In 1, the following error was published.
The term “rotationary” throughout the article should be “rotational”. Locations where this term can be found are shown below:
The correct title should be “A Simple Approach to Assessment of a Total Knee Replacement's Rotational Profile Using Computed Tomography”.
The running title of the article should be “TKR Rotational Profile Using CT”.
On page 350, the fourth sentence of Introduction should read as “The rotational profile of a TKR prosthesis is traditionally difficult to measure radiologically, and is not readily achievable using plain film X‐rays.”
On page 352, in the second paragraph of Discussion, the first sentence should read as “The difficulties encountered in formally assessing the rotational profile of TKR prosthesis due to the facilities required and budget restrictions that exist prove how beneficial a simple, accessible technique would be to orthopaedic surgeons worldwide.”
Also, on page 352, in the third paragraph of Discussion, the first sentence should read as “This approach to the assessment of the rotational profile of TKR prosthesis provides a diagnosis of malrotation when gross evidence is available, as in the case described.”
The authors apologize for the error and any convenience it may have caused.
Reference
- 1. Hughes AJ, O'hEireamhoin S, Heffernan E, Hurson C. A Simple Approach to Assessment of a Total Knee Replacement's Rotationary Profile Using Computed Tomography. Orthop Surg, 2015, 7: 350–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
