Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226273

Organic carbon sequestration in sediments of subtropical Florida lakes

Matthew N Waters 1,*, William F Kenney 2, Mark Brenner 2,3, Benjamin C Webster 1
Editor: Dafeng Hui4
PMCID: PMC6910687  PMID: 31834911

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that sediments of temperate and tropical lakes are sinks for organic carbon (OC), but little is known about OC burial in subtropical lakes. There are questions regarding the ability of subtropical lakes to store OC, given their relatively warmwater temperatures, lack of ice cover, frequent water-column mixing, and labile carbon forms. We used 210Pb-dated sediment cores from 11 shallow Florida (USA) lakes to estimate OC burial, i.e. net OC storage, over the last ~100 years. Shallow Florida water bodies average ~30% OC content in their sediments and displayed rates of net OC accumulation (63–177 g C m-2 a-1) that are similar to natural temperate lakes, but lower than temperate agricultural impoundments. We considered the influence of lake morphometry on OC storage in our study lakes, but did not observe an inverse relationship between lake size and OC burial rate, as has been seen in some temperate lake districts. We did, however, find an inverse relation between mean water depth and OC sequestration. Despite recent cultural eutrophication and the associated shift from macrophyte to phytoplankton dominance in the Florida study lakes, overall OC burial rate increased relative to historic (pre-1950 AD) values. Lakes cover >9000 km2 of the Florida landscape, suggesting that OC burial in sediments amounts to as much as 1.6 Mt a-1. The high rate of OC burial in Florida lake sediments indicates that subtropical lakes are important for carbon sequestration and should be included in models of global carbon cycling.

Introduction

As evidence for recent anthropogenic climate change has grown, there has been increasing interest in carbon cycling in the biosphere. Although inland waters were once viewed as short-term organic carbon (OC) storage areas or simple conduits for transport of terrestrial carbon to the coasts, their perceived role in carbon cycling has expanded, and they are now viewed as complex aquatic ecosystems that receive, transport, process and store both allochthonous and autochthonous carbon [1]. Many lakes that display negative net ecosystem production, i.e. community respiration>gross primary production, nevertheless accumulate OC in the sediments [2]. Lake sediments that accumulate organic matter are effective long-term sinks for carbon [3], and annual OC burial in lakes and reservoirs worldwide exceeds OC sequestration in ocean sediments [4]. OC burial in lakes also increases in response to human-induced eutrophication [5]. In agricultural impoundments, OC burial may be orders of magnitude greater than burial in natural inland waters [6].

Most research on OC burial in lake sediments has focused on higher-latitude temperate, boreal and Arctic water bodies, though there has been some recent work on OC burial in tropical lakes [7]. Few studies, however, have evaluated OC burial in subtropical aquatic ecosystems. Some attributes of subtropical lakes suggest that large amounts of carbon are fixed within their water columns each year. For instance, subtropical lakes in Florida are never ice-covered in winter, so they can experience high rates of primary production year-round [8]. Summer temperatures often exceed 30°C in surface waters, and temperatures rarely fall below ~13–18°C in the water column during winter. The same factors that lead to high rates of primary production, however, may lead to relatively low net carbon sequestration in sediments. For instance, high rates of decomposition may prevail at the high ambient temperatures. Furthermore, most lakes in Florida with large surface areas are shallow, zmax < 5 m. In such lakes, characterized by large fetch and shallow depth, the water column is wind-mixed regularly and remains oxygenated year-round. This also promotes breakdown of organic matter. But because some shallow Florida lakes are known to have thick accumulations (3–8 m) of organic sediments [9, 10], we sought to determine recent OC burial rates in some of these water bodies.

Gu et al. [11] showed an inverse relationship between latitude and δ13C of organic particulate material in lakes and hypothesized that carbon dynamics in lakes of warm and cold climates differ. In addition to temperature, the organic matter source influences OC degradation rate. Terrestrial (allochthonous) OC is more recalcitrant than carbon produced within the lake proper (autochthonous OC), and the former experiences slower rates of degradation [12]. Because both OC production and decomposition rates occur at high and variable rates in subtropical lakes, and may be influenced by many factors, it can be difficult to estimate long-term OC storage from results of short-term studies, e.g. daily measures of OC fixation, determined from oxygen production and respiration. Even longer-term studies, with durations of months, may lead to erroneous calculations of net, long-term OC storage. Paleolimnological techniques, however, can be applied in shallow, subtropical lakes to quantify OC storage over longer timescales. Such direct measures of OC accumulation on the lake bottom integrate time and avoid the vagaries of short-term variations in OC fixation and metabolism, which may be influenced by factors of short duration such as cloudiness, water turbulence, rainfall-mediated nutrient delivery, algal blooms, water-column oxygen depletion, etc.

Multiple paleolimnological techniques can be used to estimate OC burial in lakes. They range from the rapid, single-core method, to the intensive, whole-basin approach [13]. Recent OC burial estimates are typically derived from analysis of multiple 210Pb-dated sediment cores [5] and provide information about OC sequestration during the previous ~100 years, sometimes at sub-decadal temporal resolution. Alternatively, repeated bathymetric surveys can quantify recent rates of bulk and OC sedimentation by determining net sediment and OC accrual between survey dates [6]. Regardless of the technique selected, spatial heterogeneity in lake sediment deposition must be accounted for when estimating whole-lake OC storage.

We used 210Pb-dated sediment cores from previously published studies as well as newly collected cores to estimate rates of recent OC sequestration in 11 shallow Florida lakes (Table 1, Fig 1). We employed the whole-basin approach in Lake Lochloosa (23 km2) and the multiple-sediment-core approach in the other 10 lakes, which ranged in surface area from 0.1 to 75 km2. We used our data set of OC burial values in sub-tropical Florida water bodies to achieve three primary research objectives: 1) determine recent rates of OC burial in subtropical Florida lakes and compare the values to those from lakes at higher latitudes, 2) identify factors that influence OC burial in Florida lakes, as has been done in temperate lakes (e.g. lake size) [5, 6], and 3) assess whether there has been an increase in OC burial rates in Florida lakes as a consequence of recent cultural eutrophication.

Table 1. Limnological characteristics of the Florida study lakes.

Data are from Florida LAKEWATCH (http://lakewatch.ifas.ufl.edu/). Surface area (SA) is in km2, mean water depth is in m. Total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN) and chlorophyll a (Chl a) are in μg/L. *Mean water depth for Little Bonnet Lake was not reported.

DATES SAMPLED LAT (N) LONG (W) SA DEPTH TP TN CHL
BEAUCLAIR 1990–2012 28.8 -81.7 4.4 1.7 118 3647 162
BELLOWS 1998–2014 28.0 -82.4 0.4 1.7 91 2270 107
LITTLE BONNET 1999–2015 27.6 -81.5 0.3 * 24 1934 41
DORA 1990–2015 28.8 -81.7 18.1 2.4 69 3280 140
EUSTIS 1990–2015 28.9 -81.7 31.4 2.5 34 2046 55
GRIFFIN 1990–2013 28.8 -81.9 38.0 2.0 59 2860 117
HARRIS 1990–2012 28.8 -81.8 75.8 3.3 34 1707 51
LOCHLOOSA 1993–2015 29.5 -82.1 22.9 1.8 67 2290 81
SILVER 2000–2007 30.4 -84.4 0.1 2.4 9 313 3.7
WEIR 1990–2015 29.0 -81.9 23.0 5.1 12 810 13
YALE 1990–2015 28.9 -81.8 16.4 2.8 24 1665 31

Fig 1. Map showing lake locations in Florida, USA.

Fig 1

Inset maps show the entire continental USA and the Harris Chain of Lakes. Base maps include World Light Gray Base [19] and Unites States generalized [20].

Materials and methods

Lakes for this study were chosen to represent a range of size, nutrient concentrations, trophic state, and spatial distribution (Table 1, Fig 1). Most Florida lakes are shallow, so mean water depths were <6 m for all lakes studied. The number of cores collected in each lake was determined in earlier sediment studies that were designed to assess lake-wide deposition, and for which sediment OC data had been obtained. For each lake, soft sediment surveys were first conducted to identify optimal coring sites. For this study, Silver Lake was also cored to include a lake with a small surface area.

Sediment/water interface cores (1–2 m in length) were collected with a piston corer designed to retrieve undisturbed sediment profiles [14]. Cores were extruded in the field and sectioned at 4-cm or 5-cm intervals. These seemingly broad intervals were chosen to provide sufficient dry mass for multiple analyses, but do not compromise temporal resolution, given the relatively rapid linear sedimentation rates in these lakes. We stored the samples in low-density polyethylene cups in ice chests for transport to the laboratory. Sediment subsamples were weighed wet, dried, and re-weighed to calculate percent dry mass. Organic matter content was determined by weight loss on ignition (LOI) after combustion at 550°C for 2 h. We measured OC with a Carlo Erba NA1500 CNS elemental analyzer [15]. In cases for which OC in sediment samples was not measured directly, we converted LOI to OC by multiplying LOI by 0.469 [16]. We measured sediment total phosphorus (P) with a Bran-Luebbe auto-analyzer system, after persulfate digestion [17]. We determined sediment bulk density (g dry cm-3 wet) from the proportion of dry matter in wet sediment and proportions of inorganic and organic matter in dry sediment, using the equation of Binford [18].

Sediment cores were dated using 210Pb. We measured total and supported 210Pb activities, the latter estimated by activities of 214Pb and 214Bi, using low-background gamma counting with well-type intrinsic germanium detectors [21, 22]. Unsupported 210Pb activity was calculated as total 210Pb activity minus supported 210Pb activity. We calculated sediment ages using the constant rate of supply (CRS) model [23, 24], and propagated age errors using first-order approximations according to Binford [18].

OC burial rates at core sites were calculated by multiplying bulk sediment accumulation rates by the proportion of OC in dry sediment. We corrected OC burial estimates from individual core locations for sediment focusing [13] by multiplying the sedimentation rate by the ratio of the expected, regional unsupported 210Pb inventory (33.5 dpm cm-2) [25] to the observed unsupported 210Pb inventory. This correction was adjusted for cores from Lake Lochloosa, where whole-basin analysis of 13 210Pb-dated cores indicated that the mean unsupported 210Pb inventory was lower (21.3 dpm cm-2) than the putative regional value.

To determine modern OC deposition rates, a beginning date of AD 1990 was chosen as the onset of “modern” deposition. This date was chosen so that OC burial would reflect changes from recent eutrophication, but not be overly influenced by dense algal abundance or lack of sediment diagenesis in surface sediments. In addition, 210Pb-dated sediments were divided into AD pre-1950 and post-1950 deposits to evaluate the impact of eutrophication on OC burial. AD 1950 was chosen based on the fact that many Florida lakes experienced accelerated eutrophication around that time [2629].

Results

Average recent OC burial rates (past ~150 years) in shallow Florida lakes ranged between 63 and 177 g C m-2 a-1 (Table 2). The average for all lakes studied was 118 ± 41 g OC m-2 a-1, with the minimum and maximum values from individual cores of 54 and 259 g OC m-2 a-1, respectively (Table 3). In our study lakes, OC burial rate did not decrease with increasing lake size (Fig 2), unlike the relationship reported for temperate water bodies [5, 6]. We found, instead, that the OC burial rate in Florida lakes was inversely related to lake mean depth for all but three of our lakes (Fig 3).

Table 2. Number of cores per lake used in this study, organic carbon (OC) content (%) and modern OC burial rates (g OC m-2 a-1) in recent sediments of the Florida study lakes.

# of cores g OC m-2 a-1 OC (%) References
Beauclair 1 174 36.2 [27, 30]
Bellows 3 133 22.7 [31]
Little Bonnet 3 64 27.0 [32]
Dora 7 139 35.0 [33]
Eustis 7 141 31.2 [33]
Griffin 8 177 30.8 [34]
Harris 9 130 34.8 [27, 30]
Lochloosa 13 106 28.2 [35]
Silver 1 64 26.7 This study
Weir 3 65 32.2 [27, 30]
Yale 3 109 34.3 [27, 30]

Table 3. Organic carbon (OC) data for individual cores used in this study and means for each lake.

Lake Core Date of Collection Modern Burial Oldest Date FF-Corrected@ Modern OC Burial g m-2 a-1 After 1950 Oldest Date FF-Corrected After 1950 OC Burial g m-2 a-1 Before 1950 Youngest Date Before 1950 Oldest Date FF-Corrected Before 1950 OC Burial g m-2 a-1
Beauclair 2*+ 1999 1989 174.3 1956 129.6 1956 1895 54.8
Bellows B1 2010 1999 148.7 1948 209.2 1948 1878 100
B4 2010 1995 108.2 1958 161.2 1941 1892 57.4
B5 2010 2001 143.0 1956 172.4 1942 1912 101.8
Mean 133.3 180.9 86.4
Little B1 2008 1991 68.2 1949 53.4 1949 1886 246
Bonnet B2 2008 1990 63.5 1949 109.2 1949 1921 64.5
B3 2008 1993 58.4 1947 39.5 1947 1934 44.4
Mean 63.4 67.4 118.3
Dora 3H 1995 1984 141.4 1951 109.4 1951 1886 46.9
6H 1998 1988 134.4 1953 118.4 1953 1896 97.5
10H 1995 1985 128.6 1951 93.8 1951 1887 36.2
12H 1998 1988 140.2 1958 96.2 1945 1888 26.6
14H 1995 1985 131.4 1951 106 1951 1927 56.3
21H 1996 1987 142.4 1949 105.7 1949 1891 54.2
22H 1996 1985 152.3 1949 129.5 1949 1917 58.1
Mean 138.7 108.4 53.7
Eustis 3H 1998 1987 137.4 1951 154.6 1951 1890 92.8
11H 1995 1986 152.1 1955 91.8 1949 1887 44.8
13H 1995 1986 158.6 1951 131.8 1951 1885 55
16H 1995 1985 122.5 1953 93.8 1953 1895 70.9
27H 1998 1988 122.4 1958 76.2 1931 1882 22.2
28H 1996 1985 150.5 1952 116.7 1952 1888 51.7
29H 1996 1985 142.1 1953 105.6 1953 1889 46.9
Mean 140.8 110.1 54.9
Griffin 2H 1994 1984 143.2 1952 109.7 1952 1886 42.3
3H 1995 1985 70.2 1952 127.2 1952 1889 56.6
7H 1995 1985 259.3 1950 182.0 1950 1886 46.5
16H 1995 1982 176.6 1953 217.2 1953 1889 84.4
26H 1994 1985 148.1 1955 110.9 1955 1887 60.3
43H 1995 1986 200.2 1954 143.1 1954 1891 74.2
44H 1995 1985 241.5 1951 159.3 1951 1903 40.8
Mean 177.0 149.9 57.9
Harris 1 1999 1992 120.8 1974 101.8 1938 1899 180.5
2 1999 1991 136.4
3 1999 1990 120.1 1947 74.4 1947 1920 39.1
4 1999 1992 126.4 1958 88.7 1945 1895 72.6
5 1999 1987 121.3 1950 133.5 1950 1886 141.2
6 1999 1991 112.1 1950 72.6 1950 1898 53.4
7 1999 1990 131.0 1952 76.7 1952 1909 20.2
8 1999 1989 143.8 1950 105.8 1950 1888 106.8
9 1999 1991 158.5 1951 112 1951 1897 57.8
Mean 130.0 95.7 84.0
Lochloosa 13 cores 2006 1997 106.0
Silver 1 2011 1993 63.8 1967 56.8 1931 1881 20.9
Weir 1R 1999 1990 60.2 1953 46.2 1953 1893 53.9
2R 1999 1986 53.8 1961 43.8 1946 1887 65.1
3R 1999 1986 80.9 1960 70.6 1947 1889 41.6
Mean 65.0 53.5 53.5
Yale 1 1999 1990 102.7 1953 64.3 1953 1899 28.1
2 1999 1992 124.4 1968 89.6 1940 1889 21.3
3 1999 1987 99.1 1955 70.8 1938 1888 75.2
Mean 108.7 74.9 41.5

*Means used for figures in bold.

+For Lake Beauclair and Silver Lake only one core was used. As a result, the bold number for these two lakes reflects the calculated OC measurements for the single core instead of a mean.

@ FF-Corrected are OC storage values corrected for sediment focusing.

Fig 2. Lake surface area versus recent organic carbon (OC) burial rate for 11 shallow, subtropical Florida lakes.

Fig 2

Fig 3. Mean depth (m) versus mean recent (post-1950) organic carbon (OC) burial rate (g OC m-2 a-1) for the 11 study lakes in subtropical Florida.

Fig 3

Vertical bars indicate the standard deviations about the mean, based on the values derived from multiple cores in each lake.

Kenney et al. [35] used the whole-basin, mass-balance approach to determine historical P loading in Lake Lochloosa. Comparison of historical P loading to historical OC burial in Lake Lochloosa showed that OC burial increased through time as a two-phase linear function of P loading (Fig 4). When P loading was lower in the past (<2.7 T a-1), the lake was macrophyte-dominated and ΔOCburial/Ploading was 236. As P loading increased more recently (>2.7 T a-1), the lake became phytoplankton-dominated and ΔOCburial/Ploading declined to 83.

Fig 4. Historical phosphorus loading versus organic carbon (OC) burial in Lake Lochloosa, Florida.

Fig 4

Values were determined with the whole-basin, mass-balance approach, using 13 210Pb-dated sediment cores [35]. In that study, whole-basin OC burial was estimated by extrapolating measured values only over the area of the lake that contained recent sediments (~7 km2, or ~31%). Before 1964 the lake was macrophyte-dominated (blue circles) and after 1964 the lake was phytoplankton-dominated (green circles). Values corresponding to the basal date (1906), the date of the switch in primary producer community structure (1964), and the core collection date (2006) are indicated with arrows. OC burial was lower, but more efficient relative to P loading (i.e. ΔOCburial/Ploading) during earlier times when the lake was macrophyte-dominated, compared to more recent times when the lake was phytoplankton-dominated.

With the exception of Lakes Little Bonnet and Weir, nine of the 11 study lakes showed increased OC burial during recent decades (AD 1950 to present) (Fig 5). Among all the lakes, OC burial after 1950 averaged 92 ± 36 g C m-2 a-1, whereas the pre-1950 average was 61 ± 25 g C m-2 a-1, indicating a 51% increase across the time period. The timing of this increase in OC burial corresponds to the period of accelerated eutrophication in each system, and in many other shallow lakes throughout Florida [2629].

Fig 5. Boxplots of pre-1950 and post-1950 mean organic carbon (OC) storage rates (g OC m-2 a-1) in sediments of 11 study lakes in subtropical Florida.

Fig 5

Dates were determined by 210Pb measurements and application of the CRS model. Dates before 1950 include all datable core sections pre-1950. Lake abbreviations are as follows: Beauclair (BEa), Bellows (BEI), Little Bonnet (LB), Dora (DO), Eustis (EU), Griffin (GR), Harris (HA), Lochloosa (LO), Silver (SI), Weir (WI), and Yale (YA). Values for Lakes Beauclair and Silver reflect storage rates derived from a single core in each lake. The open circles above the Lake Dora and Eustis boxplots are points that fell outside the range of the upper quartile plus 1.5 times the interquartile distance.

Discussion

Sediments of shallow, subtropical Florida lakes are effective OC sinks and their OC burial rates (63–177 g C m-2 a-1) rank among the largest measured in natural aquatic ecosystems in the world [5, 6, 36]. Because lakes cover >9000 km2 of Florida’s area [37], when we apply our estimates of OC sequestration to water bodies throughout the state, we calculate a state-wide rate of total OC burial in lakes of 0.6–1.6 Mt a-1. Spatially heterogenous sediment distribution within some shallow Florida lakes [38] probably limits the area over which OC burial occurs. Nevertheless, Florida has >11,000 km2 of inland aquatic ecosystems (www.StateofFlorida.com), and if we include lakes, wetlands, rivers and springs, combined OC burial across all these freshwater ecosystems in Florida certainly amounts to nearly 2 Mt a-1. Even if our first-order approximation of OC sequestration in Florida water bodies is subject to error, some of which may be related to extrapolation to such a large area [7], the result indicates the importance of shallow subtropical aquatic ecosystems in global OC sequestration.

The mean OC burial rate for all 11 of the Florida study lakes was 118 g C m-2 a-1. This rate is lower than tropical systems of the Amazon Basin (266 g C m-2 a-1) [7] and temperate agricultural impoundments (>1000 g C m-2 a-1) [6]. Nevertheless, the numbers from Florida’s subtropical lakes are higher than values measured in many Arctic (6 g C m-2 a-1) [39], boreal (2 g C m-2 a-1) [40], temperate (33 g C m-2 a-1) [41], and tropical (24 g C m-2 a-1) [42] systems. Our subtropical lakes yielded OC burial values similar to those from temperate lakes in agricultural landscapes (64–200 g C m-2 a-1) [5].

Many factors influence OC burial in lakes. Such factors can be unique to individual water bodies and/or characteristic of entire lake regions. These can include OC fixation rates, which are dependent on nutrient concentrations, as well as conditions that affect bacteria-mediated decomposition of organic matter (e.g. temperature, oxygen, organic matter concentration). The specific composition of the OC and how the OC interacts with the mineral matrix [43] can also affect OC storage in the sediment.

The mean OC content of shallow Florida lake sediments is large (~30%) relative to OC concentrations measured in many inland aquatic ecosystems elsewhere. For instance, the OC content in sediments of subtropical Yangtze River floodplain lakes is <2% [44]. In Amazonian floodplain lakes, OC represents <10% of the sediment mass [7], and in nearshore marine environments and fjords, typical values are ~2.5% [45]. Many freshwater impoundments have OC concentrations in sediments of ~5% [6], and Sobek et al. [39] reported a value of <6% for natural lakes in other regions. Sobek et al., however, reported relatively high OC content (~25%) in sediments of three oligotrophic Swedish boreal lakes that accumulate predominantly allochthonous organic matter [39].

Subtropical Florida lakes, particularly those with large surface area, are shallow. Most have zmax <5 m and the organic matter that accumulates in them is predominantly of autochthonous origin [4650]. The difference between sources of OC in sediments of boreal Swedish lakes (terrestrial) and subtropical Florida lakes (aquatic) is not surprising, given the differences in climate, soil, topography and vegetation between the two regions. What is surprising, however, is the fact that OC burial rates in Florida lakes are larger than those in boreal lakes, where allochthonous OC in the sediment dominates. One might expect larger values in the boreal lakes, given the more recalcitrant nature of the allochthonous organic matter [12]. In addition, whereas some temperate lakes report similar OC burial rates [5], the mechanism of OC accumulation appears to differ, with terrestrial carbon constituting a larger portion of OC burial increases in temperate regions.

The OC content of Florida lake sediments is an order of magnitude larger than that of most lake sediments elsewhere, but the OC burial rate is within the range of OC burial rates for many lakes. Lower delivery of terrigenous inorganic matter to Florida lakes probably explains the discrepancy between OC concentrations in Florida lakes and lakes in other regions. The landscape of peninsular Florida displays low topographic relief and upland soils are typically sandy and well-drained [51], so common mechanisms for delivery of terrigenous material to lakes elsewhere, i.e. colluviation and alluviation, are largely absent in Florida. The relatively small contribution of allochthonous inorganic material to Florida lake sediments is exemplified by the Holocene sediment record from Lake Harris, in which the combined masses of organic matter, biogenic silica and biogenic carbonate account for 75% of the total sediment mass [49]. The organic-rich sediment dry mass is about 30% OC, but <25% is allochthonous inorganic matter. It would require a ~40-fold increase in the burial rate of allochthonous inorganic matter in Lake Harris to reduce the OC content of the sediment to a value similar to that in many lakes elsewhere (i.e. ~3%). Likewise, paleolimnological records from many Florida lakes show C/N molar ratios <12 during periods when the lakes were eutrophic or hypereutrophic, indicating algae and cyanobacteria were the primary constituents of sedimented organic matter [26, 52].

In north-temperate lakes, the OC burial rate decreases with increasing lake size [6]. This observation was attributed to greater inputs of allochthonous OC, relative to autochthonous OC, in smaller lakes. This trend, however, was not encountered in our study lakes (Fig 2). Because the flat landscape and well-drained soils of Florida [51] are not conducive to delivery of terrestrial material to lakes, input of allochthonous OC to Florida lakes is negligible, and there is thus no relationship between lake size and OC burial. Instead, OC burial rates in Florida lakes are influenced by autochthonous production, which is dictated by nutrient concentrations, and lake mean depth (Fig 3), with lower rates of OC sequestration at larger depths.

Recent increases in OC sequestration in temperate lake systems appear to result from a combination of greater terrigenous inputs and eutrophication [5], but cultural eutrophication appears to be the main factor driving increased OC burial in Florida lakes. The larger and shallower lakes in our study have the highest OC burial rates (Figs 2 and 3). The large surface area and shallow depth of many Florida lakes enables frequent sediment resuspension during wind events. During these events, sediment phosphorus (P) is returned to the water column (internal loading) in forms required by primary producers [53]. Because of frequent internal release of legacy sediment P, efforts to reduce external P inputs may have little impact on eutrophication [54]. For example, Florida’s Lake Apopka maintained eutrophic conditions, despite more than a decade of aggressive management strategies designed to reduce external P loading [55].

In Lake Lochloosa, the whole-basin, mass-balance approach shows that the OC burial rate increased with greater P loading, but as the lake shifted from macrophyte to phytoplankton dominance, the ratio of OC burial relative to P loading (i.e. ΔOCburial/Ploading) decreased. Macrophytes have more structural carbon than do phytoplankton, so the observed ratios of OC burial relative to P loading were consistent with the expected elemental stoichiometry of the prevailing primary producer community structure at the time the sediment was deposited [56]. The positive relationship between OC burial and P loading reflects the control of P input on primary productivity in lakes [57]. The observed link between eutrophication (i.e. greater P loading) and increased OC burial in subtropical Lake Lochloosa suggests that as lakes in cooler climates warm [58] and experience eutrophication [59], OC burial in those systems will also increase.

Measured, long-term OC burial rates in Florida lakes, determined by paleolimnological analysis, suggest that net OC production over short timescales is so small that measurements of net primary productivity in the water column (e.g. light-dark bottle or day/night measures of oxygen production) are inadequate to determine if these lakes are autotrophic (production>respiration) or heterotrophic (respiration>production) [60]. For instance, using the sediment records from our study lakes, we found the greatest OC burial rate in shallow (zmean = 2 m) Lake Griffin (~177 g OC m-2 a-1). That value, converted to an hourly, volumetric rate in a well-mixed, 2-m water column, is equal to about 0.02 mg OC L-1 hr-1. This estimate of net volumetric OC production rate represents the largest value in our data set, and most Florida lakes probably have even lower rates of short-term OC production. Because net OC production is near zero, and there is natural variability in the system, on any given day such a lake may appear to be either autotrophic or heterotrophic, depending on the short-term weather conditions. Dated sediment cores integrate long time spans and avoid the pitfalls of attempting to estimate OC sequestration in lakes using short-term analyses of water column variables that are subject to considerable natural variability.

In nine of 11 lakes for which we compared temporal shifts in OC accumulation, all but two showed an increase in OC burial rate after ca. AD 1950 (Fig 4), Lake Weir and Lake Little Bonnet being the only exceptions. Like Lake Lochloosa, the other study lakes experienced increases in primary productivity, which caused increased OC burial [27, 30, 33, 34]. We assume that the increase in labile OC burial resulted in an increase in bacterial degradation during the same period, suggesting that the original OC deposition was greater than the net OC burial measured, i.e. some OC was lost to diagenesis. Nevertheless, increases in OC sedimentation outpaced the degradation process, suggesting that productivity is the process that enables shallow subtropical lakes to permanently sequester OC in the sediments. The average OC burial rate calculated for the pre-1950 period in our study lakes (61 g OC m-2 a-1, Table 3) is still greater than the Arctic, boreal, temperate, subtropical, and tropical systems mentioned above [3942].

Conclusions

We used 210Pb-dated sediment cores from 11 shallow Florida lakes to estimate recent OC burial in these subtropical aquatic ecosystems. Sediments in Florida lakes have high OC content (~30%) relative to most natural inland water bodies, and are effective sinks for OC, with recent net burial rates of 63–177 g C m-2 a-1. Considering that Florida lakes cover an area >9000 km2, overall OC burial in these systems is large (~1.6 Mt a-1). Shallow Florida lakes differ from north-temperate lakes in that Florida’s subtropical water bodies did not display an inverse relationship between lake size and OC burial rate, as was encountered farther north. Shallower Florida lakes stored OC at higher rates than did deeper Florida lakes. OC burial rates in Florida lakes increased since ca. 1950 as a consequence of eutrophication, and the shift from macrophyte to phytoplankton dominance reduced the ratio of OC burial relative to phosphorus loading.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Organic carbon storage for Silver Lake, Florida.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank CL Schelske, J Escobar, and J Curtis for assisting with analyses and providing data. Rachel Fillingim and Avery Lamb aided in manuscript preparation.

Data Availability

All relevant data are in the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Cole JJ, Prairie YT, Caraco NF, McDowell WH, Tranvik LJ, Striegl RG, et al. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon cycle. Ecosystems. 2007;10:171–84 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lovett GM, Cole JJ, Pace ML. Is net ecosystem production equal to ecosystem carbon accumulation? Ecosystems. 2006;9: 1–4 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heathcote AJ, Anderson NJ, Prairie YT, Engstrom DR, del Giorgio PA. Large increases in carbon burial in northern lakes during the Anthropocene. Nat Commun. 2015; 10.1038/ncomms10016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gudasz C, Bastviken D, Steger K, Premke K, Sobek S, Tranvik LJ. Temperature-controlled organic carbon mineralization in lake sediments. Nature. 2010;466:478–481 10.1038/nature09186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heathcote AJ, Downing JA. Impacts of eutrophication on carbon burial in freshwater lakes in an intensively agricultural landscape. Ecosystems. 2012;15:60–70 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Downing JA, Cole JJ, Middelburg JJ, Striegl RG, Duarte CM, Kortelainen P, et al. Sediment organic carbon burial in agriculturally eutrophic impoundments over the last century. Global Biogeochem Cy. 2008;22: GB1018 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sanders LM, Taffs KH, Stokes DJ, Sanders CJ, Smoak JM, Enrich-Prast A, et al. Carbon accumulation in Amazonian floodplain lakes: A significant component of Amazon budgets? Limnol Oceanogr Lett. 2017;2:29–35 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kenney WF, Chapman AD, Schelske CL. Comment on The chemical nature of phosphorus in subtropical lake sediments. Aquat Geochem. 2015;21:1–6 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Danek LJ, Barnard TA, Tomlinson MS. Bathymetric and sediment thickness analysis of seven lakes in the upper Oklawaha River basin. St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, FL: 1991; http://www.sjrwmd.com/technicalreports/pdfs/SP/SJ91-SP14.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Larios Mendieta K, Gerber S, Brenner M. Florida wildfires during the Holocene climatic optimum (9000–5000 cal yr BP). J Paleolimnol. 2018;60: 51–66 10.1007/s10933-018-0023-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gu B, Schelske CL, Waters MN. Patterns and controls of seasonal variability of carbon stable isotopes of particulate matter in lakes. Oecologia. 2011;165:1083–1094 10.1007/s00442-010-1888-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Meyers PA, Teranes JL. Sediment organic matter In: Smol JP, Birks HJP, Last WM (eds) Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments, Terrestrial, Algal, and Siliceous Indicators, vol 2 Kluwer, Dordrecht: 2001; pp 239–269 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hobbs WO, Engstrom DR, Schottler SP, Zimmer KD, Cotner JB. Estimating modern carbon burial rates in lakes using a single sediment sample. Limnol Oceanogr-Meth. 2013;11:316–326 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fisher MM, Brenner M, Reddy KR. A simple, inexpensive piston corer for collecting undisturbed sediment/water interface profiles. J Paleolimnol. 1992;7:157–161 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Verardo DJ, Froelich PN, McIntyre A. Determination of organic carbon and nitrogen in marine sediments using the Carlo Erba NA-1500 Analyzer. Deep Sea Res. 1990;37: 157–165 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dean WE. Determination of carbonate and organic-matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary-rocks by loss on ignition—comparison with other methods. J Sediment Petrol. 1974;44:242–8 [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schelske CL, Conley DJ, Stoermer EF, Newberry TL, Campbell CD. Biogenic silica and phosphorus accumulation in sediments as indices of eutrophication in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Hydrobiologia. 1986;143: 79–86 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Binford MW. Calculation and uncertainty of 210Pb dates for PIRLA project sediment cores. J Paleolimnol. 1990;3:253–267 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Esri. “Basemap” [basemap]. 1:3,000,000. "World Light Gray Base ". September 26, 2011. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ed712cb1db3e4bae9e85329040fb9a49. (November 10, 2019)
  • 20.Esri. United States (generalized). Scale 1:3,000,000. November 11, 2018. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=99fd67933e754a1181cc755146be21ca. (November 10, 2019). Credits: Sources: Esri, TomTom, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau
  • 21.Appleby PG, Nolan PJ, Gifford DW, Godfrey MJ, Oldfield F, Anderson NJ, et al. 210Pb dating by low background gamma counting. Hydrobiologia. 1986; 143:21–27 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schelske CL, Peplow A, Brenner M, Spencer CN. Low-background gamma counting: applications for 210Pb dating of sediments. J Paleolimnol. 1994;10: 115–128 [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Appleby PG, Oldield F. The assessment of 210Pb data from sites with varying sediment accumulation rates. Hydrobiologia. 1983;103:29–35 [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oldfield F, Appleby PG . Empirical testing of 210Pb-dating models for lake sediments In: Haworth EY, Lund WG (eds), Lake Sediments and Environmental History. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis: 1984;pp 93–124 [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Baskaran M, Coleman CH, Santschi PH. Atmospheric depositional fluxes of 7Be and 210Pb at Galveston and College Station, Texas. J Geophys Res. 1993;98:20,555–20,57111539182 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kenney WF, Schelske CL, Waters MN, Brenner M. Sediment records of phosphorus driven shifts to phytoplankton dominance in shallow Florida Lakes. J Paleolimnol. 2002;27: 367–377 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kenney WF, Brenner M, Curtis JH, Schelske CL. Identifying sources of organic matter in sediments of shallow lakes using multiple geochemical variables. J Paleolimnol. 2010;44: 1039–1052 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Waters MN, Brenner M, Schelske CL. Cyanobacterial dynamics in shallow Lake Apopka (Florida, U.S.A.) before and after the shift from a macrophyte-dominated to a phytoplankton-dominated state. Freshwater Biol. 2015;60: 1571–1580 [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Waters MN. A 4700-year history of cyanobacteria toxin production in a shallow subtropical lake. Ecosystems. 2016;19:426–436 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schelske CL, Kenney WF, Whitmore TJ. Sediment and nutrient deposition in Harris Chain-of-Lakes. Final Report (SJ2001-SP7) to the St Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Florida, USA;2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gilbert D. TMDL Report Nutrients for Bellows Lake. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee;2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Escobar J, Whitmore TJ, Kamenov GD, Riedinger-Whitmore MA. Isotope record of anthropogenic lead pollution in lake sediments of Florida, USA. J Paleolimnol. 2013;49:237–252 [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schelske CL, Kenney WF, Hansen PS, Whitmore TJ, Waters MN. Sediment and nutrient deposition in Lake Dora and Lake Eustis. Final Report (SJ99-SP6) to the St Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Florida, USA;1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schelske CL. Sediment and nutrient deposition in Lake Griffin. Final Report (SJ98-SP13) to the St Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, Florida, USA;1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kenney WF, Whitmore TJ, Buck DG, Brenner M, Curtis JH, Di JJ, et al. Whole-basin, mass-balance approach for identifying critical phosphorus loading thresholds in shallow lakes. Paleolimnol. 2014;51:515–528 [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dean WE, Gorham E. Magnitude and significance of carbon burial in lakes, reservoirs, and peatlands. Geology. 1998;26: 535–538 [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Brenner M, Binford MW, Deevey ES. Lakes In: Myers RL, Ewel JJ (eds) Ecosystems of Florida. Orlando: University of Central Florida Press;1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Whitmore TJ, Brenner M, Schelske CL. Highly variable sediment distribution in shallow, wind-stressed lakes: a case for sediment mapping surveys in paleolimnological studies. J Paleolimnol. 1996;15: 207–221 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sobek S, Durisch-Kaiser E, Zurbrügg R, Wongfun N, Wessels M, Pasche N, et al. Organic carbon burial efficiency in lake sediments controlled by oxygen exposure time and sediment source. Limnol Oceanogr. 2009;54:2243–54 [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ferland ME, Prairie YT, Teodoru C, Del Giorgio PA. Linking organic carbon sedimentation burial efficiency, and long-term accumulation in boreal lakes. J Geophys Res-Biogeo. 2014;119: 836–847 [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dietz RD, Engstrom DR, Anderson NJ. Patterns and drivers of change in organic carbon burial across a diverse landscape: Insights from 116 Minnesota lakes. Global Biogeochem Cy. 2015;18: 2205–2217 [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alcocer JA, Ruiz-Fernandex AC, Escobar E, Perez-Bernal LH, Oseguera LA, Ardiles-Gloria V. Deposition, burial and sequestration of carbon in an oligotrophic, tropical lake. J Limnol. 2014;73: 21–33 [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Baldock JA, Skjemstad JO. Role of the soil matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack. Org Geochem. 2000;31: 697–710 [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dong X, Anderson NJ, Yang X, Chen X, Shen JI. Carbon burial by shallow lakes on the Yangtze floodplain and its relevance to regional carbon sequestration. Global Change Biol. 2012;18:2205–2217 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Smith RW, Bianchi TS, Allison M, Savage C, Galy V. High rates of organic carbon burial in fjord sediments globally. Nature Geo. 2015; doi: 10.1038.NGEO2421 [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Silliman JE, Schelske CL. Saturated hydrocarbons in the sediments of Lake Apopka, Florida. Org Geochem. 2003;34:253–260 [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Waters MN, Schelske CL, Kenney WF, Chapman AD. The use of sedimentary algal pigments to infer historic algal communities in Lake Apopka, Florida. J Paleolimnol. 2005;33:53–71 [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Brenner M, Hodell DA, Leyden BW, Curtis JH, Kenney WF, Gu B, et al. Mechanisms for organic matter and phosphorus burial in sediments of a shallow, subtropical, macrophyte-dominated lake. J Paleolimnol. 2006;35: 129–148 [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kenney WF, Brenner M, Curtis JH, Arnold TE, Schelske CL. A Holocene sediment record of phosphorus accumulation in shallow Lake Harris, Florida (USA) offers new perspectives on recent cultural eutrophication. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1): e0147331 10.1371/journal.pone.0147331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Arnold TE, Kenney WF, Curtis JH, Bianchi TS, Brenner M. Sediment biomarkers elucidate the Holocene ontogeny of a shallow lake. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(9): e0203801 10.1371/journal.pone.0203801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Brown RB, Stone ES, Carlisle VW. Soils In: Myers RL, Ewel JJ (eds). Ecosystems of Florida. Orlando: University of Central Florida Press, Orlando;1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Brenner M, Whitmore TJ, Curtis JH, Hodell DA, Schelske CL. Stable isotope (δ13C and δ15N) signatures of sedimented organic matter as indicators of historic lake trophic state. J Paleolimnol. 1999;22: 205–221 [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wetzel RG. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems (3rd ed). San Diego: Academic Press;2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Søndergaard M, Jensen JP, Jeppesen E. Retention and internal loading of phosphorus in shallow, eutrophic lakes. Sci World. 2001;1:427–442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Coveney MF, Lowe EF, Battoe LE, Marzolf ER, Conrow R. Response of a eutrophic, shallow subtropical lake to reduced nutrient loading. Freshwater Biol. 2005;50: 1718–1730 [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zimba PV, Hopson MS, Colle DE. Elemental composition of five submersed aquatic plants collected from Lake Okeechobee, Florida. J Aquat Plant Manage. 1993;31:137–140 [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Schindler DW. Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science. 1977;195: 260–262 10.1126/science.195.4275.260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.O’Reilly, Sharma S, Gray DK, Hampton SE, Read JS, Rowley RJ, et al. Rapid and highly variable varming in lake surface waters around the globe. Geophys Res Lett. 2015;42: 10.1002/2015GL066235.240-243 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Taranu ZE, Gregory-Eaves I, Leavitt PR, Bunting L, Buchaca T, Catalan J, et al. Acceleration of cyanobacterial dominance in north temperate-subarctic lakes during the Anthropocene. Ecol Lett. 2015;18:375–384 10.1111/ele.12420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bachmann RW, Hoyer MV, Canfield DE. Internal heterotrophy following the shift from macrophytes to algae in Lake Apopka, Florida. Hydrobiologia. 2000;418:217–227 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Organic carbon storage for Silver Lake, Florida.

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are in the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES