Skip to main content
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology logoLink to American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
. 2017 Aug;57(2):193–203. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0404OC

Integrated Stress Response Mediates Epithelial Injury in Mechanical Ventilation

Tamas Dolinay 1, Blanca E Himes 2, Maya Shumyatcher 2, Gladys Gray Lawrence 3, Susan S Margulies 3,
PMCID: PMC5576586  PMID: 28363030

Abstract

Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is a severe complication of mechanical ventilation that can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome. VILI is characterized by damage to the epithelial barrier with subsequent pulmonary edema and profound hypoxia. Available lung-protective ventilator strategies offer only a modest benefit in preventing VILI because they cannot impede alveolar overdistension and concomitant epithelial barrier dysfunction in the inflamed lung regions. There are currently no effective biochemical therapies to mitigate injury to the alveolar epithelium. We hypothesize that alveolar stretch activates the integrated stress response (ISR) pathway and that the chemical inhibition of this pathway mitigates alveolar barrier disruption during stretch and mechanical ventilation. Using our established rat primary type I–like alveolar epithelial cell monolayer stretch model and in vivo rat mechanical ventilation that mimics the alveolar overdistension seen in acute respiratory distress syndrome, we studied epithelial responses to mechanical stress. Our studies revealed that the ISR signaling pathway is a key modulator of epithelial permeability. We show that prolonged epithelial stretch and injurious mechanical ventilation activate the ISR, leading to increased alveolar permeability, cell death, and proinflammatory signaling. Chemical inhibition of protein kinase RNA–like endoplasmic reticulum kinase, an upstream regulator of the pathway, resulted in decreased injury signaling and improved barrier function after prolonged cyclic stretch and injurious mechanical ventilation. Our results provide new evidence that therapeutic targeting of the ISR can mitigate VILI.

Keywords: ventilator-induced lung injury, integrated stress response, alveolar epithelium


Clinical Relevance

Alveolar epithelial barrier damage is central to the pathology of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Despite lung-protective ventilation strategies, ventilator-induced lung injury contributes to ARDS by overdistending the alveolar epithelium in the inflamed lung regions. Our results show that the integrated stress response pathway is a key mediator of injury signals in epithelial cells in response to ventilator-induced lung injury. Targeted inhibition of the integrated stress response provides a new therapeutic approach to prevent ARDS.

Alveolar epithelial barrier injury is central to the pathology of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which results in severe hypoxia and pulmonary edema formation (1). ARDS, which affects an estimated 190,000 patients in the United States annually, usually presents as a complication of mechanical ventilation in sepsis that contributes to multiple organ failure syndrome (2). Human studies showed that low-tidal-volume mechanical ventilation improves survival in ARDS (3), but imaging analysis revealed that even lung-protective ventilation can cause alveolar overdistension and injury in the inflamed regions of the lung (4), leading to alveolar barrier damage in some cases (5, 6). Despite extensive research, we do not have biochemical strategies to protect the alveolar–epithelial barrier.

The integrated stress response (ISR) is a highly conserved intracellular regulator of four common cell stressors in eukaryotes: the unfolded protein response (UPR), amino acid starvation, anemia (i.e., heme deficiency), and double-stranded DNA (e.g., viral infection). We focused our attention on the UPR because it is induced by hypoxia (7), a well-known factor associated with the pathogenesis of ARDS. The UPR has three cytosolic sensors: protein kinase RNA–like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring protein-1α (IRE1α), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). Because the PERK-activated response to unfolded protein stress regulates protein translation as part of the ISR signaling cascade, we focus on the downstream effects of PERK pathway-associated ISR in our studies. In this feedback pathway, others have shown that increased and aberrant (unfolded) protein load in the endoplasmic reticulum results in PERK activation and phosphorylation of the α-subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor-2α (p-EIF2α), producing a temporary cessation of EIF2 complex–mediated protein translation (8). As a result of a general decrease in protein translation, transcription factors such as activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and CCAAT/Enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP) are selectively translated to promote RNA transcription of growth arrest and DNA damage–inducible protein (GADD34), which then restores protein synthesis by dephosphorylation of EIF2α when transiently activated (7). Continuous activation of the system by persistent UPR, however, results in cell death and activates the innate immune system (9). Epithelial CHOP-mediated signaling has been implicated in the pathology of lung diseases, including pulmonary fibrosis (10) and hyperoxia-induced lung injury (11), but its role in stretch-induced injury is unknown.

In this study we describe, for the first time, ISR activation in alveolar epithelial cells exposed to mechanical stretch in vitro, and extend our findings to an in vivo ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) model to reveal mechanistic links of ISR to VILI pathology and, most importantly, show that inhibition of the ISR pathway provides a new therapeutic target in ARDS.

Materials and Methods

All protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Pennsylvania. Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 174, 250–300 g) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Horsham, PA).

Alveolar Epithelial Monolayer Mechanical Stretch Protocol

Epithelial monolayers were prepared from freshly isolated rat type II pneumocytes (n = 106 rats) as previously described (12). In brief, isolated pneumocytes were cultured on fibronectin-coated silastic membranes. The cells transformed into type I–like alveolar epithelial cells (AEC-I) and formed monolayers, expressing only AEC-I surface markers (13). Monolayers were exposed to 25% stretch for 6 hours or used as unstretched controls. Time controls were stretched 1 or 12 hours. Additional monolayers were pretreated with PERK inhibitor GSK2606414 (PI; EMD Millipore, Danvers, MA) or its vehicle (0.01% DMSO). Tunicamycin-treated cells served as an ISR-positive benchmark. In gene-silencing studies, we pretreated monolayers with PERK, ATF4, CHOP, or nontargeting siRNA (Dharmacon, Pittsburgh, PA). Culture media were analyzed using a multiplex bead assay (Millipore) for cytokines. Western blotting was performed on total cell protein using antibodies for phosphorylated (p)- and total (t)-EIF2α and PERK (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); p- and t-IRE1α, and XBP1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA); ATF4 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); and CHOP and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA) as previously described (1416). Immunoprecipitation was performed for PERK (Santa Cruz) using the Pierce Classic IP kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA; see online supplement).

Paracellular Permeability and Cell Death Studies

To detect stretch-induced permeability changes, cells were plated on biotin-containing fibronectin and permeability was detected when apical fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled streptavidin (ThermoFisher) increased binding to basal biotin. Cell death was assessed with ethidium homodimer-calcein-AM stain (ThermoFisher). Florescent light emission was captured with a Nikon TE300 microscope (Melville, NY) and quantified (see online supplement).

PERK Inhibitor Treatment and Mechanical Ventilation Protocol

Rats were pretreated with 30 mg/kg PI (GSK Pharmaceuticals, Collegeville, PA) or its vehicle via gavage (n = 32). Subsequently, the animals received mechanical ventilation (4 h, 20 ml/kg tidal volume) via tracheostomy (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) or were allowed to breathe spontaneously. The rats were killed and samples were obtained for analysis (see online supplement). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were used for cell counts and protein content measurements. BAL and serum interleukin (IL)-18 were quantified by ELISA (Ray Biotech, Norcross, GA). Western blotting was performed on tissue protein for p-EIF2α, ATF4, CHOP, and β-actin as explained above. Lung slides were prepared for immunofluorescence and hematoxylin-eosin staining. In a separate experiment (n = 36), endo/epithelial permeability was measured with FITC-labeled albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) extravasation (see online supplement).

RNA Analysis

We obtained global quantitative mRNA measures via QuantSeq (Lexogen, Vienna, Austria). Sequencing libraries were prepared from AEC-I total RNA. Reads were aligned with STAR (v.2.5.1b) to the reference Rattus norvegicus build 6, and the DESeq2 R package was used to measure the significance of differentially expressed genes between the stretched and unstretched samples (17). The data are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE89024. Il18 gene expression of PERK siRNA-treated and control cells was performed with TaqMan PCR (see online supplement).

Statistics

For comparative studies of densitometry, cytokine levels, quantitative PCR, and cell count, we used the Kruskal–Wallis test for multigroup comparisons, and analyzed intergroup differences using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For fluorescent image intensity analysis, we used ANOVA (JMP Software, Cary, NC). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. The significance level was P < 0.05.

Results

To identify genes and associated intracellular pathways that mediate injury signaling in the alveolar epithelium, we used QuantSeq to compare the gene-expression profile of mechanically stretched AEC-I monolayers with that of unstretched controls. Cells were exposed to a biaxial cyclic (15/min) stretch for 6 hours with a 25% surface area change. This stretch magnitude corresponds to an 80% increase in total rat lung capacity, or 15 ml/kg positive-pressure mechanical ventilation (12). A Gene ontology enrichment analysis of the 924 differentially expressed genes (see Table E1 in the online supplement) showed that AEC-I cells respond to mechanical stretch primarily by regulating genes of cellular stress pathways (Tables 1 and E2). Among these genes were Atf4 and Chop (aka DNA damage–inducible transcript 3, Ddit3), two transcription factors of the ISR pathway. The ISR pathway is a central integrator of cellular stress responses, and it has been implicated in the pathology of lung diseases (18). To validate the increase in mRNA expression that we observed in Atf4 and Chop, we obtained results from previous microarray studies performed on stretched AEC-I (25% surface area change for 6 h) (19) and on mouse lungs ventilated with 10 ml/kg positive pressure and 2 cm H2O positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) for 8 hours (20). Both mechanical stretch and mechanical ventilation resulted in significantly increased mRNA expression of Atf4 (2.4- and 1.6-fold, respectively) and Chop (5.0- and 1.8-fold, respectively) compared with untreated controls (adjusted P value < 0.05; statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA and Welch’s two-sample t test, respectively). When Dombroski and colleagues (21) treated immortalized B cells with tunicamycin (4 μg/ml for 18 h), a universal trigger of ISR, they found similar increases in the expression of Atf4 and Chop genes (2.5- and 8.2-fold, respectively; adjusted P value < 0.05 via Bonferroni-corrected ANOVA). Consequently, we hypothesized that inhibition of ISR signaling would mitigate epithelial injury.

Table 1.

Mechanical Stretch Induces Lung Injury–Specific Gene Transcription in AEC-I

Gene Ontology Category* Percent of Significant Genes (%) Representative Genes in Functional Groups Fold Change (S versus NS)
Cation binding 18.75 Rhobtb1 0.51
Nuclear lumen 7.8 Areg 1.77
Cell death 7.57 Gadd45 0.35
Regulation of transcription 6.73 Atf4 1.94
    Ddit3 (Chop) 1.75
mRNA processing 1.92 Ccl3 (Mip1a) 3.9
    Il1a 2.55
    Il1b 1.97
Steroid metabolism 1.08 Ptgs2 (Cox2) 3.36
Protein kinase activity 0.96 Map3k8 2.68
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition 0.6 Cldn18 0.57
    Cldn23 0.5
    Cldn1 1.54

Definition of abbreviation: AEC-I, type I–like alveolar epithelial cells.

*

Gene Ontology (GO) categories significantly enriched with genes after mechanical stretch (S) compared with unstretched (NS) controls. Representative genes of interest with fold change S versus NS in expression are shown. The complete gene list is provided in Table E1. Significance analysis was performed with the DESeq2 program package, adjusted P value < 0.05. GO functional grouping was performed with NIH DAVID. The complete GO analysis is shown in Table E2. n = 5 biological replicates/condition.

Cyclic Stretch Activates ISR Signaling

To study epithelial stress signaling in response to mechanical stretch, we first investigated the mechanism of ATF4 and CHOP activation in our in vitro cell stretch model. The phosphorylation of PERK and EIF2α, as well as the expression of ATF4 and CHOP, was compared between stretched and unstretched monolayers. We used tunicamycin (1 μg/ml pretreatment for 24 h), a canonical activator of cell stress signals, as a positive control to benchmark the magnitude of ISR activation by mechanical stretch. We found that cyclic stretch resulted in increased PERK, EIF2α phosphorylation, and subsequent ISR signaling, similar to what was seen with tunicamycin (Figures 1A–1E). To evaluate the role of PERK-independent stress signaling in our model, we measured IRE-1α phosphorylation and the activation of its downstream transcription factor, factor X-box binding protein-1 (XBP1). Mechanical stretch did not increase IRE-1α phosphorylation or XBP1 expression (Figures 1A, 1E, and 1F). We next assessed the time dependence of ISR signaling in response to stretch. We found that cyclic stretch activated ISR in a time-dependent manner by increasing p-EIF2α, ATF4, and CHOP significantly by 6 hours (Figures 1H–1K). To assess cell death–mediated ISR activation, we stained monolayers with ethidium homodimer. Substantial cell death was not detected before 12 hours (Figure 1L). These findings suggest that the PERK/p- EIF2α/ATF4/CHOP cascade is a stretch-induced transmitter of mechanical stress signals in the epithelium.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mechanical stretch activates integrated stress response (ISR) signaling independently of the inositol-requiring protein-1α (IRE1α) pathway in primary alveolar type I–like epithelial (AEC-I) cells. AEC-I cells were cultured on silastic membranes coated with fibronectin to form monolayers. (A) Monolayers were subjected to biaxial stretch for 6 hours with a 25% surface change (S) and compared with unstretched controls (NS). Low-dose tunicamycin (TN, 1 μg/ml, 24 h treatment) was used as a positive control, and parameters were compared with DMSO-treated (0.01%), unstretched vehicle controls (VC). Mechanical stretch significantly increased the phosphorylation of protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (p-PERK), which resulted in activation of ISR marked by eukaryotic initiation factor-2α phosphorylation (p-EIF2α) and the activation of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP). Mechanical stretch did not affect phosphorylation of IRE1α (p-IRE1α) or activation of its downstream transcription factor, X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1). Quantified densities are shown in B–G. (H) Mechanical stretch activates the ISR in a time-dependent fashion in AEC-I monolayers. We detected time-dependent increases in p-EIF2α, ATF4, and CHOP after biaxial mechanical stretch with a 25% surface change for 1–12 hours. Maximum changes were observed at 6 hours. Quantified densities are shown in I–K. (L) Only a mild increase in cell death was detected at 6 hours with ethidium homodimer staining, but it increased to high levels by the 12-hour time point. We used total (t)-PERK, t-EIF2α, t-IRE1α, and β-actin as loading controls. Statistics: the Kruskal–Wallis test was performed for multiple-group comparison, and intergroup differences were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. n = 6–8 biological monolayer replicates/condition; * represents a significant increase in protein phosphorylation (B, C, F, and I), protein expression (D, E, G, J, and K), and cell death percentage (L); P < 0.05. Data are presented as averaged values ± SEM.

PERK Inhibition Blunts ISR Activation and Improves Epithelial Barrier Function

To evaluate whether stretch-induced PERK activation affects epithelial monolayer barrier integrity, we treated monolayers with siRNA specific to PERK and compared the results with those obtained from the nontargeting siRNA treatment (Figures 2A and 2B). Monolayer integrity was studied via FITC-labeled streptavidin binding to biotin. An intact epithelial monolayer barrier excluded streptavidin from interacting with membrane-bound biotin, but stretch disrupted cell–cell contacts, allowing binding of the two molecules at the basal surface, resulting in quantifiable FITC emission. PERK inhibition improved monolayer dysfunction (Figure 2C). We next tested whether PI, a specific chemical inhibitor of PERK phosphorylation, can be used to inhibit ISR activation. We observed that PI treatment decreased p-PERK, p-EIF2α, ATF4, and CHOP (Figures 3A–3E), as well as stretch-induced monolayer permeability, confirming that PERK phosphorylation is critical for ISR-mediated permeability changes (Figure 3F). We also observed a decrease in stretch-induced cell death with PI treatment (Figure 3G), but cell death in untreated cells was low (Figure 1L). Taken together, our data provide new evidence that alveolar epithelial barrier function is modulated by PERK activation, and PI treatment can prevent stretch-induced monolayer barrier damage.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

PERK siRNA inhibition decreases stretch-induced epithelial monolayer permeability. (A) AEC-I monolayers were transfected with nontargeting (siRNA/NT) or PERK-specific (siRNA/PERK) siRNA (0.5 μg, 24 h treatment) and subjected to cyclic mechanical stretch (25% surface change for 6 h). Unstretched monolayers served as controls. (B) PERK knockdown resulted in a significant decrease in t-PERK expression. (C) To measure monolayer permeability, cells were cultured on silastic membranes coated with biotinylated fibronectin. After the study, the membranes were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled streptavidin. Under unstretched conditions, the monolayer was impermeable to large molecules, which prevented streptavidin–biotin binding. Stretch resulted in cell–cell contact disruption and subsequent binding of streptavidin to the membrane-bound biotin, which was detected by fluorescent microscopy. PERK inhibition resulted in decreased monolayer permeability. For densitometry data analysis, the Kruskal–Wallis test was performed for multiple-group comparison, and intergroup differences were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For permeability studies, we used one-way ANOVA with post hoc Dunnett’s test, and for multiple conditions two-way ANOVA was performed with Tukey–Kramer post hoc analysis. * represents a significant change between siRNA/NT and siRNA/PERK conditions (B), and NS and S conditions (C); # represents a significant decrease between siRNA/NT and siRNA/PERK S conditions; P < 0.05; n = 4 biological monolayer replicates/condition. siRNA, small interfering RNA.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

PERK phosphorylation inhibition reduces epithelial monolayer dysfunction. AEC-I monolayers were pretreated with 1 μM PERK phosphorylation inhibitor GSK2606414 (PI) or its vehicle (0.01% DMSO) for 18 hours before experimentation to evaluate ISR-induced monolayer damage. (A–D) Levels of p-PERK, p-EIF2α, ATF4, and CHOP were unaffected by PI treatment in unstretched monolayers (NS and NSPI). However, PI treatment (SPI) significantly reduced mechanical stretch (S)-induced ISR activation. Quantified densities are shown in B–E. (F) PI pretreatment significantly reduced monolayer permeability as measured by FITC-labeled streptavidin binding to biotin. (G) We detected decreased stretch-induced cell death in monolayers pretreated with PI. The same statistical tests were performed as described in Figure 2. * represents a significant difference between NS and S or SPI conditions; # represents a significant difference between S and SPI conditions; P < 0.05; n = 6–8 biological monolayer replicates/condition.

The ISR Regulates Epithelial Cytokine Release in an IL-18–Specific Manner

Given the interest in cytokines as a biomarker of injury, we assessed the contribution of ISR signaling to stretch-induced proinflammatory mediator release by measuring the level of 26 common cytokines in the culture media in the presence and absence of PI. We found a generally low cytokine response to stretch, with modest elevations in IL-18, IL-1α, and MIP-1α (Figures 4A–4C). PI treatment decreased IL-18 levels only (Figure 4A). To study the regulation of IL-18 by ISR, we treated stretched and unstretched cells with CHOP, ATF4, and PERK siRNA (Figures 2A, 2B, and 4D–4F). ATF4 siRNA knockdown decreased expression of both ATF4 and CHOP protein, but CHOP siRNA treatment did not affect ATF4 protein levels, confirming that ATF4 is the activator of CHOP signaling in epithelial cells (Figures 4D–4F). IL-18 levels in cell culture media were compared with those observed with no siRNA and nontargeting siRNA treatments. We found that ISR inhibition reduced released IL-18 levels (Figure 4G), but PERK siRNA treatment did not affect Il18 mRNA transcription (Figure E1). Based on these data, we concluded that ISR regulates the posttranscriptional modification of IL-18 in the alveolar epithelium.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

ISR regulates epithelial cytokine levels in an IL-18–specific manner. (A–C) Increased IL-18, IL-1α, and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α) levels were detected in the supernatant of stretch monolayers. PI treatment decreased IL-18 levels but did not affect IL-1α and MIP-1α. (D) We used siRNA to inhibit ISR signaling in stretched (S) and unstretched (NS) monolayers (0.5 μg siRNA, 24 h pretreatment). CHOP inhibition (siRNA/CHOP) decreased CHOP expression but did not affect ATF4. ATF4 inhibition (siRNA/ATF4) resulted in a partial reduction of both CHOP and ATF4. Transfection reagent (VC) and nontargeting siRNA (siRNA/NT) served as controls. Protein expression was normalized to β-actin and quantified by densitometry. Quantified densities are shown in E and F. (G) CHOP, ATF4, and PERK knockdown significantly decreased the IL-18 levels measured in the supernatant of stretched monolayers. Statistics: the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for multiple-group comparison, and intergroup differences were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For cytokine studies, we used n = 8–9 biological monolayer replicates/condition. For siRNA experiments, we used n = 4–5 biological monolayer replicates/condition. In A–C, * represents a significant increase in cytokine levels NS versus S, and # represents a significant decrease between S and SPI conditions. In E and F, * represents a significant increase in protein expression in NS versus S conditions, # represents a significant decrease in ATF4 and CHOP protein expression compared with the siRNA/NT condition in unstretched monolayers, and $ represents a significant decrease in ATF4 and CHOP expression compared with the siRNA/NT condition in stretched monolayers. In G, * represents a significant increase in IL-18 levels in S versus NS conditions, and # represents a significant decrease in IL-18 levels in siRNA/CHOP, siRNA/ATF4, and siRNA/PERK conditions versus siRNA/NT. The significance level was set at P < 0.05 for all experiments.

ISR Activation in VILI

To establish the feasibility of translating our in vitro findings to in vivo, we used a rat model of VILI. Animals were pretreated via oral gavage with either 30 mg/kg PI or its vehicle for 4 hours before the start of the experiment. Rats were ventilated with 20 ml/kg tidal volume via tracheostomy for 4 hours without PEEP or a recruitment maneuver to induce injury. The lung tissue of ventilated animals was compared with that of spontaneously breathing controls. Immunofluorescence analysis of thin-cut sections showed increased EIF2α phosphorylation in response to mechanical ventilation (Figures 5A–5C) in multiple alveolar cell types, including type I alveolar epithelial cells labeled with occludin (Figure 5D). The tissue-homogenate results support our in vitro epithelial stretch findings, showing ISR activation via increased EIF2α phosphorylation and subsequent activation of ATF4 and CHOP after mechanical ventilation (Figures 6A–6D). PI treatment significantly decreased ISR activation in the lung tissue of ventilated animals compared with vehicle-treated ventilated rats (Figures 6A–6D), but PI had no effect on spontaneously breathing animals. These findings suggest that PERK inhibition in vivo can alter ISR signaling.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Injurious mechanical ventilation increases EIF2α phosphorylation in vivo. The fluorescent light emission of Alexa Fluor 488–labeled p-EIF2α antibody was compared between lung tissues obtained from (A) spontaneously breathing and (B) mechanically ventilated (20 ml/kg tidal volume ventilation without positive end-expiratory pressure for 4 h via tracheostomy) rats. EIF2α staining was present in multiple alveolar cell types, including AEC-I cells labeled with occludin. Green, Alexa Fluor 488–labeled p-EIF2α; red, Alexa Fluor 594–labeled occludin; blue, DAPI nuclear stain. Scale bar, 100 μm. Insets show 100 μm enlarged areas. (C) Quantified confocal images showed a significant p-EIF2α increase in ventilated rats compared with spontaneously breathing controls. (D) Enlarged epithelial cells, with arrows pointing at intracellular p-EIF2α staining. Scale bar, 10 μm. Statistics: two-way ANOVA. * represents a significant increase C versus V conditions; P < 0.05; n = 3 biological replicates/condition and 5 images/biological replicates. C, control (spontaneously breathing); V, ventilated (mechanically).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Oral PI treatment reduces ISR activation and improves VILI. (A–D) Rats were treated with 30 mg/kg GSK2606414 compound (PI) or its vehicle (0.1% TWEEN 80 in 0.5% hydroxyethyl-methylcellulose) via oral gavage. Four hours later, the animals were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated (V) as previously described or allowed to breathe spontaneously (C). PI treatment (VPI) significantly reduced VILI-mediated phosphorylation of EIF2α and the protein expression of ATF4 and CHOP but did not affect controls (CPI). (E) VILI increased the BAL total protein content, suggesting increased alveolocapillary permeability and pulmonary edema formation. PI-pretreated animals were protected from a VILI-induced permeability increase. (F) Alveolocapillary barrier dysfunction in VILI was confirmed by FITC-labeled albumin extravasation to the alveoli. VPI animals showed a decreased FITC-labeled albumin permeability index compared with V. (G) A composite lung injury score was calculated for all animals. PI pretreatment mitigated the lung injury score in ventilated animals. (H) VILI significantly increased proinflammatory cytokine IL-18 levels in the BAL. PI-pretreated animals exhibited reduced IL-18 BAL levels. (I) Serum IL-18 levels also increased in the serum of ventilated animals, but PI did not affect the levels. Statistics: the Kruskal–Wallis test was performed for multiple-group comparison, and intergroup differences were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. n = 5–9 animals/condition; * represents a significant increase in V versus C conditions, and # represents a significant decrease in VPI versus V conditions (P < 0.05).

Oral PI Treatment Improves VILI

Acute lung injury is characterized by lung inflammation, pulmonary edema, and proinflammatory cytokine release. To test whether PI treatment in vivo reduces lung injury, we first measured its impact on the BAL cell count. PI treatment significantly reduced VILI-mediated inflammatory cell recruitment to the alveolus, marked by a reduction of the BAL total, macrophage, and neutrophil cell counts to baseline levels compared with ventilated animals that only received vehicle (Table 2). It is important to mention that the PI treatment did not result in immunosuppression in spontaneously breathing animals. In addition, the VILI-induced pulmonary edema formation observed in vehicle-treated rats was significantly reduced in the PI-treated condition, as measured with the surrogate parameter of increased BAL total protein content (Figure 6E). PI pretreatment significantly reduced alveolocapillary permeability in the treatment group compared with vehicle-treated animals (Figure 6E). Our findings were confirmed by the FITC-labeled albumin extravasation index, a more sensitive and specific measurement of membrane integrity (Figure 6F). Lung-tissue–based analysis also showed decreased injury with PI treatment (Figures 6G and E2). To evaluate proinflammatory cytokine release, we measured IL-18 levels. Mechanical ventilation increased IL-18 levels in the BAL (Figure 6H) and serum (Figure 6I). We detected a significant decrease of IL-18 in the BAL, but not the serum, of PI-treated animals. These results show that PI inhibition mitigates VILI. Furthermore, our combined in vivo and in vitro data provide evidence that ISR regulates both alveolar permeability and proinflammatory signaling in the lung.

Table 2.

PERK Inhibition Reduces Inflammation in Lung Injury

Condition Total Cell Count (×103 cells/ml BAL) Macrophage Cell Count (×103 cells/ml BAL) Neutrophil Cell Count (×103 cells/ml BAL)
C 1.32 ± 0.18 0.56 ± 0.04 0.003 ± 0.001
CPI 1.44 ± 0.23 0.77 ± 0.17 0.003 ± 0.003
V 3.01 ± 0.13* 1.69 ± 0.23 0.48 ± 0.06*
VPI 1.75 ± 0.14* 1.28 ± 0.26 0.03 ± 0.009

Definition of abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; C, control, spontaneously breathing animals, pretreated with drug vehicle (0.1% TWEEN 80 in 0.5% hydroxyethyl-methylcellulose) 4 hours before they were killed; CPI, control animals pretreated with 30 mg/kg PERK inhibitor GSK2606414 4 hours before they were killed; PERK, protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; V, vehicle-pretreated rats mechanically ventilated for 4 hours with 20 ml/kg tidal volume without positive end-expiratory pressure and a recruitment maneuver; VPI, mechanically ventilated rats as in condition V, pretreated with 30 mg/kg PI 4 hours before the start of ventilation.

Mechanical ventilation significantly increased the total, macrophage, and neutrophil cell count in the BAL fluid of mechanically ventilated rats. Pretreatment with PERK inhibitor significantly reduced the total BAL macrophage count and neutrophil accumulation in the alveolar space.

P < 0.05; n = 8 animals per condition.

*

represents a significant change in cell count C versus V condition.

represents a significant difference between V and VPI conditions.

Discussion

In this study, we observed increased PERK-mediated ISR signaling in alveolar epithelial cells in response to cyclic stretch and mechanical ventilation. The alveolar epithelium showed an ISR-dependent permeability increase, proinflammatory cytokine production, and cell death. Inhibition of PERK signaling mitigated lung injury signals in vitro and in vivo. This novel observation provides the first evidence that ISR regulates alveolar epithelial homeostasis in response to mechanical stimuli. Our experiments also show that ISR activation is time dependent and may affect cellular function independently of cell death in the alveolar epithelium. In the absence of significant cell death, ISR transcription factor activation follows a bimodal pattern (22). With EIF2α phosphorylation, ATF4 initially responds with increased expression and subsequently upregulates CHOP transcription (23). With continued EIF2α activation, an adaptive transcription factor downregulation occurs to prevent premature cell death (24). In our model, the ISR signal peaks at 6 hours, with an adaptive decrease in ATF4 and CHOP by 12 hours in the presence of persistent EIF2α activation. We observed increased epithelial barrier permeability without significant cell death after 6 hours of stretch exposure. Our laboratory has shown that early epithelial barrier dysfunction is caused by tight-junction protein dissociation (25). It is also known that ISR interacts with Ca2+ signaling (26) and members of the Rho kinase family of small-molecule guanylyl-triphosphates (27), both of which are critical modulators of tight-junction integrity and alveolar epithelial cell permeability in cyclic stretch (28, 29).

The UPR-responsive IRE1α and ATF6 pathways are described in the literature as parallel mechanisms to PERK-mediated ISR. They coregulate protein synthesis in response to cellular stress and have overlapping functions (30). Experiments with PERK-null mice suggest that IRE1α and ATF6 can compensate for the loss of PERK. However, the same mice develop an inflammatory phenotype with severe pancreas insufficiency, bone abnormalities, and premature mortality (31), demonstrating that the three pathways also have independent roles. This paradigm can be explained by the three pathways’ different sensitivities to various forms of endoplasmic reticulum stress (32, 33). In our cell-stretch model, we describe PERK-mediated ISR activation that is independent of the IRE1α pathway. These findings suggest that PERK is a specific sensor of mechanical stretch and that this effect is independent of the UPR. Similarly, Mak and colleagues reported that mouse fibroblasts responded to mechanical force tension with PERK-induced apoptosis without IRE1α or ATF6 signaling (34). Our in vitro findings are strengthened by the striking inhibition of inflammation and alveolocapillary permeability by PI in the rat VILI model. Based on these observations, we conclude that selective PERK inhibition can be used to manipulate cellular responses to stretch and thereby mitigate epithelial injury.

Our comprehensive cytokine profiling resulted in the identification of MIP-1α, IL-1α, and IL-18 as markers of epithelial injury. Only low levels of cytokines are released from the alveolar epithelium in response to a physiological magnitude of cell stretch, and they have not been shown to contribute to alveolar damage (35, 36). However, they may serve as mediators of injury signals. Epithelial-derived MIP-1α is a strong neutrophil chemoattractant that has been shown to induce IL-1 and TNF-α secretion from recruited inflammatory cells (37). IL-1α released from damaged epithelial cells resulted in fibroblast activation in a model of pulmonary fibrosis (38). Recently, Nowarski and colleagues reported that the deletion of IL-18 from colonic epithelial cells caused increased gut permeability and severe colitis (39), and we previously described IL-18 as a critical mediator of lung injury in patients with sepsis and ARDS (40). We further investigated the control of released IL-18 from the epithelium, and found that it is equally regulated by PERK, ATF4, and CHOP after transcription. In macrophages, which are the major source of the cytokine, IL-18 is produced in its pro form by the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor (NLR)-containing inflammasomes and cleaves to its active (mature) form by Caspase (CASP)-1 (41). The NLRP3 inflammasome, which is most studied in response to proinflammatory signals, is sensitive to CHOP activation (42). In lung parenchymal cells, Il18 mRNA is constitutively expressed and RNA levels reflect pro–IL-18 protein levels (43). Recent data suggest that in alveolar epithelial cells, the cleavage of pro–IL-18 to mature IL-18 is independent of NLRP3 inflammasome or CASP-1 (36). In our study, we measured extracellular levels of mature IL-18. Our analysis cannot directly determine whether the observed changes in IL-18 in response to ISR inhibition were the result of decreased cytokine maturation or release, but data from Muñoz and colleagues suggest that secreted IL-18 levels correlate with intracellular expression of the mature cytokine (43). Our data shed light on a new mechanism by which IL-18 is controlled in the epithelium, and, more importantly, strengthen our hypothesis that epithelial cytokine levels are modulated upon stretch response. Although we did not investigate the direct benefit of reduced IL-18 levels for alveolar permeability, our combined in vitro and in vivo data suggest that IL-18 should be investigated further as a marker of alveolar injury.

Our study raises three questions about the cellular and molecular bases of ISR activation in VILI. First, how does PERK sense mechanical stretch? One possible explanation is the interaction of PERK with cell-surface Rho-kinase Rac-1. Our laboratory has shown that cell stretch rapidly and directly activates Rac-1, which in turn modulates epithelial monolayer permeability (28). Second, is ISR activation cell specific in VILI? Our data show increased pEIF2α staining in cell types other than epithelial cells (presumably endothelial cells and macrophages) of mechanically ventilated lung tissue (Figure 5). Stretch data obtained with macrophages and endothelial cells show inducible injury pathways, suggesting that ISR activation takes place in multiple cell types that may contribute to injury signaling (44, 45). Third, and most importantly, what are the biological and clinical implications of ISR inhibition in lung disease? In our hands, one dose of PI was sufficient to inhibit the ISR response without drug-related animal death or severe side effects. Our preliminary measurements confirm steady drug levels of 2 μM in the lung tissue at the end of the 4 hours of mechanical ventilation (data not shown). These data suggest that a short interruption of the ISR system to modify acute lung disease is beneficial.

Our study is subject to limitations. In the absence of reliable mouse alveolar epithelial cell stretch models, we used rat AEC-I cells, which form strong monolayers. Currently there are no genetic-deletion models of ISR in rats; hence, we used siRNA and chemical inhibition in our in vitro studies. This approach is limited by the fact that we achieved only partial blockade of the pathway. Based on our experiments performed with rat AEC-I, we identified PERK as the primary activator of the ISR in response to mechanical stretch. However, as mentioned above, PERK gene–deleted mice have multiple anatomic abnormalities (31), which makes them unsuitable for VILI experiments. As an alternative, in our in vivo rat studies, we used PERK chemical inhibition. PI is an orally available, highly specific inhibitor of PERK that can be used to study the pharmacological action of PERK in vivo, but it remains unclear whether the drug affects other proinjury pathways. Effects on myosin light chain kinase 1 (MLCK1) are of particular concern because of its interaction with tight-junction proteins (46). At a 10 μM concentration (significantly higher than the 2 μM tissue concentrations used in our studies), PI inhibition of MLCK1 is only 15% (47). The low water solubility of PI precludes its intravenous use for ARDS rescue therapy, but its high oral availability makes it attractive to study as a preventative measure for VILI.

Overall, our findings suggest that the ISR pathway is activated in VILI and that selective inhibition of PERK reduces this activation, as evidenced by improved epithelial barrier function and reduced inflammatory signaling (Figure 7). Further studies to understand the role of ISR signaling in the alveolar epithelium will uncover mechanisms of alveolar injury in ARDS. Because oral PERK inhibitors are available due to previous antitumor (48) and antineurodegenerative (18) effects shown in animal models, the development of selective inhibitors of PERK phosphorylation for preclinical testing in VILI and ARDS can be explored as a therapeutic intervention to prevent ARDS.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Hypothetical role of ISR in the molecular pathology of VILI. Mechanical ventilation–induced overstretch of the alveolar epithelium and lung tissue results in PERK autophosphorylation and subsequent phosphorylation of EIF2α. Concomitantly, p-EIF2α activates the transcription factors ATF4 and CHOP downstream, resulting in proinjury signaling. ISR-mediated injury signals induce early epithelial permeability changes, proinflammatory cytokine release, and cell death, all of which contribute to barrier dysfunction and concomitant pulmonary edema formation.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ingrid Lan and Madeline Stolow for technical support, Dr. Jeffrey Axten for providing GSK2606414 (PI) for in vivo experiments, and Dr. Steven Albelda for financially supporting the sequencing at the Wistar Institute.

Footnotes

This work was supported by University of Pennsylvania Internal Funds to S.S.M. and National Institutes of Health grant 5T32HL007586 to T.D.

Author Contributions: Designed the study: S.S.M. and T.D.; conducted experiments: T.D. and G.G.L.; acquired data: T.D., M.S., and G.G.L.; analyzed data: T.D., B.E.H., and M.S.; wrote the manuscript: T.D., B.E.H., and S.S.M.

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue’s table of contents at www.atsjournals.org

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0404OC on March 31, 2017

Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.

References

  • 1.Ware LB, Matthay MA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1334–1349. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, et al. LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315:788–800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301–1308. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Terragni PP, Rosboch G, Tealdi A, Corno E, Menaldo E, Davini O, Gandini G, Herrmann P, Mascia L, Quintel M, et al. Tidal hyperinflation during low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:160–166. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200607-915OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Herold S, Gabrielli NM, Vadász I. Novel concepts of acute lung injury and alveolar-capillary barrier dysfunction. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2013;305:L665–L681. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00232.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Matthay MA, Wiener-Kronish JP. Intact epithelial barrier function is critical for the resolution of alveolar edema in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;142:1250–1257. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/142.6_Pt_1.1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rouschop KM, van den Beucken T, Dubois L, Niessen H, Bussink J, Savelkouls K, Keulers T, Mujcic H, Landuyt W, Voncken JW, et al. The unfolded protein response protects human tumor cells during hypoxia through regulation of the autophagy genes MAP1LC3B and ATG5. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:127–141. doi: 10.1172/JCI40027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Harding HP, Zhang Y, Bertolotti A, Zeng H, Ron D. Perk is essential for translational regulation and cell survival during the unfolded protein response. Mol Cell. 2000;5:897–904. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80330-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Demay Y, Perochon J, Szuplewski S, Mignotte B, Gaumer S. The PERK pathway independently triggers apoptosis and a Rac1/Slpr/JNK/Dilp8 signaling favoring tissue homeostasis in a chronic ER stress Drosophila model. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1452. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhong Q, Zhou B, Ann DK, Minoo P, Liu Y, Banfalvi A, Krishnaveni MS, Dubourd M, Demaio L, Willis BC, et al. Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in epithelial-mesenchymal transition of alveolar epithelial cells: effects of misfolded surfactant protein. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;45:498–509. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2010-0347OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lozon TI, Eastman AJ, Matute-Bello G, Chen P, Hallstrand TS, Altemeier WA. PKR-dependent CHOP induction limits hyperoxia-induced lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2011;300:L422–L429. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00166.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tschumperlin DJ, Margulies SS. Equibiaxial deformation-induced injury of alveolar epithelial cells in vitro. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:L1173–L1183. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1998.275.6.L1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Borok Z, Lubman RL, Danto SI, Zhang XL, Zabski SM, King LS, Lee DM, Agre P, Crandall ED. Keratinocyte growth factor modulates alveolar epithelial cell phenotype in vitro: expression of aquaporin 5. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998;18:554–561. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.18.4.2838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lu Q, Jankowich M, Newton J, Harrington EO, Rounds S. Alterations in molecular chaperones and eIF2alpha during lung endothelial cell apoptosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2010;298:L501–L508. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00416.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Korfei M, Ruppert C, Mahavadi P, Henneke I, Markart P, Koch M, Lang G, Fink L, Bohle RM, Seeger W, et al. Epithelial endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in sporadic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:838–846. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200802-313OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim S, Joe Y, Kim HJ, Kim YS, Jeong SO, Pae HO, Ryter SW, Surh YJ, Chung HT. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced IRE1α activation mediates cross-talk of GSK-3β and XBP-1 to regulate inflammatory cytokine production. J Immunol. 2015;194:4498–4506. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van ’t Wout EF, Hiemstra PS, Marciniak SJ. The integrated stress response in lung disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014;50:1005–1009. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0019TR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yerrapureddy A, Tobias J, Margulies SS. Cyclic stretch magnitude and duration affect rat alveolar epithelial gene expression. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2010;25:113–122. doi: 10.1159/000272056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dolinay T, Wu W, Kaminski N, Ifedigbo E, Kaynar AM, Szilasi M, Watkins SC, Ryter SW, Hoetzel A, Choi AM. Mitogen-activated protein kinases regulate susceptibility to ventilator-induced lung injury. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dombroski BA, Nayak RR, Ewens KG, Ankener W, Cheung VG, Spielman RS. Gene expression and genetic variation in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress in human cells. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:719–729. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ye P, Mimura J, Okada T, Sato H, Liu T, Maruyama A, Ohyama C, Itoh K. Nrf2- and ATF4-dependent upregulation of xCT modulates the sensitivity of T24 bladder carcinoma cells to proteasome inhibition. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34:3421–3434. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00221-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Walter P, Ron D. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science. 2011;334:1081–1086. doi: 10.1126/science.1209038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rutkowski DT, Arnold SM, Miller CN, Wu J, Li J, Gunnison KM, Mori K, Sadighi Akha AA, Raden D, Kaufman RJ. Adaptation to ER stress is mediated by differential stabilities of pro-survival and pro-apoptotic mRNAs and proteins. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cavanaugh KJ, Jr, Oswari J, Margulies SS. Role of stretch on tight junction structure in alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001;25:584–591. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.25.5.4486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Krebs J, Agellon LB, Michalak M. Ca(2+) homeostasis and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress: an integrated view of calcium signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;460:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen R, Rato C, Yan Y, Crespillo-Casado A, Clarke HJ, Harding HP, Marciniak SJ, Read RJ, Ron D. G-actin provides substrate-specificity to eukaryotic initiation factor 2α holophosphatases. eLife. 2015;4:e04871. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dipaolo BC, Davidovich N, Kazanietz MG, Margulies SS. Rac1 pathway mediates stretch response in pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2013;305:L141–L153. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00298.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Michalick L, Erfinanda L, Weichelt U, van der Giet M, Liedtke W, Kuebler WM. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 and serum glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 are critical mediators of lung injury in overventilated mice in vivo. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:300–311. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hetz C. The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:89–102. doi: 10.1038/nrm3270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang P, McGrath B, Li S, Frank A, Zambito F, Reinert J, Gannon M, Ma K, McNaughton K, Cavener DR. The PERK eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha kinase is required for the development of the skeletal system, postnatal growth, and the function and viability of the pancreas. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:3864–3874. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.11.3864-3874.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.DuRose JB, Tam AB, Niwa M. Intrinsic capacities of molecular sensors of the unfolded protein response to sense alternate forms of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:3095–3107. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-01-0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sharma RB, O’Donnell AC, Stamateris RE, Ha B, McCloskey KM, Reynolds PR, Arvan P, Alonso LC. Insulin demand regulates β cell number via the unfolded protein response. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3831–3846. doi: 10.1172/JCI79264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mak BC, Wang Q, Laschinger C, Lee W, Ron D, Harding HP, Kaufman RJ, Scheuner D, Austin RC, McCulloch CA. Novel function of PERK as a mediator of force-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:23462–23472. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803194200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dixon DL, Barr HA, Bersten AD, Doyle IR. Intracellular storage of surfactant and proinflammatory cytokines in co-cultured alveolar epithelium and macrophages in response to increasing CO2 and cyclic cell stretch. Exp Lung Res. 2008;34:37–47. doi: 10.1080/01902140701807928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kostadinova E, Chaput C, Gutbier B, Lippmann J, Sander LE, Mitchell TJ, Suttorp N, Witzenrath M, Opitz B. NLRP3 protects alveolar barrier integrity by an inflammasome-independent increase of epithelial cell adherence. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30943. doi: 10.1038/srep30943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Herold S, von Wulffen W, Steinmueller M, Pleschka S, Kuziel WA, Mack M, Srivastava M, Seeger W, Maus UA, Lohmeyer J. Alveolar epithelial cells direct monocyte transepithelial migration upon influenza virus infection: impact of chemokines and adhesion molecules. J Immunol. 2006;177:1817–1824. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.3.1817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Suwara MI, Green NJ, Borthwick LA, Mann J, Mayer-Barber KD, Barron L, Corris PA, Farrow SN, Wynn TA, Fisher AJ, et al. IL-1α released from damaged epithelial cells is sufficient and essential to trigger inflammatory responses in human lung fibroblasts. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7:684–693. doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nowarski R, Jackson R, Gagliani N, de Zoete MR, Palm NW, Bailis W, Low JS, Harman CC, Graham M, Elinav E, et al. Epithelial IL-18 equilibrium controls barrier function in colitis. Cell. 2015;163:1444–1456. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dolinay T, Kim YS, Howrylak J, Hunninghake GM, An CH, Fredenburgh L, Massaro AF, Rogers A, Gazourian L, Nakahira K, et al. Inflammasome-regulated cytokines are critical mediators of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:1225–1234. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201201-0003OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Netea MG, van de Veerdonk FL, van der Meer JW, Dinarello CA, Joosten LA. Inflammasome-independent regulation of IL-1-family cytokines. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:49–77. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lebeaupin C, Proics E, de Bieville CH, Rousseau D, Bonnafous S, Patouraux S, Adam G, Lavallard VJ, Rovere C, Le Thuc O, et al. ER stress induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation and hepatocyte death. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1879. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Muñoz M, Eidenschenk C, Ota N, Wong K, Lohmann U, Kühl AA, Wang X, Manzanillo P, Li Y, Rutz S, et al. Interleukin-22 induces interleukin-18 expression from epithelial cells during intestinal infection. Immunity. 2015;42:321–331. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wu J, Yan Z, Schwartz DE, Yu J, Malik AB, Hu G. Activation of NLRP3 inflammasome in alveolar macrophages contributes to mechanical stretch-induced lung inflammation and injury. J Immunol. 2013;190:3590–3599. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Birukov KG, Jacobson JR, Flores AA, Ye SQ, Birukova AA, Verin AD, Garcia JG. Magnitude-dependent regulation of pulmonary endothelial cell barrier function by cyclic stretch. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2003;285:L785–L797. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00336.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cunningham KE, Turner JR. Myosin light chain kinase: pulling the strings of epithelial tight junction function. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1258:34–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06526.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Axten JM, Medina JR, Feng Y, Shu A, Romeril SP, Grant SW, Li WH, Heerding DA, Minthorn E, Mencken T, et al. Discovery of 7-methyl-5-(1-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]acetyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-indol-5-yl)-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-amine (GSK2606414), a potent and selective first-in-class inhibitor of protein kinase R (PKR)-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) J Med Chem. 2012;55:7193–7207. doi: 10.1021/jm300713s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Atkins C, Liu Q, Minthorn E, Zhang SY, Figueroa DJ, Moss K, Stanley TB, Sanders B, Goetz A, Gaul N, et al. Characterization of a novel PERK kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic activity. Cancer Res. 2013;73:1993–2002. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES