Highlights
-
•
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP).
-
•
Giant inguinoscrotal hernia.
-
•
Laparoscopic Hernia.
-
•
Minimally invasive surgery.
Keywords: Inguinoscrotal hernia, Case report, Minimally invasive surgery, Laparoscopic surgery
Abstract
Background
Giant inguinoscrotal (GIS) hernias are rarely encountered in clinical settings and are often associated with mental neglect for many years. This type of hernia is defined as “giant” if it descends below the mid-point of the inner thigh of a patient in an upright position. The laparoscopic repair approach of a GIS hernia is technically challenging. It has been claimed that laparoscopic surgery has several advantages over the open surgical approach, with less pain and an earlier recovery. The aim of this video is to evaluate the efficacy of TAPP (laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal) in order to treat a GIS hernia.
Case presentation
A 65-year-old male without a relevant past medical history was admitted to the emergency service with abdominal pain, belching and nausea. He denied any other symptoms, and no previous surgical operations were recorded. Physical examination showed a large mass in the left scrotum below the mid-point of the inner thigh of the patient in an upright position. A CT scan confirmed the diagnosis of a GIS. A laparoscopic TAPP procedure was decided upon as the best course of treatment.
Results
The patient underwent a successful repair procedure. The operation time was 150 min. No intraoperative blood transfusion was necessary. The patient’s diet was resumed on the first day post surgery, and the postoperative hospital stay was three days.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic TAPP repair is a safe and feasible method for surgically managing GIS hernias.
1. Introduction
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most widely performed surgical procedures [1]. Giant inguinoscrotal (GIS) hernias are rarely encountered in clinical settings often associated with mental neglect for many years. This type of hernia is defined as “giant” if it descends below the mid-point of the inner thigh of a patient in an upright position. A GIS hernia can be classified into three types, based on the scrotum length: Type 1 – the scrotum extends below the mid inner thigh; Type 2 – the scrotum extends below an imaginary line at the lower thigh, but above the superior border of patellar bone; and Type 3 – the scrotum extends below the superior borders of the patellar bone [2].
To date, different surgical techniques have been reported in the successful treatment of hernias [3]. The laparoscopic repair approach is technically challenging and there is minimal research in the literature investigating this technique. In the last decade, there has been an increased interest in the laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair, mainly represented as the trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) technique [[4], [5], [6]].
The aim of this video is to evaluate the efficacy of TAPP in order to treat a GIS hernia.
2. Case presentation
A 65-year-old male with no relevant past medical history was admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain, belching and nausea. He denied any other symptoms. No allergies were reported and no previous surgical operations were recorded. Physical examination of the patient showed a large mass in the left scrotum below the mid-point of the inner thigh in an upright position. A CT scan confirmed the diagnosis of GIS. A laparoscopic TAPP procedure was decided as the best form of treatment, as shown in the video. The optical port was placed at the umbilical and the operating ports were placed in the umbilical transversal line. The surgeon stood on the side opposite the hernia, at about the level of the patient's shoulder. The assistant was across the table from the surgeon, the nurse was to the side of the surgeon and the monitor was at the lower side of the patient. The hernia repair was performed using an ENDOLAP 3D mesh (DynaMesh®), fixed with Histoacryl® glue (Braun Surgical Gmbh, Melsungen, Germany).
The present case was redacted according to the Surgical case report (SCARE) guidelines [7].
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.
3. Results
The patients underwent a successful repair procedure. The operation time was 150 min. No intraoperative blood transfusion was necessary. Normal diet was restored was on the first day post surgery, and the postoperative hospital stay was three days. No drainage tube was placed. The patient did not suffer a postoperative increase in intra-abdominal pressure, nor was there any abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) accompanied by respiratory dysfunction. The patient presented a seroma that was treated with compression. No recurrence or chronic pain occurred during the follow-up period.
4. Discussion
GIS hernias represent a rare entity in developed countries. Open abdominal and inguinal approaches are commonly used [8]. Inguinoscrotal hernia complications such as organ perforation can occur causing peritonitis and sepsis [9]. Early elective treatment is associated with fewer complications than emergency procedures, as early treatment can avoid visceral resection and potential prosthetic infection [10].
The TAPP approach in inguinal hernia repair has been shown to be a valid alternative to the traditional open approach [5]. Furthermore, the laparoscopic approach shows less post-operative pain and a shorter length of hospital stay [6]. To the best of our knowledge, only a few cases of giant hernias treated with a laparoscopic procedure have been reported in the literature [[11], [12], [13]].
The guidelines for the laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of inguinal hernias describe that the TAPP approach is a possible therapeutic option for inguinoscrotal hernias [14].
Some authors have reported that the TAPP technique for GIS hernias has resulted in recurrences, and the authors have stressed its limitations [13]. The particular case reported was a bilateral GIS hernia, classified as a Type 2, where an open surgical approach would likely have been more appropriate.
There are several experiences published with satisfactory results using the TAPP approach. In studies published by Fujinaka et al. and Momiyama et al. the TAPP technique has been demonstrated as a safe and feasible option for the treatment of GIS hernia [11,12].
We believe that TAPP has many advantages in treating GIS hernias, with the optimal control of hernia contents from the intra-abdominal cavity. Furthermore, pneumoperitoneum, combined with the push and pull manoeuvre, can facilitate the reduction of hernia contents. In our case, the assisted external manipulation of the scrotal sac helps to avoid any testicular injuries. The internal view of the hernial orifice can help to determine the appropriate size of mesh to use, representing an additional advantage of this technique.
The TAPP procedure should be considered a relative contraindication for patients with compromised respiratory and cardiac function due to an increase of the intraabdominal pressure and concomitant ACS.
In order to avoid the development of an ACS, several authors have suggested the preoperative administration of progressive pneumoperitoneum therapy in order to help the patient adapt to breathing [3,14]. The intraperitoneal gas insufflation can be performed continuously or fractionally and could require a prolonged hospital stay [15]. In the literature, other procedures are described that result in an increase of abdominal capacity as a component separation of the abdominal wall [16].
In our case, we did not need to use any procedure to avoid intra-abdominal pressure increase. Our patient was relatively young and without respiratory failure, so the increase of the intra-abdominal pressure was well tolerated.
5. Conclusion
A GIS hernia is an important and challenging surgical disease associated with an impaired quality of life. In the presence of an expert laparoscopic surgeon, TAPP repair is a safe and feasible method for the surgical management of GIS hernias.
Conflicts of interest
All authors are in agreement with the content of the manuscript. The manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors.
We declare that this manuscript is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
Funding
No sources of funding.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Author contribution
Riccardo Caruso proposed the study. Riccardo Caruso performed the research and wrote the first draft. The rest of the authors: Emilio Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, Eduardo Diaz, Hipolito Duran, Isabel Fabra, Luis Malave,Angelo D’Ovidio, Benedetto Ielpo, Ruben Agresott, Valentina Ferri; contributed to the design and interpretation of the study.
Registration of research studies
-
1
Name of the registry:
-
2
Unique identifying number or registration ID:
-
3
Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked):
Guarantor
Riccardo Caruso.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the International Department of Research in General and Digestive Surgery at the Catholic University of Murcia (Spain) Foundation for development and research in oncological surgery. The authors would also like to thank Hipolito Duran, Eduardo Diaz, Isabel Fabra, Luis Malave, and Ruben Agresott for their important contributions.
Footnotes
Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.10.063.
Contributor Information
Riccardo Caruso, Email: ricaruso2@gmail.com.
Emilio Vicente, Email: correo@emiliovicente.es.
Yolanda Quijano, Email: yolandaquijanocollazo@gmail.com.
Angelo D’Ovidio, Email: angdov87@gmail.com.
Benedetto Ielpo, Email: ielpo.b@gmail.com.
Valentina Ferri, Email: valenpeglio@gmail.com.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Claus C.M., Rocha G.M., Campos A.C. Prospective, randomized and controlled study of mesh displacement after laparoscopic inguinal repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh. Surg. Endosc. 2016;30(3) doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4314-7. 1134e1140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Trakarnsagna A., Chinswangwatanakul V., Methasate A. Giant inguinal hernia: report of a case and reviews of surgical techniques. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2014;5 doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.10.042. 868e872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Staubitz J.I., Gassmann P., Kauff D.W., Lang H. Surgical treatment strategies for giant inguinoscrotal hernia - a case report with review of the literature. BMC Surg. 2017;17(December (1)):135. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0331-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bittner R., Montgomery M.A., Arregui E. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society) Surg. Endosc. 2015;29(2) doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3917-8. 289e321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ielpo B., Duran H., Diaz E., Fabra I., Caruso R., Malavé L., Ferri V., Lazzaro S., Kalivaci D., Quijano Y., Vicente E. A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein repair for bilateral inguinal hernias. Am. J. Surg. 2018;216(July (1)):78–83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ielpo B., Nuñez-Alfonsel J., Duran H., Diaz E., Fabra I., Caruso R., Malavé L., Ferri V., Barzola E., Quijano Y., Vicente E. Cost-effectiveness of randomized study of laparoscopic versus open bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Ann. Surg. 2018;268(November (5)):725–730. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Agha R.A., Borrelli M.R., Farwana R., Koshy K., Fowler A., Orgill D.P., For the SCARE Group The SCARE 2018 statement: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines. Int. J. Surg. 2018;60:132–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Staubitz Julia Isabelle, Gassmann Peter, Kauff Daniel Wilhelm, Lang Hauke. Surgical treatment strategies for giant inguinoscrotal hernia – a case report with review of the literature. BMC Surg. 2017;17:135. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0331-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lajevardi S.S., Gundara J.S., Collins S.A., Samra J.S. Acute gastric rupture in a giant inguinoscrotal hernia. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2015;19:2283–2285. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2916-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Monestiroli U.M., Bondurri A., Gandini F., Lenna G., Vellini S., Danelli P. Giant inguinoscrotal hernia. Tech. Coloproctol. 2007;11:283–285. doi: 10.1007/s10151-007-0368-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fujinaka Ryosuke, Urade Takeshi, Fukuoka Eiji, Murata Koichi, Mii Yasuhiko, Sawa Hidehiro, Man-i Mariko, Oka Shigeteru, Iwatani Yoshiteru, Kuroda Daisuke. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for giant inguinal hernias. Asian J. Surg. 2019;42(January (1)):414–419. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Momiyama Masato, Mizutani Fumitoshi, Yamamoto Tatsuyoshi, Aoyama Yoshinori, Hasegawa Hiroshi, Yamamoto Hideo. Treatment of a giant inguinal hernia using transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2016;9:1–3. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjw159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bernhardt G.A., Gruber K., Gruber G. TAPP repair in a giant bilateral scrotal hernia - limits of a method. ANZ J. Surg. 2010;80 doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05561.x. 947e948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moreno I.G. Chronic eventrations and large hernias; preoperative treatment by progressive pneumoperitoneum; original procedure. Surgery. 2020 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Oprea V., Matei O., Gheorghescu D., Leuca D., Buia F., Rosianu M., Dinca M. Progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum (PPP) as an adjunct for surgery of hernias with loss of domain. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2014;109:664–666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ramirez O.M., Ruas E., Dellon A.L. “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1990;86:519–526. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199009000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.