Abstract
Introduction
Moraxella bovoculi is frequently isolated from the eyes of cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK; pinkeye). As with M. bovis, which has been causally linked to IBK, M. bovoculi expresses an RTX (repeats in the structural toxin) cytotoxin that is related to M. bovis cytotoxin. Pilin, another pathogenic factor in M. bovis , is required for corneal attachment. Seven antigenically distinct pilin serogroups have been described in M. bovis .
Hypothesis/Gap Statement
Multiple different serogroups exist amongst type IV pilin encoded by M. bovis , however, it is not known whether M. bovoculi exhibits a similar degree of diversity in type IV pilin that it encodes.
Aim
This study was done to characterize a structural pilin (PilA) encoded by M. bovoculi isolated from cases of IBK to determine if diversity exists amongst PilA sequences.
Methodology
Ninety-four isolates of M. bovoculi collected between 2002 and 2017 from 23 counties throughout California and from five counties in four other Western states were evaluated.
Results
DNA sequencing and determination of deduced amino acid sequences revealed ten (designated groups A through J) unique PilA sequences that were ~96.1–99.3 % identical. Pilin groups A and C matched previously reported putative PilA sequences from M. bovoculi isolated from IBK-affected cattle in the USA (Virginia, Nebraska, and Kansas) and Asia (Kazakhstan). The ten pilin sequences identified were only ~74–76 % identical to deduced amino acid sequences of putative pilin proteins identified from the previously reported whole-genome sequences of M. bovoculi derived from deep nasopharyngeal swabs of IBK-asymptomatic cattle.
Conclusions
Compared to the diversity reported between structural pilin proteins amongst different serogroups of M. bovis , M. bovoculi PilA from geographically diverse isolates derived from IBK-affected cattle are more conserved.
Keywords: infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis, Moraxella bovis, Moraxella bovoculi, pilin, PilA, pinkeye
Data Summary
Accession numbers for all supporting sequence data are provided in Table 1.
Table 1.
Summary of GenBank Accession numbers for PilA and ISR sequences in 94 isolates of M. bovoculi isolated from cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis
|
GenBank PilA Accession No. |
GenBank ISR Accession No. |
Collected by* |
Collection year |
PilA group |
Isolate |
County locations in the USA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
8342 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
6170 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
4794 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
4787 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
4786 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
F |
4785 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
4773 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
2473 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
B |
2470–1 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
2467 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
I |
380 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
376 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
371 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
317 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2002 |
A |
237 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2006 |
B |
153R |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2006 |
B |
151RB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2008 |
B |
130LB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2008 |
B |
112R |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2006 |
A |
111L |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2007 |
B |
108RB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2007 |
A |
108LB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2008 |
C |
105L |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2006 |
C |
78LB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2007 |
B |
67LB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
E |
60 |
Kings County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2007 |
A |
59RB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2007 |
B |
59LB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
A |
59 |
Franklin County, ID |
||
|
KAC |
2016 |
H |
58 |
Tulare County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2016 |
D |
57 |
Kern County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2016 |
A |
56 |
Tulare County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
A |
55 |
Kings County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
C |
54 |
Kern County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
A |
53 |
Tulare County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2013 |
C |
51 |
Yolo County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
B |
50 |
Jerome County, ID |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
B |
49 |
Stanislaus County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
A |
48 |
Placer County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
A |
47 |
Humboldt County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2007 |
C |
46L |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2011 |
A |
46 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2011 |
A |
45 |
Stanislaus County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2011 |
A |
44 |
Modoc County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2011 |
A |
43 |
Siskiyou County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2011 |
E |
42 |
Sonoma County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2008 |
A |
41LB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2011 |
B |
41 |
San Joaquin County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2012 |
A |
40 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2011 |
A |
39 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2013 |
B |
38 |
Marin County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2014 |
D |
37 |
Lassen County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2014 |
A |
36 |
Humboldt County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2012 |
C |
35 |
Sonoma County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2012 |
B |
34 |
Trinity County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2006 |
B |
33RB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2013 |
C |
33 |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2012 |
C |
32 |
Modoc County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2008 |
A |
31L |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2013 |
A |
31 |
Yavapai County, AZ |
||
|
JAA |
2006 |
B |
30LB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2013 |
A |
30 |
El Dorado County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2007 |
B |
29RB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2013 |
A |
29 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2012 |
A |
28 |
Chaves County, NM |
||
|
KAC |
2012 |
J |
27 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2007 |
B |
26RB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2013 |
A |
26 |
Mendocino County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2012 |
C |
25 |
Marin County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2013 |
A |
24 |
Marin County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
A |
23 |
Modoc County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2014 |
A |
22 |
San Bernardino County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
A |
21 |
Kern County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2015 |
A |
20 |
Fresno County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
A |
19 |
Yolo County, CA |
||
|
JAA |
2006 |
B |
18LB |
Yuba County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2015 |
A |
18 |
Plumas County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2015 |
C |
17 |
Calaveras County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2015 |
G |
16 |
Yolo County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2015 |
C |
15 |
Sonoma County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2016 |
D |
14 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2016 |
D |
13 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2015 |
A |
12 |
Humboldt County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2017 |
D |
11 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2008 |
C |
10 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2008 |
A |
9 |
Sonoma County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2008 |
A |
8 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2009 |
B |
7 |
Sacramento County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2009 |
C |
6 |
Sonoma County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2009 |
A |
5 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2009 |
A |
4 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2010 |
C |
3 |
Stanislaus County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2009 |
A |
2 |
Merced County, CA |
||
|
KAC |
2010 |
A |
1 |
Washoe County, NV |
*JAA: John A. Angelos; KAC: Kristin A. Clothier
Impact Statement.
Pilin (PilA) from M. bovoculi is conserved amongst geographically diverse isolates derived from cattle with IBK and displays considerably less variability amongst isolates compared to M. bovis pilins from different M. bovis serogroups. The significance of M. bovoculi pilin as it relates to the pathogenesis of IBK is presently unknown.
Introduction
Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK; pinkeye) is the most common eye disease of cattle and is characterized by the presence of corneal ulceration, corneal oedema, conjunctivitis, and eye pain. First reported in 2007 [1], M. bovoculi is now more frequently isolated from eyes of cattle affected with IBK compared to M. bovis [2, 3]. While Koch’s postulates were previously established for M. bovis and IBK [4], a direct link between the type strain of M. bovoculi (no. 237) and corneal ulceration in a scarification model of infection in dairy calves could not be established [5]. Two distinct genotypes have been characterized in M. bovoculi ; genotype 1 is associated with IBK-affected cattle while genotype 2 is associated with IBK-asymptomatic cattle [6, 7]. Recent studies have also identified different matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) profiles between the two genotypes [8].
From reports of isolations of M. bovoculi in different parts of the world, it is known that this organism has widespread geographic distribution amongst cattle as well as other ruminant [9, 10] and non-ruminant [11] species. One specific pathogenic factor that may be important in the capacity for M. bovoculi to contribute to the pathogenesis of IBK is an RTX (repeats in the structural toxin) toxin [12] that has been shown to be similar to the M. bovis RTX toxin (cytotoxin) [13]. The role of this RTX toxin in the pathogenesis of M. bovoculi is not known and some genotype 1 strains have been identified that do not possess RTX toxin genes [6, 7].
In addition to cytotoxin, the pathogenesis of M. bovis involves expression of pili that allow it to adhere to corneal epithelial cells [14–16]. For M. bovis it is thought that the presence of multiple M. bovis pilus serogroups [17] coupled with pilin gene inversions [18] increases antigenic variability and accounts for antigenic switching that may allow M. bovis to evade a host’s immune response [19].
The purpose of this study was to characterize PilA from geographically diverse Western USA isolates of M. bovoculi from IBK-affected cattle. We also sought to compare deduced pilin amino acid sequences from these Western USA isolates with pilin-related sequences from isolates of M. bovoculi whose full-genome sequences were previously submitted to GenBank, pilin-related sequences from M. ovis, and previously defined pilins from characterized serogroups of M. bovis .
Methods
Bacterial isolate source and identification
A total of 94 isolates of M. bovoculi from cases of IBK in cattle from 28 counties were used for this study (see Table 1). Bacterial isolates were cultured from ocular swabs from eyes of cattle with IBK that had been collected by one of the authors (JAA), or submitted to the California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory (CAHFS), Davis, CA and provided by one of the authors (KAC). Isolates (n=35) collected by JAA were from beef calves at the University of California Sierra Foothills Research and Extension Center, Brown’s Valley, Yuba County, CA (SFREC) during 2002 (n=5), 2006 (n=7), 2007 (n=8) and 2008 (n=5), or from IBK-affected dairy calves at a commercial dairy in Yuba County, CA during 2002 (n=10). Isolates provided by KAC (n=59) originated from cattle in 23 California counties (n=54), 2 Idaho counties (n=2), Arizona (n=1), Nevada (n=1), and New Mexico (n=1) during 2008–2017. Amongst the SFREC isolates collected during 2008, two isolates originated from each of two steers that had developed a corneal ulcer associated with IBK in a left eye, recovered and then developed an ulcer associated with IBK in the right eye 4–10 weeks later. One isolate included in this study from JAA ( M. bovoculi 237) is the type strain for the species [1].
