Skip to main content
The Journal of General Virology logoLink to The Journal of General Virology
. 2014 May 1;95(Pt 5):1055–1066. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.061309-0

Genomic and phylogenetic characterization of viruses included in the Manzanilla and Oropouche species complexes of the genus Orthobunyavirus, family Bunyaviridae

Jason T Ladner 1,, Nazir Savji 2,†,, Loreen Lofts 1, Amelia Travassos da Rosa 3, Michael R Wiley 1, Marie C Gestole 1, Gail E Rosen 2, Hilda Guzman 3, Pedro F C Vasconcelos 4, Marcio R T Nunes 5, Tadeusz J Kochel 6,§, W Ian Lipkin 2, Robert B Tesh 3, Gustavo Palacios 1,
PMCID: PMC5974287  PMID: 24558222

Abstract

A thorough characterization of the genetic diversity of viruses present in vector and vertebrate host populations is essential for the early detection of and response to emerging pathogenic viruses, yet genetic characterization of many important viral groups remains incomplete. The Simbu serogroup of the genus Orthobunyavirus, family Bunyaviridae, is an example. The Simbu serogroup currently consists of a highly diverse group of related arboviruses that infect both humans and economically important livestock species. Here, we report complete genome sequences for 11 viruses within this group, with a focus on the large and poorly characterized Manzanilla and Oropouche species complexes. Phylogenetic and pairwise divergence analyses indicated the presence of high levels of genetic diversity within these two species complexes, on a par with that seen among the five other species complexes in the Simbu serogroup. Based on previously reported divergence thresholds between species, the data suggested that these two complexes should actually be divided into at least five species. Together these five species formed a distinct phylogenetic clade apart from the rest of the Simbu serogroup. Pairwise sequence divergences among viruses of this clade and viruses in other Simbu serogroup species complexes were similar to levels of divergence among the other orthobunyavirus serogroups. The genetic data also suggested relatively high levels of natural reassortment, with three potential reassortment events present, including two well-supported events involving viruses known to infect humans.

Introduction

Globalization of travel and trade, climate change and ever-growing human population sizes are all contributing to an increase in the emergence of pathogenic viruses (Lipkin, 2013). Many of these viruses are coming from well-characterized and expected groups (e.g. influenza, flaviviruses), whereas others belong to groups that have largely been ignored by past surveillance programmes. An example of the latter are members of the genus Phlebovirus, which, with the notable exceptions of Rift Valley fever and Toscana viruses, were generally thought to be of little current public health importance until the recent emergence of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) and Heartland virus (HRTV) (McMullan et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2011). Another, even larger, neglected group is the orthobunyaviruses. Due to their abundance and diversity, many orthobunyaviruses have yet to be fully sequenced and there are probably many others that have yet to be detected. However, a thorough understanding of the sequence diversity of such circulating viruses is a critical part of surveillance and preparedness for future disease outbreaks.

The genus Orthobunyavirus is the largest in the family Bunyaviridae with over 170 named viruses corresponding to 18 different serogroups and 48 species complexes (Elliott & Blakqori, 2011; Nichol et al., 2005). Although the term ‘serogroup’ is not currently utilized by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), the concept of serogroups has played an important historical role in viral taxonomy (Calisher & Karabatsos, 1988); the classification of arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) was initially based on antigenic relationships revealed by serological tests (Casals, 1957). In general, genetic-based classifications are starting to supplant antigenic classifications; however, due to the lack of genetic information for many named viruses in the family Bunyaviridae, most current taxonomic assignments are still based on serological criteria (Nichol et al., 2005; Plyusnin et al., 2012). Thus, in this report, in the interests of continuity and clarity, the term ‘serogroup’ will continue to be used for a group of serologically related viruses and the term ‘species complex’ will be used for ICTV-defined (Nichol et al., 2005) groups of closely related, differently named viruses whose exact taxonomic status remains uncertain because of slight antigenic variation or differences in host range, vector species, geographical distribution and/or pathogenic potential from the designated type species. The purpose of the present report was to explore genetic diversity within the Simbu serogroup of the genus Orthobunyavirus, a diverse and geographically widespread group that includes important human and livestock pathogens (Kinney & Calisher, 1981; Saeed et al., 2001a).

The Simbu serogroup currently comprises 22 officially recognized viruses that have been grouped into seven different species complexes (Akabane, Manzanilla, Oropouche, Sathuperi, Simbu, Shamonda and Shuni; Nichol et al., 2005), as well as several other recently described viruses that have yet to be officially assigned to a species (Aguilar et al., 2011; Figueiredo & Da Rosa, 1988; Goller et al., 2012; Plyusnin et al., 2012; Saeed et al., 2001b). Full genomes have recently been obtained for 12 viruses within the Simbu serogroup (Goller et al., 2012); however, these genome sequences are not equally distributed among the seven species complexes. For example, only one representative, Oropouche virus (OROV), has been fully sequenced from the Oropouche species complex, and no complete sequences are available from the Manzanilla species complex (Kinney & Calisher, 1981). Yet, these are two of the largest species complexes within the Simbu serogroup, and the Oropouche species complex is the only one with members that are known to cause human disease. The lack of complete genomes for all members of these species complexes impacts diagnostic capacity (e.g. the ability to identify conserved/divergent regions for primer design in PCR applications and for recognition with sequence-based diagnostic methods); it also prevents the recognition of reassortants.

Here, we utilized high-throughput sequencing technologies to improve our understanding of the diversity and evolutionary history of these two species complexes by obtaining full genome sequences for 11 previously uncharacterized viruses, including the three remaining members of the Oropouche species complex, four of the five members of the Manzanilla species complex and four other unassigned viruses that have demonstrated genetic and/or antigenic similarities to one of these two species complexes. In order to compare the sequences with previous taxonomic characterizations, serological comparisons were conducted among these 11 uncharacterized viruses and the other fully sequenced members of these two species complexes.

Results and Discussion

Genome sequences

Genome sequences for 11 viruses (Table 1) were obtained through de novo assembly from either 454 (Roche) or Illumina sequences. Each sequenced orthobunyavirus genome consisted of three distinct RNA segments, and the sizes and organization of the ORFs were generally consistent with what has been described previously for the genus (Plyusnin et al., 2012) (Table S1, available in the online Supplementary Material). The 3′ terminal sequence was obtained for 18 segments (nine different viruses) and the 5′ terminal sequence was obtained for seven segments (five different viruses). In all cases, the 10 most terminal nucleotides were identical to those that have been reported previously for the genus (Plyusnin et al., 2012). Segments without sufficient coverage to assemble the ends were completed using primers targeting these conserved terminal sequences. The large (L) genome segment of members of the genus Orthobunyavirus contains a single ORF that encodes an RNA polymerase; in our sequences, this ORF ranged in size from 6756 to 6783 bases. The medium-sized (M) segment also contains a single ORF, which encodes a polyprotein that is co-translationally cleaved into two envelope glycoproteins and a non-structural protein. The M-segment ORF of the 11 viruses ranged in size from 4254 to 4299 bases. The smallest (S) segment typically contains two overlapping ORFs, which code for a nucleocapsid protein (NP) and a non-structural (NSs) protein. The NP ORF of the 11 viruses ranged in size from 693 to 699 bases, whilst the NSs protein ORF ranged from 273 to 288 bases, with two exceptions: Utinga (UTIV) and Utive (UVV) both contained severely truncated, presumably non-functional, versions of the NSs protein ORF due to multiple nonsense mutations (81 bases, 27 aa). When functional, the NSs proteins of orthobunyaviruses have been shown to act as IFN antagonists (Elliott & Weber, 2009), and therefore it is reasonable to suggest that loss of the NSs protein in UTIV and UVV may have altered the virulence of these viruses. Similar loss of the NSs protein has been reported in several other orthobunyavirus serogroups, including Anopheles A and B, Tete and Wyeomyia (Chowdhary et al., 2012; Mohamed et al., 2009); however, to our knowledge, this is the first description of a single serogroup with both members that contain and members that lack a NSs protein.

Table 1. Virus isolates sequenced in this study.

Virus Strain Source Locality Year Species* GenBank accession nos Reference
MANV TRVL 3587 Alouatta seniculus (red howler monkey) Trinidad 1954 Manzanilla KF697148–KF697150 Anderson et al. (1960)
INGV SA An 4165 Hyphanturgus ocularis (spectacled weaver) South Africa 1959 Manzanilla KF697139–KF697141 McIntosh et al. (1965)
MERV AV 782 Progne subis (purple martin) USA 1964 Manzanilla KF697151–KF697153 Calisher et al. (1969)
Cat Que virus† VN 04-2108 Culex sp. (mosquitoes) Vietnam 2004 Manzanilla JQ675598–JQ675600 Bryant et al. (2005)
BUTV BFS 5002 Culicoides sp. (biting midges) USA 1964 Buttonwillow KF697160–KF697162 Reeves et al. (1970)
FPV Aus Ch 16129 Mosquitoes Australia 1974 Facey’s Paddock KF697136–KF697138 Doherty et al. (1979)
UTIV Be An 84785 Bradypus tridactylus (pale-throated sloth) Brazil 1965 Utinga KF697154–KF697156 Shope et al. (1967)
UVV Pan An 48878 Bradypus variegates (brown-throated sloth) Panama 1975 Utinga KF697157–KF697159 Seymour et al. (1983)
JATV BeAn 423380 Nasua nasua (South American coati) Brazil 1984 Oropouche JQ675601–JQ675603 Figueiredo & Da Rosa (1988)
IQTV IQT9924 Homo sapiens (human) Peru 1999 Oropouche KF697142–KF697144 Aguilar et al. (2011)
Madre de Dios‡ FMD1303 Homo sapiens (human) Peru 2007 Oropouche KF697145–KF697147 na

MANV, Manzanilla virus; INGV, Ingwavuma virus; MERV, Mermet virus; BUTV, Buttonwillow virus; FPV, Facey’s Paddock virus; UTIV, Utinga virus; UVV, Utive virus; JATV, Jatobal virus; IQTV, Iquitos virus.

*

Species designations are based on the genetic data presented in this paper.

Previously described as an isolate of OYAV. ‘Cat Que virus’ is an unofficial name proposed here to refer to isolate VN 04-2108.

‘Madre de Dios virus’ is an unofficial name proposed here to refer to isolate FMD1303.

na, Not applicable.

Genus-level phylogenetic relationships

Phylogenetic analyses of the three genome segments confirmed that the 11 sequenced viruses were all genetically closely related to the previously sequenced Simbu serogroup viruses. The Simbu serogroup formed a monophyletic clade in both the M- and S-segment trees (bootstraps = 66.9 and 100, respectively; Figs S1 and S2), and in the L-segment tree the serogroup was paraphyletic, also including Leanyer virus (LEAV; Fig. 1) (Savji et al., 2011). Uncertainty in placing LEAV was the main reason for a low bootstrap in the M-segment tree; without LEAV, the Simbu serogroup clade was supported in 90 % of bootstrap analyses. Our extended genetic sampling of the Oropouche and Manzanilla species complexes illuminated a deep evolutionary divide within the Simbu serogroup; one phylogenetic clade (clade A) included the Manzanilla and Oropouche species complexes and a second clade (clade B) included the other five Simbu species complexes (Figs 1, S1 and S2) (Kinney & Calisher, 1981). These monophyletic clades were well supported across all three genomic segments with bootstrap support ranging from 97.5 to 100 %, and there was no evidence of reassortment between these clades.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Phylogenetic tree of members of the genus Orthobunyavirus based on the protein-coding portion of the L segment. The tree was built using translated amino acid sequences in mega v5.1 (Tamura et al., 2011) using the neighbour-joining algorithm and a p-distance matrix. The tree is unrooted and the node labels represent percentage bootstrap support values after 1000 resampling events. Filled circles indicate the genomes that were sequenced in this study. Species designations (left brackets) are based on the genetic data presented in this paper. Clade labels on the far right correspond to serogroups.

In 1981, Kinney and Calisher used a combination of serological analyses to provide finer levels of classification within the Simbu serogroup (Kinney & Calisher, 1981); the two genetic clades seen in our analysis are consistent with the serocomplexes they identified. Clade B corresponds completely to their original Simbu serocomplex, whereas the Oropouche and Manzanilla species complexes (clade A) each correspond to unique serocomplexes. Pairwise genetic similarities at the amino acid level between clades A and B ranged from 56.6 to 61.5 %, 32.4 to 39 % and 59.7 to 71.9 % for the L, M and S segments, respectively, whilst similarities within the clades ranged from 65.9 to 99.7 %, 34.4 to 89.1 % and 69.8 to 100 %, respectively (Fig. 2). In our previous evaluation of LEAV (Savji et al., 2011), minimum percentage amino acid similarities were proposed as criteria for inclusion of viruses within the same group, where the term ‘group’ refers to the taxonomic division currently occupied by serogroups. Clear distinctions were found between intra- and intergroup genetic similarities at the L and S segments, and cut-offs of 59 and 60 %, respectively, were proposed (Savji et al., 2011). With currently available data, we saw similarly clear distinctions in comparisons of L-segment sequences, even when Simbu serogroup clades A and B were treated separately. In fact, ~77 % (92/120) of the pairwise comparisons between these two clades fell at or below the proposed 59 % similarity cut-off, and 90.8 % (109/120) of the pairwise comparisons were below a similarity cut-off of 60 %, whilst all intraclade comparisons were well above these cut-offs. In general, we found levels of intra- and interserogroup genetic similarity to be less distinct when comparing the S segments, and no pairwise comparisons between clades A and B met the previously proposed cut-off for different serogroups. However, 76.9 % (120/156) of pairwise comparisons between clades A and B exhibited <69 % similarity, whilst all comparisons within the two clades were above this threshold. Furthermore, this degree of S segment similarity was on a par with pairwise comparisons between members of the Wyeomyia and Bunyamwera serogroups (Fig. 2); the former was not included in our previous analysis (Savji et al., 2011). Therefore, we argue that the level of evolutionary divergence between these two Simbu serogroup clades is more consistent with levels of divergence seen among the other orthobunyavirus serogroups than that seen within serogroups.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Pairwise genetic similarities (1−amino acid p-distance) among viruses within and between serogroups of orthobunyaviruses based on the L segment (a) and S segment (b). For the two Simbu serogroup clades, an extra category is presented that includes only the pairwise similarities between these two groups; this is a subset of the intergroup distances for both clade A and clade B. See Tables S2 and S3 for the list of sequences used in these analyses.

One of the hallmarks of the Simbu serogroup is its extensive geographical distribution, and this has been suggested to be one of the major factors behind the high level of genetic diversity found within this group (Saeed et al., 2001a). Even when considered independently, the two Simbu serogroup clades, both still exhibited extensive geographical distributions (Fig. S3), which may explain the high levels of genetic diversity within each of these two groups compared with many other orthobunyavirus serogroups (Fig. 2). However, clade A (Manzanilla and Oropouche species complex viruses) was unique in being found within the Americas. To date, 77 % (10/13) of Manzanilla and Oropouche species viruses have been isolated from North and/or South America (including Inini virus; Saeed et al., 2001a), but no clade B viruses have been found yet in this region. However, clade A viruses are not restricted only to the Americas, as isolates of some representatives have been obtained from Australia, South Africa and Vietnam (Bryant et al., 2005; Doherty et al., 1979; McIntosh et al., 1965), and serological evidence exists for the presence of Ingwavuma virus (INGV) in Nigeria, the Central African Republic, India, Thailand and Cyprus (http://wwwn.cdc.gov/arbocat/). These differences in distribution between the two genetic clades may relate to differences in vector and/or host range, which can facilitate or restrict the geographical spread of viruses. More effort on the surveillance and identification of arthropod vectors of viruses in this group is necessary to understand better the forces that have shaped and maintain these distinct distributions.

Species-level phylogenetic relationships

Within clade A, two species complexes have been proposed (Nichol et al., 2005); however, the genetic data presented here suggested the presence of at least five different lineages, which should probably be considered distinct species (Figs 1, S1 and S2). Based on a limited number of available sequences, it has been observed that distinct Orthobunyavirus species tend to differ by at least 10 % when comparing NP amino acid sequences (S segment). Utilizing this criterion, clade A should be divided into five different species with Buttonwillow virus (BUTV) forming its own species apart from the other Manzanilla species complex viruses and with the Oropouche species complex being split into three distinct species. Together, UTIV and UVV formed one of the new species within the current Oropouche species complex; the name Utinga is suggested for this species, as this was the first of its members to be described (Shope et al., 1967). Facey’s Paddock virus (FPV), which was a phylogenetic outlier and highly divergent from all of the other clade A viruses (minimum NP divergence = 26 %), represents the other new species previously attributed to the Oropouche species complex.

These species divisions were phylogenetically consistent in both the S- and L-segment trees with between-species amino acid divergences of at least 14.1 and 20.9 %, respectively, and maximum within-species divergences of 7.3 and 17.3 %, respectively. The M-segment phylogeny was also generally consistent with these species, with the exception of the Oropouche species, which was complicated by several potential reassortment events (see below). Excluding Oropouche species viruses, all M-segment, amino acid divergences within species were ≤21.4 %, whilst all divergences between species were ≥32.8 %. These species were also consistent with serological comparisons (Tables 2 and 3), and in certain cases corresponded with available phenotypic information. For example, mosquitoes are the primary vectors for most of the Manzanilla species complex viruses, whereas BUTV has only been associated with Culicoides midges (http://wwwn.cdc.gov/arbocat/). Throughout the rest of the paper, we utilize these five species designations without the use of the term ‘complex’, in order to distinguish them from the species identified previously by the ICTV (Nichol et al., 2005).

Table 2. Complement fixation (CF) results.

Values are displayed as levels of dilution for antibody/antigen (Φ, undiluted). Within the family Bunyaviridae, a CF test generally detects NP antibodies, a marker for the S-segment RNA. In this study, some of the homologous CF titres of four dose hyperimmune ascitic fluid were high (512–1024), probably explaining the more extensive, low-titre heterologous relationship obtained. MDDV, Madre de Dios virus (an unofficial name proposed here to refer to isolate FMD1303); CQV, Cat Que virus (an unofficial name proposed here to refer to isolate VN 04-2108); OROV, Oropouche virus; see Table 1 for other abbreviations. Bold text indicates results from CF tests with antigen and antibody generated from the same virus.

Antigen Antibody
OROV IQTV MDDV JATV UTIV UVV BUTV CQV INGV MERV MANV FPV
OROV 512/≥32 512/≥8 512/≥8 128/≥8 8/≥32 32/≥32 0 32/≥8 0 16/≥8 0 16/≥8
IQTV 512/≥Φ 512/≥Ф 1024/≥Φ 256/≥Ф 0 64/≥Ф 0 64/≥Ф 8/≥Ф 32/≥Ф 0 16/≥Ф
MDDV 512/≥Ф 512/≥Ф 1024/≥Φ 256/≥Ф 16/≥Ф 64/≥Ф 0 64/≥Ф 8/≥Ф 0 0 32/≥Ф
JATV 512/≥Ф 512/≥Ф 1024/≥8 256/≥Ф 0 32/≥Ф 0 64/≥Ф 0 16/≥Ф 0 8/≥8
UTIV 32/≥32 64/≥8 32/≥8 16/≥8 32/≥32 256/≥32 0 32/≥8 0 8/≥8 0 32/≥8
UVV 32/≥32 64/≥8 64/≥8 16/≥8 32/≥32 256/≥32 0 32/≥8 0 8/≥8 0 16/≥8
BUTV 64/≥8 64/≥8 64/≥8 32/≥8 0 8/≥8 32/≥8 32/≥8 8/≥8 8/≥8 0 8/≥8
CQV 64/≥Ф 64/≥Ф 64/≥8 32/≥Ф 0 8/≥Ф 0 512/≥Ф 64/≥Ф 512/≥Ф 16/≥Ф 0
INGV 32/≥8 64/≥8 64/≥8 32/≥8 0 16/≥8 0 512/≥8 64/≥8 512/≥8 16/≥8 0
MERV 8/≥8 32/≥8 64/≥8 16/≥8 0 0 0 256/≥8 32/≥8 512/≥8 8/≥8 0
MANV 64/≥Ф 64/≥8 32/≥8 32/≥8 0 0 0 512/≥Ф 64/≥Ф 512/≥Ф 128/Ф 0
FPV 64/≥Ф 32/≥Ф 64/≥Φ 0 8/≥Ф 32/≥Ф 0 32/≥Ф 8/≥Ф 0 0 512/≥2
Normal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Table 3. Haemagglutination inhibition results.

Haemagglutinating antigen preparation was unsuccessful for BUTV, MANV, UVV, JATV, IQTV, FPV and MDDV. See Tables 1 and 2 for abbreviations. Bold text indicates results from tests with antigen and antibody generated from the same virus.

Antibody Antigen*
OROV UTIV CQV INGV MERV
OROV 1 : 10 240 1 : 160 1 : 80 1 : 20 1 : 40
IQTV 1 : 320 1 : 80 1 : 80 1 : 40 1 : 80
MDDV 1 : 320 1 : 80 1 : 80 1 : 40 1 : 40
JATV 0 0 1 : 40 0 0
UTIV 1 : 20 1 : 20 0 0 0
UVV 1 : 80 1 : 80 1 : 40 0 0
BUTV 0 0 1 : 20 0 0
CQV 1 : 160 1 : 80 1 : 2560 1 : 640 1 : 320
INGV 1 : 80 1 : 40 1 : 80 1 : 160 1 : 160
MANV 0 0 1 : 40 1 : 40 1 : 40
MERV 1 : 40 1 : 40 1 : 160 1 : 160 1 : 640
FPV 1 : 20 0 1 : 20 0 0

*1 unit is the highest antigen dilution in which complete or almost complete hemagglutination (HA) occurred. Tests were run with 4 units/0.025ml.

Unassigned viruses

Four of the viruses sequenced here have not been officially assigned to a species complex by the ICTV. However, using a combination of genetic (Figs 1, S1 and S2) and serological data (Tables 2 and 3), it was clear that one of these viruses (VN04-2108) belonged to the Manzanilla species, whilst the other three [Iquitos (IQTV), Jatobal (JATV) and FMD1303] belonged to the Oropouche species. Virus strain VN 04-2108 was originally reported to be Oya virus (OYAV), based on indirect immunofluorescence assays and its high nucleotide similarity to OYAV, based on a partial S-segment sequence (Bryant et al., 2005). Our S-genome segment was identical to the sequence from the original characterization of VN 04-2108; in fact, this sequence is characteristic of all the ‘Oya’ isolates obtained in Vietnam during that study (Bryant et al., 2005). However, when compared now with all of our newly available sequence data, VN 04-2108 exhibited similar levels of divergence to four named viruses in the Manzanilla species complex: the original OYAV isolate (4.1 % amino acid divergence, 9.6 % nucleotide divergence), Manzanilla virus (MANV, 2.5 % amino acid divergence, 13.1 % nucleotide divergence), INGV (5.7 % amino acid divergence, 11.2 % nucleotide divergence) and Mermet virus (MERV, 4.1 % amino acid divergence, 14.5 % nucleotide divergence). The prototype OYAV virus was isolated from a sick pig in Malaysia during a Nipah virus outbreak and was not available for this study, so all of these divergences were based only on the published portion of the S segment available for the original OYAV isolate (GenBank accession no. AB075611). No genus-wide framework has been proposed for genetically determining which orthobunyaviruses should be uniquely named; however, based on the levels of genetic divergence among currently named viruses in this group, VN 04-2108 should probably be given its own unique name, in which case, Cat Que virus (CQV) is suggested, as this is the name of the community in Vietnam where the infected mosquitoes were collected (Bryant et al., 2005). Alternatively, given the overall genetic and phylogenetic similarity of VN 04-2108, MANV, MERV and INGV across all three genome segments (Figs 1, S1 and S2), it may be more prudent to simplify the nomenclature by referring to all four simply as distinct strains of a single named virus, utilizing the name of the species to which they all belong (e.g. Manzanilla virus VN 04-2108, Manzanilla virus AV 782). UTIV and UVV are also strong candidates for synonymization under a single virus name, as they exhibit even higher levels of sequence similarity than those within the Manzanilla species. High levels of genetic similarity are also seen among named members of the Oropouche species at particular segments; however, relationships are complicated by patterns of reassortment (see below).

FMD1303 is a previously uncharacterized orthobunyavirus that was isolated from a febrile human in the Madre de Dios region of Peru. Serologically, FMD1303 is broadly reactive with OROV, IQTV and JATV, which suggests that it is a member of the Oropouche species, and this is consistent with the available genetic data. The S segment of FMD1303 is identical at the amino acid level to both OROV and IQTV. This is consistent with what is known about the epidemiology of FMD1303, as OROV and IQTV are the only other two Simbu serogroup viruses that have been shown to cause disease in humans (Aguilar et al., 2011; Anderson et al., 1961). However, based on the nucleotide sequence of the S segment, FMD1303 falls outside the range of diversity currently described for OROV/IQTV (Fig. S4). The L-segment phylogeny is also consistent with this finding, although for this segment many fewer sequences are available for comparison, whilst the patterns on the M segment are complicated by reassortment (see below). Nonetheless, this virus expands the known diversity of Oropouche species viruses that infect humans. Due to its distinctiveness, we suggest that this virus be given its own name; we propose the name Madre de Dios virus (MDDV), based on the collection locality.

Partial genome sequences from JATV have previously demonstrated an association with the Oropouche species (Saeed et al., 2001a, b), and our genetic and serological analyses confirm this assignment. However, the complete genome sequence of JATV (GenBank accession nos JQ675601–JQ675603) differs from the partial sequences previously reported for the same strain (GenBank accession nos AF312380 and AF312382) (Saeed et al., 2001a, b). These results were confirmed at the Center for Technological Innovation, Genomic Core, Evandro Chagas Institute, by obtaining a second full-length sequence of a lower passage of JATV strain BeAn 423380 (original seed). Sequences of the original seed and the passaged virus from the World Reference Center for Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses collection are identical. The largest discrepancy between the JATV sequences described here and those that were reported previously lies in the S segment where the two sequences are only 83.4 % identical at the nucleotide level (90.4 % amino acid identity), with polymorphisms present throughout the ~700 bases. The M-segment sequences, on the other hand, are essentially identical across the 570 bases covered by the partial sequence, except for several differences at the ends of the partial M sequence. We cannot account for these differences in the S-segment sequences, as we could not detect the previously published sequence in either of our JATV samples, but we are confident in the quality of the genome sequence reported here.

Reassortment

Reassortment in multi-segmented viruses is a form of genetic exchange that has the potential to provide many of the benefits of sexual exchange; for example, the rapid introduction of novel variation within a lineage, the uncoupling of beneficial mutations from detrimental changes and the ability to combine multiple beneficial mutations that originated in different lineages (Simon-Loriere & Holmes, 2011). In fact, reassortment has been implicated in multiple instances of host/vector range shifts and changes in pathogenicity (Briese et al., 2006; Idris et al., 2008; Le Nouën et al., 2006; Nelson & Holmes, 2007; Parrish & Kawaoka, 2005; Schrauwen et al., 2011). Laboratory experiments have demonstrated that reassortment is common between many bunyaviruses in vitro (Gentsch & Bishop, 1976; Gentsch et al., 1977, 1980; Iroegbu & Pringle, 1981; Pringle & Iroegbu, 1982; Reese et al., 2008), and a number of recent genomic analyses have suggested that reassortment also plays an important role in viral evolution in natural populations (Aguilar et al., 2011; Briese et al., 2006, 2013; Kobayashi et al., 2007; Nunes et al., 2005; Reese et al., 2008; Yanase et al., 2006, 2010). These examples include multiple viruses within the genus Orthobunyavirus. Given the potential evolutionary implications, it is important to monitor for the prevalence of viral reassortment events, especially in virus groups known to infect mammals.

To look for reassortment events, nucleotide-level phylogenetic analyses were conducted, which included only fully sequenced members of the five clade A species (Fig. 3). Phylogenetic discordance, representing potential reassortment, was evident among the phylogenetic trees built from the three different genome segments. More specifically, whilst the S and L trees exhibited nearly identical branching patterns, the M segment supported different relationships among several of the sequenced viruses. In total, there were three discrepancies between the M-segment tree and the S/L-segment trees. The two best-supported discrepancies (bootstraps ≥75.9 in all trees) involved viruses in the Oropouche species. The first involved OROV, IQTV and MDDV. OROV and IQTV were sister taxa in the S/L trees, whilst IQTV and MDDV were sister taxa in the M tree (Fig. 3). Support for the relationships of these three taxa was extremely high in all trees (≥99 bootstrap). Sliding-window analyses in rdp confirmed that these disparate patterns of divergence were consistent throughout each genomic segment, as expected with a reassortment event along one of these three lineages (Figs S5 and S6).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Nucleotide-level phylogenetic trees including only the fully sequenced members of the Oropouche and Manzanilla species complexes. All trees were built in mega v5.1 (Tamura et al., 2011) using the maximum-likelihood framework with partial deletions. The trees are unrooted. Node labels represent percentage bootstrap support values after 1000 resampling events.

IQTV was recently described as a reassortant between OROV and an unknown Simbu serogroup virus based on partial sequences from the S and M segments (Aguilar et al., 2011). Our results are consistent with this finding; furthermore, we were able to identify MDDV as a potential source for the M segment of IQTV. Natural reassortment between MDDV and OROV is certainly plausible given their documented geographical distributions: both viruses have been isolated from the Madre de Dios region of Peru, and the S segment of IQTV is most similar to the S segments from clade II of OROV, which is the only clade, so far, that has been found in Peru (Aguilar et al., 2011; Saeed et al., 2000). Interestingly, the level of amino acid divergence between OROV and both IQTV and MDDV (41–42 %) was on par with levels of divergence seen between species. Whether this reassortment event has resulted in any changes in virulence, vectors or range has yet to be determined. It is also important to keep in mind that, with the current available data, it is impossible to know for certain which of these three viruses represents the true reassortant (Briese et al., 2013). The addition of more complete genome sequences from each of these viral lineages should clarify relationships.

The second potential case of reassortment involved JATV, the Utinga species (i.e. UTIV/UVV) and the lineage leading to the three human viruses (OROV, IQTV and MDDV). In the L and S trees, JATV formed a clade with the three human viruses, whereas in the M-segment tree JATV formed a well-supported clade with the Utinga species (Fig. 3). The rdp analyses demonstrated that these discordant relationships were consistent throughout the entirety of each genome segment (Figs S5 and S6). Based on the high levels of sequence divergence among all three groups of viruses (>45 %), this reassortment event is likely to have occurred many generations ago or to have involved parental viruses that have yet to be isolated and/or sequenced.

JATV has been reported previously to be a reassortant with an S segment from OROV and an M segment from an uncharacterized virus (Saeed et al., 2001b). Whilst our findings were generally consistent with the overall conclusion of reassortment, our S-segment sequence was not consistent with the previously reported S segment (Saeed et al., 2001b). The S segment in this previous publication fell within the OROV clade, whereas our S sequence was a phylogenetic outgroup to the S segments of OROV, IQTV and MDDV (Fig. 3). Our L segment is also consistent with this placement, demonstrating that this is an S/L- vs M-segment reassortment event. Also, based on the available data, it was again impossible to distinguish which of the viral lineages involved represents the true reassortant.

The third potential reassortment event involves Manzanilla species viruses. CQV and INGV were sister taxa in the L/S trees, whereas CQV formed a clade with MANV and MERV in the M-segment tree (Fig. 3). The bootstrap support for these different relationships, however, was lower than that seen in the other discrepancies and the rdp analyses demonstrated that the divergence signals were not consistent across the genome segments (Figs S5 and S6). Therefore, it is unclear whether this third discrepancy is due to reassortment or simply the result of ambiguity in the patterns of divergence.

Conclusion

The addition of 11 fully sequenced genomes for viruses in the Manzanilla and Oropouche species complexes has highlighted a deep evolutionary divide between these two species complexes and the rest of the Simbu serogroup. With sequence data from all three genome segments, we found compelling evidence to divide these two species complexes into five distinct species, and we were also able to identify three potential reassortment events among viruses in these species. Two of these involved viruses that infect humans, and levels of sequence divergence on the reassorted segment were on a par with divergences seen between species. Future work is needed to determine whether any of these reassortments have affected virulence.

Methods

Virus isolates.

All virus stocks used in this study were obtained from the World Reference Center for Emerging Viruses and Arboviruses at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB). The JATV original seed was provided by the World Health Organization Reference Centre for Arboviruses at the Department of Arbovirology and Hemorrhagic Fevers, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Brazilian Ministry of Health. Virus strain FMD1303 was originally isolated at the US Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6) in Lima from a blood sample obtained from a febrile human in Madre de Dios Department, Peru, on 22 March 2007. The histories of the other isolates sequenced in this study have been published previously (see Table 1).

Serological characterization.

All the sequenced viruses were compared with each other and with OROV for serological similarity. Methods used to prepare antigens for the complement fixation (CF) tests and for the preparation of immune ascitic fluids have been described previously (Beaty et al., 1989; Travassos da Rosa et al., 1983; Xu et al., 2007). Both antigens and antibodies were produced in mice. CF tests were performed by the microtitre technique (Beaty et al., 1989; Xu et al., 2007), using 2 U of guinea pig complement with overnight incubation of the antigen and antibody at 4 °C. CF titres were recorded as the highest dilutions giving 3+ or 4+ fixation of complement. Titres of 1 : 8 or greater were considered positive. Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) testing was performed in microtitre plates, as described previously (Travassos da Rosa et al., 1983). HI tests were performed with four haemagglutination units of virus at the optimal pH (5.75) against serial twofold antiserum dilutions, starting at 1 : 20. HI titres of 1 : 20 or greater were considered positive. CF and HI tests were performed at the UTMB, Galveston, TX, USA.

Genome sequencing.

The BeAn 423380 (JATV) and VN 04-2108 (CQV) strains were sequenced and assembled at the Center for Infection and Immunity, Columbia University. The JATV original seed was sequenced and assembled at the Center for Technological Innovation, Genomic and Bioinformatic Cores, Evandro Chagas Institute, Brazil. For these strains, total RNA was first extracted from viral supernatant preserved in TRIzol LS (Invitrogen) and then treated with DNase I (DNA-Free; Ambion). cDNA was generated using the Superscript II system (Invitrogen) with random hexamers linked to an arbitrary 17-mer primer sequence (Cox-Foster et al., 2007). The resulting cDNA was treated with RNase H and then amplified by random PCR (Cox-Foster et al., 2007). Products longer than 70 bp were selected by column purification (MinElute: Qiagen) and ligated to specific adapters for sequencing on the 454 Genome Sequencer FLX (454 Life Sciences) without fragmentation of the cDNA (Cox-Foster et al., 2007; Margulies et al., 2005; Palacios et al., 2008). Software programs accessible through the analysis applications at the GreenePortal website were used for removal of primer sequences, redundancy filtering and sequence assembly. These genomes were completely confirmed using dye-labelled, dideoxynucleotide sequencing.

All other strains were processed at the Center for Genome Sciences, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Fort Detrick, MS, USA. For these strains, total RNA was extracted from viral supernatant preserved in TRIzol LS and was amplified using sequence-independent single primer amplification, as described previously (Djikeng et al., 2008). Amplicons were sheared to ~400 bp and used as starting material for Illumina TRUseq DNA libraries. Sequencing was performed on a HiSeq 2500. Primers were trimmed from the sequencing reads using Cutadapt (Martin, 2011), quality filtering was conducted with Prinseq-lite (Schmieder & Edwards, 2011) and then genomes were assembled using Ray Meta (Boisvert et al., 2012) in combination with custom scripts. When necessary, terminal sequences were completed through PCR and dideoxynucleotide sequencing using a universal orthobunyavirus primer targeting the conserved viral termini (5′-AGTAGTGTRC-3′) in combination with specific primers designed from the sequences generated from the de novo assembly. In addition, four genomes were confirmed with dideoxynucleotide sequencing (BUTV, FPV, UTIV and UVV). These included the six genome segments with the lowest levels of sequence coverage (×30 to ×767). These sequences confirmed the high-quality of assemblies achieved through these methods.

Phylogenetic analysis.

Separate phylogenetic analyses were conducted for each of the three genome segments using only the protein coding portions of the genome. Orthobunyavirus sequences from GenBank were included to provide a representative picture of the entire genus; many of the sequences included cover only a portion of the coding region. Sequences were aligned using the clustal algorithm, which was implemented at the amino acid level in mega v5.1 (Tamura et al., 2011) with additional manual editing to ensure the highest possible alignment quality. Neighbour-joining analyses using p-distance at the amino acid level were performed. The statistical significance of the tree topology was evaluated by 1000 replications of bootstrap resampling. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using mega v5.1 (Tamura et al., 2011).

Reassortment analysis.

To identify potential reassortment events, the data were mined for evidence of phylogenetic discordance. For this analysis, additional phylogenetic trees were reconstructed, which included only fully sequenced members of the Oropouche and Manzanilla species complexes. These trees were reconstructed from the same alignments used above; however, to provide additional power, these trees were conducted using a maximum-likelihood framework at the nucleotide level [implemented in mega v5.1 (Tamura et al., 2011) with the Tamura–Nei substitution model, partial deletion, uniform rates among sites and 1000 bootstrap replications]. Potential reassortment events were then verified using the manual bootscan (Martin et al., 2005) and distance plot methods in rdp4 (Martin et al., 2010).

Pairwise sequence analysis.

Pairwise sequence divergences were calculated among each of our 11 viruses and all of the other orthobunyaviruses with complete genome segment sequences using mega v5.1 with pairwise deletions (Tamura et al., 2011). For the comparisons of divergence within and between serogroups, only one representative of each named species was utilized. This downsampling was done to avoid bias due to intensive sampling of certain viruses.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Carolina Guevara and staff of the NAMRU-6 Virology Department, Lima, Peru, for providing MDDV (FMD1303) and Clayton Lima, Keley Nunes and Jedson Cardoso, Genomic and Bioinformatic Cores, Center for Technological Innovation, Evandro Chagas Institute, for sequencing and assembling the JATV original seed. The work at USAMRIID was funded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency project no. 1881290. Work at UTMB was supported by National Institutes of Health contract HHSN27220100004OI/HHSN27200004/D04. Sequencing and assembling of the JATV original seed was supported by Evandro Chagas Institute internal grant, and CNPq grants 3016401/2010-2 and 302032/2011-8. Work in the Center for Infection and Immunity was supported by the National Institutes of Health (AI057158), USAID PREDICT and the Department of Defense. We are grateful to the Peruvian Ministry of Health for supporting the study and the physicians at the study site for their participation and help. The study protocol was approved by the Naval Medical Research Center Institutional Review Board (Protocol NMRCD.2000.0006) in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the US Army, Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Data

Footnotes

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the virus isolates sequenced in this paper are JQ675598–JQ675603 and KF967136–KF697162, full details of which are given in Table 1.

Six supplementary figures and three supplementary tables are available with the online version of this paper.

References

  1. Aguilar P. V., Barrett A. D., Saeed M. F., Watts D. M., Russell K., Guevara C., Ampuero J. S., Suarez L., Cespedes M. & other authors (2011). Iquitos virus: a novel reassortant Orthobunyavirus associated with human illness in Peru. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5, e1315. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C. R., Spence L. P., Downs W. G., Aitken T. H. (1960). Manzanilla virus: a new virus isolated from the blood of a howler monkey in Trinidad, W.I. Am J Trop Med Hyg 9, 78–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson C. R., Spence L., Downs W. G., Aitken T. H. (1961). Oropouche virus: a new human disease agent from Trinidad, West Indies. Am J Trop Med Hyg 10, 574–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beaty B. J., Calisher C. H., Shope R. E. (1989). Arboviruses. In Diagnostic Procedures for Viral, Rickettsial and Chlamydial Infections, pp. 797–855. Edited by Schmidt N. J., Emmons R. W. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association. [Google Scholar]
  5. Boisvert S., Raymond F., Godzaridis E., Laviolette F., Corbeil J. (2012). Ray Meta: scalable de novo metagenome assembly and profiling. Genome Biol 13, R122. 10.1186/gb-2012-13-12-r122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Briese T., Bird B., Kapoor V., Nichol S. T., Lipkin W. I. (2006). Batai and Ngari viruses: M segment reassortment and association with severe febrile disease outbreaks in East Africa. J Virol 80, 5627–5630. 10.1128/JVI.02448-05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Briese T., Calisher C. H., Higgs S. (2013). Viruses of the family Bunyaviridae: are all available isolates reassortants? Virology 446, 207–216. 10.1016/j.virol.2013.07.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bryant J. E., Crabtree M. B., Nam V. S., Yen N. T., Duc H. M., Miller B. R. (2005). Isolation of arboviruses from mosquitoes collected in northern Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73, 470–473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Calisher C., Karabatsos N. (1988). Arbovirus serogroups: definition and geographic distribution. In The Arboviruses: Epidemiology and Ecology, vol. 1, pp. 19–57. Edited by Monath T. P. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Calisher C. H., Kokernot R. H., De Moore J. F., Boyd K. R., Hayes J., Chappell W. A. (1969). Arbovirus studies in the Ohio-Mississippi Basin, 1964–1967. VI. Mermet: a Simbu-group arbovirus. Am J Trop Med Hyg 18, 779–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Casals J. (1957). Viruses: the versatile parasites I. The arthropod-borne group of animal viruses. Trans N Y Acad Sci 19, 219–235. 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1957.tb00526.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chowdhary R., Street C., Travassos da Rosa A., Nunes M. R., Tee K. K., Hutchison S. K., Vasconcelos P. F., Tesh R. B., Lipkin W. I., Briese T. (2012). Genetic characterization of the Wyeomyia group of orthobunyaviruses and their phylogenetic relationships. J Gen Virol 93, 1023–1034. 10.1099/vir.0.039479-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cox-Foster D. L., Conlan S., Holmes E. C., Palacios G., Evans J. D., Moran N. A., Quan P. L., Briese T., Hornig M. & other authors (2007). A metagenomic survey of microbes in honey bee colony collapse disorder. Science 318, 283–287. 10.1126/science.1146498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Djikeng A., Halpin R., Kuzmickas R., Depasse J., Feldblyum J., Sengamalay N., Afonso C., Zhang X., Anderson N. G. & other authors (2008). Viral genome sequencing by random priming methods. BMC Genomics 9, 5. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Doherty R. L., Carley J. G., Kay B. H., Filippich C., Marks E. N., Frazier C. L. (1979). Isolation of virus strains from mosquitoes collected in Queensland, 1972–1976. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 57, 509–520. 10.1038/icb.1979.52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elliott R. M., Blakqori G. (2011). Bunyaviridae. In Molecular Biology of Orthobunyaviruses, pp. 1–39. Norfolk, UK: Caister. [Google Scholar]
  17. Elliott R. M., Weber F. (2009). Bunyaviruses and the type I interferon system. Viruses 1, 1003–1021. 10.3390/v1031003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Figueiredo L. T. M., Da Rosa A. P. A. (1988). Jatobal virus antigenic characterization by ELISA and neutralization test using EIA as indicator, on tissue culture. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 83, 161–164. 10.1590/S0074-02761988000200003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gentsch J., Bishop D. H. (1976). Recombination and complementation between temperature-sensitive mutants of a Bunyavirus, snowshoe hare virus. J Virol 20, 351–354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gentsch J., Wynne L. R., Clewley J. P., Shope R. E., Bishop D. H. (1977). Formation of recombinants between snowshoe hare and La Crosse bunyaviruses. J Virol 24, 893–902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gentsch J. R., Rozhon E. J., Klimas R. A., El Said L. H., Shope R. E., Bishop D. H. (1980). Evidence from recombinant bunyavirus studies that the M RNA gene products elicit neutralizing antibodies. Virology 102, 190–204. 10.1016/0042-6822(80)90080-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Goller K. V., Höper D., Schirrmeier H., Mettenleiter T. C., Beer M. (2012). Schmallenberg virus as possible ancestor of Shamonda virus. Emerg Infect Dis 18, 1644–1646. 10.3201/eid1810.120835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Idris A. M., Mills-Lujan K., Martin K., Brown J. K. (2008). Melon chlorotic leaf curl virus: characterization and differential reassortment with closest relatives reveal adaptive virulence in the squash leaf curl virus clade and host shifting by the host-restricted bean calico mosaic virus. J Virol 82, 1959–1967. 10.1128/JVI.01992-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Iroegbu C. U., Pringle C. R. (1981). Genetic interactions among viruses of the Bunyamwera complex. J Virol 37, 383–394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kinney R. M., Calisher C. H. (1981). Antigenic relationships among Simbu serogroup (Bunyaviridae) viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 30, 1307–1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kobayashi T., Yanase T., Yamakawa M., Kato T., Yoshida K., Tsuda T. (2007). Genetic diversity and reassortments among Akabane virus field isolates. Virus Res 130, 162–171. 10.1016/j.virusres.2007.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Le Nouën C., Rivallan G., Toquin D., Darlu P., Morin Y., Beven V., de Boisseson C., Cazaban C., Comte S. & other authors (2006). Very virulent infectious bursal disease virus: reduced pathogenicity in a rare natural segment-B-reassorted isolate. J Gen Virol 87, 209–216. 10.1099/vir.0.81184-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lipkin W. I. (2013). The changing face of pathogen discovery and surveillance. Nat Rev Microbiol 11, 133–141. 10.1038/nrmicro2949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Margulies M., Egholm M., Altman W. E., Attiya S., Bader J. S., Bemben L. A., Berka J., Braverman M. S., Chen Y. J. & other authors (2005). Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437, 376–380. 10.1038/nature03959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Martin M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnetjournal 17, 10–12. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Martin D. P., Posada D., Crandall K. A., Williamson C. (2005). A modified bootscan algorithm for automated identification of recombinant sequences and recombination breakpoints. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 21, 98–102. 10.1089/aid.2005.21.98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin D. P., Lemey P., Lott M., Moulton V., Posada D., Lefeuvre P. (2010). RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 26, 2462–2463. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McIntosh B. M., McGillivray G. M., Dickinson D. B. (1965). Ingwavuma virus: an arbovirus isolated in South Africa. S Afr J Med Sci 30, 67–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. McMullan L. K., Folk S. M., Kelly A. J., MacNeil A., Goldsmith C. S., Metcalfe M. G., Batten B. C., Albariño C. G., Zaki S. R. & other authors (2012). A new phlebovirus associated with severe febrile illness in Missouri. N Engl J Med 367, 834–841. 10.1056/NEJMoa1203378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mohamed M., McLees A., Elliott R. M. (2009). Viruses in the Anopheles A, Anopheles B, and Tete serogroups in the Orthobunyavirus genus (family Bunyaviridae) do not encode an NSs protein. J Virol 83, 7612–7618. 10.1128/JVI.02080-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nelson M. I., Holmes E. C. (2007). The evolution of epidemic influenza. Nat Rev Genet 8, 196–205. 10.1038/nrg2053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nichol S. T., Beaty B., Elliott R. M., Goldbach R., Plyusnin A., Schmaljohn C., Tesh R. B. (2005). Family Bunyaviridae. In Virus Taxonomy: Eighth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, pp. 695–716. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nunes M. R., Travassos da Rosa A. P., Weaver S. C., Tesh R. B., Vasconcelos P. F. (2005). Molecular epidemiology of group C viruses (Bunyaviridae, Orthobunyavirus) isolated in the Americas. J Virol 79, 10561–10570. 10.1128/JVI.79.16.10561-10570.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Palacios G., Druce J., Du L., Tran T., Birch C., Briese T., Conlan S., Quan P. L., Hui J. & other authors (2008). A new arenavirus in a cluster of fatal transplant-associated diseases. N Engl J Med 358, 991–998. 10.1056/NEJMoa073785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Parrish C. R., Kawaoka Y. (2005). The origins of new pandemic viruses: the acquisition of new host ranges by canine parvovirus and influenza A viruses. Annu Rev Microbiol 59, 553–586. 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Plyusnin A., Beaty B., Elliott R., Goldbach R., Kormelink R., Lundkvist A., Schmaljohn C., Tesh R. (2012). Family Bunyaviridae. Virus Taxonomy: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, pp. 725–741. Boston, MA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pringle C. R., Iroegbu C. U. (1982). Mutant identifying a third recombination group in a bunyavirus. J Virol 42, 873–879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Reese S. M., Blitvich B. J., Blair C. D., Geske D., Beaty B. J., Black W. C., IV (2008). Potential for La Crosse virus segment reassortment in nature. Virol J 5, 164. 10.1186/1743-422X-5-164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reeves W. C., Scrivani R. P., Hardy J. L., Roberts D. R., Nelson R. L. (1970). Buttonwillow virus, a new arbovirus isolated from mammals and Culicoides midges in Kern County, California. Am J Trop Med Hyg 19, 544–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Saeed M. F., Wang H., Nunes M., Vasconcelos P. F., Weaver S. C., Shope R. E., Watts D. M., Tesh R. B., Barrett A. D. (2000). Nucleotide sequences and phylogeny of the nucleocapsid gene of Oropouche virus. J Gen Virol 81, 743–748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Saeed M. F., Li L., Wang H., Weaver S. C., Barrett A. D. (2001a). Phylogeny of the Simbu serogroup of the genus Bunyavirus. J Gen Virol 82, 2173–2181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Saeed M. F., Wang H., Suderman M., Beasley D. W., Travassos da Rosa A., Li L., Shope R. E., Tesh R. B., Barrett A. D. (2001b). Jatobal virus is a reassortant containing the small RNA of Oropouche virus. Virus Res 77, 25–30. 10.1016/S0168-1702(01)00262-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Savji N., Palacios G., Travassos da Rosa A., Hutchison S., Celone C., Hui J., Briese T., Calisher C. H., Tesh R. B., Lipkin W. I. (2011). Genomic and phylogenetic characterization of Leanyer virus, a novel orthobunyavirus isolated in northern Australia. J Gen Virol 92, 1676–1687. 10.1099/vir.0.028308-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Schmieder R., Edwards R. (2011). Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27, 863–864. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schrauwen E. J., Herfst S., Chutinimitkul S., Bestebroer T. M., Rimmelzwaan G. F., Osterhaus A. D., Kuiken T., Fouchier R. A. (2011). Possible increased pathogenicity of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus upon reassortment. Emerg Infect Dis 17, 200–208. 10.3201/eid1702.101268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Seymour C., Peralta P. H., Montgomery G. G. (1983). Viruses isolated from Panamanian sloths. Am J Trop Med Hyg 32, 1435–1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shope R. E., Paes de Andrade A. H., Bensabath G. (1967). The serological response of animals to virus infection in Utinga Forest, Belem, Brazil. Atas do Simp 243, 225–230. 10.1038/nrmicro2614 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Simon-Loriere E., Holmes E. C. (2011). Why do RNA viruses recombine? Nat Rev Microbiol 9, 617–626. 10.1038/nrmicro2614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. (2011). mega5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28, 2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Travassos da Rosa A. P., Tesh R. B., Pinheiro F. P., Travassos da Rosa J. F., Peterson N. E. (1983). Characterization of eight new phlebotomus fever serogroup arboviruses (Bunyaviridae: Phlebovirus) from the Amazon region of Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 32, 1164–1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Xu F., Liu D., Nunes M. R. T., Travassos da Rosa A. P. A., Tesh R. B., Xiao S. Y. (2007). Antigenic and genetic relationships among Rift Valley fever virus and other selected members of the genus Phlebovirus (Bunyaviridae). Am J Trop Med Hyg 76, 1194–1200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yanase T., Kato T., Yamakawa M., Takayoshi K., Nakamura K., Kokuba T., Tsuda T. (2006). Genetic characterization of Batai virus indicates a genomic reassortment between orthobunyaviruses in nature. Arch Virol 151, 2253–2260. 10.1007/s00705-006-0808-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yanase T., Aizawa M., Kato T., Yamakawa M., Shirafuji H., Tsuda T. (2010). Genetic characterization of Aino and Peaton virus field isolates reveals a genetic reassortment between these viruses in nature. Virus Res 153, 1–7. 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yu X. J., Liang M. F., Zhang S. Y., Liu Y., Li J. D., Sun Y. L., Zhang L., Zhang Q. F., Popov V. L. & other authors (2011). Fever with thrombocytopenia associated with a novel bunyavirus in China. N Engl J Med 364, 1523–1532. 10.1056/NEJMoa1010095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data


Articles from The Journal of General Virology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES