Abstract
Background
Inherited palmoplantar keratodermas (PPKs) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous and phenotypically diverse group of genodermatoses characterized by hyperkeratosis of the palms and soles. More than 20 genes have been reported to be associated with PPKs including desmoglein 1 (DSG1) a key molecular component for epidermal adhesion and differentiation. Mal de Meleda (MDM) is a rare inherited autosomal recessive genodermatosis characterized by transgrediens PPK, associated with mutations in the secreted LY6/PLAUR domain containing 1 (SLURP1) gene.
Methods
This study describes clinical as well as genetic whole exome sequencing (WES) and di-deoxy sequencing investigations in two Pakistani families with a total of 12 individuals affected by PPK.
Results
WES identified a novel homozygous nonsense variant in SLURP1, and a novel heterozygous nonsense variant in DSG1, as likely causes of the conditions in each family.
Conclusions
This study expands knowledge regarding the molecular basis of PPK, providing important information to aid clinical management in families with PPK from Pakistan.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s12881-019-0872-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Mal de Meleda, Palmoplantar keratoderma, SLURP1, DSG1, Mutation, Variant, Exome sequencing
Background
Palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) is a heterogeneous entity of both genetics and acquired keratinization disorder, which is characterized by persistent marked epidermal thickening of palms and soles [1]. Hereditary PPKs comprising an increasing number of entities with different prognoses, which may be associate with cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations [2].
Depending on different patterns of hyperkeratosis, PPKs are further classified into four distinct types: diffuse, striate, focal and punctate [3, 4]. So far, deleterious mutations in > 20 genes have been reported in pathogenesis of different forms of hereditary PPKs [3, 4]. In last few years, advent of cutting edge genetic techniques such as whole genome microarray scans and whole exome sequencing have incredibly accelerated the identification of disease causing variants in many genes involved in various inherited forms of PPKs, and thus significantly increasing understanding about intricate molecular mechanisms of heterogeneous disorders, consecutively aiding valuable genetic counselling and patient care [3].
Mal de Meleda (MDM), a type of transgradient palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK), is a rare autosomal recessive disorder. Luca Stulli, a Croatian born scientist in 1826 first described Mal de Meleda on the Adriatic Meleda island (now Mljet) [5]. The disease can feature other potentially disfiguring effects on the hands and feet that can severely impact function.
The disease onset is soon after birth and is clinically characterized by erythema, transgradients and progradients hyperkeratosis of palms and soles with well demarcated borders and hypohydrosis. Other associated features are brachydactyly, nail abnormalities and lichenoid plaques [6]. Rigorous keratoderma can lead to deformity in hands and feet and gradually this may results into severe impairment [7, 8].
Furthermore, previous reports have shown that MDM may be caused due to mutations in the SLURP1 gene (previously known as ARS-B gene) encoding a secreted toxin-like mammalian lymphocyte antigen 6/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor-related protein 1(SLURP1). Expression of SLURP1 is reported in epithelium, stomach, sensory nerve cells, gums, esophagus and immune cells with highest level in keratinocytes especially in palms and soles [9–11].
Striate PPK type I is a rare type of PPK and shows the autosomal dominant mode of inheritance associated with DGS1 heterozygous mutation. Clinical features of this condition are linear hyperkeratotic lesions on the palms extending along the length of fingers and associated with thick patches of diffuse hyperkeratosis on the soles [12].
Heterozygous mutation in DSG1 gene in an autosomal dominant pattern have also been reported in focal PPK in a Libyan family, and in a Jewish Yemenite family with diffuse PPK [13, 14], a discovery which elucidates that different patterns of palmoplantar involvement may result from mutations in the DSG1 gene. Additionally, bi-allelic mutations in DSG1 gene have also been recently reported in the severe SAM syndrome, characterized by sinusitis, palmoplantar keratoderma, erythroderma, multiple allergies and metabolic defects, with heterozygous mutation carriers only presenting hyperkeratotic palmoplantar lesions [15].
Here we report findings regarding investigations of two families from Pakistan with clinically-defined PPK, for which the specific genetic basis was unclear.
Methods
Genetic studies
The research work presented in this manuscript was approved by the Ethical Review Boards Committee at International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan (IIUI; Pakistan). Informed written consent was obtained for all participants for the collection of blood samples, with clinical evaluations and family histories performed by a dermatologist. Extraction of high quality genomic DNA from the whole blood was carried out by using the ReliaPrep™ kit (Blood gDNA Miniprep System, Promega) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was undertaken on a NextSeq500 (Illumina, CA, San Diego, USA) with targeting using Agilent Sure select Whole Exome v6. The reads were aligned using BWA-MEM (v0.7.12), with mate-pairs fixed and duplicates removed using Picard (v1.129). InDel realignment and base quality recalibration were performed using GATK (v3.4–46). SNVs and InDels were detected using GATK Haplotype Caller or SnpEff tool (http://snpeff.sourceforge.net/SnpEff_manual.html), and annotated using Alamut batch (v1.4.4). Read depth was determined for the whole exome using GATK Depth of Coverage.
Primer3 web software was used to design the allele-specific primers (primer sequences are available upon request) to validate and verify the segregation of identified variants via Sanger sequencing. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for all affected and healthy individuals of recruited families by using allele-specific primers following standard conditions, with products sequenced by Source Bio-Science Life Sciences (https://www.sourcebioscience.com/).
Results
Subjects
Pedigree analysis was indicative of an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern of family 1, and an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance of family 2 (Fig. 1). All 12 living affected individuals with PPK as well as 6 unaffected (healthy) individuals including parents and siblings from both families (Family 1 and 2) were investigated. The seven affected individuals from family 1:IV:7, IV:8, IV:12, V:2, V:4, V:8 and V:9 were 27, 22, 45, 16, 11, 15 and 13 years of age respectively at the time of examination, while the five affected individuals from family 2: III:2, III:5, III:6, IV:1 and IV:2 were 28, 36, 40, 12 and 8 years of age respectively. On the basis of basic clinical dermatological examination, PPK was the main finding exhibit in all patients (affected members) of the recruited families.
Fig. 1.
SLURP1 Chr8(GRCh37):g.143823760C > T; c.44C > T; p.Trp15 (Family 1). DSG1 Chr18(GRCh37):g.28906885C > T; c.133C > T; p.Arg45* (Family 2). a, e Simplified pedigrees of the extended Pakistani families investigated with genotypes of affected and unaffected ndividuals. b Electropherograms showing the DNA sequence at the position of SLURP1 c.44 C > T in a heterozygous healthy carrier and homozygous affected individual. c-d Palmoplantar keratoderma in an individual homozygous for SLURP1 c.44 C > T. f Electropherograms showing the DNA sequence at the position of DSG1 c.133C > T in a wild type control and heterozygous affected individual. g-h Palmoplantar Keratoderma in an individual heterozygous for DSG1 c.133C > T
Disease onset was from 3 months to 1 year. Affected individuals of family 1 show cuff-like pattern with well demarcated margins and waxy yellow tone on hands and feet. Diffuse hyperkeratosis of hand and feet was common in patients. Fingers were tapered towards the tips and flexion deformity due to contractures was observed in 2 (IV:7 and IV:8) patients. Knuckle pads were observed in interphalangeal joints and hyperhidrosis was also common in all patients. Patients in family 2 showed diffuse hyperkeratosis with cracks and fissuring of the volar surface of the digits of hands and soles, toes were observed in two siblings. All other patients have mild hyperkeratosis. Mild to severe deafness was observed in patients and one patient (III:5) was deaf as well as mute. Both families’ phenotypes are summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 1.
Table 1.
Clinical phenotypes of study participants of family 1 and 2
| Family 1 | Family 2 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals | IV:7 | IV:8 | IV:12 | V:2 | V:4 | V:8 | V:9 | III:2 | III:5 | III:6 | IV:1 | IV:2 |
| Age | 27 years | 22 years | 45 Years | 16 years | 11 years | 15 years | 13 years | 28 years | 36 years | 40 years | 12 years | 8 years |
| Sex | F | F | F | M | M | F | F | M | F | F | F | F |
| Disease onset | 1 year | 1 year | 6 months | 6 months | 1 year | 3 months | 6 months | By birth | By birth | By birth | By birth | By birth |
| Inheritance | Autosomal Recessive | Autosomal Dominant | ||||||||||
| Diffuse PPK | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Scale colour | Yellowish | Yellowish | Yellowish | Yellowish | Yellowish | Yellowish | Yellowish | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cuff like margins | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | – | – | – | – |
| Pseudoainhum | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cracked Hypekeratosis | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ++ | +++ | + | + | + |
| Deafness | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Mild | Complete | Mild | Mild | Mild |
| Speech abnormality | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Mild | Complete | – | – | – |
| Diffuse hyperkeratosis | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Severe | Severe | Mild | Mild | Mild |
|
Teeth, hairs and nails |
Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| Finger deformity | – | ++ | ++ | + | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | – |
| Hyperhidrosis | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cardiomyopathy | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
+ = presence of feature, − -absence of feature, +++ = present in severe form
All patients of family 1 and 2 were intellectually normal and hair, nail, teeth and cardiac anomalies were not observed in any of the patient. Disease conditions worsened due to aging.
Genetic findings
To identify the causative gene mutation, single affected individual from each of the family was initially selected to perform WES (subject IV:12 of family 1 and III:2 of family 2, Fig. 1) to generate a profile of rare and novel sequence variants, with regard to mode of inheritance in each of the families. After that, exome data was first reviewed to identify pathogenic variants in disease associated genes, filtering for highly likely deleterious (nonsense, frame-shift, non-synonymous exonic or splice-site) variants for comparison with allele frequencies in online genome databases (including the Exome Aggregation Consortium; ExAC, the 1000 Genomes Project and the Genome Aggregation Database; gnomAD). This identified a single candidate novel homozygous nonsense variant [NM_020427.2:c.44G > A; Chr8:143823760C > T (GRCh37)] in the first coding exon of SLURP1 gene (Fig. 1) in family 1. This variant leads to substitution of tryptophan by a premature termination codon and is at the evolutionary conserved position 15 (p.Trp15*). In family 2, a heterozygous variant [NM_001942.3:c.133C > T; Chr18:28906885C > T (GRCh37)] was identified in coding exon 3 of the DSG1 gene (Fig. 1), which is predicted to result in a premature stop codon (p.Arg45*). The SLURP1 gene variant in family 1 is not listed in online genome databases and segregates as predicted for an autosomal recessive form in family 1. The DSG1 gene variant identified of family 2 is listed in the gnomAD browser database in 1 Latino individual in heterozygous form out of 31,370 genomes, corresponding to a minor allele frequency of 0.00003188; both variants are summarized in Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2 alongside all other reported disease-associated SLURP1 and DSG1 variants.
Discussion
SLURP1 has been localized to the granular layer of epidermis [16], where it functions as part of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors found on keratinocyte cells as a pro-apoptotic protein [17]. Arredondo et al. [17] demonstrated that keratinocytes are stimulated by SLURP1 through nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, leading to decline in keratinocytes cell number, indicative of the inhibitory and regulatory nature of SLURP1. Therefore, when SLURP1 is non-functional, as seen in Mal de Meleda, severe hyperkeratosis results due to improper keratinocyte apoptosis regulation [8, 18].
We identified nonsense variant in family 1 which causes substitution of evolutionarily conserved tryptophan at 15th amino acid position in SLURP1 by a premature termination codon. Nonsense variant (c.129C > A; p.Cys43*) is also reported in exon 2 of SLURP1 gene in a Turkish family. Similarly another nonsense mutation (c.286C > T; p.Arg96*) is also found in exon 3 in Croatian family and is predicted to truncate protein synthesis via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay [19, 20]. Family reported in this study have same clinical features to previously reported Mal de Meleda families.
The SLURP1 gene mutation p.Gly86Arg is most often found in sporadic patients with MDM of Asian origin [21, 22].
So far 20 mutations in SLURP1 are reported to cause Mal de Meleda, a form of PPK (Additional file 1: Table S1,). c.44G > A; p.Trp15Term is the second variant identified in Pakistan apart from c.2 T > C, p.Met1Thr variant which was recently reported [23].
“Desmoglein” comprises of the two Greek words “desmos” for “tie” and “glein” for “glue-like.” Perturbations of desmoglein expression in the epidermis have been known to impact cell adhesion properties. DSG1 is distinctively located, just above the stratum germinativum, to be candidate of epidermis stratification and differentiation [24]. A study in which DSG1 was down regulated in skin culture confirmed the importance of DSG1 for directing those functions [25].
In all reported PPKs cases where DSG1 gene variants (frameshift or nonsense) have been reported, there is evidence that affected protein haploinsufficiency leads to the striate, focal PPK and striate PPK with wooly hair and cardiomyopathy. Haploinsufficiency is predicted to cause through nonsense mediated mRNA decay because of premature termination codons [26, 27]. Interestingly, a heterozygous DSG1 mutation has also been reported in focal PPK [13].
To date, 31 mutations (8 nonsense mutations, 14 frame-shift variants and 9 splice-site variants) in DSG1 have been reported to cause striate/focal PPK (Additional file 1: Table S2). In 2009, Dua-Awereh et al. reported five heterozygous variants (p.Arg26*; c.373-2A > G; c.515C > T; c.1266-3C > G and c.1399delA) in DSG1 gene in five families with autosomal dominant striate PPK [28]. Thus, c.133C > T; p.Arg45* variant identified in this study is the sixth mutation underlying dominantly inherited form of striate PPK in Pakistan.
MDM presented a consistently severe phenotype than Nagashima form of PPK. MDM shows progressive hyperkeratosis among all PPKs and causes flexion contracture and constricting band [29]. While, Nagashima PPK is characterized by non-progressive and mild hyperkeratosis and does not show flexion contracture and constricting band [30, 31]. Nagashima PPK is caused by biallelic loss of function mutation in SERPINB7 while, MDM is caused by SLURP1 gene mutation [20]. Therefore, MDM is genetically distinct from Nagashima PPK [32]. PPKs are diagnosed on the basis of differential diagnosis to find out the disease entity. Differential diagnosis of PPK is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Differential diagnosis of PPKs
| Name | Disease Type | Clinical Features | Histopathology | Gene |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mal de Meleda | Diffuse PPK |
1. Soon after birth 2.Severe diffuse yellow and waxy thick hyperkeratosis in a ‘glove-and-socks’ distribution 3.Sharp demarcation 4. Autosomal Recessive |
1.Nonepidermolytic pattern 2.Increased stratum lucidum 3.Prominent perivascular inflammatory infiltrate |
SLURP1 |
| Unna-Thost |
1.Soon after birth to early childhood 2.Diffuse yellowish thick hyperkeratosis with sharp demarcation at the volar border 3. Autosomal Dominant |
1.Epidermolytic pattern (perinuclear vacuolization and granular degeneration of keratinocytes in the spinous and granular layer) |
KRT1, KRT9 | |
| Greither Disease |
1.Soon after birth to childhood/adolescence 2. Diffuse red/yellow moderate to severe hyperkeratosis 3. Autosomal Dominant |
1.Epidermolytic pattern | KRT1 | |
| Nagashima PPK |
1.Mostly within infancy 2. Diffuse mild reddish hyperkeratosis, red rim; white spongy appearance after water exposure 3. Autosomal Dominant |
1.Nonepidermolytic pattern | SERPINB7 | |
| Striate PPK | ||||
| Striate Type I PPK | Focal PPK |
1.Childhood to adolescence 2. Linear hyperkeratotic distribution on palms and palmar surface of the fingers 2.Focal hyperkeratosis at trauma-prone sites on soles 3.Autosomal Dominant |
1.Hyperkeratosis 2. Widening of intercellular spaces in the spinous and granular layer |
DSG1 |
| Striate Type II PPK |
1.Childhood to early adulthood 2. Linear hyperkeratotic distribution on palms and palmar aspect of fingers 3.Focal hyperkeratosis at trauma-prone sites on soles 4. Autosomal Dominant |
1.Hyperkeratosis 2.Widening of intercellular paces and condensation of the keratin filament network in suprabasal cell layers |
DSP | |
| Punctate PPK | ||||
| Punctate PPK Type IA | Focal PPK |
1.Late childhood to adulthood 2.Multiple hyperkeratotic papules with central indentation 3.Worsening of papules upon exposure to water 4. Autosomal Dominant |
1.Hyperkeratosis and hypergranulosis with central epidermal depression |
AAGAB |
| Punctate PPK Type IB |
1.Late childhood to adulthood 2.Multiple hyperkeratotic papules with central indentation 3. Autosomal Dominant |
1.Hyperkeratosis and hypergranulosis with central epidermal depression |
COL14A1 | |
| Punctate PPK Type II |
1.Puberty to early adulthood 2.Multiple spiny keratosispits with keratotic plugs (late onset) 4. Autosomal Dominant |
1. Columns of parakeratotic corneocytes (cornoid lamellae) 2.Superficial epidermal depression where the granular layer is reduced or absent |
Unknown | |
| Punctate PPK Type III |
1.Adolescence to adulthood 2.Translucent hyperkeratotic papules, sometimes umbilicated, on lateral aspects of palms and soles 3. Autosomal Dominant |
1.Hyperkeratosis and hypergranulosis 2.Decreased number of fragmented elastic fibres |
Unknown | |
PPK, Palmoplantar keratoderma; SLURP1, Secreted lymphocyte antigen 6 (LY6)/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR)-related protein-1; KRT, Keratin;SERPIN7, serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 7; DSG1, Desmoglein1; DSP, Desmoplakin;AAGAB, Alpha- and gamma-adaptin-binding protein p34;COL14A1, Collagen XIV
Conclusion
The identification of a novel homozygous nonsense variant in SLURP1, and a novel heterozygous nonsense variant in DSG1, as likely causes of PPK in the Pakistani families investigated alongside a review of previously reported variants adds to knowledge of the molecular causes of these conditions. Additionally, the data here provides important information regarding the nature, spectrum and molecular basis of PPK in Pakistan, enabling early clinical intervention, increased awareness regarding inherited disorders present in a community, and aiding diagnosis and counselling.
Additional file
Table S1. List of candidate pathogenic variants in SLURP1 gene previously reported in association with Mal de Meleda. Table S2. List of candidate pathogenic variants in DSG1 gene previously reported to be associated with Palmoplantar Keratoderma. (DOCX 66 kb)
Acknowledgements
First and foremost, the authors would like to thank the affected individuals and their families for participation in this study. We also thank all of the clinicians and geneticists with whom we have collaborated for their input.
Abbreviations
- ARS-B
Arylsulfatase B
- DSG1
Desmoglein 1
- HGMD
Human gene mutation data base
- MDM
Mal de Meleda
- OMIM
Online Mendelian inheritance in man
- PPK
Palmoplantar Keratoderma
- SAM
Sinobronchial allergic mycosis
- SERPIN7
Serpin Peptidase Inhibitor, Clade B (Ovalbumin), Member 7
- SLURP1
Secreted ly6/plaur domain-containing 1 gene
- WES
Whole Exome Sequencing
Authors contributions
Clinical data was collected and collated by AA, while, WA and GVH provided the assistance in genomic DNA extraction. AA, CP1 (Claire Prince), CP2 (Chloe Payne), GVH, AHC, ELB, JF performed genetic testing, analyzed and interpreted the patient data. AA, AG and GVH drafted the manuscript. Study was supervised by ELB, AHC, and AG. All authors reviewed, read and approved the manuscript.
Authors information
Not applicable
Funding
This study was partially supported by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan by awarding International Research Support Initiative Program (IRSIP) (Grant No: 1–8/HEC/HRD/2017/7949, PIN: IRSIP 37 BMS 39) to AA and RILD Wellcome Wolfson Centre (Level 4), Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Exome/Sanger sequencing and analysis was carried out at RILD Wellcome Wolfson Center UK and was funded by HEC Pakistan and Wellcome Trust UK (to ELB).
Availability of data and materials
The patient’s non-sensitive datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethical Review Boards Committee of International Islamic University Islamabad, Pakistan, and the study was carried out in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (1964). Informed written consent was obtained for all participants, including minors (< 16 years of age) with parental consent, for the collection of blood samples with clinical evaluations and family histories performed by a dermatologist.
Consent for publication
Written informed consents were obtained for publication of clinical and genetic data from individuals > 18 years, while consent for individuals < 18 years of age were given by their parents or legal guardians.
Competing interests
WA is a member of the editorial board (Associate Editor) of BMC Medical Genetics. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Abida Akbar, Email: abida.phdbt24@iiu.edu.pk.
Claire Prince, Email: cp451@exeter.ac.uk.
Chloe Payne, Email: cp490@exeter.ac.uk.
James Fasham, Email: J.Fasham@exeter.ac.uk.
Wasim Ahmad, Email: wahmad@qau.edu.pk.
Emma L. Baple, Email: E.Baple@exeter.ac.uk
Andrew H. Crosby, Email: A.H.Crosby@exeter.ac.uk
Gaurav V. Harlalka, Email: gauravh12@yahoo.co.in
Asma Gul, Phone: +92-51-9019837, Email: gulasma@iiu.edu.pk.
References
- 1.Patel S, Zirwas M, English JC. Acquired palmoplantar keratoderma. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2007;8(1):1–1. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200708010-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Has C, Technau-Hafsi K. Palmoplantar keratodermas, clinical and genetic aspects. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016;149(2):3–142. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Guerra L, Castori M, Didona B, Castiglia D, Zambruno G. Hereditary palmoplantar keratodermas. Part I. non-syndromic palmoplantar keratodermas: classification, clinical and genetic features. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(5):704–719. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sakiyama T, Kubo A. Hereditary palmoplantar keratoderma “clinical and genetic differential diagnosis”. J Dermatol. 2016;43(3):264–274. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.13219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fatović-Ferencić S, Holubar K. The portrait and paper of a forgotten hero--Luca Stulli (1772-1828) and the mal de Meleda of yesteryear: a 175-year anniversary. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;116(1):198. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.00225.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bergqvist C, Kadara H, Hamie L, Nemer G, Safi R, Karouni M, Marrouche N, Abbas O, Hasbani DJ, Kibbi AG, Nassar D. SLURP-1 is mutated in mal de Meleda, a potential molecular signature for melanoma and a putative squamous lineage tumor suppressor gene. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57(2):162–170. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Itin PH, Fistarol SK. Palmoplantar keratodermas. Clin Dermatol. 2005;23(1):15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Perez C, Khachemoune A. Mal de Meleda: a focused review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016;17(1):63–70. doi: 10.1007/s40257-015-0157-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fischer J, Bouadjar B, Heilig R, Huber M, Lefèvre C, Jobard F, Macari F, Bakija-Konsuo A, Ait-Belkacem F, Weissenbach J, Lathrop M. Mutations in the gene encoding SLURP-1 in mal de Meleda. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(8):875–880. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.8.875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tjiu J-W., Lin P-J., Wu W-H., Cheng Y-P., Chiu H-C., Thong H-Y., Chiang B-L., Yang W-S., Jee S-H. SLURP1 mutation-impaired T-cell activation in a family with mal de Meleda. British Journal of Dermatology. 2010;164(1):47–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lyukmanova EN, Shulepko MA, Kudryavtsev D, Bychkov ML, Kulbatskii DS, Kasheverov IE, Astapova MV, Feofanov AV, Thomsen MS, Mikkelsen JD, Shenkarev ZO. Human secreted Ly-6/uPAR related protein-1 (SLURP-1) is a selective allosteric antagonist of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):0149733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rickman L, Šimrak D, Stevens HP, Hunt DM, King IA, Bryant SP, Eady RA, Leigh IM, Arnemann J, Magee AI, Kelsell DP. N-terminal deletion in a desmosomal cadherin causes the autosomal dominant skin disease striate palmoplantar keratoderma. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8(6):971–976. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.6.971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Milingou M, Wood P, Masouye I, McLean WH, Borradori L. Focal palmoplantar keratoderma caused by an autosomal dominant inherited mutation in the desmoglein 1 gene. Dermatol. 2006;212(2):117–122. doi: 10.1159/000090651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Keren H, Bergman R, Mizrachi M, Kashi Y, Sprecher E. Diffuse nonepidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma caused by a recurrent nonsense mutation in DSG1. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(5):625–628. doi: 10.1001/archderm.141.5.625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Samuelov L, Sarig O, Harmon RM, Rapaport D, Ishida-Yamamoto A, Isakov O, Koetsier JL, Gat A, Goldberg I, Bergman R, Spiegel R. Desmoglein 1 deficiency results in severe dermatitis, multiple allergies and metabolic wasting. Nat Genet. 2013;45(10):1244. doi: 10.1038/ng.2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Favre B, Plantard L, Aeschbach L, Brakch N, Christen-Zaech S, de Viragh PA, Sergeant A, Huber M, Hohl D. SLURP1 is a late marker of epidermal differentiation and is absent in mal de Meleda. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127(2):301–308. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Arredondo J, Chernyavsky AI, Webber RJ, Grando SA. Biological effects of SLURP-1 on human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125(6):1236–1241. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23973.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Grando SA, Pittelkow MR, Schallreuter KU. Adrenergic and cholinergic control in the biology of epidermis: physiological and clinical significance. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(9):1948–1965. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Muslumanoglu MH, Saracoglu N, Cilingir O, et al. A novel mutation in the ARS (component B) gene encoding SLURP-1 in a Turkish family with mal de Meleda. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155(2):467–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07288.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fischer J, Bouadjar B, Heilig R, Huber M, Lefèvre C, Jobard F, Macari F, Bakija-Konsuo A, Ait-Belkacem F, Weissenbach J, Lathrop M. Mutations in the gene encoding SLURP-1 in mal de Meleda. Hum Mol Gene. 2001;10(8):875–880. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.8.875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Taylor JA, Bondavalli D, Monif M, Yap LM, Winship I. Mal de Meleda in Indonesia: mutations in the SLURP1 gene appear to be ubiquitous. Australas J Dermatol. 2014;57(1):11–13. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang J, Cheng R, Ni C, Liang J, Yao Z. First mal de Meleda report in Chinese mainland: two families with a recurrent homozygous missense mutation in SLURP-1. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;30(5):871–873. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shah K, Nasir A, Shahzad S, Khan S, Ahmad W. A novel homozygous mutation disrupting the initiation codon in the SLURP1 gene underlies mal de Meleda in a consanguineous family. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2016;41(6):675–679. doi: 10.1111/ced.12864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hammers CM, Stanley JR. Desmoglein-1, differentiation, and disease. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(4):1419–1422. doi: 10.1172/JCI69071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Getsios S, Simpson CL, Kojima SI, Harmon R, Sheu LJ, Dusek RL, Cornwell M, Green KJ. Desmoglein 1–dependent suppression of EGFR signaling promotes epidermal differentiation and morphogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2009;185(7):1243–1258. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200809044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lovgren ML, McAleer MA, Irvine AD, Wilson NJ, Tavadia S, Schwartz ME, Cole C, Sandilands A, Smith FJD, Zamiri M. Mutations in desmoglein1 cause diverse inherited palmoplantar keratoderma phenotypes:implications for genetic screening. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(5):1345–1350. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vodo D., O'Toole E.A., Malchin N., Lahav A., Adir N., Sarig O., Green K.J., Smith F.J.D., Sprecher E. Striate palmoplantar keratoderma resulting from a missense mutation in DSG1. British Journal of Dermatology. 2018;179(3):755–757. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hovorka O. E. Ehlers Mal de Meleda. Arch Dermatol Res. 1897;40:251–256. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mitsuhashi Y, Hashimato I. Keratosis palmoplantaris Nagashima. Dermatol. 1989;179:231. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kabashima K, Sakabe JI, Yamada Y, Tokura Y. “Nagashima-type” keratosis as a novel entity in the palmoplantar keratoderma category. Arch Dermatol 2008;144(3):375–379. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Kubo A, Shiohama A, Sasaki T, Nakabayashi K, Kawasaki H, Atsugi T, Sato S, Shimizu A, Mikami S, Tanizaki H, Uchiyama M. Mutations in SERPINB7, encoding a member of the serine protease inhibitor superfamily, cause Nagashima-type palmoplantar keratosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;93(5):945–956. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dua-Awereh MB, Shimomura Y, Kraemer L, Wajid M, Christiano AM. Mutations in the desmoglein 1 gene in five Pakistani families with striate palmoplantar keratoderma. J Dermatol Sci. 2009;53(3):192–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2008.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1. List of candidate pathogenic variants in SLURP1 gene previously reported in association with Mal de Meleda. Table S2. List of candidate pathogenic variants in DSG1 gene previously reported to be associated with Palmoplantar Keratoderma. (DOCX 66 kb)
Data Availability Statement
The patient’s non-sensitive datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.