Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 29.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2015 Aug 25;386(10006):1804–1805. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00047-1

Risks during pregnancy in women with epilepsy

Kimford J Meador 1
PMCID: PMC6350524  NIHMSID: NIHMS1003436  PMID: 26318521

Since 2000, a great deal of new information has become available about pregnancy outcomes in women with epilepsy. Most of this information has been related to the risks of major congenital malformations and cognitive behavioural deficits in children of women with epilepsy who had fetal antiepileptic drug exposure.13 These studies have emphasised the risks of major congenital malformations, cognitive impairment, and autistic spectrum disorder for children exposed in utero to valproate (9·3% at 1 year of age).17 Intermediate risks for major congenital malformations have been associated with fetal phenobarbital (5·5%) and topiramate (4·2%) exposures.1,2,4 Low risks for major congenital malformations have been associated with exposure to carbamazepine (2·9%), lamotrigine (2·0%), levetiracetam (2·4%), and oxcarbazepinem (2·2%).1,2,4 Low risks for cognitive problems have been reported for carbamazepine, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam, which do not differ statistically from the unexposed population.6,8 The risks for most antiepileptic drugs and polytherapies are uncertain.

Even less information is available for other pregnancy risks in women with epilepsy, and individual studies have resulted in varied and imprecise estimates of risks. The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) reviewed the scientific literature and published practice parameters in 2009, which stated that probably no substantially increased risk exists of caesarean delivery, late pregnancy bleeding, or premature labour and delivery in women with epilepsy who are taking antiepileptic drugs.2 Women with epilepsy who were seizure-free during the 9 months before conception are likely to stay seizure-free during pregnancy.2 The AAN review group concluded that strong evidence is needed to establish if there are increased risks for a variety of obstetrical and seizure events during pregnancy in women with epilepsy.

In The Lancet, Luz Viale and colleagues present the results of their systematic review and meta-analysis9 of observational studies to assess risks of maternal and fetal complications (excluding malformations and cognitive-behavioural deficits). Viale and colleagues’ analyses included 38 studies with 2837325 pregnancies. Women with epilepsy versus those without epilepsy had increased risks for spontaneous miscarriage (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% CI 1.02–2.32), antepartum haemorrhage (1.49, 1.01–2.20), postpartum haemorrhage (1.29, 1.13–1.49), hypertensive disorders (1.37, 1.21–1.55), induction of labour (1.67, 1.31–2.11), caesarean section (1.40, 1.23–1.58), any preterm birth (1.16, 1.01–1.34), and fetal growth restriction (1.26, 1.20–1.33). Women with epilepsy taking antiepileptic drugs versus women with epilepsy not taking antiepileptic drugs had increased risk for post-partum haemorrhage (1.33, 1.16–1.54), induction of labour (1.40, 1.05–1.85), fetal growth restriction (3.51, 1.23–10.01), and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (1.42, 1.13–1.78). Women with epilepsy on polytherapy versus monotherapy had increased risk of caesarean section (1.47, 1.07–2.02). No increased risk was noted for fetal or neonatal mortality. The investigators conclude that epilepsy and exposure to antiepileptic drugs are associated with a small but significant risk for several adverse outcomes during pregnancy.

Viale and colleagues’ study9 is well conducted and adds to existing published work by providing improved estimates for several risks during pregnancy in women with epilepsy. This information can be used to counsel women with epilepsy and manage care during their pregnancies. Limitations to the study include a shortage of information about seizures, parity, smoking, underlying medical conditions, specific antiepileptic drugs, dosing, and blood concentrations. The differences in statistical findings for women with epilepsy versus women without epilepsy, women with epilepsy on antiepileptic drugs versus those not on antiepileptic drugs, and women with epilepsy on polytherapy versus those on monotherapy might be due to differences in sample sizes across these comparisons.

Although most women with epilepsy have normal pregnancy outcomes, they and their children are at increased risk of adverse outcomes. Knowledge of these risks has grown since 2000, but many issues are uncertain. Future prospective investigations are needed to address risks of seizures, specific antiepileptic drugs, effects of antiepileptic drug dose, congenital malformations, long-term cognitive-behavioural outcomes, and other pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, these studies need to address the risks of antiepileptic drug treatment during pregnancy in women without epilepsy, because more than half of antiepileptic drug prescriptions are for disorders other than epilepsy (eg, pain and psychiatric symptoms).10

Acknowledgments

I have received research funding from the Epilepsy Foundation and UCB Pharma; and have consulted for Eisai, GW Pharmaceuticals, NeuroPace, Novartis, Supernus, Upsher Smith Laboratories, UCB Pharma, and Vivus Pharmaceuticals, with all fees paid to the Epilepsy Consortium which then pays a proportion to my institution.

References

  • 1.Tomson T, Battino D. Teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 803–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Harden CL, Meador KJ, Pennell PB, et al. , American Academy of Neurology, American Epilepsy Society. Management issues for women with epilepsy—focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): II. Teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes: report of the quality standards subcommittee and therapeutics and technology subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsia 2009; 50: 1237–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hill DS, Wlodarczyk BJ, Palacios AM, Finnell RH. Teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs. Expert Rev Neurother 2010; 10: 943–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hernandez-Diaz S, Smith CR, Shen A, et al. , for the North American AED Pregnancy Registry. Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. Neurology 2012; 78: 1692–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, et al. , for the EURAP study group. Dose-dependent risk of malformations with antiepileptic drugs: an analysis of data from the EURAP epilepsy and pregnancy registry. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 609–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Meador KJ, Baker GA, Browning N, et al. , NEAD Study Group. Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure and cognitive outcomes at age 6 years (NEAD study): a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 244–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Christensen J, Gronborg TK, Sorensen MJ, et al. Prenatal valproate exposure and risk of autism spectrum disorders and childhood autism. JAMA 2013; 309: 1696–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shallcross R, Bromley RL, Cheyne CP, Liverpool and Manchester Neurodevelopment Group, UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register. In utero exposure to levetiracetam vs valproate: development and language at 3 years of age. Neurology 2014; 82: 213–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Viale L, Allotey J, Cheong-See F, et al. , for EBMCONNECT Collaboration. Epilepsy in pregnancy and reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2015; published online Aug 26. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00045-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bobo WV, Davis RL, Toh S, et al. Trends in the use of antiepileptic drugs among pregnant women in the US, 2001–2007: a medication exposure in pregnancy risk evaluation program study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012; 26: 578–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES