Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2020 Jun 25;63(8):779–786. doi: 10.1111/myc.13129

Effects of antifungal stewardship using therapeutic drug monitoring in voriconazole therapy on the prevention and control of hepatotoxicity and visual symptoms: A multicentre study conducted in Japan

Yukihiro Hamada 1, Takashi Ueda 2,, Yoshitsugu Miyazaki 3, Kazuhiko Nakajima 2, Keiko Fukunaga 4, Taiga Miyazaki 5, Nana Nakada‐Motokawa 5, Miki Nagao 6, Hideki Kawamura 7, Akari Shigemi 7, Fumiya Ebihara 1, Toshimi Kimura 1, Kazuhiro Ikegame 4, Motoi Uchino 8, Hiroki Ikeuchi 8, Yoshio Takesue 2
PMCID: PMC7496238  PMID: 32510723

Summary

Background

Hepatotoxicity and visual symptoms are common adverse effects (AEs) of voriconazole therapy.

Objective

To retrospectively evaluate the effects of treatment modification based on therapeutic drug monitoring on AEs in patients undergoing voriconazole therapy.

Methods

The target voriconazole trough concentration (C min) was 1‐5 µg/mL. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine C min cut‐offs for AEs.

Results

A total of 401 patients were included. Among 108 patients with high initial C min, voriconazole was discontinued in 32 and the dose was reduced in 71. Among 44 patients with low initial C min, voriconazole was discontinued in 4 and the dose was increased in 19. Hepatotoxicity occurred in 6.0% of patients, after a median of 10 days. Visual symptoms were evident in 9.5% of patients after a median of 4 days. Initial C min was significantly associated with visual symptoms but not hepatotoxicity, which suggested the effect of treatment modification on hepatotoxicity. However, both hepatotoxicity and visual symptoms were significantly correlated with C min at the onset of AEs, and the C min cut‐offs were 3.5 μg/mL for hepatotoxicity and 4.2 μg/mL for visual symptoms. Voriconazole was discontinued after the occurrence of AEs in 62.5% of patients with hepatotoxicity but only 26.3% of patients with visual symptoms. With dose adjustment, treatment was completed in 8/9 patients with hepatotoxicity and 27/28 patients with visual symptoms.

Conclusions

A significant preventive effect was demonstrated on hepatotoxicity, but not on visual symptoms because of earlier occurrence. With treatment modification after the occurrence of AEs, most patients completed therapy.

Keywords: antifungal stewardship, hepatotoxicity, therapeutic drug monitoring, visual symptoms, voriconazole

1. INTRODUCTION

Voriconazole is an antifungal agent that is used to treat invasive aspergillosis and invasive candidiasis. 1 , 2 It is associated with adverse side effects including visual symptoms, neurological disorders and hepatotoxicity. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 Xing et al 9 comprehensively compared voriconazole‐induced toxicity with other antifungals, and there were significant differences in hepatotoxicity (odds ratio [OR] 1.60), visual symptoms (OR 6.50) and neurotoxicity (OR 1.99). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is used to guide voriconazole therapy to prevent drug‐related adverse events and to improve clinical responses by individualising dose regimens. 10 , 11

Park et al 12 recently demonstrated the clinical efficacy of TDM in patients taking voriconazole in a randomised clinical study. Voriconazole TDM significantly reduced drug discontinuation due to adverse effects, and a higher proportion of patients achieved a clinical response with TDM compared to the non‐TDM group. This is particularly important for Asian populations. Voriconazole is metabolised primarily via CYP2C19, and to a lesser extent CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. 13 Allelic polymorphism of CYP2C19 has been reported, and CYP2C19 non–wild‐type alleles are generally found in 60%‐70% of people in Asian populations but only 30% of Caucasian and African Americans. 14 Voriconazole concentrations can be as much as four times higher in individuals with non–wild‐type alleles than in those with wild‐type alleles. 15 , 16 These observations imply that Japanese individuals taking voriconazole are at a comparatively high risk of hepatotoxicity because of their genetic background. Jin et al 17 conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the optimal voriconazole trough concentration (C min) and reported that C min > 3 μg/mL was associated with increased hepatotoxicity in Asians but not in other races.

In many institutions, monitoring serum voriconazole concentrations has become routine, and antimicrobial stewardship programmes incorporate TDM. Notably however, few studies have assessed the effects of antifungal stewardship using voriconazole TDM in real clinical settings. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the influence of treatment modification of voriconazole based on initial C min on the prevention of adverse effects, and the capacity of treatment modification after the occurrence of adverse effects to enable continued effective voriconazole therapy in Japanese patients.

2. PATIENTS AND METHODS

2.1. Setting

Patients aged ≥18 years who were receiving voriconazole were being monitored by an antimicrobial stewardship team and had had their voriconazole C min measured at least once during therapy was eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were prophylactic use of voriconazole and unconsciousness precluding the determination of visual symptoms. This retrospective study was conducted at five hospitals in Japan between April 2015 and March 2018. Medical records were individually reviewed at each study site using a standardised data collection template to collect demographic information and clinical data on adverse events, as well as voriconazole dosing information. Hepatotoxicity was evaluated using laboratory data obtained at least once a week or at the time of TDM. Proven invasive fungal infection and probable/possible fungal infection were diagnosed in accordance with previously reported criteria. 18 , 19 , 20

2.2. Dosage adjustment and therapeutic drug monitoring

An adequate voriconazole dose was defined as a loading dose of 5‐6 mg/kg twice daily followed by a maintenance dose of 3‐4 mg/kg twice daily. The maintenance dose was decreased to 1.5‐2 mg/kg in patients with liver dysfunction (Child‐Pugh A‐C). 21 Because the dose was calculated on the basis of body weight, dose rounding within 10% of the recommended dose was considered as appropriate. Optimal timing of TDM was defined as 4‐10 days after the start of therapy. 21 Voriconazole concentrations were measured using high‐performance liquid chromatography. The lower limit of quantification of the assay was 0.1 μg/mL; therefore, <0.1 μg/mL was recorded as zero for the purposes of data analysis. The target voriconazole C min was set at 1‐5 µg/mL in the current study (≥1‐2 µg/mL for efficacy and <4‐5 µg/mL to prevent adverse effects 21 ). Relationships between well‐known concentration‐dependent adverse effects including hepatic dysfunction and visual symptoms and C min (initial C min and C min at the onset of adverse effects) were analysed.

2.3. Adverse effects

Elevations in liver function test results including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase and bilirubin were recorded, and adverse events were graded in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. 22 Hepatic dysfunction was defined as AST or ALT levels at or above three times the upper limit of normal. If the AST or ALT baseline was abnormal, hepatic dysfunction was defined as AST or ALT at or above three times the baseline. Any visual symptoms during therapy including changes in colour perception, blurred vision, bright spots, wavy lines and photophobia were considered to be adverse effects caused by voriconazole. Visual hallucinations are usually classified as a symptom of neurotoxicity, but because clearly differentiating them from visual symptoms can be challenging, they were included as visual symptoms in the current study.

2.4. Statistical methods

The data were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). The chi‐squared test was used to analyse categorical data, and the paired t test was used to analyse continuous data. Statistical analysis was performed with spss ver. 24 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). P < .05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance. Cut‐off values were the maximum area under the curve (AUC) as determined via a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Patient characteristics

Overall, data from 583 patients were reported. Of these, 182 in whom voriconazole use was prophylactic were excluded from the study, and 401 in whom voriconazole was used for treatment were included. The median duration (IQR) of follow‐up was 48 days (23‐129). Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were 99/401 (24.7%) patients with proven invasive fungal infection (candidiasis 46, aspergillosis 37, cryptococcosis 9 and ‘other’ 8. One patient had two different fungal infections. There were a further 209 (52.1%) patients with probable/possible fungal infections, and in 93 (23.2%) patients, no fungal infections were diagnosed. Haematological malignancy was the most common underlying condition (39.2%). The routes of initial administration were intravenous in 119 patients and oral in 282 patients. Intravenous administration was selected in 111/340 patients (32.6%) with estimated glomerular filtration rates ≥30 and 2/26 patients (7.7%) with estimated glomerular filtration rates <30, and in 6/35 patients (17.1%) who underwent intermittent haemodialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy. Oral step down was performed in 48/119 patients (40.3%) in whom intravenous administration was selected initially. The median duration (IQR) of voriconazole treatment was 30 days (14‐117).

TABLE 1.

Patient demographic and clinical characteristics

Factors Total population of the study (n = 401)
Age (range) 61.8 ± 15.5 (18‐91)
Male/female, no. of patients 228/173
Body weight (range) 51.7 ± 10.5 (28.6‐110.6)
Primary disease, no. of patients (rate)
Haematological malignancy 157 (39.2%)
Collagen disease 88 (21.9%)
Solid organ malignancy 39 (9.7%)
Benign respiratory tract disease 23 (5.7%)
Diabetes 17 (4.2%)
Inflammatory bowel disease 17 (4.2%)
Skin and soft tissue disease 12 (3.0%)
Solid organ transplantation 4 (1.0%)
Liver cirrhosis 13 (3.2%) (Child‐Pugh A, 2; B, 4; C, 7)
Chronic renal disease 7 (1.7%)
Neurological disease 6 (1.5%)
Other 31 (7.7%)
Diagnosis of the fungal disease, no. of patients (rate)
Proven 99 (24.7%)
Candidiasis 46
Aspergillosis 37 (coinfection with cryptococcosis: 1)
Cryptococcosis 9
Other 8
Probable/possible 209 (52.1%)
Undiagnosed (empirical therapy) 93 (23.2%)
Route of administration in initial therapy
Intravenous 119 (29.7%)
Oral 282 (70.3%)

3.2. Dosage adjustment and timing of initial therapeutic drug monitoring

Loading doses were administered to 65.8% of patients. The median dose (IQR) on the initial day of treatment was 5.9 mg/kg twice daily (5.4‐6.1) in patients who received a loading dose. The median maintenance dose was 3.8 mg/kg twice daily (IQR 3.2‐4.1) and the rate of adherence to the standard dose was 75.1%. Low adherence to a reduced dose (3/13 patients, 23.1%) was observed in patients with liver cirrhosis. The median day of TDM after the start of therapy was 6 (IQR 5‐7), and the rate of adherence to adequate timing was 88.5%. TDM was performed a median (IQR) of two times (1‐4) for each patient. The rate of adherence to both the recommended dosing regimen and the recommended TDM timing was 56.4% (226/401 patients).

3.3. Voriconazole trough concentration

The median initial C min was 3.33 μg/mL (IQR 1.90‐5.13). In patients with adequate dosing including the loading dose and adequate TDM timing, the median initial C min (IQR) was 3.91 μg/mL (2.50‐5.48). In total, 29.6% of patients had high C min (≥5 μg/mL), whereas only 6.6% of patients had low C min (<1 μg/mL, Table 2). In 26 patients with sequential therapy (intravenous to oral administration and oral to intravenous administration) whose dose was not altered when the administration route was changed, C min was significantly lower in patients who were treated orally than in those treated intravenously (median [IQR]: 2.30 [1.50‐2.76] µg/mL vs 3.00 [2.19‐3.40] µg/mL, P = .005), and the median oral bioavailability (IQR) was 83.9% (74.2‐90.4). In an individual patient‐based comparison, C min was lower in all patients treated orally, excluding one patient who developed herpes zoster after switching oral therapy. This patient was treated with acyclovir, acetaminophen and pregabalin, and worsening of liver function, which might influence the voriconazole concentration was not observed (Figure S1). The median C min was 4.26 µg/mL in patients with Child‐Pugh A and B, vs 3.57 µg/mL in patients with Child‐Pugh C. In patients without maintenance dose reduction, median C min was 4.26 and 3.79 µg/mL, respectively.

TABLE 2.

Initial voriconazole trough concentration (C min)

Initial C min Total (n = 401) Adequate dosing and timing of TDM (n = 226)

Median

(interquartile range) (μg/mL)

3.33 (1.90‐5.13) 3.91 (2.50‐5.48)
C min categories
<1 μg/mL 44 (11.0%) 15 (6.6%)

1‐5 μg/mL

(target concentration range)

249 (62.1%) 144 (63.7%)
≥5 μg/mL 108 (26.9%) 67 (29.6%)

Abbreviation: TDM, therapeutic drug monitoring.

3.4. Modification for voriconazole treatment according to initial trough concentration

Some modification was performed in 103/108 patients (95.4%) with high initial C min (discontinuation 32, dose reduction 71) and in 23/44 patients (52.3%) with low initial C min (discontinuation 4, dose increase 19). Subsequent TDM was performed in 89.5% of patients who underwent dose reductions, all patients who underwent dose increases, and 70.5% of patients who did not undergo any dose adjustment. With regard to the effects of dose adjustment, C min subsequently reached the target range (1‐5 μg/mL) in 87.0% of patients with dose reductions, and 88.0% of patients with dose increases. In total, 87.3% of patients who underwent dose adjustment subsequently achieved a C min within the target range (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Subsequent trough concentration (C min) according to voriconazole dose adjustment based on initial C min

Dose adjustment Subsequent C min (μg/mL)
<1 1‐5 ≥5 Total No data available
Dose adjustment (n = 120) 3 (2.7%) 96 (87.3%) 11 (10.0%) 110 (100%) 10
Dose reduction (n = 95) 1 (1.2%) 74 (87.0%) 10 (11.8%) 85 (100%) 10
Dose increase (n = 25) 2 (8.0%) 22 (88.0%) 1 (4.0%) 25 (100%) 0
Same dose (n = 220) 18 (11.6%) 128 (82.6%) 9 (5.8%) 155 (100%) 65

3.5. Adverse effects and voriconazole trough concentration

Hepatotoxicity occurred in 24 patients (6.0%), and visual symptoms were reported by 38 patients (9.5%) (photophobia 14, visual hallucination 7, altered colour perception 6, blurred vision 5, visual field abnormality 4, bright spots 3, wavy lines 3). An opioid that can also result in visual symptoms was administered concomitantly in one patient who complained of visual symptoms. The rates of voriconazole discontinuation because of a drug‐related adverse effect were 2.5% (10/401) in the hepatotoxicity group and 2.7% (11/401) in the visual symptom group. The median timepoints of adverse effect onset after the start of therapy were day 10 for hepatotoxicity and day 4 for visual symptoms (P < .001). Adverse effects occurred 8 days after voriconazole initiation or earlier in 50.0% of patients with hepatotoxicity and 81.6% of patients with visual symptoms (P = .009). In the total study population, the incidence of early occurrence (≤8 days) of adverse effects in patients with visual symptoms was significantly higher than that in patients with hepatotoxicity (7.7% vs 3.0%, P = .003).

The ROC curve of initial C min and C min at the onset of adverse effects used to predict adverse effects (C min at last TDM during therapy was used in patients without adverse effects) is shown in Figure 1. Although higher initial C min was associated with visual symptoms (AUC 0.603, cut‐off 4.9 μg/mL, OR 3.59, P = .037), there was no significant correlation between hepatotoxicity and initial C min (AUC 0.562, cut‐off 3.6 μg/mL, OR 1.67, P = .292). In contrast, C min at the onset of adverse effects was significantly associated with hepatotoxicity (AUC 0.725, OR 5.20, P < .001) and visual symptoms (AUC 0.684, OR 5.89, P < .001), and the C min cut‐offs for predicting the occurrence of adverse effects were 3.5 μg/mL for hepatotoxicity and 4.2 μg/mL for visual symptoms.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Receiver operating characteristic curve of initial trough concentration (C min) and C min at the occurrence of adverse effects to predict adverse effects

Voriconazole was discontinued within 3 days in 15/24 patients (62.5%) with hepatotoxicity and 10/38 patients (26.3%) with visual symptoms (P = .005). Among patients in whom voriconazole was continued, the dose was reduced in 8/9 patients (88.9%) with hepatotoxicity. In contrast, dose reduction was only performed in 11/28 patients (39.3%) who reported visual symptoms (P = .019).

In patients with ≥5 μg/mL of C min at the onset of adverse effects, dosages were reduced in 62.5% of patients with hepatotoxicity and 57.9% of patients who reported visual symptoms. Voriconazole was discontinued in 75.0% of patients with hepatotoxicity who had a C min 1‐5 μg/mL, because there was no subsequent target C min for dose adjustment. In contrast, voriconazole was only discontinued in 23.5% of patients who reported visual symptoms and had a C min 1‐5 μg/mL. After dose reduction, all patients with hepatotoxicity and 90.0% of patients who reported visual symptoms subsequently achieved a C min within the target range. Adverse effects were improved, and voriconazole therapy was completed in 8/9 patients with hepatotoxicity (88.9%) and 27/28 patients who reported visual symptoms (96.4%). One patient in whom visual symptoms did not improve had concomitantly used opioids. In seven patients with visual hallucination, the initial median C min was 4.87 μg/mL. Although voriconazole was continued (the same dose in six patients and dose reduction in one patient), visual hallucination improved in all patients.

4. DISCUSSION

Achieving the target C min is important for preventing adverse effects and improving clinical efficacy. 21 Pascual et al 23 reported that median C min was 2.9 μg/mL in patients on ≥8 mg of voriconazole per day, and 1.7 μg/mL in patients on 7 mg/kg per day. Racil et al 24 reported that half of the patients had a median C min of <1.0 μg/mL, and C min was only >5.0 μg/mL in 3.1% of patients. Compared with these previous reports, higher C min was evident in Japanese patients who fulfilled standard dosing criteria and those with TDM obtained at an appropriate time in the current study, a third of patients had high C min, and only 5% had low C min. These results suggest that TDM should be mandatory in Japanese patients who are prone to adverse effects when they exhibit high voriconazole concentrations.

In the present study, there was a clear correlation between adverse effects and C min at the onset of adverse effects, and the C min cut‐offs for predicting adverse effects were 3.5 μg/mL for hepatotoxicity and 4.2 μg/mL for visual symptoms. Notably however, there was no significant association between initial C min and the subsequent development of hepatotoxicity. Chu et al 25 reported that there was no association between increased hepatotoxicity at voriconazole levels >5.5 mg/L. In another multicentre study that included 264 patients with haematological diseases, there was also no correlation between C min and voriconazole toxicity. 24 Those studies raise the question of the utility of routine clinical monitoring of voriconazole plasma concentrations. Notably however, those results and the results of the present study should be assessed with caution. Treatment modification including dose adjustment based on initial C min may prevent adverse effects that could subsequently occur thereafter. In the current study, treatment modification was conducted in almost all patients with high initial C min. After dose adjustment, C min within the target range was achieved in approximately 90% of patients. As a consequence, only 6.0% of patients in the present study had hepatotoxicity, which is much lower than previously reported frequencies. 3 , 4 , 26 , 27 In a multicentre study conducted by Saito et al, 3 16.9% of treated patients had hepatotoxicity. Luong et al 4 reported that 51% of patients who were treated with voriconazole developed hepatotoxicity, and 34% of them had to discontinue the treatment for that reason. In a systematic review and meta‐analysis, Xing et al 9 reported that hepatotoxicity occurred in 17.7% of patients who underwent voriconazole therapy.

In the present study, there was a significant correlation between initial C min and visual symptoms, possibly because of the comparatively earlier occurrence of this adverse effect. TDM was conducted a median of 6 days after the initiation of voriconazole treatment, C min was usually recorded 2 days later, and in total, at least 8 days was required before the results of TDM were observed. Given the comparatively early onset of visual symptoms, treatment modification arising from initial TDM results before the occurrence of adverse effects could not be conducted in approximately 80% of patients who reported visual symptoms. Other authors have also reported that visual symptoms and hallucinations tended to occur during the first week of therapy and that symptoms were reduced or disappeared despite continued therapy in most patients. 8 , 28 , 29

As antifungal stewardship for patients with adverse effects, voriconazole discontinuation or dose reduction was more frequently performed in patients with hepatotoxicity than in those who reported visual symptoms, and natural remission of visual symptoms was expected. With dose reduction, all patients with hepatotoxicity subsequently achieved a C min that was within the target range, and hepatotoxicity was improved in 88.9% of patients. In contrast, visual symptoms were improved irrespective of dose adjustment in almost all patients.

The present study had some limitations. First, this was a retrospective study in a defined population, and the results may not be applicable to other populations. Second, polymorphisms in CYP2C19 that are known to influence drug metabolism 14 were not determined in the study. Third, patients with candidiasis, aspergillosis and cryptococcosis and those with empirical therapy were all included in the study, rendering the study sample relatively heterogeneous in this regard. The outcomes according to the voriconazole plasma concentration may differ among patients with these types of fungal infections, 30 and relationships between C min and clinical success were not evaluated. Finally, although no previous studies evaluated the safety of voriconazole in patients with Child‐Pugh C severe liver disease, we included seven patients with Child‐Pugh C disease.

In conclusion, in the current study the high performance of voriconazole treatment modification based on initial C min by way of an antifungal stewardship programme was confirmed in clinical practice in Japan, and the results of the study suggest that it may promote a low incidence of hepatotoxicity. The chance of optimising voriconazole levels based on the initial TDM result was low in patients who reported visual symptoms, however, because of their comparatively earlier onset. In addition to the above‐described preventive effects on hepatotoxicity, modification of therapy after the occurrence of adverse effects had a substantial capacity to facilitate continuation and completion of voriconazole therapy.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Y. Takesue has received grant support from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., and Shionogi & Co., Ltd., and payment for lectures from Astellas Pharma Inc, and MSD Japan. T. Miyazaki has received grants from Pfizer and MSD and lectures honoraria from Pfizer, MSD, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma and Astellas Pharma. Y. Miyazaki has received payment for lectures from Astellas Pharma Inc, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co. Ltd. and MSD Japan. Other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Yukihiro Hamada: Investigation (equal); Writing‐original draft (supporting). Takashi Ueda: Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (equal); Methodology (lead); Writing‐original draft (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Yoshitsugu Miyazaki: Supervision (equal). Kazuhiko Nakajima: Investigation (supporting). Keiko Fukunaga: Investigation (equal). Taiga Miyazaki: Investigation (supporting). Nana Nakada‐Motokawa: Investigation (equal). Miki Nagao: Investigation (equal). Hideki Kawamura: Investigation (supporting). Akari Shigemi: Investigation (equal). Fumiya Ebihara: Investigation (equal). Toshimi Kimura: Investigation (supporting). Kazuhiro Ikegame: Investigation (supporting). Motoi Uchino: Investigation (supporting). Hiroki Ikeuchi: Investigation (supporting). Yoshio Takesue: Conceptualization (equal); Project administration (equal); Writing‐original draft (lead); Writing‐review & editing (lead).

ETHICAL APPROVAL

The study was approved by the institutional review boards of Hyogo College of Medicine (No. 2996), Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital (No. 5012), Nagasaki University Hospital (No. 18111912), Kyoto University Hospital (No. E2300) and Kagoshima University (No. 180225).

Supporting information

Fig S1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr Owen Proudfoot from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Hamada Y, Ueda T, Miyazaki Y, et al. Effects of antifungal stewardship using therapeutic drug monitoring in voriconazole therapy on the prevention and control of hepatotoxicity and visual symptoms: A multicentre study conducted in Japan. Mycoses. 2020;63:779–786. 10.1111/myc.13129

Yukihiro Hamada and Takashi Ueda contributed equally to this study.

All authors meet the ICMJE authorship criteria.

Funding information

This research was supported by the Agency for Medical Research and Development (grant number JP18fk0108045). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, et al. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:327‐360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ullmann AJ, Akova M, Herbrecht R, et al. ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: adults with haematological malignancies and after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(Suppl 7):53‐67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Saito T, Fujiuchi S, Tao Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: experience in Japan. Infection. 2012;40:661‐667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Luong ML, Hosseini‐Moghaddam SM, Singer LG, et al. Risk factors for voriconazole hepatotoxicity at 12 weeks in lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1929‐1935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zonios DI, Gea‐Banacloche J, Childs R, et al. Hallucinations during voriconazole therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:e7‐e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Imhof A, Schaer DJ, Schwarz U, et al. Neurological adverse events to voriconazole: evidence for therapeutic drug monitoring. Swiss Med Wkly. 2006;136:739‐742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Boyd AE, Modi S, Howard SJ, et al. Adverse reactions to voriconazole. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1241‐1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Walsh TJ, Pappas P, Winston DJ, et al. Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:225‐234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Xing Y, Chen LU, Feng Y, et al. Meta‐analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Andes D, Pascual A, Marchetti O. Antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: established and emerging indications. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:24‐34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Neely M, Rushing T, Kovacs A, et al. Voriconazole pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:27‐36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Park WB, Kim N‐H, Kim K‐H, et al. The effect of therapeutic drug monitoring on safety and efficacy of voriconazole in invasive fungal infections: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1080‐1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Theuretzbacher U, Ihle F, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of voriconazole. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45:649‐663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kimura M, Ieiri I, Mamiya K, et al. Genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450s, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9 in a Japanese population. Ther Drug Monit. 1998;20:243‐247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Johnson LB, Kauffman CA. Voriconazole: a new triazole antifungal agent. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:630‐637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ikeda Y, Umemura K, Kondo K, et al. Pharmacokinetics of voriconazole and cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic status. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75:587‐588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Jin H, Wang T, Falcione BA, et al. Trough concentration of voriconazole and its relationship with efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:1772‐1785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Cuenca‐Estrella M, Verweij PE, Arendrup MC, et al. ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: diagnostic procedures. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(Suppl 7):9‐18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, et al. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:7‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Denning DW, Cadranel J, Beigelman‐Aubry C, et al. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management. Eur Respir J. 2016;47:45‐68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hamada Y, Tokimatsu I, Mikamo H, et al. Practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole: a consensus review of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. J Infect Chemother. 2013;19:381‐392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health . Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 5.0. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; November 27, 2017. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_5x7.pdf. Accessed January 17, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Pascual A, Calandra T, Bolay S, et al. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with invasive mycoses improves efficacy and safety outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:201‐211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Racil Z, Winterova J, Kouba M, et al. Monitoring trough voriconazole plasma concentrations in haematological patients: real life multicentre experience. Mycoses. 2012;55:483‐492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chu HY, Jain R, Xie HU, et al. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring: retrospective cohort study of the relationship to clinical outcomes and adverse events. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Matsumoto K, Ikawa K, Abematsu K, et al. Correlation between voriconazole trough plasma concentration and hepatotoxicity in patients with different CYP2C19 genotypes. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34:91‐94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Dolton MJ, Ray JE, Chen SA, et al. Multicenter study of voriconazole pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4793‐4799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Purkins L, Wood N, Ghahramani P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of voriconazole following intravenous‐ to oral‐dose escalation regimens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:2546‐2553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kato H, Hagihara M, Hamada Y, et al. Visual disturbance or central symptom like hallucination in patients treated voriconazole: report of six cases. Jpn J Antibiot. 2016;69:143‐150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Troke PF, Hockey HP, Hope WW. Observational study of the clinical efficacy of voriconazole and its relationship to plasma concentrations in patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:4782‐4788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig S1


Articles from Mycoses are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES