Overview
A kidney biopsy is performed for a treatment strategy of renal disease by pathologically diagnosing renal disease. Kidney biopsy is a reliable gold standard technique, but various complications are common when obtaining tissue from an abundant vascular kidney. During a biopsy, vasovagal reflexes, including cold sweat, discomfort, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia, can occur. Hemorrhagic complications after a biopsy are important; 89% of hemorrhagic complications have been reported to occur within 24 h. Therefore, a cooperation system including nurses and physicians by performing intravenous feeding and medication, while performing electrocardiogram monitoring and oxygen saturation monitoring, is necessary.
Therefore, it is necessary to always take the benefits and risks of kidney biopsy into consideration and decide if there is an indication for kidney biopsy.
The conventional criteria for the indication of kidney biopsy for adults are shown in Table 1, according to previous reports [1–3]. However, there is an opinion that it is necessary to extend these indications [3]. The following opinions were sent by a member of the Japanese Society of Nephrology.
There is an indication for kidney biopsy beyond the above indication. The indication must be considered in every case. It is important that it does not limit the experience-rich institutional practice.
Nephrologists, including young doctors with little experience in kidney biopsy, should recognize the safety procedures that are necessary to prevent the threshold to high-risk clinical conditions from lowering.
Cases of serious complications such as bleeding can happen, and the appropriate security guidelines for treatment should be prepared before a kidney biopsy.
Table 1.
The conventional criteria for the indication of the kidney biopsy for adults
| 1. Glomerular hematuria with any degree of proteinuria |
| 2. Isolated proteinuria > 1 g/day(or g/gCr) |
| 3. Unexplained renal disease or intrinsic acute kidney injury |
| 4. Renal manifestation related to systemic disease |
The clinical treatment of renal disease is possible without performing a kidney biopsy. However, many nephrologists should note that a higher-quality clinical treatment is enabled by performing kidney biopsy.
The final decision of whether you perform kidney biopsy should be decided based on each institution’s guidelines and should be judged for every individual patient carefully. With respect to the decision, it is necessary to be performed based on the concept of “shared decision making: SDM,” after each attending physician explains the need and the risk of kidney biopsy to each patient thoroughly. We have provided explanations in the ‘Kidney biopsy guidebook 2020 in Japan’ along with questions and answers based on the results of a questionnaire survey for kidney biopsy that was performed in Japan from 2015 through 2017 by the Committee of Practical Guide for Kidney biopsy [4, 5], while adding the outline of the first edition of 2004 [1].
Chapter 1: Indication for kidney biopsy (Table 2)
Table 2.
Indication of kidney biopsy in adults
| 1. Isolated glomerular hematuria |
| 2. Isolated proteinuria |
| 3. Proteinuria and glomerular hematuria |
| 4. Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis |
| 5. Intrinsic acute kidney injury |
| 6. Systemic disease with a urinalysis abnormality |
| 7. Systemic disease with renal dysfunction, and/or without urinalysis abnormality |
| 8. Diabetes mellitus |
| 9. Elderly renal disease |
| 10. Hereditary renal disease |
| 11. Repeated kidney biopsy |







Systemic disease with renal dysfunction, but without a urinalysis abnormality, includes acute or chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis secondary to sarcoidosis, drug-related disease such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors. IgG4-related nephritis, or hypercalcemic nephropathy by activated cholecalciferol. A high value of tubular impairment markers such as β2-microglobulin (β2MG), α1-microglobulin (α1MG), or N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (NAG) is characteristic.
Systemic lupus erythematosus without urinary abnormality is called silent lupus nephritis. Light microscopy of kidney biopsy is reported to show mild glomerular change with class I or class II on 74% of silent lupus nephritis according to ISN-RPS lupus nephritis classification, but immunofluorescent microscopy shows IgG and C1q stain, and electron microscopy shows electron-dense deposits in the mesangium or subepithelium, which are characteristic to lupus nephritis.
Systemic vasculitis, including MPA, GPA and EGPA, can be diagnosed by extrarenal complications such as fever, upper respiratory tract disease, lung disease, neuropathy, and positivity for ANCA, even though urinary abnormality is negative. For these patients, kidney biopsy is reported to show crescent formation or vasculitis of small arteries with a frequency of 69%, although extrarenal organ biopsy may not show any vasculitis [26–29].




Chapter 2: Kidney biopsy for patients with a clinical condition of high risk for percutaneous native kidney biopsy
Overview
The following renal disease was contraindicated for percutaneous native kidney biopsy under the ultrasonic guidance in the previous edition of the guidebook because the risk of hemorrhagic complications after a kidney biopsy is very high, and renal tissue sampling necessary for diagnosis is not obtained [1] (Table 3). However, as biopsy techniques, by using a newer US device and automatic biopsy needle, improved safety, there have been several reported case series that required or enabled histological diagnosis by kidney biopsy [4]. Therefore, when the benefit is judged to exceed a risk, kidney biopsy is indicated for patients with a clinical condition of high risk. A kidney biopsy should be performed in institutions that can treat hemorrhagic complications. The following diseases are not absolute contraindicated anymore but are described as a renal disease with high risk by a question and answer method.
Table 3.
Clinical condition of the high risk (equaling relative contraindication) for percutaneous native kidney biopsy under ultrasonic guidance
| 1. Solitary native kidney |
| 2. Contracted kidneys, small hyperechoic kidneys or end-stage kidneys |
| 3. Kidneys of anatomic abnormalities including horseshoe kidney, malrotation kidney and renal arterial aneurysm |
| 4. Polycystic kidney disease |
| 5. Hydronephrosis |
| 6. Malignant nephrosclerosis related to hypertensive emergency and scleroderma renal crisis |
| 7. Uncontrolled bleeding diathesis or severe thrombocytopenia |
| 8. Pregnancy |
| 9. Severe obesity |
| 10. Renal mass including malignant neoplasma |
| 11. Chronic anticoagulant therapy while taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication |
| 12. Active renal or perirenal infection, or skin infection over the biopsy site |
| 13. Inability to provide informed consent |
| 14. Uncooperative patient or inability to follow instructions during biopsy |













For patients on chronic anticoagulation, kidney biopsy usually cannot be selected.
Whether kidney biopsy is essential or necessary for diagnosis, prognosis, and/or management must be discussed in the conference conducted at the institute.
If anticoagulation is temporarily stopped (e.g., mechanical heart valves), the risk of thrombosis must be judged in consideration of an individual situation, often in consultation with hematology and cardiology.
If anticoagulation is continued, the risk for bleeding after kidney biopsy must be evaluated in consideration of an individual situation. Kidney biopsy should be performed in an institution with the facilities for emergency treatment [123–125] (Table 4).

Table 4.
Chronic anticoagulation and drug holiday before kidney biopsy including two types of options in Japan
| Drug | Drug holiday |
|---|---|
| Antiplatelet medication | |
| Ticlopidine | ① 5–7 days, ② 10–14 days |
| Clopidogrel | ① 5–7 days, ② 14 days |
| Cilostazol | ① 1 day, ② 2–4 days |
| Icosapentaenoic acid | 7–10 days |
| Beraprost | 2–3 days |
| Sarpogrelate | 1–2 days |
| Aspirin | ① 3 days, ② 7–10 days |
| Dipyridamole | 1–2 days |
| Prasugrel | ① 5–7 days, ② 14 days |
| Anticoagulant medication | |
| Heparin | 1 day |
| Dalteparin | 1 day |
| Warfarin | 3–5 days (intravenous heparin) |
| Dabigatran | 1–4 days |
| Edoxaban | 1 day |
| Rivaroxaban | 1 day |
| Apixaban | 1–2 days (intravenous heparin) |
| Vasodilator | |
| Limaprost | 1 day |
| Coronary vasodilator | |
| Dilazep hydrochloride | 1 day |




Chapter 3: Informed consent and explanation document to the patients
Informed consent in kidney biopsy
Overview
Kidney biopsy is a gold standard for renal disease diagnosis and is the testing that we cannot miss in renal disease practice. However, it is invasive testing, and adequate informed consent is necessary. With respect to the nephrologist, it is necessary to explain the possible complications by the testing procedures, including hemorrhagic complications, in addition to the benefits of kidney biopsy to the patients. With respect to the patients, it is important to consent to kidney biopsy based on their own intention after having understood the benefits (merits) and disadvantages (demerits) of kidney biopsy explained by a physician [126].
In Japan, informed consent is obtained before kidney biopsy, and kidney biopsy is performed after, as a general rule, having acquired an agreement by letter. In this issue, the informed consent is commented by a question and answer method.





Explanation document to the patients

We take some kidney tissue by using the needle with the core size of the ball-point pen, observe it with a microscope, and clarify a cause of renal disease occurring in kidney. If a cause of the illness is understood, we can suggest an optimal therapy. A procedure or an operation to take out kidney tissue is named kidney biopsy.




We put an indwelling needle for intravenous feeding in the blood vessel of the arm before testing. An antimicrobial agent and/or hemostatic are usually given before testing. When BP falls or you came to feel sick during testing, a drug is given through an indwelling needle.
We cancel your diet before the testing. This is because you come to feel sick, and you may vomit by the pressure from a back hemostasis.
There is the kidney at the position near a back. You lie on your face and the stomach. A renal place is confirmed by US. From the skin of the back surface to the renal surface, a local anesthetic is injected in place to prick with a needle. We cut about a 2–3 mm opening in the skin surface. This section may remain as a minimal wound subsequently.
The thickness of the needle taking the renal tissue is a core size of the ball-point pen, and the length is around 2 cm. When a needle is inserted, there is no pain, but there is the sense that the back is pushed. When the needle reaches the kidney, we signal you. Please hold your breath for 5-10 s. We take the renal tissue at that moment. You hear a clicking sound at the moment that we take the renal tissue. Because there is no pain, do not worry. We conduct this operation 2–4 times.
When kidney biopsy is completed, we exert pressure from the back for 10–15 min to stop bleeding.
The testing is completed in approximately 30 min. After testing, you turn over on your back. Rest is required in a bed for 6–24 h. Eating and drinking after the testing is performed lying down. Urination and the defecation are carried out on the bed, too. When urination is difficult, we may use a tube called a urethral catheter. After testing, fever may occur. The cause is considered absorption fever occurring when the hematoma that occurred after a biopsy is absorbed.
For 4 weeks from the next morning, walking is possible, but please avoid running up the stairs, and please avoid intense, laborious work to avoid exerting stress on the area that was affected by the procedure.
With respect to the method of kidney biopsy performed in Japan, an automatic biopsy needle is now used under the ultrasonic guidance in almost all institutions. Kidney biopsy is considerably safer than when performed blindly, and it may be said that it is an established testing method. However, when it may be hard to obtain renal tissue, we may cancel testing on the way without overdoing it. When we cannot obtain renal tissue, or when glomeruli necessary for a diagnosis are not included, we may make a testing plan again.

There is a "laparoscopic kidney biopsy," which takes the renal tissue while confirming the kidney using laparoscopy as other methods directly (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

How to do a kidney biopsy
When there is the high-risk clinical condition and hemorrhagic complications by percutaneous kidney biopsy, when renal tissue is not gained by percutaneous kidney biopsy, "opening kidney biopsy" or "laparoscopic kidney biopsy" is chosen.

By light microscopy, we can observe the whole, including glomeruli, renal tubules, and the blood vessels, and can obtain basic information.
By fluorescent microscopy, we observe the presence or absence of deposition and a deposition place of immunoglobulin, including IgG, IgA, and IgM, and complements, such as C3 and C1q.
By electron microscopy, we confirm the cellular internal structure, including glomerular and tubular structure, and a deposit causing nephritis, which spreads approximately 15,000 times.
After performing three tests, a diagnosis of renal disease is made.
According to questionnaire survey by the Japanese Society of Nephrology for kidney biopsy that was performed in Japan from 2015 through 2017, out of 15,657 adult patients who underwent kidney biopsy by a nephrologist, transfusion was required in 121 cases (0.8%), hemostasis treatment by renal artery embolization in 31 cases (0.2%), gross hematuria with no treatment in 431 cases (2.8%), vesicoclysis in 56 cases (0.4%), death in one (0.006%). Close evaluation of the death cases clarified that bleeding after kidney biopsy is not a direct cause, but the overall status of these cases was poor before kidney biopsy and worsened after kidney biopsy.
Chapter 4: Pre-biopsy evaluation

- Medical history
-
①Detailed history of present illness.
-
②Family history of renal diseases.
-
③Past medical and social history.
-
④History of patient medication.
-
①
Physical examination
Blood test
-
①
Complete blood cell count
Erythrocyte transfusion is considered for severe anemia before kidney biopsy. The cutoff value of Hb is 7–8 g/dL. Platelet transfusion is considered for severe thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 50,000/μL.
-
②
Coagulation study
Tests for prothrombin time (PT), APTT, fibrinogen, and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) (or D-dimer) are recommended for pre-operative screening. When a coagulation abnormality is found, close examination and adequate treatment are required before kidney biopsy. When a thrombotic tendency is pointed out, especially in high-risk patients with nephrotic syndrome, screening tests for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are also considered.
-
③
Biochemistry
Serum tests include total protein, albumin, urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid, AST, ALT, LDH, and electrolytes (Na, K, Cl, Ca, P, and Mg). Estimated GFR by using serum creatinine or cysteine C values are important to evaluate renal function. Arterial blood gas analysis (including anion gap) is also helpful for the differential diagnosis of kidney diseases with acid–base abnormality.
-
④
Blood sugar (glucose) test
As well as fasting plasma glucose (sugar), HbA1C and glycoalbumin are useful for evaluation of hyperglycemic conditions.
-
⑤
Immunology
Immunological tests include immunoglobulin (IgG, IgA, IgM, IgG4), complement (CH50, C3, C4), autoantibody (antinuclear antibody, ds-DNA, SM, RNP, ANCA, GBM, anticardiolipin, lupus anticoagulant), serum monoclonal protein.
-
⑥
Endocrinology
Endocrinological examinations include renin, aldosterone, and BNP.
-
⑦
Tests for infection
HBV, HCV, syphilis (RPR/TPHA), and HIV are screened.
-
4.Urinalysis
-
①Urinary qualitative test (dipstick test).
-
②Urinary sediment.Dysmorphic erythrocytes suggest hematuria with glomerular diseases.
-
③Urinary quantitative test.Urinary protein is measured by using spot urine or 24-h collected urine. NAG, β2MG, and α1MG are useful markers for tubular dysfunction. Selectivity index (SI) is also helpful in the differential diagnosis of nephrotic proteinuria.
-
①
-
5.
Imaging test
Diagnostic imaging includes US, CT, and MRI. Radioisotope examinations are also useful for understanding renal pathophysiology. 99mTc-MAG3, an isotope secreting from proximal tubules, is utilized for evaluating effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) of right and left kidneys. 99mTc-DTPA, an isotope filtrating from glomeruli, is used for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of right and left kidneys.

Chapter 5. Method of kidney biopsy (technique)




Setting the patient in lateral jack-knife position, through 3 cm of horizontal incision from 12 rib tip the muscles are divided in each layer to reach the inferior pole of the kidney covered by adipose tissue. Confirming not to damage the peritoneum, the circumrenal fat and Gerota fascia are cut to reach the surface of kidney. The biopsy gun for needle biopsy on the kidney or the wedge incision for block type specimen is used to take a piece of the kidney. After biopsy, hemostasis is securely performed by pressure with the forefinger for 10–15 min. The muscles and skin are closed in layers to finish the procedure. [144, 145].


Because hemostasis pressure can be provided surely as compared with a native kidney biopsy, it is not necessary to discontinue the anticoagulant therapy. However, it is desirable to conduct an examination for coagulation system in advance.
Under local anesthesia the biopsy needle is put into the kidney to take a piece of the kidney. This may be performed 2–3 times to obtain an adequate specimen.
Just after the procedure, the physician presses the puncture area for 10–15 min for hemostasis. After that A 1 kg sandbag is put on the puncture area to maintain pressure for an hour. A small pillow is fixed with elastic tape on the area. Thereafter the patient must lie in bed for 6 h or until seen by the doctor. The patient must pay attention for blood in their urine after the biopsy.
The fixing elastic tape will be removed on next morning. Before discharge a blood count, biochemistry test, and urinalysis are examined. The discharge is permitted after having confirmed that there is no hematoma and hydronephrosis around the renal graft by US [147–149].
Chapter 6: After care of the biopsy and post procedure observation
Aftercare of the biopsy and postprocedure observation are essential to prevent hemorrhagic complications. After biopsy, bed rest for 6–8 h in an extraneous dressing room is mandated in Europe and America. In Japan, kidney biopsy is performed during hospitalization. Just after the biopsy is performed, pressure is exerted on the back by using both hands and a sandbag for hemostasis. Subsequently, bed rest in the dorsal (supine) position is common [98, 150–160].







Chapter 7: Complications
According to the questionnaire survey results that were performed for the publication of this book, among 21,648 kidney biopsy cases that were performed in Japan, gross hematuria after kidney biopsy was found in 511 patients (2.4%), bladder wash was in 79 cases (0.36%), red blood cell transfusion was in 161 cases (0.74%), renal arterial embolization was in 44 cases (0.22%), and death occurred in one case (0.005%). The underlying cause of death in this case was not due to bleeding after kidney biopsy, but the overall status of this case was confirmed poor before kidney biopsy and worsened after kidney biopsy (Table 5) [1, 4, 5, 66, 74, 156, 169–174].

Table 5.
Bleeding complications after kidney biopsy
| Percutaneous native kidney biopsy | Percutaneous native kidney biopsy | Open biopsy | Transplanted kidney biopsy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult | Children | |||
| Total number of biopsies | 15,657 | 1685 | 1156 | 3808 |
| Macroscopic hematuria with no treatment | 431 (2.8%) | 105 (6.2%) | 9 (0.78%) | 12 (0.31%) |
| Erythrocyte transfusion | 121 (0.8%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (0.35%) | 2 (0.05%) |
| Transcatheter arterial embolization | 31 (0.2%) | 1 (0.06%) | 2 (0.17%) | 4 (0.1%) |
| Bladder lavage | 56 (0.4%) | 9 (0.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Nephrectomy | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 1 (0.03%) |
Results from questionnaire survey for kidney biopsy that was performed in Japan from 2015 through 2017







Chapter 8: Histological evaluation of kidney biopsy specimen
Kidney biopsy remains the gold standard to diagnose renal disease and evaluate acute and chronic renal damages. Specimens are processed for the diagnostic approach of light microscopy (LM), immunostaining by immunofluorescence (IF) or immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy (EM). To minimize the bleeding risk, less passes to obtain tissue is desirable; on the other hand, sufficient quantity of tissue is required for definite diagnosis. When small sample size of renal tissues was obtained, dividing samples appropriately into LM, IF, and EM studies should be carefully considered (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

How to divide a sample of the kidney biopsy






Chapter 9: Kidney biopsy in children
Kidney biopsy in the pediatric population was reported for the first time in 1958 and has a history of more than 60 years [204]. The procedure has become relatively safe in children as well as in adults owing to technical advances and improvement of medical devices. However, the indication for kidney biopsy must be carefully determined based on benefits and potential risks for serious bleeding complications.
Indication of kidney biopsy (Table 6)
Table 6.
Indication of kidney biopsy in children
| 1. Abnormal urinalysis | 1. Isolated proteinuria 0.5 g/gCr or more |
| 2. Proteinuria and glomerular hematuria | |
| 2. Nephrotic syndrome | 1. Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome |
| 2. Coexistence of hematuria, hypertension, renal dysfunction, and hypocomplementemia | |
| 3. Congenital nephrotic syndrome | |
| 3. Systemic disease with a urinalysis abnormality | 1. Systemic lupus erythematosus |
| 2. IgA vasculitis (Purpura nephritis) | |
| 3. Microscopic polyangiitis | |
| 4. Others | |
| 4. Intrinsic acute kidney injury | |
| 5. Others | 1. Drug-related disease |
| 2. Transplanted kidney |






Kidney biopsy for clinical condition with high risk
Kidney biopsy is indicated according to adult criteria [214].
Pre-biopsy evaluation
We may need sedation or general anesthesia in children. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the airway and the overall status (underlying disease) beforehand.



Informed consent for kidney biopsy, explanation about kidney biopsy



Method of kidney biopsy (technique)



Sedation





Ketamine (Ketalar) (initial dose, 1–2 mg/kg): duration of action is 5–10 min.
Midazolam (Dormicum) (initial dose, 0.05–0.1 mg/kg): half-life in blood is 0.8–1.8 h.
Pentazocine (Sosegon) (initial dose, 0.5–1.5 mg/kg): half-life in blood is 3–4 h
Thiopental (Ravonal), Thiamylal (Isozol) (initial dose, 4–6 mg/kg): duration of action is ten minutes.
Propofol (Diprivan) (initial dose, infants 3–5 mg/kg, older children 2.5–3 mg/kg): duration of action is 5–15 min.
After care of the biopsy and post procedure observation





Complications

Chapter 10: Biopsy of transplanted kidney
For the long-term engraftment after the renal transplant, early detection and early treatment for rejection or early detection of the side effect with the immunosuppressive drug are important. Because treatment totally varies according to clinical condition, the pathological evaluation of the renal graft tissue is important in treatment strategy decision. These clinical conditions occur asymptomatically and may progress.

Episode biopsy: Transplant kidney biopsy is generally performed when an acute renal allograft rejection is suspected within a year after operation. The main clinical indicator is an increase in serum creatinine levels of 20% above a baseline value. Furthermore, a year after operation, for patients with renal dysfunction or proteinuria, the following diseases are clarified by kidney biopsy; chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), chronic rejection (antibody-mediated rejection and T cell-mediated rejection), recurrence of underlying disease and calcineurin inhibitors nephrotoxicity [76, 149, 249].
Protocol biopsy: kidney biopsy is performed at the renal transplant surgery for 0 h (just after perfusion of the isolated kidney), an hour (after renal graft blood flow resumption), at post transplantation 2–3 months, and at a year after. Whether immunosuppressive therapy is appropriate, asymptomatic acute rejection occurs, or underlying disease recurs can be determined.


Chapter 11: Open (surgical) kidney biopsy and laparoscopic kidney biopsy

Surgeons directly look at the surface of the kidneys and determine the area from which the tissue samples should be taken. There are two type of methods including a needle biopsy and wedge biopsy. The incidence of severe bleeding of renal surface is very low, and mortality is rare, but the risk of hemorrhage into the urinary tract exists. Attention is necessary for the development of renal arteriovenous fistula (arteriovenous fistula: AVF) causing bleeding to the urinary tract. Other relatively minor postoperative complications including fever, atelectasis, and ileus can occur. In addition, an open biopsy under general anesthesia is associated with a longer hospital stay and a larger surgical scar. On wedge biopsy, the specimens may increase the proportion of shallow layer of the cortex resulting in less information of the cortex deep part and medulla [4].


As for the complications peculiar to laparoscopic kidney biopsy, nephric subcapsular hematoma, subcutaneous emphysema, peritoneal injury, and injury of the circumference organ are reported.
An advantage of laparoscopic kidney biopsy in comparison with the percutaneous kidney biopsy includes certain sampling of renal tissue as well as confirmation and hemostasis of a bleeding point.
An advantage of laparoscopic kidney biopsy in comparison to open kidney biopsy includes shortening of the hospital stay, pain reduction, and compatibility of the incised wound [4].
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by the Japanese Society of Nephrology. The authors would like to thank Naoki Kashihara (President of the Japanese Society of Nephrology), and the members of the Japanese Society of Nephrology.
Abbreviations
- APTT
Activated partial thromboplastin time
- ANCA
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody
- BP
Blood pressure
- CKD
Chronic kidney disease
- CT
Computed tomography
- DKD
Diabetic kidney disease
- ds-DNA
Double-stranded DNA antibodies
- DM
Diabetes mellitus
- EM
Electron microscopy
- EGPA
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
- EB virus
Epstein–Barr virus
- EBER
Epstein–Barr virus-encoded small RNA
- FDP
Fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products
- FSGS
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis
- GBM
Glomerular basement membrane
- GPA
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis
- HBV
Hepatitis B virus
- HCV
Hepatitis C virus
- HUS
Hemolytic-uremic syndrome
- HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
- IF
Immunofluorescence microscopy
- ISH
In situ hybridization
- LM
Light microscopy
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MPA
Microscopic polyangiitis
- MN
Membranous nephropathy
- MCNS
Minimal change nephrotic syndrome
- NAG
N-Acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase
- PT
Prothrombin time
- PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
- RNP
Anti ribonucleoprotein antibody
- SI
Selectivity index
- SM
Anti-Smith (anti-Sm) antibody
- SLE
Systemic lupus erythematosus
- TMA
Thrombotic microangiopathy
- TTP
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
- TAFRO
Thrombocytopenia, anasarca, myelofibrosis, renal dysfunction, and organomegaly
- US
Ultrasonography
- α1MG
α1-Microglobulin
- β2MG
β2-Microglobulin
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No authors have declared any competing interest about the contribution of this article. All the authors have declared no conflict of interest exists.
Footnotes
In 2020, Japanese Society of Nephrology established Committee of Practical Guide for Kidney Biopsy 2020, which published in (Jinseiken guidebook, 2020, vol. 2, page 1–180). This is the English version of that report.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
8/9/2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1007/s10157-021-02120-w
References
- 1.Japanese Society of Nephrology . Guidebook of the kidney biopsy. Tokyo: Tokyo-Igakusha; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Salama AD, Cook HT. The kidney biopsy. In: Skorecki K, Chertow GM, Marsden PA, Taal MW, Yu AS, editors. Brenner & Rector's The Kidney. 10. New York: Elsevier; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dhaun N, Bellamy CO, Cattran DC, Kluth DC. Utility of kidney biopsy in the clinical management of renal disease. Kidney Int. 2014;85:1039–1048. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kawaguchi T, Nagasawsa T, Tsuruya K, Miura K, Katsuno T, Morikawa T, Ishikawa E, Ogura M, Matsumura H, Kurayama R, Matsumoto S, Marui Y, Hara S, Maruyama S, Narita I, Okada H, Ubara Y, Committee of Practical Guide for Kidney Biopsy 2019 Correction to: A nationwide survey on clinical practice patterns and bleeding complications of percutaneous native kidney biopsy in Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020;24(5):389–401. doi: 10.1007/s10157-020-01869-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kawaguchi T, Nagasawsa T, Tsuruya K, Miura K, Katsuno T, Morikawa T, Ishikawa E, Ogura M, Matsumura H, Kurayama R, Matsumoto S, Marui Y, Hara S, Maruyama S, Narita I, Okada H, Ubara Y, Committee of Practical Guide for Kidney Biopsy 2019 A nationwide survey on clinical practice patterns and bleeding complications of percutaneous native kidney biopsy in Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020;24(5):402–403. doi: 10.1007/s10157-020-01883-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yamagata K, Takahashi H, Tomida C, Yamagata Y, Koyama A. Prognosis of asymptomatic hematuria and/or proteinuria in men. High prevalence of IgA nephropathy among proteinuric patients found in mass screening. Nephron. 2002;91:34–42. doi: 10.1159/000057602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kawamura T, Ohta T, Ohno Y, Wakai K, Aoki R, Tamakoshi A, Maeda K, Mizuno Y. Significance of urinalysis for subsequent kidney and urinary tract disorders in mass screening of adults. Intern Med. 1995;34:475–480. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.34.475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nieuwhof C, Doorenbos C, Grave W, de Heer F, de Leeuw P, Zeppenfeldt E, van Breda Vriesman PJ. A prospective study of the natural history of idiopathic non-proteinuric hematuria. Kidney Int. 1996;49:222–225. doi: 10.1038/ki.1996.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vivante A, Afek A, Frenkel-Nir Y, Tzur D, Farfel A, Golan E, Chaiter Y, Shohat T, Skorecki K, Calderon-Margalit R. Persistent asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria in Israeli adolescents and young adults and risk for end-stage renal disease. JAMA. 2011;306:729–736. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Richards NT, Darby S, Howie AJ, Adu D, Michael J. Knowledge of renal histology alters patient management in over 40% of cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9:1255–1259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Iseki K, Ikemiya Y, Iseki C, Takishita S. Proteinuria and the risk of developing end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1468–1474. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00868.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Iseki K, Ikemiya Y, Iseki C, Takishita S. The okinawa screening program. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(7 Suppl 2):S127–130. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000070153.91733.09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Berden AE, Ferrario F, Hagen EC, Jayne DR, Jennette JC, Joh K, Neumann I, Noël LH, Pusey CD, Waldherr R, Bruijn JA, Bajema IM. Histopathologic classification of ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:1628–1636. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010050477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Muso E, Endo T, Itabashi M, Kakita H, Iwasaki Y, Tateishi Y, Komiya T, Ihara T, Yumura W, Sugiyama T, Joh K, Suzuki K. Evaluation of the newly proposed simplified histological classification in Japanese cohorts of myelo-peroxidase-anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulonephritis in comparison with other Asian and European cohorts. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2013;17:659–662. doi: 10.1007/s10157-012-0755-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Berden AE, Jones RB, Erasmus DD, Walsh M, Noël LH, Ferrario F, Waldherr R, Bruijn JA, Jayne DR, Bajema IM, European Vasculitis Society Tubular lesions predict renal outcome in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulo-nephritis after rituximab therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:313–321. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011040330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Merkel F, Pullig O, Marx M, Netzer KO, Weber M. Course and prognosis of anti-basement membrane antibody (anti-BM-Ab)-mediated disease: report of 35 cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9:372–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Levy JB, Turner AN, Rees AJ, Pusey CD. Long-term outcome of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody disease treated with plasma exchange and immunosuppression. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:1033–1042. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-11-200106050-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Alchi B, Griffiths M, Sivalingam M, Jayne D, Farrington K. Predictors of renal and patient outcomes in anti-GBM disease: clinicopathologic analysis of a two-centre cohort. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:814–821. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kellum JA, Lameire N, KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1) Crit Care. 2013;17:204. doi: 10.1186/cc11454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Palevsky PM, Zhang JH, O'Connor TZ, Chertow GM, Crowley ST, Choudhury D, Finkel K, Kellum JA, Paganini E, Schein RM, Smith MW, Swanson KM, Thompson BT, Vijayan A, Watnick S, Star RA, Peduzzi P. Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury". N Engl J Med. 2008;359:7–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Weening JJ, D'Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, Balow JE, Bruijn JA, Cook T, Ferrario F, Fogo AB, Ginzler EM, Hebert L, Hill G, Hill P, Jennette JC, Kong NC, Lesavre P, Lockshin M, Looi LM, Makino H, Moura LA, Nagata M, International Society of Nephrology Working Group on the Classification of Lupus Nephritis The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:241–250. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000108969.21691.5D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Parikh SV, Rovin BH. Current and emerging therapies for lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:2929–2939. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016040415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Almaani S, Meara A, Rovin BH. Update on lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12:825–835. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05780616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Toriu N, Sawa N, Oguro M, Mizuno H, Oshima Y, Hasegawa E, Sumida K, Suwabe T, Kawada M, Ueno T, Hayami N, Sekine A, Hiramatsu R, Yamanouchi M, Hoshino J, Takaichi K, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Yanagita M, Ubara Y. Renal-limited cryoglobulinemic vasculitis: two case reports. Intern Med. 2018;57(13):1879–1886. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0131-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Endo A, Hoshino J, Suwabe T, Sumida K, Mise K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Sawa N, Takaichi K, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Ubara Y. Significance of small renal artery lesions in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulonephritis. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(6):1140–1146. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mahajan SK, Ordóñez NG, Feitelson PJ, Lim VS, Spargo BH, Katz AI. Lupus nephropathy without clinical renal involvement. Medicine (Baltimore) 1977;56:493–501. doi: 10.1097/00005792-197711000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wada Y, Ito S, Ueno M, Nakano M, Arakawa M, Gejyo F. Renal outcome and predictors of clinical renal involvement in patients with silent lupus nephritis. Nephron Clin Pract. 2004;98:c105–111. doi: 10.1159/000081551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wakasugi D, Gono T, Kawaguchi Y, Hara M, Koseki Y, Katsumata Y, Hanaoka M, Yamanaka H. Frequency of class III and IV nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus without clinical renal involvement: an analysis of predictive measures. J Rheumatol. 2012;39:79–85. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hasegawa J, Hoshino J, Sekine A, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Sumida K, Mise K, Ueno T, Yamanouchi M, Hazue R, Sawa N, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Takaichi K, Ubara Y. Clinical and pathological features of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis in patients with minor urinary abnormalities. Nephrology (Carlton) 2018;23:1007–1012. doi: 10.1111/nep.13157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hoshino J, Furuichi K, Yamanouchi M, Mise K, Sekine A, Kawada M, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Sawa N, Hara S, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Kitagawa K, Toyama T, Shimizu M, Takaichi K, Ubara Y, Wada T. A new pathological scoring system by the Japanese classification to predict renal outcome in diabetic nephropathy. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0190923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Toriu N, Yamanouchi M, Hiramatsu R, Hayami N, Hoshino J, Sekine A, Kawada M, Hasegawa E, Suwabe T, Sumida K, Ueno T, Sawa N, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Takaichi K, Yanagita M, Kobayasi T, Ubara Y. Preservation of renal function by intensive glycemic control. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2018;2018:17-0136. doi: 10.1530/EDM-17-0136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yamanouchi M, Hoshino J, Ubara Y, Takaichi K, Kinowaki K, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Mise K, Toyama T, Hara A, Kitagawa K, Shimizu M, Furuichi K, Wada T. Value of adding the renal pathological score to the kidney failure risk equation in advanced diabetic nephropathy. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0190930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Furuichi K, Shimizu M, Yuzawa Y, Hara A, Toyama T, Kitamura H, Suzuki Y, Sato H, Uesugi N, Ubara Y, Hohino J, Hisano S, Ueda Y, Nishi S, Yokoyama H, Nishino T, Kohagura K, Ogawa D, Mise K, Shibagaki Y, Makino H, Matsuo S, Wada T, Research Group of Diabetic Nephropathy, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development Clinicopathological analysis of biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy based on the Japanese classification of diabetic nephropathy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018;22:570–582. doi: 10.1007/s10157-017-1485-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mise K, Ueno T, Hoshino J, Hazue R, Sumida K, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Sawa N, Fujii T, Hara S, Wada J, Makino H, Takaichi K, Ohashi K, Ubara Y. Nodular lesions in diabetic nephropathy: collagen staining and renal prognosis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;127:187–197. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Furuichi K, Yuzawa Y, Shimizu M, Hara A, Toyama T, Kitamura H, Suzuki Y, Sato H, Uesugi N, Ubara Y, Hisano S, Ueda Y, Nishi S, Yokoyama H, Nishino T, Kohagura K, Ogawa D, Mise K, Shibagaki Y, Kimura K, Haneda M, Makino H, Matsuo S, Wada T. Nationwide multicentre kidney biopsy study of Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018;33:138–148. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hoshino J, Mise K, Ueno T, Imafuku A, Kawada M, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Sawa N, Hara S, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Ubara Y, Takaichi K. A pathological scoring system to predict renal outcome in diabetic nephropathy. Am J Nephrol. 2015;41:337–344. doi: 10.1159/000431333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mise K, Hoshino J, Ueno T, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Sawa N, Fujii T, Hara S, Ohashi K, Takaichi K, Ubara Y. Clinical implications of linear immunofluorescent staining for immunoglobulin G in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106:522–530. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mise K, Hoshino J, Ubara Y, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Sawa N, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Hara S, Takaichi K. Renal prognosis a long time after kidney biopsy on patients with diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:109–118. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mise K, Yamaguchi Y, Hoshino J, Ueno T, Sekine A, Sumida K, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Sawa N, Fujii T, Hara S, Sugiyama H, Makino H, Wada J, Ohashi K, Takaichi K, Ubara Y. Paratubular basement membrane insudative lesions predict renal prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes and biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0183190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mise K, Hoshino J, Ueno T, Hazue R, Hasegawa J, Sekine A, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Sawa N, Fujii T, Hara S, Ohashi K, Takaichi K, Ubara Y. Prognostic value of tubulointerstitial lesions, urinary N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase, and urinary β2-microglobulin in patients with type 2 diabetes and biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:593–601. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04980515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mise K, Hoshino J, Ueno T, Imafuku A, Kawada M, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Sawa N, Fujii T, Hara S, Ohashi K, Takaichi K, Ubara Y. Impact of tubulointerstitial lesions on anaemia in patients with biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy. Diabet Med. 2015;32:546–555. doi: 10.1111/dme.12633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Moriya T, Omura K, Matsubara M, Yoshida Y, Hayama K, Ouchi M. Arteriolar hyalinosis predicts increase in albuminuria and GFR Decline in Normo- and micro-albuminuric japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1373–1378. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mazzucco G, Bertani T, Fortunato M, Bernardi M, Leutner M, Boldorini R, Monga G. Different patterns of renal damage in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicentric study on 393 biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:713–720. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.31988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sharma SG, Bomback AS, Radhakrishnan J, Herlitz LC, Stokes MB, Markowitz GS, D'Agati VD. The modern spectrum of kidney biopsy findings in patients with diabetes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8:1718–1724. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02510213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nair R, Bell JM, Walker PD. Kidney biopsy in patients aged 80 years and older. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44:618–626. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(04)00944-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Omokawa A, Komatsuda A, Nara M, Fujiwara T, Sato R, Togashi M, Okuyama S, Sawada K, Wakui H. Kidney biopsy in patients aged 80 years and older: a single-center experience in Japan. Clin Nephrol. 2012;77:461–467. doi: 10.5414/CN107368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Moutzouris DA, Herlitz L, Appel GB, Markowitz GS, Freudenthal B, Radhakrishnan J, D'Agati VD. Kidney biopsy in the very elderly. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:1073–1082. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00990209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bomback AS, Appel GB, Radhakrishnan J, Shirazian S, Herlitz LC, Stokes B, D'Agati VD, Markowitz GS. ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis in the very elderly. Kidney Int. 2011;79:757–764. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Savige J, Gregory M, Gross O, Kashtan C, Ding J, Flinter F. Expert guidelines for the management of Alport syndrome and thin basement membrane nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(3):364–375. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012020148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Imafuku A, Nozu K, Sawa N, Hasegawa E, Hiramatsu R, Kawada M, Hoshino J, Tanaka K, Ishii Y, Takaichi K, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Iijima K, Ubara Y. Autosomal dominant form of type IV collagen nephropathy exists among patients with hereditary nephritis difficult to diagnose clinicopathologically. Nephrology (Carlton) 2018;23:940–947. doi: 10.1111/nep.13115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Imafuku A, Nozu K, Sawa N, Nakanishi K, Ubara Y. How to resolve confusion in the clinical setting for the diagnosis of heterozygous COL4A3 or COL4A4 gene variants? Discussion and suggestions from nephrologists. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020;24:651–656. doi: 10.1007/s10157-020-01880-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nachman PH. Repeat kidney biopsy for lupus nephritis: an important step forward. Kidney Int. 2018;94:659–661. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.De Rosa M, Azzato F, Toblli JE, De Rosa G, Fuentes F, Nagaraja HN, Nash R, Rovin BH. A prospective observational cohort study highlights kidney biopsy findings of lupus nephritis patients in remission who flare following withdrawal of maintenance therapy. Kidney Int. 2018;94:788–794. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pakozdi A, Pyne D, Sheaff M, Rajakariar R. Utility of a repeat Kidney biopsy in lupus nephritis: a single centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018;33:507–513. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hruskova Z, Honsova E, Berden AE, Rychlik I, Lanska V, Zabka J, Bajema IM, Tesar V. Repeat protocol kidney biopsy in ANCA-associated renal vasculitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:1728–1732. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shima Y, Nakanishi K, Kamei K, Togawa H, Nozu K, Tanaka R, Sasaki S, Iijima K, Yoshikawa N. Disappearance of glomerular IgA deposits in childhood IgA nephropathy showing diffuse mesangial proliferation after 2 years of combination/prednisolone therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:163–169. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shen XH, Liang SS, Chen HM, Le WB, Jiang S, Zeng CH, Zhou ML, Zhang HT, Liu ZH. Reversal of active glomerular lesions after immunosuppressive therapy in patients with IgA nephropathy: a repeat-biopsy based observation. J Nephrol. 2015;28:441–449. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0165-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ahmad H, Tejani A. Predictive value of repeat renal biopsies in children with nephrotic syndrome. Nephron. 2000;84:342–346. doi: 10.1159/000045609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhong Y, Xu F, Li X, Chen H, Liang S, Zhu X, Liu Z, Zeng C. The evolution of morphological variants of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a repeat biopsy-based observation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31:87–95. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ubara Y, Hara S, Katori H, Tagami T, Kitamura A, Yokota M, Matsushita Y, Takemoto F, Yamada A, Nagahama K, Hara M, Chayama K. Splenectomy may improve the glomerulopathy of type II mixed cryoglobulinemia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35:1186–1192. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(00)70057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Iwadate D, Hasegawa E, Hoshino J, Hayami N, Sumida K, Yamanouchi M, Sekine A, Kawada M, Hiramatsu R, Suwabe T, Sawa N, Yuasa M, Wake A, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Takaichi K, Ubara Y. The long-term outcomes after VAD plus SCT therapy in a patient with AL amyloidosis and severe factor X deficiency. Intern Med. 2018;57:701–706. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9263-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ueno T, Kikuchi K, Hazue R, Mise K, Sumida K, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Hoshino J, Sawa N, Arizono K, Hara S, Takaichi K, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Ubara Y. Five sequential evaluations of renal histology in a patient with light chain deposition disease. Intern Med. 2016;55:2993–2999. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.6213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Toriu N, Sawa N, Hiramatsu R, Mizuno H, Ikuma D, Sekine A, Hayami N, Sumida K, Yamanouchi M, Hasegawa E, Hoshino J, Takaichi K, Wake A, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Ubara Y. Regression of renal amyloid deposits by VAD therapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation in a patient with primary AL amyloidosis. CEN Case Rep. 2020;9(1):6–10. doi: 10.1007/s13730-019-00416-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Health and Public Policy Committee American College of Physicians. Clinical competence in percutaneous kidney biopsy. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:301–303. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-2-301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Doyle AJ, Gregory MC, Terreros DA. Percutaneous native kidney biopsy: comparison of a 1.2-mm spring-driven system with a traditional 2-mm hand-driven system. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994;23:498–503. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(12)80370-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hogan JJ, Mocanu M, Berns JS. The native kidney biopsy: update and evidence for best practice. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:354–362. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05750515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fine DM, Arepally A, Hofmann LV, Mankowitz SG, Atta MG. Diagnostic utility and safety of transjugular kidney biopsy in the obese patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:1798–1802. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Margaryan A, Perazella MA, Mahnensmith RL, Abu-Alfa AK. Experience with outpatient computed tomographic-guided kidney biopsy. Clin Nephrol. 2010;74:440–445. doi: 10.5414/CNP74440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mukhtar KN, Mahmood SN, Umair SF. CT guided percutaneous kidney biopsy versus ultrasound guided for obtaining adequate tissue. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62:880–882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.McDougal WS, Tolkoff-Rubin NE, Michaelson MD, Mueller PR, Braaten K. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 28-2006. A 59-year-old man with masses in both kidneys. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1161–1167. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcpc069019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mizunoe S, Yamasaki T, Tokimatsu I, Kushima H, Matsunaga N, Hashinaga K, Miyazaki Y, Komatsu E, Kadota J. Sarcoidosis associated with renal masses on computed tomography. Intern Med. 2006;45:279–282. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ubara Y, Hara S, Katori H, Yamada A, Morii H. Renovascular hypertension may cause nephrotic range proteinuria and focal glomerulosclerosis in contralateral kidney. Clin Nephrol. 1997;48:220–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bandari J, Fuller TW, Turner Ii RM, D'Agostino LA. kidney biopsy for medical renal disease: indications and contraindications. Can J Urol. 2016;23:8121–8126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Corapi KM, Chen JL, Balk EM, Gordon CE. Bleeding complications of native kidney biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;60:62–73. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.02.330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Schow DA, Vinson RK, Morrisseau PM. Percutaneous kidney biopsy of the solitary kidney: a contraindication? J Urol. 1992;147:1235–1237. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37526-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wilczek HE. Percutaneous needle biopsy of the renal allograft. A clinical safety evaluation of 1129 biopsies. Transplantation. 1990;50:790–797. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199011000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Tøndel C, Vikse BE, Bostad L, Svarstad E. Safety and complications of percutaneous kidney biopsies in 715 children and 8573 adults in Norway 1988–2010. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:1591–1597. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02150212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mejía-Vilet JM, Márquez-Martínez MA, Cordova-Sanchez BM, Ibargüengoitia MC, Correa-Rotter R, Morales-Buenrostro LE. Simple risk score for prediction of haemorrhagic complications after a percutaneous kidney biopsy. Nephrology (Carlton) 2018;23:523–529. doi: 10.1111/nep.13055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sumida K, Ubara Y, Marui Y, Nakamura M, Takaichi K, Tomikawa S, Fujii T, Ohashi K. Recurrent proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits of IgG2λ subtype in a trans-planted kidney: a case report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;62:587–590. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Matsunami M, Ubara Y, Sumida K, Oshima Y, Oguro M, Kinoshita K, Tanaka K, Nakamura Y, Kinowaki K, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Igawa T, Sato Y, Ishii Y. The efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal blockade in a renal transplant patient with Castleman disease: early post-transplant outcome. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1065-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Glenn JF. Analysis of 51 patients with horseshoe kidney. N Engl J Med. 1959;261:684–687. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195910012611402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Satav V, Sabale V, Pramanik P, Kanklia SP, Mhaske S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of horseshoe kidney: our institutional experience. Urol Ann. 2018;10:258–262. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_152_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Glodny B, Petersen J, Hofmann KJ, Schenk C, Herwig R, Trieb T, Koppelstaetter C, Steingruber I, Rehder P. Kidney fusion anomalies revisited: clinical and radiological analysis of 209 cases of crossed fused ectopia and horseshoe kidney. BJU Int. 2009;103:224–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07912.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hu P, Jin M, Xie Y, Chen P, Zhang X, Yin Z, Cai G, Chen X. Immunoglobulin A nephropathy in horseshoe kidney: case reports and literature review. Nephrology (Carlton) 2014;19:605–609. doi: 10.1111/nep.12328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Chaabouni Y, Guesmi R, Hentati Y, Kammoun K, Hmida MB, Mnif Z, Boudawara T, Hachicha J. Minimal change disease in horseshoe kidney. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;26:243. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.243.11438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Sumida K, Ubara Y, Hoshino J, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Yamanouchi M, Sawa N, Takaichi K, Ohashi K. Myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated crescentic glomerulonephritis in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ito Y, Sekine A, Takada D, Yabuuchi J, Kogure Y, Ueno T, Sumida K, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Hoshino J, Sawa N, Takaichi K, Kinowaki K, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Kikuchi H, Mandai S, Chiga M, Mori T, Sohara E, Uchida S, Ubara Y. Renal histology and MRI findings in a 37-year-old Japanese patient with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease. Clin Nephrol. 2017;88:292–297. doi: 10.5414/CN109179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Takada D, Sekine A, Yabuuchi J, Kogure Y, Ueno T, Yamanouchi M, Sumida K, Suwabe T, Hayami N, Hoshino J, Takaichi K, Kinowaki K, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Mori T, Sohara E, Uchida S, Ubara Y. Renal histology and MRI in a 25-year-old Japanese man with nephronophthisis 4. Clin Nephrol. 2018;89:223–228. doi: 10.5414/CN109175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hirabayashi Y, Ishikawa E, Ito M. Bilateral renal hilar tumors in IgG4-related disease. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017;21:1131–1132. doi: 10.1007/s10157-017-1403-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Senekjian HO, Stinebaugh BJ, Mattioli CA, Suki WN. Irreversible renal failure following vesicoureteral reflux. JAMA. 1979;241:160–162. doi: 10.1001/jama.1979.03290280040025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Imai T, Yumura W, Takemoto F, Kotoda A, Imai R, Inoue M, Hironaka M, Muto S, Kusano E. A case of IgG4-related tubulointerstitial nephritis with left hydronephrosis after a remission of urinary tract tuberculosis. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:2141–2144. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2271-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Obayashi M, Uzu T, Harada T, Yamato M, Takahara K, Yamauchi A. Two cases of lupus cystitis complicated by lupus nephritis treated successfully with steroid therapy. Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. 2003;45:765–770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Takeuchi Y, Takeuchi E, Kamata K. A possible clue for the production of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody associated with ureteral obstruction and hydronephrosis. Case Rep Nephrol Dial. 2015;5:87–95. doi: 10.1159/000381396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Shibata S, Ubara Y, Sawa N, Tagami T, Hosino J, Yokota M, Katori H, Takemoto F, Hara S, Takaichi K, Fujii A, Murata H, Nishi T. Severe interstitial cystitis associated with Sjögren's syndrome. Intern Med. 2004;43(3):248–252. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.43.248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Nonaka K, Ubara Y, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Hoshino J, Sawa N, Takaichi K, Kuroda Y, Oohashi K. Clinical and pathological evaluation of hypertensive emergency-related nephropathy. Intern Med. 2013;52:45–53. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.52.7398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Takada D, Hoshino J, Kikuchi K, Yabuuchi J, Kogure Y, Ueno T, Sekine A, Yamanouchi M, Sumida K, Mise K, Suwabe T, Hayami N, Sawa N, Takaichi K, Hayasi N, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Ubara Y. Anti-RNA polymerase III antibody-associated scleroderma renal crisis in a patient with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a case report. Mod Rheumatol. 2018;28:369–372. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2015.1112873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Yamanouchi M, Ubara Y, Imafuku A, Kawada M, Koki M, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Hoshino J, Sawa N, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Matsuda M, Takaichi K. Malignant nephrosclerosis in a patient with familial Mediterranean fever. Intern Med. 2015;54:2643–2646. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.4937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Shidham GB, Siddiqi N, Beres JA, Logan B, Nagaraja HN, Shidham SG, Piering WF. Clinical risk factors associated with bleeding after native kidney biopsy. Nephrology (Carlton) 2005;10:305–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2005.00394.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Shima N, Sumida K, Kawada M, Sekine A, Yamanouchi M, Hiramatsu R, Hayami N, Hasegawa E, Suwabe T, Hoshino J, Sawa N, Takaichi K, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Ubara Y. Eltrombopag improves refractory thrombocytopenia in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Case Rep Rheumatol. 2018;2018:6305356. doi: 10.1155/2018/6305356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Mise K, Ubara Y, Matsumoto M, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Hoshino J, Sawa N, Ohashi K, Kokame K, Miyata T, Fujimura Y, Takaichi K. Long term follow up of congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (Upshaw–Schulman syndrome) on hemodialysis for 19 years: a case report. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sekine A, Hasegawa E, Hiramatsu R, Mise K, Sumida K, Ueno T, Yamanouchi M, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Hoshino J, Sawa N, Takaichi K, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Ubara Y. Two types of renovascular lesions in lupus nephritis with clinical thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Case Rep Nephrol Dial. 2015;5:192–199. doi: 10.1159/000441107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Noda-Narita S, Sumida K, Sekine A, Hoshino J, Mise K, Suwabe T, Hayami N, Yamanouchi M, Ueno T, Mizuno H, Kawada M, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Sawa N, Takaichi K, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Ubara Y. TAFRO syndrome with refractory thrombocytopenia responding to tocilizumab and romiplostim: a case report. CEN Case Rep. 2018;7:162–168. doi: 10.1007/s13730-018-0319-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Mizuno H, Sawa N, Watanabe S, Ikuma D, Sekine A, Kawada M, Yamanouchi M, Hasegawa E, Suwabe T, Hoshino J, Takaichi K, Kinowaki K, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Nagata M, Yamaguchi Y, Ubara Y. The clinical and histopathological feature of renal manifestation of TAFRO syndrome. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(8):1172–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Simard-Meilleur MC, Troyanov S, Roy L, Dalaire E, Brachemi S. Risk factors and timing of native kidney biopsy complications. Nephron Extra. 2014;4:42–49. doi: 10.1159/000360087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Piccoli GB, Daidola G, Attini R, Parisi S, Fassio F, Naretto C, Deagostini MC, Castelluccia N, Ferraresi M, Roccatello D, Todros T. Kidney biopsy in pregnancy: evidence for counselling? A systematic narrative review. BJOG. 2013;120:412–427. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Blom K, Odutayo A, Bramham K, Hladunewich MA. Pregnancy and glomerular disease: a systematic review of the literature with management guidelines. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12:1862–1872. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00130117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Davison JM, Dunlop W. Renal hemodynamics and tubular function normal human pregnancy. Kidney Int. 1980;18:152–161. doi: 10.1038/ki.1980.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Higby K, Suiter CR, Phelps JY, Siler-Khodr T, Langer O. Normal values of urinary albumin and total protein excretion during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:984–989. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(13)90019-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Li Y, Wang W, Wang Y, Chen Q. Fetal risks and maternal renal complications in pregnancy with preexisting chronic glomerulonephritis. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:1008–1016. doi: 10.12659/MSM.905494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Piccoli GB, Cabiddu G, Attini R, Vigotti FN, Maxia S, Lepori N, Tuveri M, Massidda M, Marchi C, Mura S, Coscia A, Biolcati M, Gaglioti P, Nichelatti M, Pibiri L, Chessa G, Pani A, Todros T. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26:2011–2022. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014050459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Limardo M, Imbasciati E, Ravani P, Surian M, Torres D, Gregorini G, Magistroni R, Casellato D, Gammaro L, Pozzi C, Rene e Gravidanza Collaborative Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology Pregnancy and progression of IgA nephropathy: results of an Italian multicenter study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:506–512. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Caritis S, Sibai B, Hauth J, Lindheimer MD, Klebanoff M, Thom E, VanDorsten P, Landon M, Paul R, Miodovnik M, Meis P, Thurnau G. Low-dose aspirin to prevent preeclampsia in women at high risk. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:701–705. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199803123381101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Bujold E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y, Bureau M, Audibert F, Marcoux S, Forest JC, Giguère Y. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):402–414. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e9322a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lindheimer MD, Spargo BH, Katz AI. Kidney biopsy in pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Reprod Med. 1975;15:189–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ochsenbein-Kölble N, Roos M, Gasser T, Huch R, Huch A, Zimmermann R. Cross sectional study of automated blood pressure measurements throughout pregnancy. BJOG. 2004;111:319–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Radisic MV, Feldman D, Diaz C, Froment RO. Unexplained hematuria during pregnancy: right-sided nutcracker phenomenon. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39:709–711. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9101-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Motha MB, Palihawadana TS, Dias TD, Wijesinghe PS. Nutcracker syndrome in pregnancy: a worrying presentation of a benign condition. Ceylon Med J. 2017;62:238–239. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v62i4.8574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology. 2006;240:6–22. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2401050061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Rev Radiol. 1991;178:253–258. doi: 10.1148/radiology.178.1.1984314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Gordetsky J, Eich ML, Garapati M, Del Pena MCR, Rais-Bahrami S. Active surveillance of small renal masses. Urology. 2019;123:157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Sawa N, Ubara Y, Katori H, Hoshino J, Suwabe T, Tagami T, Takemoto F, Miyakoshi S, Taniguchi S, Ohashi K, Takaichi K. Renal intravascular large B-cell lymphoma localized only within peritubular capillaries. Report of a case. Intern Med. 2007;46:657–662. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.6333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Hasegawa J, Hoshino J, Suwabe T, Hayami N, Sumida K, Mise K, Ueno T, Sawa N, Wake A, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Honda K, Takaichi K, Ubara Y. Characteristics of intravascular large B-cell lymphoma limited to the glomerular capillaries: a case report. Case Rep Nephrol Dial. 2015;5:173–179. doi: 10.1159/000437296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Agostoni P, Abbate A, Fusaro M, Burzotta F, Testa L, Sheiban I, Sangiorgi G. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the hazards of discontinuing or not adhering to aspirin among 50,279 patients at risk for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2667–2674. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Lees JS, McQuarrie EP, Mordi N, Geddes CC, Fox JG, Mackinnon B. Risk factors for bleeding complications after nephrologist-performed native kidney biopsy. Clin Kidney J. 2017;10:573–577. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Fujimoto K, Fujishiro M, Kato M, Higuchi K, Iwakiri R, Sakamoto C, Uchiyama S, Kashiwagi A, Ogawa H, Murakami K, Mine T, Yoshino J, Kinoshita Y, Ichinose M, Matsui T, Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society Guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(1):1–14. doi: 10.1111/den.12183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Fernandez Lynch H, Joffe S, Feldman EA. Informed consent and the role of the treating physician. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2433–2438. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhle1800071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Whittier WL, Korbet SM. Timing of complications in percutaneous kidney biopsy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:142–147. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000102472.37947.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Lin WC, Yang Y, Wen YK, Chang CC. Outpatient versus inpatient kidney biopsy: a retrospective study. Clin Nephrol. 2006;66:17–24. doi: 10.5414/CNP66017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Bairy M, Beleed K, Webb AT, Bhandari S. Safety of outpatient kidney biopsy: one center's experience with 178 native kidney biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52:631–632. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Roccatello D, Sciascia S, Rossi D, Naretto C, Bazzan M, Solfietti L, Baldovino S, Menegatti E. Outpatient percutaneous native kidney biopsy: safety profile in a large monocentric cohort. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Šimunov B, Gunjača M, Čingel B, Škegro D, Knotek M. Safety of outpatient kidney biopsies. Nephron. 2018;138:275–279. doi: 10.1159/000484991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Kajawo S, Moloi MW, Noubiap JJ, Ekrikpo U, Kengne AP, Okpechi IG. Incidence of major complications after percutaneous native renal biopsies in adults from low-income to middle-income countries: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4):e020891. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Iversen P, Brun C. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney, 1951. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997;8(11):1778–1787. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V8111778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Schorr M, Roshanov PS, Weir MA, House AA. Frequency, timing, and prediction of major bleeding complications from percutaneous kidney biopsy. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020;25(7):2054358120923527. doi: 10.1177/2054358120923527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Korbet SM. Nephrology and the percutaneous kidney biopsy: a procedure in jeopardy of being lost along the way. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:1545–1547. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08290812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Kark RM, Muehrcke RC. Biopsy of kidney in prone position. Lancet. 1954;266:1047–1049. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(54)91618-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Kark RM, Muehrcke RC, Pollak VE, Kiefer JH. An analysis of five hundred percutaneous renal biopsies. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1958;101:439–451. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1958.00260140271038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Madaio MP. kidney biopsy. Kidney Int. 1990;38:529–543. doi: 10.1038/ki.1990.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Donovan KL, Thomas DM, Wheeler DC, Macdougall IC, Williams JD. Experience with a new method for percutaneous kidney biopsy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1991;6:731–733. doi: 10.1093/ndt/6.10.731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Bataille S, Jourde N, Daniel L, Mondain JR, Faure M, Gobert P, Alcheikh-Hassan Z, Lankester M, Giaime P, Gaudart J, Dussol B, Berland Y, Burtey S. Comparative safety and efficiency of five percutaneous kidney biopsy approaches of native kidneys: a multicenter study. Am J Nephrol. 2012;35:387–393. doi: 10.1159/000337932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Tuladhar AS, Shrestha A, Pradhan S, Manandhar DN, Chhetri Poudyal PK, Rijal A, Poudel P, Maskey A, Bhoomi KK. USG assisted and USG guided percutaneous kidney biopsy at Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital: a three and half years study. Nepal Med Coll J. 2014;16:26–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Rao NS, Chandra A. Needle guides enhance tissue adequacy and safety of ultrasound-guided renal biopsies. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2018;37:41–48. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.2018.37.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Shamshirgar F, Bagheri SM. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy; a comparison of axial vs. sagittal probe location. Rom J Intern Med. 2017;55:96–102. doi: 10.1515/rjim-2017-0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Bandari J, Fuller TW, Turner Ii RM, D'Agostino LA. Kidney biopsy for medical renal disease: indications and contraindications. Can J Urol. 2016;23(1):8121–8126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Stec AA, Stratton KL, Kaufman MR, Chang SS, Milam DF, Herrell SD, Dmochowski RR, Smith JA, Jr, Clark PE, Cookson MS. Open Kidney biopsy: comorbidities and complications in a contemporary series. BJU Int. 2010;106(1):102–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09015.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Shetye KR, Kavoussi LR, Ramakumar S, Fugita OE, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic Kidney biopsy: a 9-year experience. BJU Int. 2003;91(9):817–820. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04243.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Furness PN, Philpott CM, Chorbadjian MT, Nicholson ML, Bosmans JL, Corthouts BL, Bogers JJ, Schwarz A, Gwinner W, Haller H, Mengel M, Seron D, Moreso F, Cañas C. Protocol biopsy of the stable renal transplant: a multicenter study of methods and complication. Transplantation. 2003;76:969–973. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000082542.99416.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Schwarz A, Gwinner W, Hiss M, Radermacher J, Mengel M, Haller H. Safety and adequacy of renal transplant protocol biopsies. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:1992–1996. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00988.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Danovitch GM, editor. Handbook of kidney transplantation. 5. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 150.Korbet SM. Percutaneous Kidney biopsy. Semin Nephrol. 2002;22:254–267. doi: 10.1053/snep.2002.31713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Burstein DM, Schwartz MM, Korbet SM. Percutaneous Kidney biopsy with the use of real-time ultrasound. Am J Nephrol. 1991;11:195–200. doi: 10.1159/000168303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Marwah DS, Korbet SM. Timing of complications in percutaneous Kidney biopsy: what is the optimal period of observation? Am J Kidney Dis. 1996;28:47–52. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(96)90129-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Mendelssohn DC, Cole EH. Outcomes of percutaneous kidney biopsy, including those of solitary native kidneys. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26:580–585. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90592-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Kim D, Kim H, Shin G, Ku S, Ma K, Shin S, Gi H, Lee E, Yim H. A randomized, prospective, comparative study of manual and automated renal biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32:426–431. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9740159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Nass K, O'Neill WC. Bedside Kidney biopsy: ultrasound guidance by the nephrologist. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;34:955–959. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(99)70058-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Eiro M, Katoh T, Watanabe T. Risk factors for bleeding complications in percutaneous Kidney biopsy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2005;9:40–45. doi: 10.1007/s10157-004-0326-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Manno C, Strippoli GF, Arnesano L, Bonifati C, Campobasso N, Gesualdo L, Schena FP. Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasound-guided Kidney biopsy. Kidney Int. 2004;66:1570–1577. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00922.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Fraser IR, Fairley KF. Kidney biopsy as an outpatient procedure. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;25:876–878. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90569-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Jones B, Puvaneswary M, Nanra R, Trevillian P, Carney S, Gillies A. Reduced duration of bed rest after percutaneous Kidney biopsy. Clin Nephrol. 1991;35:44–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Simckes AM, Blowey DL, Gyves KM, Alon US. Success and safety of same-day kidney biopsy in children and adolescents. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000;14:946–952. doi: 10.1007/s004670000316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Takeuchi Y, Ojima Y, Kagaya S, Aoki S, Nagasawa T. Manual compression and reflex syncope in native Kidney biopsy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018;22:1100–1107. doi: 10.1007/s10157-018-1560-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Ishikawa E, Nomura S, Obe T, Katayama K, Oosugi K, Murata T, Tanoue A, Fujimoto M, Matsuo H, Ito M. How long is strict bed rest necessary after Kidney biopsy? Clin Exp Nephrol. 2009;13:594–597. doi: 10.1007/s10157-009-0206-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Manno C, Bonifati C, Torres DD, Campobasso N, Schena FP. Desmopressin acetate in percutaneous ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57:850–855. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Khajehdehi P, Junaid SM, Salinas-Madrigal L, Schmitz PG, Bastani B. Percutaneous Kidney biopsy in the 1990s: safety, value, and implications for early hospital discharge. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;34:92–97. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(99)70113-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Rasmussen LR, Loft M, Nielsen TK, Bjødstrup Jensen M, Høyer S, Hørlyck A, Graumann O. Short-term complications for percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy of renal masses in adult outpatients. Acta Radiol. 2018;59(4):491–496. doi: 10.1177/0284185117720855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Renal Physicians Association RPA position on optimal length of observation after percutaneous Kidney biopsy. Clin Nephrol. 2001;56:179–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Waldo BD, Grabau ZJ, Mengistu TM, Crow WT. The value of post-biopsy ultrasound in predicting complications after percutaneous Kidney biopsy of native kidneys. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:2433–2439. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Ishikawa E, Nomura S, Hamaguchi T, Obe T, Inoue-Kiyohara M, Oosugi K, Katayama K, Ito M. Ultrasonography as a predictor of overt bleeding after Kidney biopsy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2009;13:325–331. doi: 10.1007/s10157-009-0165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Brachemi S, Bollée G. Kidney biopsy practice: what is the gold standard? World J Nephrol. 2014;3:287–294. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Franke M, Kramarczyk A, Taylan C, Maintz D, Hoppe B, Koerber F. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous Kidney biopsy in 295 children and adolescents: role of ultrasound and analysis of complications. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e114737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Xu DM, Chen M, Zhou FD, Zhao MH. Risk factors for severe bleeding complications in percutaneous Kidney biopsy. Am J Med Sci. 2017;353(3):230–235. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Yamamoto H, Hashimoto H, Nakamura M, Horiguchi H, Yasunaga H. Relationship between hospital volume and hemorrhagic complication after percutaneous Kidney biopsy: results from the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination database. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2015;19:271–277. doi: 10.1007/s10157-014-0986-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Tanaka K, Kitagawa M, Onishi A, Yamanari T, Ogawa-Akiyama A, Mise K, Inoue T, Morinaga H, Uchida HA, Sugiyama H, Wada J. Arterial stiffness is an independent risk factor for anemia after percutaneous native kidney biopsy. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2017;42:284–293. doi: 10.1159/000477453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Chikamatsu Y, Matsuda K, Takeuchi Y, Kagaya S, Ojima Y, Fukami H, Sato H, Saito A, Iwakura Y, Nagasawa T. Quantification of bleeding volume using computed tomography and clinical complications after percutaneous Kidney biopsy. Clin Kidney J. 2017;10:9–15. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Mejía-Vilet JM, Márquez-Martínez MA, Cordova-Sanchez BM, Ibargüengoitia MC, Correa-Rotter R, Morales-Buenrostro LE. Simple risk score for prediction of hemorrhagic complications after a percutaneous Kidney biopsy. Nephrology (Carlton) 2018;23:523–529. doi: 10.1111/nep.13055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Palsson R, Short SAP, Kibbelaar ZA, Amodu A, Stillman IE, Rennke HG, McMahon GM, Waikar SS. Bleeding complications after percutaneous native kidney biopsy: results from the Boston kidney biopsy cohort. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(4):511–518. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Chen TK, Estrella MM, Fine DM. Predictors of kidney biopsy complication among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2012;21:848–854. doi: 10.1177/0961203312439334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Fish R, Pinney J, Jain P, Addison C, Jones C, Jayawardene S, Booth J, Howie AJ, Ghonemy T, Rajabali S, Roberts D, White L, Khan S, Morgan M, Cockwell P, Hutchison CA. The incidence of major hemorrhagic complications after renal biopsies in patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1977–1980. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00650110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Altindal M, Yildirim T, Turkmen E, Unal M, Boga I, Yilmaz R, Arici M, Altun B, Erdem Y. Safety of percutaneous ultrasound-guided kidney biopsy in patients with AA amyloidosis. Nephron. 2015;131:17–22. doi: 10.1159/000437443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Ali H, Murtaza A, Anderton J, Ahmed A. Post Kidney biopsy complication rate and diagnostic yield comparing hands free (ultrasound-assisted) and ultrasound-guided biopsy techniques of renal allografts and native kidneys. Springerplus. 2015;4:491. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1292-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Mai J, Yong J, Dixson H, Makris A, Aravindan A, Suranyi MG, Wong J. Is bigger better? A retrospective analysis of native renal biopsies with 16 Gauge versus 18 Gauge automatic needles. Nephrology (Carlton) 2013;18:525–530. doi: 10.1111/nep.12093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Antunes PRB, Prado FFM, de Souza FTA, de Siqueira EC, de Campos MÁ, Álvares MCB, Neto RB. Clinical complications in Kidney biopsy using two different needle gauges: the impact of large hematomas, a random clinical trial study. Int J Urol. 2018;25:544–548. doi: 10.1111/iju.13559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Prasad N, Kumar S, Manjunath R, Bhadauria D, Kaul A, Sharma RK, Gupta A, Lal H, Jain M, Agrawal V. Real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous Kidney biopsy with needle guide by nephrologists decreases post-biopsy complications. Clin Kidney J. 2015;8:151–156. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Torres Muñoz A, Valdez-Ortiz R, González-Parra C, Espinoza-Dávila E, Morales-Buenrostro LE, Correa-Rotter R. Percutaneous Kidney biopsy of native kidneys: efficiency, safety and risk factors associated with major complications. Arch Med Sci. 2011;7:823–831. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2011.25557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Lubas A, Wojtecka A, Smoszna J, Koziński P, Frankowska E, Niemczyk S. Hemodynamic characteristics and the occurrence of Kidney biopsy-related arteriovenous fistulas in native kidneys. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48:1667–1673. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1411-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Meng CH, Elkin M. Immediate angiographic manifestations of iatrogenic renal injury due to percutaneous needle biopsy. Radiology. 1971;100:335–341. doi: 10.1148/100.2.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Stiles KP, Yuan CM, Chung EM, Lyon RD, Lane JD, Abbott KC. Kidney biopsy in high-risk patients with medical diseases of the kidney. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36:419–433. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2000.8998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Gülcü A, Göktay Y, Soylu A, Türkmen M, Kavukçu S, Seçil M, Karabay N. Doppler US evaluation of Kidney biopsy complications in children. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;19:15–19. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.5968-12.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Buczek M, Popiela TJ, Urbanik A. Pseudoaneurysma as iatrogenic complication of Kidney biopsy: management by transcatheter embolization. Przegl Lek. 2012;69:357–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Ito T, Ishikawa E, Ito M. Lumbar artery injury following Kidney biopsy. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2016;20:145–146. doi: 10.1007/s10157-015-1157-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Krejčí K, Černá M, Žamboch K, Orság J, Klíčová A, Zadražil J. Late rupture of lumbar artery as an unusual complication after Kidney biopsy: case report. Urol Int. 2017;98:112–114. doi: 10.1159/000443702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Ono A, Inoue T, Tomori K, Okada H. Page kidney following Kidney biopsy. Intern Med. 2017;56:875. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Ham YR, Moon KR, Bae HJ, Ju HJ, Jang WI, Choi DE, Na KR, Lee KW, Shin YT. A case of urine leakage: an unusual complication after Kidney biopsy. Chonnam Med J. 2011;47:181–184. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2011.47.3.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Whittier WL, Sayeed K, Korbet SM. Clinical factors influencing the decision to transfuse after percutaneous native kidney biopsy. Clin Kidney J. 2016;9:102–107. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Alotaibi M, Shrouder-Henry J, Amaral J, Parra D, Temple M, John P, Connolly B. The positive color Doppler sign post biopsy: effectiveness of US-directed compression in achieving hemostasis. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41:362–368. doi: 10.1007/s00247-010-1848-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Hu T, Liu Q, Xu Q, Liu H, Feng Y, Qiu W, Huang F, Lv Y. Absorption fever characteristics due to percutaneous Kidney biopsy-related hematoma. Medicine. 2016;95:e4754. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Shima N, Hayami N, Mizuno H, Kawada M, Sekine A, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Yamanouchi M, Hasegawa E, Suwabe T, Hoshino J, Sawa N, Takaichi K, Ohashi K, Fujii T, Minota S, Ubara Y. Arteriovenous fistula-related renal bleeding 5 days after percutaneous Kidney biopsy. CEN Case Rep. 2019;8(4):280–284. doi: 10.1007/s13730-019-00408-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Solez K, Axelsen RA, Benediktsson H, Burdick JF, Cohen AH, Colvin RB, Croker BP, Droz D, Dunnill MS, Halloran PF, et al. International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int. 1993;44:411–422. doi: 10.1038/ki.1993.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Corwin HL, Schwartz MM, Lewis EJ. The importance of sample size in the interpretation of the Kidney biopsy. Am J Nephrol. 1988;8:85–89. doi: 10.1159/000167563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Wang HJ, Kjellstrand CM, Cockfield SM, Solez K. On the influence of sample size on the prognostic accuracy and reproducibility of renal transplant biopsy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:165–172. doi: 10.1093/ndt/13.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Luciano RL, Moeckel GW. Update on the native kidney biopsy: core curriculum 2019. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73:404–415. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Nasr SH, Galgano SJ, Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, D'Agati VD. Immunofluorescence on pronase-digested paraffin sections: a valuable salvage technique for renal biopsies. Kidney Int. 2006;70:2148–2151. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Deshpande V, Zen Y, Chan JK, Yi EE, Sato Y, Yoshino T, Klöppel G, Heathcote JG, Khosroshahi A, Ferry JA, Aalberse RC, Bloch DB, Brugge WR, Bateman AC, Carruthers MN, Chari ST, Cheuk W, Cornell LD, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Forcione DG, Hamilos DL, Kamisawa T, Kasashima S, Kawa S, Kawano M, Lauwers GY, Masaki Y, Nakanuma Y, Notohara K, Okazaki K, Ryu JK, Saeki T, Sahani DV, Smyrk TC, Stone JR, Takahira M, Webster GJ, Yamamoto M, Zamboni G, Umehara H, Stone JH. Consensus statement on the pathology of IgG4-related disease. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1181–1192. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Vernier RL, Farquhar MG, Brunson JG, Good RA. Chronic renal disease in children; correlation of clinical findings with morphologic characteristics seen by light and electron microscopy. AMA J Dis Child. 1958;96:306–343. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1958.02060060308009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Vehaskari VM, Rapola J, Koskimies O, Savilahti E, Vilska J, Hallman N. Microscopic hematuria in school children: epidemiology and clinicopathologic evaluation. J Pediatr. 1979;95:676–684. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(79)80710-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Takei S, Maeno N, Shigemori M, Imanaka H, Mori H, Nerome Y, Kanekura S, Takezaki T, Hokonohara M, Miyata K, Fujikawa S. Clinical features of Japanese children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus: results of 1980–1994 survey. Acta Pediatr Jpn. 1997;39:250–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.1997.tb03594.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Wakiguchi H, Takei S, Kubota T, Miyazono A, Kawano Y. Treatable renal disease in children with silent lupus nephritis detected by baseline biopsy: association with serum C3 levels. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36:433–437. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3491-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Ito S, Ogura M, Kamei K, Matsuoka K, Warnock DG. Significant improvement in Fabry disease podocytopathy after 3 years of treatment with agalsidase beta. Pediatr Nephrol. 2016;31:1369–1373. doi: 10.1007/s00467-016-3387-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Najafian B, Mauer M, Hopkin RJ, Svarstad E. Renal complications of Fabry disease in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013;28:679–687. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2222-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Emma F, Bertini E, Salviati L, Montini G. Renal involvement in mitochondrial cytopathies. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27:539–550. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-1926-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Nozu K, Nakanishi K, Abe Y, Udagawa T, Okada S, Okamoto T, Kaito H, Kanemoto K, Kobayashi A, Tanaka E, Tanaka K, Hama T, Fujimaru R, Miwa S, Yamamura T, Yamamura N, Horinouchi T, Minamikawa S, Nagata M, Iijima K. A review of clinical characteristics and genetic backgrounds in Alport syndrome. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2019;23(2):158–168. doi: 10.1007/s10157-018-1629-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Kamiyoshi N, Nozu K, Fu XJ, Morisada N, Nozu Y, Ye MJ, Imafuku A, Miura K, Yamamura T, Minamikawa S, Shono A, Ninchoji T, Morioka I, Nakanishi K, Yoshikawa N, Kaito H, Iijima K. Genetic, clinical, and pathologic backgrounds of patients with autosomal dominant Alport syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(8):1441–1449. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01000116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Horinouchi T, Nozu K, Yamamura T, Minamikawa S, Omori T, Nakanishi K, Fujimura J, Ashida A, Kitamura M, Kawano M, Shimabukuro W, Kitabayashi C, Imafuku A, Tamagaki K, Kamei K, Okamoto K, Fujinaga S, Oka M, Igarashi T, Miyazono A, Sawanobori E, Fujimaru R, Nakanishi K, Shima Y, Matsuo M, Ye MJ, Nozu Y, Morisada N, Kaito H, Iijima K. Detection of splicing abnormalities and genotype-phenotype correlation in X-linked Alport syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(8):2244–2254. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018030228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Greenbaum LA, Simckes AM, McKenney D, Kainer G, Nagaraj SK, Trachtman H, Alon US. Pediatric biopsy of a single native kidney. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000;15:66–69. doi: 10.1007/s004670000417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Kang S, Yoon HS, Lee EH. Should healthy children who will undergo minor surgery be screened for coagulation disorder? Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2016;33:233–238. doi: 10.3109/08880018.2016.1166537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Guay J, Faraoni D, Bonhomme F, Borel Derlon A, Lasne D. Ability of hemostatic assessment to detect bleeding disorders and to predict abnormal surgical blood loss in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;25:1216–1226. doi: 10.1111/pan.12723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Bhasin N, Parker RI. Diagnostic outcome of preoperative coagulation testing in children. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014;31:458–466. doi: 10.3109/08880018.2014.905667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Samková A, Blatný J, Fiamoli V, Dulíček P, Pařízková E. Significance and causes of abnormal preoperative coagulation test results in children. Haemophilia. 2012;18:e297–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02665.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Estcourt LJ, Malouf R, Doree C, Trivella M, Hopewell S, Birchall J. Prophylactic platelet transfusions prior to surgery for people with a low platelet count. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9:CD012779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012779.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Varnell CD, Jr, Stone HK, Welge JA. Bleeding complications after pediatric kidney biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14:57–65. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05890518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Zhu MS, Chen JZ, Xu AP. Factors that can minimize bleeding compli-cations after Kidney biopsy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46:1969–1975. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0560-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Rianthavorn P, Kerr SJ, Chiengthong K. Safety of paediatric percutaneous native kidney biopsy and factors predicting bleeding complications. Nephrology (Carlton) 2014;19:143–148. doi: 10.1111/nep.12184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Vidhun J, Masciandro J, Varich L, Salvatierra O, Jr, Sarwal M. Safety and risk stratification of percutaneous biopsies of adult-sized renal allografts in infant and older pediatric recipients. Transplantation. 2003;76(3):552–557. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000076097.90123.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Kark RM. The development of percutaneous Kidney biopsy in man. Am J Kidney Dis. 1990;16:585–589. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(12)81045-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Pokhrel A, Agrawal RK, Baral A, Rajbhandari A, Hada R. Percutaneous Kidney biopsy: comparison of blind and real-time ultrasound-guided technique. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018;16(1):66–72. doi: 10.3126/jnhrc.v16i1.19369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Lindgren PG. Ultrasonically guided punctures. A modified technique. Radiology. 1980;137:235–237. doi: 10.1148/radiology.137.1.7422852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Chunduri S, Whittier WL, Korbet SM. Adequacy and complication rates with 14- vs. 16-gauge automated needles in percutaneous Kidney biopsy of native kidneys. Semin Dial. 2015;28:E11–14. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Øvrehus MA, Oldereid TS, Dadfar A, Bjørneklett R, Aasarød KI, Fogo AB, Ix JH, Hallan SI. Clinical phenotypes and long-term prognosis in white patients with biopsy-verified hypertensive nephrosclerosis. Kidney Int Rep. 2019;5(3):339–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Sethi I, Brier M, Dwyer A. Predicting post Kidney biopsy complications. Semin Dial. 2013;26(5):633–635. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.White RH, Poole C. Day care Kidney biopsy. Pediatr Nephrol. 1996;10:408–411. doi: 10.1007/s004670050130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Davis ID, Oehlenschlager W, O'Riordan MA, Avner ED. Pediatric Kidney biopsy: should this procedure be performed in an outpatient setting? Pediatr Nephrol. 1998;12:96–100. doi: 10.1007/s004670050412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Sinha MD, Lewis MA, Bradbury MG, Webb NJ. Percutaneous real-time ultrasound-guided Kidney biopsy by automated biopsy gun in children: safety and complications. J Nephrol. 2006;19(1):41–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Hussain F, Watson AR, Hayes J, Evans J. Standards for renal biopsies: comparison of inpatient and day care procedures. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18:53–56. doi: 10.1007/s00467-002-1003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Murphy MS. Sedation for invasive procedures in pediatrics. Arch Dis Child. 1997;77:281–284. doi: 10.1136/adc.77.4.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Reich DL, Silvay G. Ketamine: an update on the first twenty-five years of clinical experience. Can J Anaesth. 1989;36:186–197. doi: 10.1007/BF03011442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Green SM, Johnson NE. Ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures: part 2, review and implications. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19:1033–1046. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82569-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Mikhael MS, Wray S, Robb ND. Intravenous conscious sedation in children for outpatient dentistry. Br Dent J. 2007;203:323–331. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Di Liddo L, D'Angelo A, Nguyen B, Bailey B, Amre D, Stanciu C. Etomidate versus midazolam for procedural sedation in pediatric outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:433–440. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Cravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT, Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH, Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:795–804. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818fc334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Kamat PP, McCracken CE, Gillespie SE, Fortenberry JD, Stockwell JA, Cravero JP, Hebbar KB. Pediatric critical care physician-administered procedural sedation using propofol: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium Database. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16:11–20. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Mallory MD, Baxter AL, Yanosky DJ, Cravero JP, Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium Emergency physician-administered propofol sedation: a report on 25,433 sedations from the pediatric sedation research consortium. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57:462–468. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Mourani CC, Antakly MC, Haddad-Zebouni S. Pediatric Kidney biopsy: ambulatory versus overnight hospitalization. J Med Liban. 2001;49(6):316–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Hussain F, Mallik M, Marks SD, Watson AR, British Association of Paediatric Nephrology Renal biopsies in children: current practice and audit of outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:485–489. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Gupta A, Campion-Smith J, Hayes W, Deal JE, Gilbert RD, Inward C, Judd BA, Krishnan RG, Marks SD, O'Brien C, Shenoy M, Sinha MD, Tse Y, Tyerman K, Mallik M, Hussain F, British Association for Paediatric Nephrology Positive trends in paediatric Kidney biopsy service provision in the UK: a national survey and re-audit of paediatric Kidney biopsy practice. Pediatr Nephrol. 2016;31:613–621. doi: 10.1007/s00467-015-3247-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Muthusami P, Sunder S, Gallibois C, Kitamura E, Parra D, Amaral J, John P, Noone D, Connolly B. Measuring hemoglobin prior to early discharge without routine surveillance ultrasound after percutaneous native Kidney biopsy in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017;32:1927–1934. doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3680-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Gagnon MH, Lin MF, Lancia S, Salter A, Yano M. A color flow tract in ultrasound-guided random renal core biopsy predicts complications. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(7):1335–1342. doi: 10.1002/jum.15227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Ding JJ, Lin SH, Huang JL, Wu TW, Hsia SH, Lin JJ, Chou YC, Tseng MH. Risk factors for complications of percutaneous ultrasound-guided Kidney biopsy in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2020;35(2):271–278. doi: 10.1007/s00467-019-04367-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Isiyel E, Fidan K, Buyukkaragoz B, Akcaboy M, Kandur Y, Gonul II, Buyan N, Bakkaloglu S, Soylemezoglu O. Results of native and transplant kidney biopsies of children in a single center over a 15 years period. Ren Fail. 2017;39(1):702–706. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2017.1398094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Hunsicker LG, Bennett LE. Design of trials of methods to reduce late renal allograft loss: the price of success. Kidney Int (Suppl) 1995;52:S120–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Wilkinson A. Protocol transplant biopsies: are they really needed? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(1):130–137. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00350705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Birk PE, Blydt-Hansen TD, Dart AB, Kaita LM, Proulx C, Taylor G. Low incidence of adverse events in outpatient pediatric renal allograft biopsies. Pediatr Transplant. 2007;11(2):196–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00659.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

