example of this contrast can be seen at the gene locus that encodes osteopontin (OPN, Spp1) in Fig. 6A as compared with the gene locus for Cebpa in Fig. 6B. ChIP-seq data hub tracks are presented for RXR, C/EBPβ, RUNX2, C/EBPα, PPARγ, H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K36me3 (top) in each differentiation state (MSC (pink), MSC-B7 (blue), MSC-B15 (yellow), and MSC-F7 (green)) as well as VDR and RXR (bottom) in the absence or presence of 1,25(OH)2D3. Spp1 is up-regulated following osteogenic differentiation (2–4-fold) and by 1,25 (OH)2D3 (4-fold) yet down-regulated during adipogenic differentiation (2-fold). The Spp1 genomic locus retains several putative enhancers located upstream of the TSS that are occupied by VDR/RXR, RUNX2, and C/EBPβ, as documented previously (15). The Spp1 gene is expressed in a wide variety of cell types, however, and may also manifest components responsible for cell type-selective expression. Thus, the more proximal enhancers contained ligand-activated VDR/RXR recruitment and histone modifications that remain unchanged relative to undifferentiated MSCs. However, enhancers at the −27 and −43 kb regions are also seen to bind additional transcription factors that include C/EBPβ and RUNX2 as well as PPARγ and C/EBPα. At these sites, the histone profiles for H3K9ac, H4K5ac, and H3K4me1 are unexpectedly more robust in MSC-F7 cells as compared with MSCs (green increased). The separation of these epigenetic marks to more proximal or more distal regions may provide distinct mechanisms of up-regulation (proximal) and down-regulation (distal) at the Spp1 gene in different cell types. The locus near the Cebpa gene, on the other hand, which is up-regulated in MSC-F7 cells ∼3-fold compared with its down-regulation in MSC-B7 cells (4-fold down-regulation) and MSC-B15 cells (11-fold down-regulation), is dominated by an increase in histone marks in MSC-F7 cells (green) and an increase in PPARγ at sites downstream of Cebpa. There is also a ligand-dependent binding of VDR/RXR downstream of Cebpa, despite the fact that Cebpa does not appear to be statistically up- or down-regulated by 1,25(OH)2D3 in any of these differentiated cell types (supplemental Table 1). We are therefore able to use chromatin signature marks similar to those found near Spp1 and Cebpa to accurately predict important genomic loci that might be essential for differentiation.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Spp1 and Cebpa display an enhancer preference for increases in histone modification markers and transcription factors. Top, overlaid ChIP-seq tracks are displayed for RXR, C/EBPβ, RUNX2, C/EBPα, PPARγ, H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K36me3 in the MSC (pink), MSC-B7 (blue), MSC-B15 (yellow), and MSC-F7 (green) cells. Bottom, overlaid ChIP-seq tracks are displayed for VDR in MSC, MSC-B7, MSC-B15, and MSC-F7 as well as RXR in MSCs treated with vehicle (Veh, yellow) or 1,25(OH)2D3 (1,25D3, blue), where the overlapping regions appear as green at the Spp1 (A) and Cebpa (B) genomic regions. Genomic location and scale are indicated (top), and maximum height of tag sequence density for each data track is indicated on the y axis (top left of each track, normalized to input and 107 tags). Gene transcriptional direction is indicated by an arrow, and exons are shown as boxes (top).

Transcriptomic and Epigenetic Plasticity in Trans-differentiated Cells

Following the genome-wide observation that MSC and MSC-B7 epigenetic profiles are similar, whereas MSC to MSC-F7 profiles exhibit more dramatic differences, we hypothesized that adipogenic differentiation might represent a more committed terminal state of differentiation than that seen in the osteoblast, a subset of which are known to differentiate further into bone lining cells or osteocytes. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted a series of trans-differentiation experiments wherein cells were grown in osteogenic (OM), adipogenic (AM), or standard growth medium lacking any added compounds (Basal) (Fig. 7) for 3 days and then cultured for an additional 7 days in medium that induced the alternative state of differentiation. We then stained the cells with either AR or ORO, isolated RNA for qPCR gene expression analysis, and subjected the cells to ChIP-qPCR analysis at days 0, 3, and 10, as summarized in Fig. 7A. As documented in Fig. 7B, we found that after 3 days in osteogenic medium, AR staining revealed, as expected, an extensive calcium deposition that resulted in dense bone nodules after 10 days in culture. When transferred to adipogenic medium, however, the cells began to form lipid droplets, as assessed by ORO staining as seen in Fig. 7B (right), indicating a change in morphology toward adipogenic cells. ORO staining was positive only in cells that had been exposed to the adipogenic medium and was highly efficient. In contrast, cells exposed to adipogenic medium (Fig. 7B) displayed lipid droplet formation and positive staining for ORO both at 3 days and at 10 days. However, adipogenic cells that were transferred back to basal (control) medium displayed a reduction in lipid droplet formation, whereas this stain was absent in the adipogenic cells that were transferred into osteogenic medium for 7 days. Indeed, the latter cells began to form dense bone mineral nodules and stained positive for AR.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

Cellular trans-differentiation was accompanied by morphological and transcriptomic changes. A, experimental design and overview. Marrow-derived cells were isolated, and MSCs were preserved through culturing. MSCs were then differentiated in osteogenic (OM) or adipogenic medium (AM) for 3 days. At this time, the cells were then switched to the opposing differentiation mixture for an additional 7 days (10 days total). Gene expression, ChIP assay, and staining were performed at days 0, 3, and 10. B, differentiated cells were stained with AR (left) and with ORO (right). All images were at 4× magnification. C, RT-qPCR was performed on cells that were differentiated throughout the time course focused on Spp1, Mmp13, Runx2, Cebpb, Pparg, Adipoq, Cebpa, and Lipe genes. MSCs without differentiation (D0, blue) are compared with cells cultured for 3 days in basal medium (Basal 3D, tan bounding box and first tan bar), osteogenic medium (OM 3D, gray bounding box and first gray bar), or adipogenic medium (AM 3D, green bounding box and first green bar). Cells were then differentiated for an additional 7 days as indicated with basal medium (B, tan), osteogenic medium (O, gray), or adipogenic medium (A, green). Data were completed in triplicate analysis ± S.E. Data are displayed as relative quantitation (RQ) normalized to β-actin (ΔΔCT). a, p < 0.05, 3 days versus 0 days by paired t test. *, p < 0.05, 7-day treatment versus 3 days within medium group by paired t test.

To confirm potential transcriptomic signatures, RT-qPCR was performed on samples acquired at 0, 3, and 10 days for genes relevant to osteogenic biology (Spp1, Mmp13, and Runx2) as well as those important for adipogenic identity (Cebpb, Pparg, Adipoq, Cebpa, and Lipe), displayed in Fig. 7C. Spp1 expression was increased 3-fold in control medium (tan bounding box) after 3 days (first tan bar), unchanged after an additional 7 days (second tan bar) in control medium, and further increased in osteogenic medium (black bar). The transition into adipogenic medium decreased Spp1 expression 4-fold (first tan bar versus green bar). In cells initially exposed to osteogenic medium (gray bounding box), Spp1 was elevated in response to a change to basal medium and elevated even further when subjected to osteogenic medium for a further 10 days. As with basal medium, the further exposure of osteogenic cells to adipogenic medium resulted in a strong repression of Spp1. Finally, Spp1 expression in adipogenic cells was only slightly elevated when the cells were further exposed to either basal or osteogenic medium for additional periods of time. Continual adipogenic medium exposure resulted in sustained suppression of Spp1 at 3 and 10 days. These relationships were also observed for the Mmp13 and Runx2 genes. Expression profiles for Cebpb, Pparg, Adipoq, Cebpa, and Lipe were dependent upon the presence of adipogenic medium and signaling and were increased regardless of when the adipogenic medium was applied.

In a final study, we utilized ChIP-qPCR analysis to evaluate the effects of trans-differentiation on key histone modifications. The experimental design and display were identical to those seen in Fig. 7C. Cells were subjected to a ChIP assay at days 0, 3, and 10 and immunoprecipitated with antibodies to H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K36me3 as well as with a nonspecific IgG control. As seen in Fig. 8A, the ChIP-qPCR primers used were located near the Spp1 TSS (−200/+100 bp), and the data displayed represent ChIP analysis for H3K9ac (top) and IgG control (bottom) at this site. The ChIP-qPCR results seen in Fig. 8A mirror the results of Spp1 gene expression seen in Fig. 7C. H3K9ac levels remained unchanged in cells that were treated with either basal (tan bounding box) or osteogenic (gray bounding box) medium for 3–10 days. Cells cultured in adipogenic medium (green bounding box), however, displayed a 4–5-fold decrease in histone acetylation, indicating a loss of transcriptional activity. The nonspecific IgG immunoprecipitation data demonstrate that these activities were specific because they remained unchanged during treatment conditions and were significantly lower than all immunoprecipitation samples. The IgG for the remaining regions was as low or lower than the data displayed for Spp1; therefore, this was omitted from the figure for clarity. In Fig. 8B, ChIP-qPCR analysis of marks for both H3K9ac and H3K4me3 was also performed using primers located near a region +500 bp downstream of the Lipe gene TSS. As seen in Fig. 8B, the data derived from this analysis also mirrored that seen for the expression of the Lipe gene in Fig. 7C. Histone marks were increased only in cells cultured in adipogenic medium, and these marks were increased even after mineral matrix began to form (OM 3D). Histone marks at the loci for the Cebpa (+2 kb) and Adipoq (TSS +0.5 kb and +11 kb) genes were also increased when adipogenic medium was applied regardless of the differentiation state. Taken together, the flexibility or plasticity of the epigenetic profiles enables MSCs to respond to alternative stimuli rather than to commit to a terminal differentiation process. Thus, MSCs are able to display cellular characteristics appropriate to mature mineralizing osteoblasts even after displaying adipogenic features that include the formation of ORO-positive lipid droplets.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8.

Trans-differentiation was assisted by genomic plasticity in histone modification markers. ChIP-qPCR was performed on the cells throughout differentiation at the indicated time points for H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K36me3. MSCs without differentiation (D0, blue) are compared with cells cultured for 3 days in basal medium (Basal 3D, tan bounding box and first tan bar), osteogenic medium (OM 3D, gray bounding box and first gray bar), or adipogenic medium (AM 3D, green bounding box and first green bar). Cells were then differentiated for an additional 7 days as indicated with basal medium (B, tan), osteogenic medium (O, gray), or adipogenic medium (A, green). A, qPCR was performed at the Spp1 TSS for H3K9ac (top) as well as an IgG (bottom). B, qPCR was performed at the Lipe TSS +0.5 kb region for H3K9ac (top) and H3K4me3 (bottom). C, qPCR was performed at the Cebpa +2 kb region for H3K9ac (top) and H3K36me3 (bottom). D, qPCR was performed at the Adipoq +0.5 kb region for H3K4me3 (top) and Adipoq +11 kb region for H3K36me3 (bottom). Data are displayed as quantity normalized to input in triplicate ± S.E. a, p < 0.05, 3 days versus 0 days by paired t test. *, p < 0.05, 7-day treatment versus 3 days within medium group by paired t test.

Discussion

Recent investigations into the differentiation of the osteoblast have revealed the presence of an intricate relationship between the transcription factors RUNX2, C/EBPβ, and VDR/RXR that is formed around genes important for osteoblast function and differentiation (15, 16). These studies were initially performed in the MC3T3-E1 cell model system in which the transition of preosteoblasts into mature mineralizing osteoblast cells was investigated. Similarly, there have been several studies utilizing the preadipocyte cell line 3T3-L1 to explore adipocyte differentiation with PPARγ, C/EBPα, and numerous additional transcription factors, including the VDR, as targets (22, 56, 57). The current model system of marrow-derived MSCs presented herein displays distinct advantages over both the MC3T3-E1 and the 3T3-L1 cell models. First, the multipotential nature of the MSCs allows an investigation of cellular transition into several different cell types using the same starting material. Second, marrow-derived MSCs can be isolated from transgenic or knock-out animal models, permitting investigations of the contributions of the genetic manipulations to the growth and differentiation of the cells (34). Finally, due to their accessibility from patients, the differentiation and reprogramming of MSCs ex vivo have become a focus in clinical therapeutics and drug discovery. For these reasons, we sought a thorough investigation of the mechanisms of gene activation, expression, genome binding, and epigenetic transitions in the differentiating MSCs and to provide a dense archive of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq that can be further deciphered by the research community because data on bone tissues are absent or limited from ENCODE data sets.

As we observed previously in the MC3T3-E1 cells (16) and as evidenced from the 3T3-L1 literature (22, 56, 57), transcription factors essential for osteogenic (RUNX2 and C/EBPβ) and/or adipogenic (PPARγ and C/EBPα) differentiation appear poised or are already present at many locations through the genome in undifferentiated MSCs regardless of their origin. During the process of differentiation, these factors either increase/decrease in abundance at specific enhancers or, with less frequency, bind at de novo sites. The peak overlap table (Table 1) demonstrates that although there are unique peaks of activity for each differentiation state, the majority of transcription factors are bound to the same enhancer locations, and if changes do occur, they are largely of amplitude. Examples of this behavior were apparent at the Adipoq gene locus seen in Fig. 3D. At this gene, however, PPARγ and RXR binding both increased from an existing residual level at specific sites (adjacent to the TSS and −3 kb) and occupied additional de novo sites (−1 kb) following MSC-F7 differentiation (green). We also found that many additional factors bound to the −3 kb enhancer upstream of Adipoq. Binding sites for factors such as VDR, RXR, C/EBPβ, and C/EBPα did not change in response to MSC differentiation, and all cell differentiation states were equally overlapping. Similar observations were made at the Mmp13 (Fig. 3D), Spp1 (Fig. 6A), and Cebpa (Fig. 6B) loci. Further studies using ChIP-re-ChIP, where ChIP is performed for one factor, followed by a second immunoprecipitation for a co-bound factor, would help reveal which of these factors are present at the same time and physically interacting on the same piece of DNA to further our understanding of the mechanism (58). However, it is important to remember that these factors may not be directly related to activity of genes in the same genomic vicinity. Interactions of chromatin modifiers (readers and writers for the histone marks) and other coactivators also operate during the activation. Perhaps other transcription factors and/or co-repressor presence are necessary for repression. Nonetheless, the presence and location of these essential factors provide the first level of mechanistic understanding, and their activities highlight the complexity of regulation and the potential coordination of several transcription factors that are frequently observed at thousands of locations throughout the genome.

Ligand activation of the VDR, a secondary activator and signal-dependent factor, and genomic binding with its RXR partner create a different gene activation dynamic in differentiated cells compared with parental MSCs. Although the genomic footprint of ligand-activated VDR is dramatically reduced (from 10,557 to 823 (MSC-B7), 1,365 (MSC-B15), and 616 (MSC-F7)), 1,25(OH)2D3-activated VDR is able to regulate similar numbers of genes in each cell type. These findings are consistent with data generated in the MC3T3-E1 cell line (15, 16) when these preosteoblast precursor cells were differentiated into mature osteoblastic mineralizing cells in osteogenic medium. The gene networks activated by 1,25(OH)2D3 in each differentiated cell type derived from the MSCs were distinct, with only 11 genes being up-regulated and one gene (Ibsp) down-regulated in common in each differentiation state. Finally, examination of the most common or overrepresented sequences in these peaks revealed that a typical VDRE was found to be the most abundant sequence located in 20–35% of the total peaks, which lends credence to the fidelity of this data set. These analyses, however, should not be misinterpreted to suggest that a VDRE was not found in the remaining 80–65% of the ChIP-seq peaks. A position weight matrix-based search found that >90% of all ChIP-seq peak sequences contained a DR3 type VDRE near the peak maxima or pairs of VDREs flanking the apparent peak center. These data are consistent with our previous conclusions regarding VDR cistromes in human LS180 colonic cells, mouse IDG-SW3 osteocytic cells, and mouse MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells (15, 47, 59). Interestingly, these regions are also enriched in sequences for AP1/Jun, RUNX2, and C/EBPβ motifs in the osteogenic differentiated cells (15). However, in the MSC-F7, sequence motifs for the transcription factors NKX2–5 (NK2 homeobox 5) and IRF5/6 (interferon regulatory factor 5 and 6) motifs were present. The NKX2–5 protein is involved in heart development (60). IRF5/6 transcription factors are involved in inflammatory pathway signal transduction (61). Despite the overrepresentation of these motifs in our data sets, each pathway will require extensive investigation to determine their contribution to VDR hormone signaling in adipocytes.

From a broad level of expression, epigenetic changes were a predictor of the important gene loci for differentiation. These histone marks result from the recruitment and activity of histone-modifying enzymes, such as histone acetyl- and methyltransferases, that are the readers and writers of the genome (62, 63). Detailed CEAS analysis of ChIP-seq enrichment near gene TSSs correlated well with genes that were regulated. The epigenetic profiles for MSC-B7 (7 days in osteogenic medium) were nearly indistinguishable from those seen in undifferentiated MSCs at genes that were up-regulated following osteoblast differentiation, including Mmp13 and Spp1, and near the Dmp1 (115-fold increase in MSC-B7 versus MSC) locus (ChIP-seq raw data). This was in contrast to observations made following adipogenic differentiation, where histone marks were specifically enriched around adipogenic genes, such as Adipoq, Lipe, Cidec, Cebpa, Fabp4, Klf15, Plin1, Pparg, Setd8, and many others (supplemental Table 1 and ChIP-seq raw data). In these studies, we focused on the process of activation in response to differentiation. Each histone mark provided insight into different aspects of chromatin regulation, such that ChIP-seq analysis of candidate transcription factors may not be necessary initially to understand the importance of the gene locus for differentiation. The H3K9ac and H4K5ac marks associated with active enhancers were duplicative in nature (activation); however, each mark revealed unique profiles. At the Adipoq gene locus, the H3K9ac mark exhibited its highest enrichment near the TSS coinciding with H3K4me3, whereas H4K5ac, while enriched at the TSS, was also increased at the upstream enhancers that also coincided with the H3K4me1 mark. Coupled with our factor occupancy data, it is clear that these regions are important for PPARγ and C/EBPα binding. Nevertheless, the importance of this region as an enhancer is implied even in the absence of these types of data. The dynamics of acetylation profiles (e.g. the punctate patterns at the Adipoq and Cebpa genes versus the broad histone profiles at the Lipe gene) facilitate the categorization of gene activities across the genome and create a hierarchy of genes involved in differentiation. It is possible that a diverse set of multiple enhancers and broad active chromatin may indicate a wider portfolio of responses to cellular stimuli and differentiation. The reverse of these activation marks are those that are involved in repression (H3K27me3) and silencing (H3K9me3). Although we did not examine repressive marks in these studies, their involvement would further illuminate the patterns necessary for the multipotential nature of the MSCs.

We believe that the activation dynamics identified in this study enhance an already attractive cell model system in which to study the epigenetic plasticity of MSC regulation. Whereas there is strong evidence for trans-differentiation of cells in vivo (3033), we also sought to define this process in response to the adipogenic or osteoblastic signaling growth mixtures at a mechanistic level. The environment, in our case the differentiation mixture, determined the phenotypic outcome, epigenetic restructuring, and therefore function analogous to macrophages that are deposited in different tissues and appear to acquire unique genetic and epigenetic features from their environment that determine their specific functions (64). This concept could be applicable to MSCs relative to their tissue origins. The epigenetically preprogrammed pathway for marrow-derived MSCs appears to be osteogenic; however, the potential for adipocyte differentiation remains intact, despite expression of the reported adipocyte defying Grem1 in the MSCs and MSC-B7 cells (40). This differentiation potential is highlighted in the pathology associated with skeletal fragility, including increased marrow adiposity due to less physical exertion, aging, and estrogen deficiency (6567). The marrow microenvironment and resulting MSCs may react and respond to the increased adiposity, causing an increase in the propensity for MSCs to become adipose or even for existing osteogenic cells to be trans-differentiated into fat. This in turn results in a cascade of signaling pathways being activated and changes in the expression and elaboration of Wnts/β-catenin, bone morphogenic proteins, and other growth factors that are capable of driving cells toward a clinically undesired outcome (6870).

Our original hypothesis that the adipogenic cells might be terminally and irreversibly committed appeared to be inaccurate because we were successful in transitioning adipocytes back into mineral matrix-depositing osteoblast-like cells. The cell morphology and staining patterns in these trans-differentiated cells were consistent with individual osteoblast versus adipocyte phenotypes. These transitions did not occur randomly, however, because differentiation was uniform across the plates, and the gene expression profiles were unequivocal for the appropriate cell type. For example, there were no lingering remnants of osteoblast expression in adipocyte trans-differentiated cells. The most interesting results found during the trans-differentiation process were in relationship to the profiles of histone marks. Despite examining these transitions with ChIP-qPCR rather than ChIP-seq analysis, we still found that epigenetic profiles mirrored the gene expression results at many locations (guided by the ChIP-seq for primer design). Because there was high expression of Adipoq in cells with an adipogenic medium mixture, the histone modifications decreased after the adipogenic signals were removed. In fact, this was true for all genes up-regulated by adipogenesis (Pparg, Cebpa, Lipe, and others (ChIP-seq raw data)), thereby demonstrating that epigenetic plasticity is required for these transitions. Importantly, these patterns of the transitioning MSC may contain unique epigenetic signatures that are dependent upon cellular origin (adipose, osteogenic, or chondrogenic), disease status (healthy or tumorigenic), or even their final site of localization (bone matrix, fat pad, or brain).

The identification of histone marks and accompanying signals, whether in vitro or in vivo, is vital to understanding gene regulation in a broader context. Genome-wide association studies undertake the difficult task of identifying regions of the genome, and more precisely SNPs, that have a higher correlation with certain disease risk groups. A majority of the SNPs that have been identified occur in the vastness of the non-coding portions of the genome (71). These SNPs can act as genomic beacons to highlight crucial enhancers, regulators, or structure for gene regulation and disease progression. Many enhancers may be connected through intergenic (or interchromosomal) loops, whereby SNPs may have far reaching, difficult-to-predict effects on gene expression. Our recent data utilizing CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) in the Mmp13 gene locus showed that disruption of the −30 kb RUNX2-bound enhancer was responsible for the altered binding activity of several additional transcription factors at the remaining distal enhancers and ultimately inactivation of transcription of the gene itself (43, 72). The presence of SNPs in regions that contain histone marks may be important in determining their specific functions and may help to determine mechanisms and perhaps guide therapeutic intervention.

In conclusion, the multipotential nature of MSCs creates a desirable model in which to study the formation of many different tissue types. We found that transcription factors required for each differentiation state were present in the undifferentiated MSCs and were poised for regulation. These genetic responses were the cause of, or reaction to, the epigenetic changes that drive the cellular transitions. The epigenetic profiles of the marrow-derived MSC closely resemble the osteogenic differentiated cells and indicate a default bone fate. The plasticity of these epigenetic marks allows the MSC to maintain its multipotential role and provide precursors for the various differentiated cell types as needed.

Experimental Procedures

Reagents

1,25(OH)2D3 was obtained from SAFC Global (Madison, WI). ChIP antibodies to VDR (C-20, sc-1008, lot G2511), RXR (ΔN-197, sc-774, lot G2310), C/EBPβ (C-19, sc-150, lot F3011), and C/EBPα (14AA, sc-61, lot J1811) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Dallas, TX). Antibodies to PPARγ (81B8, 2443s, lot 2) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Antibodies to H4K5ac (07-327, lot DAM1794310) and H3K9ac (06-942, lot 31636) were purchased from Millipore (Billerica, MA). Antibodies for H3K4me1 (ab8895, lot GR43807-1), H3K4me3 (ab1012, lot GR10853-1), and H3K36me3 (ab9050, lot GR52625-1) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). All quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) reagents (Fast Start SYBR Green Master Mix (w/rox)) were obtained from Roche Applied Science, and TaqMan gene expression assays were from Life Technologies (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). All qPCR was conducted on a StepOnePlus system from Applied Biosystems. Primers were obtained from IDT (Coralville, IA), and the sequences are available in supplemental Table 1.

Cell Culture and Differentiation

Marrow-derived MSCs were isolated from female C57bl/6 mice, cryopreserved, and expanded through no more than 10 passages (34, 35). The MSCs were cultured in minimum Eagle's medium α modification supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum from Hyclone (Logan, UT) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin from Invitrogen. For differentiation, cells were grown to confluence and then transferred to either osteogenic differentiation medium (10 mm β-glycerophosphate and 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid) or adipogenic differentiation medium (5 μg/ml insulin, 50 μm indomethacin, 0.1 μm dexamethasone) for the indicated periods, which was replenished every 2–3 days until the assay. Cells were stained with AR as reported previously (4). In addition, cells were also stained with ORO to detect the presence of lipids. Briefly, the cells were washed in PBS, fixed with 10% formaldehyde solution for 30 min at room temperature, incubated with 100% propylene glycol (Poly Scientific, Bay Shore, NY) for 5 min at room temperature, stained with 0.5% ORO solution (Poly Scientific) for 10 min at 60 °C, treated with 80% propylene glycol for 5 min at room temperature, washed with double-distilled H2O, and dried. All AR and ORO samples were imaged with a 4× objective.

Gene Expression Analysis

Cells were treated for 24 h with ethanol vehicle or 100 nm 1,25(OH)2D3, and 1 μg of isolated total RNA was reverse transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems) and then diluted to 100 μl with RNase/DNase-free water. qPCR was performed using primers specific for a select set of genes by TaqMan analyses as indicated and listed in supplemental Table 1.

ChIP Followed by Sequencing (ChIP-seq)

Chromatin immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously (47). Briefly, cells (both pre- and post-differentiation) were treated for 3 h with vehicle or 100 nm 1,25(OH)2D3 after differentiation as reported previously (50). Samples were subjected to immunoprecipitation using either a control IgG antibody or the indicated experimental antibody (15, 16). All ChIP and ChIP-seq methodology, including statistical information and data processing, were performed as reported recently (16).

RNA Sequencing

RNA-seq was performed as described previously (59, 73). MSCs were differentiated and treated for 24 h with vehicle or 100 nm 1,25(OH)2D3 before RNA was isolated using the TRI-Reagent protocol (MRC, Cincinnati, OH). Eight micrograms of total RNA were DNase I-treated (Invitrogen) and then ribosome-depleted using the RiboMinus eukaryote kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Directional RNA-seq libraries were prepared with the Epicenter (Madison, WI) ScriptSeq version 2 RNA-seq library preparation kit as per the manufacturer's instructions. Ribosomal RNA depletion (RNA 6000 Nano Kit) and final library quality (high sensitivity DNA kit) were quality-controlled using an Agilent Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA).

Author Contributions

M. B. M. conceived, coordinated, and performed the studies; processed bioinformatics data sets; and wrote the paper. N. A. B. performed all cellular differentiations and staining and ChIP and RNA analyses and created the ChIP-seq and RNA-seq libraries. B. S. and J. R. isolated and provided the MSCs and reviewed the manuscript. J. W. P. supervised and coordinated the project and reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the Pike laboratory for helpful discussion and contributions to the manuscript. We also thank the University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center DNA Sequencing Facility for providing ChIP-seq and RNA-seq facilities and services.

*

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK-072281 (to J. W. P.) and AR-066616 (to J. R.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Inline graphic

This article contains supplemental Table 1.

All ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data sets (including raw sequencing files, peaks, bedGraphs, and RPKMs) are published under SuperSeries GSE79815 in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). ChIP-seq track hubs are publicly available for this study on the UCSC Genome Browser hub repository.

2
The abbreviations used are:
MSC
mesenchymal stem cell
qPCR
quantitative PCR
CEAS
cis-regulatory element annotation system
TSS
transcriptional start site
C/EBP
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein
RUNX2
Runt-related transcription factor 2
PPAR
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
VDR
vitamin D receptor
1,25(OH)2D3
1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3
RNA-seq
RNA sequencing
ChIP-seq
ChIP sequencing
ORO
Oil Red O
AR
alizarin red
GO
gene ontology
RXR
retinoid X receptor
VDRE
vitamin D response element
H3K4me1 and H3K4me3
histone H3 Lys-4 methylated and trimethylated, respectively
H3K36m3
trimethylated histone H3 Lys-36
H3K9ac
acetylated histone H3 Lys-9
H4K5ac
acetylated histone H4 Lys-5.

References

  • 1. Pittenger M. F., Mackay A. M., Beck S. C., Jaiswal R. K., Douglas R., Mosca J. D., Moorman M. A., Simonetti D. W., Craig S., and Marshak D. R. (1999) Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284, 143–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lin C. S., Xin Z. C., Dai J., and Lue T. F. (2013) Commonly used mesenchymal stem cell markers and tracking labels: limitations and challenges. Histol. Histopathol. 28, 1109–1116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chamberlain G., Fox J., Ashton B., and Middleton J. (2007) Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells 25, 2739–2749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tontonoz P., Hu E., and Spiegelman B. M. (1994) Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPARγ2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell 79, 1147–1156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Rosen E. D., Sarraf P., Troy A. E., Bradwin G., Moore K., Milstone D. S., Spiegelman B. M., and Mortensen R. M. (1999) PPARγ is required for the differentiation of adipose tissue in vivo and in vitro. Mol. Cell 4, 611–617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Komori T. (2010) Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by Runx2. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 658, 43–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Komori T., Yagi H., Nomura S., Yamaguchi A., Sasaki K., Deguchi K., Shimizu Y., Bronson R. T., Gao Y. H., Inada M., Sato M., Okamoto R., Kitamura Y., Yoshiki S., and Kishimoto T. (1997) Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 89, 755–764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Visweswaran M., Pohl S., Arfuso F., Newsholme P., Dilley R., Pervaiz S., and Dharmarajan A. (2015) Multi-lineage differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells: to Wnt, or not Wnt. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 68, 139–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Case N., and Rubin J. (2010) β-Catenin: a supporting role in the skeleton. J. Cell. Biochem. 110, 545–553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hanada K., Dennis J. E., and Caplan A. I. (1997) Stimulatory effects of basic fibroblast growth factor and bone morphogenetic protein-2 on osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 12, 1606–1614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kondo M., Yamaoka K., Sakata K., Sonomoto K., Lin L., Nakano K., and Tanaka Y. (2015) Contribution of the interleukin-6/STAT-3 signaling pathway to chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67, 1250–1260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sen B., Xie Z., Uzer G., Thompson W. R., Styner M., Wu X., and Rubin J. (2015) Intranuclear actin regulates osteogenesis. Stem Cells 33, 3065–3076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Case N., Thomas J., Xie Z., Sen B., Styner M., Rowe D., and Rubin J. (2013) Mechanical input restrains PPARγ2 expression and action to preserve mesenchymal stem cell multipotentiality. Bone 52, 454–464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Styner M., Meyer M. B., Galior K., Case N., Xie Z., Sen B., Thompson W. R., Pike J. W., and Rubin J. (2012) Mechanical strain downregulates C/EBPβ in MSC and decreases endoplasmic reticulum stress. PLoS One 7, e51613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Meyer M. B., Benkusky N. A., Lee C. H., and Pike J. W. (2014) Genomic determinants of gene regulation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 during osteoblast-lineage cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 19539–19554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Meyer M. B., Benkusky N. A., and Pike J. W. (2014) The RUNX2 cistrome in osteoblasts: characterization, down-regulation following differentiation, and relationship to gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 16016–16031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Matthews D. G., D'Angelo J., Drelich J., and Welsh J. (2015) Adipose-specific Vdr deletion alters body fat and enhances mammary epithelial density. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.1009.1035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Narvaez C. J., Matthews D., Broun E., Chan M., and Welsh J. (2009) Lean phenotype and resistance to diet-induced obesity in vitamin D receptor knockout mice correlates with induction of uncoupling protein-1 in white adipose tissue. Endocrinology 150, 651–661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sato M., and Hiragun A. (1988) Demonstration of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor-like molecule in ST 13 and 3T3 L1 preadipocytes and its inhibitory effects on preadipocyte differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 135, 545–550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kaneko I., Sabir M. S., Dussik C. M., Whitfield G. K., Karrys A., Hsieh J. C., Haussler M. R., Meyer M. B., Pike J. W., and Jurutka P. W. (2015) 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D regulates expression of the tryptophan hydroxylase 2 and leptin genes: implication for behavioral influences of vitamin D. FASEB J. 29, 4023–4035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wu H., Whitfield T. W., Gordon J. A., Dobson J. R., Tai P. W., van Wijnen A. J., Stein J. L., Stein G. S., and Lian J. B. (2014) Genomic occupancy of Runx2 with global expression profiling identifies a novel dimension to control of osteoblastogenesis. Genome Biol. 15, R52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Nielsen R., and Mandrup S. (2014) Genome-wide profiling of transcription factor binding and epigenetic marks in adipocytes by ChIP-seq. Methods Enzymol. 537, 261–279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Dudakovic A., Camilleri E. T., Xu F., Riester S. M., McGee-Lawrence M. E., Bradley E. W., Paradise C. R., Lewallen E. A., Thaler R., Deyle D. R., Larson A. N., Lewallen D. G., Dietz A. B., Stein G. S., Montecino M. A., Westendorf J. J., and van Wijnen A. J. (2015) Epigenetic control of skeletal development by the histone methyltransferase Ezh2. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 27604–27617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Rojas A., Aguilar R., Henriquez B., Lian J. B., Stein J. L., Stein G. S., van Wijnen A. J., van Zundert B., Allende M. L., and Montecino M. (2015) Epigenetic control of the bone-master Runx2 gene during osteoblast-lineage commitment by the histone demethylase JARID1B/KDM5B. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 28329–28342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Thompson B., Varticovski L., Baek S., and Hager G. L. (2016) Genome-wide chromatin landscape transitions identify novel pathways in early commitment to osteoblast differentiation. PLoS One 11, e0148619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Calo E., and Wysocka J. (2013) Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol. Cell 49, 825–837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bieszczad K. M., Bechay K., Rusche J. R., Jacques V., Kudugunti S., Miao W., Weinberger N. M., McGaugh J. L., and Wood M. A. (2015) Histone deacetylase inhibition via RGFP966 releases the brakes on sensory cortical plasticity and the specificity of memory formation. J. Neurosci. 35, 13124–13132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Masri S., Zocchi L., Katada S., Mora E., and Sassone-Corsi P. (2012) The circadian clock transcriptional complex: metabolic feedback intersects with epigenetic control. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1264, 103–109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Nakahata Y., Grimaldi B., Sahar S., Hirayama J., and Sassone-Corsi P. (2007) Signaling to the circadian clock: plasticity by chromatin remodeling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 230–237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Feil S., Fehrenbacher B., Lukowski R., Essmann F., Schulze-Osthoff K., Schaller M., and Feil R. (2014) Transdifferentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells to macrophage-like cells during atherogenesis. Circ. Res. 115, 662–667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ortiz-Gonzalez X. R., Keene C. D., Verfaillie C. M., and Low W. C. (2004) Neural induction of adult bone marrow and umbilical cord stem cells. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 1, 207–213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Dhanasekaran M., Indumathi S., Harikrishnan R., Mishra R., Lissa R. P., Rajkumar J. S., and Sudarsanam D. (2013) Human omentum fat-derived mesenchymal stem cells transdifferentiates into pancreatic islet-like cluster. Cell Biochem. Funct. 31, 612–619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Peng T., Zhu G., Dong Y., Zeng J., Li W., Guo W., Chen Y., Duan M., Hocher B., and Xie D. (2015) BMP4: a possible key factor in differentiation of auditory neuron-like cells from bone-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Clin. Lab. 61, 1171–1178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Case N., Xie Z., Sen B., Styner M., Zou M., O'Conor C., Horowitz M., and Rubin J. (2010) Mechanical activation of β-catenin regulates phenotype in adult murine marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Orthop. Res. 28, 1531–1538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Peister A., Mellad J. A., Larson B. L., Hall B. M., Gibson L. F., and Prockop D. J. (2004) Adult stem cells from bone marrow (MSCs) isolated from different strains of inbred mice vary in surface epitopes, rates of proliferation, and differentiation potential. Blood 103, 1662–1668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Warde-Farley D., Donaldson S. L., Comes O., Zuberi K., Badrawi R., Chao P., Franz M., Grouios C., Kazi F., Lopes C. T., Maitland A., Mostafavi S., Montojo J., Shao Q., Wright G., Bader G. D., and Morris Q. (2010) The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W214–W220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Huang da W., Sherman B. T., Stephens R., Baseler M. W., Lane H. C., and Lempicki R. A. (2008) DAVID gene ID conversion tool. Bioinformation 2, 428–430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Dennis G. Jr., Sherman B. T., Hosack D. A., Yang J., Gao W., Lane H. C., and Lempicki R. A. (2003) DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol. 4, P3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Thompson W. R., Uzer G., Brobst K. E., Xie Z., Sen B., Yen S. S., Styner M., and Rubin J. (2015) Osteocyte specific responses to soluble and mechanical stimuli in a stem cell-derived culture model. Sci. Rep. 5, 11049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Worthley D. L., Churchill M., Compton J. T., Tailor Y., Rao M., Si Y., Levin D., Schwartz M. G., Uygur A., Hayakawa Y., Gross S., Renz B. W., Setlik W., Martinez A. N., Chen X., et al. (2015) Gremlin 1 identifies a skeletal stem cell with bone, cartilage, and reticular stromal potential. Cell 160, 269–284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Madsen M. S., Siersbæk R., Boergesen M., Nielsen R., and Mandrup S. (2014) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and C/EBPα synergistically activate key metabolic adipocyte genes by assisted loading. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 939–954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Siersbaek R., Baek S., Rabiee A., Nielsen R., Traynor S., Clark N., Sandelin A., Jensen O. N., Sung M. H., Hager G. L., and Mandrup S. (2014) Molecular architecture of transcription factor hotspots in early adipogenesis. Cell Rep. 7, 1434–1442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Meyer M. B., Benkusky N. A., and Pike J. W. (2015) Selective distal enhancer control of the Mmp13 gene identified through clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) genomic deletions. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 11093–11107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. McLean C. Y., Bristor D., Hiller M., Clarke S. L., Schaar B. T., Lowe C. B., Wenger A. M., and Bejerano G. (2010) GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495–501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Huang da W., Sherman B. T., and Lempicki R. A. (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Arbour N. C., Prahl J. M., and DeLuca H. F. (1993) Stabilization of the vitamin D receptor in rat osteosarcoma cells through the action of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 1307–1312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Meyer M. B., Goetsch P. D., and Pike J. W. (2012) VDR/RXR and TCF4/β-catenin cistromes in colonic cells of colorectal tumor origin: impact on c-FOS and c-MYC gene expression. Mol. Endocrinol. 26, 37–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Meyer M. B., Goetsch P. D., and Pike J. W. (2010) Genome-wide analysis of the VDR/RXR cistrome in osteoblast cells provides new mechanistic insight into the actions of the vitamin D hormone. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 121, 136–141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Cartharius K., Frech K., Grote K., Klocke B., Haltmeier M., Klingenhoff A., Frisch M., Bayerlein M., and Werner T. (2005) MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics 21, 2933–2942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Meyer M. B., Watanuki M., Kim S., Shevde N. K., and Pike J. W. (2006) The human transient receptor potential vanilloid type 6 distal promoter contains multiple vitamin D receptor binding sites that mediate activation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in intestinal cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 20, 1447–1461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Meyer M. B., Goetsch P. D., and Pike J. W. (2010) A downstream intergenic cluster of regulatory enhancers contributes to the induction of CYP24A1 expression by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 15599–15610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Zella L. A., Meyer M. B., Nerenz R. D., Lee S. M., Martowicz M. L., and Pike J. W. (2010) Multifunctional enhancers regulate mouse and human vitamin D receptor gene transcription. Mol. Endocrinol. 24, 128–147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kim S., Yamazaki M., Zella L. A., Meyer M. B., Fretz J. A., Shevde N. K., and Pike J. W. (2007) Multiple enhancer regions located at significant distances upstream of the transcriptional start site mediate RANKL gene expression in response to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 103, 430–434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Ji X., Li W., Song J., Wei L., and Liu X. (2006) CEAS: cis-regulatory element annotation system. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W551–W554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Håkelien A. M., Bryne J. C., Harstad K. G., Lorenz S., Paulsen J., Sun J., Mikkelsen T. S., Myklebost O., and Meza-Zepeda L. A. (2014) The regulatory landscape of osteogenic differentiation. Stem Cells 32, 2780–2793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Lefterova M. I., Haakonsson A. K., Lazar M. A., and Mandrup S. (2014) PPARγ and the global map of adipogenesis and beyond. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 25, 293–302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Nielsen R., Pedersen T. A., Hagenbeek D., Moulos P., Siersbaek R., Megens E., Denissov S., Børgesen M., Francoijs K. J., Mandrup S., and Stunnenberg H. G. (2008) Genome-wide profiling of PPARγ:RXR and RNA polymerase II occupancy reveals temporal activation of distinct metabolic pathways and changes in RXR dimer composition during adipogenesis. Genes Dev. 22, 2953–2967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Métivier R., Penot G., Hübner M. R., Reid G., Brand H., Kos M., and Gannon F. (2003) Estrogen receptor-α directs ordered, cyclical, and combinatorial recruitment of cofactors on a natural target promoter. Cell 115, 751–763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. St John H. C., Meyer M. B., Benkusky N. A., Carlson A. H., Prideaux M., Bonewald L. F., and Pike J. W. (2015) The parathyroid hormone-regulated transcriptome in osteocytes: parallel actions with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 to oppose gene expression changes during differentiation and to promote mature cell function. Bone 72, 81–91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Lyons I., Parsons L. M., Hartley L., Li R., Andrews J. E., Robb L., and Harvey R. P. (1995) Myogenic and morphogenetic defects in the heart tubes of murine embryos lacking the homeo box gene Nkx2-5. Genes Dev. 9, 1654–1666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Boonyatecha N., Sangphech N., Wongchana W., Kueanjinda P., and Palaga T. (2012) Involvement of Notch signaling pathway in regulating IL-12 expression via c-Rel in activated macrophages. Mol. Immunol. 51, 255–262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Berndsen C. E., and Denu J. M. (2008) Catalysis and substrate selection by histone/protein lysine acetyltransferases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 682–689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Dekker F. J., and Haisma H. J. (2009) Histone acetyl transferases as emerging drug targets. Drug Discov. Today 14, 942–948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Gosselin D., Link V. M., Romanoski C. E., Fonseca G. J., Eichenfield D. Z., Spann N. J., Stender J. D., Chun H. B., Garner H., Geissmann F., and Glass C. K. (2014) Environment drives selection and function of enhancers controlling tissue-specific macrophage identities. Cell 159, 1327–1340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Styner M., Thompson W. R., Galior K., Uzer G., Wu X., Kadari S., Case N., Xie Z., Sen B., Romaine A., Pagnotti G. M., Rubin C. T., Styner M. A., Horowitz M. C., and Rubin J. (2014) Bone marrow fat accumulation accelerated by high fat diet is suppressed by exercise. Bone 64, 39–46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Schwartz A. V., Sigurdsson S., Hue T. F., Lang T. F., Harris T. B., Rosen C. J., Vittinghoff E., Siggeirsdottir K., Sigurdsson G., Oskarsdottir D., Shet K., Palermo L., Gudnason V., and Li X. (2013) Vertebral bone marrow fat associated with lower trabecular BMD and prevalent vertebral fracture in older adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 98, 2294–2300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Trudel G., Payne M., Mädler B., Ramachandran N., Lecompte M., Wade C., Biolo G., Blanc S., Hughson R., Bear L., and Uhthoff H. K. (2009) Bone marrow fat accumulation after 60 days of bed rest persisted 1 year after activities were resumed along with hemopoietic stimulation: the Women International Space Simulation for Exploration study. J. Appl. Physiol. 107, 540–548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Chen J., and Long F. (2013) β-catenin promotes bone formation and suppresses bone resorption in postnatal growing mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 28, 1160–1169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Tong J., Li W., Vidal C., Yeo L. S., Fatkin D., and Duque G. (2011) Lamin A/C deficiency is associated with fat infiltration of muscle and bone. Mech. Ageing Dev. 132, 552–559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Yeung D. K., Griffith J. F., Antonio G. E., Lee F. K., Woo J., and Leung P. C. (2005) Osteoporosis is associated with increased marrow fat content and decreased marrow fat unsaturation: a proton MR spectroscopy study. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 22, 279–285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Tak Y. G., and Farnham P. J. (2015) Making sense of GWAS: using epigenomics and genome engineering to understand the functional relevance of SNPs in non-coding regions of the human genome. Epigenetics Chromatin 8, 57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Meyer M. B., Benkusky N. A., Onal M., and Pike J. W. (2015) Selective regulation of Mmp13 by 1,25(OH)2D3, PTH, and Osterix through distal enhancers. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.1009.1001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. St John H. C., Bishop K. A., Meyer M. B., Benkusky N. A., Leng N., Kendziorski C., Bonewald L. F., and Pike J. W. (2014) The osteoblast to osteocyte transition: epigenetic changes and response to the vitamin D3 hormone. Mol. Endocrinol. 28, 1150–1165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES