Skip to main content
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders EXTRA logoLink to Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders EXTRA
. 2018 Oct 18;8(3):360–381. doi: 10.1159/000492491

Current Perspectives and Mechanisms of Relationship between Intestinal Microbiota Dysfunction and Dementia: A Review

Menizibeya O Welcome 1,*
PMCID: PMC6244112  PMID: 30483303

Abstract

Background

Accumulating data suggest a crucial role of the intestinal microbiota in the development and progression of neurodegenerative diseases. More recently, emerging reports have revealed an association between intestinal microbiota dysfunctions and dementia, a debilitating multifactorial disorder, characterized by progressive deterioration of cognition and behavior that interferes with the social and professional life of the sufferer. However, the mechanisms of this association are not fully understood.

Summary

In this review, I discuss recent data that suggest mechanisms of cross-talk between intestinal microbiota dysfunction and the brain that underlie the development of dementia. Potential therapeutic options for dementia are also discussed. The pleiotropic signaling of the metabolic products of the intestinal microbiota together with their specific roles in the maintenance of both the intestinal and blood-brain barriers as well as regulation of local, distant, and circulating immunocytes, and enteric, visceral, and central neural functions are integral to a healthy gut and brain.

Key Messages

Research investigating the effect of intestinal microbiota dysfunctions on brain health should focus on multiple interrelated systems involving local and central neuroendocrine, immunocyte, and neural signaling of microbial products and transmitters and neurohumoral cells that not only maintain intestinal, but also blood brain-barrier integrity. The change in intestinal microbiome/dysbiome repertoire is crucial to the development of dementia.

Keywords: Dementia, Intestinal microbiota, Dysbiome repertoire, Gut-brain axis, Microbiota-brain axis

Introduction

The intestinal or gut microbiota can be defined as the overall species of beneficial microbes that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract. The estimated number of these microbes is ∼1014 comprising ∼1,000 species, mainly anaerobic bacteria and archaea, with a fewer number of protozoa, fungi, and other microbes, inhabiting every region of the gut. The gut microbiota represents over 90% of the total microbes that colonize the human body [1, 2].

The intestinal microbes of any region of the gut can substantially influence the health state and development or progression of diseases [3, 4, 5]. These microbes regulate homeostasis and metabolism, in part, through their beneficial activities on intestinal and distant histohematological barrier and permeability, immune system functions, gut motility, absorption of nutrients, and synthesis of microbial-derived beneficial bioactive molecules [6, 7]. Though the gut microbiota has a huge beneficial role, it can become potentially harmful, especially under unfavorable conditions of the intestinal microenvironment, possibly resulting from unhealthy diet and nutrition, antibiotic administration, or pathogenic invasion [8, 9, 10]. The harmful effects of the intestinal microbiota are due to its abnormal behavior, characterized by the presence of pathogenic microbes or a substantial reduction in the proportion of the intestinal beneficial microbes [1, 8].

Emerging data have implicated abnormal intestinal microbiota in the development of dementia [11, 12]. Interestingly, accumulating evidence indicates a key role of the intestinal microbiota in host metabolic regulation, inflammation, synthesis of a couple of molecules that mediate neurohumoral responses, and age-related changes associated with the intestinal microbiota, gut, and functionally related organs [13, 14].

Dementia is a devastating complex, multifactorial clinical syndrome, characterized by progressive deterioration of memory, attention, thinking, comprehension, language, and behavior, severe enough to interfere with occupational or social life, which leads to disability, and subsequently death of the individual [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. The growing prevalence of dementia poses a serious public health concern worldwide [15, 16, 21, 22]. In 2003 worldwide prevalence of dementia was 27.7 million [15]. In 2013 the worldwide prevalence of dementia reached 44.4 million [23]. Two years later, precisely in 2015, the number of individuals suffering from dementia reached 46.8 million, indicating an increment of about 1 million per year in new cases. Recent statistics has revealed that the number of demented persons is expected to increase at an alarming rate, reaching 75.6 million by 2030 [23].

Dementia is associated with high financial burden to the caregiver, family, and healthcare system [17, 18, 24, 25]. Consequently, the increasing prevalence of dementia in the world will lead to enormous financial burden [23, 24]. In 2003 the worldwide costs for dementia was estimated at USD 156 billion [15]. In 2009 alone, the total worldwide cost of dementia increased to USD 422 billion [26]. It increased to USD 817.9 billion in 2010 [27]. By the end of 2018 it is expected to hit USD 1 trillion [27]. These data indicate an urgent need to step up measures that will identify at-risk individuals, and the necessity for increasing global coalescence for novel translational research on the multiple mechanisms of development of dementia that may lead to the potential discovery of newer frontiers in dementia treatment and identification of specific windows of interactions between certain disorders and the brain that underlie the development of dementia.

The constantly growing prevalence and burden of the disease indicate the necessity to investigate the complex mechanisms that underlie the development of dementia and search for newer avenues that could provide potential therapeutic options for the disease. In this paper, I review recent data that suggest mechanisms of cross-talk between intestinal microbiota dysfunctions and the brain that underlie the development of dementia. Contemporary issues about the intestinal microbiota-brain axis are also discussed. The paper also discusses potential therapeutic options for dementia prevention and development.

Current Perspectives on the Etiopathogenesis of Dementia

Brain Disorders and Infectious Diseases that Predispose to the Development of Dementia

Dementia is usually caused by neurodegenerative disorders such as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease [7, 28, 29, 30, 31]. Though Alzheimer's disease accounts for approximately 60–75% of all cases of dementia worldwide [7, 16, 32], the condition can also occur in up to 80% of Parkinson's disease patients [28] and about 40–65% of patients with multiple sclerosis [33, 34]. Dementia can result from cerebrovascular disease such as stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), certain infections such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, herpes simplex virus type 1, human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis, borrelia, toxoplasmosis, cryptococcosis, cysticercosis, cytomegalovirus, Helicobacter pylori, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Borrelia burgdorferi, Huntington's chorea, corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, Niemann-Pick disease type C, normal pressure hydrocephalus, and prion diseases. Alcohol misuse can also cause dementia [7, 21, 28, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38]. These brain disorders lead to inflammation or dysfunctions in neural or glial metabolism that eventually result in loss of connections, and eventually death of brain cells that characterize dementia [7, 21]. However, depending on the physiological reserve of the organism and induction of the compensatory mechanisms, cognitive impairment leading to dementia may be static, progressive, or reversible [30, 39, 40].

Advanced Glycation End Products due to Senescence as a Possible Cause of Dementia

Several reports have revealed that nonenzymatic glycosylation of proteins due to senescence form advanced glycation end products that are resistant to proteolytic processing and can induce protein cross-linking, resulting in induction of oxidative stress and free radical formation, and possibly formation and accumulation of β-amyloid, and inflammation as in the case of Alzheimer's progressive cognitive impairment or dementia [41, 42, 43, 44, 45]. The receptors for the harmful metabolites and proinflammatory molecules due to oxidative stress in neurons and glia (microglia and astrocytes) are believed to mediate the pathological processes observed in dementia [46]. These receptors include the following: NLRP1 (nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor containing pyrin domain 1), NLRP2–5, NLRP9, and NLRP10; TREM2 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2), SRA (scavenger receptor type A); scavenger receptor B-1 (SRB-1); MARCO (macrophage receptor with collagenous structure); RAGE (receptor for advanced-glycosylation end products) and the receptors of the complement system such as Fc receptors; FPR2 (formyl peptide receptor 2); CD11 (cluster of differentiation 11), CD21, CD33, CD35, CD36, CD45, CD68, CD88, and complement receptor 3a and 5a (CD88); TLR2 (toll-like receptor type 2), TLR3, TLR4, TLR6, and TLR7; CMKLR1 (chemokine-like receptor 1); CXCR5 (C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 5) and CXCR16; EP2 (prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype 2); FPR1 and FPRL1 (formyl peptide receptor type 1 and formyl peptide receptor like 1); and leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B2 (LilrB2) among others [47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56]. All these receptors are known as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [57, 58, 59]. PRRs sense and recognize certain motifs on pathogens (pathogen-associated molecular patterns, PAMPs) or molecules released due to cellular damage (damage-associated molecular patterns, DAMPs) [60]. Examples of PAMPs include peptidoglycan, lipopolysaccharides, triacyl lipoproteins, zymosan, teichoic acid, lipoteichoic acid, lipoarabinomannan, arabinogalactan, lipopeptides, flagellin, and foreign nuclear materials such as bacterial DNA and viral RNA, which can trigger the production of proinflammatory cytokines that may trigger the onset of certain peripheral and central diseases characterized by inflammatory reactions [60]. Examples of DAMPs include certain extracellular matrix components released during cell damage (e.g., laminin, fibronectin, elastin, and collagen-derived peptides, matrix metalloproteinase-3 and −13, versican, and biglycan) and cytoplasmic proteins such as heat shock proteins (e.g., Hsp60), RNA and mitochondrial DNA, nuclear DNA, IL-1, high-mobility group box 1 protein, histones, adenosine triphosphate, and antimicrobial peptides – which are altogether known as “alarmins” [60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68]. The recognition of PAMPs or DAMPs by PRRs (e.g., TLRs, CD14) activates signaling pathways such as nuclear factor kappa of B cell (NF-κB) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), leading to the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines and interferons (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), as well as the activation of a range of oxidative stress-related molecules including MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase), PI3K (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase), PKC (protein kinase C), AP-1 (activator protein 1), p38, and numerous autophagy pathways [60, 62, 63, 69]. PAMPs signal downstream via the JAK-STAT (Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription) pathway to initiate the synthesis of interleukins and TNF-α [70]. This pathway of proinflammatory cytokine synthesis is termed the MyD88-dependent pathway because signaling through this pathway occurs via activation of the cytoplasmic adaptor protein myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88 (MyD88). However, there is also an MyD88-independent pathway that controls IFN-β synthesis and activity [60]. This “recognition signaling” occurs at the local (gut epithelium) and central level (brain). In reality, the host cell uses multiple pathways to recognize pathogenic microbes. For instance, the pattern recognition molecules MBL (mannose-binding lectin) and ficolins functioning as opsonins can form a linkage with MBL-associated serine protease-2 (MASP-2), resulting to the formation of MBL-MASP-2 complex, which can recognize and bind to certain carbohydrate motifs on the microbial cell wall to initiate a series of reactions that culminate in the production of proinflammatory cytokines. The signaling of these cytokines can result in altered balance or composition of the intestinal microbes, and as a consequence, increased intestinal permeability [60, 71, 72, 73]. The proinflammatory cytokines can be transported to different tissues including the brain, initiating a neuroinflammatory process in the blood-brain barrier that decreases its permeability [60, 74, 75]. These processes and the signaling cascades mediated by the activation of the amyloid peptide receptors also interact with a range of neurotransmitter systems, which add to the deterioration of cognitive functions [76, 77, 78].

A Possible Role of the Siderocalin-Brain-Type Organic Cation Transporter 1-Megalin Complex, Mediating Neuroinflammation, in the Development of Dementia

The recent discovery of the ubiquitous lipocalin-2 (also known as siderocalin) and its purported role in the brain has sparked considerable interest in the behavior and signaling pathway mediated by this secreted glycoprotein. Though information about the peptide is scanty, functional lipocalin-2 forms a complex with brain-type organic cation transporter 1 and megalin (also known as low-density lipoprotein-related protein 2, LRP2) and contributes to the transport of small hydrophobic molecules. Interestingly the microglial, astroglial, epithelial, and neuronal type of this complex has been shown to be involved in neuroinflammation [79, 80, 81]. Furthermore, LRP2, a receptor for β-amyloid protein, has been implicated in late-onset Alzheimer's disease. In addition to LRP2, LRP1 can form complexes with apolipoprotein E to mediate clearance of β-amyloid protein across the blood-brain barrier. Pharmacological agents that will affect the activities of LRP1 are currently considered potential therapeutic options for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease [82, 83, 84].

Inorganic Deposits in the Brain as a Possible Cause of Dementia

Inorganic deposits in the brain can initiate free radical processes that result in lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, formation of reactive oxygen species, and subsequently accumulation of calcium ion that results to excitatory toxicity [85]. These processes underlie oxidative stress, which activates microglia, at least in part, by stimulating PRRs (e.g., TLRs), resulting in phagocytosis of the toxic molecules. The result of these processes may lead to neurodegeneration [86, 87, 88]. Previous studies showed that murine microglial cells exposed in vitro to aluminosilicate particles stimulated the generation of free radical reactive oxygen metabolites such as hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, and hydroxyl free radicals, leading to tissue injury [89, 90]. Indeed, human studies of Alzheimer's disease have confirmed deposits of inorganic metals in amyloid deposits in specific brain regions [91, 92, 93].

Toxic metals activate signaling pathways related to redox transcription factors such as NF-κB, AP-1, MTF-1 (metal-responsive transcription factor 1), p53 (53-kilodalton tumor protein), ethylene responsive transcription factor 1 (ERF1), ERF2, Ref-1 (redox factor 1), extracellular-signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2), and c-Jun NH 2-terminal kinase (JNK) [94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99]. Indeed. some deposits that characterize senile dementia have been observed to contain inorganic aluminosilicate particles [90]. Interestingly, amyloid deposits that characterize Alzheimer's dementia or progressive cognitive impairment were shown to result in lipid peroxidation and protein phosphorylation, altering glucose metabolism and the mTOR signaling pathway, leading to neuronal death [100].

Toxigenic Metabolites and Dementia

Toxic products of cellular metabolism can also cause neuroinflammation or brain tissue or vascular injury that subsequently leads to demyelination and neurodegeneration [87, 88, 90, 101, 102]. Indeed, dementia due to vascular dysfunction accounts for about 15–30% of all dementia cases [30]. A 1H-MRS study by Herminghaus et al. [103] (2003) found that concentration of certain metabolites, in particular N-acetyl aspartate, was decreased, while total creatine and myo-inositol were significantly increased in the brain of Alzheimer's disease patients. However, comorbid factors may be responsible for the association between metabolic dysfunctions and cognitive impairment [104]. This association has been reviewed elsewhere [105].

Alteration in the Composition of Beneficial Intestinal Microbiota as a Possible Cause of Dementia

A couple of studies have shown alterations in the intestinal microbiota in dementia [7, 9, 10, 11, 12]. A substantial decrease in intestinal microbes, especially Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, as well as changes in Coprobacillus, Dorea, Enterococcaceae, Staphylococcus, Faecalibacterium, Coprococcus, and Roseburia, are believed to be responsible for cognitive impairment and cerebral hypometabolism in neurodegeneration that characterize dementia [106]. The essential role of the intestinal microbiota in regulating both local and distant tissues such as the blood-brain barrier is mediated via multiple mechanisms, which are discussed below [6, 7, 13, 14].

Functional Communication Pathways between the Intestinal Microbiota and the Brain

The connection between the gut and the brain has been suggested since antiquity when the Greek philosophers and scientists suggested a possible relationship between gut disorders and epilepsy [1, 2]. In fact, Hippocrates around 400 B.C. even quoted that “death sits in the bowels,” possibly referring to the disorders associated with bowel malfunctioning [107]. It should be noted, however, that the gut microbiota-dementia connection represents only a portion of the gut-brain axis. The functional pathways through which the intestinal microbiota communicate with the brain, also known as intestinal microbiota-brain cross-talk, is a bidirectional functional communication network between the microbes and the brain that comprises neuroendocrine, neural, and neuroimmune signaling pathways (Fig. 1). The endocrine pathway is mediated by the interaction between the intestinal microbiota and neuroendocrine cells of the gut. The neural pathway of intestinal microbiota-brain cross-talk occurs through the interaction of the intestinal microbiota with the central nervous system (including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, HPA axis), the autonomic nervous system (via the vagus nerve and the sympathetic nerve fibers), and the enteric nervous system. The immune pathway that mediates the cross-talk occurs through the interaction between the intestinal microbiota and immune molecules [108, 109, 110].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Pathways of gut microbiota-brain cross-talk.

The metabolites of the intestinal microbiota such as short-chain fatty acids, GABA (γ-amino butyric acid), serotonin, norepinephrine, histamine, etc. regulate a range of physiological processes in the gut and distant organs, including the brain, via their interaction with neural, neuroendocrine, and immune signaling pathways [108, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114].

Intestinal Microbiota-Neural Signaling

In recent papers, I noted that the gut alone synthesizes over sixty types of transmitter molecules that not only influence gut functions, but also nervous system activity [115, 116]. Thus, dysfunctions in the gut homeostasis due to dysfunction in intestinal microbiota can result in disorder in the synthesis of the gut neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, hormones, and immunomodulators, which can affect the gut-brain axis [60]. Some of the gut-derived hormones can affect the functions and composition of the intestinal microbiota. Surprisingly, not only the gut cells synthesize these neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, hormones, and immunomodulators, but also the intestinal microbiota. Furthermore, the gut microbiota can trigger the synthesis of these molecules from epithelial neuroendocrine cells of the gut. So, the cholinogenic gut microbe, Lactobacillus sp., produces acetylcholine that affects vagal, neuroendocrine, and neuroimmune signaling. Bacillus sp. is a dopaminergic microbe [7, 115, 116]. The intestinal microbiota regulates the HPA axis by the release of cortisol, which may affect microglia activation and cytokine release, homing of distant and local immunocytes to the site of cerebral aggression. The intestinal microbiota can affect long-term potentiation (LTP) via its interaction and regulation of GABA, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, postsynaptic density marker 95 (PSD-95), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [117, 118]. LTP is an important phenomenon in higher mental functions, memory formation, and cognitive processes in which activity-dependent processes are persistently enhanced at neuronal synapses [119, 120]. Dysfunction in LTP induction has been implicated in a range of cognitive impairments that accompany ageing including Alzheimer's disease and dementia [120, 121].

Intestinal Microbiota-Endocrine Signaling

A couple of endocrine factors released by the intestinal microbiota or secreted by the endocrine cells of the gut under the action of the intestinal microbiota can be transported via the circulatory system to the brain where they trigger a range of signaling pathways responsible for higher mental functioning [6, 115]. On the other hand, substances released by the brain can also affect the activities of the gut and intestinal microbiota [6]. Thus, the endocrine pathway represents a crucial bidirectional link between the gut microbiota and brain structures that allows the transfer of humoral factors, which mediate a range of brain activities including cognition [122, 123]. Gut-derived hormones regulate energy homeostasis and exert a substantial influence on the gut's little brain and central nervous system, thereby modulating cognitive functions [1, 60, 75].

Intestinal microbiota dysfunctions result in alteration in microbe- and gut-synthesized hormones including neurotrophic factors and their receptor systems [124, 125], which may predispose to the development of neuronal and glial cell death. Growth hormones protect neurons from toxicity and excessive excitatory signaling [126], in part by stabilizing Ca2+ signaling, stabilizing the expression and NMDA and GABA receptor-mediated signaling [115, 116, 126]. In addition, adequate humoral signaling exerts protective effects on the mitochondria. This way, growth factors prevent neurodegenerative processes that result in dementia [75]. Furthermore, the gut-synthesized hormones leptin, ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide 1, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide confer neuroprotective effects against neurotoxicity induced by harmful pathogenic microbial toxins (toxigenic metabolites) [126, 129, 128]. Consequently, application of analogs of these hormones can be helpful in the treatment of cases of dementia.

Intestinal Microbiota Signaling Is Coupled to Second Messenger Generation: Cooperativity or Confluence of Neural and Endocrine Signaling Pathways?

Ca2+ is a second messenger that links several signaling pathways in the cell. This cellular ion is required to maintain ongoing physiological processes. However, prolonged or excessive increase can become detrimental to the cell [115, 116, 129, 130]. Importantly, destabilization of Ca2+ signaling has been implicated in neurodegeneration [126, 131, 132]. Dysfunctional Ca2+ signaling due to alteration in intestinal microbiota can occur both in the gut and brain. Disorder in intestinal microbiota can result in accumulation of Ca2+ ions, which can lead to cellular toxicity. Although the mechanisms are not fully understood, it may involve multiple disorders involving functional protein complexes (e.g., claudins, occludins, and zonula adherens) which increase paracellular shunt activity in the gut epithelium. This may lead to excessive excitation of the extracellular G-protein-coupled Ca2+ sensing receptor (CaSR) located on different cells of the gut including neuroendocrine and vagal nerve endings [115, 116, 130, 133, 134, 135].

Activation of this receptor can occur not only by extracellular Ca2+, but also other molecules including Mg2+, amino acids, polyamines, and drugs (CaSR agonists or calcimimetics and calcilytics or CaSR antagonists) [136, 137]. But there may be a bidirectional relationship between the CaSR and the intestinal microbiota. A relatively recent report revealed that deficiency of this receptor resulted to intestinal microbiota dysfunction, in addition to reduced intestinal barrier and disordered immune response. This suggests that CaSR may serve as a therapeutic target in dysfunctions of the intestinal microbiota [138].

The vagus nerve endings that mediate signal transfer in the microbiota-gut-brain axis express the CaSR. Consequently, dysfunctions of CaSR signaling in the vagus nerve have been associated with disorder in neurotransmission associated with this nerve and its integrating center with excitatory and inhibitory outputs to multiple brain regions [115, 116, 130, 133, 135]. Moreover, accumulation of Ca2+ in the cytosol of both neurons and glial cells can activate proteases and lipases, which degrade plasma membrane proteins and lipid molecules to generate free radicals that further cause destruction of cellular components. Accumulation of cytosolic Ca2+ can also activate Ca2+-dependent proteases, resulting in hyperphosphorylation of microtubule proteins, triggering changes in the cytoskeleton, similar to those observed in dementia [115, 116, 130, 131, 132].

Dementia-Dysbiome Repertoire

Sudo et al. [139] were the first to report a link between the gut microbiota and the brain. They reported stress response mediated by the HPA axis and decreased BDNF levels in the hippocampus of germ-free mice. Since then, there has been increased interest in studying the functional connectivity between the brain and intestinal microbiota in normal and pathological cells [6, 140]. Recent studies have shown that intestinal microbiota dysfunctions may underlie the development of progressive cognitive impairment or dementia [10, 11, 12]. A recent analysis identified a strong association between dementia and dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota or dysbiome – the total population of harmful microbes that predisposes to the development of dementia [12]. The number of Clostridium difficile in patients with dementia was substantially increased compared to controls [12].

The intestinal microbe Cyanobacteria, occurring during gut dys-homeostasis, can synthesize neurotoxins such as saxitoxin, α-anatoxin, and β-N-methylamino-L-alanine, which may contribute to the development of dementia [7]. Some gut microbes including Citrobacter, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Mycobacteria, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Streptomyces, Staphylococcus, Salmonella, and Bacillus species among others are capable of synthesizing amyloid peptides (e.g., curli amyloid fibers, Aβ42, having CsgA as the major subunits, but also containing CsgB) that are transported and deposited in the brain and may potentially cause cognitive impairment or dementia [7, 72, 141, 142, 143]. By a mechanism of molecular mimicry, these bacterial amyloids can cause neuroinflammation and subsequently neurodegeneration by interfering with inflammatory pathways mediated by TLR2 and NF-κB signaling [144]. The bacterial amyloids also exert local effects on the gut by destroying the protective defenses of the host, at least in part, through enhancement of surface adhesion of pathogenic microbes and biofilm development [7, 141, 142, 143].

A decrease in the number of Bifidobacteria, including B. fragilis, and Eubacterium rectale correlates with cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease [145, 146]. The results of these studies raise important questions as to whether or not some microbes are responsible for the development of dementia. Causative agents of neurodegeneration are yet to be identified [147]. There is currently no effective treatment for dementia as conventional strategies identify patients very late and the treatment usually addresses the symptoms and not the underlying causes [7, 101]. As a result, the prevalence of dementia continues to increase worldwide [148]. In all neurodegenerative diseases associated with dementia there is a reported difference in the composition of gut microbiota compared to that in healthy individuals [7, 146, 147]. Moreover, age-related changes in the composition of the gut microbiota are also associated with dementia [11, 149].

The gut microbiota is responsible for modulating several gut hormones and peptides, including cholecystokinin, corticotropin-releasing factor, neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, pancreatic polypeptide, serotonin, glucagon-like peptide, and ghrelin, which through the vagal and spinal afferents, neuroendocrine and immunocyte signaling can exert a considerable impact on brain functions [140, 150]. Furthermore, the intestinal microbiota has been shown to control the metabolic pathways of synthesis of certain neurotransmitters. The intestinal microbiota regulates the kynurenine pathway involved in tryptophan metabolism, which is required for the synthesis of serotonin [108].

Dysfunctional Intestinal Microbiota Is Associated with Disordered Intestinal and Blood-Brain Barriers: Decrease in Beneficial Intestinal Bacteria and Increase in Potentially Harmful Ones Enhances the Development of Dementia

The increase in permeability of the intestinal and blood-brain barriers is critical to the transport of toxigenic metabolites to the brain (Fig. 2). Toxic metabolites such as trimethylamine N-oxide, D-amino acids, hippurate, phenylacetylglutamine, polyamines including putrescine, cadaverine, agmatine, and tyramine, acrolein, p-cresol sulfate, indoxyl sulfate, indole-3 acetic, phenol- and sulfur-containing compounds, as well as ammonia produced by the intestinal microbes can destroy the junctional complexes of the intestinal epithelial lining, thereby increasing the leakiness of the gut [, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165] (immune responses triggered by these microbial metabolites are integral to leaky gut [163, 164, 165]). This increases impairment in selective transport and paracellular shunt of substances between the gut and circulatory system, allowing for unregulated movement of biomolecules including toxins into the surrounding tissues and circulatory system from the luminal side of the gut (Fig. 2) [166].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The gut mucosa showing intact epithelium and defective epithelium resulting from pathogenic microbial activity, which causes disorder in the sentinel system of the gut (mucous membrane, follicle-associated epithelium, Peyer patches, lymph nodes, resident immunocytes). The defect enhances translocation of pathogenic microbes and toxigenic metabolites, as well as proinflammatory factors, to different regions of the gut where they trigger local inflammatory response, activating immunocytes. The pathogenic microbes and toxigenic metabolites, as well as proinflammatory and inflammatory factors, released from the site of defect and during local inflammatory responses can be transported via circulation to the brain [1, 112]. Furthermore, the toxic metabolites and other substances released can stimulate the enteric brain comprising the enteric glia, the enteric neurons, and the interstitial cells of Cajal, and also regulate the activity and synthesis machinery of neuroendocrine cells and afferent fibers of the vagus and spinal nerves. The lymphatic vessels are also implicated in the inflammatory responses [1].

The toxigenic metabolites can disrupt the endothelium of the blood-brain barrier by altering the expression of sealing claudins, which are supposed to preserve the permeability of the blood-brain barrier (Fig. 2, 3) [156, 167, 168, 169, 170]. In addition, adherens proteins, membrane transporters, basal lamina, and extracellular matrix are affected [151]. Disorder in the expression of sealing claudins and other membrane components of the blood-brain barrier increases the development of neurodegenerative disorders due to unregulated translocation of toxic metabolites, leading to loss of neurons, astrocytes, microglia, endothelial cells, and pericytes (Fig. 3) [151, 171, 172]. Indeed, defects in blood-brain barrier components as well as glial cells have been observed in many neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease [147, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Translocation and generation of toxic metabolites to the neuroglial circuitry mediating cognitive functions. The toxins cause defects in the blood-brain barrier leading to increased translocation of more toxic metabolites and proinflammatory factors to the brain. These factors (e.g., proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines) mediate intracellular signaling that lead to protein and lipid breakdown, mitochondrial dysfunction, and disordered transport processes that culminate in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration characterized for dementia and other brain diseases [120, 121]. For instance, dysbiosis has been associated with increased circulating neurotoxic interleukin mediators, which in turn predispose to the development of neurodegenerative diseases [6, 96]. Furthermore, ageing is associated with increased circulating neurotoxic mediators such as TNF-α, IL-6, and C-reactive protein, which can directly cause low-grade inflammation, that predispose the individual to the development of dementia and other diseases including diabetes [6]. The microbe-derived amyloids on the membrane of neurons, glia, and epithelial cells can stimulate pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as TLRs, causing local and possibly systemic inflammation, at least in part through their interaction with Peyer patches and other immune components of the gut [53]. Increased production of toxic metabolites by the activities of disordered gut microbiota has been implicated in metabolic disorders and local and systemic inflammatory responses [105, 106, 107]. As part of the toxic metabolites transported to the brain, amyloids can initiate a series of intracellular signaling via activation of PPRs such as RAGE, resulting in the activation of microglia [40] and phagocytosis of the amyloids [122, 123]. The binding of the metabolites or amyloids also initiate downstream signaling mediated via NF-κB pathways with resultant activation of the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, resulting in neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity, and oxidative stress [124, 125]. Pathological signaling of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α via the JAK-STAT (Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription) pathway in the central nervous system can disorganize microtubules via yet unknown mechanisms that lead to dysfunctions of microglia, the main immune sentinels of the central nervous system [126, 127, 128, 129]. These microglia progressively lose the ability to clear cellular debris including amyloid proteins, which further stimulate signaling cascades that culminate in cell death [126, 127]. In the case of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease, the accumulating amyloid deposits provoke an inflammatory response that disorganizes the several protective mechanisms that favor neurodegeneration [38]. In addition, signaling pathways that initiate gene transcription such as p38 and other protein kinases are activated [127]. Furthermore, dysfunctions of amyloid peptide-degrading enzymes such as insulysin, neprilysin, and matrix metallopeptidase 9 have been reported in an animal model of dementia [128]. All these processes lead to neurodegeneration which favors the development of dementia or worsens the progression of the disease [124, 125]. It should be noted, however, that PRRs are regulated by molecules such as nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor (NLRs) and Toll-interacting protein (TOLLIP) among others [1, 3]. Toxigenic metabolites that favor the development of dementia and other neurodegenerative diseases may cause substantial defects in these regulatory peptides, thereby resulting to neuroimmune defects that underlie the development of the disease [1, 3].

Decrease in Beneficial Intestinal Microbiota Metabolites is a Fundamental Factor in the Development of Dementia: Implication for New Therapeutic Options

The gut microbiota generates multiple biologically relevant molecules including vitamin K and the B group (B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B8, B9, and B12), certain amino acids, polyphenols (including flavonoids), and short-chain fatty acids such as propionate, acetate, butyrate, valerate, iso-valerate, and iso-butyrate, which modulate both peripheral and central processes to tissue or cellular injury [187, 188, 189]. The gut microbiota metabolites are either used locally by the epithelial cells of the gut or transported to different tissues and cells of the body via the circulatory system to exert an array of effects. Of particular interest are the short-chain fatty acids, which are metabolic products of the action of the intestinal microbiota on certain carbohydrates that are nondigestible by the host cells [190, 191, 192, 193]. The short-chain fatty acids exert their effects on the host cells through the activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPR41, GPR43, and GPR109), modulating the activities of certain epithelial ion channels and neurohumoral responses of the gut and distant tissues and organs [194, 195, 196, 197]. The short-chain fatty acids play a crucial neuromodulatory role in gut neuroendocrine cells and enterocytes, functioning as chemotaxins, antioxidants, antitumorigens, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory agents in the gut, and distant tissues including the brain [75, 197]. Dementia and other neurodegenerative disorders including some gut diseases are characterized by a significant decrease in the beneficial metabolites produced by the intestinal microbiota. Consequently, measures that will lead to elevation of these metabolites in the gut and bloodstream can enhance gut and brain functions in several diseases. The short-chain fatty acid propionate was shown to stimulate intestinal gluconeogenesis, decrease stress, and enhance memory. This short-chain fatty acid stimulates the G-protein-coupled receptor, free fatty acid receptor type 2, located on the epithelial cells of the gut and brain endothelium [171, 198, 199, 200]. Activation of the free fatty acid receptor on colonic enteroendocrine cells by the short-chain fatty acid can stimulate the recruitment of synaptic or membrane vesicle-loaded glucagon-like peptide 1, peptide YY, and other neuropeptides towards the plasma membrane for exocytosis [201]. Furthermore, short-chain fatty acids such as propionate can halt infections by controlling CD14 signaling, suppressing the expression of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1, and reducing oxidative stress via activation of the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2, a guardian of human lifespan that protects against ageing and diseases [171, 202, 203].

Both preclinical and clinical trials have shown the beneficial effects of the administration of agents that enhance the growth of intestinal microbiota [204, 205, 206, 207, 208]. Furthermore, emerging results of clinical trials have revealed immense benefits of the application of intestinal microbes in the treatment of disorders of the gut and brain [209, 210].

Clinical Trials on the Effects of Intestinal Microbiota and Related Products or Their Activators on Gut Health and Cognitive Functions

Transplantation or ingestion of specific intestinal microbiota and products that promote the growth of the beneficial microbes are increasingly gaining attention around the globe. For instance, preclinical trials of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics have shown promise for decreasing dysbiosis, and attenuating neuroinflammation and cognitive disorder. The beneficial effects of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics are due to their action on the enteric nervous system, neuroendocrine system, and vagus, as well as spinal nerve fibers of the gut [204, 205, 207]. Certain microbial agents used as supplements to benefit the host are termed probiotics. Probiotics such as Lactobacillus paracasei, L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. fermentum, L. helveticus, L. rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, B. longum, B. breve, and B. infantis enhance the central nervous system expression of BDNF, NMDA receptor subunits involved in LTP, synaptophysin, and other neuropeptides and synaptic components involved in synaptic and neural plasticity to improve memory and behavior, and decrease anxiety, depression, and a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders [97, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216]. Probiotics also affect the expression of neurotrophic factors in the enteric brain [213, 217].

The usefulness of probiotics is due to their pleiotropic signaling capabilities. They interfere with a range of cellular pathways implicated in the maintenance of homeostasis. For instance, oral probioticotherapy enhances the serum level of tryptophan, which is a precursor of serotonin [118]. Furthermore, an increase in the number of beneficial intestinal microbiota is due to the crucial influence of probiotics. In all, the effects of these beneficial microbes culminate in improved endocrine, immune, and neural signaling, and carbohydrate, protein, and lipid metabolism, which have a summative effect in the attenuation of neuroinflammation, thereby preventing neurodegeneration [218]. In a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, it was revealed that a daily probiotic milk supplementation for 12 weeks in Alzheimer's type dementia patients resulted in a significant improvement in cognitive functions [205]. Evaluation of inflammatory markers showed their substantial reduction, while the patients' metabolic status showed improvement [205]. In another randomized controlled trial, Santocchi et al. [219] (2016) reported that probiotic supplementation in autistic patients resulted in a significant improvement in gut dysfunctions, cognition, and language. In their randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on patients with major depressive disorder, Akkasheh et al. [204] (2016) reported that probiotic supplementation with L. acidophilus, L. casei, and B. bifidum, at a dose of 2 × 109 CFU/g each for 8 weeks, resulted in improvement in symptoms of depression and metabolic state, as well as a decrease in markers of oxidative stress and inflammation. These clinical trials have evidently shown promise for the application of the beneficial intestinal microbes for dementia therapeutics.

Prebiotics are nondigestible food components ingested by the host, but under the fermentative influence of the intestinal microbiota, they confer a range of health benefits to the host. Prebiotics are carbohydrate substances, mainly oligosaccharides. Substances with prebiotic effects include resistant starch, inulin, oligofructose, lactulose, galactooligosaccharides, xyloolidosaccharides, fructo-oligosaccharides, transgalactooligosaccharides, polydextrose, acacia gum, banana, psyllium, wheat dextrin, whole grain corn, and whole grain wheat [210, 213, 220, 221, 222]. Like the probiotics, prebiotics improve gut health, memory, and cognition, and decrease anxiety, depression, and stress [213, 222]. Prebiotics are associated with a decrease in microglial activation, and improvement in brain mitochondrial function and hippocampal plasticity. The result is attenuation of neuroinflammation and reduction in neurodegeneration [212]. Synbiotics are a combination of probiotics and prebiotics. Synbiotics also exert a profound beneficial influence on gut health and the central nervous system [212].

A new clinical trial revealed that a high initial dose followed by a lower daily maintenance dose of microbiota transfer therapy for 8 weeks results in improvement in intestinal microbiota composition and significantly reduces symptoms of gut and neurological disorders [210]. Analysis of a colony of intestinal microbiota over the therapy period revealed a substantial increase in the beneficial microbes Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, Bacteroides fragiles, and Desulfovibrio [210]. Successful application of fecal microbiota transfer therapy is reported elsewhere [209]. An ongoing clinical trial “Microbiome and Dementia” on the effects of fecal microbiota transfer therapy on demented patients is currently underway (2017–2018) (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03167983).

Factors Influencing Intestinal Microbiota-Brain Cross-Talk

Several factors, mainly ageing, genetic, and environmental factors, influence the intestinal microbiota composition and functions as well as the brain to modulate processes that predispose to the development and progression of dementia [223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228]. Age, environment, and genes are important factors that determine or shape the development and progression of dementia and related neurodegenerative diseases [229]. Substantial changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota and the gut functions occur during ageing [226, 227, 228], which may underlie age-related cognitive impairment or dementia. Certain changes in the genome or epigenome of the gut and brain cells may occur due to environmental insults. These changes can have enormous effects on the gut-brain, intestinal gut microbiota-gut and intestinal gut microbiota-brain axes [38].

Conclusion

The intestinal microbiota is a population of health-promoting microbes that controls a couple of cellular signaling pathways and metabolic processes via multiple mechanisms involving immune, neural, and neuroendocrine pathways. These pathways constitute a critical nexus between the intestinal microbiota and the brain. However, the intestinal microbes are affected by several factors, which may result in a reduction in the population of health-promoting microbes. The intestinal microbiota plays a critical role in the etiopathogenesis of neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and neurodegenerative disorders. The association between disorder of the intestinal microbiota and dementia is due to the peculiar role of the metabolic products of the beneficial microbes together with their specific roles in the maintenance of both the intestinal and blood-brain barriers as well as regulation of local, circulating, and distant immunocytes, and enteric, visceral, and central neural functions. It is therefore imperative for studies investigating the impact of gut microbiota on gut and brain health to focus on multiple interrelated systems and organs involving local and central neuroendocrine, immunocyte, and neural signaling of microbial products and transmitter molecules of the intestinal residents and neurohumoral cells that not only maintain the gut, but also the integrity of the blood-brain barrier.

Disclosure Statement

There is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Welcome MO, Mastorakis NE, Pereverzev VA, Neuropsychological functions of the gut microbiota . In: Advances in Psychobiology. Chiappelli F, editor. New York, USA: Nova Science Publishers; 2018. pp. pp. 267–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Welcome MO. Gastrointestinal physiology: development, principles and mechanisms of regulation. In: Welcome MO, editor. History of development of gastrointestinal physiology: from antiquity to modern period and the birth of modern digestive physiology. Cham: Springer; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lerner A, Matthias T. Gut – the Trojan horse in remote organs' autoimmunity. J Clin Cell Immunol. 2016;7:2. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lerner A, Matthias T. Extra intestinal manifestations of CD: common pathways in the gut- remote organs' axes. Int J Celiac Dis. 2017;5((1)):24–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lerner A, Aminov R, Matthias T. Dysbiosis may trigger autoimmune diseases via inappropriate post-translational modification of host proteins. Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb;7:84. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Welcome MO. Gastrointestinal physiology: development, principles and mechanisms of regulation. In: Welcome MO, editor. Functional relationship between the gut and other tissues/organs of the body. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. pp 1009–1028.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91056-7 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alkasir R, Li J, Li X, Jin M, Zhu B. Human gut microbiota: the links with dementia development. Protein Cell. 2017 Feb;8((2)):90–102. doi: 10.1007/s13238-016-0338-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lerner A, Neidhöfer S, Matthias T. The gut microbiome feelings of the brain: a perspective for non-microbiologists. Microorganisms. 2017 Oct;5((4)):66. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5040066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jiang C, Li G, Huang P, Liu Z, Zhao B. The gut microbiota and Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58((1)):1–15. doi: 10.3233/JAD-161141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu X, Wang T, Jin F. Alzheimer's disease and gut microbiota. Sci China Life Sci. 2016 Oct;59((10)):1006–23. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-5083-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Buford TW. (Dis)Trust your gut: the gut microbiome in age-related inflammation, health, and disease. Microbiome. 2017 Jul;5((1)):80. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0296-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Araos R, Andreatos N, Ugalde J, Mitchell S, Mylonakis E, D'Agata EM. Fecal microbiome among nursing home residents with advanced dementia and Clostridium difficile. Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63((6)):1525–31. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5030-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.O'Toole PW, Jeffery IB. Gut microbiota and aging. Science. 2015 Dec;350((6265)):1214–5. doi: 10.1126/science.aac8469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fransen F, van Beek AA, Borghuis T, Aidy SE, Hugenholtz F, van der Gaast-de Jongh C, et al. Aged Gut Microbiota Contributes to Systemical Inflammaging after Transfer to Germ-Free Mice. Front Immunol. 2017 Nov;8:1385. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wimo A, Jonsson L, Winblad B. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and direct costs of dementia in 2003. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;21((3)):175–81. doi: 10.1159/000090733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hung YN, Kadziola Z, Brnabic AJ, Yeh JF, Fuh JL, Hwang JP, et al. The epidemiology and burden of Alzheimer's disease in Taiwan utilizing data from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Aug;8:387–95. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S93323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fiest KM, Jetté N, Roberts JI, Maxwell CJ, Smith EE, Black SE, et al. The prevalence and incidence of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016 Apr;43((S1 Suppl 1)):S3–50. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2016.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.de Jager CA, Msemburi W, Pepper K, Combrinck MI. Dementia prevalence in a rural region of South Africa: a cross-sectional community study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60((3)):1087–96. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chertkow H, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Massoud F. Definitions of dementia and predementia states in Alzheimer's disease and vascular cognitive impairment: consensus from the Canadian conference on diagnosis of dementia. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013 Jul;5(Suppl 1):S2. doi: 10.1186/alzrt198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.James BD, Schneider JA. Increasing incidence of dementia in the oldest old: evidence and implications. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2010 May;2((3)):9. doi: 10.1186/alzrt32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rizzi L, Rosset I, Roriz-Cruz M. Global epidemiology of dementia: alzheimer's and vascular types. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:908915. doi: 10.1155/2014/908915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fratiglioni L, De Ronchi D, Agüero-Torres H. Worldwide prevalence and incidence of dementia. Drugs Aging. 1999 Nov;15((5)):365–75. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199915050-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xu J, Wang J, Wimo A, Fratiglioni L, Qiu C. The economic burden of dementia in China, 1990–2030: implications for health policy. Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Jan;95((1)):18–26. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.167726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wimo A, Winblad B, Jönsson L. The worldwide societal costs of dementia: estimates for 2009. Alzheimers Dement. 2010 Mar;6((2)):98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Neugroschl J, Wang S. Alzheimer's disease: diagnosis and treatment across the spectrum of disease severity. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;78((4)):596–612. doi: 10.1002/msj.20279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wimo A, Jönsson L, Bond J, Prince M, Winblad B, Alzheimer Disease International The worldwide economic impact of dementia 2010. Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Jan;9((1)):1–11.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali GC, Wu YT, Prina AM, Winblad B, et al. The worldwide costs of dementia 2015 and comparisons with 2010. Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Jan;13((1)):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Robinson L, Tang E, Taylor JP. Dementia: timely diagnosis and early intervention. BMJ. 2015 Jun;350(jun15 14):h3029. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Inglese M, Petracca M. Imaging multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases. Prion. 2013 Jan-Feb;7((1)):47–54. doi: 10.4161/pri.22650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chaudhuri K, Samarakoon SM, Chandola HM, Kumar R, Ravishankar B. Evaluation of diet and life style in etiopathogenesis of senile dementia: A survey study. Ayu. 2011 Apr;32((2)):171–6. doi: 10.4103/0974-8520.92554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Du X, Wang X, Geng M. Alzheimer's disease hypothesis and related therapies. Transl Neurodegener. 2018 Jan;7((1)):2. doi: 10.1186/s40035-018-0107-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dong S, Duan Y, Hu Y, Zhao Z. Advances in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease: a re-evaluation of amyloid cascade hypothesis. Transl Neurodegener. 2012 Sep;1((1)):18. doi: 10.1186/2047-9158-1-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Dec;7((12)):1139–51. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70259-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology. 1991 May;41((5)):685–91. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.5.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Knopman DS. Dementia and cerebrovascular disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Feb;81((2)):223–30. doi: 10.4065/81.2.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Almeida OP, Lautenschlager NT. Dementia associated with infectious diseases. Int Psychogeriatr. 2005;17((S1 Suppl 1)):S65–77. doi: 10.1017/s104161020500195x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mawanda F, Wallace R. Can infections cause Alzheimer's disease? Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35((1)):161–80. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxs007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dunn N, Mullee M, Perry VH, Holmes C. Association between dementia and infectious disease: evidence from a case-control study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2005 Apr-Jun;19((2)):91–4. doi: 10.1097/01.wad.0000165511.52746.1f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Larson EB, Kukull WA, Katzman RL. Cognitive impairment: dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Annu Rev Public Health. 1992;13((1)):431–49. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.002243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mathews SB, Arnold SE, Epperson CN. Hospitalization and cognitive decline: can the nature of the relationship be deciphered? Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 May;22((5)):465–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Thome J, Kornhuber J, Münch G, Schinzel R, Taneli Y, Zielke B, et al. [New hypothesis on etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer syndrome. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs)] Nervenarzt. 1996 Nov;67((11)):924–9. doi: 10.1007/s001150050073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Takeuchi M, Yamagishi S. Possible involvement of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14((10)):973–8. doi: 10.2174/138161208784139693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cai Z, Hussain MD, Yan LJ. Microglia, neuroinflammation, and beta-amyloid protein in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Neurosci. 2014 May;124((5)):307–21. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2013.833510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lovestone S, Smith U. Advanced glycation end products, dementia, and diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014 Apr;111((13)):4743–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402277111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yaffe K, Lindquist K, Schwartz AV, Vitartas C, Vittinghoff E, Satterfield S, et al. Advanced glycation end product level, diabetes, and accelerated cognitive aging. Neurology. 2011 Oct;77((14)):1351–6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182315a56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Srikanth V, Maczurek A, Phan T, Steele M, Westcott B, Juskiw D, et al. Advanced glycation endproducts and their receptor RAGE in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2011 May;32((5)):763–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang Y, Ulland TK, Ulrich JD, Song W, Tzaferis JA, Hole JT, et al. TREM2-mediated early microglial response limits diffusion and toxicity of amyloid plaques. J Exp Med. 2016 May;213((5)):667–75. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Doens D, Fernández PL. Microglia receptors and their implications in the response to amyloid β for Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. J Neuroinflammation. 2014 Mar;11((1)):48. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yu Y, Ye RD. Microglial Aβ receptors in Alzheimer's disease. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2015 Jan;35((1)):71–83. doi: 10.1007/s10571-014-0101-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Okuneva O, Li Z, Körber I, Tegelberg S, Joensuu T, Tian L, et al. Brain inflammation is accompanied by peripheral inflammation in Cstb −/− mice, a model for progressive myoclonus epilepsy. J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Nov;13((1)):298. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0764-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rayaprolu S, Mullen B, Baker M, Lynch T, Finger E, Seeley WW, et al. TREM2 in neurodegeneration: evidence for association of the p.R47H variant with frontotemporal dementia and Parkinson's disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2013 Jun;8((1)):19. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-8-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Carneiro LA, Travassos LH. The Interplay between NLRs and Autophagy in Immunity and Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2013 Nov;4:361. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nagyőszi P, Nyúl-Tóth Á, Fazakas C, Wilhelm I, Kozma M, Molnár J, et al. Regulation of NOD-like receptors and inflammasome activation in cerebral endothelial cells. J Neurochem. 2015 Nov;135((3)):551–64. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mandrekar-Colucci S, Landreth GE. Microglia and inflammation in Alzheimer's disease. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2010 Apr;9((2)):156–67. doi: 10.2174/187152710791012071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Doens D, Fernández PL. Microglia receptors and their implications in the response to amyloid β for Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. J Neuroinflammation. 2014 Mar;11((1)):48. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Rubio-Perez JM, Morillas-Ruiz JM. A review: inflammatory process in Alzheimer's disease, role of cytokines. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:756357. doi: 10.1100/2012/756357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gordon S. Pattern recognition receptors: doubling up for the innate immune response. Cell. 2002 Dec;111((7)):927–30. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010 Mar;140((6)):805–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kalantari P. The emerging role of pattern recognition receptors in the pathogenesis of malaria. Vaccines (Basel) 2018 Feb;6((1)):13. doi: 10.3390/vaccines6010013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Welcome MO. Immunomodulatory functions of the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointestinal Physiology: Development, Principles and Mechanisms of Regulation. Cham, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature, 2018:pp 685–771. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91056-7. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Skandalis SS, Dobra K, Götte M, Karousou E, Misra S. Impact of extracellular matrix on cellular behavior: a source of molecular targets in disease. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:482879. doi: 10.1155/2015/482879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Land WG. The Role of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) in Human Diseases: Part II: DAMPs as diagnostics, prognostics and therapeutics in clinical medicine. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2015 May;15((2)):e157–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kim SH, Turnbull J, Guimond S. Extracellular matrix and cell signalling: the dynamic cooperation of integrin, proteoglycan and growth factor receptor. J Endocrinol. 2011 May;209((2)):139–51. doi: 10.1530/JOE-10-0377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Theocharis AD, Skandalis SS, Gialeli C, Karamanos NK. Extracellular matrix structure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016 Feb;97:4–27. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tang D, Kang R, Coyne CB, Zeh HJ, Lotze MT. PAMPs and DAMPs: signal 0s that spur autophagy and immunity. Immunol Rev. 2012 Sep;249((1)):158–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01146.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bianchi ME. DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger. J Leukoc Biol. 2007 Jan;81((1)):1–5. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0306164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tsan MF. Heat shock proteins and high mobility group box 1 protein lack cytokine function. J Leukoc Biol. 2011 Jun;89((6)):847–53. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0810471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi Y, Sursal T, Junger W, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010 Mar;464((7285)):104–7. doi: 10.1038/nature08780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.McCarthy CG, Goulopoulou S, Wenceslau CF, Spitler K, Matsumoto T, Webb RC. Toll-like receptors and damage-associated molecular patterns: novel links between inflammation and hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014 Jan;306((2)):H184–96. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00328.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Friedland RP, Chapman MR. The role of microbial amyloid in neurodegeneration. PLoS Pathog. 2017 Dec;13((12)):e1006654. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kilpatrick DC, Chalmers JD. Human L-ficolin (ficolin-2) and its clinical significance. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:138797. doi: 10.1155/2012/138797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Degn SE, Jensen L, Olszowski T, Jensenius JC, Thiel S. Co-complexes of MASP-1 and MASP-2 associated with the soluble pattern-recognition molecules drive lectin pathway activation in a manner inhibitable by MAp44. J Immunol. 2013 Aug;191((3)):1334–45. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Møller-Kristensen M, Thiel S, Sjöholm A, Matsushita M, Jensenius JC. Cooperation between MASP-1 and MASP-2 in the generation of C3 convertase through the MBL pathway. Int Immunol. 2007 Feb;19((2)):141–9. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxl131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Foster JA, Rinaman L, Cryan JF. Stress & the gut-brain axis: regulation by the microbiome. Neurobiol Stress. 2017 Mar;7:124–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bonfili L, Cecarini V, Berardi S, Scarpona S, Suchodolski JS, Nasuti C, et al. Microbiota modulation counteracts Alzheimer's disease progression influencing neuronal proteolysis and gut hormones plasma levels. Sci Rep. 2017 May;7((1)):2426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02587-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Madsen K, Neumann WJ, Holst K, Marner L, Haahr MT, Lehel S, et al. Cerebral serotonin 4 receptors and amyloid-β in early Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26((3)):457–66. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Severino M, Sivasaravanaparan M, Olesen LØ, von Linstow CU, Metaxas A, Bouzinova EV, et al. Established amyloid-β pathology is unaffected by chronic treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2018 May;4:215–23. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Danysz W, Parsons CG. Alzheimer's disease, β-amyloid, glutamate, NMDA receptors and memantine—searching for the connections. Br J Pharmacol. 2012 Sep;167((2)):324–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02057.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kjeldsen L, Johnsen AH, Sengeløv H, Borregaard N. Isolation and primary structure of NGAL, a novel protein associated with human neutrophil gelatinase. J Biol Chem. 1993 May;268((14)):10425–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Song J, Kim OY. Perspectives in Lipocalin-2: Emerging Biomarker for Medical Diagnosis and Prognosis for Alzheimer's Disease. Clin Nutr Res. 2018 Jan;7((1)):1–10. doi: 10.7762/cnr.2018.7.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chia WJ, Tan FC, Ong WY, Dawe GS. Expression and localisation of brain-type organic cation transporter (BOCT/24p3R/LCN2R) in the normal rat hippocampus and after kainate-induced excitotoxicity. Neurochem Int. 2015 Aug;87:43–59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2015.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shinohara M, Tachibana M, Kanekiyo T, Bu G. Role of LRP1 in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease: evidence from clinical and preclinical studies. J Lipid Res. 2017 Jul;58((7)):1267–81. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R075796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Martiskainen H, Haapasalo A, Kurkinen KM, Pihlajamäki J, Soininen H, Hiltunen M. Targeting ApoE4/ApoE receptor LRP1 in Alzheimer's disease. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013 Jul;17((7)):781–94. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2013.789862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wang LL, Pan XL, Wang Y, Tang HD, Deng YL, Ren RJ, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in LRP2 is associated with susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease in the Chinese population. Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Jan;412((3-4)):268–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Varadarajan S, Yatin S, Aksenova M, Butterfield DA. Review: alzheimer's amyloid beta-peptide-associated free radical oxidative stress and neurotoxicity. J Struct Biol. 2000 Jun;130((2-3)):184–208. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.2000.4274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Evans PH, Klinowski J, Yano E. Cephaloconiosis: a free radical perspective on the proposed particulate-induced etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer's dementia and related disorders. Med Hypotheses. 1991 Mar;34((3)):209–19. doi: 10.1016/0306-9877(91)90213-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Gambuzza ME, Sofo V, Salmeri FM, Soraci L, Marino S, Bramanti P. Toll-like receptors in Alzheimer's disease: a therapeutic perspective. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2014;13((9)):1542–58. doi: 10.2174/1871527313666140806124850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yin Z, Raj D, Saiepour N, Van Dam D, Brouwer N, Holtman IR, et al. Immune hyperreactivity of Aβ plaque-associated microglia in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2017 Jul;55:115–22. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Evans PH, Yano E, Klinowski J, Peterhans E. Oxidative damage in Alzheimer's dementia, and the potential etiopathogenic role of aluminosilicates, microglia and micronutrient interactions. EXS. 1992;62:178–89. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7460-1_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Evans PH. Free radicals in brain metabolism and pathology. Br Med Bull. 1993 Jul;49((3)):577–87. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Maynard CJ, Bush AI, Masters CL, Cappai R, Li QX. Metals and amyloid-β in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Exp Pathol. 2005 Jun;86((3)):147–59. doi: 10.1111/j.0959-9673.2005.00434.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Mathys ZK, White AR. Copper and Alzheimer's disease. Adv Neurobiol. 2017;18:199–216. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60189-2_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Szabo ST, Harry GJ, Hayden KM, Szabo DT, Birnbaum L. Comparison of metal levels between postmortem brain and ventricular fluid in Alzheimer's disease and nondemented elderly controls. Toxicol Sci. 2016 Apr;150((2)):292–300. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Valko M, Morris H, Cronin MT. Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12((10)):1161–208. doi: 10.2174/0929867053764635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Koedrith P, Seo YR. Advances in carcinogenic metal toxicity and potential molecular markers. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12((12)):9576–95. doi: 10.3390/ijms12129576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Nzengue Y, Candéias SM, Sauvaigo S, Douki T, Favier A, Rachidi W, et al. The toxicity redox mechanisms of cadmium alone or together with copper and zinc homeostasis alteration: its redox biomarkers. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2011 Jul;25((3)):171–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Hasan MK, Liu C, Wang F, Ahammed GJ, Zhou J, Xu MX, et al. Glutathione-mediated regulation of nitric oxide, S-nitrosothiol and redox homeostasis confers cadmium tolerance by inducing transcription factors and stress response genes in tomato. Chemosphere. 2016 Oct;161:536–45. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Huff MO, Todd SL, Smith AL, Elpers JT, Smith AP, Murphy RD, et al. Arsenite and cadmium activate MAPK/ERK via membrane estrogen receptors and G-protein coupled estrogen receptor signaling in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. Toxicol Sci. 2016 Jul;152((1)):62–71. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Adams TK, Saydam N, Steiner F, Schaffner W, Freedman JH. Activation of gene expression by metal-responsive signal transduction pathways. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Oct;110((5 Suppl 5)):813–7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s5813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Butterfield DA, Boyd-Kimball D. oxidative stress, amyloid-β peptide, and altered key molecular pathways in the pathogenesis and progression of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62((3)):1345–67. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Iemolo F, Duro G, Rizzo C, Castiglia L, Hachinski V, Caruso C. Pathophysiology of vascular dementia. Immun Ageing. 2009 Nov;6((1)):13. doi: 10.1186/1742-4933-6-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Tong XK, Hamel E. Regional cholinergic denervation of cortical microvessels and nitric oxide synthase-containing neurons in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience. 1999;92((1)):163–75. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00750-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Herminghaus S, Frölich L, Gorriz C, Pilatus U, Dierks T, Wittsack HJ, et al. Brain metabolism in Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia assessed by in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Psychiatry Res. 2003 Jul;123((3)):183–90. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4927(03)00071-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Panza F, Frisardi V, Seripa D, Imbimbo BP, Sancarlo D, D'Onofrio G, et al. Metabolic syndrome, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011 Aug;8((5)):492–509. doi: 10.2174/156720511796391818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Frisardi V, Solfrizzi V, Seripa D, Capurso C, Santamato A, Sancarlo D, et al. Metabolic-cognitive syndrome: a cross-talk between metabolic syndrome and Alzheimer's disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2010 Oct;9((4)):399–417. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Sanguinetti E, Collado MC, Marrachelli VG, Monleon D, Selma-Royo M, Pardo-Tendero MM, et al. Microbiome-metabolome signatures in mice genetically prone to develop dementia, fed a normal or fatty diet. Sci Rep. 2018 Mar;8((1)):4907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23261-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Sbahi H, Di Palma JA. Faecal microbiota transplantation: applications and limitations in treating gastrointestinal disorders. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2016 May;3((1)):e000087. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2016-000087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.O'Mahony SM, Clarke G, Borre YE, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain-gut-microbiome axis. Behav Brain Res. 2015 Jan;277:32–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Thakur AK, Shakya A, Husain GM, Emerald M, Kumar V. Gut-Microbiota and Mental Health: Current and Future Perspectives. J Pharmacol Clin Toxicol. 2014;2((1)):1016. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Gut instincts: microbiota as a key regulator of brain development, ageing and neurodegeneration. J Physiol. 2017 Jan;595((2)):489–503. doi: 10.1113/JP273106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Cristiano C, Lama A, Lembo F, Mollica MP, Calignano A, Mattace Raso G. Interplay between peripheral and central inflammation in autism spectrum disorders: possible nutritional and therapeutic strategies. Front Physiol. 2018 Mar;9:184. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lin L, Zhang J. Role of intestinal microbiota and metabolites on gut homeostasis and human diseases. BMC Immunol. 2017 Jan;18((1)):2. doi: 10.1186/s12865-016-0187-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Rowland I, Gibson G, Heinken A, Scott K, Swann J, Thiele I, et al. Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur J Nutr. 2018 Feb;57((1)):1–24. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1445-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Rooks MG, Garrett WS. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016 May;16((6)):341–52. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Welcome MO, Gastrointestinal hormones Gastrointestinal Physiology: Development, Principles and Mechanisms of Regulation. Cham, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature, 2018:pp 455–526. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91056-7. [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Welcome MO. Cham, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature, 2018. Neural secretions and regulation of gut functions Gastrointestinal Physiology: Development, Principles and Mechanisms of Regulation; pp. pp 527–684.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91056-7 [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Yoshiike Y, Kimura T, Yamashita S, Furudate H, Mizoroki T, Murayama M, et al. GABA(A) receptor-mediated acceleration of aging-associated memory decline in APP/PS1 mice and its pharmacological treatment by picrotoxin. PLoS One. 2008 Aug;3((8)):e3029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang H, Lee IS, Braun C, Enck P. Effect of probiotics on central nervous system functions in animals and humans: a systematic review. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Oct;22((4)):589–605. doi: 10.5056/jnm16018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Skaper SD, Facci L, Zusso M, Giusti P. Synaptic plasticity, dementia and Alzheimer disease. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2017;16((3)):220–33. doi: 10.2174/1871527316666170113120853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Boric K, Muñoz P, Gallagher M, Kirkwood A. Potential adaptive function for altered long-term potentiation mechanisms in aging hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2008 Aug;28((32)):8034–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2036-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Lynch MA. Age-related impairment in long-term potentiation in hippocampus: a role for the cytokine, interleukin-1 beta? Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Dec;56((5)):571–89. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00054-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Clarke G, Stilling RM, Kennedy PJ, Stanton C, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Minireview: Gut microbiota: the neglected endocrine organ. Mol Endocrinol. 2014 Aug;28((8)):1221–38. doi: 10.1210/me.2014-1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Farzi A, Fröhlich EE, Holzer P. Gut microbiota and the neuroendocrine system. neurotherapeutics. 2018;15((1)):5–22. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0600-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ghaisas S, Maher J, Kanthasamy A. Gut microbiome in health and disease: linking the microbiome-gut-brain axis and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of systemic and neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Feb;158:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Carding S, Verbeke K, Vipond DT, Corfe BM, Owen LJ. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015 Feb;26:26191. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v26.26191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Mattson MP, Barger SW, Cheng B, Lieberburg I, Smith-Swintosky VL, Rydel RE. beta-Amyloid precursor protein metabolites and loss of neuronal Ca2+ homeostasis in Alzheimer's disease. Trends Neurosci. 1993 Oct;16((10)):409–14. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90009-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Bayliss JA, Lemus M, Santos VV, Deo M, Elsworth JD, Andrews ZB. Acylated but not des-acyl ghrelin is neuroprotective in an MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease. J Neurochem. 2016 May;137((3)):460–71. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Shen XL, Song N, Du XX, Li Y, Xie JX, Jiang H. Nesfatin-1 protects dopaminergic neurons against MPP+/MPTP-induced neurotoxicity through the C-Raf-ERK1/2-dependent anti-apoptotic pathway. Sci Rep. 2017 Jan;7((1)):40961. doi: 10.1038/srep40961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Welcome MO. Gastrointestinal physiology: development, principles and mechanisms of regulation. In: Welcome MO, editor. Molecular mechanisms of gastrointestinal signaling. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. pp 227–315.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91056-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Dufner MM, Kirchhoff P, Remy C, Hafner P, Müller MK, Cheng SX, et al. The calcium-sensing receptor acts as a modulator of gastric acid secretion in freshly isolated human gastric glands. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005 Dec;289((6)):G1084–90. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00571.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Smith-Swintosky VL, Mattson MP. Glutamate, beta-amyloid precursor proteins, and calcium mediated neurofibrillary degeneration. J Neural Transm Suppl. 1994;44:29–45. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9350-1_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Cheng SX, Lightfoot YL, Yang T, Zadeh M, Tang L, Sahay B, et al. Epithelial CaSR deficiency alters intestinal integrity and promotes proinflammatory immune responses. FEBS Lett. 2014 Nov;588((22)):4158–66. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Riccardi D, Brown EM. Physiology and pathophysiology of the calcium-sensing receptor in the kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010 Mar;298((3)):F485–99. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00608.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Tang L, Cheng CY, Sun X, Pedicone AJ, Mohamadzadeh M, Cheng SX. The extracellular calcium-sensing receptor in the intestine: evidence for regulation of colonic absorption, secretion, motility, and immunity. Front Physiol. 2016 Jun;7:245. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Owen JL, Cheng SX, Ge Y, Sahay B, Mohamadzadeh M. The role of the calcium-sensing receptor in gastrointestinal inflammation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016 Jan;49:44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.10.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Zhang C, Miller CL, Gorkhali R, Zou J, Huang K, Brown EM, et al. Molecular basis of the extracellular ligands mediated signaling by the calcium sensing receptor. Front Physiol. 2016 Sep;7:441. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Vahe C, Benomar K, Espiard S, Coppin L, Jannin A, Odou MF, et al. Diseases associated with calcium-sensing receptor. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Jan;12((1)):19. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0570-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Cheng SX, Lightfoot YL, Yang T, Zadeh M, Tang L, Sahay B, et al. Epithelial CaSR deficiency alters intestinal integrity and promotes proinflammatory immune responses. FEBS Lett. 2014 Nov;588((22)):4158–66. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, Yu XN, et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol. 2004 Jul;558((Pt 1)):263–75. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Lach G, Schellekens H, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Anxiety, depression, and the microbiome: a role for gut peptides. Neurotherapeutics. 2018 Jan;15((1)):36–59. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0585-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Friedland RP, Chapman MR. The role of microbial amyloid in neurodegeneration. PLoS Pathog. 2017 Dec;13((12)):e1006654. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Zhou Y, Blanco LP, Smith DR, Chapman MR. Bacterial amyloids. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;849:303–20. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-551-0_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Epstein EA, Chapman MR. Polymerizing the fibre between bacteria and host cells: the biogenesis of functional amyloid fibres. Cell Microbiol. 2008 Jul;10((7)):1413–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01148.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Friedland RP. Mechanisms of molecular mimicry involving the microbiota in neurodegeneration. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45((2)):349–62. doi: 10.3233/JAD-142841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Hsiao EY, McBride SW, Hsien S, Sharon G, Hyde ER, McCue T, et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell. 2013 Dec;155((7)):1451–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Vogt NM, Kerby RL, Dill-McFarland KA, Harding SJ, Merluzzi AP, Johnson SC, et al. Gut microbiome alterations in Alzheimer's disease. Sci Rep. 2017 Oct;7((1)):13537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13601-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Chen WW, Zhang X, Huang WJ. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases (Review) Mol Med Rep. 2016 Apr;13((4)):3391–6. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.4948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Scheltens P, Blennow K, Breteler MM, de Strooper B, Frisoni GB, Salloway S, et al. Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 2016 Jul;388((10043)):505–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01124-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Salazar N, Valdés-Varela L, González S, Gueimonde M, de Los Reyes-Gavilán CG. Nutrition and the gut microbiome in the elderly. Gut Microbes. 2017 Mar;8((2)):82–97. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2016.1256525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Holzer P, Reichmann F, Farzi A. Neuropeptide Y, peptide YY and pancreatic polypeptide in the gut-brain axis. Neuropeptides. 2012 Dec;46((6)):261–74. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2012.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Erdő F, Denes L, de Lange E. Age-associated physiological and pathological changes at the blood-brain barrier: A review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Jan;37((1)):4–24. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16679420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Sawada N, Murata M, Kikuchi K, Osanai M, Tobioka H, Kojima T, et al. Tight junctions and human diseases. Med Electron Microsc. 2003 Sep;36((3)):147–56. doi: 10.1007/s00795-003-0219-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Förster C. Tight junctions and the modulation of barrier function in disease. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008 Jul;130((1)):55–70. doi: 10.1007/s00418-008-0424-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Luettig J, Rosenthal R, Barmeyer C, Schulzke JD. Claudin-2 as a mediator of leaky gut barrier during intestinal inflammation. Tissue Barriers. 2015 Apr;3((1-2)):e977176. doi: 10.4161/21688370.2014.977176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Zihni C, Mills C, Matter K, Balda MS. Tight junctions: from simple barriers to multifunctional molecular gates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016 Sep;17((9)):564–80. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Awad WA, Hess C, Hess M. Enteric pathogens and their toxin-induced disruption of the intestinal barrier through alteration of tight junctions in chickens. Toxins (Basel) 2017 Feb;9((2)):60. doi: 10.3390/toxins9020060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Rossi M, Johnson DW, Campbell KL. The kidney-gut axis: implications for nutrition care. J Ren Nutr. 2015 Sep;25((5)):399–403. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2015.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Coppo R. The gut-kidney axis in IgA nephropathy: role of microbiota and diet on genetic predisposition. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018 Jan;33((1)):53–61. doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3652-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Wing MR, Patel SS, Ramezani A, Raj DS. Gut microbiome in chronic kidney disease. Exp Physiol. 2016 Apr;101((4)):471–7. doi: 10.1113/EP085283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Fernandez-Prado R, Esteras R, Perez-Gomez MV, Gracia-Iguacel C, Gonzalez-Parra E, Sanz AB, et al. Nutrients turned into toxins: microbiota modulation of nutrient properties in chronic kidney disease. Nutrients. 2017 May;9((5)):E489. doi: 10.3390/nu9050489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.De Preter V, Vanhoutte T, Huys G, Swings J, Rutgeerts P, Verbeke K. Effect of lactulose and Saccharomyces boulardii administration on the colonic urea-nitrogen metabolism and the bifidobacteria concentration in healthy human subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr;23((7)):963–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02834.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Vince AJ, Burridge SM. Ammonia production by intestinal bacteria: the effects of lactose, lactulose and glucose. J Med Microbiol. 1980 May;13((2)):177–91. doi: 10.1099/00222615-13-2-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Lees HJ, Swann JR, Wilson ID, Nicholson JK, Holmes E. Hippurate: the natural history of a mammalian-microbial cometabolite. J Proteome Res. 2013 Apr;12((4)):1527–46. doi: 10.1021/pr300900b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.de Andrade LS, Ramos CI, Cuppari L. The cross-talk between the kidney and the gut: implications for chronic kidney disease. Nutrire. 2017;42((1)):27. [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Mu Q, Kirby J, Reilly CM, Luo XM. Leaky gut as a danger signal for autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2017 May;8:598. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Hu X, Wang T, Jin F. Alzheimer's disease and gut microbiota. Sci China Life Sci. 2016 Oct;59((10)):1006–23. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-5083-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Braniste V, Al-Asmakh M, Kowal C, Anuar F, Abbaspour A, Tóth M, et al. The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Nov;6((263)):263ra158. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Kelly JR, Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Clarke G, Hyland NP. Breaking down the barriers: the gut microbiome, intestinal permeability and stress-related psychiatric disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Oct;9:392. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Capaldo CT, Powell DN, Kalman D. Layered defense: how mucus and tight junctions seal the intestinal barrier. J Mol Med (Berl) 2017 Sep;95((9)):927–34. doi: 10.1007/s00109-017-1557-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Amasheh S, Fromm M, Günzel D. Claudins of intestine and nephron - a correlation of molecular tight junction structure and barrier function. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2011 Jan;201((1)):133–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02148.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Hoyles L, Snelling T, Umlai UK, Nicholson JK, Carding SR, Glen RC, et al. Microbiome-host systems interactions: protective effects of propionate upon the blood-brain barrier. Microbiome. 2018 Mar;6((1)):55. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0439-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Fang X. Potential role of gut microbiota and tissue barriers in Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Int J Neurosci. 2016 Sep;126((9)):771–6. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2015.1096271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Ransohoff RM. How neuroinflammation contributes to neurodegeneration. Science. 2016 Aug;353((6301)):777–83. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Erickson MA, Banks WA. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction as a cause and consequence of Alzheimer's disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013 Oct;33((10)):1500–13. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Sagare AP, Bell RD, Zlokovic BV. Neurovascular defects and faulty amyloid-β vascular clearance in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33((s1 Suppl 1)):S87–100. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-129037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Tomimoto H, Akiguchi I, Suenaga T, Nishimura M, Wakita H, Nakamura S, et al. Alterations of the blood-brain barrier and glial cells in white-matter lesions in cerebrovascular and Alzheimer's disease patients. Stroke. 1996 Nov;27((11)):2069–74. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.11.2069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Sabatino A, Regolisti G, Brusasco I, Cabassi A, Morabito S, Fiaccadori E. Alterations of intestinal barrier and microbiota in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Jun;30((6)):924–33. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Browne TC, McQuillan K, McManus RM, O'Reilly JA, Mills KH, Lynch MA. IFN-γ Production by amyloid β-specific Th1 cells promotes microglial activation and increases plaque burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Immunol. 2013 Mar;190((5)):2241–51. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Li X, Melief E, Postupna N, Montine KS, Keene CD, Montine TJ. Prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype 2 regulation of scavenger receptor CD36 modulates microglial Aβ42 phagocytosis. Am J Pathol. 2015 Jan;185((1)):230–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Rangaraju S, Raza SA, Li NX, Betarbet R, Dammer EB, Duong D, et al. Differential phagocytic properties of CD45low microglia and CD45high brain mononuclear phagocytes-activation and age-related effects. Front Immunol. 2018 Mar;9:405. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Ray R, Juranek JK, Rai V. RAGE axis in neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration and its emerging role in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar;62:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Tóbon-Velasco JC, Cuevas E, Torres-Ramos MA. Receptor for AGEs (RAGE) as mediator of NF-kB pathway activation in neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2014;13((9)):1615–26. doi: 10.2174/1871527313666140806144831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Millington C, Sonego S, Karunaweera N, Rangel A, Aldrich-Wright JR, Campbell IL, et al. Chronic neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease: new perspectives on animal models and promising candidate drugs. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:309129. doi: 10.1155/2014/309129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Ghosh S, Wu MD, Shaftel SS, Kyrkanides S, LaFerla FM, Olschowka JA, et al. Sustained interleukin-1β overexpression exacerbates tau pathology despite reduced amyloid burden in an Alzheimer's mouse model. J Neurosci. 2013 Mar;33((11)):5053–64. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4361-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Hickman SE, Allison EK, El Khoury J. Microglial dysfunction and defective beta-amyloid clearance pathways in aging Alzheimer's disease mice. J Neurosci. 2008 Aug;28((33)):8354–60. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0616-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Chio CC, Chang CH, Wang CC, Cheong CU, Chao CM, Cheng BC, et al. Etanercept attenuates traumatic brain injury in rats by reducing early microglial expression of tumor necrosis factor-α. BMC Neurosci. 2013 Mar;14((1)):33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Vernocchi P, Del Chierico F, Putignani L. Gut microbiota profiling: metabolomics based approach to unravel compounds affecting human health. Front Microbiol. 2016 Jul;7:1144. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Lee ES, Song EJ, Nam YD. Dysbiosis of gut microbiome and its impact on epigenetic regulation. J Clin Epigenet. 2017;3:S1. [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Russo R, Cristiano C, Avagliano C, De Caro C, La Rana G, Raso GM, et al. Gut-brain axis: role of lipids in the regulation of inflammation, pain and CNS diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2017 Feb;24((999)):1. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170216113756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes. 2012 Jul-Aug;3((4)):289–306. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Vinke PC, El Aidy S, van Dijk G. The role of supplemental complex dietary carbohydrates and gut microbiota in promoting cardiometabolic and immunological health in obesity: lessons from healthy non-obese individuals. Front Nutr. 2017 Jul;4:34. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2017.00034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Lin HV, Frassetto A, Kowalik EJ, Jr, Nawrocki AR, Lu MM, Kosinski JR, et al. Butyrate and propionate protect against diet-induced obesity and regulate gut hormones via free fatty acid receptor 3-independent mechanisms. PLoS One. 2012;7((4)):e35240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Tahara Y, Yamazaki M, Sukigara H, Motohashi H, Sasaki H, Miyakawa H, et al. Gut microbiota-derived short chain fatty acids induce circadian clock entrainment in mouse peripheral tissue. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan;8((1)):1395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19836-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Oleskin AV, Shenderov BA. Neuromodulatory effects and targets of the SCFAs and gasotransmitters produced by the human symbiotic microbiota. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2016 Jul;27:30971. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v27.30971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Li X, Shimizu Y, Kimura I. Gut microbial metabolite short-chain fatty acids and obesity. Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2017;36((4)):135–40. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.17-010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen AK, Venema K, Reijngoud DJ, Bakker BM. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2013 Sep;54((9)):2325–40. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R036012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Tan J, McKenzie C, Potamitis M, Thorburn AN, Mackay CR, Macia L. The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease. Adv Immunol. 2014;121:91–119. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800100-4.00003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Cole GM, Ma Q-L, Frautschy SA. Dietary fatty acids and the aging brain. Nutr Rev. 2010;68((0 2)):S102–S111. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00345.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Ho L, Ono K, Tsuji M, Mazzola P, Singh R, Pasinetti GM. Protective roles of intestinal microbiota derived short chain fatty acids in Alzheimer's disease-type beta-amyloid neuropathological mechanisms. Expert Rev Neurother. 2018 Jan;18((1)):83–90. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1400909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Wang D, Ho L, Faith J, Ono K, Janle EM, Lachcik PJ, et al. Role of intestinal microbiota in the generation of polyphenol-derived phenolic acid mediated attenuation of Alzheimer's disease β-amyloid oligomerization. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015 Jun;59((6)):1025–40. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Psichas A, Sleeth ML, Murphy KG, Brooks L, Bewick GA, Hanyaloglu AC, et al. The short chain fatty acid propionate stimulates GLP-1 and PYY secretion via free fatty acid receptor 2 in rodents. Int J Obes. 2015 Mar;39((3)):424–9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Lewis KN, Mele J, Hayes JD, Buffenstein R. Nrf2, a guardian of healthspan and gatekeeper of species longevity. Integr Comp Biol. 2010 Nov;50((5)):829–43. doi: 10.1093/icb/icq034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Figarska SM, Vonk JM, Boezen HM. NFE2L2 polymorphisms, mortality, and metabolism in the general population. Physiol Genomics. 2014 Jun;46((12)):411–7. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00178.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Akkasheh G, Kashani-Poor Z, Tajabadi-Ebrahimi M, Jafari P, Akbari H, Taghizadeh M, et al. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrition. 2016 Mar;32((3)):315–20. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Akbari E, Asemi Z, Daneshvar Kakhaki R, Bahmani F, Kouchaki E, Tamtaji OR, et al. Effect of probiotic supplementation on cognitive function and metabolic status in Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, double-blind and controlled trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Nov;8:256. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Jamilian M, Bahmani F, Vahedpoor Z, Salmani A, Tajabadi-Ebrahimi M, Jafari P, et al. Effects of probiotic supplementation on metabolic status in pregnant women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Iran Med. 2016 Oct;19((10)):687–682. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Bambury A, Sandhu K, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Finding the needle in the haystack: systematic identification of psychobiotics. Br J Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;••• doi: 10.1111/bph.14127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Daulatzai MA. Obesity and gut's dysbiosis promote neuroinflammation, cognitive impairment, and vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease: new directions and therapeutic implications. J Mol Genet Med. 2014:S1:005. [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Zhao H, Shi Y, Luo X, Peng L, Yang Y, Zou L. The Effect of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on a Child with Tourette Syndrome. Case Rep Med. 2017;2017:6165239. doi: 10.1155/2017/6165239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Kang DW, Adams JB, Gregory AC, Borody T, Chittick L, Fasano A, et al. Microbiota Transfer Therapy alters gut ecosystem and improves gastrointestinal and autism symptoms: an open-label study. Microbiome. 2017 Jan;5((1)):10. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0225-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Ceccarelli G, Brenchley JM, Cavallari EN, Scheri GC, Fratino M, Pinacchio C, et al. Impact of high-dose multi-strain probiotic supplementation on neurocognitive performance and central nervous system immune activation of HIV-1 infected individuals. Nutrients. 2017 Nov;9((11)):1269. doi: 10.3390/nu9111269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Chunchai T, Thunapong W, Yasom S, Wanchai K, Eaimworawuthikul S, Metzler G, et al. Decreased microglial activation through gut-brain axis by prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics effectively restored cognitive function in obese-insulin resistant rats. J Neuroinflammation. 2018 Jan;15((1)):11. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1055-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Savignac HM, Corona G, Mills H, Chen L, Spencer JP, Tzortzis G, et al. Prebiotic feeding elevates central brain derived neurotrophic factor, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits and D-serine. Neurochem Int. 2013 Dec;63((8)):756–64. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2013.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Maqsood R, Stone TW. The gut-brain axis, BDNF, NMDA and CNS disorders. Neurochem Res. 2016 Nov;41((11)):2819–35. doi: 10.1007/s11064-016-2039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Williams S, Chen L, Savignac HM, Tzortzis G, Anthony DC, Burnet PW. Neonatal prebiotic (BGOS) supplementation increases the levels of synaptophysin, GluN2A-subunits and BDNF proteins in the adult rat hippocampus. Synapse. 2016 Mar;70((3)):121–4. doi: 10.1002/syn.21880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Seitz J, Baines J. Food matters: how the microbiome and gut-brain interaction might impact the development and course of anorexia nervosa. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;26((9)):1031–41. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-0945-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Li C, Cai YY, Yan ZX. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor preserves intestinal mucosal barrier function and alters gut microbiota in mice. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Mar;34((3)):134–41. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Westfall S, Lomis N, Kahouli I, Dia SY, Singh SP, Prakash S. Microbiome, probiotics and neurodegenerative diseases: deciphering the gut brain axis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017 Oct;74((20)):3769–87. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2550-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Santocchi E, Guiducci L, Fulceri F, Billeci L, Buzzigoli E, Apicella F, et al. Gut to brain interaction in Autism Spectrum Disorders: a randomized controlled trial on the role of probiotics on clinical, biochemical and neurophysiological parameters. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;16((1)):183. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0887-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Slavin J. Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients. 2013 Apr;5((4)):1417–35. doi: 10.3390/nu5041417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Pandey KR, Naik SR, Vakil BV. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics- a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2015 Dec;52((12)):7577–87. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-1921-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Burokas A, Arboleya S, Moloney RD, Peterson VL, Murphy K, Clarke G, et al. Targeting the microbiota-gut-brain axis: prebiotics have anxiolytic and antidepressant-like effects and reverse the impact of chronic stress in mice. Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;82((7)):472–87. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Vaiserman AM, Koliada AK, Marotta F. Gut microbiota: A player in aging and a target for anti-aging intervention. Ageing Res Rev. 2017 May;35:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Hu X, Wang T, Jin F. Alzheimer's disease and gut microbiota. Sci China Life Sci. 2016 Oct;59((10)):1006–23. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-5083-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Cenit MC, Sanz Y, Codoñer-Franch P. Influence of gut microbiota on neuropsychiatric disorders. World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug;23((30)):5486–98. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i30.5486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Britton E, McLaughlin JT. Ageing and the gut. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013 Feb;72((1)):173–7. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112002807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Soenen S, Rayner CK, Jones KL, Horowitz M. The ageing gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2016 Jan;19((1)):12–8. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Rayner CK, Horowitz M. Physiology of the ageing gut. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013 Jan;16((1)):33–8. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32835acaf4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Saraswati S, Sitaraman R. Aging and the human gut microbiota-from correlation to causality. Front Microbiol. 2015 Jan;5:764. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders EXTRA are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES