
Keywords: nerve regeneration, vascular cognitive impairment, moyamoya disease, cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, gray matter volume, tract-based spatial statistics, single-photon emission computed tomography, neural regeneration
Abstract
Moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease are both chronic ischemic diseases with similar presentations of vascular cognitive impairment. The aim of the present study was to investigate the patterns of microstructural damage associated with vascular cognitive impairment in the two diseases. The study recruited 34 patients with moyamoya disease (age 43.9 ± 9.2 years; 20 men and 14 women, 27 patients with cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease (age: 44.6 ± 7.6 years; 17 men and 10 women), and 31 normal controls (age 43.6 ± 7.3 years; 18 men and 13 women) from Huashan Hospital of Fudan University in China. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination, long-term delayed recall of Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Trail Making Test Part B, and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Single-photon emission-computed tomography was used to examine cerebral perfusion. Voxel-based morphometry and tract-based spatial statistics were performed to identify regions of gray matter atrophy and white matter deterioration in patients and normal controls. The results demonstrated that the severity of cognitive impairment was similar between the two diseases in all tested domains. Patients with moyamoya disease and those with cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease suffered from disturbed supratentorial hemodynamics. Gray matter atrophy in bilateral middle cingulate cortex and parts of the frontal gyrus was prominent in both diseases, but in general, was more severe and more diffuse in those with moyamoya disease. White matter deterioration was significant for both diseases in the genu and body of corpus callosum, in the anterior and superior corona radiation, and in the posterior thalamic radiation, but in moyamoya disease, it was more diffuse and more severe. Vascular cognitive impairment was associated with regional microstructural damage, with a potential link between, gray and white matter damage. Overall, these results provide insight into the pathophysiological nature of vascular cognitive impairment. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board in Huashan Hospital, China (approval No. 2014-278). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on December 2, 2014 with the identifier NCT02305407.
Chinese Library Classification No. R445; R741
Introduction
Vascular cognitive impairment represents the entire spectrum of cognitive impairments associated with vascular pathology, ranging from mild cognitive impairment to fully developed dementia (Gorelick et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2012a). Deficits in executive function/attention are regarded as hallmarks of vascular cognitive impairment and have been related to chronic deficiencies in frontal blood flow (O’Brien et al., 2003; Hachinski et al., 2006). In our previous studies, we characterized the neuropsychological, hemodynamic, and structural changes of early stage vascular cognitive impairment (Cao et al., 2010; Lei et al., 2016). However, the details regarding microstructural damage in vascular cognitive impairment remain unclear.
Moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease are both chronic progressive cerebrovascular steno-occlusive diseases that are commonly reported in the field of vascular cognitive impairment with prolonged cerebral hypoperfusion (Weinberg et al., 2011; Marshall et al., 2014). In cases of both adult moyamoya disease and adult cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, vascular cognitive impairment has been documented as the consequence of ischemic damage that resulted from dynamic factors such as cerebral hypoperfusion rather than to abnormal brain structure (Bos et al., 2012; Karzmark et al., 2012). Thus, studies of moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease offer us a good chance to understand the characteristics of vascular cognitive impairment.
Although the two diseases share similar clinical vascular cognitive impairment features, the etiology and pathogenesis of their vascular cognitive impairments are apparently different. Vascular cognitive impairment in moyamoya disease is associated with an inflammatory process of the central nervous system and is characterized by the development of collateral vessels that compensate for the significant narrowing of the basal vasculature (Soriano et al., 2002; Kazumata et al., 2015). In contrast, vascular cognitive impairment in cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease is associated with both calcified atherosclerotic plaque lesions and arterial intima-media thickness, irrespective of demographic characteristics or major vascular risk factors (van Oijen et al., 2007; Bos et al., 2012; Wendell et al., 2012; Reis et al., 2013). Additionally, compared with cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, cerebral blood flow in moyamoya disease is reported to be both relatively centrally preserved and consistently high in all supratentorial regions (Obara et al., 1997; Schubert et al., 2014).
Focal atrophy of the cerebral cortex is reported to be caused by chronic regional hemodynamic disturbances and contribute to the development of vascular cognitive impairment (Wendell et al., 2012; Lei et al., 2016). Additionally, cerebral white matter is highly vulnerable to ischemia (Pantoni et al., 1996; Vermeer et al., 2003), and the Wallerian degeneration of axons projecting from cortical regions related to cognitive performance is another proposed mechanism underlying vascular cognitive impairment (Balucani and Silvestrini, 2011; Calviere et al., 2012). To the best of our knowledge, few reports have evaluated these two major diseases that include vascular cognitive impairment, particularly in terms of their respective microstructural damage. Based on a recent study that compared perfusion patterns in moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease (Schubert et al., 2014), we hypothesize that the spatial patterns of microstructural damage in these two diseases are similar to their perfusion patterns. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pattern of microstructural damage in vascular cognitive impairment by comparing the two diseases, thus helping us better understand the pathophysiology of vascular cognitive impairment.
Participants and Methods
Participants
Thirty-four adult patients with moyamoya disease and twenty-seven patients with cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease were consecutively enrolled at the department of neurosurgery between May and August 2013 and matched for demographic characteristics. Patients were diagnosed based on digital subtraction angiography and in accordance with published guidelines (Research Committee on the Pathology and Treatment of Spontaneous Occlusion of the Circle of Willis and Health Labour Sciences Research Grant for Research on Measures for Infractable Diseases, 2012). All participants were Chinese nationals aged 18–60 years, right-handed, with no evidence of infarct in the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, brainstem, cerebellum, or any intracerebral hemorrhage. Participants with cysts in their cerebral subcortical white or with small spots of hyperintense signals smaller than an arbitrary cutoff of 8 mm on T2 images were included (Hachinski et al., 2006; Lei et al., 2016). Patients with extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion were excluded from the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group, and patients with only unilateral vascular damage were ruled out from both groups to keep them more comparable. Through advertisements, we also recruited 31 normal controls with matching demographic features from the Shanghai community in China. Control participants were without cerebrovascular disease, as determined by magnetic resonance angiography. All patients received standard anti-platelets before being enrolled in the study. Participants were excluded if they exhibited significant neurological or psychiatric disorders, had severe systemic diseases, or presented with uncontrolled vascular risk factors that could affect cognition, such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, drug abuse, or alcoholism. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of all patients were assessed by two qualified neurosurgeons.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board in Huashan Hospital, China (approval No. 2014-278) (Additional file 1 (503.5KB, pdf) ) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants or their legal guardians provided informed consent. The trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov on December 2, 2014 (identifier NCT02304507) and the protocol version number is 1.0. A flowchart of the study is shown in Figure 1. This study follows the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidance (Additional file 2).
Figure 1.

Flow chart for the study.
MMD: Moyamoya disease; CAD: cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease; SPECT: single-photo emission computed tomography.
STROBE Statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies
| Item No | Recommendation | |
|---|---|---|
| Title and abstract | 1 | (a) Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title or the abstract √ |
| (b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found √ | ||
| Introduction | ||
| Background/rationale | 2 | Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being reported√ |
| Objectives | 3 | State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses √ |
| Methods | ||
| Study design | 4 | Present key elements of study design early in the paper √ |
| Setting | 5 | Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data collection√ |
| Participants | 6 | (a) Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of selection of participants√ |
| Variables | 7 | Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if applicable√ |
| Data sources/measurement | 8* | For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of assessment (measurement). Describe comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group√ |
| Bias | 9 | Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias √ |
| Study size | 10 | Explain how the study size was arrived at N/A |
| Quantitative variables | 11 | Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, describe which groupings were chosen and why √ |
| Statistical methods | 12 | (a) Describe all statistical methods, including those used to control for confounding √ |
| (b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions NA | ||
| (c) Explain how missing data were addressed N/A | ||
| (d) If applicable, describe analytical methods taking account of sampling strategy√ | ||
| (e) Describe any sensitivity analyses NA | ||
| Results | ||
| Participants | 13* | (a) Report numbers of individuals at each stage of study—eg numbers potentially eligible, examined for eligibility, confirmed eligible, included in the study, completing follow-up, and analysed √ |
| (b) Give reasons for non-participation at each stage NA | ||
| (c) Consider use of a flow diagram √ | ||
| Descriptivedata | 14* | (a) Give characteristics of study participants (eg demographic, clinical, social) and information on exposures and potential confounders√ |
| (b) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of interest N/A | ||
| Outcome data | 15* | Report numbers of outcome events or summary measures√ |
| Main results | 16 | (a) Give unadjusted estimates and, if applicable, confounder-adjusted estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence interval). Make clear which confounders were adjusted for and why they were included √ |
| (b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were categorized NA | ||
| (c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute risk for a meaningful time period NA | ||
| Other analyses | 17 | Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, and sensitivity analysesNA |
| Discussion | ||
| Key results | 18 | Summarise key results with reference to study objectives √ |
| Limitations | 19 | Discuss limitations of the study, taking into account sources of potential bias or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential bias √ |
| Interpretation | 20 | Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations,multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other relevant evidence √ |
| Generalisability | 21 | Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results √ |
| Other information | ||
| Funding | 22 | Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study and, if applicable, for the original study on which the present article is based √ |
*Give information separately for exposed and unexposed groups.
Note: An Explanation and Elaboration article discusses each checklist item and gives methodological background and published examples of transparent reporting. The STROBE checklist is best used in conjunction with this article (freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine at http://www.plosmedicine.org/, Annals of Internal Medicine at http://www.annals.org/, and Epidemiology at http://www.epidem.com/). Information on the STROBE Initiative is available at www.strobe-statement.org.
Neuropsychological assessment
An eligible neuropsychologist who was blinded to the patient diagnoses administered the neuropsychological tests. Global cognitive state was evaluated with the Mini-Mental State Examination (Chua et al., 2018). Additionally, long-term delayed recall results from long-term delayed recall of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test was used to assess episodic memory (Zhao et al., 2012b). The Trail Making Test Part B and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test were used to assess attention/executive function (Lu and Bigler, 2002; Wei et al., 2018). Specific cognitive assessment methods have been explained in detail in previous studies (Lei et al., 2014, 2016, 2017a, b).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
An experienced technician, unaware of the study’s purpose, performed the MRI scans. All MRI scans were performed on a 3.0 Tesla scanner (GE Healthcare, GE Asian Hub, Shanghai, China) using a 32-channel intraoperative head coil. The diffusion-weighted images were acquired using a single-shot spin-echo planar imaging sequence with the following parameters: 43 interleaved contiguous axial slices, slice thickness = 1.5 mm, repetition time = 8600 ms, flip angle = 90°, field of view = 270 × 270 mm2, matrix size = 128 × 128, number of excitations = 1, 30 diffusion-weighted volumes with non-collinear directions (b = 1000 s/mm2), and five non-diffusion-weighted volumes (b = 0 s/mm2). Total acquisition time was approximately 15 minutes.
Image preprocessing
Patterns of gray matter atrophy
To investigate differences in gray matter atrophy among the three groups, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was carried out on all structural images using the VBM8 tool kit (http://dbm.neuro.uni-jena.de) for Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) in the MATLAB environment (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States). Preprocessing steps included: (1) normalizing the anatomical images using a high-dimensional nonlinear diffeomorphic registration algorithm by DARTEL to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template in 1.5 mm cubic resolution; (2) segmenting the spatially normalized images into gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid; (3) smoothing the images with an 8-mm Gaussian kernel; (4) calculating the whole-brain gray matter volume for each group.
Patterns of white matter deterioration
Diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) data were examined for artifacts and signal dropout before pre-processing using the FMRIB Software Library view. High-quality DTI data were corrected according to the following criteria. FMRIB Software Library version 5.0 (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) was used for pre-processing. First, each participant’s original data were corrected for eddy-current distortions and head motions using the eddy-correct command in FMRIB’s Diffusion Toolbox. The correction was carried out by registering the individual volumes to the b0 images. Next, the skull was removed from the b0 image using the Brain Extraction Tool (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/BET) (Smith, 2002) and the corresponding brain mask was applied to the eddy-corrected diffusion-weighted images. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) of each voxel were calculated using the ‘dtifit’ command in FMRIB’s Diffusion Toolbox.
Tract-based spatial statistics were applied to the FA and MD values using FMRIB’s Diffusion Toolbox to investigate white matter integrity and diffusion characteristics. Individual FA images were registered non-linearly to the FMRIB58 template in MNI space and then averaged over all individuals to generate a mean FA image. Next, a study-specific FA skeleton was created from the generated mean FA map, which represented the core of the white matter tracts for all participants. The FA values were thresholded at 0.2 to avoid including any gray matter. Each subject’s FA and MD images were projected onto this skeleton. The between-group difference was examined using FMRIB Software Library’s permutation tool (1000 permutations) with the inclusion of gender and age as covariates, and a cluster significance level of P < 0.05, corrected with threshold-free cluster enhancement.
Evaluation of hemodynamic status
Single-photon emission-computed tomography/CT (Siemens, Symbia T16, Erlangen, Germany) was used to evaluate perfusion values in each brain region. Patients relaxed in the Oblique position, closing their eyes in a dark and quiet room for 30 minutes, and single-photon emission-computed tomography/CT scans were obtained after an intravenous injecting 1480 MBq of 99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer (Neurolite, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharma). Data were collected into a 128 × 128 matrix through a 360° rotation at steps of 2.8° for 80,000 counts per view. Filtered back-projection was employed using ordered subset-expectation materialization for reconstructing the images. Quantification of ach brain-perfusion single-photon emission-computed tomography/CT study was accomplished using the NeuroGam software package (Segami Corporation). This software applies AFNI anatomical coregistration through blocks of data defined in the Talairach space. The acquisition time for single-photon emission computed tomography/CT was 30 minutes.
Specific tracer-uptake ratios were bilaterally assessed for the region of interests in four consecutive transverse slices with highest radioactivity, and the arithmetic mean of these four slices was calculated. The cerebellums served as the reference regions and were drawn in the same way on two consecutive transverse slices. The specific tracer-uptake ratio was calculated as target divided by cerebellum, where the target represented bilateral frontal lobe, parietal lobe, occipital lobe, or thalamus.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis and database management were performed using SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences among groups were tested via one-way analysis of variance, Fisher’s exact test, and Kruskal-Wallis rank test, while post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction were used for further comparisons. Significance was set at P < 0.05.
Voxel-wise comparison was carried out on gray matter volumes using SPM8. Results were assessed at P < 0.05/3 (FDR corrected) for multiple comparisons. Skeletonized FA and MD maps were analyzed via group comparison. Voxel-wise statistics was performed across participants using Randomise, a FMRIB Software Library tool for nonparametric permutation. A null distribution was built for each contrast based on 5000 random permutations. Threshold-free cluster enhancement with corrected P < 0.05/3 was used in the comparison (Hua et al., 2008). For visualization purposes, tracts were dilated using the “tbss-fill” command from the FMRIB Software Library. Regions in major white matter tracts that exhibited significant changes in FA and MD were later defined using the John Hopkins University white matter atlases in MNI space (Wakana et al., 2007; Avelar et al., 2015).
Results
Demographic, neuropsychological, and hemodynamic features for patients with moyamoya disease or cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease and for normal controls
Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The three groups did not show significant differences in age, sex, education level, or controlled vascular risk factors, except for treated for hypercholesterolemia (F = 1.222; P < 0.05). Further, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores did not differ between the two patient groups (moyamoya disease vs. cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease: 1.5 ± 1.8 vs. 1.8 ± 1.7; z = 0.676, P = 0.499).
Table 1.
Demographic and neuropsychological features for patients and normal controls
| Index | MMD (n = 34) | CAD (n = 27) | Normal controls (n = 31) | F/χ2 value (P value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 43.9±9.2 | 44.6±7.6 | 43.6±7.3 | 0.528(0.768) |
| Men | 20(58.8) | 17(63.0) | 18(58.1) | 0.165(0.921) |
| Education (years) | 8.7±5.1 | 9.7±3.9 | 9.4±4.0 | 0.933(0.627) |
| Treated hypertension | 11(32.4) | 12(44.4) | 10(32.3) | 1.222(0.543) |
| Treated hypercholesterolemia | 10(29.4) | 23(85.2) | 7(22.6) | (< 0.001)a |
| Treated diabetes | 5(14.7) | 7(25.9) | 3(9.7) | (0.257)a |
| Smoking | 12(35.3) | 11(40.7) | 9(29.0) | 0.878(0.645) |
| Cognitive status | ||||
| MMSE | 25.3±3.8 | 26.4±2.1 | 28.2±1.7 | 14.738(0.006)b |
| AVLT-LR | 3.2±2.6 | 4.1±2.8 | 6.2±2.8 | 9.96(< 0.001) |
| TMT-B (seconds) | 178.2±58.3 | 161.6±60.0 | 119.0±37.3 | 16.447(< 0.001)b |
| SDMT | 26.8±14.3 | 32.4±13.7 | 43.1±9.3 | 24.138(< 0.001)b |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD for age, education, and cognitive status assessment results, and number (percent) in other indices, aFisher’s exact test. bKruskal-Wallis rank test. MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; AVLT-LR: long-term delayed recall of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (a 20-minute delay time); TMT: Trail Making Test; TMT-B: time of TMT Part B; SDMT: Symbol Digit Modalities Test; MMD: moyamoya disease; CAD: cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease.
Significant group differences were found for Mini-Mental State Examination (F = 14.738; P = 0.006), long-term delayed recall of Auditory Verbal Learning Test (F = 9.96; P < 0.001), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (F = 16.447; P < 0.001), and The Trail Making Test Part B scores (F = 24.138; P < 0.001). Further analysis indicated that patients with moyamoya disease performed significantly worse than normal controls on the Mini-Mental State Examination (z = 3.375, P < 0.001), long-term delayed recall of Auditory Verbal Learning Test (P < 0.001), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (z = 4.555, P < 0.001), and The Trail Making Test Part B (z = 3.953, P < 0.001). Similarly, patients with cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease performed significantly worse than normal controls on the Mini-Mental State Examination (z = 3.307, P < 0.001), long-term delayed recall of Auditory Verbal Learning Test (P = 0.015), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (z = 3.613, P < 0.001), and The Trail Making Test Part B (z = 2.801, P = 0.005). However, no significant differences were found between the two patient groups on any of these neuropsychological tests.
Both moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group demonstrated lower perfusion in supratentorial regions compared with the control group. Post hoc analysis showed lower perfusion in the thalamus of the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group than in the control group, but the difference was not significant. The hemodynamic features among the three groups showed a moyamoya disease < cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease < controls pattern for all brain regions except the left occipital lobe (Table 2).
Table 2.
Hemodynamic differences among patients and normal controls
| MMD | CAD | Normal controls | P value | Adjusted P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal controls vs. MMD patients | Normal controls vs. CAD patients | MMD patients vs. CAD patients | |||||
| Left frontal cortex | 0.82±0.03 | 0.86±009 | 0.98±0.06 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.009 | 0.335 |
| Right frontal cortex | 0.84±0.13 | 0.87±0.11 | 0.98±0.09 | 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.09 |
| Left parietal cortex | 0.91±0.13 | 0.92±0.10 | 1.05±0.08 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.941 |
| Right parietal cortex | 0.87±0.13 | 0.93±0.11 | 1.05±0.11 | 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.136 |
| Left temporal cortex | 0.83±0.11 | 0.84±0.09 | 0.93±0.06 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.597 |
| Right temporal cortex | 0.83±0.11 | 0.87±0.10 | 0.96±0.08 | 0.007 | 0.002 | 0.029 | 0.232 |
| Left occipital cortex | 1.07±0.15 | 1.07±0.10 | 1.13±0.09 | 0.262 | 0.11 | 0.187 | 0.765 |
| Right occipital cortex | 0.84±0.13 | 0.87±0.11 | 0.98±0.09 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.247 | 0.063 |
| Left thalamus | 0.80±0.15 | 0.87±0.10 | 0.96±0.08 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.683 | 0.028 |
| Right thalamus | 0.79±0.14 | 0.91±0.06 | 0.93±0.11 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.644 | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as the tracer uptake radio (mean ± SD; one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni post hoc test). MMD: Moyamoya disease; CAD: cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease.
Gray matter atrophy patterns among moyamoya disease patients, cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease patients, and normal controls
Differences in gray matter volume among the three groups are highlighted in Figure 2 (corrected P < 0.05/3). Compared with controls, the moyamoya disease group exhibited widespread loss of gray matter volume, particularly in the frontal cortex (bilateral middle frontal gyrus, middle cingulate cortex, left superior frontal gyrus, and left orbitofrontal gyrus). Compared with controls, the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group exhibited significantly lower gray matter volume in the frontal cortex (particularly in left medial superior frontal gyrus and bilateral middle cingulate cortex) and the parietal cortex (left superior parietal gyrus). Interestingly, the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group presented a pattern of gray matter atrophy in the medial part of the brain.
Figure 2.

Comparison of gray matter volume (MRI T1) among patients and normal controls.
(A) Gray matter volume (GMV) reduction in MMD compared with controls; (B) GMV reduction in CAD compared with NC; (C) GMV reduction in MMD compared with CAD; (D) GMV reduction in CAD compared with MMD. Significance threshold set at FDR-corrected P < 0.05/3. Colored bars represent Z values. GMV: Gray matter volume; MMD: moyamoya disease; CAD: cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease; NC: normal controls; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; MOG: middle occipital gyrus; SFG: superior frontal gyrus; OFG: orbitofrontal gyrus; mSFG: medial superior frontal gyrus; SPG: superior parietal gyrus; MCC: middle cingulate cortex; PCu: precuneus; IG: insular gyrus.
Gray matter volume was significantly less in the moyamoya disease group than in the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group for the left superior frontal gyrus, left middle frontal gyrus, and left precuneus. In contrast, gray matter volume was significantly less in the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group than in the moyamoya disease group for the left medial superior frontal gyrus and bilateral insular gyrus (Table 3).
Table 3.
Z-statistical maps of gray matter volume differences among patients and normal controls
| Brain regions | Volume (mm3) | MNI coordinates (mm) | Maximum Z | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
| NC vs. MMD | Right middle frontal gyrus | 3834 | 30 | 51 | 33 | 5.937 |
| Left middle frontal gyrus | 7614 | –30 | 45 | 27 | 5.767 | |
| Left middle cingulate cortex | 1728 | –9 | –3 | 39 | 5.204 | |
| Right middle cingulate cortex | 1476 | 9 | 0 | 36 | 5.126 | |
| Left superior frontal gyrus | 4482 | –21 | –6 | 60 | 4.854 | |
| Left orbitofrontal gyrus | 1746 | –18 | 60 | –12 | 4.478 | |
| Left middle occipital gyrus | 1332 | –24 | –72 | 30 | 4.465 | |
| Right middle occipital gyrus | 2205 | 36 | –78 | 27 | 4.140 | |
| Right middle temporal gyrus | 1935 | 48 | –27 | –6 | 4.074 | |
| NC vs. CAD | Left medial superior frontal gyrus | 7911 | –9 | 60 | 12 | 5.333 |
| Left superior parietal gyrus | 1539 | –18 | –69 | 45 | 5.074 | |
| Right middle cingulate cortex | 2592 | 12 | 6 | 42 | 4.885 | |
| Left middle cingulate cortex | 2061 | –3 | –42 | 54 | 3.801 | |
| CAD vs. MMD | Left superior frontal gyrus | 1512 | –18 | 9 | 60 | 4.451 |
| Left middle frontal gyrus | 1323 | –33 | 39 | 21 | 4.340 | |
| Left precuneus | 792 | –9 | –66 | 57 | 3.606 | |
| MMD vs. CAD | Left medial superior frontal gyrus | 2025 | –3 | 60 | 9 | 3.937 |
| Right insular gyrus | 1242 | 45 | 0 | –6 | 3.598 | |
| Left insular gyrus | 729 | –42 | –6 | –3 | 3.525 | |
x, y, z: Peak MNI coordinates; Z: statistical value for the voxel showing peak gray matter volume differences among groups (adjusted for age and sex, corrected P < 0.05/3). MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute; NC: normal control; MMD: moyamoya disease; CAD: cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease.
White matter deterioration patterns among moyamoya disease patients, cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease patients, and normal controls
We further looked for white matter deterioration patterns in the two patient groups (Figure 3; corrected P < 0.05/3; threshold-free cluster enhancement). Compared with controls, FA was significantly lower and MD was significantly higher throughout widespread white matter tracts in the moyamoya disease group. Lower FA was observed in the genu, body, and splenium of the corpus callosum, the internal and external capsule, anterior and superior corona radiation, cingulum, superior longitudinal fasciculus, and a portion of the posterior thalamic radiation. Higher MD was more extensive in the same white matter tracts. No regions of significantly higher FA or significantly lower MD were found in the moyamoya disease group.
Figure 3.
Tract-based spatial statistical analysis (Montreal Neurological Institute diffusion-tensor imaging) of FA decrease and MD increase among patients and normal controls.
(A) FA decrease (red); (B) MD increase (purple). Demographic variables were controlled for and results are overlaid on the MNI152 template and the mean diffusion tensor imaging metrics skeleton (green). Significance: corrected P < 0.05/3; threshold-free cluster enhancement. ACR: Anterior corona radiate; BCC: body of corpus callosum; SCC: splenium of the corpus callosum; PTR: posterior thalamic radiation; CGC: cingulum; EC: external capsule; GCC: genu of corpus callosum; IC: internal capsule; SLF: superior longitudinal fasciculus; SCR: superior corona radiate; NC: normal controls; FA: Fractional anisotropy; MD: mean diffusivity; MMD: moyamoya disease; CAD: cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease.
Similarly, we found that FA was significantly lower and MD was significantly higher in the central part of the white matter tracts in the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group compared with controls, including a portion of the genu and body of corpus callosum, cingulum, posterior thalamic radiation, anterior corona radiata, and part of superior corona radiata. Higher MD was more extensive in these same white matter tracts. In addition, higher MD was also found in the bilateral internal and external capsule of the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group. FA was not higher in the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group than in controls, nor was MD lower (Tables 4 and 5).
Table 4.
Permutation test for differences in fractional anisotropy among patients and normal controls
| Cluster | Volume (mm3) | MNI coordinates (mm) | P | Anatomical region | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | |||||
| NC vs. MMD | 1 | 7529 | 42 | –6 | –16 | < 0.05/3 | Genu of corpus callosum |
| Internal capsule | |||||||
| External capsule | |||||||
| Splenium of the corpus callosum | |||||||
| Posterior thalamic radiation | |||||||
| 2 | 786 | –30 | –60 | –4 | < 0.05/3 | Anterior corona radiate | |
| Cingulum | |||||||
| Body of corpus callosum | |||||||
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus | |||||||
| 3 | 279 | 26 | –58 | 38 | < 0.05/3 | Left superior corona radiate | |
| NC vs. CAD | 1 | 3041 | 8 | –26 | 4 | < 0.05/3 | Genu of corpus callosum |
| Left anterior corona radiate | |||||||
| Right posterior thalamic radiation | |||||||
| 2 | 789 | 14 | 48 | 26 | < 0.05/3 | Body of corpus callosum | |
| Cingulum | |||||||
| 3 | 247 | –24 | –44 | 46 | < 0.05/3 | Left superior corona radiate | |
| CAD vs. MMD | 1 | 237 | –32 | –20 | 54 | < 0.05/3 | Left superior corona radiate |
| Left superior longitudinal fasciculus | |||||||
Results are bilateral unless a hemisphere is specified. x, y, z: Peak coordinates in MNI space. MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute; MMD: moyamoya disease; CAD: cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease; NC: normal control.
Table 5.
Permutation test for differences in mean diffusivity among patients and normal controls
| Cluster | Volume (mm3) | MNI coordinates (mm) | P | Anatomical region | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | |||||
| NC vs. MMD | 1 | 6431 | 43 | –10 | –15 | < 0.05/3 | Genu of corpus callosum |
| Internal capsule | |||||||
| External capsule | |||||||
| Splenium of the corpus callosum | |||||||
| Anterior corona radiate | |||||||
| Posterior thalamic radiation | |||||||
| 2 | 783 | –29 | –63 | –5 | < 0.05/3 | Superior corona radiate | |
| Cingulum | |||||||
| Body of corpus callosum | |||||||
| Superior longitudinal fasciculus | |||||||
| 3 | 280 | 27 | –60 | 42 | < 0.05/3 | Superior corona radiate | |
| NC vs. CAD | 1 | 3022 | 9 | –39 | 5 | < 0.05/3 | Genu of corpus callosum |
| Anterior corona radiate | |||||||
| External capsule | |||||||
| Internal capsule | |||||||
| 2 | 801 | 16 | 50 | 29 | < 0.05/3 | Body of corpus callosum | |
| Anterior corona radiate | |||||||
| 3 | Left superior corona radiate | ||||||
| CAD vs. MMD | 1 | 312 | –26 | –26 | 67 | < 0.05/3 | Anterior corona radiate |
| Posterior thalamic radiation | |||||||
| 2 | 214 | 24 | 16 | 48 | < 0.05/3 | Superior longitudinal fasciculus | |
Results are bilateral unless a hemisphere is specified. x, y, z: Peak coordinates in MNI space. MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute; MMD: moyamoya disease; CAD: cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease; NC: normal control.
The white matter damage was more diffuse and severe in the moyamoya disease group than in the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group. In particular, FA was significantly lower in the moyamoya disease group in parts of the anterior and superior corona radiata and in the superior longitudinal fasciculus. Moreover, higher MD was primarily found in part of the anterior corona radiata, posterior thalamic radiation, and superior longitudinal fasciculus. In contrast, the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group did not exhibit any significantly lower FA or any significantly higher MD than the moyamoya disease group (Tables 4 and 5).
Discussion
To date, with increasing reports of cognitive impairment in patients with chronic cerebrovascular diseases, the diagnoses and treatments of vascular cognitive impairment are becoming more of a concern (Gorelick et al., 2011; Kazumata et al., 2015; Meng et al., 2017; He et al., 2018; Weinstein, 2018). However, most published studies of vascular cognitive impairment are based on only a single disease, making it difficult to discern common vascular cognitive impairment features from individual disease pathophysiology. In the present study, we conducted a cross-sectional neuroimaging analysis of two chronic cerebrovascular diseases commonly reported in the field of vascular cognitive impairment. Results indicated that (1) moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease exhibited supratentorial impaired cerebral perfusion, with greater hypoperfusion in the moyamoya disease group; (2) moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease groups exhibited significant gray matter atrophy in the bilateral middle cingulate cortex and parts of the frontal gyrus, with but the atrophy in the moyamoya disease group being more diffuse and severe; (3) moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease groups showed significant white matter deterioration in the genu and body of corpus callosum, anterior and superior corona radiations, cingulum, and posterior thalamic radiation. White matter deterioration in the moyamoya disease group was more diffuse and severe than that in the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group.
Previous studies have reported structural and functional damage to the frontal cortex caused by hemodynamic disturbances is a major cause of vascular cognitive impairment (Calviere et al., 2012; Lei et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2016; Fang et al., 2016). Additionally, the middle cingulate cortex is reported to be the main hub for the impulse control network. It connects to the frontal regions related to decision making and affects vascular cognitive impairment (Shackman et al., 2011). In the present study, gray matter atrophy was significant in the bilateral middle cingulate cortex and parts of the frontal gyrus in both moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease groups, implying that vascular cognitive impairment might result from regional gray matter atrophy.
While gray matter comprises neuronal cell bodies, white matter is made from the myelinated axons that connect neurons to each other. In this study, white matter tract abnormalities were identified in the genu and body of corpus callosum, the anterior and superior corona radiations, and the posterior thalamic radiation in both moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, indicating that this pattern of damage to white matter tracts might be characteritic of vascular cognitive impairment. The corpus callosum is the largest white matter tract in the brain and plays a vital role in executive function, such as processing speed and problem solving abilities (van Eimeren et al., 2008; Penke et al., 2010). In addition, both the corona radiation and posterior thalamic radiation contain fibers that transfer information between the thalamus and the cerebral cortex. Their common pattern of white matter tract damage may be due to a common hemodynamic disturbance (Schubert et al., 2014).
In the present study, the moyamoya disease group presented a widespread pattern of damage to gray and white matter, while the cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease group presented a more central and medial pattern of damage. This implies a potential link between gray matter and white matter damage. There are two possible explanations. First, neuronal cell bodies and axons are parts of the same cell, and physiological and anatomical studies show that they often are impaired together under pathological conditions. For example, when white matter tracts deteriorate after demyelination, the signal conduction along the nerve is impaired, which leads to withering of the nerve and somatic atrophy. Kazumata et al. (2015) also noted a positive link between focally damaged gray and white matter in another MDD study. Subsequently, chronic hemodynamic deficiencies, inflammation, and other factors lead to unique collateral and microstructural damage in MDD and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease (Masuda et al., 1993; Vermeer et al., 2003; Bos et al., 2012; Blecharz et al., 2017). Furthermore, Schubert et al. (2014) also noticed territory-specific patterns of cerebral blood flow in a previous study comparing the two diseases. Thus, we speculated that vascular cognitive impairment is a heterogeneous complication and a consequence of both hemodynamic compromise and other coexisting disruptive factors.
In addition to describing the cognitive impairment of moyamoya disease and cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, this study is particularly interested in establishing a methodology for detecting and monitoring disease progression in future studies of this particular patient population. Moreover, the data presented in this study can be used as a good cornerstone for monitoring the efficacy of surgical revascularization (Amin-Hanjani and Charbel, 2006).
Some limitations of this study should be considered. Primarily, the present study excluded patients with obvious structural abnormalities or early stage vascular cognitive impairment (Reis et al., 2013; Kazumata et al., 2015). Moreover, the small sample size limits the statistical power. Finally, tract-based spatial statistics and VBM analysis can only do group comparisons, but cannot do individual analysis. Additionally, it is technically difficult to balance type-I and type-II errors in terms of what corrective methods are used in the VBM analysis.
Taken together, the present study provides valuable information about the spatial patterns of microstructural damage in vascular cognitive impairment by comparing two chronic cerebrovascular diseases. Future studies are needed to explore the relationship between microstructural damage and cognitive performance in vascular cognitive impairment patients.
Additional files:
Additional file 1: (503.5KB, pdf) Ethical review approval (Chinese).
Additional file 2: STROBE checklist.
Additional file 3: Open peer review report 1 (122.6KB, pdf) .
Acknowledgments:
We thank Professor Fady Charbel from University of Illinois, USA for his revision of the article, and Dr. Ping He from Fudan University, China for his assistance in statistical analysis.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: There is no conflict of interest.
Financial support: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81771237 (to YXG); the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program), No. 2014CB541604 (to YXG); the “Shu Guang” Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation, China, No. 16SG02 (to LC); the Scientific Research Project of Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, China, No. 2016QD082 (to YL). The conception, design, execution, and analysis of experiments, as well as the preparation of and decision to publish this manuscript, were made independent of any funding organization.
Institutional review board statement: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board in Huashan Hospital, China (approval No. 2014-278). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Declaration of participant consent: The authors certify that they have obtained consent forms from the participants or their legal guardians. In the forms, the participants or their legal guardians have given consent for the participant images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The participants or their legal guardians understand that the participants’ names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity.
Reporting statement: This study followed the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidance.
Biostatistics statement: The statistical methods of this study were reviewed by the biostatistician of Huashan Hospital of Fudan University in China.
Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.
Data sharing statement: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be shared. Study protocol, informed consent form and clinical study report will be promulgated within 6 months after the completion of the trial. Anonymized trial data will be available indefinitely at www.figshare.com.
Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.
Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.
Open peer reviewer: Rodolfo Gabriel Gatto, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81771237 (to YXG); the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program), No. 2014CB541604 (to YXG); the “Shu Guang” Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation, China, No. 16SG02 (to LC); the Scientific Research Project of Huashan Hospital of Fudan University of China, No. 2016QD082 (to YL).
P-Reviewer: Gatto RG; C-Editor: Zhao M; S-Editors: Yu J, Li CH; L-Editors: Qiu Y, Song LP; T-Editor: Liu XL
References
- 1.Amin-Hanjani S, Charbel FT. Is extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery effective in certain patients? Neurol Clin. 2006;24:729–743. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2006.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Avelar white matter, D’Abreu A, Coan AC, Lima FO, Guimaraes R, Yassuda CL, Oliveira GP, Guillaumon AT, Filho AA, Min LL, Cendes F. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis is associated with gray and white matter damage. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:1197–1203. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Balucani C, Silvestrini M. Carotid atherosclerotic disease and cognitive function: mechanisms identifying new therapeutic targets. Int J Stroke. 2011;6:368–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00628.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blecharz KG, Frey D, Schenkel T, Prinz V, Bedini G, Krug SM, Czabanka M, Wagner J, Fromm M, Bersano A, Vajkoczy P. Autocrine release of angiopoietin-2 mediates cerebrovascular disintegration in Moyamoya disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:1527–1539. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16658301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bos D, Vernooij MW, Elias-Smale SE, Verhaaren BF, Vrooman HA, Hofman A, Niessen WJ, Witteman JC, van der Lugt A, Ikram MA. Atherosclerotic calcification relates to cognitive function and to brain changes on magnetic resonance imaging. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8:S104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Calviere L, Ssi Yan Kai G, Catalaa I, Marlats F, Bonneville F, Larrue V. Executive dysfunction in adults with moyamoya disease is associated with increased diffusion in frontal white matter. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83:591–593. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cao X, Guo Q, Zhao Q, Jin L, Fu J, Hong Z. The neuropsychological characteristics and regional cerebral blood flow of vascular cognitive impairment-no dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25:1168–1176. doi: 10.1002/gps.2458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen Y, Wang C, Liang H, Chen H, Bi Y, Sun H, Shi Q, Deng Y, Li J, Wang Y, Zhang Y. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leukoaraiosis-associated subcortical vascular cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study. Neurol Res. 2016;38:510–517. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2016.1177929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chua XY, Choo Rwhite matter, Ha NHL, Cheong CY, Wee SL, Yap PLK. Mapping modified Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores to dementia stages in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000704. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fang L, Huang J, Zhang Q, Chan RC, Wang R, Wan W. Different aspects of dysexecutive syndrome in patients with moyamoya disease and its clinical subtypes. J Neurosurg. 2016;125:299–307. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS142666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gorelick PB, Scuteri A, Black SE, Decarli C, Greenberg SM, Iadecola C, Launer LJ, Laurent S, Lopez OL, Nyenhuis D, Petersen RC, Schneider JA, Tzourio C, Arnett DK, Bennett DA, Chui HC, Higashida RT, Lindquist R, Nilsson PM, Roman GC, et al. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2011;42:2672–2713. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182299496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, Breteler MM, Nyenhuis DL, Black SE, Powers WJ, DeCarli C, Merino JG, Kalaria RN, Vinters HV, Holtzman DM, Rosenberg GA, Wallin A, Dichgans M, Marler JR, Leblanc GG. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke. 2006;37:2220–2241. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000237236.88823.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.He J, Huang Y, Du G, Wang ZQ, Xiang Y, Wang QS. Cognitive impairment and hippocampal alpha-synuclein change in a rat model of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjiu. 2018;22:3230–3236. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hua K, Zhang J, Wakana S, Jiang H, Li X, Reich DS, Calabresi PA, Pekar JJ, van Zijl PC, Mori S. Tract probability maps in stereotaxic spaces: analyses of white matter anatomy and tract-specific quantification. Neuroimage. 2008;39:336–347. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Karzmark P, Zeifert PD, Bell-Stephens TE, Steinberg GK, Dorfman LJ. Neurocognitive impairment in adults with moyamoya disease without stroke. Neurosurgery. 2012;70:634–638. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182320d1a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kazumata K, Tha KK, Narita H, Kusumi I, Shichinohe H, Ito M, Nakayama N, Houkin K. Chronic ischemia alters brain microstructural integrity and cognitive performance in adult moyamoya disease. Stroke. 2015;46:354–360. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lei Y, Li YJ, Guo QH, Liu XD, Liu Z, Ni W, Su JB, Yang H, Jiang HQ, Xu B, Gu YX, Mao Y. Postoperative executive function in adult moyamoya disease: a preliminary study of its functional anatomy and behavioral correlates. J Neurosurg. 2017a;126:527–536. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.JNS151499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lei Y, Su J, Guo Q, Yang H, Gu Y, Mao Y. Regional gray matter atrophy in vascular mild cognitive impairment. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.08.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lei Y, Su J, Jiang H, Guo Q, Ni W, Yang H, Gu Y, Mao Y. Aberrant regional homogeneity of resting-state executive control, default mode, and salience networks in adult patients with moyamoya isease. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017b;11:176–184. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9518-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lei Y, Li Y, Ni W, Jiang H, Yang Z, Guo Q, Gu Y, Mao Y. Spontaneous brain activity in adult patients with moyamoya disease: a resting-state fMRI study. Brain Res. 2014;1546:27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lu L, Bigler ED. Normative data on trail making test for neurologically normal, Chinese-speaking adults. Appl Neuropsychol. 2002;9:219–225. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0904_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marshall RS, Festa JR, Cheung YK, Pavol MA, Derdeyn CP, Clarke WR, Videen TO, Grubb RL, Slane K, Powers WJ, Lazar RM. Randomized Evaluation of Carotid Occlusion and Neurocognition (RECON) trial: main results. Neurology. 2014;82:744–751. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Masuda J, Ogata J, Yutani C. Smooth muscle cell proliferation and localization of macrophages and T cells in the occlusive intracranial major arteries in moyamoya disease. Stroke. 1993;24:1960–1967. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.12.1960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Meng D, Hosseini AA, Simpson RJ, Shaikh Q, Tench CR, Dineen RA, Auer DP. Lesion topography and microscopic white matter tract damage contribute to cognitive impairment in symptomatic carotid artery disease. Radiology. 2017;282:502–515. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.O’Brien JT, Erkinjuntti T, Reisberg B, Roman G, Sawada T, Pantoni L, Bowler JV, Ballard C, DeCarli C, Gorelick PB, Rockwood K, Burns A, Gauthier S, DeKosky ST. Vascular cognitive impairment. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:89–98. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00305-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Obara K, Fukuuchi Y, Kobari M, Watanabe S, Dembo T. Cerebral hemodynamics in patients with moyamoya disease and in patients with atherosclerotic occlusion of the major cerebral arterial trunks. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1997;99(Suppl 2):S86–89. doi: 10.1016/s0303-8467(97)00063-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pantoni L, Garcia JH, Gutierrez JA. Cerebral white matter is highly vulnerable to ischemia. Stroke. 1996;27:1641–1647. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.9.1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Penke L, Munoz Maniega S, Murray C, Gow AJ, Hernandez MC, Clayden JD, Starr JM, Wardlaw JM, Bastin ME, Deary IJ. A general factor of brain white matter integrity predicts information processing speed in healthy older people. J Neurosci. 2010;30:7569–7574. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1553-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Reis JP, Launer LJ, Terry JG, Loria CM, Zeki Al Hazzouri A, Sidney S, Yaffe K, Jacobs DR, Jr, Whitlow CT, Zhu N, Carr JJ. Subclinical atherosclerotic calcification and cognitive functioning in middle-aged adults: the CARDIA study. Atherosclerosis. 2013;231:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Research Committee on the Pathology and Treatment of Spontaneous Occlusion of the Circle of Willis, Health Labour Sciences Research Grant for Research on Measures for Infractable Diseases (2012) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of moyamoya disease (spontaneous occlusion of the circle of Willis) Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 52:245–266. doi: 10.2176/nmc.52.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schubert GA, Czabanka M, Seiz M, Horn P, Vajkoczy P, Thome C. Perfusion characteristics of Moyamoya disease: an anatomically and clinically oriented analysis and comparison. Stroke. 2014;45:101–106. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shackman AJ, Salomons TV, Slagter HA, Fox AS, Winter JJ, Davidson RJ. The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:154–167. doi: 10.1038/nrn2994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17:143–155. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Soriano SG, Cowan DB, Proctor MR, Scott RM. Levels of soluble adhesion molecules are elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of children with moyamoya syndrome. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:544–549. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200203000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.van Eimeren L, Niogi SN, McCandliss BD, Holloway ID, Ansari D. White matter microstructures underlying mathematical abilities in children. Neuroreport. 2008;19:1117–1121. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328307f5c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.van Oijen M, de Jong FJ, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Atherosclerosis and risk for dementia. Ann Neurol. 2007;61:403–410. doi: 10.1002/ana.21073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vermeer SE, Prins ND, den Heijer T, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1215–1222. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wakana S, Caprihan A, Panzenboeck MM, Fallon JH, Perry M, Gollub RL, Hua K, Zhang J, Jiang H, Dubey P, Blitz A, van Zijl P, Mori S. Reproducibility of quantitative tractography methods applied to cerebral white matter. Neuroimage. 2007;36:630–644. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wei M, Shi J, Li T, Ni J, Zhang X, Li Y, Kang S, Ma F, Xie H, Qin B, Fan D, Zhang L, Wang Y, Tian J. Diagnostic accuracy of the Chinese version of the trail-making test for screening cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66:92–99. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Weinberg DG, Rahme RJ, Aoun SG, Batjer HH, Bendok BR. Moyamoya disease: functional and neurocognitive outcomes in the pediatric and adult populations. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;30:E21. doi: 10.3171/2011.3.FOCUS1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Weinstein JD. A new direction for Alzheimer’s research. Neural Regen Res. 2018;13:190–193. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.226381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wendell CR, Waldstein SR, Ferrucci L, O’Brien RJ, Strait JB, Zonderman AB. Carotid atherosclerosis and prospective risk of dementia. Stroke. 2012;43:3319–3324. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.672527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhao H, Li Z, Wang Y, Zhang Q. Hippocampal expression of synaptic structural proteins and phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein in a rat model of vascular dementia induced by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Neural Regen Res. 2012a;7:821–826. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhao Q, Lv Y, Zhou Y, Hong Z, Guo Q. Short-term delayed recall of auditory verbal learning test is equivalent to long-term delayed recall for identifying amnestic mild cognitive mpairment. PLoS One. 2012b;7:e51157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

