Abstract
Stomatal movements are regulated by many environmental signals, such as light, CO2, temperature, humidity, and drought. Recently, we showed that photoperiodic flowering components have positive effects on light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis thaliana. In this study, we determined that light-induced stomatal opening and increased stomatal conductance were larger in plants grown under long-day (LD) conditions than in those grown under short-day (SD) conditions. Gene expression analyses using purified guard cell protoplasts revealed that FT and SOC1 expression levels were significantly increased under LD conditions. Interestingly, the enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening and increased SOC1 expression in guard cells due to LD conditions persisted for at least 1 week after plants were transferred to SD conditions. We then investigated histone modification using chromatin immunoprecipitation–PCR, and observed increased trimethylation of lysine 4 on histone 3 (H3K4) around SOC1. We also found that LD-dependent enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening and H3K4 trimethylation in SOC1 were suppressed in the ft-2 mutant. These results indicate that photoperiod is an important environmental cue regulating stomatal opening, and that LD conditions enhance light-induced stomatal opening and epigenetic modification (H3K4 trimethylation) around SOC1, a positive regulator of stomatal opening, in an FT-dependent manner. Thus, this study provides novel insights into stomatal responses to photoperiod.
Subject terms: Light responses, Stomata
Introduction
Plants need stomata in the plant epidermis for gas exchange between plants and the atmosphere, providing CO2 uptake for photosynthesis, O2 efflux, and transpiration. The movements of the stomata are regulated by various environmental signals such as light, temperature, CO2, drought conditions and pathogens1,2. Among them, blue light, red light and low CO2 act as a positive signal for stomatal opening. Blue light activates blue light receptor phototropins and blue light signaling component-mediated activation of plasma membrane (PM) H+-ATPase in guard cells3,4. In Arabidopsis thaliana, 11 PM H+-ATPase isoforms are recognized5, and all genes are expressed in guard cell protoplasts6. Blue light activates PM H+-ATPase by phosphorylating the penultimate residue, threonine, and 14-3-3 protein binding to the phosphorylated C-terminus7,8. Next, negative electrical potential was occurred inside the PM by blue light-activated PM H+-ATPase and inward-rectifying K+ channels induced K+ uptake through voltage-gated in response to the negative electrical potential. Finally, water potential changes turgor and volume in guard cells, leading to stomatal opening2,4.
In the early phase of blue light signaling pathway, a protein kinase, BLUE LIGHT SIGNALING1 (BLUS1), and type 1 protein phosphatase (PP1) have an important role between phototropins and PM H+-ATPase9–11. BLUS1 directly binds with phototropins in guard cells. Phosphorylation of BLUS1 by phototropins and kinase activity of BLUS1 are both essential for the PM H+-ATPase activation. PP1 is composed of both a catalytic subunit and a regulatory subunit. Both PP1 subunits may be involved in signal transduction from phototropins to PM H+-ATPase. Recently, BLUE LIGHT-DEPENDENT H+-ATPASE PHOSPHORYLATION (BHP), a Raf-like kinase, was reported as a novel signaling component for blue light-induced stomatal opening12. BHP interacts with BLUS1 but not with phototropins or PM H+-ATPase, and forms an early signaling complex with phototropins via BLUS1 in guard cells.
Furthermore, recent studies have indicated that mRNAs of photoperiodic flowering components, such as GIGANTEA (GI), CONSTANS (CO), FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF), and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1 (SOC1), are exist in guard cells and these components positively enhance light-induced stomatal opening in A. thaliana13–15. In addition, the well characterized blue light photoreceptor CRYPTOCHROME (CRY), which regulates photoperiodic flowering, has a function in the regulation of light-induced stomatal aperture via regulation of FT and TSF expression14. These findings suggest that photoperiod has a substantial effect on stomatal opening. Recently, Hassidim et al. (2017) reported that long-day (LD) conditions induce stomatal opening in A. thaliana 2 h before lights-on, but that short-day (SD) conditions do not induce stomatal opening before lights-on, and that the amplitude of the stomatal aperture is smaller throughout the day under SD conditions than under LD conditions16. However, to date, there has been no detailed analysis of the relationship between photoperiod and light-induced stomatal opening.
SOC1 gene encodes a multifunctional MADS box protein17–20 that regulates the timing of flowering, and floral pattern and meristem determinacy21–23. SOC1 expression is also mediated by FT in Arabidopsis guard cells14, and SOC1 acts as a positive regulator in light-induced stomatal opening15. The transcription factor MYB60 is specifically expressed in guard cells, and a null mutant of AtMYB60 exhibited reduced light-induced stomatal opening24.
In this study, we investigated the effect of photoperiod on light-induced stomatal opening in A. thaliana and found that LD conditions enhanced light-induced stomatal opening and SOC1 expression via FT and increased expression level of a PM H+-ATPase isoform, AHA5, in guard cells. We also determined that the enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening and SOC1 expression in guard cells by LD conditions persisted for at least 1 week after plants were transferred to SD conditions, and that LD conditions induced FT-dependent epigenetic regulation [trimethylation of lysine 4 of histone 3 (H3K4)] of SOC1, a downstream transcription factor of FT.
Results and Discussion
To clarify the effects of photoperiod on stomatal opening in response to light, we investigated light-induced stomatal opening in plants grown under LD and SD conditions. Kinoshita et al. (2011) showed that plants grown under LD and SD conditions differed significantly in shape13; therefore, we first established the conditions for plant growth. Plants were grown under SD conditions for 3 weeks, and then transferred to separate SD conditions for 2 weeks (SS) or to LD conditions for 2 weeks (SL); both groups showed similar leaf area, suggesting that there was no significant difference in plant growth (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 1). We then used these plants for further experiments. Stomata in the epidermis from both SS and SL plants showed light-induced stomatal opening, with SL plants showing significantly larger stomatal aperture than SS plants in response to light (Fig. 1b). We further investigated the light-induced increase of stomatal conductance in rosette leaves from SS and SL plants with a gas exchange system (Supplementary Fig. 2), and found that maximal stomatal conductance was 18% greater in SL plants than in SS plants (Fig. 1c). Note that photosynthetic activity of SL plants is significantly higher than that of SS plants during 10 to 30 min after the start of illumination, but there is no significant difference after 30 min (Supplementary Fig. 3). Under the same conditions, we detected no significant difference in stomatal density between plant groups (Supplementary Table 1). These results indicate that photoperiod is an important environmental cue regulating stomatal opening, and that LD conditions enhance light-induced stomatal opening without affecting stomatal development. Furthermore, we found that stomata in the loss-of-function mutant of FT, ft-225, did not show LD-dependent enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening (Fig. 1d), indicating that this process is mediated by FT.
Figure 1.
Long-day (LD) conditions enhanced light-induced stomatal opening via FT. (a) Summary of plant growth conditions. SS: short-day (SD) conditions for 5 weeks; SL: SD conditions for 3 weeks followed by LD conditions for 2 weeks; SSS: SD conditions for 6 weeks; SLL: SD conditions for 3 weeks followed by LD conditions for 3 weeks; SLS: SD conditions for 3 weeks followed by LD conditions for 2 weeks and SD conditions for 1 week. (b) Light-induced stomatal opening in epidermis from SS and SL plants. Stomatal apertures were determined 3 h after the start of light illumination or in darkness. Data are means of three independent experiments ± standard error (SE) (two-sided Student’s t-test, *P = 0.014). (c) Light-induced increase in stomatal conductance in intact leaves from SS and SL plants. Maximal stomatal conductance was calculated as the average conductance from 100 to 120 min after the start of light illumination. Data are means of four measurements in SS and SL plants ± SE (two-sided Student’s t-test, *P = 0.048). (d) Light-induced stomatal opening in epidermis of ft-2 mutant plants. Data are means of three independent experiments ± SE. Circles in (b,d) indicate means of 25 stomatal apertures, with five epidermal fragments for each experiment.
To clarify the mechanism of stomatal regulation by photoperiod, we first analyzed gene expression in guard cell protoplasts (GCPs) isolated from SS and SL plants in the evening (at zeitgeber time [ZT]16) by microarray (Supplementary Data 1). As shown in Table 1, the expression of several genes including SOC1, FRUITFULL, ATRALF1, hypothetical protein, ATTSPO, CCOAMT, ATSUC1, and ATCKX5 was repeatedly increased in GCPs from SL plants, showing a greater than 2-fold increase compared with those from SS plants. Among these genes, SOC1, a multifunctional MADS box protein, has been reported to act as a positive regulator of light-induced stomatal opening15. We confirmed increased SOC1 expression in GCPs from SL plants using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) (Fig. 2a). In contrast, we observed no clear LD-dependent increase in FT expression by microarray, probably because FT expression levels were too low. Therefore, we conducted qRT-PCR analysis to detect FT expression, and found that FT was also significantly increased in GCPs from SL plants isolated in the evening (ZT16) (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, we found that the LD-dependent increase in SOC1 expression was severely suppressed in guard cell-enriched epidermal fragments from the ft-2 mutant (Fig. 2a). Together, these results suggest that SOC1 is involved in LD-dependent enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening downstream of FT.
Table 1.
Microarray analysis of guard cell protoplasts (GCPs).
| AGI No. | Name | SS | SL | Fold Change (SL/SS) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT2G45660 | SOC1 | 165 ± 12 | 787 ± 140 | 4.68 ± 0.53 | 0.012 |
| AT5G60910 | FRUITFULL | 290 ± 58 | 763 ± 82 | 2.73 ± 0.24 | 0.009 |
| AT1G02900 | ATRALF1 | 1376 ± 241 | 3061 ± 396 | 2.33 ± 0.39 | 0.022 |
| AT4G30650 | Hypothetical protein | 1871 ± 140 | 4155 ± 627 | 2.28 ± 0.43 | 0.024 |
| AT2G47770 | ATTSPO | 648 ± 171 | 1296 ± 122 | 2.27 ± 0.56 | 0.037 |
| AT1G67980 | CCOAMT | 328 ± 42 | 727 ± 129 | 2.18 ± 0.17 | 0.043 |
| AT1G71880 | ATSUC1 | 819 ± 87 | 1647 ± 46 | 2.08 ± 0.31 | 0.001 |
| AT1G75450 | ATCKX5 | 2805 ± 561 | 5465 ± 675 | 2.02 ± 0.21 | 0.039 |
Plants were grown under short-day (SD) conditions for 3 weeks, and then transferred to separate SD conditions for 2 weeks (SS) or to long-day (LD) conditions for 2 weeks (SL). GCPs from SS and SL plants were then used for analysis. Data are means of three independent experiments; significant differences were determined using two-sided Student’s t-tests, at a significance level P < 0.05. AGI, Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
Figure 2.
Expression of SOC1 and FT (ZT16). (a) Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis of SOC1 expression in guard cell protoplasts (GCPs) from Col and guard cell-enriched epidermal fragments from the ft-2 mutant. Data are means of three independent experiments ± SE (two-sided Student’s t-test, *P = 0.004). Circles indicate individual values of three replicates. (b) qRT-PCR analysis of FT expression in GCPs from SS and SL plants. Experiments repeated on three occasions yielded similar results.
SOC1 overexpression in guard cells enhances light-induced stomatal opening and increases expression levels of plasma membrane (PM) H+-ATPase isoforms15. Therefore, we analyzed the gene expression of GCPs isolated from SS and SL plants in the morning (ZT4) by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis (Supplementary Data 2), because light-induced stomatal opening is observed around ZT4 under growth conditions. The 21 genes including SOC1 that showed a greater than 2-fold change in expression are listed in Supplementary Table 2. However, to our knowledge, these genes except for SOC1 are not involved in stomatal opening and closing. We then analyzed the expression of genes involved in light-induced stomatal opening, which is mediated by several components including blue light receptors phototropin3, BLUS19, BHP12, PP1 (TOPP and PRSL1)10,11, PM H+-ATPase25,26, K+ channels (KAT1, KAT2, and AKT1)2,4, and MYB6024 (Table 2). Interestingly, the expression levels of BHP, AHA5, and AHA11 were repeatedly increased in GCPs from SL plants (Supplementary Fig. 4). In particular, we observed a marked increase in reads per million (RPM) of AHA5, which exhibited the second highest expression level among the AHA isoforms in the SS condition. We confirmed this finding using qRT-PCR (Supplementary Fig. 5). AHA5 was significantly increased in the GCPs of SL plants. Given that increased expression of PM H+-ATPase in guard cells increases the magnitude of light-induced stomatal opening27, it is possible that LD-dependent enhancement of stomatal opening in SL plants is at least partly due to an increase in the expression level of AHA5 in guard cells. Further research is needed to determine how SOC1 induces PM H+-ATPase isoform expression in guard cells.
Table 2.
Expression levels of genes related to light-induced stomatal opening.
| AGI No. | Name | RPM in SS | RPM in SL | Fold Change (SL/SS) | FDR | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT3G45780 | PHOT1 | 110 ± 60.9 | 129 ± 50.0 | 1.16 | 1.00 | 0.536 |
| AT5G58140 | PHOT2 | 269 ± 130 | 300 ± 54.5 | 1.12 | 1.00 | 0.639 |
| AT4G14480 | BLUS1 | 26.5 ± 17.7 | 15.3 ± 3.39 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.064 |
| AT4G18950 | BHP | 6743 ± 618 | 7537 ± 663 | 1.12 | 1.00 | 0.662 |
| AT2G29400 | TOPP1 | 54.8 ± 7.21 | 54.7 ± 5.86 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.977 |
| AT5G59160 | TOPP2 | 36.9 ± 9.20 | 37.2 ± 4.87 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 0.943 |
| AT1G64040 | TOPP3 | 135 ± 23.2 | 120 ± 13.3 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.560 |
| AT2G39840 | TOPP4 | 37.2 ± 7.15 | 36.0 ± 6.33 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.891 |
| AT3G46820 | TOPP5 | 18.7 ± 7.46 | 16.7 ± 6.15 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.685 |
| AT5G43380 | TOPP6 | 6.75 ± 5.26 | 3.32 ± 1.75 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.057 |
| AT4G11240 | TOPP7 | 24.8 ± 1.29 | 24.9 ± 0.32 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.935 |
| AT5G27840 | TOPP8 | 105 ± 18.3 | 96.9 ± 17.1 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.732 |
| AT3G05580 | TOPP9 | 153 ± 37.5 | 136 ± 22.4 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.594 |
| AT4G40100 | PRSL1 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | — | — | — |
| AT2G18960 | AHA1 | 681 ± 385 | 592 ± 100 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.642 |
| AT4G30190 | AHA2 | 271 ± 12.3 | 232 ± 17.3 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.464 |
| AT5G57350 | AHA3 | 15.4 ± 10.5 | 16.2 ± 8.72 | 1.06 | 1.00 | 0.881 |
| AT3G47950 | AHA4 | 1.33 ± 0.49 | 1.21 ± 0.50 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.809 |
| AT2G24520 | AHA5 | 507 ± 26.0 | 584 ± 44.4 | 1.15 | 1.00 | 0.481 |
| AT2G07560 | AHA6 | 0.02 ± 0.04 | 0 ± 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.229 |
| AT3G60330 | AHA7 | 1.67 ± 0.37 | 1.39 ± 0.25 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.560 |
| AT3G42640 | AHA8 | 6.00 ± 2.96 | 4.61 ± 1.71 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.412 |
| AT1G80660 | AHA9 | 4.64 ± 2.77 | 5.05 ± 2.06 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 0.795 |
| AT1G17260 | AHA10 | 1.45 ± 0.30 | 1.60 ± 0.19 | 1.10 | 1.00 | 0.725 |
| AT5G62670 | AHA11 | 8.99 ± 3.65 | 11.1 ± 5.21 | 1.24 | 1.00 | 0.432 |
| AT5G46240 | KAT1 | 105 ± 79.0 | 74.8 ± 34.1 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.432 |
| AT4G18290 | KAT2 | 103 ± 23.5 | 101 ± 8.43 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.312 |
| AT2G26650 | AKT1 | 24.7 ± 5.77 | 20.5 ± 2.34 | 0.83 ± 0.08 | 1.00 | 0.382 |
| AT1G08810 | MYB60 | 177 ± 134 | 112 ± 51.0 | 0.63 ± 0.15 | 1.00 | 0.170 |
The actual read counts were normalized by TMM normalization and converted to reads per million (RPM). Data are means ± SD of three independent experiments from RNA sequencing analysis of GCPs isolated at ZT4. False discovery rate (FDR) and raw p-value (P value) are calculated with edgeR.
Next, we investigated whether LD-dependent enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening persists when the plants are returned to SD conditions. We transferred SL plants to LD conditions (SLL) or SD conditions (SLS) for 1 week (Fig. 1a). SLL plants still showed enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening. Surprisingly, SLS plants continued to exhibit enhanced light-induced stomatal opening (Fig. 3a). We then investigated SOC1 expression levels in guard cell-enriched epidermal fragments from SSS, in which plants were grown under SD conditions for 6 weeks (Fig. 1a), SLL, and SLS plants using qRT-PCR. Consistent with the light-induced stomatal opening phenotype, SOC1 expression was higher in both SLL and SLS plants than in SSS plants (Fig. 3b). In contrast, FT expression was lower in SLS plants (Fig. 3b). These results suggest that guard cells of SLS plants memorize FT-dependent enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening and SOC1 expression under LD conditions for at least 1 week, even after returning to SD conditions.
Figure 3.
Light-induced stomatal opening and SOC1 and FT expression under different conditions. (a) Light-induced stomatal opening in epidermis from SSS, SLL, and SLS plants. Data are means of three independent experiments ± SE (ANOVA, one-sided, *P = 0.0434, **P = 0.0400). Circles indicate means of 25 stomatal apertures from five epidermal fragments for each experiment. (b) qRT-PCR analysis of SOC1 and FT expression in guard cell-enriched epidermal fragments from SSS, SLL, and SLS plants. Data are means of three independent experiments ± SE. Circles indicate exact values for each sample.
Epigenetic regulation is important for plant acclimation to environmental stresses and signals28,29, and trimethylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4) and acetylation of lysine 9 on H3 (H3K9) are important for the upregulation of gene expressions in response to drought stress and vernalization in plants30–32. Therefore, we investigated the status of H3K4 trimethylation and H3K9 acetylation on SOC1 by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR in GCPs from Col SS and SL plants (Fig. 4a). In SL plants, H3K4 trimethylation on SOC1 was increased; however, H3K9 acetylation was unchanged. Furthermore, the ft-2 mutant did not exhibit LD-dependent enhancement of H3K4 trimethylation on SOC1 in guard cell-enriched epidermal fragments from the ft-2 mutant (Fig. 4b). These results indicate that LD conditions induce H3K4 trimethylation on SOC1 in guard cells, and that this modification is mediated by FT.
Figure 4.
ChIP-qPCR analysis of SOC1. (a) ChIP-qPCR using GCPs from Col SS and SL plants. H3K4me3: ChIP using anti-histone H3 (trimethyl K4) antibody. H3ace: ChIP using anti-acetyl-histone H3 antibody. Data are means of three independent experiments ± SE (two-sided Student’s t-test, *P = 0.017). Circles indicate exact values for each sample. (b) ChIP-qPCR using guard cell-enriched epidermal fragments from ft-2 SS and SL plants. Primer pairs used for ChIP-qPCR cover 3–177 bp of the SOC1 coding region (Supplementary Table 3). Data are means of three independent experiments ± SE. Circles indicate exact values for each sample.
Long-day plants such as A. thaliana initiate floral induction under LD conditions33. The results of the current study clearly indicate that stomata open more widely in response to light via FT in plants grown under LD conditions than under SD conditions (Fig. 1b–d). We previously showed that enhanced light-induced stomatal opening induces increased photosynthesis and plant growth using transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing PM H+-ATPase in guard cells27. Together, these results suggest that the enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening by LD conditions may be beneficial to plants in the reproductive phase through providing much energy and nutrient supplied by increased photosynthesis and transpiration. It would be interesting to determine whether SD conditions enhance light-induced stomatal opening in short-day plants such as rice.
The transfer of plants to LD conditions for 2 weeks enhanced light-induced stomatal opening, FT expression, which altered H3K4 trimethylation on SOC1, and SOC1 expression in guard cells. Even when plants were transferred to SD conditions, the enhanced light-induced stomatal opening and SOC1 expression in guard cells were irreversibly retained for at least 1 week. We call this phenomenon “LD memory” (Fig. 5). These results suggest that H3K4 trimethylation on SOC1 in response to LD conditions is likely to lead to LD memory and enhanced SOC1 expression. However, it remains unclear whether FT-dependent H3K4 trimethylation on SOC1 is required to enhance SOC1 expression and light-induced stomatal opening. Further study is required to clarify the relationship between H3K4 trimethylation on SOC1 and the enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening. It has been demonstrated that temperature has a significant effect on FT expression, and that the bHLH transcription factor PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4) mediates temperature-dependent FT expression34,35. Therefore, it is possible that H3K4 trimethylation on SOC1 is an important mechanism to ensure a stable response under unstable temperature conditions.
Figure 5.
Hypothetical model of stomatal regulation under LD conditions.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that photoperiod is an important environmental cue that regulates stomatal opening. LD conditions enhanced light-induced stomatal opening and epigenetic modification (H3K4 trimethylation) around SOC1, a positive regulator of stomatal opening, via FT in A. thaliana guard cells. Our results provide novel insights for studies of stomatal physiology and photoperiodic flowering physiology in shoot apical meristem. Further research is required to clarify how FT induces H3K4 trimethylation on SOC1 and the physiological significance of LD-dependent enhancement of light-induced stomatal opening and plant LD memory.
Methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
A. thaliana gl1 [Columbia (Col), carrying the homozygous recessive gl1 gene] and Col were used as the wild type. The background ecotype of ft-2 is Col (introgressed)36. Arabidopsis seeds in water were incubated at 4 °C for three days and sown directly on surface of the soil. Plants were grown in soil in a growth chamber (CLE-303, TOMY) as shown in Fig. 1a. SD conditions: white light for 8 h (100 µmol m−2 s−1)/darkness for 16 h at 22–24 °C in 50–70% relative humidity. LD conditions: white light for 16 h (41 µmol m−2 s−1)/darkness for 8 h at 22–24 °C in 50–70% relative humidity. We used different light intensities for SD and LD conditions because these were the optimal conditions to obtain plants of the same size under the specified photoperiods.
Isolation of GCPs and epidermal fragments
GCPs and guard cell-enriched epidermal fragments were isolated from mature rosette leaves as previously described12.
Stomatal aperture measurements
Epidermal fragments isolated from dark-adapted plants in a basal buffer (5 mM MES-BTP [pH 6.5], 50 mM KCl, and 0.1 mM CaCl2) were illuminated with blue light at 10 µmol m−2 s−1 superimposed on a background red light at 50 µmol m−2 s−1 at room temperature for 3 h3. In each independent experiment, we measured 25 stomatal apertures in the abaxial epidermis (5 stomata per epidermal fragment) using a microscope. All data represent means of three independent experiments with standard error (SE). Light-emitting photodiodes (ISL-150 × 150-RB, CCS) were used as red and blue light sources for measurement of stomatal opening. A quantum meter LI-250 (LI-COR) was used for determination of photon flux densities.
Gas exchange measurements
Gas-exchange measurements were performed using the LI-6400XT system (LI-COR) according to a previously described method27. Briefly, mature leaves from A. thaliana plants were clamped in a standard LI-6400 chamber and illuminated from the adaxial side with white light at 150 µmol m−2 s−1 by a fiber optic illuminator with a halogen projector lamp (15 V/150 W) (Moritex) as a light source. Flow rate, leaf temperature, relative humidity, and ambient CO2 concentration were kept constant at 500 µmol s−1, 24 °C, 30–40%, and 400 µL L−1, respectively. Maximal stomatal conductance was calculated as the average conductance from 100 to 120 min after the start of light illumination.
Microarray and RNA-seq analyses
RNA samples were isolated from GCPs of SS and SL plants at ZT16 using an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). Labeling for each RNA (50 µg) was carried out with LIQA or LIQA WT (Agilent), according to the supplier’s protocol. We hybridized 1.65 µg of cRNA using the Arabidopsis Oligo 44 K DNA microarray chip (ver. 4.0, Agilent) at 65 °C for 17 h. Signals were scanned and normalized using the Features extraction software (Agilent). Data normalization was performed using the limma package in R software37.
For RNA-seq analysis, total RNA was extracted from GCPs collected from SS and SL plants at ZT4 using a TRIzol Plus RNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Complementary DNA libraries were constructed using a TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit v. 2 (Illumina) and sequenced using a NextSeq 500 system (Illumina). Base calling of sequence reads was performed using the NextSeq 500 pipeline software. Only high quality sequence reads (50 continuous nucleotides with quality values > 25) were used for mapping. Reads were mapped to Arabidopsis TAIR10 transcripts using Bowtie software38. Experiments were repeated three times separately. We obtained 12.6–16.9 million sequence reads per experiment. Normalization of read counts and statistical analysis were performed using the EdgeR package39,40. EdgeR was conducted by web tool Degust Ver. 3.1.0 (http://degust.erc.monash.edu). Obtained RPM values were further analyzed using Excel. To find up-regulated genes, low expression genes (cut-off: RPM < 3) were excluded and the genes that showed a greater than 2-fold change were filtered (Supplementary Table 2).
qRT-PCR analysis
Total RNAs extracted from GCPs and guard cell-enriched epidermal fragments were used for RT-PCR analysis as previously described13,14 using the primer pairs listed in Supplementary Table 3.
ChIP-qPCR analysis
ChIP was performed using anti-histone H3 (tri methyl K4) antibody (Abcam) and anti-acetyl-histone H3 antibody (Millipore). The amount of immunoprecipitated chromatin was determined by qPCR analysis as previously described41. The primer pairs used for ChIP-qPCR covered 3–177 bp of the SOC1 coding region (Supplementary Table 3).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
ft-2 (introgressed) was kindly provided by Dr. T. Araki (Kyoto University). This work was financially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research in Innovative Areas (nos. JP15H05955 and JP15H05956 to T.K., N.N., H.T. and T.S.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan and by a grant from the Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (T.K.).
Author Contributions
T.K., N.N. and H.T. designed the study. S.A. and S.T. contributed equally. S.A., S.T., N.N., Y.H., Y.W., T.S. and T.K. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. S.T., A.S., N.N. and T.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Data Availability
RNAseq data that support the findings of this work have been deposited in the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under accession number DRA006227. Microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE104436.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Saya Aoki and Shigeo Toh contributed equally.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-46440-0.
References
- 1.Kim TH, Böhmer M, Hu H, Nishimura N, Schroeder JI. Guard cell signal transduction network: advances in understanding abscisic acid, CO2, and Ca2+ signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:561–591. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shimazaki K, Doi M, Assmann SM, Kinoshita T. Light regulation of stomatal movement. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:219–247. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kinoshita T, et al. phot1 and phot2 mediate blue light regulation of stomatal opening. Nature. 2001;414:656–660. doi: 10.1038/414656a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Inoue S, Kinoshita T. Blue light regulation of stomatal opening and the plasma membrane H+-ATPase. Plant Physiol. 2017;174:531–538. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Palmgren MG. Plant plasma membrane H+-ATPases: powerhouses for nutrient uptake. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001;52:817–845. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ueno K, Kinoshita T, Inoue S, Emi T, Shimazaki K. Biochemical characterization of plasma membrane H+-ATPase activation in guard cell protoplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana in response to blue light. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46:955–963. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kinoshita T, Shimazaki K. Blue light activates the plasma membrane H+-ATPase by phosphorylation of the C-terminus in stomatal guard cells. EMBO J. 1999;18:5548–5558. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.20.5548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kinoshita T, Shimazaki K. Biochemical evidence for the requirement of 14-3-3 protein binding in activation of the guard-cell plasma membrane H+-ATPase by blue light. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002;43:1359–1365. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcf167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Takemiya A, et al. Phosphorylation of BLUS1 kinase by phototropins is a primary step in stomatal opening. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2094. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takemiya A, Kinoshita T, Asanuma M, Shimazaki K. Protein phosphatase 1 positively regulates stomatal opening in response to blue light in Vicia faba. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:13549–13554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602503103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Takemiya A, Yamauchi S, Yano T, Ariyoshi C, Shimazaki K. Identification of a regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 1, which mediates blue light signaling for stomatal opening. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54:24–35. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hayashi M, Inoue S, Ueno Y, Kinoshita T. A Raf-like protein kinase BHP mediates blue light-dependent stomatal opening. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45586. doi: 10.1038/srep45586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kinoshita T, et al. FLOWERING LOCUS T regulates stomatal opening. Curr Biol. 2011;21:1232–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ando E, et al. TWIN SISTER OF FT, GIGANTEA, and CONSTANS have a positive but indirect effect on blue light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 2013;162:1529–1538. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.217984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kimura Y, et al. A flowering integrator, SOC1, affects stomatal opening in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56:640–649. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hassidim M, et al. CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) and the circadian control of stomatal aperture. Plant Physiol. 2017;175:1864–1877. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Borner R, et al. A MADS domain gene involved in the transition to flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2000;24:591–599. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00906.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee H, et al. The AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 MADS domain protein integrates floral inductive pathways in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2366–2376. doi: 10.1101/gad.813600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Onouchi H, Igeno MI, Perilleux C, Graves K, Coupland G. Mutagenesis of plants overexpressing CONSTANS demonstrates novel interactions among Arabidopsis flowering-time genes. Plant Cell. 2000;12:885–900. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.6.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Samach A, et al. Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science. 2000;288:1613–1616. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5471.1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Melzer S, et al. Flowering-time genes modulate meristem determinacy and growth form in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1489–1492. doi: 10.1038/ng.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu C, Xi W, Shen L, Tan C, Yu H. Regulation of floral patterning by flowering time genes. Dev Cell. 2009;16:711–722. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee J, Lee I. Regulation and function of SOC1, a flowering pathway integrator. J Exp Bot. 2010;61:2247–2254. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cominelli E, et al. A guard-cell-specific MYB transcription factor regulates stomatal movements and plant drought tolerance. Curr Biol. 2005;15:1196–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Toda Y, et al. Oryza sativa H+-ATPase (OSA) is involved in the regulation of dumbbell-shaped guard cells of rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57:1220–1230. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yamauchi S, et al. The plasma membrane H+-ATPase AHA1 plays a major role in stomatal opening in response to blue light. Plant Physiol. 2016;171:2731–2743. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang Y, et al. Overexpression of plasma membrane H+-ATPase in guard cells promotes light-induced stomatal opening and enhances plant growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:533–538. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305438111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Baulcombe DC, Dean C. Epigenetic regulation in plant responses to the environment. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6:a019417. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lämke J, Bäurle I. Epigenetic and chromatin-based mechanisms in environmental stress adaptation and stress memory in plants. Genome Biol. 2017;18:124. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1263-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim DH, Doyle MR, Sung S, Amasino RM. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009. Vernalization: winter and the timing of flowering in plants; pp. 277–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zheng Y, et al. Histone deacetylase HDA9 negatively regulates salt and drought stress responsiveness in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:1703–1713. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Whittaker C, Dean C. The FLC locus: a platform for discoveries in epigenetics and adaptation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017;33:555–575. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Turck F, Fornara F, Coupland G. Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:573–594. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vinod Kumar S, et al. Transcription factor PIF4 controls the thermosensory activation of flowering. Nature. 2012;484:242–245. doi: 10.1038/nature10928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fernández V, Takahashi Y, Le Gourrierec J, Coupland G. Photoperiodic and thermosensory pathways interact through CONSTANS to promote flowering at high temperature under short days. Plant J. 2016;86:426–440. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Imura Y, et al. CRYPTIC PRECOCIOUS/MED12 is a novel flowering regulator with multiple target steps in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:287–303. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ritchie ME, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. EdgeR a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Anders S, et al. Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8:1765–1786. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nakamichi N, et al. Pseudo-Response Regulators 9, 7, and 5 are transcriptional repressors in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell. 2010;22:594–605. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.072892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
RNAseq data that support the findings of this work have been deposited in the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under accession number DRA006227. Microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE104436.