Isolates were confirmed as M. bovoculi on the basis of biochemical testing as well as by blast analysis against the GenBank database of an amplified and sequenced ribosomal RNA gene (partial 16S ribosomal RNA gene and 16 S-23S ribosomal RNA intergenic spacer; ISR) (details provided below). A subset of isolates collected by one of the authors (KAC) was also subject to analysis by MALDI-TOF testing (see below). Ocular swabs were streaked onto trypticase soy agar with 0.5 % sheep blood plates (SBA) and incubated at 35 °C. Colonies with morphology consistent with Moraxella spp. after 24–48 h of incubation were subcultured for further characterization. Isolates that were catalase-positive, oxidase-positive, Gram-negative coccobacilli, negative for carbohydrate fermentation, able to reduce nitrate, negative for casein hydrolysis, and able to deaminate phenylalanine were characterized as M. bovoculi . Isolates were stored frozen at −70 °C until use.
The isolates provided by KAC (n=59) were also subject to MALDI-TOF testing by incubating isolates overnight on SBA at 35 °C in a 5–10 % CO2 atmosphere. Isolates were tested according to the MALDI-TOF instrument manufacturer’s recommended procedure for the direct smear method using α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (Bruker Daltronics, Billerica, MA, USA), and subjected to automatic detection in a positive linear mode between 2 kDa and 20 kDa m/hz, with a laser frequency of 60 Hz (Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS, Bruker Daltronics). The system was calibrated for reference masses of 3637–16 952 Da using the manufacturer’s supplied bacterial test standard. Up to 240 spectrum profiles were obtained per colony, and all colonies were tested in duplicate. Bacterial identifications were determined using commercial software and the database provided by the manufacturer (Compass, 4.1, Bruker Daltronics). Identity scores >2.0 were considered very good to the genus and species level per the manufacturer’s guidelines.
Genomic DNA and PCR
M. bovoculi isolates were thawed, streaked onto 5 % SBA, and incubated at 35 °C for 18–20 h. Genomic DNA was purified from whole bacteria using a commercial kit (DNEasy kit; Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). Further confirmation of all isolates as M. bovoculi was made by blast analysis of an amplified and sequenced ribosomal RNA gene (partial 16S ribosomal RNA gene and 16 S-23S ribosomal RNA intergenic spacer; ISR) against the GenBank database. This region was amplified from genomic DNA with primers ISRdown (5′-GTG AAG TCG TAA CAA GGT AGC CGT-3′) and ISRup (5′-ACC GAC GCT TAT CGC AGG CTA TCA-3′) using previously described PCR conditions [20]; all isolates had high % identify (99.6–100 %) to ISR sequences of M. bovoculi that were previously submitted to the GenBank database.
The pilA gene was amplified from genomic DNA using primers Mbovoc_Pilin_Dn (5′-GTG GGG TTA CAT AAA TAT AAA GA-3′) and Mbovoc_PilinUp3 (5′-GAT TAA TCA AAC CTT CAA ACA C-3′). These primers were designed to amplify a 685 bp fragment that spanned a type IV pilin (PilA) that was identified in the draft genome sequence of M. bovoculi 237 (GenBank accession no. AOMT01000037.1; locus_tag: MBO_08958; COG4969 Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA; GenBank accession no. KDN24455 and [21]). These primers were located from 88 base pairs upstream of an ATG start codon to 138 base pairs downstream of a TAG stop codon. The PCR conditions were an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 44 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 2 min, and a final incubation at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were purified (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit, Qiagen) and sequenced at the UC Davis DNA Sequencing Laboratory (Davis, CA, USA). Final pilA and ISR gene sequences were determined from overlapping sequences assembled with DNA sequence analysis software (Sequencher 5.4.6, Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbour, MI, USA).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
The ISR and pilA nucleotide sequence accession numbers for the 94 M . bovoculi evaluated for this study are MT353781-MT353874 (ISR sequences) and MT333648-MT333741 (pilA sequences). For comparing PilA sequences from this set of M. bovoculi isolates with previously reported pilin-related sequences in M. bovis , M. bovoculi and M. ovis , the deduced amino acid sequence of pilin- or PilA-related sequences for M. bovis , M. bovoculi and M. ovis were downloaded from the GenBank database. Accession numbers of sequences used for these comparisons are provided in Table 2.
Table 2.
Source information and GenBank accession nos. for M. bovis, M. bovoculi and M. ovis pilin-related proteins
|
Description |
Accession no. |
Species |
Strain |
Length (aa) |
Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
prepilin |
bovis |
3W07 |
158 |
source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup B |
|
|
prepilin |
bovis |
218R |
158 |
source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup F |
|
|
pilin; Tfp pilus assembly protein PilE |
bovis |
Dalton 2d |
156 |
source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup C |
|
|
prepilin; Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA |
bovis |
FL462 |
157 |
source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup G |
|
|
prepilin; Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA |
bovis |
H358CS |
159 |
source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup D |
|
|
prepilin |
bovis |
S276R |
160 |
source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup A |
|
|
prepilin; Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA |
bovis |
TAT849 |
159 |
source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup E |
|
|
type IV pilin PilA |
bovoculi |
237 |
152 |
source: bovine pinkeye; USA: California; culture collection: ATCC: BAA-1259 |
|
|
hypothetical protein AAX06_02925; pilin |
bovoculi |
22 581 |
156 |
source: bovine deep nasopharyngeal swab (asymptomatic animal); USA:Missouri |
|
|
hypothetical protein AAX05_08035; pilin |
bovoculi |
23 343 |
156 |
source: bovine deep nasopharyngeal swab (asymptomatic animal); USA: Tennessee |
|
|
hypothetical protein AAX07_08580; pilin |
bovoculi |
28 389 |
156 |
source: bovine deep nasopharyngeal swab (asymptomatic animal); USA: Kentucky |
|
|
hypothetical protein AAX11_08125; pilin |
bovoculi |
33 362 |
156 |
source: bovine deep nasopharyngeal swab (asymptomatic animal); USA: Kansas |
|
|
hypothetical protein AAX08_01970; Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA |
bovoculi |
57 922 |
152 |
source: bovine pinkeye; USA: Kansas |
|
|
hypothetical protein AAX09_01900 |
bovoculi |
58 069 |
152 |
source: bovine pinkeye; USA: Nebraska |
|
|
prepilin-type N-terminal cleavage/methylation domain-containing protein; Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA |
bovoculi |
58 086 |
152 |
source: bovine pinkeye; USA: Virginia |
|
|
prepilin-type N-terminal cleavage/methylation domain-containing protein |
NSM11559 |
bovoculi |
KZ-1 |
152 |
source: bovine eye; country of origin: Kazakhstan: Akmola region |
|
pilin |
ovis |
156 |
|||
|
pilin |
ovis |
156 |
|||
|
hypothetical protein MOVS_07875; pilin |
ovis |
199/55 |
156 |
source: bovine pinkeye; country of origin: Norway; culture collection: ATCC: 33 078 |
|
|
Two subunits pilin |
ovis |
NCTC11019 |
156 |
contig: ERS1826247SCcontig000017 |
|
|
Two subunits pilin |
ovis |
NCTC11227 |
156 |
contig: ERS1247844SCcontig000001 |
|
|
Two subunits pilin |
ovis |
NCTC11969 |
156 |
contig: 58901_D01158901_D01558901_D012 |
Pilin sequence comparisons
The 94 pilA gene sequences were compared using a Muscle alignment (version 3.8.425 by Robert C. Edgar; Geneious Prime 2020.1.2). The deduced amino acid sequences of the 94 pilin sequences were aligned and compared with one another and to previously reported M. bovis , M. ovis and M. bovoculi pilin sequences (Table 2). Alignments were performed using Clustal Omega fast clustering (mBed algorithm in Geneious Prime 2020.1.2). Creation of a neighbour-joining consensus phylogenetic tree was performed using the Geneious Tree Builder (Jukes-Cantor genetic distance model; resampling: bootstrapping with 1000 replicates).
Results
DNA and deduced amino acid sequences of M. bovoculi pilin
A 459 bp ORF was identified in the sequenced amplicons of all 94 M . bovoculi isolates; 20 of these ORFs were unique. The deduced amino acid sequences of these 20 ORFs encoded ten unique PilA sequences that were designated M. bovoculi PilA groups A through J (Fig. 1). The number of isolates in these groups were 49, 19, 14, 5 and 2 for PilA groups A, B, C, D and E, respectively; one isolate each represented PilA groups F through J. The most frequently identified PilA sequence in this collection of samples was group A, which was identified in 22 of the 28 counties from which the 94 isolates originated (Table 3).
Fig. 1.
Alignment of the ten M . bovoculi PilA groups A–J deduced amino acid sequences (sequences 1, 6–8 and 10–15) identified in 94 M. bovoculi isolates derived from cattle with IBK that were evaluated for this study and previously reported M. bovoculi and M. ovis pilin-related sequences. Sequences 16–19 were from deep nasopharyngeal swabs of cattle without IBK that were first reported in [7]. Sequence 2 is derived from the whole-genome sequence of the type strain of M. bovoculi . Previously reported M. ovis pilin-related sequences 20–25 showed the most similarity to pilin-related sequences of M. bovoculi that were reported from deep nasopharyngeal swabs of IBK-asymptomatic cattle. Alignment created using Geneious version 2020.1 created by Biomatters; available from https://www.geneious.com.
Table 3.
Summary of year and county distribution of ten PilA groups identified in 94 isolates of M. bovoculi isolated from the eyes of cattle with IBK. Deduced amino acid sequences for each PilA group and associated GenBank accession numbers are shown below
|
PilA group∗ |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
|
No. of isolates (no. of unique pilA DNA sequences)† |
49 (6) |
19 (1) |
14 (5) |
5 (1) |
2 (2) |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Year(s) isolated |
2002; 2006; 2007; 2008; 2009; 2010; 2011; 2012; 2013; 2014; 2015; 2016; 2017 |
2002; 2006; 2007; 2008; 2009; 2011; 2012; 2013; 2017 |
2006; 2007; 2008; 2009; 2010; 2012; 2013; 2015; 2017 |
2014; 2016; 2017 |
2011; 2017 |
2002 |
2015 |
2016 |
2002 |
2012 |
|
Source county‡ |
Chaves (NM); El Dorado; Franklin (ID); Fresno; Humboldt; Kern; Kings; Marin; Mendocino; Merced; Modoc; Placer; Plumas; San Bernardino; Siskiyou; Sonoma; Stanislaus; Tulare; Washoe (NV); Yavapai (AZ); Yolo; Yuba |
Jerome (ID); Marin; Sacramento; San Joaquin; Stanislaus; Trinity; Yuba |
Calaveras; Kern; Marin; Merced; Modoc; Sonoma; Stanislaus; Yolo; Yuba |
Lassen; Kern; Merced |
Sonoma; Kings |
Yuba |
Yolo |
Tulare |
Yuba |
Merced |
†Genbank accession numbers: Group A (MT333648; MT333649; MT333650; MT333651; MT333652; MT333654; MT333655; MT333657; MT333659; MT333660; MT333661; MT333662; MT333667; MT333669; MT333674; MT333694; MT333706; MT333733; MT333734; MT333737; MT333738; MT333740; MT333741; MT333689; MT333690; MT333691; MT333692; MT333697; MT333696; MT333712; MT333707; MT333709; MT333711; MT333715; MT333717; MT333700; MT333719; MT333721; MT333724; MT333730; MT333679; MT333676; MT333680; MT333682; MT333686; MT333687; MT333718; MT333720; MT333722); Group B (MT333656; MT333663; MT333664; MT333703; MT333708; MT333723; MT333668; MT333672; MT333675; MT333710; MT333714; MT333665; MT333666; MT333735; MT333695; MT333702; MT333698; MT333684; MT333685); Group C (MT333671; MT333688; MT333670; MT333732; MT333736; MT333739; MT333701; MT333705; MT333716; MT333683; MT333704; MT333725; MT333727; MT333681); Group D (MT333699; MT333678; MT333728; MT333729; MT333731); Group E (MT333693; MT333673); Group F (MT333653); Group G (MT333726); Group H (MT333677); Group I (MT333658); Group J (MT333713). Isolates corresponding to accession numbers MT333669 (PilA group A) and MT333668 (PilA group B) were isolated from the same calf (but different IBK-affected eyes) on 5-26-2007 and 6-25-2007, respectively. Isolates corresponding to accession numbers MT333675 (PilA group B) and MT333674 (PilA group A) were isolated from the same calf (but different IBK-affected eyes) on 6-5-2007 and 8-17-2007, respectively.
‡Counties located in California except where indicated.
The deduced amino acid sequences of these ten unique PilA sequences shared a high degree of sequence similarity with overall identical sites and pairwise identity of 92.8 and 98.1 %, respectively. Differences in deduced amino acid sequences between the ten groups included four conservative and eight radical amino acid replacements. At residue 61, the sequences were equally divided between those with serine versus asparagine residues. In one of the pairs of SFREC isolates from 2008 that originated from a single animal, one exhibited a PilA group A sequence (accession MT333669) while the second obtained from the opposite eye approximately 4 weeks later exhibited a group B sequence (MT333668). In the second pair of two isolates that originated from a single animal, the initial isolate exhibited a PilA group B sequence (accession MT333675), while the second isolate obtained from the opposite eye approximately 10 weeks later exhibited a PilA group A sequence (accession MT333674).
Comparisons with previously reported M. bovoculi, M. ovis and M. bovis pilin-related sequences
Previously reported pilin-related sequences in M. bovoculi from IBK-affected cattle in Kansas (strain 57922), Virginia (strain 58086) and Kazakhstan (strain KZ-1) (respective GenBank accession nos.: AKG14945, AKG16627 and NSM11559) and the PilA protein from the type strain of M. bovoculi (237; KDN24455) were identical to the PilA group A deduced amino acid sequence. A previously reported hypothetical protein from a Nebraska isolate of M. bovoculi (strain 58069) from an IBK-affected cow (GenBank accession no.: AKG18359) was identical to the PilA group C deduced amino acid sequence. See Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Similarity matrix showing percent identities between sequences depicted in Fig. 1 (created using Geneious version 2020.1 created by Biomatters; available from https://www.geneious.com).
Comparisons of the PilA groups A–J deduced amino acid sequences with putative pilin deduced amino acid sequences that were identified in M. bovoculi from deep nasopharyngeal swabs of cattle that did not have IBK ( M. bovoculi strains 22 581, 23 343, 28 389 and 33 362 [7] with respective GenBank accession nos.: AKG07295, AKG10099, AKG12021 and AKG13989) revealed 74.3–75.7 % identity between sequence pairs (Fig. 2). Comparisons between previously reported M. ovis pilin sequences (GenBank accession nos.: WP_063514484, WP_112744298, ANB91903, SPX85670, STY87629 and STZ05528) and M. bovoculi PilA groups A–J showed approximately 75 % identity. These six M . ovis sequences exhibited 96.8–97.4 % identity to pilin-related sequences from M. bovoculi from deep nasopharyngeal swabs of IBK-asymptomatic cattle (strains 22 581, 23 343, 28 389 and 33 362 with respective GenBank accession nos.: AKG07295, AKG10099, AKG12021 and AKG13989) (Fig. 2).
Amongst the deduced pilin amino acid sequences for the previously reported eight M . bovis pilin serogroups A, B, C, D, E, F and G (GenBank accession nos.: L32968 (serogroup A); L32969 (serogroup B); AAA53087 (serogroup C); AAA53562 (serogroup D); AAA53561 (serogroup E); L32965 (serogroup F); and AAA53559 (serogroup G) [22]) there was 61.3–78.1 % identity (Fig. 2). The percent identity between the deduced amino acid sequence of these M. bovis pilin serogroup sequences and M. bovoculi PilA group A–J sequences ranged from 29.5–32.3 %. A phylogenetic tree depicting relationships between the pilin sequences listed in Table 1 and the ten M . bovoculi PilA groups identified in this study showed distinct clustering of pilin-deduced amino acid sequences from seven defined M. bovis serogroups, M. bovoculi isolated from cattle with IBK, M. ovis and M. bovoculi isolated from the nasopharynx of cattle without IBK (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Unrooted neighbour-joining consensus tree depicting relationships between M. bovoculi PilA groups A–J characterized from 94 M . bovoculi isolates from cattle with IBK in the Western USA and pilin-related deduced amino acid sequences previously reported in M. bovoculi from cattle with IBK (green box), M. ovis (yellow box) and M. bovis (grey box). Blue box indicates previously characterized M. bovoculi that were isolated from the nasopharynx of IBK-asymptomatic cattle [7]. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Bar, 0.2 substitutions per site (Geneious version 2020.1 created by Biomatters; https://www.geneious.com).
Discussion
In this study we found ten unique structural pilin (PilA)-deduced amino acid sequences amongst a collection of M. bovoculi that had been isolated from eyes of IBK-affected cattle throughout California and four other Western states (Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico and Arizona). Given the limited sample size and geographic distribution of isolates that we examined, however, it is impossible to say how likely or not it is that more PilA groups might exist amongst M. bovoculi . Since two of these PilA group sequences (A and C) matched PilA sequences in M. bovoculi from IBK-affected cattle from other locations in the USA (Kansas, Nebraska, Virginia) and Asia (Akmola region of Kazakhstan), it is possible that the PilA groups identified in this study are representative of M. bovoculi PilA sequences in general. Of the ten PilA groups that we identified, three (A, B and C) were the most widely distributed over geography and time, however, it is likely that a larger sample size would have revealed additional locations of these less well-represented PilA groups.
Among the ten PilA groups that were characterized in this study population, the overall degree of difference was very small compared to the seven M . bovis serogroups that have been characterized [17, 22]. Because M. bovoculi isolates that have been examined thus far via whole-genome sequencing have not displayed evidence for an I/Q pilin type phase shift [6] that was described in M. bovis [18, 23], it seems likely that any additional PilA group types that may be identified in the future will probably exhibit a relatively low degree of variability from one another as compared to the variability that is observed in M. bovis exhibiting different pilin serogroups.
It is currently not known whether or not PilA expression in M. bovoculi is a prerequisite for establishing colonization of the ocular surface. While published studies thus far have not supported a causal role for at least one strain of M. bovoculi in IBK [5], positive correlations have been reported between clinical signs of IBK and the presence of M. bovoculi [2, 3]. This suggests that M. bovoculi attachment to bovine ocular surfaces may be necessary for it to survive in/around ocular mucosal surfaces. If true, given what is known about the general role for pilins in host attachment and survival, it is logical to conclude that pilin probably does play a role in the ability of M. bovoculi to exist on ocular surfaces. Previous studies in other Moraxella species demonstrated that pilin is important for colonization and biofilm formation [24, 25] and a recent study demonstrated that M. bovoculi forms biofilms [26]. This suggests that pilin expression in M. bovoculi is likely involved in its ability to colonize the bovine eye. The fact that a putative PilA protein from M. bovoculi associated with the nasopharynx of IBK-asymptomatic cattle in Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky and Kansas [7] and PilA from M. bovoculi from IBK-affected cattle exhibit only ~75 % identity between deduced amino acid sequences raises the possibility that differences in pilin sequence allow survival on different mucosal sites (for example, ocular surface versus nasopharynx).
Whether or not differences between the 10 PilA groups that we identified have any bearing on evasion of a host immune response during clinical IBK associated with the presence of M. bovoculi remains to be determined. For M. bovis strain Epp63 it is known that recombination events involving pilin-expressing genes allow different forms of pilin to be expressed [18], and that these different forms of pilin are associated with colonization versus maintenance of infection [27]. In the population of M. bovoculi isolates that we examined for this study we identified two PilA groups in each of the two animals (PilA groups A and B) where IBK developed in different eyes over a period of weeks. In one animal a PilA group A isolate was followed by identification of a PilA group B isolate, while in the other animal in the same herd the initial isolate was a PilA group B isolate followed by a group A isolate. Additional studies are needed to determine whether cattle develop immune responses to M. bovoculi pilin during ocular infections and whether the sorts of PilA group changes that we observed were reflective of host immune selection or just pure coincidence.
Conclusion
M. bovoculi PilA deduced amino acid sequences exhibit some diversity, however, overall, PilA sequences are relatively conserved across geographically diverse isolates from cattle with IBK and much more conserved relative to M. bovis pilin serogroups. The exact role that M. bovoculi PilA might play in the ability of M. bovoculi to exist in/around bovine ocular tissues remains to be determined.
Funding information
This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Animal Health project 1009855.
Author contributions
J.A. conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, resources, data curation, writing – original draft preparation, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding; K.C. conceptualization, resources, writing – review and editing, funding; R.A. investigation, writing – review and editing; B.M. investigation, writing – review and editing; M.T. conceptualization, writing – review and editing, funding.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: IBK, infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; ORF, open reading frame; SBA, sheep blood agar plate; SFREC, Sierra Foothills Research and Extension Center.
References
- 1.Angelos JA, Spinks PQ, Ball LM, George LW. Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov., isolated from calves with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:789–795. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64333-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Loy JD, Brodersen BW. Moraxella spp. isolated from field outbreaks of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis: a retrospective study of case submissions from 2010 to 2013. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2014;26:761–768. doi: 10.1177/1040638714551403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schnee C, Heller M, Schubert E, Sachse K. Point prevalence of infection with Mycoplasma bovoculi and Moraxella spp. in cattle at different stages of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Vet J. 2015;203:92–96. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Henson JB, Grumbles LC. Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. I. etiology. Am J Vet Res. 1960;21:761–766. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gould S, Dewell R, Tofflemire K, Whitley RD, Millman ST, et al. Randomized blinded challenge study to assess association between Moraxella bovoculi and Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis in dairy calves. Vet Microbiol. 2013;164:108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dickey AM, Schuller G, Loy JD, Clawson ML. Whole genome sequencing of Moraxella bovoculi reveals high genetic diversity and evidence for interspecies recombination at multiple loci. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0209113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dickey AM, Loy JD, Bono JL, Smith TP, Apley MD, et al. Large genomic differences between Moraxella bovoculi isolates acquired from the eyes of cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis versus the deep nasopharynx of asymptomatic cattle. Vet Res. 2016;47:31. doi: 10.1186/s13567-016-0316-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hille M, Dickey A, Robbins K, Clawson ML, Loy JD. Rapid differentiation of Moraxella bovoculi genotypes 1 and 2 using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry profiles. J Microbiol Methods. 2020;173:105942. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meekins JM, Apley MD, Lubbers B, Peddireddi L, Rankin AJ. Evaluation of conjunctival bacterial flora in a herd of goats in the midwestern United States. Vet Ophthalmol. 2017;20:40–45. doi: 10.1111/vop.12348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tryland M, Das Neves CG, Sunde M, Mork T. Cervid herpesvirus 2, the primary agent in an outbreak of infectious keratoconjunctivitis in semidomesticated reindeer. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:3707–3713. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01198-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Riggio MP, Lennon A, Taylor DJ, Bennett D. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with canine periodontal disease. Vet Microbiol. 2011;150:394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Angelos JA, Ball LM, Hess JF. Identification and characterization of complete RTX operons in Moraxella bovoculi and Moraxella ovis . Vet Microbiol. 2007;125:73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Angelos JA, Hess JF, George LW. Cloning and characterization of a Moraxella bovis cytotoxin gene. Am J Vet Res. 2001;62:1222–1228. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moore LJ, Rutter JM. Attachment of Moraxella bovis to calf corneal cells and inhibition by antiserum. Aust Vet J. 1989;66:39–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1989.tb03012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ruehl WW, Marrs C, Beard MK, Shokooki V, Hinojoza JR, et al. Q pili enhance the attachment of Moraxella bovis to bovine corneas in vitro . Mol Microbiol. 1993;7:285–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Annuar BO, Wilcox GE. Adherence of Moraxella bovis to cell cultures of bovine origin. Res Vet Sci. 1985;39:241–246. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)31752-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moore LJ, Lepper AW. A unified serotyping scheme for Moraxella bovis . Vet Microbiol. 1991;29:75–83. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(91)90111-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marrs CF, Ruehl WW, Schoolnik GK, Falkow S. Pilin-gene phase variation of Moraxella bovis is caused by an inversion of the pilin genes. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:3032–3039. doi: 10.1128/JB.170.7.3032-3039.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lepper AW, Atwell JL, Lehrbach PR, Schwartzkoff CL, Egerton JR, et al. The protective efficacy of cloned Moraxella bovis pili in monovalent and multivalent vaccine formulations against experimentally induced infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK) Vet Microbiol. 1995;45:129–138. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(94)00123-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Angelos JA, Ball LM. Differentiation of Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov. from other coccoid moraxellae by the use of polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis of amplified DNA. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007;19:532–534. doi: 10.1177/104063870701900511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Calcutt MJ, Foecking MF, Martin NT, Mhlanga-Mutangadura T, Reilly TJ. Draft genome sequence of Moraxella bovoculi strain 237T (ATCC BAA-1259T) isolated from a calf with infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis. Genome Announc. 2014;2 doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00612-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Atwell JL, Tennent JM, Lepper AW, Elleman TC. Characterization of pilin genes from seven serologically defined prototype strains of Moraxella bovis . J Bacteriol. 1994;176:4875–4882. doi: 10.1128/JB.176.16.4875-4882.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fulks KA, Marrs CF, Stevens SP, Green MR. Sequence analysis of the inversion region containing the pilin genes of Moraxella bovis . J Bacteriol. 1990;172:310–316. doi: 10.1128/JB.172.1.310-316.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Luke NR, Jurcisek JA, Bakaletz LO, Campagnari AA. Contribution of Moraxella catarrhalis type IV pili to nasopharyngeal colonization and biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2007;75:5559–5564. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00946-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Prieto C, Serra DO, Martina P, Jacobs M, Bosch A, et al. Evaluation of biofilm-forming capacity of Moraxella bovis, the primary causative agent of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Vet Microbiol. 2013;166:504–515. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ely VL, Vargas AC, Costa MM, Oliveira HP, Potter L, et al. Moraxella bovis, Moraxella ovis and Moraxella bovoculi: biofilm formation and lysozyme activity. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;126:369–376. doi: 10.1111/jam.14086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ruehl WW, Marrs CF, George L, Banks SJ, Schoolnik GK. Infection rates, disease frequency, pilin gene rearrangement, and pilin expression in calves inoculated with Moraxella bovis pilin-specific isogenic variants. Am J Vet Res. 1993;54:248–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



