Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Medical Microbiology
. 2017 Jul 12;66(7):898–904. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000512

Effect of involved Aspergillus species on galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with invasive aspergillosis

Mojtaba Taghizadeh-Armaki 1,2,3, Mohammad T Hedayati 1,2,*, Vahid Moqarabzadeh 4, Saham Ansari 5, Saeed Mahdavi Omran 3, Hossein Zarrinfar 6, Sasan Saber 7, Paul E Verweij 8, David W Denning 9, Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi 1,8,
PMCID: PMC5737110  PMID: 28693685

Abstract

Purpose

The detection of galactomannan (GM) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid is an important surrogate marker for the early diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of invasive aspergillosis (IA), regardless of the involved species of Aspergillus. Here, we utilized the Platelia Aspergillus GM enzyme immunoassay (Bio-Rad) to evaluate the GM index in BAL fluid samples from patients with proven, probable or putative IA due to Aspergillusflavus versus Aspergillusfumigatus.

Methodology

In a prospective study between 2009 and 2015, 116 BAL samples were collected from suspected IA patients referred to two university hospitals in Tehran, Iran.

Key findings

According to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Mycoses Study Group and Blot criteria, 35 patients were classified as IA patients, of which 33 cases tested positive for GM above 0.5 and, among these patients, 22 had a GM index ≥1. Twenty-eight were culture positive for A. flavus and seven for A. fumigatus. The GM index for A. flavus cases was between 0.5–6.5 and those of A. fumigatus ranged from 1 to 6.5. The sensitivity and specificity of a GM index ≥0.5 in cases with A. flavus were 86 and 88 % and for A. fumigatus patients were 100 and 73 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Overall, the mean GM index in patients with A. fumigatus (3.1) was significantly higher than those of A. flavus (1.6; P-value=0.031) and the sensitivity of GM lower for A. flavus when compared to A. fumigatus. This finding has implications for diagnosis in hospitals and countries with a high proportion of A. flavus infections.

Keywords: Bronchoalveolar lavage, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus

Abbreviations

AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; EORTC/MSG, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Mycoses Study Group; GM, galactomannan; IA, invasive aspergillosis; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; ROC, receiver operating characteristics curve.

Introduction

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is one of the most significant and challenging invasive fungal infections, and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients [1, 2]. This disease occurs mainly in patients with a markedly impaired immune system. After A. fumigatus, A. flavus is the second leading cause of invasive and non-invasive aspergillosis [3, 4]. In many tropical and sub-tropical countries, including India, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iraq, Turkey and Iran, A. flavus has most frequently been reported as the predominant etiological agent causing mainly cerebral or sino-orbital aspergillosis, or ocular infections [5, 6]. Early diagnosis of IA remains a challenge, but it is important for better therapeutic outcomes [7]. Galactomannan (GM) antigen, a polysaccharide secreted from the Aspergillus spp., correlates with the growth phase of the fungus [8–11]. Aspergillus GM antigen detection in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid by the Bio-Rad Platelia sandwich enzyme immunoassay (EIA, Bio-Rad) has been studied extensively [12, 13]. Several previous studies have also evaluated the GM assay in BAL samples in various patient groups and conditions; they reported a higher parallel sensitivity and specificity in comparison to serum specimens [14–16]. According to the revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) diagnostic criteria, a positive BAL GM test is a mycological criterion of IA in association with host and clinical or radiological findings [17]. The GM assay has gained widespread acceptance as a sensitive method for the early diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of IA by applying it directly to specimens from the target organ [18, 19]. In the present study, we evaluated the GM index in BAL samples from patients with proven, probable or putative IA due to A. flavus versus A. fumigatus using Platelia Aspergillus EIA.

Methods

Patient

In a prospective study, 116 BAL fluid samples were collected from patients with pulmonary disorders who were referred to the bronchoscopy section of the Shariyati and Imam-Khomeini Hospitals, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, from June 2009 to October 2015. Written informed consent was taken from all participants. We included all data on suspected patients of IA (host factors, clinical features and mycological data) as defined by EORTC/MSG [17]. In addition, we used the clinical algorithm suggested by Blot et al. [20], which includes the endotracheal aspirate culture to demonstrate proven or putative IA in the existence of matchable symptoms, unusual thoracic medical imaging and either host factors or BAL fluid positive for Aspergillus on direct examination and culture.

BAL sampling

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (Olympus BF20D) with BAL was performed if feasible. The sampling area was selected based on the infiltrate location on the chest radiograph. Then, 50 ml sterile normal saline was injected through the device. The suction channel of the bronchoscope was used to aspirate 25–30 ml fluid, yielding clinical samples, which were collected into sterile tubes and immediately transferred to the Medical Mycology Laboratory at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences.

Processing of BAL fluid specimens

All BAL samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 r.p.m. and then the supernatants were stored at −80 °C. The remaining sediment was used for direct microscopic examination and culture. The smear from each sample was mounted with 20 % potassium hydroxide (KOH) and Calcofluor White to detect the hyphal elements. Sabouraud dextrose agar supplemented with chloramphenicol (40 µg ml−1) was used for the isolation of fungi. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 5 days. Aspergillus species were identified by morphological characteristics and molecular sequencing of beta tubulin [21].

GM Platelia Aspergillus assay

The Platelia Aspergillus GM EIA (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) was used to detect GM on centrifuged BAL fluid specimens, according to the manufacturer's manual, using 300 µl of the BAL sample. Positive and negative control ELISA kits were included in each test. The results were recorded as GM indexes ≥0.5 and ≥1.

Data analysis

The mean age, standard deviation, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and interactive dot diagram were calculated for each value using MedCalc software version 14.8. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were computed by an online website (http://araw.mede.uic.edu/cgi-bin/testcalc.pl). The t-test was applied to compare the GM index of A. flavus and A. fumigatus among positive IA patients. The estimated prevalence of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) was determined by the following formula: (proven IPA+probable IPA)/(proven IPA+probable IPA+patients without IPA).

Results

The mean age of the 116 studied patients was 46±15.4 ranging from 12 to 78 years. Seventy-three (62.9 %) patients were male. Table 1 shows clinical characteristics of all studied patients in the current study. Of the 116 BAL samples, 26/116 (22.4 %) and 38/116 (32.7 %) were positive by direct microscopy and culture, respectively. Out of 116 patients, 35 cases were classified as IA. According to EORTC/MSG criteria [17], two cases were classified as proven IA and 16 cases as probable IA. In addition, using the clinical algorithm suggested by Blot et al. [20], 17 cases were categorized as putative IA (Table S1, available with the online Supplementary Material). Three cases were also defined as possible IA based on the underlying host factor and radiological features, however these cases were excluded from the final analysis since mycological criteria were lacking.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the 116 patients studied.

Characteristics All patients Patients with IA Patients without IA
No. of patients 116 35 81
Men/women 73/43 23/12 50/31
Age, mean±sd, year 46±15.4 44.7±16.2 46.6±15.2
IA classification No. of patient EORTC/MSG criteria Blot et al. criteria Non-IA
Underlying disease No. of proven IA No. of probable IA No. of putative IA No. of non-IA
Haematological malignancies 29 0 10 0 19
COPD 16 0 0 5 11
Lung cancer 10 0 5 1 4
Pulmonary and respiratory disorders 21 0 1 2 18
Organ transplantation 16 2 0 0 14
Autoimmune diseases 3 0 0 2 1
Renal failure 4 0 0 2 2
Tuberculosis with cavity 3 0 0 3 0
Breast cancer 2 0 0 1 1
ICU patients 6 0 0 0 6
CGD 2 0 0 1 1
Diabetes mellitus 4 0 0 0 4
Total cases 116 2 16 17 81

IA, invasive aspergillosis; No., number; sd, standard deviation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ICU, intensive care unit; CGD, chronic granulomatous disease.

Using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-sequencing targeting the beta-tubulin region of rDNA, A. flavus (28, 80 %) and A. fumigatus (7, 20 %) were identified. Out of 35 patients with IA, 10 (28.6 %) had underlying haematologic malignancy. Seventeen patients had evidence of invasive airway infection with nodules, ulceration, pseudomembrane and mass obstruction of the airway; therefore invasive Aspergillus tracheobronchitis is an alternative or additional disease classification to IPA for these patients. There were three patients with cavities and prior tuberculosis or a lung injury from chemical warfare who may be better classified as having chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA), but Aspergillus IgG detection was not done to confirm the diagnosis. Five patients with lung cancer probably had IA, although this is not one of the host groups in the EORTC/MSG criteria. Likewise, there were five patients with COPD, two of whom had Aspergillus tracheobronchitis, in whom the precise and complete Aspergillus diagnosis was unclear.

At a GM index ≥0.5, of 116 patients, 33 (28.4 %) with IPA and five (4.3 %) cases without IPA had positive results. However, at a GM index ≥1, of these studied patients, 22 (19.0 %) cases had positive results. Ten patients with IA had a GM index ≥2, including two cases with proven IA. In IA patients with positive GM, the GM index ranged from 0.5 to 6.5. In positive GM cases with a positive BAL fluid culture, the mean GM index (1.9) was higher than those with negative cases with a negative culture (0.34). The mean of the GM index in IA patients with A. fumigatus (3.1) was significantly higher than those of A. flavus (1.6; P=0.031).

Table 2 shows the sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values of GM detection in all BAL samples for GM indexes ≥0.5 and ≥1. The sensitivity and specificity of a GM index ≥0.5 in cases with A. flavus were 86 and 88 % and for A. fumigatus patients were 100 and 73 %, respectively.

Table 2. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for two cut-off GM indexes ≥0.5 and ≥1 for 116 collected BAL samples.

Criteria GM index Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV 95 % CI AUC value Cost value* P-value
A. flavus ≥0.5 86 88 52 97 91.0–99.5 0.89 0.137 P<0.05
≥1 57 89 47 92 94.2–96.3 0.82 0.157 P<0.05
A. fumigatus ≥0.5 100 73 40 100 95.1–100 0.94 0.226 P<0.05
≥1 86 88 56 97 91–99.5 0.92 0.123 P<0.05
Total ≥0.5 91 82 47 98 92.1–99.8 0.91 0.166 P<0.05
≥1 57 86 44 92 94.5–96.6 0.86 0.172 P<0.05

PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval; AUC, area under the ROC curve.

*The average cost resulting from the use of the diagnostic test at that decision level. Note that the cost reported here excludes the ‘overhead cost’, i.e. the cost of doing the test, which is constant at all decision levels.

The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for a GM index ≥0.5 in all BAL samples was 0.91 (95 % CI, 92.1–99.8, P<0.0001) while at a GM index ≥1 it was 0.86 (95 % CI, 94.5–96.6, P<0.0001). On the other hand, the AUC using the standard cut-off GM index ≥0.5 for A. flavus culture-positive BAL samples was 0.89 (95 % CI, 91.0–99.5, P<0.0001) and for A. fumigatus it was 0.94 (95 % CI, 95.1–100, P<0.0001).

Fig. 1 shows the GM index based on culture results in four different groups of patients, including all culture-negative BAL samples, A. flavus culture-positive BAL samples, A. fumigatus culture-positive BAL samples and other Aspergillus species culture-positive BAL samples.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Log10 transformation of GM index based on BAL fluid culture results in all patients. (a) Culture-negative BAL samples. (b) A. flavus culture-positive BAL samples. (c) A. fumigatus culture-positive BAL samples. (d) Other Aspergillus species culture-positive BAL samples.

According to our results on the prevalence of IA, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated as 15 and 0.06, respectively (Fig. S1). The value cost of 0.166 at a GM index ≥0.5 was the best cut-off point for diagnosis of IA, while this value at a GM index ≥1 was 0.172.

Discussion

In clinical practice, GM index evaluation in BAL has been encouraged as a suitable assessment for early diagnosis of IA in patients with various underlying disorders [22–25].

Several studies reported the value of GM antigen detection in BAL fluid as a promising tool for diagnosis of IA due to A. fumigatus [26–29]. Two GM indexes ≥0.5 [16, 30, 31] and ≥1.0 [7, 28, 32] for BAL fluid have been proposed for the assessment of GM in diagnosis of IA due to A. fumigatus; however, to the best of our knowledge, data on A. flavus is scarce.

In the present study, we therefore compared the Platelia GM index in BAL fluid from patients with proven, probable or putative pulmonary aspergillosis due to A. flavus versus A. fumigatus. Importantly, we found an increased index of GM in seven cases with A. fumigatus with critical host factors in comparison to patients with A. flavus. A GM index of ≥0.5 has shown reliable sensitivity and specificity for all tests. On the other hand, applying a GM index ≥1, 11 cases with positive A. flavus in BAL fluid culture had negative GM test results. Therefore, it seems that a GM index ≥0.5 would be an appropriate option for early diagnosis of IA, especially due to A. flavus and subsequently to proceed the rapid antifungal therapy in patients at high risk for IA. The ROC curve analysis indicated AUC values of 0.91 (95 % CI, 92.1–99.8) for GM testing using a cut-off ≥0.5, which is in agreement with the previous report by He et al. [33] who reported a similar ROC value for the GM index in BAL fluid (AUC=0.91; 95 % CI).

In the current study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the GM index considering a cut-off value of ≥0.5 were 91 and 82 %, respectively. The sensitivity results were in line with previous reports of Maertens et al. [7], D’Haese et al. [28] and Luaong et al. [34], and specificity was similar to the findings of Maertens et al. [7], Desai et al. [35] and Clancy et al. [36].

However, in contrast to our results, [32], Luong et al. [37] and Reinwald et al. [38] reported sensitivities of 100, 100, 67 % and specificities of 73, 78, 96 %, respectively [32, 37, 38]. In our study, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 57 and 86 % for a GM index of ≥1.0, respectively, which is somewhat different from the previous studies by Husain et al. [39], Musher et al. [40] and Khodavaysi et al. [41]. These differences might be due to different underlying conditions of the IA patients tested, various sizes of investigated populations, antifungal treatment, the different guidelines or diagnostic criteria for definition of proven or probable IA, the applied GM index as the diagnostic criteria and the species of Aspergillus involved in IA.

Notably, we also found that five of the non-IA patients who were receiving beta-lactam antibiotics, had a GM index ≥0.5, which is comparable with the Meersseman et al. [42] study which reported four of 33 intensive care unit patients with a false-positive GM index in BAL samples. The mechanism of beta-lactam giving a false positive BAL GM test has not been well determined, however certain domains of the β-lactam drugs show cross-reactivity to Aspergillus GM molecules at different concentrations. The interfering molecules in serum probably diffuse into the epithelial lining fluid to exceed the cut-off threshold, leading to a false positive BAL GM test [43, 44].

In our study, the high frequency of positive GM tests in IA patients due to A. flavus is similar to results from Tunisia [45] and India [46]. However, the GM result in BAL fluid for A. flavus in our study (28/116, 24.1 %) is not comparable to the results from The Netherlands (3.44 %) [47], Italy (4.5 %) [48], USA (0.8 and 1.2 %) [36, 39], Belgium (2.3 %) [7], France (2 %) [49], UK (0.6 %) [50], China (4 %) [33], Japan (0.6 %) [22], Czech and Slovak Republics (4.2 %) [51], Turkey (3.3 %) [52] and India (11.6 %) [46]. To the best of our knowledge, none of the previous studies reported a twofold mean of the GM index in IA patients with A. fumigatus in comparison to IA patients with A. flavus. Xavier et al. [53] in an in vitro study found that the quantity of scattered GM varies according to the species of Aspergillus. They demonstrated that among different species of Aspergillus, Aspergillus terreus has the maximum GM index, closely followed by A. fumigatus in comparison to Aspergillus niger and A. flavus [53]. Another study showed a higher secretion of GM by A. niger and A. flavus in comparison to A. fumigatus [54]. In general, the reasons for differences in GM indexes between different strains of Aspergillus are not yet well known. However, the higher amount of in vivo GM released by A. fumigatus strains, in comparison to A. flavus, may be due to a higher germination rate (logarithmic phase) at 37 °C by A. fumigatus. On the other hand, the high β-d-galactofuranosidase produced by A. fumigatus might respond more avidly in the GM assay than A. flavus [55]. Further study is needed to clarify the reason for the differences in GM indexes in IA patients with different species of Aspergillus.

Although A. fumigatus is reported as the most prevalent etiologic agent of IA and CPA compared with other Aspergillus species [56, 57], in the present study A. flavus was the most common isolated species among Aspergillus spp. In Table 3 we also summarized the reported etiologic agents of IA in different countries and highlighted the GM index and mycological criteria used. Of note, A. flavus has been frequently reported as the leading cause of invasive aspergillosis in certain tropical and sub-tropical countries [58]. A limitation of the current study is that we did not study invasive rhinosinusitis, which is more often caused by A. flavus than other species.

Table 3. Summarized data on IA in different underlying patients due to A. flavus and A. fumigatus in different studies from 2003 to 2017.

Country Host factors Total number of patients No. positive A. flavus/ A. fumigatus Kit used (laboratory) Cut-off Gm index value Sn (%) Estimated prevalence IA (%) Reference
The Netherlands Haematological malignancies 29 1/42 Sanofi 1.0 100 28 [47]
Italy Haematology patients 44 2/4 Bio-Rad nd nd 45 [48]
USA Solid-organ transplant recipients 81 1/4 Bio-Rad 1 100 6.2 [36]
USA Solid organ transplants 116 1/3 Bio-Rad 0.5 67 5 [39]
India Bronchogenic carcinoma 69 8/10 Bio-Rad 1 100 41 [46]
Belgium Haematological malignancies 128 3/23 Bio-Rad ns 97 45 [7]
France Haematologic malignancies 101 2/9 Bio-Rad 0.5 57.6 33 [49]
Italy High-risk patients (haematology and intensive care unit) 158 1/6 Bio-Rad 1 94.1 11 [50]
China Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 50 2/6 Sanofi 0.5 88.9 18 [33]
Japan Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis 144 1/11 nd 0.4 77.2 12.5 [22]
Czech and Slovak Haematological malignancies 176 1/19 nd 0.5 nd 6.8 [51]
Turkey Neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients 839 28/80 Bio-Rad 1 nd nd [52]
Iran Patients with various underlying disorders 116 28/7 BioRad 0.5 91 30 Present study

nd, not-determined; ns, not-specified; Sn, sensitivity.

Overall, our findings emphasized that a GM index ≥0.5 is the best cut-off value for screening patients suspected of IA. On the other hand, we observed that using a GM index ≥0.5 in patients with positive BAL fluid culture with A. flavus can help to avoid missing IA cases. In a patient group selected for a high likelihood of IPA, the sensitivity of GM was lower for A. flavus compared with A. fumigatus, which has implications for diagnosis in hospitals and countries with a high proportion of A. flavus infections.

Funding information

This study was supported by a research fund (No. 92–180) from the Invasive Fungi Research Center of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Acknowledgements

The participating patients are thanked for their kind cooperation, which was essential for the completion of the study.

Conflicts of interest

P. E. V. has served as a consultant to and has received research grants from Astellas, Basilea, Gilead Sciences, Merck and Pfizer. S. S. has received a research grant from Astellas Pharma B.V. D. W. D. is President of the Global Action Fund for Fungal Infections (www.GAFFI.org) which aims to improve the outcome of patients with serious fungal infections across the world, including Invasive aspergillosis. All other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical statement

The Ethics Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (code: 1392/12/14) approved this research and written informed consent was obtained from the patients or next of kin.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary File 1

References

  • 1.Savio J, Menon NR, Sudharma AR, Jairaj V, Mathew J. Galactomannan assay and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis – comparison of the test performance at an in-house and the kit cut-off. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:1–4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19175.8310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mokaddas E, Burhamah MH, Ahmad S, Khan ZU. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis due to Aspergillus terreus: value of DNA, galactomannan and (1→ 3)-β-D-glucan detection in serum samples as an adjunct to diagnosis. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59:1519–1523. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.023630-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guinea J, Torres-Narbona M, Gijón P, Muñoz P, Pozo F, et al. Pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:870–877. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03015.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kousha M, Tadi R, Soubani AO. Pulmonary aspergillosis: a clinical review. Eur Respir Rev. 2011;20:156–174. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00001011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hedayati MT, Bahoosh M, Kasiri A, Ghasemi M, Motahhari SJ, et al. Prevalence of fungal rhinosinusitis among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis from Iran. J Mycol Med. 2010;20:298–303. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2010.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chakrabarti A, Chatterjee SS, Das A, Shivaprakash MR. Invasive aspergillosis in developing countries. Med Mycol. 2011;49:S35–S47. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.505206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maertens J, Maertens V, Theunissen K, Meersseman W, Meersseman P, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid galactomannan for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with hematologic diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1688–1693. doi: 10.1086/647935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pfeiffer CD, Fine JP, Safdar N. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis using a galactomannan assay: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1417–1727. doi: 10.1086/503427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rex JH. Galactomannan and the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1428–1430. doi: 10.1086/503432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hage CA, Knox KS, Davis TE, Wheat LJ. Antigen detection in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of fungal pneumonia. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011;17:167–171. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3283447b60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dupont D, Picot S, Rimmele T, Boibieux A, Geffriaud T, et al. Galactomannan antigen and Aspergillus antibody responses in a transplant recipient with multiple invasive fungal infections. JMM Case Rep. 2015;2:1–5. doi: 10.1099/jmmcr.0.000026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Morton CO, Loeffler J, de Luca A, Frost S, Kenny C, et al. Dynamics of extracellular release of Aspergillus fumigatus DNA and galactomannan during growth in blood and serum. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59:408–413. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.017418-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Springer J, Morton CO, Perry M, Heinz WJ, Paholcsek M, et al. Multicenter comparison of serum and whole-blood specimens for detection of Aspergillus DNA in high-risk hematological patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:1445–1450. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03322-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tabarsi P, Soraghi A, Marjani M, Zandian P, Baghaei P, et al. Comparison of serum and bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in diagnosing invasive aspergillosis in solid-organ transplant recipients. Exp Clin Transplant. 2012;10:278–281. doi: 10.6002/ect.2011.0176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mohammadi S, Khalilzadeh S, Goudarzipour K, Hassanzad M, Mahdaviani A, et al. Bronchoalveolar galactomannan in invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: a prospective study in pediatric patients. Med Mycol. 2015;53:709–716. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Boch T, Buchheidt D, Spiess B, Miethke T, Hofmann WK, et al. Direct comparison of galactomannan performance in concurrent serum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples in immunocompromised patients at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2016;59:80–85. doi: 10.1111/myc.12434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1813–1821. doi: 10.1086/588660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Duarte RF, Sánchez-Ortega I, Cuesta I, Arnan M, Patiño B, et al. Serum galactomannan-based early detection of invasive aspergillosis in hematology patients receiving effective antimold prophylaxis. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:1696–1702. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hoenigl M, Prattes J, Spiess B, Wagner J, Prueller F, et al. Performance of galactomannan, beta-d-glucan, Aspergillus lateral-flow device, conventional culture, and PCR tests with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:2039–2045. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00467-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Blot SI, Taccone FS, Van den Abeele AM, Bulpa P, Meersseman W, et al. A clinical algorithm to diagnose invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:56–64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201111-1978OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Alcazar-Fuoli L, Mellado E, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL. Aspergillus section Fumigati: antifungal susceptibility patterns and sequence-based identification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1244–1251. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00942-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Izumikawa K, Yamamoto Y, Mihara T, Takazono T, Morinaga Y, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan for the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Med Mycol. 2012;50:811–817. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2012.682228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brownback KR, Thomas LA, Simpson SQ. Role of bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates in immunocompromised patients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014;27:322–328. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Prattes J, Flick H, Prüller F, Koidl C, Raggam RB, et al. Novel tests for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in patients with underlying respiratory diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:922–929. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201407-1275OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kim SW, Rhee CK, Kang HS, Lee HY, Kang JY, et al. Diagnostic value of bronchoscopy in patients with hematologic malignancy and pulmonary infiltrates. Ann Hematol. 2015;94:153–159. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2172-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nguyen MH, Jaber R, Leather HL, Wingard JR, Staley B, et al. Use of bronchoalveolar lavage to detect galactomannan for diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis among nonimmunocompromised hosts. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2787–2792. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00716-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guo YL, Chen YQ, Wang K, Qin SM, Wu C, et al. Accuracy of BAL galactomannan in diagnosing invasive aspergillosis: a bivariate metaanalysis and systematic review. Chest. 2010;138:817–824. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.D'Haese J, Theunissen K, Vermeulen E, Schoemans H, de Vlieger G, et al. Detection of galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples of patients at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: analytical and clinical validity. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:1258–1263. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06423-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Barton RC. Laboratory diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: from diagnosis to prediction of outcome. Scientifica. 2013;2013:1–29. doi: 10.1155/2013/459405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lahmer T, Neuenhahn M, Held J, Rasch S, Schmid RM, et al. Comparison of 1,3-β-d-glucan with galactomannan in serum and bronchoalveolar fluid for the detection of Aspergillus species in immunosuppressed mechanical ventilated critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2016;36:259–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang S, Wang S, Wan Z, Que C, Li R, et al. Quantitative real-time PCR and Platelia galactomannan assay for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid performs better than serum in non-neutropaenic patients. Mycopathologia. 2016;181:625–629. doi: 10.1007/s11046-016-0024-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hsu LY, Ding Y, Phua J, Koh LP, Chan DS, et al. Galactomannan testing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is useful for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in hematology patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:1–6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.He H, Ding L, Sun B, Li F, Zhan Q. Role of galactomannan determinations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: a prospective study. Crit Care. 2012;16:R138–8. doi: 10.1186/cc11443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Luong ML, Clancy CJ, Vadnerkar A, Kwak EJ, Silveira FP, et al. Comparison of an Aspergillus real-time polymerase chain reaction assay with galactomannan testing of bronchoalvelolar lavage fluid for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:1218–1226. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Desai R, Ross LA, Hoffman JA. The role of bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in the diagnosis of pediatric invasive aspergillosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:283–286. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31818f0934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Clancy CJ, Jaber RA, Leather HL, Wingard JR, Staley B, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis among solid-organ transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1759–1765. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00077-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Luong ML, Filion C, Labbé AC, Roy J, Pépin J, et al. Clinical utility and prognostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in patients with hematologic malignancies. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;68:132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reinwald M, Spiess B, Heinz WJ, Vehreschild JJ, Lass-Flörl C, et al. Diagnosing pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with hematological malignancies: a multicenter prospective evaluation of an Aspergillus PCR assay and a galactomannan ELISA in bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Eur J Haematol. 2012;89:120–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2012.01806.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Husain S, Paterson DL, Studer SM, Crespo M, Pilewski J, et al. Aspergillus galactomannan antigen in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2007;83:1330–1336. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000263992.41003.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Musher B, Fredricks D, Leisenring W, Balajee SA, Smith C, et al. Aspergillus galactomannan enzyme immunoassay and quantitative PCR for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5517–5522. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5517-5522.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Khodavaysi S, Hedayati MT, Alialy M, Habibi MR, Badali H. Detection of galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage of the intensive care unit patients at risk for invasive aspergillosis. Curr Med Mycol. 2015;1:12–17. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.cmm.1.1.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Meersseman W, Lagrou K, Maertens J, Wilmer A, Hermans G, et al. Galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: a tool for diagnosing aspergillosis in intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:27–34. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200704-606OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bart-Delabesse E, Basile M, Al Jijakli A, Souville D, Gay F, et al. Detection of Aspergillus galactomannan antigenemia to determine biological and clinical implications of beta-lactam treatments. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5214–5220. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5214-5220.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Boonsarngsuk V, Niyompattama A, Teosirimongkol C, Sriwanichrak K. False-positive serum and bronchoalveolar lavage Aspergillus galactomannan assays caused by different antibiotics. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010;42:461–468. doi: 10.3109/00365541003602064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Saghrouni F, Ben Youssef Y, Gheith S, Bouabid Z, Ben Abdeljelil J, et al. Twenty-nine cases of invasive aspergillosis in neutropenic patients. Med Mal Infect. 2011;41:657–662. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2011.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shahid M, Malik A, Bhargava R. Bronchogenic carcinoma and secondary aspergillosis—common yet unexplored. Cancer. 2008;113:547–558. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Becker MJ, Lugtenburg EJ, Cornelissen JJ, van der Schee C, Hoogsteden HC, et al. Galactomannan detection in computerized tomography-based broncho-alveolar lavage fluid and serum in haematological patients at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Br J Haematol. 2003;121:448–457. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04308.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sanguinetti M, Posteraro B, Pagano L, Pagliari G, Fianchi L, et al. Comparison of real-time PCR, conventional PCR, and galactomannan antigen detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from hematology patients for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:3922–3925. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3922-3925.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bergeron A, Belle A, Sulahian A, Lacroix C, Chevret S, et al. Contribution of galactomannan antigen detection in BAL to the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies. Chest. 2010;137:410–415. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Torelli R, Sanguinetti M, Moody A, Pagano L, Caira M, et al. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis by a commercial real-time PCR assay for Aspergillus DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from high-risk patients compared to a galactomannan enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:4273–4278. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05026-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Racil Z, Weinbergerova B, Kocmanova I, Muzik J, Kouba M, et al. Invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematological malignancies in the Czech and Slovak republics: Fungal InfectioN Database (FIND) analysis, 2005-2009. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17:e101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ağca H, Ener B, Yılmaz E, Ursavaş A, Kazak E, et al. Comparative evaluation of galactomannan optical density indices and culture results in bronchoscopic specimens obtained from neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients. Mycoses. 2014;57:169–175. doi: 10.1111/myc.12126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xavier MO, Araujo JS, Aquino VR, Severo CB, Guazzelli LS, et al. Variability in galactomannan detection by Platelia Aspergillus EIA™ according to the Aspergillus species. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2013;55:145–147. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652013000300001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Swanink CM, Meis JF, Rijs AJ, Donnelly JP, Verweij PE. Specificity of a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting Aspergillus galactomannan. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:257–260. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.257-260.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mennink-Kersten MA, Ruegebrink D, Wasei N, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. In vitro release by Aspergillus fumigatus of galactofuranose antigens, 1,3-β-D-glucan, and DNA, surrogate markers used for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:1711–1718. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1711-1718.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bono D, V, Mikulska M, Viscoli C. Diagnosis invasive Aspergillosis prophylaxis and treatment. Curr Opin Hematol. 2008;15:586–593. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e328311890c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dagenais TR, Keller NP. Pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus in invasive Aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:447–465. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00055-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hedayati MT, Pasqualotto AC, Warn PA, Bowyer P, Denning DW. Aspergillus flavus: human pathogen, allergen and mycotoxin producer. Microbiology. 2007;153:1677–1692. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/007641-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1

Articles from Journal of Medical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES