Skip to main content
Nagoya Journal of Medical Science logoLink to Nagoya Journal of Medical Science
. 2021 Feb;83(1):151–157. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.83.1.151

Incidence of Cutibacterium acnes in open shoulder surgery

Yukihiro Kajita 1,2, Yusuke Iwahori 3, Yohei Harada 1, Ryosuke Takahashi 2, Masataka Deie 1
PMCID: PMC7938089  PMID: 33727746

ABSTRACT

In recent years, Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) has been reported to affect postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the detection rate and clinical features of C. acnes infection after open shoulder surgery. Fifty-nine patients (33 males and 26 females; mean age, 69.1 years) were included. Samples were collected from a skin swab at the incision site prior to skin preparation. Further samples were collected from synovial swabs at the glenohumeral joint immediately after incision and before incision closure. Samples with C. acnes-positive skin swab cultures were defined as Group A, and those with negative cultures were defined as Group N. Age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, operation time, presence of deep infection after surgery, and rate of positive synovial swab cultures were compared between groups. There were 27 patients in Group A (mean age 69.1±13.3 [SD], 21 males and 6 females) and 32 patients in Group N (mean age 69.1±11.0 [SD], 12 males and 20 females). No significant difference in the presence of diabetes mellitus and operation time were found between groups. From the glenohumeral joint immediately after incision, C. acnes was detected in 22.2% and 0% of patients in Group A and Group N, respectively. For the glenohumeral joint before incision closure, C. acnes was detected in 22.2% and 0% of patients in Group A and Group N, respectively, demonstrating a significantly higher rate in Group A. Our findings suggest that the route of infection following open shoulder surgery is via contamination.

Key Words: cutibacterium acnes, open shoulder surgery, incidence contamination

INTRODUCTION

Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) is an indigenous bacterium that resides in human skin. The skin commensal bacterium is found in areas of the body such as the head, back, and axilla that are densely distributed with pilosebaceous glands.1,2 Recent studies have reported C. acnes to be implicated in the pathology of shoulder joints and postsurgical outcomes.3-7 Moreover, a growing body of reports have described the bacterium as an organism that can colonize the shoulder joint and cause complications during the perioperative period.2,8

An increasing number of studies on postoperative shoulder infections caused by C. acnes have appeared in the literature. Pauzenberger et al9 demonstrated that after performing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most commonly identified pathogen at 39.3%, followed by C. acnes at 28.6%. Several reports have also illustrated the involvement of C. acnes in the pathology of shoulder arthropathy in addition to postoperative outcomes.3-5 Furthermore, a recent study suggested that C. acnes may be a perioperative contaminant derived from surgical incisions, surgeon’s gloves, and surgical instruments during shoulder arthroplasty.10

Kajita et al11 previously examined the detection rate of C. acnes in arthroscopic surgery. One of the problems that that the authors identified in this study was the use of a cannula for synovial swabs during arthroscopic surgery, and the possibility of washout from inadvertent reflux.

The primary aim of this study was to provide a prospective assessment for the detection rate of C. acnes after open shoulder surgery using the deltopectoral approach. The secondary aim was to identify possible correlations between patient characteristics and results from culture tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient demographics

All participants provided informed consent between April 2016 to April 2017 under a protocol approved by our institutional review board. Patients who underwent open shoulder surgery requiring intraarticular intervention using the deltopectoral approach with a follow-up of at least 2 years were included in this study. A total of 59 patients (33 males and 26 females) underwent shoulder joint surgery, excluding those with a previous history of shoulder surgery, septic shoulder joint, and dermatological disease. The mean age was 69.1 (range, 33–85) years. The surgical procedures included 20 cases of open rotator cuff repair, 20 cases of reverse shoulder replacement for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears, and 19 cases of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for intra-articular fractures. All procedures were performed by a single experienced shoulder surgeon. Within 30 min of beginning the procedure, all patients received a routine antibiotic prophylaxis of 1 g cefazolin. The skin was subsequently prepared using 70% isopropyl alcohol to the exposed shoulder.

Sample Collection

Samples were collected from a skin swab at the incision site prior to skin preparation (Fig. 1A). Further samples were obtained from synovial swabs at the glenohumeral joint immediately after incision (Fig. 1B) and before closing the incision (Fig. 1C). All samples were submitted for culture for a minimum of 3 weeks.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Sites of sample collection

Fig.1A: Deltopectoral approach; swab culture from the skin above the tip of the coracoid process.

Fig.1B: Synovial swab culture, immediately after surgical exposure of the joint.

Fig.1C: Synovial swab culture, immediately after surgical closure of the joint.

Diagnostic assessment

The focus of this study was to evaluate the detection rate of C. acnes from skin swab cultures. Samples with C. acnes-positive swab cultures of the skin were defined as Group A, and those with negative cultures were defined as Group N. The following items were assessed and compared between the two groups: age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus, operation time, results of blood test (preoperative and 2-week postoperative white blood cell count and C-reactive protein values), presence of deep infection after surgery, and rate of positive synovial swab cultures. The minimum follow-up time for a clinical review to exclude infection was 2 years.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed with Statistical Product and Service Solutions (ver. 18.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The t-test, paired t-test, McNemar test, and Chi-squared test were applied for statistical analysis with a significance level of p <0.05.

RESULTS

Group A consisted of 27 patients (mean age, 69.1 ± 13.3 [SD], 21 males and 6 females), and Group N consisted of 32 patients (mean age 69.1 ± 11.0 [SD], 12 males and 20 females). There were significantly more males in Group A. There was no significant difference between diabetic complications and operation time between groups (Table 1). Blood tests that were assessed prior to surgery and within 2 weeks postoperatively showed no significant difference in white blood cell count and C-reactive protein between groups (Fig. 2). Deep infection was not observed in either groups. Immediately after surgical exposure, 6 specimens in Group A (22.2%) and 0 specimens in Group N (0%) were tested positive for C. acnes in the synovial swab culture. Immediately before surgical closure, 6 specimens in Group A (22.2%) and 0 samples (0%) in group N were tested positive immediately before surgical closure. Group A showed a significantly higher number of C acnes-positive specimens (Fig. 3).

Table 1.

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics

Group A Group N P Value
No. of patients n=27 n=32
Follow up (months) 18.4±7.7 18.5±8.2 0.99*
Age (yr.) 69.1±13.3 69.1±11.0 0.98*
Sex (male/female) 21/6 17/19 0.003**
Diabetes [rate] 2 [7.4%] 3 [9.4%] 1.0**
Duration of surgery (min.) 139.9±46.3 118.4±47.0 0.9*

There was a significant difference in the number of C. acnes-positive specimens from skin swabs between sexes. There were no significant differences in other parameters. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number of cases [percentage].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Blood test results (preoperative and 2-week postoperative white blood cell count values)

There were no significant differences in white blood cell values between the two groups in preoperative and 2-week postoperative blood tests.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Blood test results (preoperative and 2-week postoperative C-reactive protein values)

There were no significant differences in C-reactive protein values between the two groups in preoperative and 2-week postoperative blood tests.

DISCUSSION

C. acnes is found in sebaceous glands that lie deeper than the surface of the skin. For this reason, it is known that C. acnes reside in sites with a high density of sebaceous glands. An examination of their distribution in the skin around the hips, shoulders, and knees shows that it is most abundant around the shoulders.5,12 Sebaceous glands are more abundant in males, and it is known that there is a gender-based difference in the detection rate of C. acnes. Chuang et al1 suggested that testosterone, a male hormone, is associated with the colonization of C. acnes, and reported a detection rate of 81.6% for males and 46.1% for females. For the detection rate in swab cultures of the skin around the shoulder joint, Chuang et al1 reported a rate of 81.6% in males and 46.15% in females, while Patel et al12 reported of 80% in males and 30% in females. Both studies reported that C. acnes was detected significantly more in male skin, and our study demonstrated similar results in Group A which included C. acnes-positive specimens.

In this study, we examined the detection rate of C. acnes for the following open shoulder surgery procedures: open cuff repair, reverse total shoulder replacement, and ORIF for intra-articular fractures. Some studies have suggested that C. acnes is associated with postoperative hydrarthrosis and subacromial bursitis in rotator cuff repair.11,13C. acnes has been reported to cause postoperative pain and implant loosening in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.14,15 To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on the relationship between C. acnes and ORIF for fractures.

The route of transmission for C. acnes remains largely unclear. In this study, C. acnes-positive cases detected from skin swab cultures were also significantly detected from synovial swabs, thus suggesting contamination from the skin. In addition, C. acnes was detected in synovial swab cultures immediately after the surgical exposure of the joint, and the detection rate did not increase in synovial swabs before the surgical closure of the joint; thus, we believe that the contamination had occurred prior to or at an early stage of surgery. Levy et al6 also described the potential preoperative presence of C. acnes, as they detected C. acnes in synovial fluid and tissues before implantation during total shoulder replacement. Moreover, Kajita et al16 and Mook et al15 reported that pre-operative injections can increase the detection rate of C. acnes in shoulder surgery. C. acnes does not reside in the surface of the skin but in the sebaceous glands of the subcutaneous layer, and it is difficult to completely eliminate the bacteria by skin disinfection. Sethi et al17 reported a C. acnes detection rate of 15.8% in skin swab cultures after skin disinfection. Falconer et al10 reported that C. acnes was found in swab cultures of surgical gloves and implants used during the operation, pointing out the possibility of intraoperative contamination. It is advisable to replace scalpel blades and gloves frequently to prevent C. acnes contamination. Although the scalpel blade used for skin incision and gloves used during surgery were replaced frequently, a complete prevention of C. acnes contamination would be difficult to achieve. Stull et al18 stated that the addition of 3% hydrogen peroxide to normal disinfection can significantly reduce the detection of C. acnes in the skin. Scheer et al19 stated that the use of benzoyl peroxide for disinfection can significantly reduce the detection of C. acnes. Future studies should explore the implementation of more effective methods for skin disinfection against C. acnes and reduction of contact with the subcutaneous tissue where C. acnes may be present in order to avoid the risk of intraoperative contamination.

None of the C. acnes-positive cases from synovial swab cultures in this study resulted in deep infection within 2 years after surgery. Although several subtypes of C. acnes have been described in the literature, only a small number of these have been shown to exhibit virulence and cause deep-seated infections.5 The particular C. acnes detected in this present study may have been subtypes that exhibit low virulence. Deep infections caused by C. acnes are called “stealth”-type infections and do not commonly present with clinical findings such as swelling, hot sensation, and pain as observed in other common forms of deep infections.20,21 Since this study described a short-term observation after surgery, future studies should aim to investigate the long-term follow-up of deep infection in C. acnes-positive cases.

There were several limitations in this study. Firstly, the sample size was small. Secondly, the follow-up period was short. Thirdly, several subtypes of C. acnes have been identified that may explain their bacterial diversity and clinical manifestation5; however, these variations were not considered in this study. Lastly, surgical indications were varied. Future studies should address these concerns with a larger study population, longer follow-up period, and consistency in terms of surgical indication.

CONCLUSION

A high detection rate of C. acnes was observed in male skin for open shoulder surgery. In cases where C. acnes was detected from the skin, the bacteria was also significantly detected from synovial swabs, which suggests the route of infection may be via contamination.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No specific grant from funding agencies in the public, private, or not-for-profit sectors were received in this study.

Abbreviations

C. acnes

Cutibacterium acnes

ORIF

open reduction and internal fixation

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chuang MJ, Jancosko JJ, Mendoza V, Nottage WM. The incidence of Propionibacterium acnes in shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(9):1702–1707. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Pottinger P, Butler-Wu S, Neradilek MB, et al. Prognostic factors for bacterial cultures positive for propionibacterium acnes and other organisms in a large series of revision shoulder arthroplasties performed for stiffness, pain, or loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(22):2075–2083. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00861. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Ahsan ZS, Somerson JS, Matsen FA 3rd. Characterizing the Propionibacterium load in revision shoulder arthroplasty: a study of 137 culture-positive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(2):150–154. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00422. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4.Buchalter DB, Mahure SA, Mollon B, Yu S, Kwon YW, Zuckerman JD. Two-stage revision for infected shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(6):939–947. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.056. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Hsu JE, Bumgarner RE, Matsen FA 3rd. Propionibacterium in shoulder arthroplasty: what we think we know today. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(7):597–606. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00568. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Levy O, Iyer S, Atoun E, et al. Propionibacterium acnes: an underestimated etiology in pathogenesis of osteoarthritis? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(4):505–511. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Shields MV, Abdullah L, Namdari S. The challenge of Propionibacterium acnes and revision shoulder arthroplasty: a review of current diagnostic options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(6):1034–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Shields MV, Abdullah L, Namdari S. The challenge of Propionibacterium acnes and revision shoulder arthroplasty: a review of current diagnostic options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(6):1034–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Pauzenberger L, Grieb A, Hexel M, Laky B, Anderl W, Heuberer P. Infections following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(2):595–601. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4202-2. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Falconer TM, Baba M, Kruse LM, et al. Contamination of the surgical field with propionibacterium acnes in primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(20):1722–1728. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01133. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Kajita Y, Iwahori Y, Harada Y, Deie M. Incidence of Propionibacterium acnes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Orthop Sci. 2020;25(1):110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Patel A, Calfee RP, Plante M, Fischer SA, Green A. Propionibacterium acnes colonization of human shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(6):897–902. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Athwal GS, Sperling JW, Rispoli DM, Cofield RH. Deep infection after rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(3):306–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.MacNiven I, Hsu JE, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA 3rd. Preoperative Skin-Surface Cultures Can Help to Predict the Presence of Propionibacterium in Shoulder Arthroplasty Wounds. JBJS Open Access. 2018;3(1):e0052. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Mook WR, Klement MR, Green CL, Hazen KC, Garrigues GE. The incidence of Propionibacterium acnes in open shoulder surgery: a controlled diagnostic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(12):957–963. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00784. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Kajita Y, Iwahori Y, Harada Y, Deie M, Takahashi R. Detection of Cutibacterium acnes in arthroscopic rotator cuff and bankart repair. J Orthop Sci. 2020;25(5):825–829. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Sethi PM, Sabetta JR, Stuek SJ, et al. Presence of Propionibacterium acnes in primary shoulder arthroscopy: results of aspiration and tissue cultures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(5):796–803. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.042. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Stull JD, Nicholson TA, Davis DE, Namdari S. Addition of 3% hydrogen peroxide to standard skin preparation reduces Cutibacterium acnes-positive culture rate in shoulder surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(2):212–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Scheer VM, Bergman Jungeström M, Lerm M, Serrander L, Kalén A.Topical benzoyl peroxide application on the shoulder reduces Propionibacterium acnes: a randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(6):957–961. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20.Lomholt HB, Kilian M. Population genetic analysis of Propionibacterium acnes identifies a subpopulation and epidemic clones associated with acne. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.Crane JK, Hohman DW, Nodzo SR, Duquin TR. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes isolates from shoulder surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(7):3424–3426. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00463-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Nagoya Journal of Medical Science are provided here courtesy of Nagoya University School of Medicine/Graduate School of Medicine

RESOURCES