Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Medical Microbiology
. 2021 Jan 6;70(2):001293. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001293

Relatedness of type IV pilin PilA amongst geographically diverse Moraxella bovoculi isolated from cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis

John A Angelos 1,*, Kristin A Clothier 2, Regina L Agulto 1, Boguslav Mandzyuk 1, Morten Tryland 3
PMCID: PMC8131017  PMID: 33404383

Abstract

Introduction

Moraxella bovoculi is frequently isolated from the eyes of cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK; pinkeye). As with M. bovis, which has been causally linked to IBK, M. bovoculi expresses an RTX (repeats in the structural toxin) cytotoxin that is related to M. bovis cytotoxin. Pilin, another pathogenic factor in M. bovis , is required for corneal attachment. Seven antigenically distinct pilin serogroups have been described in M. bovis .

Hypothesis/Gap Statement

Multiple different serogroups exist amongst type IV pilin encoded by M. bovis , however, it is not known whether M. bovoculi exhibits a similar degree of diversity in type IV pilin that it encodes.

Aim

This study was done to characterize a structural pilin (PilA) encoded by M. bovoculi isolated from cases of IBK to determine if diversity exists amongst PilA sequences.

Methodology

Ninety-four isolates of M. bovoculi collected between 2002 and 2017 from 23 counties throughout California and from five counties in four other Western states were evaluated.

Results

DNA sequencing and determination of deduced amino acid sequences revealed ten (designated groups A through J) unique PilA sequences that were ~96.1–99.3 % identical. Pilin groups A and C matched previously reported putative PilA sequences from M. bovoculi isolated from IBK-affected cattle in the USA (Virginia, Nebraska, and Kansas) and Asia (Kazakhstan). The ten pilin sequences identified were only ~74–76 % identical to deduced amino acid sequences of putative pilin proteins identified from the previously reported whole-genome sequences of M. bovoculi derived from deep nasopharyngeal swabs of IBK-asymptomatic cattle.

Conclusions

Compared to the diversity reported between structural pilin proteins amongst different serogroups of M. bovis , M. bovoculi PilA from geographically diverse isolates derived from IBK-affected cattle are more conserved.

Keywords: infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis, Moraxella bovis, Moraxella bovoculi, pilin, PilA, pinkeye

Data Summary

Accession numbers for all supporting sequence data are provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of GenBank Accession numbers for PilA and ISR sequences in 94 isolates of M. bovoculi isolated from cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis

GenBank PilA Accession No.

GenBank ISR Accession No.

Collected by*

Collection year

PilA group

Isolate

County locations in the USA

MT333648

MT353781

JAA

2002

A

8342

Yuba County, CA

MT333649

MT353782

JAA

2002

A

6170

Yuba County, CA

MT333650

MT353783

JAA

2002

A

4794

Yuba County, CA

MT333651

MT353784

JAA

2002

A

4787

Yuba County, CA

MT333652

MT353785

JAA

2002

A

4786

Yuba County, CA

MT333653

MT353786

JAA

2002

F

4785

Yuba County, CA

MT333654

MT353787

JAA

2002

A

4773

Yuba County, CA

MT333655

MT353788

JAA

2002

A

2473

Yuba County, CA

MT333656

MT353789

JAA

2002

B

2470–1

Yuba County, CA

MT333657

MT353790

JAA

2002

A

2467

Yuba County, CA

MT333658

MT353791

JAA

2002

I

380

Yuba County, CA

MT333659

MT353792

JAA

2002

A

376

Yuba County, CA

MT333660

MT353793

JAA

2002

A

371

Yuba County, CA

MT333661

MT353794

JAA

2002

A

317

Yuba County, CA

MT333662

MT353795

JAA

2002

A

237

Yuba County, CA

MT333663

MT353796

JAA

2006

B

153R

Yuba County, CA

MT333664

MT353797

JAA

2006

B

151RB

Yuba County, CA

MT333665

MT353798

JAA

2008

B

130LB

Yuba County, CA

MT333666

MT353799

JAA

2008

B

112R

Yuba County, CA

MT333667

MT353800

JAA

2006

A

111L

Yuba County, CA

MT333668

MT353801

JAA

2007

B

108RB

Yuba County, CA

MT333669

MT353802

JAA

2007

A

108LB

Yuba County, CA

MT333670

MT353803

JAA

2008

C

105L

Yuba County, CA

MT333671

MT353804

JAA

2006

C

78LB

Yuba County, CA

MT333672

MT353805

JAA

2007

B

67LB

Yuba County, CA

MT333673

MT353806

KAC

2017

E

60

Kings County, CA

MT333674

MT353807

JAA

2007

A

59RB

Yuba County, CA

MT333675

MT353808

JAA

2007

B

59LB

Yuba County, CA

MT333676

MT353809

KAC

2017

A

59

Franklin County, ID

MT333677

MT353810

KAC

2016

H

58

Tulare County, CA

MT333678

MT353811

KAC

2016

D

57

Kern County, CA

MT333679

MT353812

KAC

2016

A

56

Tulare County, CA

MT333680

MT353813

KAC

2017

A

55

Kings County, CA

MT333681

MT353814

KAC

2017

C

54

Kern County, CA

MT333682

MT353815

KAC

2017

A

53

Tulare County, CA

MT333683

MT353816

KAC

2013

C

51

Yolo County, CA

MT333684

MT353817

KAC

2017

B

50

Jerome County, ID

MT333685

MT353818

KAC

2017

B

49

Stanislaus County, CA

MT333686

MT353819

KAC

2017

A

48

Placer County, CA

MT333687

MT353820

KAC

2017

A

47

Humboldt County, CA

MT333688

MT353821

JAA

2007

C

46L

Yuba County, CA

MT333689

MT353822

KAC

2011

A

46

Merced County, CA

MT333690

MT353823

KAC

2011

A

45

Stanislaus County, CA

MT333691

MT353824

KAC

2011

A

44

Modoc County, CA

MT333692

MT353825

KAC

2011

A

43

Siskiyou County, CA

MT333693

MT353826

KAC

2011

E

42

Sonoma County, CA

MT333694

MT353827

JAA

2008

A

41LB

Yuba County, CA

MT333695

MT353828

KAC

2011

B

41

San Joaquin County, CA

MT333696

MT353829

KAC

2012

A

40

Merced County, CA

MT333697

MT353830

KAC

2011

A

39

Yuba County, CA

MT333698

MT353831

KAC

2013

B

38

Marin County, CA

MT333699

MT353832

KAC

2014

D

37

Lassen County, CA

MT333700

MT353833

KAC

2014

A

36

Humboldt County, CA

MT333701

MT353834

KAC

2012

C

35

Sonoma County, CA

MT333702

MT353835

KAC

2012

B

34

Trinity County, CA

MT333703

MT353836

JAA

2006

B

33RB

Yuba County, CA

MT333704

MT353837

KAC

2013

C

33

Yuba County, CA

MT333705

MT353838

KAC

2012

C

32

Modoc County, CA

MT333706

MT353839

JAA

2008

A

31L

Yuba County, CA

MT333707

MT353840

KAC

2013

A

31

Yavapai County, AZ

MT333708

MT353841

JAA

2006

B

30LB

Yuba County, CA

MT333709

MT353842

KAC

2013

A

30

El Dorado County, CA

MT333710

MT353843

JAA

2007

B

29RB

Yuba County, CA

MT333711

MT353844

KAC

2013

A

29

Merced County, CA

MT333712

MT353845

KAC

2012

A

28

Chaves County, NM

MT333713

MT353846

KAC

2012

J

27

Merced County, CA

MT333714

MT353847

JAA

2007

B

26RB

Yuba County, CA

MT333715

MT353848

KAC

2013

A

26

Mendocino County, CA

MT333716

MT353849

KAC

2012

C

25

Marin County, CA

MT333717

MT353850

KAC

2013

A

24

Marin County, CA

MT333718

MT353851

KAC

2017

A

23

Modoc County, CA

MT333719

MT353852

KAC

2014

A

22

San Bernardino County, CA

MT333720

MT353853

KAC

2017

A

21

Kern County, CA

MT333721

MT353854

KAC

2015

A

20

Fresno County, CA

MT333722

MT353855

KAC

2017

A

19

Yolo County, CA

MT333723

MT353856

JAA

2006

B

18LB

Yuba County, CA

MT333724

MT353857

KAC

2015

A

18

Plumas County, CA

MT333725

MT353858

KAC

2015

C

17

Calaveras County, CA

MT333726

MT353859

KAC

2015

G

16

Yolo County, CA

MT333727

MT353860

KAC

2015

C

15

Sonoma County, CA

MT333728

MT353861

KAC

2016

D

14

Merced County, CA

MT333729

MT353862

KAC

2016

D

13

Merced County, CA

MT333730

MT353863

KAC

2015

A

12

Humboldt County, CA

MT333731

MT353864

KAC

2017

D

11

Merced County, CA

MT333732

MT353865

KAC

2008

C

10

Merced County, CA

MT333733

MT353866

KAC

2008

A

9

Sonoma County, CA

MT333734

MT353867

KAC

2008

A

8

Merced County, CA

MT333735

MT353868

KAC

2009

B

7

Sacramento County, CA

MT333736

MT353869

KAC

2009

C

6

Sonoma County, CA

MT333737

MT353870

KAC

2009

A

5

Merced County, CA

MT333738

MT353871

KAC

2009

A

4

Merced County, CA

MT333739

MT353872

KAC

2010

C

3

Stanislaus County, CA

MT333740

MT353873

KAC

2009

A

2

Merced County, CA

MT333741

MT353874

KAC

2010

A

1

Washoe County, NV

*JAA: John A. Angelos; KAC: Kristin A. Clothier

Impact Statement.

Pilin (PilA) from M. bovoculi is conserved amongst geographically diverse isolates derived from cattle with IBK and displays considerably less variability amongst isolates compared to M. bovis pilins from different M. bovis serogroups. The significance of M. bovoculi pilin as it relates to the pathogenesis of IBK is presently unknown.

Introduction

Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK; pinkeye) is the most common eye disease of cattle and is characterized by the presence of corneal ulceration, corneal oedema, conjunctivitis, and eye pain. First reported in 2007 [1], M. bovoculi is now more frequently isolated from eyes of cattle affected with IBK compared to M. bovis [2, 3]. While Koch’s postulates were previously established for M. bovis and IBK [4], a direct link between the type strain of M. bovoculi (no. 237) and corneal ulceration in a scarification model of infection in dairy calves could not be established [5]. Two distinct genotypes have been characterized in M. bovoculi ; genotype 1 is associated with IBK-affected cattle while genotype 2 is associated with IBK-asymptomatic cattle [6, 7]. Recent studies have also identified different matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) profiles between the two genotypes [8].

From reports of isolations of M. bovoculi in different parts of the world, it is known that this organism has widespread geographic distribution amongst cattle as well as other ruminant [9, 10] and non-ruminant [11] species. One specific pathogenic factor that may be important in the capacity for M. bovoculi to contribute to the pathogenesis of IBK is an RTX (repeats in the structural toxin) toxin [12] that has been shown to be similar to the M. bovis RTX toxin (cytotoxin) [13]. The role of this RTX toxin in the pathogenesis of M. bovoculi is not known and some genotype 1 strains have been identified that do not possess RTX toxin genes [6, 7].

In addition to cytotoxin, the pathogenesis of M. bovis involves expression of pili that allow it to adhere to corneal epithelial cells [14–16]. For M. bovis it is thought that the presence of multiple M. bovis pilus serogroups [17] coupled with pilin gene inversions [18] increases antigenic variability and accounts for antigenic switching that may allow M. bovis to evade a host’s immune response [19].

The purpose of this study was to characterize PilA from geographically diverse Western USA isolates of M. bovoculi from IBK-affected cattle. We also sought to compare deduced pilin amino acid sequences from these Western USA isolates with pilin-related sequences from isolates of M. bovoculi whose full-genome sequences were previously submitted to GenBank, pilin-related sequences from M. ovis, and previously defined pilins from characterized serogroups of M. bovis .

Methods

Bacterial isolate source and identification

A total of 94 isolates of M. bovoculi from cases of IBK in cattle from 28 counties were used for this study (see Table 1). Bacterial isolates were cultured from ocular swabs from eyes of cattle with IBK that had been collected by one of the authors (JAA), or submitted to the California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory (CAHFS), Davis, CA and provided by one of the authors (KAC). Isolates (n=35) collected by JAA were from beef calves at the University of California Sierra Foothills Research and Extension Center, Brown’s Valley, Yuba County, CA (SFREC) during 2002 (n=5), 2006 (n=7), 2007 (n=8) and 2008 (n=5), or from IBK-affected dairy calves at a commercial dairy in Yuba County, CA during 2002 (n=10). Isolates provided by KAC (n=59) originated from cattle in 23 California counties (n=54), 2 Idaho counties (n=2), Arizona (n=1), Nevada (n=1), and New Mexico (n=1) during 2008–2017. Amongst the SFREC isolates collected during 2008, two isolates originated from each of two steers that had developed a corneal ulcer associated with IBK in a left eye, recovered and then developed an ulcer associated with IBK in the right eye 4–10 weeks later. One isolate included in this study from JAA ( M. bovoculi 237) is the type strain for the species [1].

Isolates were confirmed as M. bovoculi on the basis of biochemical testing as well as by blast analysis against the GenBank database of an amplified and sequenced ribosomal RNA gene (partial 16S ribosomal RNA gene and 16 S-23S ribosomal RNA intergenic spacer; ISR) (details provided below). A subset of isolates collected by one of the authors (KAC) was also subject to analysis by MALDI-TOF testing (see below). Ocular swabs were streaked onto trypticase soy agar with 0.5 % sheep blood plates (SBA) and incubated at 35 °C. Colonies with morphology consistent with Moraxella spp. after 24–48 h of incubation were subcultured for further characterization. Isolates that were catalase-positive, oxidase-positive, Gram-negative coccobacilli, negative for carbohydrate fermentation, able to reduce nitrate, negative for casein hydrolysis, and able to deaminate phenylalanine were characterized as M. bovoculi . Isolates were stored frozen at −70 °C until use.

The isolates provided by KAC (n=59) were also subject to MALDI-TOF testing by incubating isolates overnight on SBA at 35 °C in a 5–10 % CO2 atmosphere. Isolates were tested according to the MALDI-TOF instrument manufacturer’s recommended procedure for the direct smear method using α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (Bruker Daltronics, Billerica, MA, USA), and subjected to automatic detection in a positive linear mode between 2 kDa and 20 kDa m/hz, with a laser frequency of 60 Hz (Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS, Bruker Daltronics). The system was calibrated for reference masses of 3637–16 952 Da using the manufacturer’s supplied bacterial test standard. Up to 240 spectrum profiles were obtained per colony, and all colonies were tested in duplicate. Bacterial identifications were determined using commercial software and the database provided by the manufacturer (Compass, 4.1, Bruker Daltronics). Identity scores >2.0 were considered very good to the genus and species level per the manufacturer’s guidelines.

Genomic DNA and PCR

M. bovoculi isolates were thawed, streaked onto 5 % SBA, and incubated at 35 °C for 18–20 h. Genomic DNA was purified from whole bacteria using a commercial kit (DNEasy kit; Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). Further confirmation of all isolates as M. bovoculi was made by blast analysis of an amplified and sequenced ribosomal RNA gene (partial 16S ribosomal RNA gene and 16 S-23S ribosomal RNA intergenic spacer; ISR) against the GenBank database. This region was amplified from genomic DNA with primers ISRdown (5′-GTG AAG TCG TAA CAA GGT AGC CGT-3′) and ISRup (5′-ACC GAC GCT TAT CGC AGG CTA TCA-3′) using previously described PCR conditions [20]; all isolates had high % identify (99.6–100 %) to ISR sequences of M. bovoculi that were previously submitted to the GenBank database.

The pilA gene was amplified from genomic DNA using primers Mbovoc_Pilin_Dn (5′-GTG GGG TTA CAT AAA TAT AAA GA-3′) and Mbovoc_PilinUp3 (5′-GAT TAA TCA AAC CTT CAA ACA C-3′). These primers were designed to amplify a 685 bp fragment that spanned a type IV pilin (PilA) that was identified in the draft genome sequence of M. bovoculi 237 (GenBank accession no. AOMT01000037.1; locus_tag: MBO_08958; COG4969 Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA; GenBank accession no. KDN24455 and [21]). These primers were located from 88 base pairs upstream of an ATG start codon to 138 base pairs downstream of a TAG stop codon. The PCR conditions were an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 44 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 2 min, and a final incubation at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were purified (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit, Qiagen) and sequenced at the UC Davis DNA Sequencing Laboratory (Davis, CA, USA). Final pilA and ISR gene sequences were determined from overlapping sequences assembled with DNA sequence analysis software (Sequencher 5.4.6, Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbour, MI, USA).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The ISR and pilA nucleotide sequence accession numbers for the 94 M . bovoculi evaluated for this study are MT353781-MT353874 (ISR sequences) and MT333648-MT333741 (pilA sequences). For comparing PilA sequences from this set of M. bovoculi isolates with previously reported pilin-related sequences in M. bovis , M. bovoculi and M. ovis , the deduced amino acid sequence of pilin- or PilA-related sequences for M. bovis , M. bovoculi and M. ovis were downloaded from the GenBank database. Accession numbers of sequences used for these comparisons are provided in Table 2.

Table 2.

Source information and GenBank accession nos. for M. bovis, M. bovoculi and M. ovis pilin-related proteins

Description

Accession no.

Species

Strain

Length (aa)

Notes

prepilin

L32969

bovis

3W07

158

source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup B

prepilin

L32965

bovis

218R

158

source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup F

pilin; Tfp pilus assembly protein PilE

AAA53087

bovis

Dalton 2d

156

source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup C

prepilin; Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA

AAA53559

bovis

FL462

157

source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup G

prepilin; Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA

AAA53562

bovis

H358CS

159

source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup D

prepilin

L32968

bovis

S276R

160

source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup A

prepilin; Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA

AAA53561

bovis

TAT849

159

source: bovine pinkeye; Serogroup E

type IV pilin PilA

KDN24455

bovoculi

237

152

source: bovine pinkeye; USA: California; culture collection: ATCC: BAA-1259

hypothetical protein AAX06_02925; pilin

AKG07295

bovoculi

22 581

156

source: bovine deep nasopharyngeal swab (asymptomatic animal); USA:Missouri

hypothetical protein AAX05_08035; pilin

AKG10099

bovoculi

23 343

156

source: bovine deep nasopharyngeal swab (asymptomatic animal); USA: Tennessee

hypothetical protein AAX07_08580; pilin

AKG12021

bovoculi

28 389

156

source: bovine deep nasopharyngeal swab (asymptomatic animal); USA: Kentucky

hypothetical protein AAX11_08125; pilin

AKG13989

bovoculi

33 362

156

source: bovine deep nasopharyngeal swab (asymptomatic animal); USA: Kansas

hypothetical protein AAX08_01970; Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA

AKG14945

bovoculi

57 922

152

source: bovine pinkeye; USA: Kansas

hypothetical protein AAX09_01900

AKG18359

bovoculi

58 069

152

source: bovine pinkeye; USA: Nebraska

prepilin-type N-terminal cleavage/methylation domain-containing protein; Tfp pilus assembly protein, major pilin PilA

AKG16627

bovoculi

58 086

152

source: bovine pinkeye; USA: Virginia

prepilin-type N-terminal cleavage/methylation domain-containing protein

NSM11559

bovoculi

KZ-1

152

source: bovine eye; country of origin: Kazakhstan: Akmola region

pilin

WP_063514484

ovis

156

pilin

WP_112744298

ovis

156

hypothetical protein MOVS_07875; pilin

ANB91903

ovis

199/55

156

source: bovine pinkeye; country of origin: Norway; culture collection: ATCC: 33 078

Two subunits pilin

SPX85670

ovis

NCTC11019

156

contig: ERS1826247SCcontig000017

Two subunits pilin

STY87629

ovis

NCTC11227

156

contig: ERS1247844SCcontig000001

Two subunits pilin

STZ05528

ovis

NCTC11969

156

contig: 58901_D01158901_D01558901_D012

Pilin sequence comparisons

The 94 pilA gene sequences were compared using a Muscle alignment (version 3.8.425 by Robert C. Edgar; Geneious Prime 2020.1.2). The deduced amino acid sequences of the 94 pilin sequences were aligned and compared with one another and to previously reported M. bovis , M. ovis and M. bovoculi pilin sequences (Table 2). Alignments were performed using Clustal Omega fast clustering (mBed algorithm in Geneious Prime 2020.1.2). Creation of a neighbour-joining consensus phylogenetic tree was performed using the Geneious Tree Builder (Jukes-Cantor genetic distance model; resampling: bootstrapping with 1000 replicates).

Results

DNA and deduced amino acid sequences of M. bovoculi pilin

A 459 bp ORF was identified in the sequenced amplicons of all 94 M . bovoculi isolates; 20 of these ORFs were unique. The deduced amino acid sequences of these 20 ORFs encoded ten unique PilA sequences that were designated M. bovoculi PilA groups A through J (Fig. 1). The number of isolates in these groups were 49, 19, 14, 5 and 2 for PilA groups A, B, C, D and E, respectively; one isolate each represented PilA groups F through J. The most frequently identified PilA sequence in this collection of samples was group A, which was identified in 22 of the 28 counties from which the 94 isolates originated (Table 3).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Alignment of the ten M . bovoculi PilA groups A–J deduced amino acid sequences (sequences 1, 6–8 and 10–15) identified in 94 M. bovoculi isolates derived from cattle with IBK that were evaluated for this study and previously reported M. bovoculi and M. ovis pilin-related sequences. Sequences 16–19 were from deep nasopharyngeal swabs of cattle without IBK that were first reported in [7]. Sequence 2 is derived from the whole-genome sequence of the type strain of M. bovoculi . Previously reported M. ovis pilin-related sequences 20–25 showed the most similarity to pilin-related sequences of M. bovoculi that were reported from deep nasopharyngeal swabs of IBK-asymptomatic cattle. Alignment created using Geneious version 2020.1 created by Biomatters; available from https://www.geneious.com.

Table 3.

Summary of year and county distribution of ten PilA groups identified in 94 isolates of M. bovoculi isolated from the eyes of cattle with IBK. Deduced amino acid sequences for each PilA group and associated GenBank accession numbers are shown below

PilA group∗

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

No. of isolates (no. of unique pilA DNA sequences)†

49 (6)

19 (1)

14 (5)

5 (1)

2 (2)

1

1

1

1

1

Year(s) isolated

2002; 2006; 2007; 2008; 2009; 2010; 2011; 2012; 2013; 2014; 2015; 2016; 2017

2002; 2006; 2007; 2008; 2009; 2011; 2012; 2013; 2017

2006; 2007; 2008; 2009; 2010; 2012; 2013; 2015; 2017

2014; 2016; 2017

2011; 2017

2002

2015

2016

2002

2012

Source county‡

Chaves (NM); El Dorado; Franklin (ID); Fresno; Humboldt; Kern; Kings; Marin; Mendocino; Merced; Modoc; Placer; Plumas; San Bernardino; Siskiyou; Sonoma; Stanislaus; Tulare; Washoe (NV); Yavapai (AZ); Yolo; Yuba

Jerome (ID); Marin; Sacramento; San Joaquin; Stanislaus; Trinity; Yuba

Calaveras; Kern; Marin; Merced; Modoc; Sonoma; Stanislaus; Yolo; Yuba

Lassen; Kern; Merced

Sonoma;

Kings

Yuba

Yolo

Tulare

Yuba

Merced

­Inline graphic

Genbank accession numbers: Group A (MT333648; MT333649; MT333650; MT333651; MT333652; MT333654; MT333655; MT333657; MT333659; MT333660; MT333661; MT333662; MT333667; MT333669; MT333674; MT333694; MT333706; MT333733; MT333734; MT333737; MT333738; MT333740; MT333741; MT333689; MT333690; MT333691; MT333692; MT333697; MT333696; MT333712; MT333707; MT333709; MT333711; MT333715; MT333717; MT333700; MT333719; MT333721; MT333724; MT333730; MT333679; MT333676; MT333680; MT333682; MT333686; MT333687; MT333718; MT333720; MT333722); Group B (MT333656; MT333663; MT333664; MT333703; MT333708; MT333723; MT333668; MT333672; MT333675; MT333710; MT333714; MT333665; MT333666; MT333735; MT333695; MT333702; MT333698; MT333684; MT333685); Group C (MT333671; MT333688; MT333670; MT333732; MT333736; MT333739; MT333701; MT333705; MT333716; MT333683; MT333704; MT333725; MT333727; MT333681); Group D (MT333699; MT333678; MT333728; MT333729; MT333731); Group E (MT333693; MT333673); Group F (MT333653); Group G (MT333726); Group H (MT333677); Group I (MT333658); Group J (MT333713). Isolates corresponding to accession numbers MT333669 (PilA group A) and MT333668 (PilA group B) were isolated from the same calf (but different IBK-affected eyes) on 5-26-2007 and 6-25-2007, respectively. Isolates corresponding to accession numbers MT333675 (PilA group B) and MT333674 (PilA group A) were isolated from the same calf (but different IBK-affected eyes) on 6-5-2007 and 8-17-2007, respectively.

‡Counties located in California except where indicated.

The deduced amino acid sequences of these ten unique PilA sequences shared a high degree of sequence similarity with overall identical sites and pairwise identity of 92.8 and 98.1 %, respectively. Differences in deduced amino acid sequences between the ten groups included four conservative and eight radical amino acid replacements. At residue 61, the sequences were equally divided between those with serine versus asparagine residues. In one of the pairs of SFREC isolates from 2008 that originated from a single animal, one exhibited a PilA group A sequence (accession MT333669) while the second obtained from the opposite eye approximately 4 weeks later exhibited a group B sequence (MT333668). In the second pair of two isolates that originated from a single animal, the initial isolate exhibited a PilA group B sequence (accession MT333675), while the second isolate obtained from the opposite eye approximately 10 weeks later exhibited a PilA group A sequence (accession MT333674).

Comparisons with previously reported M. bovoculi, M. ovis and M. bovis pilin-related sequences

Previously reported pilin-related sequences in M. bovoculi from IBK-affected cattle in Kansas (strain 57922), Virginia (strain 58086) and Kazakhstan (strain KZ-1) (respective GenBank accession nos.: AKG14945, AKG16627 and NSM11559) and the PilA protein from the type strain of M. bovoculi (237; KDN24455) were identical to the PilA group A deduced amino acid sequence. A previously reported hypothetical protein from a Nebraska isolate of M. bovoculi (strain 58069) from an IBK-affected cow (GenBank accession no.: AKG18359) was identical to the PilA group C deduced amino acid sequence. See Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Similarity matrix showing percent identities between sequences depicted in Fig. 1 (created using Geneious version 2020.1 created by Biomatters; available from https://www.geneious.com).

Comparisons of the PilA groups A–J deduced amino acid sequences with putative pilin deduced amino acid sequences that were identified in M. bovoculi from deep nasopharyngeal swabs of cattle that did not have IBK ( M. bovoculi strains 22 581, 23 343, 28 389 and 33 362 [7] with respective GenBank accession nos.: AKG07295, AKG10099, AKG12021 and AKG13989) revealed 74.3–75.7 % identity between sequence pairs (Fig. 2). Comparisons between previously reported M. ovis pilin sequences (GenBank accession nos.: WP_063514484, WP_112744298, ANB91903, SPX85670, STY87629 and STZ05528) and M. bovoculi PilA groups A–J showed approximately 75 % identity. These six M . ovis sequences exhibited 96.8–97.4 % identity to pilin-related sequences from M. bovoculi from deep nasopharyngeal swabs of IBK-asymptomatic cattle (strains 22 581, 23 343, 28 389 and 33 362 with respective GenBank accession nos.: AKG07295, AKG10099, AKG12021 and AKG13989) (Fig. 2).

Amongst the deduced pilin amino acid sequences for the previously reported eight M . bovis pilin serogroups A, B, C, D, E, F and G (GenBank accession nos.: L32968 (serogroup A); L32969 (serogroup B); AAA53087 (serogroup C); AAA53562 (serogroup D); AAA53561 (serogroup E); L32965 (serogroup F); and AAA53559 (serogroup G) [22]) there was 61.3–78.1 % identity (Fig. 2). The percent identity between the deduced amino acid sequence of these M. bovis pilin serogroup sequences and M. bovoculi PilA group A–J sequences ranged from 29.5–32.3 %. A phylogenetic tree depicting relationships between the pilin sequences listed in Table 1 and the ten M . bovoculi PilA groups identified in this study showed distinct clustering of pilin-deduced amino acid sequences from seven defined M. bovis serogroups, M. bovoculi isolated from cattle with IBK, M. ovis and M. bovoculi isolated from the nasopharynx of cattle without IBK (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Unrooted neighbour-joining consensus tree depicting relationships between M. bovoculi PilA groups A–J characterized from 94 M . bovoculi isolates from cattle with IBK in the Western USA and pilin-related deduced amino acid sequences previously reported in M. bovoculi from cattle with IBK (green box), M. ovis (yellow box) and M. bovis (grey box). Blue box indicates previously characterized M. bovoculi that were isolated from the nasopharynx of IBK-asymptomatic cattle [7]. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Bar, 0.2 substitutions per site (Geneious version 2020.1 created by Biomatters; https://www.geneious.com).

Discussion

In this study we found ten unique structural pilin (PilA)-deduced amino acid sequences amongst a collection of M. bovoculi that had been isolated from eyes of IBK-affected cattle throughout California and four other Western states (Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico and Arizona). Given the limited sample size and geographic distribution of isolates that we examined, however, it is impossible to say how likely or not it is that more PilA groups might exist amongst M. bovoculi . Since two of these PilA group sequences (A and C) matched PilA sequences in M. bovoculi from IBK-affected cattle from other locations in the USA (Kansas, Nebraska, Virginia) and Asia (Akmola region of Kazakhstan), it is possible that the PilA groups identified in this study are representative of M. bovoculi PilA sequences in general. Of the ten PilA groups that we identified, three (A, B and C) were the most widely distributed over geography and time, however, it is likely that a larger sample size would have revealed additional locations of these less well-represented PilA groups.

Among the ten PilA groups that were characterized in this study population, the overall degree of difference was very small compared to the seven M . bovis serogroups that have been characterized [17, 22]. Because M. bovoculi isolates that have been examined thus far via whole-genome sequencing have not displayed evidence for an I/Q pilin type phase shift [6] that was described in M. bovis [18, 23], it seems likely that any additional PilA group types that may be identified in the future will probably exhibit a relatively low degree of variability from one another as compared to the variability that is observed in M. bovis exhibiting different pilin serogroups.

It is currently not known whether or not PilA expression in M. bovoculi is a prerequisite for establishing colonization of the ocular surface. While published studies thus far have not supported a causal role for at least one strain of M. bovoculi in IBK [5], positive correlations have been reported between clinical signs of IBK and the presence of M. bovoculi [2, 3]. This suggests that M. bovoculi attachment to bovine ocular surfaces may be necessary for it to survive in/around ocular mucosal surfaces. If true, given what is known about the general role for pilins in host attachment and survival, it is logical to conclude that pilin probably does play a role in the ability of M. bovoculi to exist on ocular surfaces. Previous studies in other Moraxella species demonstrated that pilin is important for colonization and biofilm formation [24, 25] and a recent study demonstrated that M. bovoculi forms biofilms [26]. This suggests that pilin expression in M. bovoculi is likely involved in its ability to colonize the bovine eye. The fact that a putative PilA protein from M. bovoculi associated with the nasopharynx of IBK-asymptomatic cattle in Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky and Kansas [7] and PilA from M. bovoculi from IBK-affected cattle exhibit only ~75 % identity between deduced amino acid sequences raises the possibility that differences in pilin sequence allow survival on different mucosal sites (for example, ocular surface versus nasopharynx).

Whether or not differences between the 10 PilA groups that we identified have any bearing on evasion of a host immune response during clinical IBK associated with the presence of M. bovoculi remains to be determined. For M. bovis strain Epp63 it is known that recombination events involving pilin-expressing genes allow different forms of pilin to be expressed [18], and that these different forms of pilin are associated with colonization versus maintenance of infection [27]. In the population of M. bovoculi isolates that we examined for this study we identified two PilA groups in each of the two animals (PilA groups A and B) where IBK developed in different eyes over a period of weeks. In one animal a PilA group A isolate was followed by identification of a PilA group B isolate, while in the other animal in the same herd the initial isolate was a PilA group B isolate followed by a group A isolate. Additional studies are needed to determine whether cattle develop immune responses to M. bovoculi pilin during ocular infections and whether the sorts of PilA group changes that we observed were reflective of host immune selection or just pure coincidence.

Conclusion

M. bovoculi PilA deduced amino acid sequences exhibit some diversity, however, overall, PilA sequences are relatively conserved across geographically diverse isolates from cattle with IBK and much more conserved relative to M. bovis pilin serogroups. The exact role that M. bovoculi PilA might play in the ability of M. bovoculi to exist in/around bovine ocular tissues remains to be determined.

Funding information

This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Animal Health project 1009855.

Author contributions

J.A. conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, resources, data curation, writing – original draft preparation, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding; K.C. conceptualization, resources, writing – review and editing, funding; R.A. investigation, writing – review and editing; B.M. investigation, writing – review and editing; M.T. conceptualization, writing – review and editing, funding.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: IBK, infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; ORF, open reading frame; SBA, sheep blood agar plate; SFREC, Sierra Foothills Research and Extension Center.

References

  • 1.Angelos JA, Spinks PQ, Ball LM, George LW. Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov., isolated from calves with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:789–795. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64333-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Loy JD, Brodersen BW. Moraxella spp. isolated from field outbreaks of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis: a retrospective study of case submissions from 2010 to 2013. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2014;26:761–768. doi: 10.1177/1040638714551403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schnee C, Heller M, Schubert E, Sachse K. Point prevalence of infection with Mycoplasma bovoculi and Moraxella spp. in cattle at different stages of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Vet J. 2015;203:92–96. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Henson JB, Grumbles LC. Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. I. etiology. Am J Vet Res. 1960;21:761–766. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gould S, Dewell R, Tofflemire K, Whitley RD, Millman ST, et al. Randomized blinded challenge study to assess association between Moraxella bovoculi and Infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis in dairy calves. Vet Microbiol. 2013;164:108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dickey AM, Schuller G, Loy JD, Clawson ML. Whole genome sequencing of Moraxella bovoculi reveals high genetic diversity and evidence for interspecies recombination at multiple loci. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0209113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dickey AM, Loy JD, Bono JL, Smith TP, Apley MD, et al. Large genomic differences between Moraxella bovoculi isolates acquired from the eyes of cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis versus the deep nasopharynx of asymptomatic cattle. Vet Res. 2016;47:31. doi: 10.1186/s13567-016-0316-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hille M, Dickey A, Robbins K, Clawson ML, Loy JD. Rapid differentiation of Moraxella bovoculi genotypes 1 and 2 using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry profiles. J Microbiol Methods. 2020;173:105942. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meekins JM, Apley MD, Lubbers B, Peddireddi L, Rankin AJ. Evaluation of conjunctival bacterial flora in a herd of goats in the midwestern United States. Vet Ophthalmol. 2017;20:40–45. doi: 10.1111/vop.12348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tryland M, Das Neves CG, Sunde M, Mork T. Cervid herpesvirus 2, the primary agent in an outbreak of infectious keratoconjunctivitis in semidomesticated reindeer. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:3707–3713. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01198-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Riggio MP, Lennon A, Taylor DJ, Bennett D. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with canine periodontal disease. Vet Microbiol. 2011;150:394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Angelos JA, Ball LM, Hess JF. Identification and characterization of complete RTX operons in Moraxella bovoculi and Moraxella ovis . Vet Microbiol. 2007;125:73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Angelos JA, Hess JF, George LW. Cloning and characterization of a Moraxella bovis cytotoxin gene. Am J Vet Res. 2001;62:1222–1228. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moore LJ, Rutter JM. Attachment of Moraxella bovis to calf corneal cells and inhibition by antiserum. Aust Vet J. 1989;66:39–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1989.tb03012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ruehl WW, Marrs C, Beard MK, Shokooki V, Hinojoza JR, et al. Q pili enhance the attachment of Moraxella bovis to bovine corneas in vitro . Mol Microbiol. 1993;7:285–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Annuar BO, Wilcox GE. Adherence of Moraxella bovis to cell cultures of bovine origin. Res Vet Sci. 1985;39:241–246. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)31752-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moore LJ, Lepper AW. A unified serotyping scheme for Moraxella bovis . Vet Microbiol. 1991;29:75–83. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(91)90111-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marrs CF, Ruehl WW, Schoolnik GK, Falkow S. Pilin-gene phase variation of Moraxella bovis is caused by an inversion of the pilin genes. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:3032–3039. doi: 10.1128/JB.170.7.3032-3039.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lepper AW, Atwell JL, Lehrbach PR, Schwartzkoff CL, Egerton JR, et al. The protective efficacy of cloned Moraxella bovis pili in monovalent and multivalent vaccine formulations against experimentally induced infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK) Vet Microbiol. 1995;45:129–138. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(94)00123-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Angelos JA, Ball LM. Differentiation of Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov. from other coccoid moraxellae by the use of polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis of amplified DNA. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007;19:532–534. doi: 10.1177/104063870701900511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Calcutt MJ, Foecking MF, Martin NT, Mhlanga-Mutangadura T, Reilly TJ. Draft genome sequence of Moraxella bovoculi strain 237T (ATCC BAA-1259T) isolated from a calf with infectious Bovine Keratoconjunctivitis. Genome Announc. 2014;2 doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00612-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Atwell JL, Tennent JM, Lepper AW, Elleman TC. Characterization of pilin genes from seven serologically defined prototype strains of Moraxella bovis . J Bacteriol. 1994;176:4875–4882. doi: 10.1128/JB.176.16.4875-4882.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fulks KA, Marrs CF, Stevens SP, Green MR. Sequence analysis of the inversion region containing the pilin genes of Moraxella bovis . J Bacteriol. 1990;172:310–316. doi: 10.1128/JB.172.1.310-316.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Luke NR, Jurcisek JA, Bakaletz LO, Campagnari AA. Contribution of Moraxella catarrhalis type IV pili to nasopharyngeal colonization and biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2007;75:5559–5564. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00946-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Prieto C, Serra DO, Martina P, Jacobs M, Bosch A, et al. Evaluation of biofilm-forming capacity of Moraxella bovis, the primary causative agent of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Vet Microbiol. 2013;166:504–515. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ely VL, Vargas AC, Costa MM, Oliveira HP, Potter L, et al. Moraxella bovis, Moraxella ovis and Moraxella bovoculi: biofilm formation and lysozyme activity. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;126:369–376. doi: 10.1111/jam.14086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ruehl WW, Marrs CF, George L, Banks SJ, Schoolnik GK. Infection rates, disease frequency, pilin gene rearrangement, and pilin expression in calves inoculated with Moraxella bovis pilin-specific isogenic variants. Am J Vet Res. 1993;54:248–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES