Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0231374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231374

Sex differences in fracture outcomes within Taiwan population: A nationwide matched study

Fang-Pai Chou 1,2, Hung-Chi Chang 1,2, Chun-Chieh Yeh 3,4, Chih-Hsing Wu 5, Yih-Giun Cherng 1,2, Ta-Liang Chen 2,6,7,#, Chien-Chang Liao 2,7,8,9,10,*
Editor: Yu Ru Kou11
PMCID: PMC7144979  PMID: 32271850

Abstract

Background and aims

Because the sex difference in outcomes of fracture was incompletely understood, we evaluated the post-fracture complications and mortality of female and male patients.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide study of 498,586 fracture patients who received inpatient care using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database 2008–2013 claims data. Female and male fracture patients were selected for comparison by using a propensity-score matching procedure. Age, low income, types of fracture, fracture with surgery, several medical conditions, number of hospitalization and emergency visits were considered as potential confounding factors. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR), the 95% CI of post-fracture complications and 30-day in-hospital mortality differences between women and men.

Results

Male patients had a higher risk of post-fracture pneumonia (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.83–2.11), acute renal failure (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.60–2.15), deep wound infection (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.51–1.77), stroke (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.49–1.67), septicemia (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.42–1.61), acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09–1.75) and 30-day in-hospital mortality (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.48–1.93) compared with female patients. However, a lower risk of post-fracture urinary tract infection (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.65–0.72) was found in men than in women. Male patients also had longer hospital stays and higher medical expenditures due to fracture admission than did the female patients. Higher rates of post-fracture adverse events in male patients were noted in all age groups and all types of fractures.

Conclusion

We raised the possibility that male patients showed more complications and higher mortality rates after fracture admission compared with female patients, with the exception of urinary tract infections.

Introduction

Fractures are an important public health problem that affects populations all over the world, especially hip fractures. The annual mean number of hip fractures was 957.3 per 100,000 for women and 414.4 per 100,000 for men in the United States [1]. A typical patient with a hip fracture spends US $40000 in the first year following a hip fracture for direct medical costs and almost $5000 in subsequent years [1]. Mortality, morbidity and a poor recovery after a fracture not only affect a patient’s activities of daily living but also cost a significant amount of money in medical expenses. Therefore, post-fracture outcomes and factors that affect the prognosis are important.

Some studies have found no differences in fracture outcome between genders [2,3]. A Finnish study has reported worse survival after fracture in female patients than in male patients [4]. In contrast, several previous studies have shown gender differences in short-term and long-term mortality, adverse outcomes and post-fracture functional recovery, mostly indicating that men, for unknown reasons, tend to have worse post-fracture outcomes than women [513]. However, many of the previous studies were limited by a small sample size [79,13], an absence of adequate matching [5,6,8,9,1113], and by focusing on single type of fracture [513] or a specific population [3,5,810]. These limitations made the interpretation about the association between gender and outcomes inconclusive and incompletely understood. In addition, limited information was available on the sex differences of fracture outcomes in Taiwan populations.

Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we conducted a nationwide matched cohort study that included all fracture patients from 2008–2013. The aim of our study was to compare the post-fracture complications of women and men.

Methods

Source of data

Taiwan’s National Health Insurance program was initiated in March 1995, and it now covers more than 99% of Taiwan’s 23 million residents. In this study, we used reimbursement claims data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database, which records patients’ basic characteristics and medical services. This information includes physicians’ primary and secondary diagnoses, treatment, procedures, prescriptions, the medical expenses of outpatient care, emergency care, and hospitalizations [1416].

The data underlying this study is from the National Health Insurance Research Database, which has been transferred to the Health and Welfare Data Science Center. Interested researchers can obtain the data through formal application to the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (http://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/np-2497-113.html). Under the regulations from the National Health Insurance Research Institutes, we have made the formal application (included application documents, study proposals, and ethics approval of the institutional review board) of the current insurance data from in 2015. The authors of the present study had no special access privileges in accessing the data which other interested researchers would not have.

Ethics approval

As these reimbursement claims were used in this study, the electronic database was decoded with patient identifications scrambled for further academic access for research to protect privacy. We conducted this study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Although the National Health Research Institutes exempt such uses from informed consent, because patient identifications are decoded and scrambled, this study was evaluated and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University (TMU-JIRB-201404070; TMU-JIRB-201505055; TMU-JIRB-201705084).

Study design

Among the >3 million surgical patients over 20 years of age in Taiwan between 2008 and 2013, we identified 498,586 patients with a fracture-related hospitalization. For the comparison of fracture outcomes between women and men, each female fracture patient was randomly matched to a male fracture patient, using a propensity score matched-pair procedure to balance the differences in baseline characteristics. After propensity score matching (case-control ratio, 1:1), there were 100,864 female patients and 100,864 male patients.

Measures and definitions

According to the regulations from the Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan, people with low-income status were qualified to have the registration fee and medical copayment waived when they received outpatient, emergency, and inpatient medical care. In this study, low socioeconomic status was defined as a patient who had a record of a waived registration fee and medical copayment due to low income during the 2 years prior to the fracture-related hospitalization. We used The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and physicians’ diagnoses to identify patients’ history of diseases. Based on our previous studies, pre-fracture medical conditions that were identified via medical claims for the 24-month pre-fracture period included hypertension (ICD-9-CM 401–405), hyperlipidemia (ICD-9-CM 272.0, 272.1, and 272.2), peptic ulcer disease (ICD-9-CM 531–533), diabetes (ICD-9-CM 250), mental disorders (ICD-9-CM 290–319), ischemic heart disease (ICD-9-CM 410–414), atherosclerosis (ICD-9-CM 440), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ICD-9- CM 491,492, 496), anemia (ICD-9-CM 280–285), heart failure (ICD-9-CM 428), chronic kidney disease (ICD-9-CM 580–585), cancer (ICD-9-CM 140–208), osteoporosis (ICD-9-CM 733.0), stroke (ICD-9-CM 430–438), and liver cirrhosis (ICD-9-CM 571.2, 571.5, 571.6). Renal dialysis was identified by an administration code (D8, D9). Nine major in-hospital complications after fracture were noted, including pulmonary embolism (ICD-9-CM 415), stroke (ICD-9-CM 430–438), pneumonia (ICD-9-CM 480–486), urinary tract infection (ICD-9-CM 599.0), septicemia (ICD-9-CM 038, 998.5), acute renal failure (ICD-9-CM584), postoperative bleeding (ICD-9-CM 998.0, 998.1 and 998.2), acute myocardial infarction (ICD-9-CM 410), and deep wound infection (ICD-9-CM 958.3). Length of hospital stay and medical expenditures after the initial fracture admission were analyzed as secondary outcomes, and differences were noted between female and male patients. The 30-day in-hospital mortality is the main outcome of this study. Fracture patient’s medical expenditure was calculated by accounting all National Health Insurance payment during the index fracture hospitalization included surgical procedures, medications, admission stay, and materials. However, self-payment expenditure (out-off pocket money) was not included in this study.

Statistical analysis

To reduce confounding errors, this study used a propensity score-matched pair procedure to balance the covariates between female fracture patients and male fracture patients. We developed a non-parsimonious multivariable logistic regression model to estimate a propensity score for female and male fracture patients. Clinical significance guided the initial choice of covariates in this model. Covariates included age, low income, medical condition, and type of fracture. A structured iterative approach was used to refine this model with the goal of achieving a covariate balance within the matched pairs. We used chi-square tests to measure covariate balance, and p < 0.05 was used to represent a meaningful covariate imbalance. We matched female patients to male patients using a greedy matching algorithm with a caliper width of 0.2 standard deviation of the log odds of the estimated propensity score [1719].

Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for 30-day complications and mortality after fracture between female and male patients were calculated in the multivariate logistic regression models by adjusting for age, low-income, medical conditions, and type of fracture. We also performed stratification analysis by age, coexisting medical conditions, and type of fracture for the risk of post-fracture adverse events (including 30-day in-hospital mortality, stroke, pneumonia, septicemia, acute renal failure, acute myocardial infarction, and deep wound infection) associated with sex. SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) statistical software was used for data analyses; 2-sided p < 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences.

Results

Before matching with propensity scores (Table 1), male fracture patients had higher proportions of young age of 20–29 years (p < 0.0001), low income (p < 0.0001), skull bone fracture (p < 0.0001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < 0.0001), and liver cirrhosis (p < 0.0001). However, male fracture patients had lower proportions of hypertension (p < 0.0001), hyperlipidemia (p < 0.0001), peptic ulcer disease (p < 0.0001), diabetes (p < 0.0001), mental disorders (p < 0.0001), ischemic heart disease (p < 0.0001), atherosclerosis (p < 0.0001), anemia (p < 0.0001), heart failure (p < 0.0001), and renal dialysis (p < 0.0001). After matching with propensity scores (Table 2), there were no differences in age, medical conditions, fracture type, and history of emergency care and hospitalization between female and male patients.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics in female and male fracture patients before matching.

Female (n = 249012) Male (n = 249574) p
Age, years n (%) n (%) <0.0001
    20–29 18582 (7.5) 44607 (17.9)
    30–39 17066 (6.9) 40456 (16.2)
    40–49 23655 (9.5) 43903 (17.6)
    50–59 46832 (18.8) 40764 (16.3)
    60–69 45149 (18.1) 26091 (10.5)
    70–79 52236 (21.0) 26683 (10.7)
    ≥80 45492 (18.3) 27070 (10.9)
Low income <0.0001
    No 243314 (97.7) 241805 (96.9)
    Yes 5698 (2.3) 7769 (3.1)
Types of fracture <0.0001
    Skull 2509 (1.0) 8027 (3.2)
    Face bones 7493 (3.0) 13988 (5.6)
    Unqualified skull fracture 618 (0.3) 2204 (0.9)
    Vertebral column 13445 (5.4) 9973 (4.0)
    Rib, sternum, larynx or trachea 1976 (0.8) 4539 (1.8)
    Pelvis 1729 (0.7) 2258 (0.9)
    Other ill-defined fractures of trunk 3 (0.0) 1 (0.0)
    Clavicle or scapula 14061 (5.7) 25743 (10.3)
    Humerus, radius or ulna 76446 (30.7) 48697 (19.5)
    Carpal, metacarpal, or phalanges 7550 (3.0) 21041 (8.4)
    Other upper limb 3 (0.0) 9 (0.0)
    Fracture of femur 67951 (27.3) 46733 (18.7)
    Fracture of patella, tibia, or fibula 27603 (11.1) 31760 (12.7)
    Ankle, tarsal, metatarsal bones, phalanges of foot 27424 (11.0) 34217 (13.7)
    Other lower limb 26 (0.01) 36 (0.01)
    Multiple fractures of upper limbs, lower limbs or trunk 174 (0.1) 342 (0.1)
    Fracture of unspecified bones 1 (0.0) 6 (0.0)
Fracture with surgery 176588 (70.9) 185034 (74.1) <0.0001
Medical conditions
    Hypertension 116198 (46.7) 74303 (29.8) <0.0001
    Mental disorders 50508 (20.3) 35379 (14.2) <0.0001
    Diabetes 56162 (22.6) 33988 (13.6) <0.0001
    Hyperlipidemia 56317 (22.6) 31595 (12.7) <0.0001
    Peptic ulcer disease 27841 (11.2) 21716 (8.7) <0.0001
    COPD 15387 (6.2) 20760 (8.3) <0.0001
    Ischemic heart disease 25223 (10.1) 17374 (7.0) <0.0001
    Atherosclerosis 18271 (7.3) 12759 (5.1) <0.0001
    Anemia 19319 (7.8) 10117 (4.1) <0.0001
    Heart failure 11142 (4.5) 6421 (2.6) <0.0001
    Liver cirrhosis 2203 (0.9) 3553 (1.4) <0.0001
    Renal dialysis 4310 (1.7) 2919 (1.2) <0.0001
    Chronic kidney disease 6736 (2.7) 5179 (2.1) <0.0001
    Asthma 13050 (5.2) 8763 (3.5) <0.0001
    Stroke 7505 (3.0) 6474 (2.6) <0.0001
    Cancer 12231 (4.9) 9184 (3.7) <0.0001
    Osteoporosis 13280 (5.3) 2756 (1.1) <0.0001
    Alcohol-related illness 1773 (0.7) 9390 (3.8) <0.0001
    Parkinson's disease 6616 (2.7) 4297 (1.7) <0.0001
Number of hospitalizations* <0.0001
    0 204202 (82.0) 208629 (83.6)
    1 29467 (11.8) 25947 (10.4)
    2 8674 (3.5) 7967 (3.2)
    ≥3 6669 (2.7) 7031 (2.8)
Number of emergency visits* <0.0001
    0 147898 (59.4) 145488 (58.3)
    1 61665 (24.8) 63513 (25.5)
    2 21878 (8.8) 23055 (9.2)
    ≥3 17571 (7.1) 17518 (7.0)

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

*Before fracture admission within one year

Table 2. Baseline characteristics in female and male fracture patients after matching.

Female (n = 100864) Male (n = 100864)
Age, years n (%) n (%)
    20–29 14965 (14.8) 14965 (14.8)
    30–39 12206 (12.1) 12206 (12.1)
    40–49 15635 (15.5) 15635 (15.5)
    50–59 24800 (24.6) 24800 (24.6)
    60–69 12237 (12.1) 12237 (12.1)
    70–79 10112 (10.0) 10112 (10.0)
    ≥80 10909 (10.8) 10909 (10.8)
Low income
    No 99769 (98.9) 99769 (98.9)
    Yes 1095 (1.1) 1095 (1.1)
Types of fracture*
    Skull 1391 (1.4) 1391 (1.4)
    Face bones 4872 (4.8) 4872 (4.8)
    Unqualified skull fracture 281 (0.3) 281 (0.3)
    Vertebral column 3093 (3.1) 3093 (3.1)
    Rib, sternum, larynx or trachea 684 (0.7) 684 (0.7)
    Pelvis 544 (0.5) 544 (0.5)
    Clavicle or scapula 9420 (9.3) 9420 (9.3)
    Humerus, radius or ulna 25991 (25.8) 25991 (25.8)
    Carpal, metacarpal, or phalanges 4962 (4.92) 4962 (4.9)
    Other upper limb 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
    Fracture of femur 19281 (19.1) 19281 (19.1)
    Fracture of patella, tibia, or fibula 14702 (14.6) 14702 (14.6)
    Ankle, tarsal, metatarsal bones, phalanges of foot 15583 (15.5) 15583 (15.5)
    Other lower limb 1 (0.0) 1 (0.0)
    Multiple fractures of upper limbs, lower limbs or trunk 59 (0.1) 59 (0.1)
Fracture with surgery 89500 (78.8) 89500 (78.8)
Medical conditions
    Hypertension 33221 (29.2) 33221 (29.2)
    Diabetes 13693 (12.1) 13693 (12.1)
    Hyperlipidemia 13863 (12.2) 13863 (12.2)
    Mental disorders 12459 (11.0) 12459 (11.0)
    Peptic ulcer disease 6226 (5.5) 6226 (5.5)
    Ischemic heart disease 3987 (3.5) 3987 (3.5)
    COPD 3436 (3.0) 3436 (3.0)
    Atherosclerosis 2607 (2.3) 2607 (2.3)
    Anemia 2008 (1.8) 2008 (1.8)
    Heart failure 881 (0.8) 881 (0.8)
    Renal dialysis 237 (0.2) 237 (0.2)
    Liver cirrhosis 179 (0.2) 179 (0.2)
    Chronic kidney disease 440 (0.4) 440 (0.4)
    Asthma 2036 (1.8) 2036 (1.8)
    Stroke 798 (0.7) 798 (0.7)
    Cancer 2049 (1.8) 2049 (1.8)
    Osteoporosis 704 (0.6) 704 (0.6)
    Alcohol-related illness 577 (0.5) 577 (0.5)
    Parkinson's disease 815 (0.7) 815 (0.7)
Number of hospitalizations
    0 104468 (91.9) 104468 (91.9)
    1 7788 (6.9) 7788 (6.9)
    2 931 (0.8) 931 (0.8)
    ≥3 438 (0.4) 438 (0.4)
Number of emergency visits
    0 74908 (65.9) 74908 (65.9)
    1 28007 (24.7) 28007 (24.7)
    2 7536 (6.6) 7536 (6.6)
    ≥3 3174 (2.8) 3174 (2.8)

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

*After matching by propensity score, there is no patients in other ill-defined fractures of trunk, other upper limb, and fracture of unspecified bones.

†Before fracture admission within one year

Compared with women (after matching procedure in Table 3), men had higher risks of post-fracture mortality (OR1.40, 95% CI 1.19–1.64) and complications, including pneumonia (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.62–1.93), acute renal failure (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.33–1.91), deep wound infection (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.47–1.75), stroke (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.49–1.70), septicemia (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.42–1.64) and acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.16–2.12). Longer length of hospital stays (6.6±6.3 vs. 6.2±5.7 days, p < 0.0001) and increased medical expenditures (1743±1797 vs. 1672±1589 US dollars, p < 0.0001) were also noted in the male patients. However, lower risk of urinary tract infection after fracture was found in men compared with women (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60–0.68).

Table 3. Risk of complications and mortality after fracture for female and male patients.

Female (n = 100864) Male (n = 100864) Risk of outcomes
Events % Events % OR (95% CI)*
30-day in-hospital mortality 278 0.3 381 0.4 1.40 (1.19–1.64)
Postoperative complications
    Pneumonia 851 0.8 1456 1.4 1.77 (1.62–1.93)
    Acute renal failure 198 0.2 314 0.3 1.60 (1.33–1.91)
    Deep wound infection 836 0.8 1329 1.3 1.60 (1.47–1.75)
    Stroke 1648 1.6 2514 2.5 1.59 (1.49–1.70)
    Septicemia 1198 1.2 1811 1.8 1.53 (1.42–1.64)
    Acute myocardial infarction 70 0.1 109 0.1 1.57 (1.16–2.12)
    Postoperative bleeding 149 0.2 171 0.2 1.15 (0.92–1.43)
    Pulmonary embolism 65 0.1 74 0.1 1.14 (0.81–1.59)
    Urinary tract infection 2826 2.8 1870 1.9 0.64 (0.60–0.68)
Medical expenditure, US dollars 1672±1589 1743±1797 p<0.0001
Length of hospital stay, days 6.2±5.7 6.6±6.3 p<0.0001

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

*Adjusted for all covariates listed in Table 2.

†Mean±standard deviation. For the medical expenditure, the median and interquartile range were 1328 (954–2073) in men and 1308 (950–2051) in women; For the length of hospital stay, the median and interquartile range were 5 (3–8) in men and 5 (3–7) in women.

In Table 4, the association between male gender and the risk of post-fracture adverse events was significant in patients aged 40–49 years (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07–1.34), 50–59 years (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.13–1.34), 60–69 years (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.25–1.51), 70–79 years (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.29–1.51), and ≥80 years (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.58–1.81). Male gender was associated with increased risk of adverse events after fracture in patients with zero (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17–1.32), one (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.17–1.34), two (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14–1.33), more than three (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10–1.28) documented medical conditions. Post-fracture adverse events were associated with male gender for patients with various subtypes of fracture.

Table 4. The stratified analysis for the risk of adverse events after fracture associated with sex.

Adverse events*
n Events Rate, % OR (95% CI)
Age 20–29 years Female 14965 536 3.6 1.00 (reference)
Male 14965 564 3.8 1.06 (0.93–1.20)
Age 30–39 years Female 12206 454 3.7 1.00 (reference)
Male 12206 461 3.8 1.02 (0.89–1.17)
Age 40–49 years Female 15635 595 3.8 1.00 (reference)
Male 15635 699 4.5 1.20 (1.07–1.34)
Age 50–59 years Female 24800 1113 4.5 1.00 (reference)
Male 24800 1342 5.4 1.23 (1.13–1.34)
Age 60–69 years Female 12237 854 7.0 1.00 (reference)
Male 12237 1124 9.2 1.38 (1.25–1.51)
Age 70–79 years Female 10112 1270 12.6 1.00 (reference)
Male 10112 1668 16.5 1.39 (1.29–1.51)
Age ≥80 years Female 10909 2169 19.9 1.00 (reference)
Male 10909 2471 22.7 1.18 (1.11–1.26)
0 medical condition Female 55426 2250 4.1 1.00 (reference)
Male 55426 2725 4.9 1.24 (1.17–1.32)
1 medical condition Female 21953 1789 8.2 1.00 (reference)
Male 21953 2156 9.8 1.25 (1.17–1.34)
2 medical conditions Female 13121 1467 11.2 1.00 (reference)
Male 13121 1743 13.3 1.24 (1.14–1.33)
≥3 medical conditions Female 10364 1485 14.3 1.00 (reference)
Male 10364 1705 16.5 1.19 (1.10–1.28)
Fracture of skull Female 1391 526 37.8 1.00 (reference)
Male 1391 512 36.8 0.96 (0.82–1.12)
Fracture of face bones Female 4872 99 2.0 1.00 (reference)
Male 4872 146 3.0 1.50 (1.15–1.94)
Other skull fracture Female 281 110 39.2 1.00 (reference)
Male 281 118 42.0 1.14 (0.80–1.62)
Vertebral column Female 3093 311 10.1 1.00 (reference)
Male 3093 426 13.8 1.44 (1.23–1.68)
Rib, sternum, larynx and trachea Female 684 49 7.2 1.00 (reference)
Male 684 72 10.5 1.56 (1.06–2.31)
Pelvis Female 544 65 12.0 1.00 (reference)
Male 544 72 13.2 1.13 (0.78–1.64)
Clavicle or scapula Female 9420 193 2.1 1.00 (reference)
Male 9420 200 2.1 1.04 (0.85–1.27)
Humerus, radius or ulna Female 25991 886 3.4 1.00 (reference)
Male 25991 1072 4.1 1.22 (1.12–1.34)
Carpal, metacarpal, or phalanges Female 4962 152 3.1 1.00 (reference)
Male 4962 137 2.8 0.90 (0.71–1.14)
Fracture of femur Female 19281 3187 16.5 1.00 (reference)
Male 19281 3847 20.0 1.27 (1.20–1.34)
Patella, tibia, or fibula Female 14702 772 5.3 1.00 (reference)
Male 14702 1037 7.1 1.37 (1.25–1.51)
Ankle, tarsal and metatarsal bones, phalanges of foot Female 15583 640 4.1 1.00 (reference)
Male 15583 687 4.4 1.08 (0.97–1.20)
Multiple fractures of upper limbs, lower limbs or trunk Female 59 1 1.7 1.00 (reference)
Male 59 3 5.1 3.49 (0.32–38.4)
Fracture without surgery Female 20920 2512 12.0 1.00 (reference)
Male 20920 2974 14.2 1.24 (1.17–1.32)
Fracture with surgery Female 79944 4479 5.6 1.00 (reference)
Male 79944 5355 6.7 1.23 (1.18–1.28)

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

*Adverse events included with 30-day in-hospital mortality, stroke, pneumonia, septicemia, acute renal failure, acute myocardial infarction, deep wound infection, postoperative bleeding, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection.

†Adjusted for all covariates listed in Table 2.

Discussion

This nationwide, propensity score-matched, retrospective population-based study showed that male gender was independently associated with higher post-fracture 30-day in-hospital mortality, complications (including stroke, acute renal failure, and acute myocardial infarction), and infectious conditions (such as pneumonia, septicemia and deep wound infection). Increased medical expenditures and longer length of hospital stays were also noted in males compared to females.

Several previous investigations have tried to determine the association between sex differences and post-fracture mortality rates. Most studies reported a higher long-term (>120 days) post-fracture mortality rate among men [6,8,9,20,21,22], which is consistent with our study result. Our study showed that male patients have higher 30-day in-hospital mortality rate, compared with female patients. We analyzed 30-day in-hospital mortality, a relatively short-term cut point, instead of a long-term cut point as previous researchers did in order to further reinforce the relationship between fractures and mortality.

Several studies suggested male gender as a risk factor for major infection in post-fracture and trauma populations [23,24], and more male patients suffer from severe sepsis or septic shock in surgical intensive care units [25]. Similar to previous studies, we noted that male patients had higher incidences of post-fracture pneumonia, deep wound infections, and septicemia, while female patients had a higher incidence of urinary tract infections. Mounting evidence in both animal and human studies showed that sex hormones play a role in immunomodulation, which could affect the incidence and severity of infections [2630], suggesting a reasonable explanation as to why female patients may tolerate sepsis better. Splenocyte proliferative capacity and splenocyte interlukin-2 and interlukin-3 responses were remarkably decreased in male septic mice, leading to decreased survival rates [27]. Human studies showed higher levels of a pro-inflammatory mediator (tumor necrosis factor alpha) in men than women, and lower levels of an anti-inflammatory mediator (interlukin-10) in women [29], demonstrating the different immune reactions between genders during sepsis.

In our study, post-fracture infections may account for longer hospital stays, higher medical expenditures, and higher mortality rates. One research has demonstrated that post-hip fracture chest infection may contribute to 30-day mortality, while deep wound infection and urinary tract infection did not [31]. Another study using adjusted logistic regression model analysis concluded that mortality rates were similar between males and females after excluding deaths caused by infections [23]. The fact that men and women have different incidences and severities of infectious diseases should be of greater clinical importance, as it may affect the prognosis significantly.

Post-fracture stroke rate was noted to be higher in men than women. According to previous research, the incidence of stroke is lower in women who are less than 85 years of age, and the first stroke event tends to occur at an older age [32,33]. This may be explained by the neuroprotective effects of estrogen and progesterone [3436]. Estrogen mediates its neuroprotective effect through several mechanisms, including its antioxidant effect, the preservation of autoregulation functions, and decreased cell apoptosis. Progesterone has an effect on membrane stabilization and decreasing cell excitotoxicity through glutamate receptor inhibition [34]. The neuronal preservation tends to be better in women than men after ischemic events [35,36].

The data also showed higher acute myocardial infarction rates in men than women. Estrogen is known to have a cardioprotective effect through various mechanisms [37], thus it is not surprising that previous research has already revealed a gender gap in the risk of myocardial infarction and other cardiovascular diseases [3840]. The incidence of acute renal failure is also higher in men. However, we were unable to obtain information about pre-fracture renal function, medications, and fluid administration via our database, so careful interpretation of this finding is warranted.

Longer hospital stays and increased medical expenditures in male patients were likely due to them experiencing a greater number of adverse events. Other factors that have post-fracture gender differences and might have influenced post-fracture hospital stays and expenses include post-fracture functional status, rehabilitation conditions, and the patients’ socioeconomic support [4144]. Future studies may focus on post-fracture care since this issue may be important to integrated care and cost-savings.

We performed subgroup analyses, which were stratified according to age, number of medical conditions and previous fracture locations. The rate of adverse events shows significant differences among age groups, and the differences tend to be greater as age increases. Additionally, this gender difference is still prominent after accounting for the number of medical conditions and different fracture locations. In addition, we also observed that the gender difference exists in both fracture patients who underwent orthopedic surgery and those who did not. However, this phenomenon was first reported in the present study.

Our study has some limitations. First, our database lacks information about patients’ sociodemographics and lifestyles, as well as their detailed clinical conditions, including pre-fracture and post-fracture physical function, perioperative findings and in-hospital laboratory examinations. Second, we used claimed ICD-9-CM codes, which could not demonstrate the severity of comorbid illnesses, or the mechanism of the injuries. Third, the validation of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database remains inadequate although the physician’s diagnosis and codes of diseases were validated in previous studies [4551]. Fourth, the information of diagnosis-related group and self-payment was not available in the insurance database in Taiwan. It is also a limitation that we could not evaluate the influence of diagnosis-related group and expensive self-payment orthopedic instrument on the medical expense and length of hospital stay. In addition, the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade is a good indicator for determining general health status. However, it is not available in Taiwan’s National Insurance Research Database. Finally, although we performed propensity score matching and multivariate adjustment, some residual confounding bias remains possible. There were many potential confounding factors were not considered in this study.

In conclusion, we raised the possibility that men had more complications and higher mortality than women, with the exception of increased rates of urinary tract infections in women. This phenomenon could be observed in the subgroup analysis. However, the interpretation of our findings should be cautioned because of several study limitation.

Acknowledgments

This study is based in part on data obtained from Taiwan’s Ministry of Health and Welfare. The authors’ interpretations and conclusions do not represent Taiwan’s Ministry of Health and Welfare.

List of abbreviations

ICD-9-CM

International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification

CI

confidence interval

OR

odds ratio

Data Availability

Taiwan’s National Health Insurance program was initiated in March 1995, and it now covers more than 99% of Taiwan’s 23 million residents. In this study, we used reimbursement claims data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database, which records patients’ basic characteristics and medical services. This information includes physicians’ primary and secondary diagnoses, treatment, procedures, prescriptions, the medical expenses of outpatient care, emergency care, and hospitalizations [14-16]. The data underlying this study is from the National Health Insurance Research Database, which has been transferred to the Health and Welfare Data Science Center. Interested researchers can obtain the data through formal application to the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (http://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/np-2497-113.html). Under the regulations from the National Health Insurance Research Institutes, we have made the formal application (included application documents, study proposals, and ethics approval of the institutional review board) of the current insurance data from in 2015. The authors of the present study had no special access privileges in accessing the data which other interested researchers would not have.

Funding Statement

This study was supported in part by grants from Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST106-2314-B-038-036-MY3; MOST105-2629-B-038-001). There was no additional external funding received for this study.

References

  • 1.Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009;302: 1573–1579. 10.1001/jama.2009.1462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lieberman D, Lieberman D. Rehabilitation following hip fracture surgery: a comparative study of females and males. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26: 85–90. 10.1080/196538280310001629660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Aharonoff GB, Meadows SE, Zuckerman JD. Ambulatory ability after hip fracture: a prospective study in geriatric patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;310: 150–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nurmi-Lüthje I, Lüthje P, Kaukonen JP, Kataja M. Positive effects of a sufficient pre-fracture serum vitamin D level on the long-term survival of hip fracture patients in Finland: a minimum 11-year follow-up. Drugs Aging. 2015;32: 477–486. 10.1007/s40266-015-0267-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kannegaard PN, van der Mark S, Eiken P, Abrahamsen B. Excess mortality in men compared with women following a hip fracture. National analysis of comedications, comorbidity and survival. Age Ageing. 2010;39: 203–209. 10.1093/ageing/afp221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Holt G, Smith R, Duncan K, Hutchison JD, Gregori A. Gender differences in epidemiology and outcome after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90: 480–483. 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Forsén L, Sogaard AJ, Meyer HE, Edna T, Kopjar B. Survival after hip fracture: short- and long-term excess mortality according to age and gender. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10: 73–78. 10.1007/s001980050197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Endo Y, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD, Egol KA, Koval KJ. Gender differences in patients with hip fracture: a greater risk of morbidity and mortality in men. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19: 29–35. 10.1097/00005131-200501000-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hommel A, Ulander K, Bjorkelund KB, Norrman PO, Wingstrand H, Thorngren KG. Influence of optimised treatment of people with hip fracture on time to operation, length of hospital stay, reoperations and mortality within 1 year. Injury. 2008;39: 1164–1174. 10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sterling RS. Gender and race/ethnicity differences in hip fracture incidence, morbidity, mortality, and function. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469: 1913–1918. 10.1007/s11999-010-1736-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Penrod JD, Litke A, Hawkes WG, Magaziner J, Doucette JT, Koval KJ, et al. The association of race, gender, and comorbidity with mortality and function after hip fracture. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63: 867–872. 10.1093/gerona/63.8.867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jacobsen SJ, Goldberg J, Miles TP, Brody JA, Stiers W, Rimm AA. Race and sex differences in mortality following fracture of the hip. Am J Public Health. 1992;82: 1147–1150. 10.2105/ajph.82.8.1147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hannan EL, Magaziner J, Wang JJ, Eastwood EA, Silberzweig SB, Gilbert M, et al. Mortality and locomotion 6 months after hospitalization for hip fracture: risk factors and risk-adjusted hospital outcomes. JAMA. 2001;285: 2736–2742. 10.1001/jama.285.21.2736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liao CC, Lin CS, Shih CC, Yeh CC, Chang YC, Lee YW, et al. Increased risk of fracture and postfracture adverse events in patients with diabetes: two nationwide population-based retrospective cohort studies. Diabetes Care. 2014;37: 2246–2252. 10.2337/dc13-2957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tsai CF, Liu CJ, Chen TJ, Chu CJ, Lin HC, Lee FY, et al. Increased incidence of orthopedic fractures in cirrhotic patients: a nationwide population-based study. J Hepatol. 2013;58: 706–714. 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu VC, Chang CH, Wang CY, Lin YH, Kao TW, Lin PC, et al. Risk of fracture in primary aldosteronism: a population-based cohort study. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32: 743–752. 10.1002/jbmr.3033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Austin PC. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat Med. 2014;33: 1057–1069. 10.1002/sim.6004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brinkman W, Herbert MA, O'Brien S, Filardo G, Prince S, Dewey T, et al. Preoperative β-blocker use in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: national database analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174: 1320–1327. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sineshaw HM, Ng K, Flanders WD, Brawley OW, Jemal A. Factors that contribute to differences in survival of black vs white patients with colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2018;154: 906–915. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shortt NL, Robinson CM. Mortality after low-energy fractures in patients aged at least 45 years old. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19: 396–400. 10.1097/01.bot.0000155311.04886.7e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yoshihara H, Yoneoka D. Demographic epidemiology of unstable pelvic fracture in the United States from 2000 to 2009: trends and in-hospital mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76: 380–385. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0cde [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Verbeek DO, Ponsen KJ, Fiocco M, Amodio S, Leenen LPH, Goslings JC. Pelvic fractures in the Netherlands: epidemiology, characteristics and risk factors for in-hospital mortality in the older and younger population. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28: 197–205. 10.1007/s00590-017-2044-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wehren LE, Hawkes WG, Orwig DL, Hebel JR, Zimmerman SI, Magaziner J. Gender differences in mortality after hip fracture: the role of infection. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18: 2231–2237. 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.12.2231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Offner PJ, Moore EE, Biffl WL. Male gender is a risk factor for major infections after surgery. Arch Surg. 1999;134: 935–938. 10.1001/archsurg.134.9.935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wichmann MW, Inthorn D, Andress HJ, Schildberg FW. Incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in surgical intensive care patients: the influence of patient gender on disease process and outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26: 167–172. 10.1007/s001340050041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bone RC. Toward an epidemiology and natural history of SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome). JAMA. 1992;268: 3452–3455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zellweger R, Wichmann MW, Ayala A, Stein S, DeMaso CM, Chaudry IH. Females in proestrus state maintain splenic immune functions and tolerate sepsis better than males. Crit Care Med. 1997;25: 106–110. 10.1097/00003246-199701000-00021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wichmann MW, Zellweger R, DeMaso CM, Ayala A, Chaudry IH. Enhanced immune responses in females, as opposed to decreased responses in males following haemorrhagic shock and resuscitation. Cytokine. 1996;8: 853–863. 10.1006/cyto.1996.0114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schröder J, Kahlke V, Staubach KH, Zabel P, Stüber F. Gender differences in human sepsis. Arch Surg. 1998;133: 1200–1205. 10.1001/archsurg.133.11.1200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Angele MK, Schwacha MG, Ayala A, Chaudry IH. Effect of gender and sex hormones on immune responses following shock. Shock. 2000;14: 81–90. 10.1097/00024382-200014020-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG. Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331: 1374 10.1136/bmj.38643.663843.55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Petrea RE, Beiser AS, Seshadri S, Kelly-Hayes M, Kase CS, Wolf PA. Gender differences in stroke incidence and poststroke disability in the Framingham heart study. Stroke. 2009;40: 1032–1037. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.542894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reid JM, Dai D, Gubitz GJ, Kapral MK, Christian C, Phillips SJ. Gender differences in stroke examined in a 10-year cohort of patients admitted to a Canadian teaching hospital. Stroke. 2008;39: 1090–1095. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.495143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Roof RL, Hall ED. Gender differences in acute CNS trauma and stroke: neuroprotective effects of estrogen and progesterone. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17: 367–388. 10.1089/neu.2000.17.367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alkayed NJ, Harukuni I, Kimes AS, London ED, Traystman RJ, Hurn PD. Gender-linked brain injury in experimental stroke. Stroke. 1998;29: 159–165. 10.1161/01.str.29.1.159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Suzuki Shotaro, Brown Candice M., Wise Phyllis M. Neuroprotective effects of estrogens following ischemic stroke. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009;30: 201–211. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rossouw JE. Hormones, genetic factors, and gender differences in cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53: 550–557. 10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00478-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Leening MJ, Ferket BS, Steyerberg EW, Kavousi M, Deckers JW, Nieboer D, et al. Sex differences in lifetime risk and first manifestation of cardiovascular disease: prospective population based cohort study. BMJ. 2014;349: g5992 10.1136/bmj.g5992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Løchen ML, Thelle DS, Wilsgaard T, Njølstad I, et al. Lifelong gender gap in risk of incident myocardial infarction: The Tromsø Study. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176: 1673–1679. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vitale C, Fini M, Speziale G, Chierchia S. Gender differences in the cardiovascular effects of sex hormones. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2010;24: 675–685. 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2010.00817.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Samuelsson B, Hedström MI, Ponzer S, Söderqvist A, Samnegård E, Thorngren KG, et al. Gender differences and cognitive aspects on functional outcome after hip fracture—a 2 years' follow-up of 2,134 patients. Age Ageing. 2009;38: 686–692. 10.1093/ageing/afp169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hawkes WG, Wehren L, Orwig D, Hebel JR, Magaziner J. Gender differences in functioning after hip fracture. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61: 495–499. 10.1093/gerona/61.5.495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Arinzon Z, Shabat S, Peisakh A, Gepstein R, Berner YN. Gender differences influence the outcome of geriatric rehabilitation following hip fracture. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;50: 86–91. 10.1016/j.archger.2009.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Semel J, Gray JM, Ahn HJ, Nasr H, Chen JJ. Predictors of outcome following hip fracture rehabilitation. PM R. 2010;2: 799–805. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.04.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cheng CL, Lee CH, Chen PS, Li YH, Lin SJ, Yang YH. Validation of acute myocardial infarction cases in the national health insurance research database in taiwan. J Epidemiol. 2014;24: 500–507. 10.2188/jea.JE20140076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cheng CL, Kao YH, Lin SJ, Lee CH, Lai ML. Validation of the National Health Insurance Research Database with ischemic stroke cases in Taiwan. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20: 236–242. 10.1002/pds.2087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hsieh CY, Su CC, Shao, Sung SF, Lin SJ, Kao Yang YH, et al. Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database: past and future. Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11: 349–358. 10.2147/CLEP.S196293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ho TW, Ruan SY, Huang CT, Tsai YJ, Lai F, Yu CJ. Validity of ICD9-CM codes to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from National Health Insurance claim data in Taiwan. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13: 3055–3063. 10.2147/COPD.S174265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cheng CL, Chien HC, Lee CH, Lin SJ, Yang YH. Validity of in-hospital mortality data among patients with acute myocardial infarction or stroke in National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Int J Cardiol. 2015;201: 96–101. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.07.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hsieh CY, Chen CH, Li CY, Lai ML. Validating the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke in a National Health Insurance claims database. J Formos Med Assoc. 2015;114: 254–259. 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cheng CL, Chien HC, Lee CH, Lin SJ, Yang YH. Validity of in-hospital mortality data among patients with acute myocardial infarction or stroke in National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Int J Cardiol. 2015;201: 96–101. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.07.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Taiwan’s National Health Insurance program was initiated in March 1995, and it now covers more than 99% of Taiwan’s 23 million residents. In this study, we used reimbursement claims data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database, which records patients’ basic characteristics and medical services. This information includes physicians’ primary and secondary diagnoses, treatment, procedures, prescriptions, the medical expenses of outpatient care, emergency care, and hospitalizations [14-16]. The data underlying this study is from the National Health Insurance Research Database, which has been transferred to the Health and Welfare Data Science Center. Interested researchers can obtain the data through formal application to the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (http://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/np-2497-113.html). Under the regulations from the National Health Insurance Research Institutes, we have made the formal application (included application documents, study proposals, and ethics approval of the institutional review board) of the current insurance data from in 2015. The authors of the present study had no special access privileges in accessing the data which other interested researchers would not have.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES