Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2020 Mar 26;9(4):909. doi: 10.3390/jcm9040909

Prevalence of Depression in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

María Correa-Rodríguez 1,2, Moath Abu Ejheisheh 1, Nora Suleiman-Martos 3,*, María José Membrive-Jiménez 4, Almudena Velando-Soriano 5, Jacqueline Schmidt-RioValle 1,, José Luis Gómez-Urquiza 1,
PMCID: PMC7230184  PMID: 32225052

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) might adversely affect the health status of the patients, producing cognitive deterioration, with depression being the most common symptom. The aim of this study is to analyse the prevalence of depression in patients before and after coronary artery bypass surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out, involving a study of the past 10 years of the following databases: CINAHL, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SciELO, Scopus, and Web of Science. The total sample comprised n = 16,501 patients. The total number of items was n = 65, with n = 29 included in the meta-analysis. Based on the different measurement tools used, the prevalence of depression pre-CABG ranges from 19–37%, and post-CABG from 15–33%. There is a considerable presence of depression in this type of patient, but this varies according to the measurement tool used and the quality of the study. Systematically detecting depression prior to cardiac surgery could identify patients at potential risk.

Keywords: coronary artery bypass graft, depression, mental health, meta-analysis, prevalence, surgery, systematic review

1. Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the leading causes of death in developed countries, and it is associated with deteriorated quality of life, disability, and premature death [1]. The usual surgical treatment involves coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). This technique is based on revascularisation by diverting blood flow to other arteries to increase the blood supply to the heart muscle [2].

Although CABG surgery increases life expectancy [3], it is associated with multiple physical complications, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and even kidney failure [4]; in addition to psychological consequences, such as mood disorders, fatigue, weakness, stress, anxiety, and depression [5].

Short-term recovery factors include a longer hospital stay, pain, and infection, which may predispose towards cognitive disorders, like anxiety and depression [6]. In the long term, it is estimated that at least 25% of patients will experience deteriorated quality of life after a CABG; and, it even doubles the post-surgery risk of future cardiac events and mortality related to high levels of anxiety and depression [7].

In particular, depression is considered to be one of the main reasons for reduced well-being, having a negative impact on a patient’s quality of life, as well as their social and family life. It is a strong risk factor for mortality, being related to the occurrence of new cardiac events and reduced functionality up to six months post-CABG surgery, increasing the risk of hospital readmission in up to 20% of patients, due to complications including infection, arrhythmia, and volume overload [8].

Diagnosis is sometimes difficult, since symptoms, such as loss of appetite, sleep cycle disturbance, and constant fatigue, may be superimposed over the same symptoms that were derived from surgery. For this reason, determining the degree to which a CABG can affect a patient’s mental, psychological, and social skills, and, specifically, analysing the level of depression, requires the use of multiple tools validated during a clinical interview [9,10].

A number of factors seem to influence the relationship between depression and CABG, including biological alterations (cardiac rhythm alterations, tone of cardiac muscle, hormone levels, and reduced brain perfusion) [11]. However, in many cases, the high prevalence of mood disorders cannot be explained by the severity of the illness, but is instead related to psychosocial factors, such as socioeconomic status, lifestyle (adherence to the recommended diet or prescribed treatment), or the level of social support [12].

Even though the effects of CABG have been studied in terms of morbidity, mortality, and organ function, the effect or influence it has on mood disorders, like depression, remains unclear. It seems that depression predicts how much a patient’s health will deteriorate. Therefore, it is extremely important to assess how the disease affects a patient, as this can influence the therapeutic benefit and, consequently, which interventions and care are prioritised, and which self-care strategies are implemented both before and after surgery [13,14].

Although depression is considered to have a negative impact on patient recovery, few studies have examined the association between CABG and depression. Some systematic reviews have analysed the risk factors [15], and there are also reports regarding the effect of certain interventions [16,17]. However, to our knowledge, no meta-analysis studies that include a prevalence analysis have been exclusively undertaken on CABG patients.

Describing the levels of depression in CABG patients is essential for analysing the importance of this surgery with regard to depression levels. The purpose of this work is, therefore: (1) to analyse the prevalence of depression in patients both before and after CABG surgery; and, (2) to analyse the depression levels over time.

2. Materials and Methods

The data were extracted and analysed based on the recommendations of preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2015 [18].

2.1. Search Strategy

A search was conducted of CINAHL, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, SciELO, Scopus, and Web of Science in January 2020. MeSH descriptors were used, with the search strategy being: “(depression OR depressive disorder) AND (coronary artery bypass grafting)”.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria were the following: (1) full text of quantitative primary studies; (2) men and women aged over 18; (3) no psychiatric pathology or illness; (4) CABG surgery; (5) study of depression levels prior to or after CABG; (6) the use of a validated scale; (7) written in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or French; and, (8) published in the last 10 years.

The exclusion criteria were the following: (1) paediatric population; (2) a different type of cardiac surgery that was not exclusively CABG (CABG with valve replacement); (3) measurement of depression in relatives; (4) patients with an active treatment deriving from a psychiatric disorder; (5) data from duplicate articles in previous studies; and, (6) no depression data extracted using a validated scale.

2.3. Selection of Articles and Information Analysis

Firstly, two authors checked the title and abstract, and, secondly, the full text of the article. A third author was consulted in the case of discrepancy.

For the meta-analysis, we selected the data from those studies that used the same measurement tool, since the inclusion of several measurement tools would not permit the results to be integrated, due to different scores.

2.4. Data Extraction

The following variables were recorded: (1) data on the study (author, year, country); (2) type of CABG (first time, elective or emergency); (3) study characteristics (sample, type of study, sex, and follow-up time); (4) measurement tool; and, (5) mean, standard deviation, prevalence of depression. For clinical trials or quasi-experimental studies, we selected only the levels of depression prior to the programme intervention (baseline) or those relating to the control group.

We used the intraclass correlation coefficient to analyse coding reliability, obtaining an average value of 0.97 (minimum = 0.93; maximum = 1), and the Cohen’s kappa coefficient with a mean value of 0.94 (minimum = 0.92; maximum = 1).

2.5. Assessment of Quality and Measurement of Bias

Two independently authors assessed the quality of the studies, consulting with a third party in the event of a disagreement.

For observational studies (cohort and cross-sectional), we followed the guidelines in “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology” (STROBE) [19]. We followed the standards in the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool for clinical trials [20].

We used a second quality assessment tool to analyse the level of evidence in accordance with the recommendations of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine [21] (Table 1).

Table 1.

Studies reporting prevalence and levels of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) depression.

Study
CABG (First, Elective, Emergency)
Design and Sample Depression
Screening
Instrument
Timing of Assessment M (SD)/Prevalence Main Results EL/RG
Pre Post
Abbott et al., [26]
USA
Elective CABG
RCT
n = 226
83% male
HADS After CABG Cluster 1: 5.9 (4.3)
Cluster 2: 8.2 (4.8)
Cluster 3: 11.8 (6.9)
Elderly patients with more symptoms and chronic illnesses are more prone to depression 1a/A
Aburuz, [27]
Jordan
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 227
78% male
HADS 2-weeks before, 1-month after 12.76 (6.80)
Normal: 57.26%
Mild: 11.90%
Moderate-severe: 30.84%
11.11 (6.78)
Normal: 59.47%
Mild: 13.66%
Moderate-severe: 26.87%
Pre-operative depressive symptoms increased postoperative hospital length of stay 2c/B
Açıkel, [28]
Turkey
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 65
76.9% male
BDI 1-day before
3–7 days, 1-month after
8.12 (5.44)
Normal: 61.5%
Mild: 30.8%
Moderate: 7.7%
Severe: 0%
3rd day: 12.43 (6.36)
Normal: 35.4%
Mild: 40.0%
Moderate: 23.1%
Severe: 1.5%
7th day: 11.66 (6.95)
Normal: 40.0%
Mild: 30.8%
Moderate: 27.7%
Severe: 1.5%
1 month: 12.29 (9.08)
Normal: 47.7%
Mild: 26.2%
Moderate: 23.1%
Severe: 3.1%
Depression levels increase during postoperative CABG period 2c/B
Afridi et al., [29]
Pakistan
First-time CABG
Cohort
n = 134
84.3% male
HAM-D 2 days before, at discharge, 6-months follow-up 98.5%
Mild: 71.6%
Moderate: 23.9%
Severe: 1.5%
Very severe: 1.5%
At discharge: 80.6%
Mild: 73.9%
Moderate: 2.23%
Severe: 2.23%
Very severe: 2.23%
6-months: 16.4%
Depression is commonly reported before and after CABG and influences the quality of life of the patients 2c/B
Ajtahed et al., [30]
Iran
First-time CABG
RCT
n = 75
67% male
DASS After CABG Control group:
Group 1:
Normal: 60%
Mild: 40%
Moderate: 24%
Severe: 12%
Extremely severe: 0%
Group 2:
Normal: 52%
Mild: 8%
Moderate: 32%
Severe: 0%
Extremely severe: 8%
Group 3:
Normal: 45%
Mild: 9.1%
Moderate: 13.6%
Severe: 13.6%
Extremely severe: 18.2%
Training cognitive rehabilitation can improve cognitive functions and quality of life in patients after CABG surgery 1a/A
Ammouri et al., [31]
Jordan
First-time CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 100
80% male
CSS 2-weeks after discharge 3% Pain, leg swelling, poor appetite and trouble sleeping are the most frequent symptoms after CABG 2c/B
Amouzeshi et al., [32]
Iran
Elective CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 54
68% male
BDI 1 day before and after ICU 11.7 (7)
Minimal: 55.4%
Mild: 28.6%
Moderate: 16.1%
Severe: 0%
Male: 31.5 (10.60)
Female: 29.3 (10.55)
Minimal: 0%
Mild: 17.9%
Moderate: 32.1%
Severe: 46.4%
No relationship between age, sex, marital status, and education level with post-operative depression 2c/B
Azzopardi & Lee, [33]
Australia
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 48
85.4% male
BDI Before, 6-weeks after, 1–2 years follow-up 7.31 (4.1) 2 years: 7.90 (7.1) Depression levels 2 years after CABG were not severe 2b/B
Bay et al., [34]
USA
Elective CABG
RCT
n = 170
75% male
HADS Baseline,1–6 months after Control group:
7.3 (3.7)
Control group:
1-month: 3.0 (3.1)
6-months: 3.0 (3.1)
A coping religious intervention can reduce depression levels up to 6 months after surgery 1a/A
Beresnevaite et al., [35]
Lithuania
Elective CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 109
100% male
SCL-90R 1-day before after 63.13 (8.22)
High level: 23%
Preoperative depression score is related with a length stay hospital (p < 0.001) and perioperative complications (p < 0.05) 2b/B
Cebeci & Çelik, [36]
Turkey
First-time CABG
Quasi-experimental
n = 52
80.8% male
HADS 1-day before, 1-day,1-week, 1-month after 8.3 (3.6) At discharge: 7.9 (4.2)
1-week: 8.2 (4.5)
1-month: 7.7 (4.3)
At the time of admission, patients had a higher level of depression than at the time of discharge 1b/A
Chocron et al., [37]
France
First-time CABG
RCT
n = 361
BDI Before CABG 39% Antidepressant treatment did not affect the morbidity and mortality events after CABG surgery 1a/A
Colella et al., [38]
Canada
First-time CABG
RCT
n = 124
100% male
BDI At discharge, 6–12 weeks after Control group:
After: 8.87 (4.74)
6-weeks: 5.84 (5.30)
12-weeks: 4.43 (5.26)
Physiological and psychological challenges after CABG increases the depression risk 1a/A
Dal Boni et al., [39]
Brazil
Elective CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 78
67% male
BDI Before, 2-months after 8.49 (6.87) 5.01 (6.61) CABG had a positive impact on the patient’s quality of life 2b/B
Doering et al., [40]
USA
First-time CABG
Cohort
n = 67
100% female
HAM-D At discharge, 1 month after 41.79% Six months after CABG, women with major depression have at increased risk for infections 2b/B
Donohue et al., [41]
USA
Elective CABG
RCT
n = 2485
PHQ-2 At discharge 56% A nurse-guided intervention in the mental health area reduces the level of depression and health costs post-CABG 1a/A
Dunkel et al., [42]
Germany
Elective CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 1238
72% male
PHQ-9 Before CABG 21.6% Lower age, female gender, less than 10 years of education and living alone are related to depression symptoms 2b/B
Dunkel et al., [43]
Germany
Elective CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 971
80.1% male
PHQ-9 1–3 days
before, 1 year after
5.61 (4.31) Female gender is related to depression symptoms Attributions to stress, personality and destiny are associated with higher depression scores 2b/B
El-Baz et al., [44]
Netherlands and Slovakia
Elective CABG
Observational multicentre
n total = 226
n1 = 114 Slovakia
n2 = 112 Netherlands 80% male
HADS Before CABG n1 = 5.01 (3.73)
n2 = 4.96 (3.16)
Female gender, smoking, lower education, and lower social support are risks factors of depression 2b/B
Elliott et al., [45]
Australia
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 174
80% male
POMS-D Before, 2–6 months after 10.50 (11.76) 2-months: 7.38 (9.41)
6-months: 8.32 (10.52)
The young, male and smoking are the main risk factors of depression 2b/B
Feuchtinger et al., [46]
Germany
First-time CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 24
37.5% male
HADS 1-day before 6.7 (5.1)
Low: 54.17%
Moderate: 20.83%
Severe: 25%
Interventions such as information, spiritual support or cognitive behavioral therapy are the key to reduce the feeling of fear before CABG surgery 2b/B
Freedland et al., [47]
USA
Elective CABG
RCT
n = 123
50% male
BDI
HAM-D
1 year after BDI = 22.26 (1.3)
HAM-D = 19.53 (1)
Improvement in perceived cognitive impairment correlated with improvement in depression 1a/A
Gallagher & McKinley, [48]
Australia
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 155
74% male
HADS Before, after surgery, 2-weeks after 4.10 (3.22)
16%
After: 18.2%
4.67 (3.49)
2-weeks: 45%
6.58 (4.03)
26.5% of patients reported low perceptions of control before CABG, 22% after surgery and 10.3% at discharge 2b/B
Gelogahi et al., [49]
Iran
Elective CABG
RCT
n = 40
37.5% male
DASS Before, after 6.67 (4.7) 12.1 (8.1) Nurses interventions can reduce depression levels after surgery 1a/A
Hazavei et al., [50]
Iran
First-time CABG
Quasi-experimental
n = 27
77.8% male
CDS Before, 4-8 weeks after 104.5 (30.4) 2-months after: 89.2 (27.8) Most patients lacked the skills in health education and lifestyle-related with coronary artery disease 1b/A
Horne et al., [51]
Canada
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 104
PHQ-9 Before 60.6% Length of stay (more than 7 days) is associated with a higher risk of depression 2b/B
Hweidi et al., [52]
Jordan
Elective CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 143
53.1% male
SDS 2 days after Mild: 32.2%
Moderate: 60.1%
Severe: 5.6%
Depression is related to female, unmarried and unemployed patients 2b/B
Kendel et al., [53]
Germany
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 351
77% male
PHQ-9 2 months, 2 years after Male: 5.38 (4.2)
Female: 6.84 (4.8)
Females have a higher level of depressive symptoms 2b/B
Kendel et al., [54]
Germany
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 883
80.2% male
PHQ-9 1–3 days before 5.38 (4.09)
8.5%
Depression is related to a deterioration of physical condition in patients undergoing CABG surgery 2b/B
Khoueiry et al., [55]
USA
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 50
56% male
BDI Before, 1–3–6–9 months follow-up 8% After: 60%
3-months: 44%
6-months: 40%
9-months: 44%
Age and gender are not correlated with depression levels 2b/B
King et al., [56]
Canada
First-time CABG
Cohort
n = 120
100% male
BDI
CDS
At discharge, 6–12–36 weeks follow-up BDI
At discharge:
8.08 (4.76) 4.3%
6-weeks:
5.82 (5.36) 1.9%
12-weeks:
4.81 (4.73) 1.9%
36-weeks:
4.31 (5.81) 2.1%
CDS
At discharge:
74.46 (24.29) 17.2%
6-weeks:
59.58 (25.19) 7.6%
12-weeks:
54.56 (23.06) 6.7%
36 weeks:
51.22 (23.17) 4.3%
Family reduces the risk of depression 2b/B
Korbmacher et al., [57]
Germany
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 135
77% male
HADS 1–2 days before,1-week, 6-months after 4.3 (3.1)
20.7%
1-week:
5 (3.9) 24%
6-months: 4.7 (4.3) 28%
Hight levels of depression are not associated with mortality. A 24.2% of patients with normal scores before surgery suffers depression 6-months latter 2b/B
Kozora et al., [58]
USA
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 1156
99.2% male
BDI After, 1-year follow-up 9.9 (7.65) 8.9 (7.85) Older age and lower education are related to depression levels 2b/B
Macken et al., [59]
USA
Elective CABG
Quasi-experimental
n = 34
76.5% male
PHQ-9 After CABG Control group: 18% An intervention cardiac program can reduce depressive symptoms 1b/A
McGrady et al., [60]
USA
Elective CABG
Quasi-experimental
n = 91
BDI After CABG 9.2 (7.5) The symptoms can affect adherence to prescribed treatment and may also affect morbidity and mortality 1b/A
McKenzie et al., [61]
UK
Elective or emergency CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 111
82.9% male
HADS After CABG 3.16 (3.61)13.5% Post-operative depression predicts activities of daily living functioning 2b/B
McKhann et al., [24]
USA
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 220
73.6% male
CES-D After, 3 months, 1–3–6 years after Baseline: 13.2 (9.8) 32.4%
3-months: 10.2 (9.9) 24.1%
1 year: 9.1 (9.8) 17.3%
3 year: 8.9 (9.5) 11.8%
6 year: 10.1 (9.4) 16.8%
Depressed patients tended to have more memory complaints 2b/B
Modica et al., [62]
Italy
Elective CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 1179
80% male
HADS After CABG Moderate-severe: 10.4%
Male: 9.2%
Female: 15.4%
Female gender is related to a higher depression score 2b/B
Moser et al., [63]
USA
Elective CABG
Observational multicentre
n = 131
94% male
MAACL After CABG 13.0 (5.5)
53%
Factors such as being a woman and have lower educational attainment are related to depression 2b/B
Murphy et al., [64]
Australia
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 184
79% male
HADS Before, 2–6 months follow-up 5.35 (4.01) 2-months: 4.16 (3.71)
6-months: 3.87 (3.51)
Over 6-months follow-up patients show a minor score of depression 2b/B
Nair et al., [65]
India
Elective CABG
Quasi-experimental
n = 500
20.2% male
HADS 6 months after 20.2% 11.6% of patients after CABG adhered to healthy lifestyle practices 1b/A
Nemati & Astaneh, [66]
Iran
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 71
73% male
HADS Before, 4-weeks after Male: 13.58 (8.54)
Female: 17.88 (7.54)
Male: 9.51 (6.00)
Female: 15.05 (8.63)
CABG surgery can decrease the level of depression in a short-term follow-up 2b/B
Nunes et al., [67]
Brazil
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 57
68.42% male
BDI Before, 6-months after Minimal: 56.14%
Mild: 26.32%
Moderate: 12.28%
Severe: 5.26%
Minimal: 49.12%
Mild: 29.82%
Moderate: 17.54%
Severe: 3.51%
Improvement the quality of life with CABG surgery reducing depressive symptoms 2b/B
Okamoto et al., [68]
Japan
Elective or emergency CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 79
75.9% male
HADS 1–5 years after Mild: 10.1%
Moderate-severe: 10.1%
Depression in CABG patients is related to a decrease in functional status or activities of daily living 2b/B
Oldham et al., [69]
USA
First-time CABG
Cohort
n = 131
73% male
HAM-D
PHQ-9
GDS
Before HAM-D: 9.9%
16.3 (5.4)
PHQ-9: 56.2%
13.4 (3.9)
GDS: 6.9 (3.6)
Preoperative depression predicts post-CABG cognitive health 2b/B
Perrotti et al., [70]
France
Elective CABG
RCT
n = 359
85% male
BDI Before,1 year after 39.6% In the first year after CABG, depressed patients have a lower improvement and quality of life 1a/A
Perrotti et al., [71]
France
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 272
78% male
HADS 2-weeks before 6% CABG surgery improve the functional mobility, quality of life and maintenance of an independent status 2b/B
Phillips-Bute et al., [72]
USA
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 427
70% male
CES-D Before, 6 months, 1 year after Mild-Severe
Male: 28%
Female: 57%
Mild-severe:
Male:
6-months: 17%
1-year: 17%
Female:
6-months: 33%
1-year: 32%
Depressed patients are more prone than nondepressed patients to have a new cardiac event within 2 years of CABG 2b/B
Poole et al., [23]
UK
First-time CABG
Cohort
n = 310
86% male
BDI 29 days before, after surgery 8.68 (6.61)
30.3%
Minimal: 69.7%
Mild: 25.5%
Moderate-severe: 4.8%
8.33 Pre-operative depression is associated with longer postoperative hospital stays. The young, female gender, overweight, smoking and hypertension variables are related to depression symptoms 2b/B
Pourafkari et al., [73]
Iran
Elective CABG
Quasi-experimental
n = 40
82% male
BDI After CABG 25%
Minimal: 75%
Mild: 12%
Moderate: 8%
Severe: 5%
The emergence of new-onset depression after CABG is associated with a poor outcome 1b/A
Rezaei et al., [74]
Iran
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 135
75% male
SCL-90R 6 months after 1.17 (0.75)
44.22%
The prevalent mental disorder after CABG is depression followed by sensitivity, paranoia, hostility, anxiety, obsession, somatization, phobia, and psychosis 2b/B
Sandau et al., [75]
USA
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 54
78% male
CES-D Before, 3-months after 14.2 (8.6)
20%
10.4 (7.5) Depressive symptoms remain constant from pre- to postoperatively at 3 months 2b/B
Schwarz et al., [76]
Germany
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 47
89% male
HADS Before, 3-months after 5.0 (3.4) 3.8 (3.1) Depression and health-related quality of life are not associated with cognitive dysfunction after CABG 2b/B
Selnes et al., [25]
USA
Elective or emergency CABG
Cohort
n = 152
76% male
CES-D Before, 12–72 months follow-up 13.2 (9.6)
33%
9.5 (9.2)
13%
CABG patients had a decline of score 72-months after 2b/B
Sorensen & Wang, [77]
USA
First-time CABG
Cohort
n = 70
66% male
GDS Before, 6-weeks after 3.1 (2.5)
24.2%
2.4 (2.3)
15.9%
Women had greater depression pre-operative and post-operative. Length of stay and age are not related to depression 2b/B
Spezzaferri et al., [78]
Italy
Elective CABG
Cohort
n = 118
100% male
CBA 2.0-D At discharge,
1 year after
At discharge: 12.7%
1 year: 5.9%
1 year after CABG depression level decreased 2b/B
Stenman & Sartipy, [79]
Sweden
Elective and emergency CABG
Cohort
n = 302
PHQ-9 Before 29% Depressive symptoms are twice as frequent in women as in men 2b/B
Thomas et al., [80]
India
First-time CABG
Quasi-experimental
n = 100
85% male
HADS Before, 1-week, 1 month after 4.10 (3.30) 1-week: 2.03 (2.60)
1-month: 1.26 (1.82)
Medical adherence behavior is related to depression six weeks after surgery 1b/A
Tsai et al., [81]
Taiwan
First-time CABG
Cohort
n = 198
81% male
CSS Before, 1–6 weeks, 3 months follow-up 2.42 (2.64) 1-week: 1.41 (2.00)
6-weeks: 1.24 (1.86)
3-months: 0.96 (1.70)
Age, a longer stay in ICU, smoking, and lack of exercise are related to worse symptoms. 88% of patients have a trajectory of depression levels that decrease over time 2b/B
Tully et al., [82]
Australia
First-time CABG
Cohort
n = 226
83% male
DASS Before, 4 days after 20.1% 23.5% Readmission is related to a higher depression score. Depression symptoms are associated with morbidity 2b/B
Tully et al., [83]
Australia
First-time CABG
Cohort
n = 226
83% male
BDI Before, after surgery 8.62 (6.23) 9.05 (6.40) Pessimism, past failure, self-criticalness and, worthlessness are associated with cardiac morbidity and mortality 2b/B
Yang et al., [84]
China
First-time CABG
Cohort
n = 232
81% male
PHQ-9 3-days before, 6-months after 4.8 (5.0)
18.1%
4.2 (5.0)
18.1%
Preoperative depression is associated with women gender 2b/B
Yang et al., [85] Taiwan
Elective and emergency CABG
Cross-sectional
n = 87
74.7% male
HADS 1 week, 1 month after 1 week:
Mild: 17.2%
Moderate-severe: 60.9%
1 month: 8.75 (4.63)
Mild: 24.1%
Moderate-severe: 35.6%
Depression is related to sleep quality after CABG surgery 2b/B
Yüksel et al., [86]
Turkey
Elective and first-CABG
Cohort
n = 63
G1: diagnosed after
experiencing an ACS
G2: diagnosed without
an ACS
BDI Before G1:14.9 (9.5)
G2: 12.1 (7.4)
66.6%
Mild: 22.2%
Moderate-severe: 44.4%
Patients in both groups were found to be depressed and hopeless about the future 2b/B
Zimmerman et al., [87]
USA
Elective CABG
RCT
n = 226
83% male
CSS At discharge 19% Health care providers must assist the patients before hospital discharge to identify the risks and difficulties in patients after CABG up to 6 months after surgery 1a/A

ACS = Acute Coronary Syndrome; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; CABG = Coronary Artery Bypass Graft; CBA 2.0-D = Depression scales of the Cognitive Behavioural Assessment; CDS = Cardiac Depression Scale; CES-D = Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; CSS = Cardiac Symptom Survey; DASS = Depression, Anxiety, Stress scale; GDS = Geriatric Depression Scale; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HAM-D = Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; ICU = Intensive care unit; MAACL = Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist; PHQ-2 = Patient Health Questionnaire 2-item; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item; POMS-D = Profile of Mood State Depression Scale; RCT = Randomized Clinical Trial; SDS = Self-rating Depression Scale; SCL-90R = Symptom Checklist-90 Revised.

2.6. Data Synthesis and Statistical Analysis

The meta-analysis included those studies that used the same tool for measuring depression. We performed six meta-analyses using a random-effects model and two meta-analyses using a fixed-effect model, for prevalence levels and confidence intervals, through the statistical package StatsDirect (version 3, StatsDirect Ltd., Cambridge, UK).

We used I2 to analyse the heterogeneity, grouping values into low (25%), moderate (50%), or high (75%) heterogeneity [22]. The publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test.

3. Results

The search yielded a total of n = 1874 articles. After reading the title and abstract, 662 were excluded. Figure 1 shows the study selection process.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow-chart of included studies.

3.1. Characteristics of Included Studies

The total sample comprised 16,501 patients, predominantly male (n = 54). Most of the studies were cohort studies (n = 34), followed by cross-sectional studies (n = 12). Thirteen studies evaluated the levels prior to surgery, 23 after surgery, and 29 both before and after. Most of the studies were carried out in the USA (n = 17), followed by Germany (n = 7), Iran (n = 7), and Australia (n = 6) (Table 1). The depression follow-up ranged from a month prior to surgery (since the pre-assessment clinic appointment) [23] up to six years after surgery [24,25].

3.2. Measurement of Depression

We used a total of 15 measurement tools. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (n = 18), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (n = 17), nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (n = 9), and Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (n = 4) were the measurement tools used (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1).

3.3. Meta-Analysis

A total of 1217 patients were included in the meta-analysis prior to CABG surgery, and 596 patients after the operation. Egger’s test showed no publication bias in any case.

For the HADS tool, the prevalence of depression prior to surgery (n = 144) was 19% (95% CI = 9–31) with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 93.4%), while the prevalence after surgery (n = 394) was 19% (95% CI = 13–26) with I2 = 92.2%, according to the random effects model (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Forest plot for pre-CABG depression using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Forest plot for post-CABG depression using HADS.

For the BDI tool, the prevalence of depression prior to surgery (n = 469) was 37% (95% CI = 28–46) with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 89.4%), while the prevalence afterwards (n = 97) was 33% (95% CI = 12–59) with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 96.6%), according to the random effects model (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Forest plot for pre-CABG depression using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Forest plot for post-CABG depression using BDI.

According to the PHQ-9 tool, the prevalence prior to surgery (n = 543) was 22% (95% CI = 12–33) with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 97.5%) according to the random effects model; and, the prevalence of depression after surgery (n = 48), using the fixed effects model, was 18% (95% CI = 14–23) (Figure 6 and Figure 7), with a low degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 2%).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Forest plot for pre-CABG depression using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Forest plot for post-CABG depression using PHQ-9.

Finally, for CES-D, the prevalence of pre-CABG depression (n = 61) using the random effects model was 28% (95% CI = 17–40) with a moderate degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 66.9%); while the prevalence after surgery (n = 57) was 15% (95% CI = 12–19) with a low degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 2%), according to the fixed effects model (Figure 8 and Figure 9)

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Forest plot for pre-CABG depression using Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Forest plot for post-CABG depression using CES-D.

3.4. Levels of Depression Before and After CABG Surgery and Follow Up

Prior to CABG surgery, most of the authors report depression levels within the normal range, although others found mild [36,55,58,83,86] and moderate levels [27,35,66,69] (Table 1).

Post-surgery, most authors report normal levels, while others found mild [28,36,49,53,58,60,66,83,85,88], moderate [27,47,69], and severe [32] levels.

The majority of authors observed a positive impact on depression prevalence and levels after surgery, as well as in the short and medium term, although others found that these levels increased after surgery [28,32,33,48,49,55,57,89].

4. Discussion

The prevalence of depression obtained in this study varied between 19% and 37% prior to surgery, and between 15% and 33% after surgery, depending on the type of measurement tool used. Other studies that combine CABG with valve replacement have reported similar percentages, with depression prevalence ranging from 15% pre-CABG [90] to 37.7% post-CABG [51,91], associated with the development of the disease, worse quality of life, longer hospital stays, and high rates of hospital readmissions [8].

Normal levels of pre-CABG depression are observed, although other studies have indicated higher levels, from moderate to severe [92]. However, more than 25% of patients with normal levels are at risk of worsening, for which reason continuous reassessment can identify patients with transient symptoms of depression [93].

High levels of depression prior to the operation predict a worse quality of life [94,95], worse survival after a CABG [12,96], and more symptoms up to six months after surgery [97].

We have observed that depression levels did not go to remission, but they tend to improve in depressive symptoms, which is probably due to an improvement in the patient’s quality of life [98], and even due to greater optimism that facilitates commitment to adaptation [99]. Some authors have found a positive impact on patients from eight weeks [100], while others report a slight improvement from the first month post-CABG surgery [101]. For the majority of patients, depression persists after the surgery. Recent meta-analyses demonstrated that patients undergoing heart valve surgery are at risk of cognitive dysfunction up to six months after surgery [102,103].

Although there is a relationship between depression and CABG, its temporal onset is not clear. Depression can be a pre-existing condition, which increases the risk of cardiovascular disease that is related to behavioural alterations in diet, physical activity level, toxic habits, or poor adherence to treatment and recommendations [45]; or, can appear as a consequence of multiple postoperative complications, such as longer hospital stays [23], readmissions [104,105], general pain [104], or even when facing a series of lifestyle changes [12].

Without evaluation, it is unlikely that depression is being treated correctly. Some authors report that more than 50% of patients were receiving medical treatment for depression, even though they had no symptoms of depression [106]. For this reason, the use of measurement tools to confirm the presence and levels of depression makes it possible to identify the at-risk patients, and therefore carry out a more in-depth post-CABG follow-up, of at least nine months [93].

The current study highlights the importance of depression measures before and after CABG in assessing clinically meaningful mood disturbance, in order to provide early intervention. Systematic screening for depression in the period both before and after this procedure is crucial. Planned coaching combined with counselling can reduce these levels [36]. Cardiac rehabilitation programmes [107,108] and cognitive-behavioural therapies are also available, which reduce the levels of depression and even decrease the length of hospital stays [109]. However, further studies are needed to understand the potential prognostic implication of depression and investigate the best ways to approach the treatment of depression in this patient group.

Depression counselling prior to surgery can influence the post-surgical depression levels by positively improving a patient’s perception of illness control and management [13]. Planning is therefore an essential part of the healthcare process as it has the potential to promote self-care [36].

From a clinical perspective, these results suggest that strategies that are aimed to improve depression as a disorder, such as the application of policies and depression assessment protocols prior to CABG by health care providers, are essential, because the depression level might help risk stratification in patients undergoing CABG identifying the high-risk groups and the trajectory of recovery experienced [11].

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the heterogeneity in terms of prevalence is due to different estimation methods over time, differences in the timing of assessment and demographic differences between samples, different uses of cut-offs on questionnaire measures, as well as the use of various tools for assessing the symptoms of depression. Secondly, the measuring tools assess the severity of depression symptoms, but they do not replace a formal clinical diagnosis of depression.

5. Conclusions

There is a high presence of depression both before and after CABG surgery. While this study found an overall improvement in depressive symptoms after CABG, depression persists after the surgery for the majority of patients. The depression levels present prior to the operation may affect postoperative recovery.

Given the prevalence of depression and its impact, early detection is crucial, since it enables the identification of at-risk patients, through a clinical interview that uses validated measurement tools. This enables the medical team to implement preventive strategies as well as monitor the development of the depression.

Acknowledgments

The results reported in the study are from the doctoral thesis of Moath Abu Ejheisheh and belong to the Clinical Medicine and Health Public Programme (B 12.56.1) of the University of Granada, Spain.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/4/909/s1, Table S1: Depression Assessment Instruments Used by the 65 Studies Included in the Systematic Review [110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122].

Author Contributions

J.S.-R., J.L.G.-U. and M.C.-R. conceived and designed the review and meta-analysis; M.A.E., N.S.-M. and M.J.M.-J. contributed to the selection process and analysis of the risk of bias; N.S.-M. and J.L.G.-U. contributed to the meta-analysis; J.S.-R., M.C.-R. and A.V.-S. contributed to the data extraction; N.S.-M. and M.C.-R. wrote the paper; J.S.-R. and J.L.G.-U. drafted the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Le J., Dorstyn D.S., Mpfou E., Prior E., Tully P.J. Health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis mapped against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Qual. Life Res. 2018;27:2491–2503. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1885-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alexander J.H., Smith P.K. Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:1954–1964. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1406944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Noyez L., de Jager M.J., Markou A.L.P. Quality of life after cardiac surgery: Underresearched research. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2011;13:511–515. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2011.276311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karim M.N., Reid C.M., Huq M., Brilleman S.L., Cochrane A., Tran L., Billah B. Predicting long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2018;26:257–263. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.AbuRuz M.E., Al-Dweik G., Al-Akash H.Y. Checking the moderating effect of perceived control on the relationship between anxiety and postoperative hospital length of stay among coronary artery bypass graft patients. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2019;12:79–85. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S192333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kidd T., Poole L., Ronaldson A., Leigh E., Jahangiri M., Steptoe A. Attachment anxiety predicts depression and anxiety symptoms following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2016;21:796–811. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Celano C.M., Huffman J.C. Depression and cardiac disease: A review. Cardiol. Rev. 2011;19:130–142. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e31820e8106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Iribarne A., Chang H., Alexander J.H., Gillinov A.M., Moquete E., Puskas J.D., Bagiella E., Acker M.A., Mayer M.L., Ferguson T.B., et al. Readmissions after cardiac surgery: Experience of the national institutes of health/canadian institutes of health research cardiothoracic surgical trials network. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2014;98:1274–1280. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Beck A., Steer R. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. 1993 ed. Psychological Corporation; San Antonio, TX, USA: 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zigmond A.S., Snaith R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1983;67:361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ravven S., Bader C., Azar A., Rudolph J.L. Depressive symptoms after CABG surgery: A meta-analysis. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry. 2013;21:59–69. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0b013e31828a3612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stenman M., Holzmann M.J., Sartipy U. Association between preoperative depression and long-term survival following coronary artery bypass surgery—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016;222:462–466. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rushton M., Howarth M., Grant M.J., Astin F. Person-centred discharge education following coronary artery bypass graft: A critical review. J. Clin. Nurs. 2017;26:5206–5215. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abdulrahman M., Alsabbagh A., Kuntze T., Lauer B., Ohlow M.A. Impact of hierarchy on multidisciplinary heart-team recommendations in patients with isolated multivessel coronary artery disease. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:1490. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McKenzie L., Simpson J., Stewart M. A systematic review of pre-operative predictors of post-operative depression and anxiety in individuals who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Psychol. Health Med. 2010;15:74–93. doi: 10.1080/13548500903483486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Protogerou C., Fleeman N., Dwan K., Richardson M., Dundar Y., Hagger M.S. Moderators of the effect of psychological interventions on depression and anxiety in cardiac surgery patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav. Res. Ther. 2015;73:151–164. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Keeping-Burke L., Purden M., Frasure-Smith N., Cossette S., McCarthy F., Amsel R. Bridging the transition from hospital to home: Effects of the VITAL telehealth program on recovery for CABG surgery patients and their caregivers. Res. Nurs. Health. 2013;36:540–553. doi: 10.1002/nur.21571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moher D., Shamseer L., Clarke M., Ghersi D., Liberati A., Petticrew M., Shekelle P., Stewart L. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sanderson S., Tatt I.D., Higgins J.P.T. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: A systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2007;36:666–676. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Higgins J.P.T., Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. [(accessed on 10 September 2019)]; Available online: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 21.Howick J., Chalmers I., Glasziou P., Greenhalg T., Heneghan C., Liberati A., Moschetti I., Phillips B., Thornton H. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. [(accessed on 10 September 2019)]; Available online: https://www.cebm.net/2016/05/ocebm-levels-of-evidence.
  • 22.Higgins J.P.T., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., Altman D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br. Med. J. 2003;327:557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Poole L., Leigh E., Kidd T., Ronaldson A., Jahangiri M., Steptoe A. The combined association of depression and socioeconomic status with length of post-operative hospital stay following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Data from a prospective cohort study. J. Psychosom. Res. 2014;76:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McKhann G.M., Selnes O.A., Grega M.A., Bailey M.M., Pham L.D., Baumgartner W.A., Zeger S.L. Subjective memory symptoms in surgical and nonsurgical coronary artery patients: 6-year follow-up. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009;87:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.09.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Selnes O.A., Grega M.A., Bailey M.M., Pham L.D., Zeger S.L., Baumgartner W.A., McKhann G.M. Cognition 6 years after surgical or medical therapy for coronary artery disease. Ann. Neurol. 2008;63:581–590. doi: 10.1002/ana.21382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Abbott A., Barnason S., Zimmerman L. Symptom burden clusters and their impact on psychosocial functioning following coronary artery bypass surgery. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2010;25:301–310. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181cfbb46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aburuz M.E. Pre-operative depression predicted longer hospital length of stay among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy. 2019;12:75–83. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S190511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Açıkel M.E.T. Evaluation of depression and anxiety in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: A prospective clinical study. Braz. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019;34:389–395. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Afridi M.I., Habib S., Lal C., Khan A.U.R., Afaq S.M., Tariq Q.D. Frequency of depression in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABGS), before the surgery, at discharge and at six months follow up. J. Liaquat Univ. Med. Heal. Sci. 2016;15:110–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ajtahed S.S., Rezapour T., Etemadi S., Moradi H., Habibi Asgarabad M., Ekhtiari H. Efficacy of neurocognitive rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in improving quality of life: An interventional trial. Front. Psychol. 2019;10:1759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ammouri A.A., Al-Daakak Z.M., Gharaibeh H., Al-Zaru I. Symptoms experienced by jordanian men and women after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Dimens. Crit. Care Nurs. 2016;35:125–132. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Amouzeshi A., Hosseini S.M., Javadi A., Norozian F., Zamanian N., Yahya M., Jomefourjan S., Amouzeshi Z., Kohan M. Depression and associated factors in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in Imam Reza Hospital of Mashhad in 2013. J. Surg. Trauma. 2015;3:51–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Azzopardi S., Lee G. Health-related quality of life 2 years after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2009;24:232–240. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31819b2125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bay P.S., Beckman D., Trippi J., Gunderman R., Terry C. The effect of pastoral care services on anxiety, depression, hope, religious coping, and religious problem solving styles: A randomized controlled study. J. Relig. Health. 2008;47:57–69. doi: 10.1007/s10943-007-9131-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Beresnevaite M., Benetis R., Taylor G.J., Jurnien K., Kinduris Š., Barauskien V. Depression predicts perioperative outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 2010;44:289–294. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2010.490593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cebeci F., Çelik S.Ş. Effects of discharge teaching and counselling on anxiety and depression level of CABG patients. Turk. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2011;19:170–176. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2011.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chocron S., Vandel P., Durst C., Laluc F., Kaili D., Chocron M., Etievent J.-P. Antidepressant therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: The MOTIV-CABG trial. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2013;95:1609–1618. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Colella T.J., King-Shier K. The effect of a peer support intervention on early recovery outcomes in men recovering from coronary bypass surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2018;17:408–417. doi: 10.1177/1474515117725521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dal Boni A.L.M., Martinez J.E., Da Silva Saccomann I.C.R. Quality of Life of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Acta Paul. Enferm. 2013;26:575–580. doi: 10.1590/S0103-21002013000600011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Doering L.V., Martínez-Maza O., Vredevoe D.L., Cowan M.J. Relation of depression, natural killer cell function, and infections after coronary artery bypass in women. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2008;7:52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Donohue J.M., Belnap B.H., Men A., He F., Roberts M.S., Schulberg H.C., Reynolds C.F., Rollman B.L. Twelve-month cost-effectiveness of telephone-delivered collaborative care for treating depression following CABG surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 2014;36:453–459. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dunkel A., Kendel F., Lehmkuhl E., Babitsch B., Oertelt-Prigione S., Hetzer R., Regitz-Zagrosek V. Predictors of preoperative depressive risk in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2009;98:643–650. doi: 10.1007/s00392-009-0050-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dunkel A., Kendel F., Lehmkuhl E., Hetzer R., Regitz-Zagrosek V. Causal attributions among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: Gender aspects and relation to depressive symptomatology. J. Behav. Med. 2011;34:351–359. doi: 10.1007/s10865-011-9324-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.El-Baz N., Ondusova D., Studencan M., Rosenberger J., Reijneveld S.A., van Dijk J.P., Middel B. Differences between Slovak and Dutch patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery regarding clinical and psychosocial predictors of physical and mental health-related quality of life. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2018;17:324–335. doi: 10.1177/1474515117747571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Elliott P.C., Murphy B.M., Oster K.A., Le Grande M.R., Higgins R.O., Worcester M.U.C. Changes in mood states after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2010;9:188–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Feuchtinger J., Burbaum C., Heilmann C., Imbery C., Siepe M., Stotz U., Fritzsche K., Beyersdorf F. Anxiety and fear in patients with short waiting times before coronary artery bypass surgery—A qualitative study. J. Clin. Nurs. 2014;23:1900–1907. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Freedland K., Skala J., Carney R., Rubin E., Lustman P., Dávila-Román V., Steinmeyer B., Hogue C. Treatment of depression after coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2009;66:387–396. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gallagher R., McKinley S. Anxiety, depression and perceived control in patients having coronary artery bypass grafts. J. Adv. Nurs. 2009;65:2386–2396. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gelogahi Z.K., Aghebati N., Mazloum S.R., Mohajer S. Effectiveness of nurse’s intentional presence as a holistic modality on depression, anxiety, and stress of cardiac surgery patients. Holist. Nurs. Pract. 2018;32:296–306. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0000000000000294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hazavei S.M.M., Sabzmakan L., Hasanzadeh A., Rabiei K., Roohafza H. The effects of an educational program based on PRECEDE model on depression levels in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting. ARYA Atheroscler. 2012;8:36–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Horne D., Kehler S., Kaoukis G., Hiebert B., Garcia E., Duhamel T.A., Arora R.C. Depression before and after cardiac surgery: Do all patients respond the same? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013;145:1400–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hweidi I.M., Gharaibeh B.A., Al-Obeisat S.M., Al-Smadi A.M. Prevalence of depression and its associated factors in patients post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J. Res. Nurs. 2018;23:76–88. doi: 10.1177/1744987117728314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kendel F., Dunkel A., Lehmkuhl E., Hetzer R., Regitz-Zagrosek V. Does time spent on household activities or housework stress complicate recovery following coronary artery bypass surgery? Women Health. 2008;48:325–338. doi: 10.1080/03630240802463525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kendel F., Gelbrich G., Wirtz M., Lehmkuhl E., Knoll N., Hetzer R., Regitz-Zagrosek V. Predictive relationship between depression and physical functioning after coronary surgery. Arch. Intern. Med. 2010;170:1717–1721. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Khoueiry G., Flory M., Abi Rafeh N., Zgheib M.H., Goldman M., Abdallah T., Wettimuny S., Telesford B., Costantino T., McGinn J.T. Depression, disability, and quality of life after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective 9-month follow-up study. Hear. Lung J. Acute Crit. Care. 2011;40:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2010.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.King K.M., Colella T.J., Faris P., Thompson D.R. Using the cardiac depression scale in men recovering from coronary artery bypass surgery. J. Clin. Nurs. 2009;18:1617–1624. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Korbmacher B., Ulbrich S., Dalyanoglu H., Lichtenberg A., Schipke J.D., Franz M., Schäfer R. Perioperative and long-term development of anxiety and depression in CABG patients. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013;61:676–681. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kozora E., Kongs S., Collins J., Hattler B., Baltz J., Hampton M., Grover F., Novitzky D., Shroyer L. Cognitive outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010;90:1134–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Macken L.C., Yates B.C., Meza J., Norman J., Barnason S., Pozehl B. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes in coronary artery bypass surgery patients and partners. J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev. 2014;34:130–137. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3182a528ba. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.McGrady A., McGinnis R., Badenhop D., Bentle M., Rajput M. Effects of depression and anxiety on adherence to cardiac rehabilitation. J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev. 2009;29:358–364. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181be7a8f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McKenzie L., Simpson J., Stewart M. The impact of depression on activities of daily living skills in individuals who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Psychol. Health Med. 2009;14:641–653. doi: 10.1080/13548500903254234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Modica M., Castiglioni P., Minotti A., Faini A., Racca V., Ferratini M. Psychological profile in coronary artery by-pass graft patients vs. valve replacement patients entering cardiac rehabilitation after surgery. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:14381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32696-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Moser D.K., Dracup K., Evangelista L.S., Zambroski C.H., Lennie T.A., Chung M.L., Doering L.V., Westlake C., Heo S. Comparison of prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and hostility in elderly patients with heart failure, myocardial infarction, and a coronary artery bypass graft. Hear. Lung J. Acute Crit. Care. 2010;39:378–385. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Murphy B., Elliott P., Higgins R., Le Grande M., Worcester M., Goble A., Tatoulis J. Anxiety and depression after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Most get better, some get worse. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 2008;15:434–440. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282fbc945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nair V.V., Nair J.T.K., Das S., Singh K.K., Kathayanat J.T., Radhakrishnan R., Chooriyil N., Babu A. Lifestyle practices, health problems, and quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting. Indian J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2018;34:476–482. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-0671-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Nemati M.H., Astaneh B. The impact of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on depression and anxiety. J. Cardiovasc. Med. (Hagerstown) 2011;12:401–404. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32834358e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nunes J.K.V.R.S., de Figueiredo Neto J.A., de Sousa R.M.L., Costa V.L.X.D.C., Silva F.M.A.M., da Hora A.F.L.T., da Silva E.L.C., Reis L.M.C.B. Depression after CABG: A prospective study. Braz. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2013;28:491–497. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Okamoto Y., Motomura N., Murashima S., Takamoto S. Anxiety and depression after thoracic aortic surgery or coronary artery bypass. Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann. 2013;21:22–30. doi: 10.1177/0218492312444283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Oldham M.A., Hawkins K.A., Lin I.H., Deng Y., Hao Q., Scoutt L.M., Yuh D.D., Lee H.B. Depression predicts delirium after coronary artery bypass graft surgery independent of cognitive impairment and cerebrovascular disease: An analysis of the neuropsychiatric outcomes after heart surgery study. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2019;27:476–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.12.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Perrotti A., Mariet A.S., Durst C., Monaco F., Vandel P., Monnet E., Chocron S. Relationship between depression and health-related quality of life in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A MOTIV-CABG substudy. Qual. Life Res. 2016;25:1433–1440. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1173-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Perrotti A., Ecarnot F., Monaco F., Dorigo E., Monteleone P., Besch G., Chocron S. Quality of life 10 years after cardiac surgery in adults: A long-term follow-up study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2019;17:88. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1160-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Phillips-Bute B., Mathew J.P., Blumenthal J.A., Morris R.W., Podgoreanu M.V., Smith M., Stafford-Smith M., Grocott H.P., Schwinn D.A., Newman M.F., et al. Relationship of genetic variability and depressive symptoms to adverse events after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Psychosom. Med. 2008;70:953–959. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318187aee6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pourafkari L., Ghaffari S., Tajlil A., Shahamfar J., Hedayati S., Nader N.D. The impact of cardiac rehabilitation program on anxiety and depression levels after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Cor Vasa. 2016;58:e384–e390. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2016.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rezaei O., Komeilian R., Fattah L., Mandegar M.H., Dolatshahi B. Quality of life and mental disorders in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. World Appl. Sci. J. 2013;26:34–38. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(15)30492-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sandau K.E., Lindquist R.A., Treat-Jacobson D., Savik K. Health-related quality of life and subjective neurocognitive function three months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Hear. Lung J. Acute Crit. Care. 2008;37:161–172. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Schwarz N., Schoenburg M., Möllmann H., Kastaun S., Kaps M., Bachmann G., Sammer G., Hamm C., Walther T., Gerriets T. Cognitive decline and ischemic microlesions after coronary catheterization. A comparison to coronary artery bypass grafting. Am. Heart J. 2011;162:756–763. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sorensen E.A., Wang F. Social support, depression, functional status, and gender differences in older adults undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Hear. Lung J. Acute Crit. Care. 2009;38:306–317. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Spezzaferri R., Modica M., Racca V., Ripamonti V., Tavanelli M., Brambilla G., Ferratini M. Psychological disorders after coronary artery by-pass surgery: A one-year prospective study. Monaldi Arch. Chest Dis. Arch. Monaldi Mal. Torace. 2009;72:200–205. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2009.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Stenman M., Sartipy U. Depression screening in cardiac surgery patients. Hear. Lung Circ. 2019;28:953–958. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.04.298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Thomas M., Hariharan M., Rana S. Psychological distress as predictor of adherence and prognosis among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Indian Acad. Appl. Psychol. 2016;42:161–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tsai M.F., Tsay S.F., Moser D., Huang T.Y., Tsai F.C. Examining symptom trajectories that predict worse outcomes in post-CABG patients. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2019;18:204–214. doi: 10.1177/1474515118809906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tully P.J., Baker R.A., Turnbull D., Winefield H. The role of depression and anxiety symptoms in hospital readmissions after cardiac surgery. J. Behav. Med. 2008;31:281–290. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9153-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tully P.J., Winefield H.R., Baker R.A., Turnbull D.A., De Jonge P. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory-II and the association with cardiac morbidity and mortality after coronary revascularization. J. Health Psychol. 2011;16:584–595. doi: 10.1177/1359105310383604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yang L., Wang J., Zhang L.Z., Hou J.H., Yuan X., Hu S., Zheng Z. Preoperative high-sensitivity C-reactive protein predicts depression in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: A single-center prospective observational study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012;144:500–505. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yang P., Huang G., Tsai C., Lou M. Sleep quality and emotional correlates in taiwanese coronary artery bypass graft patients 1 week and 1 month after hospital discharge: A repeated descriptive correlational study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0136431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Yüksel V., Gorgulu Y., Cinar R.K., Huseyin S., Sonmez M.B., Canbaz S. Impact of experiencing acute coronary syndrome prior to open heart surgery on psychiatric status. Braz. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2016;31:281–286. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20160064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zimmerman L., Barnason S., Young L., Tu C., Schulz P., Abbott A. Symptom profiles of coronary artery bypass surgery patients at risk for poor functioning outcomes. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2010;25:292–300. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181cfba00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Gong Y., Han T., Yin X., Yang G., Zhuang R., Chen Y., Lu Z. Prevalence of depressive symptoms and work-related risk factors among nurses in public hospitals in southern China: A cross-sectional study. Sci. Rep. 2015;4:1–5. doi: 10.1038/srep07109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Tully P.J., Bennetts J.S., Baker R.A., McGavigan A.D., Turnbull D.A., Winefield H.R. Anxiety, depression, and stress as risk factors for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Hear. Lung J. Acute Crit. Care. 2011;40:4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Botzet K., Dalyanoglu H., Schäfer R., Lichtenberg A., Schipke J.D., Korbmacher B. Anxiety and depression in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery: A prospective clinical study. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2018;66:530–536. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Boyer B.A., Matour S.J., Crittenden K.B., Larson K.A., Cox J.M., Link D.D. Appraisals of fear, helplessness, and perceived life-threat during emergent cardiac surgery: Relationship to pre-surgical depression, trauma history, and posttraumatic stress. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings. 2013;20:173–185. doi: 10.1007/s10880-012-9330-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Poole L., Ronaldson A., Kidd T., Leigh E., Jahangiri M., Steptoe A. Pre-surgical depression and anxiety and recovery following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J. Behav. Med. 2017;40:249–258. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9775-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Murphy B., Rogerson M., Worcester M., Elliott P., Higgins R., Le Grande M., Turner A., Goble A. Predicting mortality 12 years after an acute cardiac event: Comparison between inhospital and 2-month assessment of depressive symptoms in women. J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev. 2013;33:160–167. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318283927f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kendel F., Dunkel A., Müller-Tasch T., Steinberg K., Lehmkuhl E., Hetzer R., Regitz-Zagrosek V. Gender differences in health-related quality of life after coronary bypass surgery: Results from a 1-year follow-up in propensity-matched men and women. Psychosom. Med. 2011;73:280–285. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182114d35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Bjørnnes A.K., Parry M., Lie I., Falk R., Leegaard M., Rustøen T. The association between hope, marital status, depression and persistent pain in men and women following cardiac surgery. BMC Womens. Health. 2018;18:2. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0501-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Geulayov G., Novikov I., Dankner D., Dankner R. Symptoms of depression and anxiety and 11-year all-cause mortality in men and women undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. J. Psychosom. Res. 2018;105:106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Lie I., Arnesen H., Sandvik L., Hamilton G., Bunch E.H. Predictors for physical and mental health 6months after coronary artery bypass grafting. A cohort study. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2010;9:238–243. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Patron E., Messerotti Benvenuti S., Palomba D. Preoperative and perioperative predictors of reactive and persistent depression after cardiac surgery: A three-month follow-up study. Psychosomatics. 2014;55:261–271. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2013.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tindle H., Belnap B.H., Houck P.R., Mazumdar S., Scheier M.F., Matthews K.A., He F., Rollman B.L. Optimism, response to treatment of depression, and rehospitalization after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Psychosom. Med. 2012;74:200–207. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318244903f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bruce K.M., Yelland G.W., Smith J.A., Robinson S.R. Recovery of cognitive function after coronary artery bypass graft operations. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2013;95:1306–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Roohafza H., Sadeghi M., Khani A., Andalib E., Alikhasi H., Rafiei M. Psychological state in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention and their spouses. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 2015;21:214–220. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Oldham M.A., Vachon J., Yuh D., Lee H.B. Cognitive outcomes after heart valve surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2018;66:2327–2334. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Haschke A., Hutter N., Baumeister H. Indirect costs in patients with coronary artery disease and mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 2012;25:319–329. doi: 10.2478/s13382-012-0042-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Morone N.E., Weiner D.K., Belnap B.H., Karp J.F., Mazumdar S., Houck P.R., He F., Rollman B.L. The impact of pain and depression on recovery after coronary artery bypass grafting. Psychosom. Med. 2010;72:620–625. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181e6df90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Khoury H., Sanaiha Y., Rudasill S.E., Mardock A.L., Sareh S., Benharash P. Readmissions following isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the United States (from the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2010 to 2014) Am. J. Cardiol. 2019;124:205–210. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Koivula M., Halme N., Åstedt-Kurki P. Predictors of depressive symptoms among coronary heart disease patients: A cross-sectional study nine years after coronary artery bypass grafting. Hear. Lung J. Acute Crit. Care. 2010;39:421–431. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Sharif F., Shoul A., Janati M., Kojuri J., Zare N. The effect of cardiac rehabilitation on anxiety and depression in patients undergoing cardiac bypass graft surgery in Iran. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2012;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-12-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Kabboul N., Tomlinson G., Francis T., Grace S., Chaves G., Rac V., Daou-Kabboul T., Bielecki J., Alter D., Krahn M. Comparative effectiveness of the core components of cardiac rehabilitation on mortality and morbidity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2018;7:514. doi: 10.3390/jcm7120514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Dao T.K., Youssef N.A., Armsworth M., Wear E., Papathopoulos K.N., Gopaldas R. Randomized controlled trial of brief cognitive behavioral intervention for depression and anxiety symptoms preoperatively in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2011;142:e109–e115. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.02.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hare D.L., Davis C.R. Cardiac depression scale: Validation of a new depression scale for cardiac patients. J. Psychosom. Res. 1996;40:379–386. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(95)00612-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Radloff L.S. The CES-D Scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1977;1:385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Nieveen J.L., Zimmerman L.M., Barnason S.A., Yates B.C. Development and content validity testing of the Cardiac Symptom Survey in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Hear. Lung J. Acute Crit. Care. 2008;37:17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Brown T.A., Chorpita B.F., Korotitsch W., Barlow D.H. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behav. Res. Ther. 1997;35:79–89. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00068-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sanavio S., Bertolotti G., Michielin P., Vidotto G., Zotti A. Cognitive Behavioural Assessment 2.0, Scale Primarie. Organizzazioni Speciali; Firenze, Italy: 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Sheikh J.I., Yesavage J.A. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin. Gerontol. J. Aging Ment. Heal. 1986;5:165–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Zuckerman M., Lubin B. Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist. Educational and Industrial Testing Service; San Diego, CA, USA: 1965. [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., Williams J.B.W. The patient health questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener. Med. Care. 2003;41:1284–1292. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., Williams J.B.W. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001;16:606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.McNair D., Lor M., Droppeman L. Profile of Mood States Manual. Educational and Industrial Testing Service; San Diego, CA, USA: 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zung W.W.K. A Self-Rating depression scale. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1965;12:63–70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Derogatis L.R. SCL-90-R, Administration, Scoring & Procedures Manual-II for the Revised Version and Other Instruments of the Psychopathology Rating Scale Series. Clinical Psychometric Research; Townson, MD, USA: 1992. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES