Abstract
Problem
The immune cellular composition of amniotic fluid is poorly understood. Herein, we determined the immunophenotype of amniotic fluid: 1) immune cells during the second and third trimester; 2) T cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs); and 3) immune cells during intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.
Method of Study
Amniotic fluid samples (n=57) were collected from women from 15-40 weeks of gestation without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. Samples from women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation were also included (n=9). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy adults were used as controls (n=3). Immunophenotyping was performed using flow cytometry.
Results
In the absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation, the amniotic fluid contained several immune cell populations from 15-40 weeks. Among these immune cells: 1) T cells and ILCs were greater than B cells and NK cells between 15 to 30 weeks; 2) T cells were most abundant between 15 to 30 weeks; 3) ILCs were most abundant between 15 to 20 weeks; 4) B cells were scarce between 15 to 20 weeks; yet, they increased and were constant after 20 weeks; 5) NK cells were greater between 15 to 30 weeks than at term; 6) ILCs expressed high levels of RORγt, CD161, and CD103 (i.e. Group 3 ILCs); 7) T cells expressed high levels of RORγt; 8) neutrophils increased as gestation progressed; and 9) monocytes/macrophages emerged after 20 weeks and remained constant until term. All of the amniotic fluid immune cells, except ILCs, were increased in the presence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.
Conclusions
The amniotic fluid harbors a diverse immune cellular composition during normal and complicated pregnancies.
Keywords: Immune cells, Leukocytes, Fetal Immunity, Bacteria, Microbes, Mucosal Immunity, T cells, B cells, Innate Lymphoid Cells, NK cells, Neutrophils, Monocytes, Macrophages, Microbial Invasion of the Amniotic Cavity, Intra-amniotic infection, Intra-amniotic inflammation
INTRODUCTION
Amniotic fluid is the protective liquid that surrounds the fetus throughout gestation, and therefore is essential for fetal development and maturation1. Besides containing nutrients and other factors required for fetal growth, the amniotic fluid provides mechanical cushioning and represents an immunological barrier against invading pathogens1, 2. The amniotic fluid is used as a diagnostic tool for assessing fetal well-being3–7, lung maturity8–11, karyotype12–15 and intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation16–74. During early development, the amniotic fluid is an extension of the fetal extracellular matrix75. As the placenta and fetal vessels emerge, water and solutes from the maternal plasma diffuse into the amniotic fluid76. By 8 weeks of gestation, the urethra is formed and the fetal kidneys start producing urine77. Shortly after, fetal swallowing begins75; however, these processes do not contribute to the amniotic fluid volume until the second half of pregnancy77. After 25 weeks of gestation, the fetal skin is fully keratinized78 and the amniotic fluid volume is determined by factors comprising the amniotic fluid circulation (fetal urine, respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, umbilical cord, and placenta)75, 77–80.
The amniotic fluid contains soluble and cellular components77. The soluble components include carbohydrates, proteins, peptides, lipids, lactate, pyruvate, electrolytes, enzymes, and hormones, among others81–99, many of which act as the first line of defense against pathogens invading the amniotic cavity100–106. The cellular components of the amniotic fluid include different cell types derived from exfoliating surfaces of the developing fetus, including the skin, respiratory system, urinary tract, and gastrointestinal tract, as well as stem cells107–115. Some cytological studies have shown that, in the absence of infection, the amniotic fluid also includes a low number of innate immune cells including macrophages110, 111, 116–118, neutrophils23, 69, and the recently described innate lymphoid cells or ILCs119. Yet, the number of macrophages and/or ILCs is increased in pathological conditions in which fetal organs are exposed to the amniotic fluid (e.g. neural tube defects118, 120–125 and gastroschisis118, 126–128). The number of amniotic fluid neutrophils, on the other hand, is a useful marker for intra-amniotic inflammation23, 27, 67–69, 129–132. However, in the absence of infection and/or inflammation or birth defects, the immune cellular composition of the amniotic fluid is still poorly understood.
The aims of this study were: 1) to determine the immunophenotype of amniotic fluid leukocytes during the second and third trimester, 2) to investigate whether amniotic fluid T cells and ILCs display different phenotypical characteristics to that of peripheral cells; and 3) to evaluate whether the amniotic fluid immune cells are altered in women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population
This was a cross-sectional study of patients who underwent transabdominal amniocentesis due to clinical indications or amniocentesis during cesarean section. Patients were enrolled at Hutzel Women’s Hospital of the Detroit Medical Center (September 2016 – January 2017). The first group of patients (n=57, absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation) was selected based on the following exclusion criteria: positive amniotic fluid culture20, 39, 54, white blood cell (WBC) count >50 cells/mm3 23, Glucose concentration <14 mg/dL22, amniotic fluid interleukin (IL)-6 concentration >2.6 ng/mL39, positive Gram stain17 and/or bacterial live/dead staining68, and samples from women with an intra-uterine fetal demise and/or birth defects. A second group of patients with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation was also included (n=9). Intra-amniotic infection/inflammation was defined as the presence of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) with intra-amniotic inflammation39, 47, 48, 50–56. All of the samples with visible blood contamination were excluded from this study. Viable cell numbers were determined using an automatic cell counter (Cellometer Auto 2000, Nexcelom Bioscience, Lawrence, MA, USA).
All patients provided written informed consent to donate additional amniotic fluid for research purposes, according to protocols approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Detroit Medical Center (Detroit, MI, USA), Wayne State University and the Perinatology Research Branch, an intramural program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS).
Sample collection
Amniotic fluid was retrieved by transabdominal amniocentesis under antiseptic conditions using a 22-gauge needle monitored by ultrasound. Amniotic fluid was also retrieved by amniocentesis during cesarean section under antiseptic conditions. Amniotic fluid samples were transported to the clinical laboratory in a capped sterile syringe and were cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, as well as for genital Mycoplasmas23, 54. Shortly after collection, WBC count in amniotic fluid samples was determined by using a hemocytometer chamber, according to methods previously described23. Glucose concentration22 was also determined and Gram stain17 was performed in amniotic fluid samples. Cultures, WBC count, glucose concentration, and Gram Stain were not performed in amniotic fluid samples collected during cesarean section, since these samples were collected for research purposes only. However, both IL-6 concentration39 and the presence of bacteria (bacterial live/dead staining68) were assessed in all of the amniotic fluid samples.
Determination of interleukin-6 in the amniotic fluid
IL-6 concentrations in the amniotic fluid were determined using a sensitive and specific enzyme immunoassay obtained from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). The IL-6 concentrations were determined by interpolation from the standard curves. The inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation for IL-6 were 8.7% and 4.6%, respectively. The detection limit of the IL-6 assay was 0.09 pg/mL.
Detection of live/dead bacteria in the amniotic fluid
The presence of bacteria in the amniotic fluid (n=66) was evaluated as previously described68, 133, using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight™ Bacterial Viability Kit (Cat# L7007, Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York) in a sterile biosafety cabinet. Briefly, 100μL of amniotic fluid were mixed with 900μL of sterile 1X phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Life Technologies). Three microliters of the dye mix (Component A and B were mixed at a 1:1 ratio) were added to the cell suspension and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Next, the cells were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min and the supernatant was discarded. The cell pellet was then re-suspended in 5μL of 1X PBS, and a slide smear was prepared and air-dried. Lastly, the slide was gently rinsed with 1X PBS and mounted with ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole or DAPI (Life Technologies). The presence of bacteria was evaluated using an Olympus BX 60 fluorescence microscope with an Olympus DP71 camera and DP Controller Software (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Peripheral blood samples were collected by venipuncture into EDTA-containing tubes from healthy individuals (n=3). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated using the density gradient reagent Ficoll-Paque Plus (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Immunophenotyping
Amniotic fluid samples (5 to 6 mL; n=66) were passed through a sterile15-μm filter to remove most epithelial cells and centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 minutes at room temperature. The resulting amniotic fluid leukocyte pellet or PBMCs were re-suspended in 1mL of 1X PBS and stained with the BD Horizon Fixable Viability Stain 510 dye (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), prior to incubation with extracellular monoclonal antibodies (Supplementary Table 1). Cells were washed in 1X PBS and incubated with 20μL of human FcR blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA, USA) in 80μL of BD FACS stain buffer for 10 min at 4°C. Next, cells were incubated with extracellular fluorochrome-conjugated anti-human monoclonal antibodies for 30 min at 4°C in the dark (Supplementary Table 1). Following extracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using the FoxP3 Transcription Factor Fixation/Permeabilization solution (Cat#00-5523-00; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). Following fixation and permeabilization, cells were washed with 1X FoxP3 Permeabilization Buffer (eBioscience), re-suspended in 50 μl of the same buffer, and stained with intracellular antibodies for 30 minutes at 4°C in the dark (Supplementary Table 2). Isotope controls were also prepared. Stained cells were then washed with 1X permeabilization buffer, re-suspended in 0.5mL of BD FACS stain buffer, and acquired using the BD LSR Fortessa Flow Cytometer (BD Bioscience) and BD FACSDiva 6.0 software (BD Bioscience). The analysis was performed and the figures were generated using the FlowJo v10 software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA). The absolute number of cells was determined using CountBright absolute counting beads (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA).
Imaging flow cytometry of amniotic fluid leukocytes
Amniotic fluid samples (1-10 mL; n=5) were passed through a sterile15-μm filter (Cat# 43-50015-03; pluriSelect Life Science, Leipzig, Germany) to remove most epithelial cells and centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 minutes at room temperature. The cell pellet (mostly leukocytes) was washed with 1X PBS, re-suspended in 80 μL of BD FACS stain buffer (Cat#554656; BD Biosciences) containing 20 μL of human FcR blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec), and incubated for 10 min at 4°C. Next, the amniotic fluid leukocytes were stained separately with the following two panels of extracellular fluorochrome-conjugated anti-human antibodies (BD Biosciences) for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. One antibody panel included CD45-APC (Clone HI30, Cat#555485), CD56-PE (clone NCAM16.2, Cat#340363), CD14- Alexa Fluor® 488 (clone MφP9, Cat#562689) and CD15-PE-CF594 (clone W6D3, Cat#562372). The second panel included CD45-APC (Clone HI30), CD19- PE (clone HIB19, Cat#555413), CD3- Alexa Fluor® 488 (clone UCHT1, Cat#557694) and CD127-PE-CF594 (clone HIL-7R-M21, Cat#562397). Following antibody staining, amniotic fluid leukocytes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) for 20 min at room temperature. Amniotic fluid cells were then rehydrated in 1X PBS and stained with 3 μM DAPI (Cat#D9542, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a nuclear permeabilization buffer (Cat#00-8333-56, eBiosciences) for 15 min at room temperature. Lastly, amniotic fluid cells were suspended in 50 μL BD FACS stain buffer containing 1mg/ml EDTA (Cat#15575-038, Life Technologies). Samples were acquired using an ImageStream®X Mk II imaging cytometer (Amnis, Seattle, WA) at the Microscopy, Imaging, and Cytometry Resources Core at the Wayne State University School of Medicine (Detroit, MI, USA) (http://micr.med.wayne.edu/). Images were obtained at a magnification of 60X using the low flow rate/high sensitivity INSPIRE software (Amnis) and the following lasers: 405nm, 488nm and 642nm. Acquired images were analyzed using the IDEALS 6.2 software (Amnis).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v. 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). Kruskal–Wallis tests followed by Mann-Whitney U-tests were used for unpaired comparisons among study groups. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for paired comparisons. t-SNE plots were generated using the FlowJo v10 software. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Characteristics of the study population
A total of 66 amniotic fluid samples from women who underwent transabdominal amniocentesis before delivery or during cesarean section were included in this study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are displayed in Tables 1 and 2. Most of the amniotic fluid samples were collected from African-American women (Table 1). The number of amniotic fluid samples per group is displayed in Table 2. Amniotic fluid samples obtained between 15 and 20 weeks of gestation were mostly collected from women who underwent an amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping and delivered term neonates (Table 2). Amniotic fluid samples obtained between 20-36 weeks of gestation were collected from women who underwent an amniocentesis for the detection of intra-amniotic infection and/or inflammation (negative) and delivered preterm neonates (Table 2). Amniotic fluid samples obtained between 36-40 weeks of gestation were mostly collected from women during the cesarean section procedure and who delivered term neonates (Table 2). Amniotic fluid samples from women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation were collected from 18 to 40 weeks of gestation (Table 2).
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of the study population
Study population (n=66) |
|
---|---|
| |
Maternal Age years; median (IQR) |
25.5 (23-29.3) |
| |
Body mass index kg/m2; median (IQR) |
30.8 (24.6-38.6) |
| |
Primiparity | 18.8% |
| |
Race | |
African-American | 89.1% |
Caucasian | 4.7% |
Asian | 3.1% |
Other | 3.1% |
| |
Smoking | 21.9% |
IQR, interquartile range
Table 2.
Clinical characteristics of the study population
Groups | Number of samples | Gestational age at amniocentesis weeks; median (IQR) |
IL-6 concentration ng/mL; median (IQR) |
Gestational age at delivery weeks; median (IQR) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation | 15-20 weeks | 6 | 17.7 (16.4-18.8) |
0.3 (0.1-0.8) |
38.4 (38.4-39.3) |
20-30 weeks | 8 | 23.2 (21.6-27.2) |
0.5 (0.2-0.9) |
28.6 (24.5-35.6) |
|
30-36 weeks | 9 | 32.3 (31.4-33.3) |
0.3 (0.2-0.4) |
33.9 (32.3-36) |
|
37-40 weeks | 34 | 39 (38.9-39.3) |
0.3 (0.3-0.7) |
39 (38.9-39.3) |
|
Intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (18-40 weeks) |
9 | 38.1 (22.3-39.6) |
70.6 (6.4-118.7) |
38.1 (22.7-39.6) |
IQR, interquartile range
The immunophenotype of amniotic fluid leukocytes during second and third trimester in the absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation
First, we investigated the diversity of amniotic fluid leukocytes during the second and third trimesters. Figure 1 shows representative t-SNE plots demonstrating that different immune cell populations are present throughout gestation. T cells and ILCs were the most abundant immune cell populations between 15 to 20 weeks of gestation (Figure 1A). Between 20 to 30 weeks of gestation, B cells, monocytes and neutrophils emerged, and while T cells were still abundant ILCs were drastically reduced (Figure 1B). Between 30 to 36 weeks of gestation, neutrophils and monocytes were greater than other cell types, and B cells were lower than earlier in gestation (Figure 1C). Lastly, neutrophils were the larger immune cell population between 37-40 weeks of gestation; yet, monocytes were still abundant and B cells were detectable (Figure 1D).
Figure 1.
The immunophenotype of amniotic fluid leukocytes during the second and third trimester. Flow cytometry analysis of immune cells was performed and t-SNE plots were generated from flow cytometry data. Dot plots (upper row) and contour plots (lower row) represent immune cell diversity and abundance in amniotic fluids collected at (A) 15-20, (B) 20-30, (C) 30-36, or (D) 37-40 weeks of gestation. Pink = ILCs, purple = NK cells, orange = B cells, green = T cells, red = monocytes/macrophages, and blue = neutrophils.
Lymphoid cells in the amniotic fluid during the second and third trimester in the absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation
Lymphoid cells were abundant between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation (Figure 1A&B); therefore, we first determined which lymphoid subset was more abundant during this period. The gating strategy used to identify lymphoid cells in the amniotic fluid is shown in Figure 2A. Briefly, total leukocytes were identified as CD45+ cells within the singlets and viability gates. Identified lymphoid cells in the amniotic fluid included: T cells (CD45+CD15-CD14- CD19-CD3+ cells), B cells (CD45+CD15-CD14-CD3-CD19+ cells), NK cells (CD45+CD15-CD14- CD19-CD3-CD19-CD94+CD56+ cells), and ILCs (CD45+CD15-CD14-CD19-CD3-CD94-CD127+ cells) (Figure 2A). A previous report showed that most of the amniotic fluid ILCs expressed CD56119; therefore, we detected both CD56+ and CD56- ILCs (Figure 2A). Flow cytometry quantification revealed that T cells and ILCs were more abundant than B cells and NK cells in the amniotic fluid of women between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation (Figure 2B). In addition, we found that the CD56+ and CD56- ILC subsets were present in similar numbers (Figure 2C). These data indicate that T cells and ILCs are the most abundant population in the amniotic fluid of women between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation in the absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.
Figure 2.
T cells and ILCs are the dominant immune cell subsets in the amniotic fluid during the second trimester. (A) Flow cytometry gating strategy for immunophenotyping of immune cells. Immune cells were initially gated within the viability gate and CD45+ gate followed by lineage gating (CD15, CD14, CD19, CD3, CD94, CD56, CD127). (B) Numbers of T cells, ILCs, B cells, and NK cells in the amniotic fluid of women at 15-30 weeks of gestation. (C) Numbers of CD56- or CD56+ ILCs in the amniotic fluid of women at 15-30 weeks of gestation. n=14 per group.
Next, we determined the abundance of all of the lymphoid cell populations during the second and third trimester (Figure 3). Amniotic fluid T cells were more abundant between 20 to 30 weeks of gestation than after 37 weeks of gestation (Figure 3A). A flow cytometry image of an amniotic fluid T cell during the second trimester is shown in Figure 3B. Amniotic fluid ILCs were most abundant between 15 to 20 weeks of gestation (Figure 3C), as previously reported119. Yet, their number reduced after 20 and 30 weeks of gestation and remained low after 37 weeks of gestation (Figure 3C). A flow cytometry image of an amniotic fluid ILC during the second trimester is shown in Figure 3D. Amniotic fluid B cells did not significantly change during the second and third trimester; yet, their lowest number was observed between 15 to 20 weeks of gestation (Figure 3E). A flow cytometry image of an amniotic fluid B cell during the second trimester is shown in Figure 3F. Amniotic fluid NK cells were more abundant between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation than at term (>37 weeks) (Figure 3G). A flow cytometry image of an amniotic fluid NK cell during the second trimester is shown in Figure 3H. Together, these data indicate that amniotic fluid T cells and ILCs, followed by NK cells, are most abundant between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation. These results also show that although B cells are low in number, such cells are a constant immune cell population in the amniotic fluid during the second and trimester in the absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.
Figure 3.
Number of lymphoid cells in the amniotic fluid during the second and third trimester. The numbers of T cells (A), ILCs (C), B cells (E), and NK cells (G) in the amniotic fluid of women at 15-20, 20-30, 30-36, or 37-40 weeks of gestation. Imaging flow cytometry analysis showing (from Left to Right): BF, bright field imaging, nuclear (DAPI) staining, CD3 (B), CD127+ (D), CD19+ (F), or CD56 (H) expression, as well as CD45 expression, and the merged fluorescence image of an amniotic fluid T, ILC, B, or NK cell, respectively. n=6-34 per group.
Immunophenotyping of ILCs and T cells in the amniotic fluid in the absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation
A previous study reported that most of the amniotic fluid ILCs belong to the Group 3 since they express RORγt and CD161 as well as produce high levels of IL-17 and TNFα119. It was also shown that these fetal Group 3 ILCs express CD103 (a hallmark of intraepithelial cells) and were present in the amniotic fluid but not in the peripheral circulation119. We therefore investigated whether ILCs express RORγt, CD161, and CD103 in the amniotic fluid and peripheral blood of healthy adults (Figure 4A). Most of the amniotic fluid ILCs expressed RORγt as well as were double positive for CD161 and CD103 (i.e. Group 3 ILCs) (Figure 4 B&C); however, the expression of these markers was minimal in peripheral ILCs (Figure 4B&C). Flow cytometric quantification consistently revealed that the proportions of CD56+/CD56-RORγt+ ILCs (Figure 4D&E) and CD56+/CD56-CD161+CD103+ ILCs (Figure 4F&G) were higher in the amniotic fluid than in the peripheral circulation.
Figure 4.
Amniotic fluid ILCs expressing RORγt, CD161, and CD103. (A) Mononuclear cells were isolated from the amniotic fluid of women at 15-30 weeks of gestation or the peripheral blood (PBMCs) from healthy adults. Flow cytometry gating strategy for immunophenotyping of CD127+ ILCs within the lineage negative (Lineage-; CD15-CD14-CD3-CD19-CD56-CD11b-CD94-) and CD56 positive or negative (CD56+/-) gates. (B) Flow cytometry gating strategy for immunophenotyping of RORγt+ ILCs within the Lineage-CD56+CD127+ or Lineage-CD56-CD127+ gates. (C) Flow cytometry gating strategy for immunophenotyping of CD103+CD161+ ILCs within the Lineage-CD56+CD127+ or Lineage-CD56-CD127+ gates. (D) Percentage of CD127+CD56+RORγt+ ILCs in PBMCs or the amniotic fluid. (E) Percentage of CD127+CD56- RORγt+ ILCs in PBMCs or the amniotic fluid. (F) Percentage of CD127+CD56+CD161+CD103+ ILCs in PBMCs or the amniotic fluid. (G) Percentage of CD127+CD56-CD161+CD103+ ILCs in PBMCs or the amniotic fluid. n=3-11 per group.
T cells were abundant in the amniotic fluid of women between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation; therefore, we determined whether such cells expressed the same markers as ILCs. Similar to amniotic fluid ILCs, a high proportion of amniotic fluid T cells (Figure 5A) expressed RORγt (Figure 5B). The proportion of RORγt+ T cells was greater in the amniotic fluid than in the peripheral circulation (Figure 5C). Distinct to amniotic fluid ILCs, only ~30% of amniotic fluid T cells were double positive for CD161 and CD103 (Figure 5D). Yet, the proportion of CD161+CD103+ T cells was higher in the amniotic fluid than in the peripheral circulation (Figure 5E).
Figure 5.
Amniotic fluid T cells expressing RORγt, CD161, and CD103. (A) Mononuclear cells were isolated from the amniotic fluid of women at 15-30 weeks of gestation or the peripheral blood (PBMCs) from healthy adults. Flow cytometry gating strategy for immunophenotyping of CD3+ T cells within the CD45+CD15-CD14- gate. (B) Flow cytometry gating strategy for immunophenotyping of RORγt+ T cells within the CD45+CD15-CD14-CD3+ gate. (C) Percentage of CD3+RORγt+ T cells in PBMCs or the amniotic fluid. (D) Flow cytometry gating strategy for immunophenotyping of CD103+CD161+ T cells within the CD45+CD15-CD14-CD3+ gate. (E) Percentage of CD3+CD161+CD103+ T cells in PBMCs or the amniotic fluid. n=3-12 per group.
Taken together, these results indicate that Group 3 ILCs and RORγt+ T cells are present in the amniotic fluid between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation in the absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.
Myeloid cells in the amniotic fluid during the second and third trimester in the absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation
Next, we quantified the number of myeloid cells in the amniotic fluid of women during the second and third trimester. The gating strategy used to identify neutrophils and monocytes in the amniotic fluid is shown in Figure 6A. Briefly, total leukocytes were identified as CD45+ cells within the singlets and viability gates. Identified myeloid cells in the amniotic fluid included neutrophils (CD45+CD14-CD15+ cells) and monocytes/macrophages (CD45+CD15-CD14+ cells) (Figure 6A). The number of amniotic fluid neutrophils increased gradually from 15 weeks to term gestation (Figure 6B). The number of amniotic fluid monocytes/macrophages was greater between 20 to 40 weeks compared to 15-20 weeks of gestation (Figure 6C). Yet, the number of these myeloid cells did not peak at term pregnancy as occurred with amniotic fluid neutrophils (Figure 6B vs. C). Lastly, neutrophils were more abundant than monocytes/macrophages in the amniotic fluid of women at term (Figure 7A). A flow cytometry image of an amniotic fluid neutrophil or monocyte/macrophage during the third trimester is shown in Figure 7B or 7C, respectively. These data show the number of amniotic fluid neutrophils increases as gestation progresses, and that monocyte/macrophages are a constant immune cell population after 20 weeks of gestation in the absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.
Figure 6.
Myeloid cells in the amniotic fluid during the second and third trimester. (A) Flow cytometry gating strategy for immunophenotyping of myeloid cells. Cells were initially gated within the viability gate and CD45+ gate followed by CD15 and CD14 gating. (B) The numbers of neutrophils in the amniotic fluid of women at 15-20, 20-30, 30-36, or 37-40 weeks of gestation. (C) The numbers of monocytes/macrophages in the amniotic fluid of women at 15-20, 20-30, 30-36, or 37-40 weeks of gestation. n=6-34 per group.
Figure 7.
Neutrophils are the dominant myeloid subset in the amniotic fluid at term. (A) Numbers of CD15+ neutrophils and CD14+ monocytes/macrophages in the amniotic fluid from women at term. (B) Imaging flow cytometry analysis showing (from L-R): BF, bright field imaging, nuclear (DAPI) staining, CD15 expression, CD45 expression, and the merged fluorescence image of an amniotic fluid neutrophil. (C) Imaging flow cytometry analysis showing (from L-R): BF, bright field imaging, nuclear (DAPI) staining, CD14 expression, CD45 expression, and the merged fluorescence image of an amniotic fluid monocyte/macrophage. n=34 per group.
Immune cells in the amniotic fluid of women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation
Previous studies have shown that intra-amniotic infection is characterized by the infiltration of neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages23, 27, 67–69, 129–132. It was recently suggested that amniotic fluid ILCs were also implicated in regulating intra-amniotic infection and inflammation in preterm gestations119. Therefore, we evaluated whether amniotic fluid immune cells were increased in women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. All of the amniotic fluid immune cells, except ILCs, were increased in cases with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (Figure 8). The numbers of ILCs in the amniotic fluid collected at 18-22 weeks of gestation from women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation were similar to those in gestational age-matched amniotic fluids from women without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (Supplementary Figure 1). The numbers of neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages were greater than T cells, ILCs, B cells, and NK cells in the amniotic fluid of women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (Figure 8). Collectively, these data indicate that all of the amniotic fluid immune cells, except ILCs, are implicated in the inflammatory response implicated in intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.
Figure 8.
Immune cells in the amniotic fluid during intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. The numbers of (A) T cells, (B) ILCs, (C) B cells, (D) NK cells, (E) neutrophils, and (F) monocytes/macrophages in the amniotic fluid of women with or without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. n=9-57 per group.
DISCUSSION
Principal findings
In the absence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation: 1) several immune cell populations were detected in the amniotic fluid during the second and third trimester; 2) T cells and ILCs were greater than B cells and NK cells in the amniotic fluid between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation; 3) amniotic fluid T cells were most abundant between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation; 4) amniotic fluid ILCs were most abundant between 15 to 20 weeks of gestation; 5) amniotic fluid B cells did not significantly vary during the second and third trimester, yet, they were scarce between 15 to 20 weeks of gestation; 6) amniotic fluid NK cells were greater between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation than at term; 7) amniotic fluid ILCs expressed high levels of RORγt, CD161, and CD103 (i.e. Group 3 ILCs); 8) amniotic fluid T cells expressed high levels of RORγt; 9) amniotic fluid neutrophils increased as gestation progressed; 10) amniotic fluid monocytes/macrophages emerged after 20 weeks of gestation and remained constant until term; and 11) neutrophils were more abundant than monocytes/macrophages in the amniotic fluid of women at term. Lastly, we found that all of the amniotic fluid immune cells, except ILCs, were increased in the presence of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation.
Amniotic fluid innate lymphoid cells (ILCs)
Recently, it was shown that Group 3 ILCs are present in the human amniotic fluid between 15 to 16 weeks of gestation (second trimester)119. Such innate lymphocytes expressed the intraepithelial marker CD103, suggesting that they were derived from the fetal intestine119. This concept was supported by the fact that Group 3 ILCs were found in the fetal small intestine and lung, and these cells displayed a similar phenotype to that detected in the amniotic fluid119. Herein, we extended these findings by demonstrating that the human amniotic fluid contains Group 3 ILCs (RORγt+CD161+CD103+ ILCs) during the second and third trimester; yet, their number is highest earlier in pregnancy.
Previous studies have shown that fetal tissues include different subsets of ILCs. In humans, both ILC2-like (Lin-CRTH2+CD127+ cells) and ILC3-like (Lin-CD127+NKp44+ expressing RORγt) subsets were found in the fetal gut at 14-17 weeks of gestation134. In addition, Group 2 ILCs (GATA3+ ILCs) have been detected in the umbilical cord blood of term neonates135. In mice, fetal RORγt+ ILC progenitors mature in the fetal liver environment136, 137 in a Notch2-dependent manner138. However, non-hepatic ILC progenitors may exist in the fetal intestine139. While Group 3 ILCs exist in the fetal murine intestine early in pregnancy, a particular subset which is only a fraction of murine intestinal ILCs seems to rapidly expand shortly after birth140, which may be related to the colonization of the fetal gut by commensal microbes. Moreover, fetuses with gastroschisis had increased Group 2 and Group 3 ILCs in the sections of intestine exposed to the amniotic fluid, suggesting that these cells participate in the inflammatory environment that leads to fetal bowel damage128.
Herein, we showed that amniotic fluid ILCs were not significantly increased in women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation between 18 to 22 weeks of gestation; yet, this finding needs to be further investigated using a larger number of samples. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that ILCs, in particular Group 3 ILCs, are an important immune cell subset in both the amniotic cavity and the developing fetus.
Amniotic fluid T cells
To our knowledge, we are the first to report that T cells are an abundant immune cell population in the amniotic fluid between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation (mostly the second trimester). It is likely that these adaptive immune cells are derived from the fetus since most of the amniotic fluid leukocytes in early gestation are of fetal origin67. In addition, amniotic fluid T cells expressed high levels of RORγt similar to what was observed in amniotic fluid Group 3 ILCs of fetal origin119.
In humans, T cells are detected in the fetal lymphoid tissues as early as 10 weeks of gestation141. By 12-14 weeks of gestation, T cells are found in the fetal intestine, spleen, and lymph nodes; yet, they are more abundant by the end of the second trimester142. At this time, secondary fetal lymphoid tissues contain a high proportion of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells or Tregs143, 144 which are mostly generated in response to maternal alloantigens145. Fetal Tregs strongly suppress both natural fetal T-cell activity144 and responses against maternal antigens to prevent maternal-fetal rejection143, 144, 146. The induction of maternal-specific fetal Tregs is orchestrated by transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), which is produced by the fetal lymph nodes145.
Th17 cells have also been identified in the cord blood of term neonates; yet, their proportions are higher in preterm neonates exposed to histologic chorioamnionitis147. Th17 cells are characterized by the expression of RORγt and production of IL-17148. Indeed, Tregs can promote a Th17-like phenotype in the context of inflammation149 and Tregs can express RORγt to enhance their suppressive activity during intestinal inflammation150. Here, we identified T cells in the amniotic fluid that express RORγt, which are greater in cases with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation, suggesting that these cells participate in the inflammatory process against microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Further research is required in order to investigate whether amniotic fluid T cells are indeed of fetal origin and whether these cells have pro-inflammatory and/or immunosuppressive functions.
Amniotic fluid B cells
The data herein showed that B cells are constantly present during the second and third trimester; yet, these cells are very rare between 15-20 weeks of gestation. Previous observations67, 119 make us suggest that amniotic fluid B cells may be of fetal origin. Fetal pro/pre-B cells can be detected in the omentum as early as 8 weeks of gestation and B-cells can be detected in the liver and spleen at 12 weeks151. At this point, approximately 40% of these B cells express CD5, a marker of fetal B-cell linage152, 153. By 23 weeks of gestation, 90% of fetal splenic B cells express CD5 (B1-like cells), which gradually reduce to adult levels (25-35%) by late adolescence154. B-1 cells (CD5+ B cells) are responsible for production of antibodies in response to bacterial cell wall components155. Therefore, these cells limit bacterial colonization before induction of adaptive immune responses156, 157. Indeed, it was also suggested that the fetal B cell system could be considered an intermediate between the innate immune system and the adaptive immune system158. Here, we provided evidence that amniotic fluid B cells are increased in women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation supporting the hypothesis that these adaptive immune cells participate in the fetal host response against microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity.
Amniotic fluid natural killer (NK) cells
In the current study, we found that the amniotic fluid includes NK cells, which are most abundant between 15 to 30 weeks of gestation (mostly the second trimester). It is likely that amniotic fluid NK cells are derived from the fetus since most of the identified immune cells in this compartment are of fetal origin during this period67, 119.
Fetal NK cells are detected as early as 6 weeks of gestation159. After 18 weeks of gestation, the proportion of NK cells is increased in the fetal liver equaling the proportion of T cells159. Fetal NK cells are implicated in cytokine- and antibody-mediated NK cell responses in utero; yet, they remain hyporesponsive to HLA class I–negative or allogeneic cells160, which could be considered a mechanism for maternal-fetal tolerance161, 162. Taken together, these findings suggest that amniotic fluid NK cells could participate in the mechanisms of maternal-fetal tolerance taking place in the fetal compartments. The fact that amniotic fluid NK cells are increased in women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation suggests that these cells are also implicated in the fetal host response against microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity.
Amniotic fluid neutrophils
Our results showed that amniotic fluid neutrophils increased as gestation progressed, and their number was even greater in women with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. Amniotic fluid neutrophils can be of fetal and/or maternal origin67. Amniotic fluid neutrophils are mostly of fetal origin during preterm gestation whereas these cells are of maternal origin at term67. Regardless of their origin, amniotic fluid neutrophils are a part of the innate immune host defense mechanisms that take place in the amniotic cavity of women with intra-amniotic infection77, 163, 164. This concept is supported by evidence demonstrating that amniotic fluid neutrophils 1) are a source of anti-microbial products90, 165–168 and cytokines69, 2) can trap and kill bacteria invading the amniotic cavity by forming neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)68, and 3) can phagocytize microorganisms commonly found in the lower genital tract, e.g., Streptococcus agalactiae (also known as Group B Streptococcus or GBS), Ureaplasma urealyticum, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Escherichia coli132. Together, these findings show that even in the absence of microbial invasion, neutrophils are present in the amniotic fluid throughout gestation and ready to participate in the host defense mechanisms taking place in the amniotic cavity.
Amniotic fluid monocytes/macrophages
Macrophages have been previously observed in the amniotic fluid from normal pregnancies using cytological techniques110, 111, 116, 117. By using high dimensional flow cytometry, we found that monocytes/macrophages are consistently present in the amniotic fluid of women after 20 weeks of gestation. Monocytes emerged during the second trimester suggesting that they have a fetal origin, as the neutrophils do67.
Fetal macrophages are observed in the early stages of embryonic development169. Such cells originate in the yolk sac, fetal liver, and bone marrow169–171 and can colonize developing organs to become tissue residents which persist until adulthood172. During pregnancy, Hofbauer cells (fetal macrophages) reside in the placental villous tree173–175, indicating that this can be a potential source for amniotic fluid macrophages. In cases with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation, monocytes/macrophages are abundant and expressed high levels of IL-1α and IL-1β69. These cytokines participate in the process of parturition176–178 and host response to intra-amniotic infection176, 178–185.
Conclusions
The amniotic fluid harbors a diverse immune cellular composition during the second and third trimester. Between 15 to 20 weeks, ILCs are the most abundant in the amniotic fluid. T cells and ILCs, followed by NK cells, are more abundant between 15 to 30 weeks than at term. B cells are rare between 15 to 20 weeks but they are a constant immune cell population until full term. While neutrophils increase as gestations progresses, monocytes/macrophages emerged after 20 weeks and remained constant until term. All of the amniotic fluid immune cells, except ILCs, are increased in cases with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation. These findings provide insight into the biology of the amniotic fluid leukocytes during normal and complicated pregnancies.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was supported, in part, by the Perinatology Research Branch (PRB), Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), and, in part, with federal funds from the NICHD/NIH/DHHS under Contract No. HHSN275201300006C. This research was also supported by the Wayne State University Perinatal Initiative in Maternal, Perinatal and Child Health. We thank the physicians and nurses from the Center for Advanced Obstetrical Care and Research and the Intrapartum Unit, as well as the research assistants from the PRB Clinical Laboratory, for their help in collecting samples.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Schmidt W. The amniotic fluid compartment: the fetal habitat. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 1992;127:1–100. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-77300-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Davis LE, McLaren LC, Stewart JA, James CG, Levine MD, Skipper BJ. Immunological and microbiological studies of midtrimester amniotic fluid. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1983;16:261–268. doi: 10.1159/000299275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cherry SH. Amniotic fluid analysis as an index of fetal health in utero. Med Times. 1967;95:713–717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barham KA. Amnioscopy, meconium and fetal well-being. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969;76:412–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1969.tb05856.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schifrin BS, Guntes V, Gergely RC, Eden R, Roll K, Jacobs J. The role of real-time scanning in antenatal fetal surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;140:525–530. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90228-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Clark SL, Romero R, Dildy GA, Callaghan WM, Smiley RM, Bracey AW, Hankins GD, D’Alton ME, Foley M, Pacheco LD, Vadhera RB, Herlihy JP, Berkowitz RL, Belfort MA. Proposed diagnostic criteria for the case definition of amniotic fluid embolism in research studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:408–412. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tarui T, Kim A, Flake A, McClain L, Stratigis JD, Fried I, Newman R, Slonim DK, Bianchi DW. Amniotic fluid transcriptomics reflects novel disease mechanisms in fetuses with myelomeningocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:587 e581–587 e510. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hobbins JC, Brock W, Speroff L, Anderson GG, Caldwell B. L-S ratio in predicting pulmonary maturity in utero. Obstet Gynecol. 1972;39:660–664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gluck L. The evaluation of fetal lung maturity. Calif Med. 1972;116:58–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Winn HN, Romero R, Roberts A, Liu H, Hobbins JC. Comparison of fetal lung maturation in preterm singleton and twin pregnancies. Am J Perinatol. 1992;9:326–328. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Palacio M, Bonet-Carne E, Cobo T, Perez-Moreno A, Sabria J, Richter J, Kacerovsky M, Jacobsson B, Garcia-Posada RA, Bugatto F, Santisteve R, Vives A, Parra-Cordero M, Hernandez-Andrade E, Bartha JL, Carretero-Lucena P, Tan KL, Cruz-Martinez R, Burke M, Vavilala S, Iruretagoyena I, Delgado JL, Schenone M, Vilanova J, Botet F, Yeo GSH, Hyett J, Deprest J, Romero R, Gratacos E, Fetal Lung Texture T. Prediction of neonatal respiratory morbidity by quantitative ultrasound lung texture analysis: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:196 e191–196 e114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jacobson CB, Barter RH. Intrauterine diagnosis and management of genetic defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967;99:796–807. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(67)90395-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Valenti C, Schutta EJ, Kehaty T. Cytogenetic diagnosis of Down’s syndrome in utero. JAMA. 1969;207:1513–1515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santesson B, Akesson HO, Book JA, Brosset A. Karyotyping human amnitic-fluid cels. Lancet. 1969;2:1067–1068. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)90664-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lisgar F, Gertner M, Cherry S, Hsu LY, Hirschhorn K. Prenatal chromosome analysis. Nature. 1970;225:280–281. doi: 10.1038/225280a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Romero R, Emamian M, Quintero R, Wan M, Hobbins JC, Mitchell MD. Amniotic fluid prostaglandin levels and intra-amniotic infections. Lancet. 1986;1:1380. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91685-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Romero R, Emamian M, Quintero R, Wan M, Hobbins JC, Mazor M, Edberg S. The value and limitations of the Gram stain examination in the diagnosis of intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159:114–119. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90503-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Romero R, Emamian M, Quintero R, Wan M, Scioscia AL, Hobbins JC, Edberg S. Diagnosis of intra-amniotic infection: the acridine orange stain. Am J Perinatol. 1989;6:41–45. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Romero R, Manogue KR, Mitchell MD, Wu YK, Oyarzun E, Hobbins JC, Cerami A. Infection and labor. IV. Cachectin-tumor necrosis factor in the amniotic fluid of women with intraamniotic infection and preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:336–341. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90515-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Romero R, Sirtori M, Oyarzun E, Avila C, Mazor M, Callahan R, Sabo V, Athanassiadis AP, Hobbins JC. Infection and labor. V. Prevalence, microbiology, and clinical significance of intraamniotic infection in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:817–824. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Romero R, Avila C, Santhanam U, Sehgal PB. Amniotic fluid interleukin 6 in preterm labor. Association with infection. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:1392–1400. doi: 10.1172/JCI114583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Romero R, Jimenez C, Lohda AK, Nores J, Hanaoka S, Avila C, Callahan R, Mazor M, Hobbins JC, Diamond MP. Amniotic fluid glucose concentration: a rapid and simple method for the detection of intraamniotic infection in preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:968–974. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91106-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Romero R, Quintero R, Nores J, Avila C, Mazor M, Hanaoka S, Hagay Z, Merchant L, Hobbins JC. Amniotic fluid white blood cell count: a rapid and simple test to diagnose microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and predict preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:821–830. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90423-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Baumann P, Romero R, Berry S, Gomez R, McFarlin B, Araneda H, Cotton DB, Fidel P. Evidence of participation of the soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor I in the host response to intrauterine infection in preterm labor. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1993;30:184–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1993.tb00619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cherouny PH, Pankuch GA, Romero R, Botti JJ, Kuhn DC, Demers LM, Appelbaum PC. Neutrophil attractant/activating peptide-1/interleukin-8: association with histologic chorioamnionitis, preterm delivery, and bioactive amniotic fluid leukoattractants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:1299–1303. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90297-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Romero R, Yoon BH, Kenney JS, Gomez R, Allison AC, Sehgal PB. Amniotic fluid interleukin-6 determinations are of diagnostic and prognostic value in preterm labor. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1993;30:167–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1993.tb00618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gomez R, Romero R, Galasso M, Behnke E, Insunza A, Cotton DB. The value of amniotic fluid interleukin-6, white blood cell count, and gram stain in the diagnosis of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients at term. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1994;32:200–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1994.tb01115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hsu CD, Meaddough E, Aversa K, Copel JA. The role of amniotic fluid L-selectin, GRO-alpha, and interleukin-8 in the pathogenesis of intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:428–432. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70414-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hsu CD, Meaddough E, Aversa K, Hong SF, Lu LC, Jones DC, Copel JA. Elevated amniotic fluid levels of leukemia inhibitory factor, interleukin 6, and interleukin 8 in intra-amniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1267–1270. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70144-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Maymon E, Romero R, Pacora P, Gervasi MT, Edwin SS, Gomez R, Seubert DE. Matrilysin (matrix metalloproteinase 7) in parturition, premature rupture of membranes, and intrauterine infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1545–1553. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.107652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Maymon E, Romero R, Pacora P, Gervasi MT, Gomez R, Edwin SS, Yoon BH. Evidence of in vivo differential bioavailability of the active forms of matrix metalloproteinases 9 and 2 in parturition, spontaneous rupture of membranes, and intra-amniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:887–894. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.108878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Maymon E, Romero R, Pacora P, Gomez R, Athayde N, Edwin S, Yoon BH. Human neutrophil collagenase (matrix metalloproteinase 8) in parturition, premature rupture of the membranes, and intrauterine infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:94–99. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.105344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pacora P, Maymon E, Gervasi MT, Gomez R, Edwin SS, Yoon BH, Romero R. Lactoferrin in intrauterine infection, human parturition, and rupture of fetal membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:904–910. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.108882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yoon BH, Romero R, Kim M, Kim EC, Kim T, Park JS, Jun JK. Clinical implications of detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum in the amniotic cavity with the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1130–1137. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.109036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hsu CD, Hong SF, Harirah H, Bahado-Singh R, Lu L. Amniotic fluid soluble fas levels in intra-amniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:667–670. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00664-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hsu CD, Aversa K, Meaddough E. The role of amniotic fluid interleukin-6, and cell adhesion molecules, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and leukocyte adhesion molecule-1, in intra-amniotic infection. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2000;43:251–254. doi: 10.1111/j.8755-8920.2000.430501.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Maymon E, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Berman S, Conoscenti G, Gomez R, Edwin S. Amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1149–1155. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yoon BH, Oh SY, Romero R, Shim SS, Han SY, Park JS, Jun JK. An elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 level at the time of mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis is a risk factor for spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1162–1167. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yoon BH, Romero R, Moon JB, Shim SS, Kim M, Kim G, Jun JK. Clinical significance of intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1130–1136. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Keelan JA, Yang J, Romero RJ, Chaiworapongsa T, Marvin KW, Sato TA, Mitchell MD. Epithelial cell-derived neutrophil-activating peptide-78 is present in fetal membranes and amniotic fluid at increased concentrations with intra-amniotic infection and preterm delivery. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:253–259. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.016204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Espinoza J, Goncalves LF, Romero R, Nien JK, Stites S, Kim YM, Hassan S, Gomez R, Yoon BH, Chaiworapongsa T, Lee W, Mazor M. The prevalence and clinical significance of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:346–352. doi: 10.1002/uog.1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, Romero R, Goncalves LF, Nien JK, Soto E, Khalek N, Camacho N, Hendler I, Mittal P, Friel LA, Gotsch F, Erez O, Than NG, Mazaki-Tovi S, Schoen ML, Hassan SS. Clinical significance of the presence of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:706–714. doi: 10.1002/uog.4081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lee SE, Romero R, Jung H, Park CW, Park JS, Yoon BH. The intensity of the fetal inflammatory response in intraamniotic inflammation with and without microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:294 e291–296. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Romero R, Espinoza J, Hassan S, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, Avila C, Erez O, Edwin S, Schmidt AM. Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE) in amniotic fluid: modulation by infection and inflammation. J Perinat Med. 2008;36:388–398. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Romero R, Espinoza J, Rogers WT, Moser A, Nien JK, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Erez O, Gomez R, Edwin S, Hassan SS. Proteomic analysis of amniotic fluid to identify women with preterm labor and intra-amniotic inflammation/infection: the use of a novel computational method to analyze mass spectrometric profiling. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:367–388. doi: 10.1080/14767050802045848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Romero R, Schaudinn C, Kusanovic JP, Gorur A, Gotsch F, Webster P, Nhan-Chang CL, Erez O, Kim CJ, Espinoza J, Goncalves LF, Vaisbuch E, Mazaki-Tovi S, Hassan SS, Costerton JW. Detection of a microbial biofilm in intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:135 e131–135. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Alpay Savasan Z, Xu Y, Hussein Y, Dong Z, Kusanovic JP, Kim CJ, Hassan SS. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in preterm labor with intact membranes and preterm PROM: a study of the alarmin HMGB1. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24:1444–1455. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.591460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gervasi MT, Romero R, Bracalente G, Erez O, Dong Z, Hassan SS, Yeo L, Yoon BH, Chaiworapongsa T. Midtrimester amniotic fluid concentrations of interleukin-6 and interferon-gamma-inducible protein-10: evidence for heterogeneity of intra-amniotic inflammation and associations with spontaneous early (<32 weeks) and late (>32 weeks) preterm delivery. J Perinat Med. 2012;40:329–343. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gervasi MT, Romero R, Bracalente G, Chaiworapongsa T, Erez O, Dong Z, Hassan SS, Yeo L, Yoon BH, Mor G, Barzon L, Franchin E, Militello V, Palu G. Viral invasion of the amniotic cavity (VIAC) in the midtrimester of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:2002–2013. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.683899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Gotsch F, Dong Z, Ahmed AI, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Kim CJ, Korzeniewski SJ, Yeo L. A novel molecular microbiologic technique for the rapid diagnosis of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic infection in preterm labor with intact membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;71:330–358. doi: 10.1111/aji.12189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Gotsch F, Dong Z, Ahmed AI, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Kim CJ, Korzeniewski SJ, Yeo L, Kim YM. Sterile intra-amniotic inflammation in asymptomatic patients with a sonographic short cervix: prevalence and clinical significance. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014:1–17. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.954243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, Korzeniewski SJ, Chaemsaithong P, Gotsch F, Dong Z, Ahmed AI, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Kim CJ, Yeo L. Prevalence and clinical significance of sterile intra-amniotic inflammation in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;72:458–474. doi: 10.1111/aji.12296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Romero R, Miranda J, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiworapongsa T, Kusanovic JP, Dong Z, Ahmed AI, Shaman M, Lannaman K, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Kim CJ, Korzeniewski SJ, Yeo L, Kim YM. Sterile and microbial-associated intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28:1394–1409. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.958463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Romero R, Miranda J, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Martinez A, Gotsch F, Dong Z, Ahmed AI, Shaman M, Lannaman K, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Kim CJ, Korzeniewski SJ, Yeo L, Kim YM. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term I: microbiology of the amniotic cavity using cultivation and molecular techniques. J Perinat Med. 2015;43:19–36. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chaemsaithong P, Romero R, Korzeniewski SJ, Martinez-Varea A, Dong Z, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Chaiworapongsa T, Yeo L. A point of care test for interleukin-6 in amniotic fluid in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: a step toward the early treatment of acute intra-amniotic inflammation/infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:360–367. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1006621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chaemsaithong P, Romero R, Korzeniewski SJ, Martinez-Varea A, Dong Z, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Chaiworapongsa T, Yeo L. A rapid interleukin-6 bedside test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm labor with intact membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:349–359. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1006620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Korzeniewski SJ, Kusanovic JP, Docheva N, Martinez-Varea A, Ahmed AI, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Chaiworapongsa T, Yeo L. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term III: how well do clinical criteria perform in the identification of proven intra-amniotic infection? J Perinat Med. 2016;44:23–32. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Korzeniewski SJ, Tarca AL, Bhatti G, Xu Z, Kusanovic JP, Dong Z, Docheva N, Martinez-Varea A, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Chaiworapongsa T, Yeo L. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term II: the intra-amniotic inflammatory response. J Perinat Med. 2016;44:5–22. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yoneda N, Yoneda S, Niimi H, Ueno T, Hayashi S, Ito M, Shiozaki A, Urushiyama D, Hata K, Suda W, Hattori M, Kigawa M, Kitajima I, Saito S. Polymicrobial Amniotic Fluid Infection with Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma and Other Bacteria Induces Severe Intra-Amniotic Inflammation Associated with Poor Perinatal Prognosis in Preterm Labor. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;75:112–125. doi: 10.1111/aji.12456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kim SM, Romero R, Lee J, Chaemsaithong P, Docheva N, Yoon BH. Gastric fluid versus amniotic fluid analysis for the identification of intra-amniotic infection due to Ureaplasma species. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:2579–2587. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1098614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Son GH, You YA, Kwon EJ, Lee KY, Kim YJ. Comparative Analysis of Midtrimester Amniotic Fluid Cytokine Levels to Predict Spontaneous Very Pre-term Birth in Patients with Cervical Insufficiency. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;75:155–161. doi: 10.1111/aji.12451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Maddipati KR, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Zhou SL, Xu Z, Tarca AL, Kusanovic JP, Gomez R, Chaiyasit N, Honn KV. Lipidomic analysis of patients with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity reveals up-regulation of leukotriene B4. FASEB J. 2016;30:3296–3307. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600583R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yoneda S, Shiozaki A, Yoneda N, Ito M, Shima T, Fukuda K, Ueno T, Niimi H, Kitajima I, Kigawa M, Saito S. Antibiotic Therapy Increases the Risk of Preterm Birth in Preterm Labor without Intra-Amniotic Microbes, but may Prolong the Gestation Period in Preterm Labor with Microbes, Evaluated by Rapid and High-Sensitive PCR System. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;75:440–450. doi: 10.1111/aji.12484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Park JY, Romero R, Lee J, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Yoon BH. An elevated amniotic fluid prostaglandin F2alpha concentration is associated with intra-amniotic inflammation/infection, and clinical and histologic chorioamnionitis, as well as impending preterm delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:2563–2572. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1094794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Docheva N, Dong Z, Kim CJ, Kim YM, Kim JS, Qureshi F, Jacques SM, Yoon BH, Chaiworapongsa T, Yeo L, Hassan SS, Erez O, Korzeniewski SJ. CXCL10 and IL-6: Markers of two different forms of intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm labor. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;78 doi: 10.1111/aji.12685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chaiyasit N, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Docheva N, Bhatti G, Kusanovic JP, Dong Z, Yeo L, Pacora P, Hassan SS, Erez O. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term VIII: a rapid MMP-8 test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation. J Perinat Med. 2017 doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Xu Y, Leng Y, Garcia-Flores V, Miller D, Jacques SM, Hassan SS, Faro J, Alsamsam A, Alhousseini A, Gomez-Roberts H, Panaitescu B, Yeo L, Maymon E. Are amniotic fluid neutrophils in women with intraamniotic infection and/or inflammation of fetal or maternal origin? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:693 e691–693 e616. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Xu Y, Miller D, Unkel R, Shaman M, Jacques SM, Panaitescu B, Garcia-Flores V, Hassan SS. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Amniotic Cavity of Women with Intra-Amniotic Infection: A New Mechanism of Host Defense. Reprod Sci. 2017;24:1139–1153. doi: 10.1177/1933719116678690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Martinez-Varea A, Romero R, Xu Y, Miller D, Ahmed AI, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Yeo L, Shaman M, Lannaman K, Cher B, Hassan SS, Gomez-Lopez N. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term VII: the amniotic fluid cellular immune response. J Perinat Med. 2017;45:523–538. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Maymon E, Romero R, Bhatti G, Chaemsaithong P, Gomez-Lopez N, Panaitescu B, Chaiyasit N, Pacora P, Dong Z, Hassan SS, Erez O. Chronic inflammatory lesions of the placenta are associated with an up-regulation of amniotic fluid CXCR3: A marker of allograft rejection. J Perinat Med. 2017 doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Musilova I, Andrys C, Krejsek J, Drahosova M, Zednikova B, Pliskova L, Zemlickova H, Jacobsson B, Kacerovsky M. Amniotic fluid pentraxins: Potential early markers for identifying intra-amniotic inflammatory complications in preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017 doi: 10.1111/aji.12789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Oh KJ, Kim SM, Hong JS, Maymon E, Erez O, Panaitescu B, Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Yoon BH. Twenty-four percent of patients with clinical chorioamnionitis in preterm gestations have no evidence of either culture-proven intraamniotic infection or intraamniotic inflammation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:604 e601–604 e611. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tarca AL, Fitzgerald W, Chaemsaithong P, Xu Z, Hassan SS, Grivel JC, Gomez-Lopez N, Panaitescu B, Pacora P, Maymon E, Erez O, Margolis L, Romero R. The cytokine network in women with an asymptomatic short cervix and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;78 doi: 10.1111/aji.12686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rowlands S, Danielewski JA, Tabrizi SN, Walker SP, Garland SM. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in midtrimester pregnancies using molecular microbiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:71 e71–71 e75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tong XL, Wang L, Gao TB, Qin YG, Qi YQ, Xu YP. Potential function of amniotic fluid in fetal development—novel insights by comparing the composition of human amniotic fluid with umbilical cord and maternal serum at mid and late gestation. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009;72:368–373. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70389-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Brace RA. Progress toward understanding the regulation of amniotic fluid volume: water and solute fluxes in and through the fetal membranes. Placenta. 1995;16:1–18. doi: 10.1016/0143-4004(95)90077-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Underwood MA, Gilbert WM, Sherman MP. Amniotic fluid: not just fetal urine anymore. J Perinatol. 2005;25:341–348. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wallenburg HC. The amniotic fluid I. Water and electrolyte homeostasis. J Perinat Med. 1977;5:193–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Brace RA. Physiology of amniotic fluid volume regulation. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;40:280–289. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199706000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ross MG, Brace RA, National Institute of Child H. Development Workshop P National Institute of Child Health and Development Conference summary: amniotic fluid biology–basic and clinical aspects. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001;10:2–19. doi: 10.1080/714904292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sozanskii AM. The biochemical composition of amniotic fluid and of maternal and fetal blood at various periods of pregnancy. Biull Eksp Biol Med. 1961;51:323–326. doi: 10.1007/BF00783508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rueda R, Vargas ML, Garcia-Pacheco M, Garcia-Olivares E. Detection of immunoregulatory lipid-like factors in human amniotic fluid. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1990;24:40–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1990.tb01036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Campbell J, Wathen N, Macintosh M, Cass P, Chard T, Mainwaring Burton R. Biochemical composition of amniotic fluid and extraembryonic coelomic fluid in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:563–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13821.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Romero R, Baumann P, Gonzalez R, Gomez R, Rittenhouse L, Behnke E, Mitchell MD. Amniotic fluid prostanoid concentrations increase early during the course of spontaneous labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1613–1620. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90412-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Romero R, Munoz H, Gomez R, Parra M, Polanco M, Valverde V, Hasbun J, Garrido J, Ghezzi F, Mazor M, Tolosa JE, Mitchell MD. Increase in prostaglandin bioavailability precedes the onset of human parturition. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1996;54:187–191. doi: 10.1016/s0952-3278(96)90015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Edwin SS, Romero RJ, Munoz H, Branch DW, Mitchell MD. 5-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid and human parturition. Prostaglandins. 1996;51:403–412. doi: 10.1016/0090-6980(96)00046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Petraglia F, Gomez R, Luisi S, Florio P, Tolosa JE, Stomati M, Romero R. Increased midtrimester amniotic fluid activin A: a risk factor for subsequent fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:194–197. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70174-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Drohse H, Christensen H, Myrhoj V, Sorensen S. Characterisation of non-maternal serum proteins in amniotic fluid at weeks 16 to 18 of gestation. Clin Chim Acta. 1998;276:109–120. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(98)00064-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Yoshio H, Tollin M, Gudmundsson GH, Lagercrantz H, Jornvall H, Marchini G, Agerberth B. Antimicrobial polypeptides of human vernix caseosa and amniotic fluid: implications for newborn innate defense. Pediatr Res. 2003;53:211–216. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000047471.47777.B0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Edwin S, Rathnasabapathy C, Gomez R, Bujold E, Camacho N, Kim YM, Hassan S, Blackwell S, Whitty J, Berman S, Redman M, Yoon BH, Sorokin Y. Antimicrobial peptides in amniotic fluid: defensins, calprotectin and bacterial/permeability-increasing protein in patients with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, intra-amniotic inflammation, preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;13:2–21. doi: 10.1080/jmf.13.1.2.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Akinbi HT, Narendran V, Pass AK, Markart P, Hoath SB. Host defense proteins in vernix caseosa and amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:2090–2096. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Cho CK, Shan SJ, Winsor EJ, Diamandis EP. Proteomics analysis of human amniotic fluid. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007;6:1406–1415. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700090-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Bujold E, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Erez O, Gotsch F, Chaiworapongsa T, Gomez R, Espinoza J, Vaisbuch E, Mee Kim Y, Edwin S, Pisano M, Allen B, Podust VN, Dalmasso EA, Rutherford J, Rogers W, Moser A, Yoon BH, Barder T. Proteomic profiling of amniotic fluid in preterm labor using two-dimensional liquid separation and mass spectrometry. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:697–713. doi: 10.1080/14767050802053289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Lee SE, Romero R, Park IS, Seong HS, Park CW, Yoon BH. Amniotic fluid prostaglandin concentrations increase before the onset of spontaneous labor at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:89–94. doi: 10.1080/14767050701830514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Perluigi M, Di Domenico F, Cini C, Coccia R, Giorlandino FR, Giorlandino M, Cignini P, Mesoraca A, Giorlandino C. Proteomic analysis for the study of amniotic fluid protein composition. J Prenat Med. 2009;3:39–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Romero R, Mazaki-Tovi S, Vaisbuch E, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Gomez R, Nien JK, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Luo J, Banks D, Ryals J, Beecher C. Metabolomics in premature labor: a novel approach to identify patients at risk for preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:1344–1359. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.482618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Witkin SS, Chervenak J, Bongiovanni AM, Herway C, Linhares IM, Skupski D. Influence of mid-trimester amniotic fluid on endogenous and lipopolysaccharide-mediated responses of mononuclear lymphoid cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;67:28–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Maddipati KR, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Zhou SL, Xu Z, Tarca AL, Kusanovic JP, Munoz H, Honn KV. Eicosanomic profiling reveals dominance of the epoxygenase pathway in human amniotic fluid at term in spontaneous labor. FASEB J. 2014;28:4835–4846. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-254383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Maddipati KR, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Zhou SL, Xu Z, Tarca AL, Kusanovic JP, Gomez R, Docheva N, Honn KV. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term: the amniotic fluid fatty acyl lipidome. J Lipid Res. 2016;57:1906–1916. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P069096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Galask RP, Snyder IS. Antimicrobial factors in amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970;106:59–65. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(70)90126-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Larsen B, Snyder IS, Galask RP. Bacterial growth inhibition by amniotic fluid. I. In vitro evidence for bacterial growth-inhibiting activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974;119:492–496. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(74)90207-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Schlievert P, Johnson W, Galask RP. Isolation of a low-molecular-weight antibacterial system from human amniotic fluid. Infect Immun. 1976;14:1156–1166. doi: 10.1128/iai.14.5.1156-1166.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Schlievert P, Johnson W, Galask RP. Amniotic fluid antibacterial mechanisms: newer concepts. Semin Perinatol. 1977;1:59–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Tafari N, Ross SM, Naeye RL, Galask RP, Zaar B. Failure of bacterial growth inhibition by amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;128:187–189. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90685-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Niemela A, Kulomaa M, Vija P, Tuohimaa P, Saarikoski S. Lactoferrin in human amniotic fluid. Hum Reprod. 1989;4:99–101. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Pierce J, Jacobson P, Benedetti E, Peterson E, Phibbs J, Preslar A, Reems JA. Collection and characterization of amniotic fluid from scheduled C-section deliveries. Cell Tissue Bank. 2016;17:413–425. doi: 10.1007/s10561-016-9572-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Votta RA, de Gagneten CB, Parada O, Giulietti M. Cytologic study of amniotic fluid in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968;102:571–577. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(68)90540-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Wachtel E, Gordon H, Olsen E. Cytology of amniotic fluid. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969;76:596–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1969.tb06145.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Pasquinucci C, Dambrosio F, Meroni P, Della Torre L. The amniotic fluid. 3. A morphologic study of cytology. Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat. 1969;91:90–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Casadei R, D’Ablaing G, 3rd, Kaplan BJ, Schwinn CP. A cytologic study of amniotic fluid. Acta Cytol. 1973;17:289–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Cutz E, Conen PE. Macrophages and epithelial cells in human amniotic fluid: transmission and scanning electron microscopic study. Am J Anat. 1978;151:87–101. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001510108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Schrage R, Bogelspacher HR, Wurster KG. Amniotic fluid cells in the second trimester of pregnancy. Acta Cytol. 1982;26:407–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Gosden CM. Amniotic fluid cell types and culture. Br Med Bull. 1983;39:348–354. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Fauza D. Amniotic fluid and placental stem cells. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;18:877–891. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Lynch W, Rezai S, Henderson CE. Human amniotic fluid: a source of stem cells for possible therapeutic use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:401. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Hoyes AD. Ultrastructure of the cells of the amniotic fluid. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1968;75:164–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1968.tb02027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Sutherland GR, Bauld R, Bain AD. Observations on human amniotic fluid cell strains in serial culture. J Med Genet. 1974;11:190–195. doi: 10.1136/jmg.11.2.190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Medina-Gomez P, McBride WH. Amniotic fluid macrophages from normal and malformed fetuses. Prenat Diagn. 1986;6:195–205. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970060306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Marquardt N, Ivarsson MA, Sundstrom E, Akesson E, Martini E, Eidsmo L, Mjosberg J, Friberg D, Kublickas M, Ek S, Tegerstedt G, Seiger A, Westgren M, Michaelsson J. Fetal CD103+ IL-17-Producing Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells Represent the Dominant Lymphocyte Subset in Human Amniotic Fluid. J Immunol. 2016;197:3069–3075. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Sutherland GR, Brock DJ, Scrimgeour JB. Letter: Amniotic-fluid macrophages and anencephaly. Lancet. 1973;2:1098–1099. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)92720-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Sutherland GR, Brock DJ, Scrimgeour JB. Amniotic fluid macrophages and the antenatal diagnosis of anencephaly and spina bifida. J Med Genet. 1975;12:135–137. doi: 10.1136/jmg.12.2.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Gosden C, Brock DJ. Combined use of alphafetoprotein and amniotic fluid cell morphology in early prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. J Med Genet. 1978;15:262–270. doi: 10.1136/jmg.15.4.262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Papp Z, Bell JE. Uncultured cells in amniotic fluid from normal and abnormal foetuses. Clin Genet. 1979;16:282–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1979.tb01001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Chapman PA, Blenkinsopp WK, Lewis BV. The detection of neural tube closure defects by exfoliative cytology of amniotic fluid. Acta Cytol. 1981;25:367–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Chapman PA. Cytology as a means of detecting neural tube defects. Med Lab Sci. 1982;39:215–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Morrison JJ, Klein N, Chitty LS, Kocjan G, Walshe D, Goulding M, Geary MP, Pierro A, Rodeck CH. Intra-amniotic inflammation in human gastroschisis: possible aetiology of postnatal bowel dysfunction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:1200–1204. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09975.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Guibourdenche J, Berrebi D, Vuillard E, de Lagausie P, Aigrain Y, Oury JF, Luton D. Biochemical investigations of bowel inflammation in gastroschisis. Pediatr Res. 2006;60:565–568. doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000242344.22638.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Frascoli M, Jeanty C, Fleck S, Moradi PW, Keating S, Mattis AN, Tang Q, MacKenzie TC. Heightened Immune Activation in Fetuses with Gastroschisis May Be Blocked by Targeting IL-5. J Immunol. 2016;196:4957–4966. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Romero R, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Gomez R, Diamond MP, Kenney JS, Ramirez M, Fidel PL, Sorokin Y, Cotton D, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of amniotic fluid white blood cell count, glucose, interleukin-6, and gram stain in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:805–816. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Romero R, Yoon BH, Mazor M, Gomez R, Gonzalez R, Diamond MP, Baumann P, Araneda H, Kenney JS, Cotton DB, et al. A comparative study of the diagnostic performance of amniotic fluid glucose, white blood cell count, interleukin-6, and gram stain in the detection of microbial invasion in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:839–851. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90014-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Yoon BH, Yang SH, Jun JK, Park KH, Kim CJ, Romero R. Maternal blood C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, and temperature in preterm labor: a comparison with amniotic fluid white blood cell count. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:231–237. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00380-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Garcia-Flores V, Xu Y, Leng Y, Alhousseini A, Hassan SS, Panaitescu B. Amniotic fluid neutrophils can phagocytize bacteria: A mechanism for microbial killing in the amniotic cavity. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;78 doi: 10.1111/aji.12723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Kim MJ, Romero R, Gervasi MT, Kim JS, Yoo W, Lee DC, Mittal P, Erez O, Kusanovic JP, Hassan SS, Kim CJ. Widespread microbial invasion of the chorioamniotic membranes is a consequence and not a cause of intra-amniotic infection. Lab Invest. 2009;89:924–936. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Mjosberg JM, Trifari S, Crellin NK, Peters CP, van Drunen CM, Piet B, Fokkens WJ, Cupedo T, Spits H. Human IL-25- and IL-33-responsive type 2 innate lymphoid cells are defined by expression of CRTH2 and CD161. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:1055–1062. doi: 10.1038/ni.2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Forsberg A, Bengtsson M, Eringfalt A, Ernerudh J, Mjosberg J, Jenmalm MC. GATA binding protein 3(+) group 2 innate lymphoid cells are present in cord blood and in higher proportions in male than in female neonates. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:228–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Mebius RE, Miyamoto T, Christensen J, Domen J, Cupedo T, Weissman IL, Akashi K. The fetal liver counterpart of adult common lymphoid progenitors gives rise to all lymphoid lineages, CD45+CD4+CD3- cells, as well as macrophages. J Immunol. 2001;166:6593–6601. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.11.6593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Sawa S, Cherrier M, Lochner M, Satoh-Takayama N, Fehling HJ, Langa F, Di Santo JP, Eberl G. Lineage relationship analysis of RORgammat+ innate lymphoid cells. Science. 2010;330:665–669. doi: 10.1126/science.1194597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Possot C, Schmutz S, Chea S, Boucontet L, Louise A, Cumano A, Golub R. Notch signaling is necessary for adult, but not fetal, development of RORgammat(+) innate lymphoid cells. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:949–958. doi: 10.1038/ni.2105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Bando JK, Liang HE, Locksley RM. Identification and distribution of developing innate lymphoid cells in the fetal mouse intestine. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:153–160. doi: 10.1038/ni.3057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Klose CS, Kiss EA, Schwierzeck V, Ebert K, Hoyler T, d’Hargues Y, Goppert N, Croxford AL, Waisman A, Tanriver Y, Diefenbach A. A T-bet gradient controls the fate and function of CCR6-RORgammat+ innate lymphoid cells. Nature. 2013;494:261–265. doi: 10.1038/nature11813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Haynes BF, Heinly CS. Early human T cell development: analysis of the human thymus at the time of initial entry of hematopoietic stem cells into the fetal thymic microenvironment. J Exp Med. 1995;181:1445–1458. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.4.1445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Spencer J, MacDonald TT, Finn T, Isaacson PG. The development of gut associated lymphoid tissue in the terminal ileum of fetal human intestine. Clin Exp Immunol. 1986;64:536–543. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Cupedo T, Nagasawa M, Weijer K, Blom B, Spits H. Development and activation of regulatory T cells in the human fetus. Eur J Immunol. 2005;35:383–390. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Michaelsson J, Mold JE, McCune JM, Nixon DF. Regulation of T cell responses in the developing human fetus. J Immunol. 2006;176:5741–5748. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.5741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Mold JE, Michaelsson J, Burt TD, Muench MO, Beckerman KP, Busch MP, Lee TH, Nixon DF, McCune JM. Maternal alloantigens promote the development of tolerogenic fetal regulatory T cells in utero. Science. 2008;322:1562–1565. doi: 10.1126/science.1164511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Mold JE, McCune JM. Immunological tolerance during fetal development: from mouse to man. Adv Immunol. 2012;115:73–111. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394299-9.00003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Rito DC, Viehl LT, Buchanan PM, Haridas S, Koenig JM. Augmented Th17-type immune responses in preterm neonates exposed to histologic chorioamnionitis. Pediatr Res. 2017;81:639–645. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Ivanov II, McKenzie BS, Zhou L, Tadokoro CE, Lepelley A, Lafaille JJ, Cua DJ, Littman DR. The orphan nuclear receptor RORgammat directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells. Cell. 2006;126:1121–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Crome SQ, Wang AY, Levings MK. Translational mini-review series on Th17 cells: function and regulation of human T helper 17 cells in health and disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;159:109–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04037.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Yang BH, Hagemann S, Mamareli P, Lauer U, Hoffmann U, Beckstette M, Fohse L, Prinz I, Pezoldt J, Suerbaum S, Sparwasser T, Hamann A, Floess S, Huehn J, Lochner M. Foxp3(+) T cells expressing RORgammat represent a stable regulatory T-cell effector lineage with enhanced suppressive capacity during intestinal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9:444–457. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Solvason N, Kearney JF. The human fetal omentum: a site of B cell generation. J Exp Med. 1992;175:397–404. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.2.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Antin JH, Emerson SG, Martin P, Gadol N, Ault KA. Leu-1+ (CD5+) B cells. A major lymphoid subpopulation in human fetal spleen: phenotypic and functional studies. J Immunol. 1986;136:505–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Hardy RR, Hayakawa K. CD5 B cells, a fetal B cell lineage. Adv Immunol. 1994;55:297–339. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60512-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Bhat NM, Kantor AB, Bieber MM, Stall AM, Herzenberg LA, Teng NN. The ontogeny and functional characteristics of human B-1 (CD5+ B) cells. Int Immunol. 1992;4:243–252. doi: 10.1093/intimm/4.2.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Masmoudi H, Mota-Santos T, Huetz F, Coutinho A, Cazenave PA. All T15 Id-positive antibodies (but not the majority of VHT15+ antibodies) are produced by peritoneal CD5+ B lymphocytes. Int Immunol. 1990;2:515–520. doi: 10.1093/intimm/2.6.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Baumgarth N, Herman OC, Jager GC, Brown LE, Herzenberg LA, Chen J. B-1 and B-2 cell-derived immunoglobulin M antibodies are nonredundant components of the protective response to influenza virus infection. J Exp Med. 2000;192:271–280. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.2.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Martin F, Oliver AM, Kearney JF. Marginal zone and B1 B cells unite in the early response against T-independent blood-borne particulate antigens. Immunity. 2001;14:617–629. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00129-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Hardy RR. B-1 B cell development. J Immunol. 2006;177:2749–2754. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.2749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Phillips JH, Hori T, Nagler A, Bhat N, Spits H, Lanier LL. Ontogeny of human natural killer (NK) cells: fetal NK cells mediate cytolytic function and express cytoplasmic CD3 epsilon, delta proteins. J Exp Med. 1992;175:1055–1066. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.4.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Ivarsson MA, Loh L, Marquardt N, Kekalainen E, Berglin L, Bjorkstrom NK, Westgren M, Nixon DF, Michaelsson J. Differentiation and functional regulation of human fetal NK cells. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:3889–3901. doi: 10.1172/JCI68989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Mor G, Aldo P, Alvero AB. The unique immunological and microbial aspects of pregnancy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17:469–482. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Hu XH, Tang MX, Mor G, Liao AH. Tim-3: Expression on immune cells and roles at the maternal-fetal interface. J Reprod Immunol. 2016;118:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2016.10.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Romero R, Ceska M, Avila C, Mazor M, Behnke E, Lindley I. Neutrophil attractant/activating peptide-1/interleukin-8 in term and preterm parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:813–820. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90422-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, Gotsch F, Nhan-Chang CL, Erez O, Kim CJ, Khalek N, Mittal P, Goncalves LF, Schaudinn C, Hassan SS, Costerton JW. What is amniotic fluid ‘sludge’? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:793–798. doi: 10.1002/uog.5173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Maymon E, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Kim JC, Berman S, Gomez R, Edwin S. Value of amniotic fluid neutrophil collagenase concentrations in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1143–1148. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Helmig BR, Romero R, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Bujold E, Gomez R, Ohlsson K, Uldbjerg N. Neutrophil elastase and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor in prelabor rupture of membranes, parturition and intra-amniotic infection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12:237–246. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.4.237.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Gravett MG, Novy MJ, Rosenfeld RG, Reddy AP, Jacob T, Turner M, McCormack A, Lapidus JA, Hitti J, Eschenbach DA, Roberts CT, Jr, Nagalla SR. Diagnosis of intra-amniotic infection by proteomic profiling and identification of novel biomarkers. JAMA. 2004;292:462–469. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.4.462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Soto E, Espinoza J, Nien JK, Kusanovic JP, Erez O, Richani K, Santolaya-Forgas J, Romero R. Human beta-defensin-2: a natural antimicrobial peptide present in amniotic fluid participates in the host response to microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:15–22. doi: 10.1080/14767050601036212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Ginhoux F, Jung S. Monocytes and macrophages: developmental pathways and tissue homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:392–404. doi: 10.1038/nri3671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Gomez Perdiguero E, Klapproth K, Schulz C, Busch K, Azzoni E, Crozet L, Garner H, Trouillet C, de Bruijn MF, Geissmann F, Rodewald HR. Tissue-resident macrophages originate from yolk-sac-derived erythro-myeloid progenitors. Nature. 2015;518:547–551. doi: 10.1038/nature13989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Hoeffel G, Chen J, Lavin Y, Low D, Almeida FF, See P, Beaudin AE, Lum J, Low I, Forsberg EC, Poidinger M, Zolezzi F, Larbi A, Ng LG, Chan JK, Greter M, Becher B, Samokhvalov IM, Merad M, Ginhoux F. C-Myb(+) erythro-myeloid progenitor-derived fetal monocytes give rise to adult tissue-resident macrophages. Immunity. 2015;42:665–678. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Hashimoto D, Chow A, Noizat C, Teo P, Beasley MB, Leboeuf M, Becker CD, See P, Price J, Lucas D, Greter M, Mortha A, Boyer SW, Forsberg EC, Tanaka M, van Rooijen N, Garcia-Sastre A, Stanley ER, Ginhoux F, Frenette PS, Merad M. Tissue-resident macrophages self-maintain locally throughout adult life with minimal contribution from circulating monocytes. Immunity. 2013;38:792–804. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Wynn RM. Derivation and ultrastructure of the so-called Hofbauer cell. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967;97:235–248. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(67)90546-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Kim JS, Romero R, Kim MR, Kim YM, Friel L, Espinoza J, Kim CJ. Involvement of Hofbauer cells and maternal T cells in villitis of unknown aetiology. Histopathology. 2008;52:457–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.02964.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Simoni MK, Jurado KA, Abrahams VM, Fikrig E, Guller S. Zika virus infection of Hofbauer cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;77 doi: 10.1111/aji.12613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Romero R, Brody DT, Oyarzun E, Mazor M, Wu YK, Hobbins JC, Durum SK. Infection and labor. III. Interleukin-1: a signal for the onset of parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:1117–1123. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90172-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Romero R, Parvizi ST, Oyarzun E, Mazor M, Wu YK, Avila C, Athanassiadis AP, Mitchell MD. Amniotic fluid interleukin-1 in spontaneous labor at term. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:235–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Romero R, Mazor M, Brandt F, Sepulveda W, Avila C, Cotton DB, Dinarello CA. Interleukin-1 alpha and interleukin-1 beta in preterm and term human parturition. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1992;27:117–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1992.tb00737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Hillier SL, Witkin SS, Krohn MA, Watts DH, Kiviat NB, Eschenbach DA. The relationship of amniotic fluid cytokines and preterm delivery, amniotic fluid infection, histologic chorioamnionitis, and chorioamnion infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:941–948. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Gomez R, Ghezzi F, Romero R, Munoz H, Tolosa JE, Rojas I. Premature labor and intra-amniotic infection. Clinical aspects and role of the cytokines in diagnosis and pathophysiology. Clin Perinatol. 1995;22:281–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Yoon BH, Romero R, Jun JK, Park KH, Park JD, Ghezzi F, Kim BI. Amniotic fluid cytokines (interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1 beta, and interleukin-8) and the risk for the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:825–830. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70276-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Gonzalez-Bosquet E, Cerqueira MJ, Dominguez C, Gasser I, Bermejo B, Cabero L. Amniotic fluid glucose and cytokines values in the early diagnosis of amniotic infection in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. J Matern Fetal Med. 1999;8:155–158. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199907/08)8:4<155::AID-MFM3>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Figueroa R, Garry D, Elimian A, Patel K, Sehgal PB, Tejani N. Evaluation of amniotic fluid cytokines in preterm labor and intact membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18:241–247. doi: 10.1080/13506120500223241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Sadowsky DW, Adams KM, Gravett MG, Witkin SS, Novy MJ. Preterm labor is induced by intraamniotic infusions of interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha but not by interleukin-6 or interleukin-8 in a nonhuman primate model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1578–1589. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Marconi C, de Andrade Ramos BR, Peracoli JC, Donders GG, da Silva MG. Amniotic fluid interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-6, but not interleukin-8 correlate with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in preterm labor. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;65:549–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.