Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Oct 6;68(11):2772–2777. doi: 10.1002/art.39765

HLA–DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 in Juvenile-Onset Systemic Sclerosis

Anne M Stevens 1, Sami B Kanaan 2, Kathryn S Torok 3, Thomas A Medsger 4, Maureen D Mayes 5, John D Reveille 5, Marisa Klein-Gitelman 6, Ann M Reed 7, Tzielan Lee 8, Suzanne C Li 9, Gretchen Henstorf 10, Christine Luu 2, Tessa Aydelotte 2, J Lee Nelson 11
PMCID: PMC6594690  NIHMSID: NIHMS988051  PMID: 27214100

Abstract

Objective.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare disease that is particularly uncommon in children. Specific HLA alleles have been associated with SSc in adults. This study was undertaken to investigate HLA class II alleles in juvenile-onset SSc.

Methods.

DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 alleles were determined by DNA-based HLA typing. Analyses were conducted comparing Caucasian patients with juvenileonset SSc (n = 76) to healthy Caucasian controls (n = 581).

Results.

Initial analyses focused on HLA class II associations previously reported in adult Caucasian patients with SSc. The frequency of DRB1*11 was not significantly increased in juvenile-onset SSc (22.4% of patients with juvenile-onset SSc versus 17.6% of controls; odds ratio [OR] 1.35, P = 0.34), nor were the specific DRB1*11:01 or *11:04 alleles. DQA1*05, a risk factor previously identified in adult men with SSc, was increased in patients with juvenile-onset SSc versus controls (57.9% versus 44.1%; OR 1.76, P = 0.027), as was DRB1*03 (34.2% versus 22.5%; OR 1.79, P = 0.031). Secondary analyses of all DRB1 allele groups revealed an association with DRB1*10 (10.5% of patients with juvenile-onset SSc versus 1.5% of controls; OR 7.48, P = 0.0002). As this is a new observation, correction was made for multiple comparisons of 13 different DRB1 allele groups; results nevertheless remained significant (P = 0.003). Also, a lower frequency of DRB1*01 was observed in patients with juvenile-onset SSc who were younger at disease onset (OR 0.06, P = 0.01) and in those with antibodies to topoisomerase (OR 0.14, P = 0.024).

Conclusion.

Associations of HLA alleles with juvenile-onset SSc differed from associations with SSc in women, but were similar to associations with SSc in men. Additionally, a novel association with DRB1*10 was observed in children. The greatest proportion of genetic risk of SSc is contributed by the HLA complex, and the current study reveals the importance of the association of HLA class II genes in juvenile-onset SSc.


Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic inflammatory disease leading to end-organ fibrosis with significant morbidity and mortality. The etiology of SSc is unknown. The concordance rate in twins is low, but a genetic contribution has been demonstrated in gene association studies (1,2), with the HLA class II region being the most significantly associated region by far. Therefore it is likely that, as in other autoimmune diseases, HLA molecules contribute directly to the pathogenesis of SSc.

SSc is an uncommon autoimmune disease, and juvenile-onset SSc, defined as, <16 years of age at onset, is extremely rare, estimated at, <5% of all SSc patients (3,4). SSc in children shares features with adult SSc, but with notable differences (3). Unlike adult patients with SSc, those with juvenile-onset SSc have a greater predominance of diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) and overlap syndromes (dermatomyositis–scleroderma overlap). Patients with juvenile-onset SSc also have higher survival rates related to lower rates of renal crisis, symptomatic lung disease, and pulmonary hypertension (36). Although numerous studies have investigated HLA associations in adult SSc, age at onset has not generally been considered. Only 1 previous study has examined HLA alleles in juvenile-onset SSc, but all 27 patients in that study had overlap syndrome (7). To address the lack of studies including cohorts of patients with juvenile-onset SSc without overlap syndromes, we established a cooperative effort of 3 centers in the US with juvenile-onset SSc cohorts, to test the association of HLA–DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 alleles previously reported in adult SSc with that in juvenile-onset SSc.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study subjects and HLA genotyping.

Patients were recruited between 1993 and 2014 at 3 centers. The Seattle center included patients from the Seattle Children’s Hospital, the University of Washington, and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and additional patients whose data were contributed by collaborators in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (including the Mayo Clinic [Rochester, MN], the Lurie Children’s Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, and the Lucile Packard Hospital [http:www.caragroup.org]). The other 2 centers were the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and the Scleroderma Family Registry and DNA Repository based at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Human subjects committees approved the studies at each institution, and all research was carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Diagnoses were determined by rheumatologists at each institution. All included patients had disease onset at <16 years of age. Healthy Caucasian control subjects were recruited as part of other ongoing studies in Seattle and as part of other studies associated with the Scleroderma Family Registry in Houston. These control cohorts were combined in the analysis, as there were no significant differences in allele frequencies between sites. Study data were collected and managed using the Research Electronic Data Capture tool hosted at the University of Washington (https://www.iths.org/investigators/services/bmi/redcap/). HLA genotyping was conducted for the class II loci DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 using sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe typing, Dynal Linestrips, or Luminex-based polymerase chain reaction–sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe techniques (One Lambda) (8,9).

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6 software. To compare data for patients with juvenile-onset SSc to that for controls, an exact P value was calculated using a 2-tailed Fisher’s exact test. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using Woolf’s method. For previously described associations (in adults), i.e., HLA–DRB1*01, *03, *07, *11 (*11:01 and *11:04), DRB1*15 (*15:01), DQA1*05, DQB1*02, *03 (*03:01), and DQB1*05 (*05:01), P values were presented without correction. Secondarily, all allele groups were examined for novel associations using Bonferroni correction for the number of comparisons. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Clinical features.

Among the 85 patients with juvenile-onset SSc enrolled in this study, 76 were Caucasian, 5 African American, 1 Asian, 1 Native American, and 2 of mixed race. Because HLA allele frequencies vary in different racial/ethnic populations, and only 9 patients were non-Caucasian, analyses were conducted comparing Caucasian patients with juvenile-onset SSc to healthy Caucasian controls. Patient characteristics from the 3 centers were similar with the exception of an increased frequency of dcSSc contributed by the Seattle cohort, and more patients with anticentromere antibodies (ACAs) from Pittsburgh (Table 1). Four patients with juvenile-onset SSc had myositis overlap, and 2 had mixed connective tissue disease. Although the classification system is not validated for children, we estimated from clinical records that 63% of the patients with juvenile-onset SSc had limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and 37% dcSSc. The frequencies of anti–topoisomerase I (anti–topo I) and ACA in patients with juvenile-onset SSc were lower than in adult patients, consistent with previous reports (46,10). Surprisingly, anti–topo I antibodies were significantly more prevalent in younger juvenile patients, while ACAs were less prevalent (see Supplementary Figure 1, available on the Arthritis & Rheumatology web site at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.39765/abstract).

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of Caucasian juvenile-onset SSc patients and Caucasian controls*

Juvenile-onset SSc Controls
All (n = 76) Seattle (n = 36) Pittsburgh (n = 20) Houston (n = 20) All (n = 581) Seattle (n = 176) Houston (n = 405)
Sex, % female 87 83 95 85 48 46 49
Age, mean years 10 8.9 11 11 39 16 49
Age, median (IQR) years 11.0 (6–13) 10.2 (5.9–11.9) 11.9 (9–14.1) 11.5 (8.5–13.6) 40 (24–56) 14 (8–23) 51 (37–61)
SSc subtype, %
 dcSSc 37 50 25 25
 lcSSc 63 50 75 75
Autoantibodies (positive), %
 ANA 90.5 88.9 100 84.2
 Anti-topo I 32.4 36.1 33.3 25.0
 ACA 18.3 6.1 47.4 10.5
*

SSc = systemic sclerosis; IQR = interquartile range; dcSSc = diffuse cutaneous SSc; lcSSc = limited cutaneous SSc; ANA = antinuclear antibody; anti–topo I = anti–topoisomerase I; ACA = anticentromere antibody.

Age at disease onset for juvenile-onset SSc patients; age at which blood was obtained for controls.

Comparison to previously reported HLA associations with SSc in adults.

Alleles and allele groups that had been reported to be associated with SSc in adult patients were examined first. The frequency of HLA–DRB1*11, the allele group most consistently described in association with SSc in Caucasian adults (8,1114), was not significantly increased in patients with juvenile-onset SSc compared to controls (22.4% versus 17.6%; OR 1.35, P = 0.34), nor were the frequencies of specific DRB1*11:01 or *11:04 alleles (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1, available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.39765/abstract).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for associations of HLA class II allele groups with juvenile-onset systemic sclerosis versus healthy controls. Red and blue bars represent risk and protective associations, respectively, that have P values between 0.05 and 0.01 (except for DRB1*10, for which P = 0.0002 [P = 0.003 after correction for multiple comparisons]).

DQA1*05, which is in linkage disequilibrium with DRB1*11, DRB1*03, and some alleles of DRB1*13 and *14, has also been described as being increased in adult SSc (11,15). In the current cohort, the frequency of DQA1*05 was significantly increased, present in 57.9% of patients with juvenile-onset SSc compared to 44.1% of controls (OR 1.76 [95% CI 1.08–2.8], P = 0.027).

The frequency of DRB1*03, which was increased in some studies of adult SSc (16), was increased to an extent similar to the frequency of DQA1*05, present in 34.2% of patients versus 22.5% of controls (OR 1.79 [95% CI 1.07–2.98], P = 0.031). The frequency of DRB1*01, which has been associated with adult lcSSc and ACA positivity, was not increased in juvenile-onset SSc overall (17.1% of patients versus 23.8% of controls).

DRB1*07 has been described as protective for SSc in Caucasians (11,12). Although there was a trend toward a decreased frequency of DRB1*07 in patients with juvenile-onset SSc, the difference compared with controls was not significant (19.7% versus 27.9%). DRB1*07 is in linkage disequilibrium with DQB1*02:02 as well as DQB1*03:03. In contrast to studies of adult SSc in which the frequency of DQB1*02:02 was decreased (11), frequencies of DQB1*02:02 and DQB1*03:03 were not significantly different in juvenile-onset SSc versus controls.

Some studies have demonstrated a decreased frequency of DRB1*15 in Caucasians with SSc (11), while others have shown an increase (17). In patients with juvenile-onset SSc, there was a trend toward a decreased frequency of DRB1*15 compared to controls (17.1% versus 28.1%, respectively), but the difference was not significant. Comparing only patients in the lcSSc disease subset to controls, the OR for DRB1*15 was 0.44 ([95% CI 0.19–1.00], P = 0.043). A marginally significant decrease in the frequency of DQB1*06 was observed in juvenileonset SSc (OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.35–0.98], P 5 0.047), mostly attributable to DQB1*06:02, which is in linkage disequilibrium with DRB1*15 (Figure 1).

Novel HLA associations in juvenile-onset SSc.

After considering the HLA alleles and allele groups according to previously reported associations in adults, our analysis of juvenile-onset SSc was extended to consider any DRB1, DQA1, or DQB1 associations that might be unique to juvenile-onset disease (Figure 1). A novel association was observed with DRB1*10, present in 10.5% of patients with juvenile-onset SSc compared to 1.5% of controls (OR 7.48 [95% CI 2.79–20], P = 0.0002). As this is a new observation, we conservatively corrected for 13 different DRB1 allele groups tested. The difference remained significant (P = 0.003).

Clinical features of juvenile-onset SSc and HLA associations.

Although the frequency of DRB1*01 was not significantly different between the total juvenile-onset SSc cohort and the healthy controls (see Supplementary Table 1, available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.39765/abstract), there were several notable clinical differences among the patients with juvenile-onset SSc who were positive for DRB1*01. The frequency of DRB1*01 differed according to age at disease onset and autoantibody status (Figure 2). DRB1*01 was less prevalent in patients who were younger at disease onset (<6 years) compared to those who were older at disease onset (11–16 years) (OR 0.06 [95% CI 0.004–1.16], P = 0.01).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Proportion of patients with juvenile-onset systemic sclerosis (jSSc) who were positive for HLA–DRB1*01 alleles, by age at onset and by presence of anticentromere antibodies (ACAs) and anti–topoisomerase I (anti-topo I). CTL = control.

There was a close association between specific autoantibodies and disease type in juvenile-onset SSc; patients with anti–topo I were more likely to have dcSSc while those with ACA were more likely to have lcSSc. In studies of adult SSc, HLA alleles have been found to be associated with specific autoantibodies more closely than with clinical phenotypes (14). For instance, DRB1*01 was associated with ACA, which is more common in patients with lcSSc (18). This association was also supported in the current study; DRB1*01 was present in a significantly higher proportion of patients with juvenile-onset SSc who were ACA positive compared to patients who were anti–topo I positive (Figure 2). Frequencies of DRB1*01 did not differ significantly between patients with juvenile-onset SSc who were ACA positive and controls (38.5% versus 23.8%), although only a small number of patients were positive for ACA. However, frequencies of DRB1*01 were significantly decreased in patients positive for anti–topo I compared to controls (4.2% versus 23.8%; OR 0.14 [95% CI 0.02–1.04], P = 0.024). The frequency of DRB1*01 was also decreased in patients with dcSSc compared to controls (7.1% versus 23.8%; OR 0.25 [95% CI 0.06–1.05], P = 0.04). The difference may be at least partially attributed to the increased proportion of dcSSc positivity and for anti–topo I in the youngest patients, as DRB1*01 was less prevalent in patients who were younger at disease onset (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure 1, available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.39765/abstract).

The strong association of DRB1*10 with juvenile-onset SSc was present regardless of clinical phenotype. It was increased among both patients with dcSSc and those with lcSSc compared to controls (OR 10.6 [95% CI 3.04–36.86], P = 0.002 and OR 5.8 [95% CI 1.71–19.52], P = 0.013, respectively), as well as among patients who were positive for anti–topo I (OR 9.1 [95% CI 2.29–36.00], P = 0.01), and there was a non-significant trend toward an increase among patients who were positive for ACA (OR 5.3 [95% CI 0.62–45.2], P = 0.2). No DQB1 allele was significantly associated with anti–topo I or ACA.

Specific amino acid sequences common to multiple HLA alleles have been considered in the effort to identify functionally important domains of the HLA molecules associated with SSc. The amino acid motif 71TRAEDLT77 on the DQβ1 molecule, reported in association with anti–topo I positivity in SSc in some Caucasian populations (14,17,19), was not increased among our patients with juvenile-onset SSc overall or in the dcSSc or lcSSc subsets. The DRβ1 amino acid sequence 67FLEDR71, described in 1 report as being increased in Caucasian patients with SSc (17), was not significantly increased in our patients with juvenile-onset SSc, although trends were essentially similar to what has been reported in adult SSc.

DISCUSSION

Although numerous studies of adult SSc have established the important role of the HLA class II region in genetic risk for SSc, only 1 has included juvenile patients, all of whom had dermatomyositis–scleroderma overlap (7). In this report, we describe the frequency of HLA–DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 alleles in Caucasian patients with juvenile-onset SSc, recruited from 3 pediatric scleroderma centers.

We first sought to determine whether, in Caucasian populations, patients with juvenile-onset SSc have HLA allele associations similar to those identified in adult patients with SSc. The most consistent and most frequently observed association across multiple different Caucasian populations of adult SSc is with DRB1*11, especially the DRB1*11:04 and *11:01 alleles (8,11,13,14). Some studies have shown an increase in frequency of DRB1*03 and others have demonstrated an increased frequency of DRB1*01, the latter primarily in lcSSc (16,18). The allele groups DRB1*07, and to a lesser extent DRB1*15, have been described as protective, or negatively correlated with disease (11,12). At the DQA1 locus, DQA1*05 has been associated with SSc risk, especially in male subjects (11,15). At DQB1, the *03:01 allele has been associated with risk, DQB1*02 and *06:02 with protection, and DQB1*05:01 variably with risk or protection, depending on the disease subtype or particular SSc autoantibody (18).

The first notable observation in our study of juvenile-onset SSc was that the frequency of the DRB1*11 alleles were not significantly increased. This is in contrast with multiple prior studies in adults as described above, and including a study of SSc in adult women in which DRB1*11:01 and *11:04 were significantly increased (8). Interestingly, the frequency of DQA1*05 was significantly increased in patients with juvenile-onset SSc. DQA1*05 is in linkage disequilibrium with DRB1*11 as well as with DRB1*03 and some other less common DRB1 alleles. This result regarding allele association in juvenile-onset SSc is similar to results of a prior study of adult men with SSc, in which DQA1*05 was significantly associated with risk whereas DRB1*11 was not (15). A similar observation of increased frequency of DQA1*05 in men has since been reported in another study (11). Thus, the genetic features of juvenile-onset SSc observed in the present study resembled those in adult male patients with SSc and differed from those in adult female patients with SSc in this respect. The frequency of DRB1*03 was also significantly increased in juvenile-onset SSc, but as it is in linkage dis-equilibrium with DQA1*05, it is not possible to determine whether one or the other locus is the primary association.

We further report a new observation. In our study population, the association of juvenile-onset SSc with DRB1*10 was the strongest and was evident in the different clinical subsets. To our knowledge this is the first description of an association of DRB1*10 with disease in an SSc population overall, as well as in a Caucasian population. It is noteworthy that in a study of a Chinese population, the frequency of DRB1*10 was increased in a secondary analysis restricted to ACA-positive patients (20).

The frequency of DRB1*07 and *15 allele groups was reduced in the patients with juvenile-onset SSc, suggesting a protective effect, although results were not significant for either allele group. This is consistent with findings in adults, in whom DRB1*07 is protective as described above, and in most studies of Caucasian populations (which also suggest the protective effect of DRB1*15). The increased frequency of DQA1*05 and DRB1*03 and the trend toward a decreased frequency of DRB1*15 in our study are consistent with the findings in a study from the UK that included 27 patients with juvenile-onset SSc with dermatomyositis overlap, although the frequency of DRB1*07 was not decreased in that study (7). Another HLA study included patients with localized pediatric-onset SSc, along with adults (9); although the results in the pediatric patients were not presented separately, none of the HLA associations with localized scleroderma were similar to findings in our study.

As previously shown in studies of adult patients with SSc, the current study of juvenile-onset SSc revealed an increased frequency of anti–topo I in patients with dcSSc and of ACA in patients with lcSSc. Interestingly, the prevalence of anti–topo I significantly decreased with increasing age at disease onset. The frequency of ACA was increased in children who were older at disease onset, but was low overall in juvenile-onset SSc compared to adult SSc, as has been described in other studies (46,10). Our ability to identify significant HLA associations with ACA and anti–topo I was limited; only half of the cohort members were positive for 1 of these auto-antibodies. However, DRB1*01 was significantly under-represented among patients with juvenile-onset SSc who were positive for anti–topo I, consistent with a similar observation in adult patients with SSc (18).

In summary, in the current study we identified HLA class II associations with juvenile-onset SSc, including one previously reported in adult male patients and dissimilar to findings in adult female patients. We also describe for the first time an association of juvenile-onset SSc with DRB1*10. Additionally, an age effect was observed for anti–topo I and ACA, as was an inverse correlation of DRB1*01 with anti–topo I. Overall, these results extend and confirm the importance of the HLA class II region in this disease.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge Judy Allen and Samantha Bell for coordination of the study and thank patients and family members for their participation.

Supported by National Center for Research Resources grant UL1-RR-025014 to the University of Washington Institute of Translational Health Science. Dr. Stevens’ work was supported by the Arthritis National Research Foundation. Dr. Nelson’s work was supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant 5-R01-AI-041721–12.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Feghali-Bostwick C, Medsger TA Jr, Wright TM. Analysis of systemic sclerosis in twins reveals low concordance for disease and high concordance for the presence of antinuclear antibodies. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:1956–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mayes MD, Bossini-Castillo L, Gorlova O, Martin JE, Zhou X, Chen WV, et al. Immunochip analysis identifies multiple susceptibility loci for systemic sclerosis. Am J Hum Genet 2014;94: 47–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Torok KS. Pediatric scleroderma: systemic or localized forms. Pediatr Clin North Am 2012;59:381–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Martini G, Foeldvari I, Russo R, Cuttica R, Eberhard A, Ravelli A, et al. Systemic sclerosis in childhood: clinical and immuno-logic features of 153 patients in an international database. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:3971–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scalapino K, Arkachaisri T, Lucas M, Fertig N, Helfrich DJ, Londino AV Jr, et al. Childhood onset systemic sclerosis: classification, clinical and serologic features, and survival in comparison with adult onset disease. J Rheumatol 2006;33:1004–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Foeldvari I, Nihtyanova SI, Wierk A, Denton CP. Characteristics of patients with juvenile-onset systemic sclerosis in an adult single-center cohort. J Rheumatol 2010;37:2422–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wedderburn LR, McHugh NJ, Chinoy H, Cooper RG, Salway F, Ollier WE, et al. HLA class II haplotype and autoantibody associations in children with juvenile dermatomyositis and juvenile dermatomyositis-scleroderma overlap. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1786–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Loubiere LS, Lambert NC, Madeleine MM, Porter AJ, Mullarkey ME, Pang JM, et al. HLA allelic variants encoding DR11 in diffuse and limited systemic sclerosis in Caucasian women. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:318–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jacobe H, Ahn C, Arnett FC, Reveille JD. Major histocompatibility complex class I and class II alleles may confer susceptibility to or protection against morphea: findings from the Morphea in Adults and Children cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:3170–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Foeldvari I, Tyndall A, Zulian F, Muller-Ladner U, Czirjak L, Denton C, et al. Juvenile and young adult-onset systemic sclerosis share the same organ involvement in adulthood: data from the EUSTAR database. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:1832–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arnett FC, Gourh P, Shete S, Ahn CW, Honey RE, Agarwal SK, et al. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles, haplotypes and epitopes which confer susceptibility or protection in systemic sclerosis: analyses in 1300 Caucasian, African-American and Hispanic cases and 1000 controls. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:822–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Simeon CP, Fonollosa V, Tolosa C, Palou E, Selva A, Solans R, et al. Association of HLA class II genes with systemic sclerosis in Spanish patients. J Rheumatol 2009;36:2733–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Dafni UG, Pakas I, Spyropoulou-Vlachou M, Stavropoulos-Giokas C, Moutsopoulos HM. Systemic scleroderma in Greece: low mortality and strong linkage with HLA-DRB1*1104 allele. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:359–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morel PA, Chang HJ, Wilson JW, Conte C, Saidman SL, Bray JD, et al. Severe systemic sclerosis with anti-topoisomerase I antibodies is associated with an HLA-DRw11 allele. Hum Immunol 1994;40:101–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lambert NC, Distler O, Muller-Ladner U, Tylee TS, Furst DE, Nelson JL. HLA–DQA1*0501 is associated with diffuse systemic sclerosis in Caucasian men. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:2005–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Luderschmidt C, Scholz S, Mehlhaff E, Konig G, Albert E. Association of progressive systemic scleroderma to several HLAB and HLA-DR alleles. Arch Dermatol 1987;123:1188–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Azzouz DF, Rak JM, Fajardy I, Allanore Y, Tiev KP, Farge-Bancel D, et al. Comparing HLA shared epitopes in French Caucasian patients with scleroderma. PLoS One 2012;7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beretta L, Rueda B, Marchini M, Santaniello A, Simeon CP, Fonollosa V, et al. Analysis of class II human leucocyte antigens in Italian and Spanish systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:52–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reveille JD, Durban E, MacLeod-St Clair MJ, Goldstein R, Moreda R, Altman RD, et al. Association of amino acid sequences in the HLA-DQB1 first domain with antitopoisomerase I autoantibody response in scleroderma (progressive systemic sclerosis). J Clin Invest 1992;90:973–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.He D, Wang J, Yi L, Guo X, Guo S, Guo G, et al. Association of the HLA-DRB1 with scleroderma in Chinese population. PLoS One 2014;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental

RESOURCES