Abstract
miRNAs are small RNAs that influence gene expression by targeting mRNAs. Depending on the function of their target genes, miRNAs may regulate the expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressors, thereby contributing to the promotion or inhibition of tumor progression. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), although often diagnosed as breast cancer, is a potential precursor to invasive ductal carcinoma. Many of the genetic events required for the invasive progression of DCIS occur at the preinvasive stage, and these events include changes in the expression of miRNAs. Aberrant expression of miRNAs can influence specific oncogenic or tumor-suppressive pathways required for breast cancer progression. miRNAs in DCIS have been shown to influence hormone signaling, cell–cell adhesion, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, transforming growth factor β signaling, maintenance of cancer stem cells, and modulation of the extracellular matrix. Additionally, extracellular DCIS miRNAs, such as those found in exosomes, may promote invasive progression by modifying the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the miRNAs that have been identified in DCIS and how they may contribute to the progression to invasive disease. We also touch on the current state of miRNA therapy development, including the current challenges, and discuss the key future perspectives for research into miRNA function for the purpose of miRNA therapy development for DCIS.
In the United States, it is estimated that of every eight women, one will be diagnosed with breast cancer. Of those women, about 20% will be diagnosed with the precursor to breast cancer, called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-figures.html, last accessed June 5, 2018). DCIS is defined as an abnormal growth of cells that resemble cancer on pathologic examination but are retained within the ducts of the mammary gland; DCIS is therefore considered a benign lesion. Importantly, a woman diagnosed with DCIS is up to 10-fold more likely to later develop invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).1 However, in about half of these women, this precursor lesion will not progress to IDC, even if untreated.2 This clinical conundrum may lead the oncologist to err on the side of caution, and many women undergo aggressive, and perhaps unnecessary, clinical treatments as though they have been diagnosed with IDC. Therefore, a better understanding of the biology of DCIS progression to IDC is crucial and necessary to identify those that will progress to IDC versus those that will not. This information will provide the crucial missing link for the proper clinical management of DCIS.
Although breast cancer is referred to as a single disease, at least four major molecular subtypes have been identified through gene-expression profiling.3, 4 These subtypes include luminal A, luminal B, triple negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 enriched. Subtyping in the clinical setting is typically approximated by histologic examination of the elevated or reduced levels of certain biomarkers, including the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and the proliferation marker Ki-67. These major subtypes have also been observed in DCIS, although at different frequencies, with 49% identified as luminal A (ER+, Ki-67 low); 8.7%, as luminal B (ER+, PR+, Ki-67 high); 7%, as triple negative (ER−, PR−, HER2–); and 16%, as HER2 enriched (ER−, PR−, HER2+).5, 6 Although these markers are useful for categorizing DCIS, they have limited prognostic value in patients.6
To better understand the genetic events that may drive DCIS progression to invasive disease and to identify the biomarkers of progression, researchers have examined the cellular and molecular changes present in DCIS that may characterize the transition of DCIS to IDC. Despite these efforts, few prognostic markers have been discovered.7 These gene- and expression-profiling studies have found that the genetic characteristics of DCIS are highly similar to those of IDC, especially in patients with synchronous DCIS,8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 with most changes occurring in the transition of normal epithelial cells to DCIS.14, 15, 16, 17 Various theoretical models have been proposed for the initial development and invasive progression of DCIS, based on these studies.18 Mutations common to both IDC and DCIS have been identified in genes that may contribute to invasive progression, with TP53 (35% IDC, 30% DCIS), PIK3CA (34% IDC, 55% DCIS), and GATA3 (9% IDC, 27% DCIS) being the most frequently mutated.19, 20, 21, 22 However, the main drivers of breast cancer progression remain undefined and may be dependent on the intrinsic subtype. Gene-expression patterns in DCIS and IDC vary across the intrinsic subtypes, with luminal tumors largely affected by differential expression of genes in the cell-adhesion and extracellular-matrix pathways, whereas HER2+ tumors are enriched for cell cycle–regulation pathways, and triple-negative tumors are mainly affected by genes involved in the immune response.23
miRNA Biogenesis and Role in Breast Cancer
miRNAs are a class of small regulatory RNAs that function by binding in a sequence-specific manner to the 3′ untranslated region of an mRNA and directing post-transcriptional repression. The biogenesis of miRNAs begins with transcription from a miRNA gene by RNA polymerase II into a primary miRNA. The primary miRNAs are known to form a hairpin loop by the binding of complementary regions. The end of the hairpin is then recognized and processed by the endonuclease Drosha and DiGeorge syndrome chromosome region protein 8 into a 60-nucleotide stem-loop structure called a pre-miRNA, also known as the precursor miRNA. The pre-miRNA is then exported out of the nucleus via exportin 5 and guanosine-5′-triphosphate–binding Ras-related nuclear protein, where it is further processed by Dicer into the mature miRNA. The mature miRNA is loaded into an Argonaute protein with assistance from other chaperone proteins in a complex known as the RNA-induced silencing complex. The RNA-induced silencing complex–associated miRNA is then guided by the seed region (nucleotides 2 to 8) to the complementary seed match site of a target mRNA, to direct post-transcriptional repression or mRNA degradation24 (Figure 1). According to the most recent update of miRBase software version 22 (http://www.miRBase.org)25 there are 1982 human miRNA precursors that produce 2693 mature miRNAs. Importantly, the seed region of any particular miRNA is predicted to target thousands of mRNAs, and each mRNA can have hundreds of miRNA seed match sites within their 3′ untranslated region. Because of this broad regulatory potential, miRNAs are considered the largest class of gene regulators that can fine-tune gene expression26 and influence virtually all developmental processes and diseases.24 In the context of cancer, miRNAs may promote cancer progression through the inhibition of tumor suppressors, or inhibit cancer progression by targeting oncogenes.27 Alterations in miRNAs have been described across many types of cancer, including breast cancer.28, 29 Frequently, global down-regulated miRNA expression in tumors relative to normal tissues is observed. In addition, specific miRNA-expression profiles, identified among various cancer types, can both distinguish specific types of tumor from normal tissue and classify tumors according to their common origin.28, 30, 31 miRNA-profiling studies in breast cancer have continually shown that the distinct miRNA-expression patterns present in IDC are also present in DCIS, thus indicating that deregulation of miRNA expression occurs early on in breast cancer development.17, 29, 32 However, the expression profiles and functions of miRNAs differ among the various subtypes of invasive breast cancer (IBC), and also among the subtypes at the DCIS stage.33, 34, 35
Figure 1.
Canonic miRNA biogenesis and post-transcriptional targeting of mRNAs. The miRNA gene is transcribed by RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II), which then folds back onto itself through complementary binding to form the primary miRNA (pri-miRNA). The ends of the pri-miRNA are then cleaved by the RNA microprocessor complex composed of the RNA endonuclease Drosha and binding partner DiGeorge syndrome chromosome region protein (DGCR)-8 into the pre-miRNA hairpin structure of approximately 60 nucleotides (nt). The pre-miRNA is exported from the nuclease by exportin 5 and guanosine-5′-triphosphate–binding Ras-related nuclear protein (RAN). In the cytoplasm, the precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) is cleaved near the loop by the endonuclease Dicer to form the miRNA duplex of approximately 17 to 20 nt in length and consisting of the mature miRNA and a passenger strand, often referred to as the miRNA star (miRNA*). The mature miRNA is then loaded into the Argonaute protein (AGO) which is part of the RNA-induced silencing complex. The miRNA is then guided to the complementary binding site within the 3′ untranslated region of a target mRNA where post-transcriptional repression activity in the form of mRNA degradation or translational repression occurs.
The overall reduction of expressed miRNAs in breast tumor tissues may be attributed to multiple factors, such as changes in the expression levels of the components of the miRNA-processing machinery or growth hormone signaling. For example, the proteins Dicer and Drosha are both down-regulated in IBC,36 an observation that is also seen in DCIS. The reduction of Dicer expression has been associated with breast cancer progression, particularly in those tumors with reduced hormone receptor expression and of a higher histologic grade, and could independently predict recurrence in the HER2-enriched subtype.37, 38 Likewise, a gradual loss of Drosha has been observed during the progression of DCIS to metastatic cancer and could serve as an independent predictor of outcome in breast cancer patients.39 Approximately 70% of breast cancers are positive for ER expression, and estrogen signaling plays an important role in breast cancer development and treatment (https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-figures.html, last accessed June 5, 2018). The role of estrogen and its effects on miRNA expression have been evaluated in various breast and ovarian cancer cells treated with 17β-estradiol. This treatment resulted in broad repression of the miRNAs required for estrogen-dependent tumor cell growth.40 These studies indicate the significance of general miRNA-expression regulation in breast cancer progression.
Role of miRNAs in DCIS Progression
Although the aberrant expression of miRNAs and their processing machinery in DCIS has been explored, relatively few studies have examined the functional role of miRNAs in the progression of DCIS to IDC. Gene-expression studies in DCIS and IDC have commonly identified genes associated with the pathways involved in cell–cell adhesion, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix. However, the most-affected pathways may vary according to intrinsic subtype, with HER2-enriched tumors frequently having disrupted cell-cycle pathways and basal-like tumors enriched for immune-response pathways.12, 13, 16, 23, 41 Studies examining miRNA function have similarly identified miRNAs that may regulate genes involved in these pathways. The first study to profile the changes in miRNA expression in pre-IBC conducted an integrated mRNA- and miRNA-expression analysis in normal and DCIS tissues. That study identified >100 mRNA:miRNA target pairs involved in several cancer-related pathways, such as cell-cycle regulation, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, and p53 interactions. Several of the target pairs were experimentally validated in breast cancer cell lines in vitro.32 Loss of miR-125b was observed in DCIS tissues compared to normal; overexpression of this putative tumor-suppressor miRNA inhibited the expression of MEMO1, a protein required for HER2-driven cell motility, and the coactivator NRIP1 (alias RIP140), which modulates ER-transcriptional activity.32 miR-182 and -183 were observed to be highly overexpressed in DCIS relative to normal. Inhibition of miR-182 elevated the expression levels of chromobox protein homolog 7 (CBX7), a known oncogene that regulates E-cadherin; docking protein 4 (DOK4), which acts as a scaffold for c-SRC kinase and activates the MAPK pathway; and N-myristoyltransferase (NMT2). The inhibition of miR-183 resulted in elevated expression of the early-response 1 (EGR1), which functions as a transcriptional regulator and potential tumor suppressor.32 Importantly, the de-repression of CBX7, via knockdown of miR-182, resulted in an up-regulation of E-cadherin, a key protein whose loss of function is known to contribute to breast cancer progression. Additional studies have been conducted to validate some of the target pairs identified in this study across various cancer types, indicating that these interactions are highly relevant to neoplastic progression.42, 43, 44
Other studies have examined the expression and function of miRNAs in the context of hormonal receptor signaling, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling, EMT, and cancer stem cells in DCIS and IDC. For example, the let-7 family of miRNAs were found to be down-regulated in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded DCIS and IDC tissues relative to benign and to be inversely correlated with the expression of ER-α. In vitro experiments validated the effect of let-7 overexpression on reducing the signaling activity and expression of ER-α.45 TGF-β signaling plays a complex role in breast cancer progression. TGF-β acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting epithelial cell-cycle progression and promoting apoptosis during the early stages of carcinogenesis, while promoting metastasis in later stages of cancer progression.46 Chen et al47 profiled the miRNA expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin- embedded tissues from normal, atypical ductal hyperplasia, DCIS, and IDC samples. In that study, the expression levels of miR-21, -200b/c, -183, and -141 were consistently increased in atypical ductal hyperplasia, DCIS, and IDC compared to normal, whereas the expression of miR-557 was consistently decreased in DCIS. miRNA target gene prediction and pathway analysis indicated that the oncomiR miR-21 may promote breast cancer progression by regulating TGF-β signaling. miR-21 is known to regulate the TGF-β pathway by repressing the activity of inhibitors of TGF-β signaling, such as SMAD7. Meanwhile, active TGF-β signaling can increase levels of mature miR-21 in a feed-forward loop. Knockdown of miR-21 in breast cancer cell lines can restore the expression of MSH2 and SMAD7, which are both involved in the TGF-β pathway, indicating that miR-21 may play an important role in selectively utilizing the TGF-β pathway during breast cancer initiation and progression.48 Another study identified a crucial role for TGF-β signaling in the tumor microenvironment. In the mammary gland, the luminal epithelial cells, which are the most common cell type of neoplastic origin in the breast, are surrounded by a layer of myoepithelial cells that normally function to maintain luminal cell polarity and the structural integrity of the mammary ductal system. However, the myoepithelial cell layer is progressively lost during tumor development.49 In this study, the relationship of tumor-associated myoepithelial cells with DCIS cells was examined. Under co-culture conditions, the DCIS cells were found to stimulate the myoepithelial cells to secrete TGF-β1, which in return contributed to the activation of the TGF-β/mothers against decapentaplegic homolog pathway and the induction of oncogenic miR-10b-5p, increased EMT, enhanced basal-like phenotypes, induction of stemness, and invasiveness of the DCIS cells. The induction of miR-10b-5p resulted in the down-regulation of its tumor-suppressor target RB1-inducible coiled-coil 1 (RB1CC1), contributing to the invasive progression of DCIS cells.50
EMT is a crucial process for promoting cancer invasion, by reducing intercellular junctions and loss of cell polarity, while enhancing the migratory behavior, resistance to apoptosis, and production of extracellular-matrix components. The miR-200 family (miR-200a-c, -141, and -429) has repeatedly been shown to play an important role in EMT through the regulation of genes involved in this process.51, 52 Up-regulation of the miR-200 family is consistently reported in the early stages of breast cancer development; however, expression is either unchanged or reportedly lost in the transition to invasive cancers.17, 53 For example, miR-200a expression was progressively lost with cancer progression in formalin-fixed, paraffin- embedded tissues from normal, DCIS, to IDC, and in metastatic lymph nodes. miR-200a expression was detected in 95% of normal and 80% of DCIS samples, whereas only 42% and 17% of IDC and metastatic lymph nodes, respectively, were positive for miR-200a expression. In addition, the loss of miR-200a expression was correlated with high histologic grade and perinodal tumor extension.53 These results suggest that the loss of EMT-related miRNA, such as miR-200a, may play an important role in DCIS progression to invasive disease.
Cancer stem cells are a specific group of immortal cells, among the other cancerous cells within the tumor, that can self-renew and sustain tumor growth.54 Studies have shown that DCIS may contain a population of cancer stem cells.55 A miRNA-profiling study in DCIS and matched normal controls showed that 68 miRNAs were dysregulated in DCIS relative to normal.56 miR-140 was found to be among the most consistently down-regulated miRNAs. With the separation of CD44-high/CD24-low DCIS cell subpopulations, which are associated with stemness, miR-140 was significantly down-regulated in cancer stem–like cells compared to normal stem cells. They also identified the stem-cell factors sex-determining region (SR) Y box 9 (SOX9) and aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) as direct targets of miR-140. Increased expression of miR-140 decreased the levels of both SOX9 and ALDH1, and resulted in reduced tumor growth in vivo, demonstrating that miR-140 contributes to the growth and survival of cancer stem cells in DCIS.56 However, whether cancer stem cells may influence the invasive potential of DCIS remains unclear.
More recent differential miRNA-profiling studies have sought to determine the role of miRNAs in DCIS progression. In a study by Li et al,57 miRNA microarray and real-time PCR were utilized to profile miRNAs in 21 DCIS samples and matching normal tissues. They identified miR-10b, -125b, -132, -145, -154-3p, -382-5p, and -409-3p as significantly down-regulated in DCIS relative to normal. Re-expression of miR-132, a potential tumor-suppressor miRNA, inhibited the proliferation and colony-forming ability of breast cancer cells, indicating a potential role for this miRNA in the early stages of breast cancer development.
Intravasation of cancer cells into the small intratumor vessels, known as lymphovascular invasion, is regularly evaluated in pathology reports and may indicate an increased risk for cancer spread.58 Altered miRNA expression in breast cancer cells microdissected from the lymphovascular space, compared to matched DCIS and IBC samples, was recently examined. In that study, the authors identified high expression levels of miR-150, -126, and -155 in IBC and lymphovascular invasion compared to DCIS samples and validated their expression in breast cancer cell lines in vitro. Several target genes of these miRNAs with various roles in cancer progression, including RHOA, a GTPase associated with proliferation and metastasis; PEG10, an inhibitor of TGF-β signaling; and the proto-oncogene MYB, were highly expressed in DCIS relative to IBC and lymphovascular invasion, suggesting a role for these miRNAs in the progression of breast cancer.59
The changes in miRNA expression during breast cancer progression have also been examined in an animal model.60 In that study, both mRNA and miRNA expression were measured at four key time points of breast cancer progression using the polyoma middle T antigen mouse model of luminal B breast cancer. During the entire course of disease progression, 151 miRNAs were differentially regulated, with the number of differentially overexpressed miRNAs increasing along four set time points corresponding to the stages of human breast cancer progression (hyperplasia, adenoma/mammary intraepithelial neoplasia, early carcinoma, and late carcinoma with metastasis). By combining both expression data sets and miRNA target prediction, >10,000 potential miRNA:mRNA interactions were identified. Target gene annotation and pathway analysis found an enrichment for targets involved in cell and focal adhesion, cell migration, angiogenesis, and tight junctions, with the number of targets among these groups increasing with cancer progression. Notably, miRNAs with target genes related to angiogenesis were more active during the early transition of dysplasia to adenoma. Meanwhile, miRNAs with target genes related to proliferation, cell adhesion, differentiation, lipid metabolism, and transmembrane transports were more active in the later stages of early carcinoma to metastasis, and miRNAs with target genes related to Tgf-β signaling showed decreased activity at this time point.60
Role of Extracellular miRNAs in DCIS
Due to the high similarity of expression profiles between DCIS and IBC and the lack of a reliable indicator of the invasive process, it has been suggested that the extrinsic factors present in the breast tumor microenvironment may play an important role in the progression of DCIS to IBC. The breast cancer microenvironment is composed of many different cell types, including myoepithelial cells, stromal fibroblasts, adipocytes, vascular endothelial cells, and immune cells, as well as the extracellular matrix. The crosstalk between cancer cells and stromal cells is considered an important factor in creating a permissive environment for invasive progression.61 In addition to the role of miRNAs in influencing cancer-associated proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis, as discussed in Role of miRNAs in DCIS Progression, the role of the immune microenvironment has recently begun to be appreciated. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes present in the stroma have been associated with certain prognostic features, such as larger tumor size, high nuclear grade, comedo type with necrosis, and ER negativity, and are mainly present in HER2-enriched and triple-negative DCIS. However, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes seem to have a dichotomous role in DCIS progression, with some studies suggesting that they have an inhibitory effect on invasion in HER2-enriched DCIS, and a proinvasive effect in triple-negative DCIS.62 Several studies have shown that miRNAs control critical functions of tumor-associated immune-system cells and can modulate the cancer-related immune response and affect IBC progression. However, a role for miRNA regulation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes at the DCIS stage is yet to be explored.
miRNAs have recently emerged as important regulatory mediators of cellular crosstalk in the tumor microenvironment. Endogenously produced miRNAs can be secreted from cancer cells to the tumor microenvironment via nanometer-sized extracellular vesicles called exosomes (50 to 100 nm).63 Under hypoxic conditions, breast cancer cells can secrete greater numbers of exosomes compared to normal cells.64 Exosomes have been shown to transport oncogenic factors, including miRNAs, that may remodel the tumor microenvironment, thereby contributing to breast cancer progression.65, 66, 67, 68, 69 Breast cancer cells selectively secrete certain miRNAs in exosomes70 that are detectable in plasma samples derived from xenograft mouse models and breast cancer patients and may indicate the presence of breast cancer.71 Very little research has been conducted to explore the influence of exosome miRNAs in the DCIS microenvironment and how they may regulate breast cancer progression. However, Zhou and colleagues72, 73 have reported on the role of exosome miRNA trafficking in DCIS. Their research has shown that exosomes from DCIS stemlike cells contain miR-140, -29a, and -21, and that these miRNAs can be transferred to other cell types.72 Preadipocytes were also shown to secrete high levels of miR-140 that affected SOX9 signaling in DCIS cells and promoted tumorigenesis.73 A continued effort in this area of research would greatly contribute to our understanding of the role of the tumor microenvironment in the progression of DCIS to invasive disease.
In summary, miRNAs play a role in influencing both the intracellular and intercellular signaling pathways that may contribute to invasive progression. A hypothetical model of the role of miRNAs in breast cancer progression is presented in Figure 2, and a summary of the miRNAs discussed in this review, along with their described target genes and their influence on known or potential pathways, is included in Table 1.
Figure 2.
A hypothetical model of the role of miRNAs in the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The normal breast epithelium is composed of luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Breast cancer initiation and development are characterized by common mutational events, uncontrolled cell proliferation, and reduced apoptosis in the luminal epithelial cell layer. miRNA expression may be altered due to loss of Dicer and Drosha expression and estrogen receptor signaling. Expression of oncogenic miRNAs is activated and expression of tumor suppressor miRNAs is deactivated, allowing continued growth and proliferation through enhanced transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, estrogen receptor (ER), and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 signaling, and loss of E-cadherin that leads to reduced cell–cell and cell-matrix adhesions. Tumor vasculature expands due to low oxygen levels and proangiogenic stimuli in the tumor microenvironment. Loss of miR-140 expression in cancer stem cells leads to sustained tumor growth and survival. Myoepithelial cell layer undergoes changes in gene expression, leading to a compromised cell layer that allows tumor cells that are undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) to invade into the surrounding stroma. Further spreading of cancer cells into the lymphovascular space involves the intravasation of cancer cells into the small vessels within the tumor and may be an early indicator of metastasis. It has recently become clearer that there is a mutual interaction between tumor cells and stromal cells via exosome miRNA signaling. In this model, the tumor-derived exosomes carrying miRNAs can communicate with stromal cells such as fibroblasts, lymphocytes, and adipocytes, which in turn support the growth of the tumor.
Table 1.
Summary and Functional Role of miRNAs in DCIS Progression
| miRNA | Direction of change | Tumor suppressor/oncogene | Targets | Known/proposed pathways or processes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-125b32 | Down | Tumor suppressor |
MEMO1 NRIP1 (alias RIP140) |
HER2 driven cell motility ER signaling |
| miR-18232 | Up | Oncogene | CBX7, DOK4, NMT2 | EMT, signal transduction, tyrosine kinase signaling |
| miR-18332 | Up | Oncogene | EGR1 | Transcriptional regulation |
| let-7 family45 | Down | Tumor suppressor | ER signaling | |
| miR-2148 | Up | Oncogene | MSH2, SMAD7 | TGF-β signaling |
| miR-10b50 | Up | Oncogene | RB1CC1 | EMT, stemness,∗ |
| miR-200 family (miR-200a-c, miR-141, miR-429)32, 53 | Up (normal-DCIS); Down (DCIS to IBC) |
Oncogene and tumor suppressor | EMT | |
| miR-14056 | Down | Tumor suppressor | SOX9, ALDH1 | Cancer stem cells |
| miR-13257 | Down | Tumor suppressor | Cell proliferation | |
| miR-150, miR-15559 | Up | Oncogene | RHOA, PEG10, MYB | Cell proliferation, metastasis, TGF-β signaling |
| miR-14073 (exosome) | Up (preadipocytes) | Oncogene | SOX9 | Cancer stem cells |
DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; EMT, epithelial to mesenchymal transition; ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, IBC, invasive breast cancer; TGF, transforming growth factor.
Stemness is defined as the ability to self-renew and differentiate.
Therapeutic Targeting of miRNA
Due to the function of miRNAs in maintaining cell homeostasis and their ability to specifically target and silence gene expression, miRNAs and siRNAs are considered an important area of therapeutic drug research and development. The first miRNA therapeutic, called miravirsen (Santaris Pharma, Copenhagen, Denmark), is an inhibitor of miR-122. Miravirsen is currently in phase IIA clinical trials for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection.74 Many RNA therapeutics are in the various stages of preclinical and clinical development for cardiovascular disease, other cancer types, and viral infections.75 Significant interest is evident in the development of miRNA and siRNA therapeutics for breast cancer. For example, the highest number of siRNA-related cancer therapeutic patents granted in the United States were for breast cancer applications.76 However, this high volume of patents has not yet resulted in any clinical trials of RNA therapeutics for breast cancer.
The primary challenges facing the development of miRNA-based therapeutics for breast cancer include:
i) The lack of conclusive evidence supporting the clinical utility of any specific miRNA for the treatment of breast cancer, especially in preinvasive DCIS. The inconsistency among various studies can primarily be attributed to differences in the type, stage, and number of clinical specimens utilized, as well as the methods of data generation and chosen platform for molecular analysis.
ii) A robust understanding not only of the molecular mechanisms involved in the miRNA regulation of breast cancer development and progression, but also of the role of a particular miRNA in normal tissue homeostasis. This information is crucial to specifically target cancer cells, while reducing the risk for adverse off-target effects.
iii) The complex inter- and intratumor heterogeneity of breast cancer. It has been firmly established that the clinical response to current therapies for breast cancer patients is dependent on the breast cancer subtype, and it is therefore likely that the response to miRNA therapies would also be subtype dependent. In addition, the field of RNA-therapeutic development has been challenged by effective delivery of a particular miRNA or siRNA to its target tissue. Several issues with the pharmacologic properties of RNA-based therapeutics have been observed, including off-target effects, low stability in the serum, and innate immune responses.77, 78 With the latter resulting in the cancellation of a phase I clinical trial of MRX-34 (Mirna Therapeutics, Inc., Austin, TX), which delivers an miR-34 miRNA mimic for the treatment of primary liver cancer, advanced solid tumors, and hematologic malignancies.79 New areas of RNA-therapeutic delivery that may provide better bioavailability, such as cationic liposomes78 and engineered exosomes,80 are being explored due to their ability to encapsulate and deliver small, negatively charged RNAs.
The idea of using RNA therapeutics as a preventive agent to block DCIS from transitioning to IDC is an attractive yet unexplored area of research. However, a thorough understanding of the miRNA-expression patterns and function specifically associated with the cellular processes involved in the progression to invasive disease, and a robust preclinical analysis, are required for miRNA-based therapeutics to become a reality.
Summary and Future Perspectives
miRNA expression is dysregulated very early in breast cancer development, and these changes have important roles in modulating gene expression and pathways crucial for invasive progression. Endogenous miRNAs in DCIS cells influence gene-expression programs that may promote tumorigenic behavior, and extracellular miRNAs can influence the behavior of cells in the tumor microenvironment. Although progress has been made, taken together, the expression and functional role of miRNAs in DCIS progression are both complex and poorly understood. More scientific effort is obviously needed in furthering the understanding of the functional role of miRNAs in the progression of DCIS. Better models able to integrate both the microenvironment and tumor cell factors will greatly advance the understanding of the miRNA biology of breast cancer progression and enhance the ability to better predict invasive progression and therapeutically target DCIS before its advancement to invasive disease.
Acknowledgments
B.N.H. conceived of, drafted, and revised the manuscript; W.-Q.D. drafted and revised the manuscript; both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Footnotes
Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Theme Issue
Supported by National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant U54GM104938 (W.-Q.D.), the Presbyterian Health Foundation (W.-Q.D.), and Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology grant HR17-052 (B.N.H.).
Disclosures: None declared.
This article is part of a review series on Ductal Carcinoma in Situ—Discerning Aggressive versus Benign Disease Using Molecular Features.
References
- 1.Lopez-Garcia M.A., Geyer F.C., Lacroix-Triki M., Marchio C., Reis-Filho J.S. Breast cancer precursors revisited: molecular features and progression pathways. Histopathology. 2010;57:171–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03568.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Allegra C.J., Aberle D.R., Ganschow P., Hahn S.M., Lee C.N., Millon-Underwood S., Pike M.C., Reed S.D., Saftlas A.F., Scarvalone S.A., Schwartz A.M., Slomski C., Yothers G., Zon R. NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2009;26:1–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Perou C.M., Sorlie T., Eisen M.B., van de Rijn M., Jeffrey S.S., Rees C.A., Pollack J.R., Ross D.T., Johnsen H., Akslen L.A., Fluge O., Pergamenschikov A., Williams C., Zhu S.X., Lonning P.E., Borresen-Dale A.L., Brown P.O., Botstein D. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–752. doi: 10.1038/35021093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sorlie T., Tibshirani R., Parker J., Hastie T., Marron J.S., Nobel A., Deng S., Johnsen H., Pesich R., Geisler S., Demeter J., Perou C.M., Lonning P.E., Brown P.O., Borresen-Dale A.L., Botstein D. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:8418–8423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0932692100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tamimi R.M., Colditz G.A., Hazra A., Baer H.J., Hankinson S.E., Rosner B., Marotti J., Connolly J.L., Schnitt S.J., Collins L.C. Traditional breast cancer risk factors in relation to molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131:159–167. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1702-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhou W., Jirstrom K., Amini R.M., Fjallskog M.L., Sollie T., Lindman H., Sorlie T., Blomqvist C., Warnberg F. Molecular subtypes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and their relation to prognosis: a population-based cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:512. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bartlett J.M., Nofech-Moses S., Rakovitch E. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: can biomarkers improve current management? Clin Chem. 2014;60:60–67. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.207183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aubele M., Mattis A., Zitzelsberger H., Walch A., Kremer M., Welzl G., Hofler H., Werner M. Extensive ductal carcinoma In situ with small foci of invasive ductal carcinoma: evidence of genetic resemblance by CGH. Int J Cancer. 2000;85:82–86. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(20000101)85:1<82::aid-ijc15>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Foschini M.P., Morandi L., Leonardi E., Flamminio F., Ishikawa Y., Masetti R., Eusebi V. Genetic clonal mapping of in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma indicates the field cancerization phenomenon in the breast. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:1310–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim S.Y., Jung S.H., Kim M.S., Baek I.P., Lee S.H., Kim T.M., Chung Y.J., Lee S.H. Genomic differences between pure ductal carcinoma in situ and synchronous ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6:7597–7607. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kroigard A.B., Larsen M.J., Laenkholm A.V., Knoop A.S., Jensen J.D., Bak M., Mollenhauer J., Kruse T.A., Thomassen M. Clonal expansion and linear genome evolution through breast cancer progression from pre-invasive stages to asynchronous metastasis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:5634–5649. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee S., Stewart S., Nagtegaal I., Luo J., Wu Y., Colditz G., Medina D., Allred D.C. Differentially expressed genes regulating the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2012;72:4574–4586. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Muggerud A.A., Hallett M., Johnsen H., Kleivi K., Zhou W., Tahmasebpoor S., Amini R.M., Botling J., Borresen-Dale A.L., Sorlie T., Warnberg F. Molecular diversity in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and early invasive breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2010;4:357–368. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ma X.J., Salunga R., Tuggle J.T., Gaudet J., Enright E., McQuary P., Payette T., Pistone M., Stecker K., Zhang B.M., Zhou Y.X., Varnholt H., Smith B., Gadd M., Chatfield E., Kessler J., Baer T.M., Erlander M.G., Sgroi D.C. Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:5974–5979. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931261100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Porter D., Lahti-Domenici J., Keshaviah A., Bae Y.K., Argani P., Marks J., Richardson A., Cooper A., Strausberg R., Riggins G.J., Schnitt S., Gabrielson E., Gelman R., Polyak K. Molecular markers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Mol Cancer Res. 2003;1:362–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abba M.C., Gong T., Lu Y., Lee J., Zhong Y., Lacunza E., Butti M., Takata Y., Gaddis S., Shen J., Estecio M.R., Sahin A.A., Aldaz C.M. A molecular portrait of high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Res. 2015;75:3980–3990. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hannafon B.N., Ding W.Q. miRNAs as biomarkers for predicting the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Pathol. 2018;188:542–549. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Casasent A.K., Edgerton M., Navin N.E. Genome evolution in ductal carcinoma in situ: invasion of the clones. J Pathol. 2017;241:208–218. doi: 10.1002/path.4840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pang J.B., Savas P., Fellowes A.P., Mir Arnau G., Kader T., Vedururu R., Hewitt C., Takano E.A., Byrne D.J., Choong D.Y., Millar E.K., Lee C.S., O'Toole S.A., Lakhani S.R., Cummings M.C., Mann G.B., Campbell I.G., Dobrovic A., Loi S., Gorringe K.L., Fox S.B. Breast ductal carcinoma in situ carry mutational driver events representative of invasive breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:952–963. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cancer Genome Atlas Network Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70. doi: 10.1038/nature11412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hernandez L., Wilkerson P.M., Lambros M.B., Campion-Flora A., Rodrigues D.N., Gauthier A., Cabral C., Pawar V., Mackay A., A'Hern R., Marchio C., Palacios J., Natrajan R., Weigelt B., Reis-Filho J.S. Genomic and mutational profiling of ductal carcinomas in situ and matched adjacent invasive breast cancers reveals intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity and clonal selection. J Pathol. 2012;227:42–52. doi: 10.1002/path.3990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Banerji S., Cibulskis K., Rangel-Escareno C., Brown K.K., Carter S.L., Frederick A.M. Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes. Nature. 2012;486:405–409. doi: 10.1038/nature11154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lesurf R., Aure M.R., Mork H.H., Vitelli V., Oslo Breast Cancer Research C., Lundgren S., Borresen-Dale A.L., Kristensen V., Warnberg F., Hallett M., Sorlie T. Molecular features of subtype-specific progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer. Cell Rep. 2016;16:1166–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bartel D.P. Metazoan MicroRNAs. Cell. 2018;173:20–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kozomara A., Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D68–D73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lim L.P., Lau N.C., Garrett-Engele P., Grimson A., Schelter J.M., Castle J., Bartel D.P., Linsley P.S., Johnson J.M. Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs. Nature. 2005;433:769–773. doi: 10.1038/nature03315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Melo S.A., Esteller M. Dysregulation of microRNAs in cancer: playing with fire. FEBS Lett. 2011;585:2087–2099. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lu J., Getz G., Miska E.A., Alvarez-Saavedra E., Lamb J., Peck D., Sweet-Cordero A., Ebert B.L., Mak R.H., Ferrando A.A., Downing J.R., Jacks T., Horvitz H.R., Golub T.R. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435:834–838. doi: 10.1038/nature03702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Iorio M.V., Ferracin M., Liu C.G., Veronese A., Spizzo R., Sabbioni S., Magri E., Pedriali M., Fabbri M., Campiglio M., Menard S., Palazzo J.P., Rosenberg A., Musiani P., Volinia S., Nenci I., Calin G.A., Querzoli P., Negrini M., Croce C.M. MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7065–7070. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kumar M.S., Lu J., Mercer K.L., Golub T.R., Jacks T. Impaired microRNA processing enhances cellular transformation and tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2007;39:673–677. doi: 10.1038/ng2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ozen M., Creighton C.J., Ozdemir M., Ittmann M. Widespread deregulation of microRNA expression in human prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27:1788–1793. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hannafon B.N., Sebastiani P., de las Morenas A., Lu J., Rosenberg C.L. Expression of microRNA and their gene targets are dysregulated in preinvasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R24. doi: 10.1186/bcr2839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Farazi T.A., Horlings H.M., Ten Hoeve J.J., Mihailovic A., Halfwerk H., Morozov P., Brown M., Hafner M., Reyal F., van Kouwenhove M., Kreike B., Sie D., Hovestadt V., Wessels L.F., van de Vijver M.J., Tuschl T. MicroRNA sequence and expression analysis in breast tumors by deep sequencing. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4443–4453. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Volinia S., Galasso M., Sana M.E., Wise T.F., Palatini J., Huebner K., Croce C.M. Breast cancer signatures for invasiveness and prognosis defined by deep sequencing of microRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:3024–3029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200010109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Haakensen V.D., Nygaard V., Greger L., Aure M.R., Fromm B., Bukholm I.R., Luders T., Chin S.F., Git A., Caldas C., Kristensen V.N., Brazma A., Borresen-Dale A.L., Hovig E., Helland A. Subtype-specific micro-RNA expression signatures in breast cancer progression. Int J Cancer. 2016;139:1117–1128. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dedes K.J., Natrajan R., Lambros M.B., Geyer F.C., Lopez-Garcia M.A., Savage K., Jones R.L., Reis-Filho J.S. Down-regulation of the miRNA master regulators Drosha and Dicer is associated with specific subgroups of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:138–150. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Khoshnaw S.M., Rakha E.A., Abdel-Fatah T.M., Nolan C.C., Hodi Z., Macmillan D.R., Ellis I.O., Green A.R. Loss of Dicer expression is associated with breast cancer progression and recurrence. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:403–413. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2169-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Blenkiron C., Goldstein L.D., Thorne N.P., Spiteri I., Chin S.F., Dunning M.J., Barbosa-Morais N.L., Teschendorff A.E., Green A.R., Ellis I.O., Tavare S., Caldas C., Miska E.A. MicroRNA expression profiling of human breast cancer identifies new markers of tumor subtype. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R214. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Khoshnaw S.M., Rakha E.A., Abdel-Fatah T., Nolan C.C., Hodi Z., Macmillan R.D., Ellis I.O., Green A.R. The microRNA maturation regulator Drosha is an independent predictor of outcome in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137:139–153. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2358-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Maillot G., Lacroix-Triki M., Pierredon S., Gratadou L., Schmidt S., Benes V., Roche H., Dalenc F., Auboeuf D., Millevoi S., Vagner S. Widespread estrogen-dependent repression of microRNAs involved in breast tumor cell growth. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8332–8340. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vargas A.C., McCart Reed A.E., Waddell N., Lane A., Reid L.E., Smart C.E., Cocciardi S., da Silva L., Song S., Chenevix-Trench G., Simpson P.T., Lakhani S.R. Gene expression profiling of tumour epithelial and stromal compartments during breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:153–165. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2123-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ibrahim S.A., Yip G.W., Stock C., Pan J.W., Neubauer C., Poeter M., Pupjalis D., Koo C.Y., Kelsch R., Schule R., Rescher U., Kiesel L., Gotte M. Targeting of syndecan-1 by microRNA miR-10b promotes breast cancer cell motility and invasiveness via a Rho-GTPase- and E-cadherin-dependent mechanism. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:E884–E896. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tsai D.Y., Hung K.H., Lin I.Y., Su S.T., Wu S.Y., Chung C.H., Wang T.C., Li W.H., Shih A.C., Lin K.I. Uncovering microRNA regulatory hubs that modulate plasma cell differentiation. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17957. doi: 10.1038/srep17957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang Z.F., Wang Y.J., Fan S.H., Du S.X., Li X.D., Wu D.M., Lu J., Zheng Y.L. MicroRNA-182 downregulates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling, inhibits proliferation, and promotes apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cells by targeting HOXA9. Oncotarget. 2017;8:101345–101361. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 45.Zhao Y., Deng C., Wang J., Xiao J., Gatalica Z., Recker R.R., Xiao G.G. Let-7 family miRNAs regulate estrogen receptor alpha signaling in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127:69–80. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0972-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tang B., Vu M., Booker T., Santner S.J., Miller F.R., Anver M.R., Wakefield L.M. TGF-beta switches from tumor suppressor to prometastatic factor in a model of breast cancer progression. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:1116–1124. doi: 10.1172/JCI18899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chen L., Li Y., Fu Y., Peng J., Mo M.H., Stamatakos M., Teal C.B., Brem R.F., Stojadinovic A., Grinkemeyer M., McCaffrey T.A., Man Y.G., Fu S.W. Role of deregulated microRNAs in breast cancer progression using FFPE tissue. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Davis B.N., Hilyard A.C., Nguyen P.H., Lagna G., Hata A. Smad proteins bind a conserved RNA sequence to promote microRNA maturation by Drosha. Mol Cell. 2010;39:373–384. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Man Y.G., Sang Q.X. The significance of focal myoepithelial cell layer disruptions in human breast tumor invasion: a paradigm shift from the "protease-centered" hypothesis. Exp Cell Res. 2004;301:103–118. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lo P.K., Zhang Y., Yao Y., Wolfson B., Yu J., Han S.Y., Duru N., Zhou Q. Tumor-associated myoepithelial cells promote the invasive progression of ductal carcinoma in situ through activation of TGFbeta signaling. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:11466–11484. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.775080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Korpal M., Lee E.S., Hu G., Kang Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:14910–14914. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800074200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gregory P.A., Bracken C.P., Smith E., Bert A.G., Wright J.A., Roslan S., Morris M., Wyatt L., Farshid G., Lim Y.Y., Lindeman G.J., Shannon M.F., Drew P.A., Khew-Goodall Y., Goodall G.J. An autocrine TGF-beta/ZEB/miR-200 signaling network regulates establishment and maintenance of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:1686–1698. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-02-0103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jang K., Ahn H., Sim J., Han H., Abdul R., Paik S.S., Chung M.S., Jang S.J. Loss of microRNA-200a expression correlates with tumor progression in breast cancer. Transl Res. 2014;163:242–251. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2013.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Batlle E., Clevers H. Cancer stem cells revisited. Nat Med. 2017;23:1124–1134. doi: 10.1038/nm.4409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Espina V., Mariani B.D., Gallagher R.I., Tran K., Banks S., Wiedemann J., Huryk H., Mueller C., Adamo L., Deng J., Petricoin E.F., Pastore L., Zaman S., Menezes G., Mize J., Johal J., Edmiston K., Liotta L.A. Malignant precursor cells pre-exist in human breast DCIS and require autophagy for survival. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Li Q., Yao Y., Eades G., Liu Z., Zhang Y., Zhou Q. Downregulation of miR-140 promotes cancer stem cell formation in basal-like early stage breast cancer. Oncogene. 2014;33:2589–2600. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li S., Meng H., Zhou F., Zhai L., Zhang L., Gu F., Fan Y., Lang R., Fu L., Gu L., Qi L. MicroRNA-132 is frequently down-regulated in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of breast and acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell proliferation. Pathol Res Pract. 2013;209:179–183. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rakha E.A., Martin S., Lee A.H., Morgan D., Pharoah P.D., Hodi Z., MacMillan D., Ellis I.O. The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118:3670–3680. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Soon P.S., Provan P.J., Kim E., Pathmanathan N., Graham D., Clarke C.L., Balleine R.L. Profiling differential microRNA expression between in situ, infiltrative and lympho-vascular space invasive breast cancer: a pilot study. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2018;35:3–13. doi: 10.1007/s10585-017-9868-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nogales-Cadenas R., Cai Y., Lin J.R., Zhang Q., Zhang W., Montagna C., Zhang Z.D. MicroRNA expression and gene regulation drive breast cancer progression and metastasis in PyMT mice. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18:75. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0735-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hu M., Polyak K. Molecular characterisation of the tumour microenvironment in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:2760–2765. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Agahozo M.C., Hammerl D., Debets R., Kok M., van Deurzen C.H.M. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: friends or foes? Mod Pathol. 2018;31:1012–1025. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0030-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hannafon B.N., Ding W.Q. Intercellular communication by exosome-derived microRNAs in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:14240–14269. doi: 10.3390/ijms140714240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.King H.W., Michael M.Z., Gleadle J.M. Hypoxic enhancement of exosome release by breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Maji S., Chaudhary P., Akopova I., Nguyen P.M., Hare R.J., Gryczynski I., Vishwanatha J.K. Exosomal annexin II promotes angiogenesis and breast cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15:93–105. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Xiao D., Barry S., Kmetz D., Egger M., Pan J., Rai S.N., Qu J., McMasters K.M., Hao H. Melanoma cell-derived exosomes promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition in primary melanocytes through paracrine/autocrine signaling in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Lett. 2016;376:318–327. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.03.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhang L., Zhang S., Yao J., Lowery F.J., Zhang Q., Huang W.C., Li P., Li M., Wang X., Zhang C., Wang H., Ellis K., Cheerathodi M., McCarty J.H., Palmieri D., Saunus J., Lakhani S., Huang S., Sahin A.A., Aldape K.D., Steeg P.S., Yu D. Microenvironment-induced PTEN loss by exosomal microRNA primes brain metastasis outgrowth. Nature. 2015;527:100–104. doi: 10.1038/nature15376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rodriguez M., Silva J., Herrera A., Herrera M., Pena C., Martin P., Gil-Calderon B., Larriba M.J., Coronado M.J., Soldevilla B., Turrion V.S., Provencio M., Sanchez A., Bonilla F., Garcia-Barberan V. Exosomes enriched in stemness/metastatic-related mRNAs promote oncogenic potential in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6:40575–40587. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Donnarumma E., Fiore D., Nappa M., Roscigno G., Adamo A., Iaboni M., Russo V., Affinito A., Puoti I., Quintavalle C., Rienzo A., Piscuoglio S., Thomas R., Condorelli G. Cancer-associated fibroblasts release exosomal microRNAs that dictate an aggressive phenotype in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:19592–19608. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Pigati L., Yaddanapudi S.C., Iyengar R., Kim D.J., Hearn S.A., Danforth D., Hastings M.L., Duelli D.M. Selective release of microRNA species from normal and malignant mammary epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hannafon B.N., Trigoso Y.D., Calloway C.L., Zhao Y.D., Lum D.H., Welm A.L., Zhao Z.J., Blick K.E., Dooley W.C., Ding W.Q. Plasma exosome microRNAs are indicative of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18:90. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0753-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Li Q., Eades G., Yao Y., Zhang Y., Zhou Q. Characterization of a stem-like subpopulation in basal-like ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:1303–1312. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.502278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gernapudi R., Yao Y., Zhang Y., Wolfson B., Roy S., Duru N., Eades G., Yang P., Zhou Q. Targeting exosomes from preadipocytes inhibits preadipocyte to cancer stem cell signaling in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;150:685–695. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3326-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gebert L.F., Rebhan M.A., Crivelli S.E., Denzler R., Stoffel M., Hall J. Miravirsen (SPC3649) can inhibit the biogenesis of miR-122. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:609–621. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rupaimoole R., Slack F.J. MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:203–222. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Chakraborty C., Sharma A.R., Sharma G., Doss C.G.P., Lee S.S. Therapeutic miRNA and siRNA: moving from bench to clinic as next generation medicine. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017;8:132–143. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2017.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Miller A.D. Delivery of RNAi therapeutics: work in progress. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10:781–811. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2013.855471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hong C.A., Nam Y.S. Functional nanostructures for effective delivery of small interfering RNA therapeutics. Theranostics. 2014;4:1211–1232. doi: 10.7150/thno.8491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bouchie A. First microRNA mimic enters clinic. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:577. doi: 10.1038/nbt0713-577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Luan X., Sansanaphongpricha K., Myers I., Chen H., Yuan H., Sun D. Engineering exosomes as refined biological nanoplatforms for drug delivery. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38:754–763. doi: 10.1038/aps.2017.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


