Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2021 Feb 20;120(9):1537–1541. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.019

Stable polymer bilayers for protein channel recordings at high guanidinium chloride concentrations

Luning Yu 1, Xinqi Kang 2, Mohammad Amin Alibakhshi 1, Mikhail Pavlenok 4, Michael Niederweis 4, Meni Wanunu 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC8204206  PMID: 33617833

Abstract

The use of chaotropic reagents is common in biophysical characterization of biomolecules. When the study involves transmembrane protein channels, the stability of the protein channel and supporting bilayer membrane must be considered. In this letter, we show that planar bilayers composed of poly(1,2-butadiene)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) diblock copolymer are stable and leak-free at high guanidinium chloride concentrations, in contrast to diphytanoyl phosphatidylcholine bilayers, which exhibit deleterious leakage under similar conditions. Furthermore, insertion and functional analysis of channels such as α-hemolysin and MspA are straightforward in these polymer membranes. Finally, we demonstrate that α-hemolysin channels maintain their structural integrity at 2 M guanidinium chloride concentrations using blunt DNA hairpins as molecular reporters.

Significance

Single-channel recordings at high concentrations of chaotropic agents, particularly guanidinium chloride, are difficult to perform using standard phosphatidylcholine-based lipid membranes because guanidinium and phosphate interactions destabilize these membranes. We introduce here a diblock copolymer membrane that works remarkably well for single-channel measurements at high concentrations of guanidinium chloride. We demonstrate efficient destabilization of DNA hairpins by guanidinium chloride, as well as the structural integrity of α-hemolysin channels.

Main text

Planar bilayer membranes are commonly used to probe isolated transmembrane channels by using a single-channel recording apparatus (1). In this setup, two electrodes are used to apply voltage to electrolyte solutions present across a bilayer membrane, which drives ion flow across any available path through the membrane, for example, a transmembrane protein channel such as α-hemolysin from Staphylococcus aureus (Fig. 1 A). Typically, the lipid bilayer is impermeable to ions, which allows sensitive measurements of ion flux across the membrane protein. However, in some conditions the electrolyte contains agents that compromise the bilayer membrane stability, which makes single-channel measurements impossible to conduct. Diphytanoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPhPC) is a common lipid often used to make bilayer membranes for single-channel measurements of different analytes. However, at high concentrations of guanidinium chloride (GdmCl), a common reagent that induces protein unfolding (3, 4, 5), DPhPC membranes exhibit significant permeability, and experiments are limited to low voltage and moderate GdmCl concentrations (6, 7, 8, 9).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Permeability of DPhPC bilayers and PBD-PEO bilayers in high guanidinium chloride (GdmCl) concentrations. (A) Cartoon side view of a bilayer membrane supported by a wedge-on-pillar aperture (2) is given. A single α-hemolysin channel inserted through the bilayer is shown. A patch-clamp amplifier is used to record ion flux through the bilayer and transmembrane channel for electrolytes containing GdmCl. (B) Current versus time traces for PBD-PEO bilayers (chemical structure shown) and DPhPC bilayers when voltage increments are applied in opposite polarities to test permeability (electrolyte: 5 M GdmCl, 1 M KCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5)) are shown. Nonzero current fluctuations correspond to ion leakage through the membranes (indicated by red arrows). Traces were low-pass filtered to 10 kHz using the Axopatch internal filter and digitally sampled at 16 bit, 250 kHz using a DAQ card (National Instruments, Austin, TX). (C) Average leakage current versus voltage for DPhPC and PBD-PEO bilayer membranes at indicated GdmCl concentrations (+1 M KCl) is shown. Error bars represent the standard deviation based on five sets of measurements. (D) Critical voltage versus [GdmCl] for PBD-PEO (yellow) and DPhPC (blue) bilayer membranes is shown, determined by the voltage at which mean leakage current exceeds 5 pA. Line and sigmoidal curves are guides to the eye. To see this figure in color, go online.

Triblock polymers have been used to replace lipid bilayer membranes in single-channel recordings (10,11). However, in search of a bilayer-type replacement for lipid-based membranes, we have tested the amphiphilic diblock copolymer poly(1,2-butadiene)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (abbreviated PBD-PEO, catalogue #P41807C-BdEO; Polymer Source, Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Fig. 1 B shows the chemical structure of PBDn-PEOm (n ∼11, m ∼8), which has an estimated core bilayer thickness of ∼4.4 nm (see Fig. S1) (12), similar to commonly used DPhPC bilayers (∼5.0 nm) (13,14) which we use to benchmark against here (catalogue #850356C; Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL). After pipette painting thin organic membrane solutions in decane across our 100 μm diameter wedge-on-pillar (2) aperture, we gradually thin the membrane by passing air bubbles across it until a true bilayer is formed, indicated by a rise in membrane capacitance to 70 ± 10 pF, and also by the observation of spontaneous insertion of protein channels after their addition to the top (cis) chamber. Also shown in Fig. 1 B are excerpts of current versus time recordings that probe ion permeability for 1 M KCl + 5 M GdmCl buffer, obtained by applying alternating polarity DC voltages with increasing magnitudes and monitoring current as a function of time using a patch-clamp amplifier (Axopatch 200B; Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA). Leakage current versus voltage statistics for different electrolytes are summarized in Fig. 1 C, in which the error bars represent standard deviations of the leakage currents. To obtain these data, we applied sequential 20 mV increments (positive polarity only) and monitored the current leakage. Even in 5 M GdmCl, the PBD-PEO membrane is impermeable up to 340 mV, whereas significant ion permeability was observed for DPhPC membranes at lower voltages for all electrolyte conditions (for representative raw traces, see Fig. S2). In Fig. 1 D, we present the critical voltage as a function of GdmCl concentration for DPhPC and PBD-PEO membranes, defined as the voltage at which the average DC current (Iavg) exceeds 5 pA. The rapid decline in voltage stability for DPhPC suggests a significant membrane destabilization, possibly through formation of interactions with phosphate groups of DPhPC (15, 16, 17). In contrast, PBD-PEO has an outstanding chemical resilience at GdmCl concentrations sufficient to denature most proteins.

In Fig. 2, A and B, we present current traces before and immediately after single-channel insertion into PBD-PEO bilayer membranes for both α-hemolysin from S. aureus (catalogue #H9395; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and an engineered MspA channel from Mycobacterium smegmatis, M2-MspA (18). As seen in the traces, both M2-MspA and α-hemolysin produce stable current levels with and without GdmCl, similar to ones that are routinely observed with DPhPC membranes (see power spectra in Fig. S3). In Fig. 2 C, a 2.5 s current recording at 150 mV of a single M2-MspA channel is shown with spikes caused by the addition of a short (15 nt) single-stranded DNA to the cis chamber (for an extended trace, see Fig. S4). The channel shows normal activity and a high rate of events caused by DNA interactions with the M2-MspA channel. In Fig. 2 D, a 52 s current recording at 100 mV of an α-hemolysin channel is shown with spikes caused by the addition of a 60 nt single-stranded DNA to the cis chamber (for an extended trace, see Fig. S5). Similar to M2-MspA, the α-hemolysin channel is stable and active, as evidenced by the stable baseline current and a “healthy” rate of events. Based on these data, we confirm the suitability of PBD-PEO bilayer membranes for single-channel recordings. Finally, in Fig. 2 E we present histograms of experimental bilayer membrane lifetimes, measured by monitoring the current as a function of time for a sealed fluidic cell and recording the time it takes for the bilayers to rupture in 1 M KCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5) electrolyte. The mean lifetime of PBD-PEO bilayers is two- to threefold higher than DPhPC membranes. It should be noted that we have used the PBD-PEO polymers (stored in chloroform at 4°C) for up to 17 months and have not observed any performance degradation, in contrast to DPhPC lipids, which typically degrade within months if not stored with care at −20°C under conditions that minimize oxidation and hydrolysis (19).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Single-channel measurements in PBD-PEO bilayer membranes. Current versus time trace is shown before and after single-channel insertion of M2-MspA and α-hemolysin in (A) 1 M KCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5) (<I> = 184.9 and 97.3 pA for M2-MspA and α-hemolysin at 100 mV, respectively) and (B) 1 M KCl, 1.5 M GdmCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5) (<I> = 410.1 and 164.5 pA for M2-MspA and α-hemolysin at 100 mV, respectively). (C) Current recording of an M2-MspA channel when 1.8 μM 15 nt single-stranded DNA was placed in the cis chamber (electrolyte: 1 M KCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5); V = 150 mV) is shown. (D) Current recording of an α-hemolysin channel when 1 μM 60 nt single-stranded DNA was placed in the cis chamber (electrolyte: 1 M KCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5); V = 100 mV) is given. Traces for (C) and (D) were low-pass filtered to 10 kHz using the Axopatch internal filter and digitally sampled at 16 bit, 250 kHz using a DAQ card (National Instruments). (E) Lifetime histograms measured for DPhPC (n = 20) and PBD-PEO (n = 30) bilayer membranes (electrolyte: 1 M KCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5); V = 0) are given. To see this figure in color, go online.

Finally, we utilize the stable PBD-PEO bilayer membranes to test the structural integrity of the α-hemolysin pore at high GdmCl concentrations. It has been suggested that high urea concentrations might denature the α-hemolysin vestibule cap (20), although this has been questioned in subsequent measurements (21). Here, we use DNA-based molecular probes to test the vestibule cap intactness. Short, blunt DNA hairpins are known to produce distinct signatures in α-hemolysin through long-lived interactions with the vestibule regions (22). These interactions are so intricate that DNA hairpins of different stem lengths can be distinguished with 1 bp resolution. In Fig. 3 A, we show a trace for a mixture of 4 and 6 bp blunt hairpins with sequences 5′-CTCGTTTTCGAG-3′ and 5′-CTAACGTTTTCGTTAG-3′, respectively, added to the cis chamber (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa). Long-lived events with two characteristic amplitude levels were obtained, which correspond to the expected levels for these hairpin lengths (2,22). For the same hairpin mixture in 2 M GdmCl + 1 M KCl buffer (Fig. 3 B), we find much faster events that exclusively contain two levels, an intermediate blockade level with relatively long (approximately millisecond) timescale, followed by a rapid deep level, which we attribute to translocation of the denatured DNA hairpin (for longer traces, see Fig. S6). Fig. 3 C shows a scatter plot of fractional blockades versus event dwell times for the two experiments in Fig. 3, A and B. The scatter plots reveal dwell times that are on average two to three orders of magnitude shorter than for 1 M KCl buffer alone, suggesting that 2 M GdmCl affects hairpin stability. The effect of urea on disrupting DNA and RNA secondary structures are well known and have been reported to facilitate transport of structured nucleic acids through α-hemolysin channels (21,23). Despite the impact on DNA hairpin stability, the fractional blockade levels for the observed events are very similar (<2% difference) for both electrolyte conditions, which rules out appreciable structural changes to the α-hemolysin vestibule cap in high GdmCl concentrations.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Single-channel measurements in PBD-PEO bilayer membranes. (A and B) Current versus time trace obtained for an α-hemolysin channel when a mixture of 4 bp (0.4 μM) and 6 bp (0.6 μM) blunt DNA hairpins with a T4 loop is added to the cis chamber containing 1 M KCl (A) and 2 M GdmCl + 1 M KCl (B) (electrolyte also contained 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5); V = 175 mV) is shown. To the right of the trace in (B), we show a cartoon of proposed states that correspond to the current signals obtained during 4 bp hairpin occlusion of the vestibule and unzipped hairpin translocation, respectively. (C) Scatter plots of fractional current blockades versus dwell times for the indicated experiments in (A) and (B) are given. To see this figure in color, go online.

In summary, we have shown that bilayer membranes composed of PBD-PEO amphiphilic diblock copolymer are suitable for single-channel recordings in presence of high GdmCl concentrations. The lifetime of PBD-PEO bilayers is superior to that of DPhPC lipid membranes, and reconstitution of protein channels readily occurs. We have utilized this finding to show that the vestibule cap of α-hemolysin maintains its integrity at 2 M GdmCl concentrations while significantly destabilizing the secondary duplex structures of short blunt DNA hairpins.

Author contributions

L.Y. designed and performed research and analyzed all data. X.K. fabricated the support chips. M.A.A. helped with the research design. M.P. expressed and purified M2-MspA. M.N. oversaw protein expression research. M.W. designed the research and wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant R21HG010543 to M.N.

Footnotes

Editor: Roland Winter.

Supporting Material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.019.

Supporting material

Document S1. Figs. S1–S6
mmc1.pdf (656.8KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supporting material
mmc2.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Montal M., Mueller P. Formation of bimolecular membranes from lipid monolayers and a study of their electrical properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1972;69:3561–3566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.12.3561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kang X., Alibakhshi M.A., Wanunu M. One-pot species release and nanopore detection in a voltage-stable lipid bilayer platform. Nano Lett. 2019;19:9145–9153. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schellman J.A. Solvent denaturation. Biopolymers. 1978;17:1305–1322. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pace C.N. [14] Determination and analysis of urea and guanidine hydrochloride denaturation curves. Meth. Enzymol. 1986;131:266–280. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)31045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Makhatadze G.I., Privalov P.L. Protein interactions with urea and guanidinium chloride. A calorimetric study. J. Mol. Biol. 1992;226:491–505. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90963-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oukhaled G., Mathé J., Auvray L. Unfolding of proteins and long transient conformations detected by single nanopore recording. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:158101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.158101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pastoriza-Gallego M., Rabah L., Pelta J. Dynamics of unfolded protein transport through an aerolysin pore. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:2923–2931. doi: 10.1021/ja1073245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Merstorf C., Cressiot B., Pelta J. Wild type, mutant protein unfolding and phase transition detected by single-nanopore recording. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012;7:652–658. doi: 10.1021/cb2004737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pastoriza-Gallego M., Breton M.-F., Pelta J. Evidence of unfolded protein translocation through a protein nanopore. ACS Nano. 2014;8:11350–11360. doi: 10.1021/nn5042398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meier W., Nardin C., Winterhalter M. Reconstitution of channel proteins in (polymerized) ABA triblock copolymer membranes this work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation. We thank Dr. T. Hirt and Dr. J. Leukel for the synthesis of the triblock copolymer, Dr. P. Van Gelder and Dr. F. Dumas for bright and helpful discussions, and T. Haefele for his contribution to the experimental part. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2000;39:4599–4602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Morton D., Mortezaei S., Theogarajan L. Tailored polymeric membranes for Mycobacterium smegmatis porin A (MspA) based biosensors. J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med. 2015;3:5080–5086. doi: 10.1039/C5TB00383K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grillo D.A., Albano J.M.R., Ferraro M.B. Diblock copolymer bilayers as model for polymersomes: a coarse grain approach. J. Chem. Phys. 2017;146:244904. doi: 10.1063/1.4986642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benz R., Janko K. Voltage-induced capacitance relaxation of lipid bilayer membranes. Effects of membrane composition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1976;455:721–738. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90043-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reiter R., Zaitseva E., Zumbuehl A. Activity of the gramicidin A ion channel in a lipid membrane with switchable physical properties. Langmuir. 2019;35:14959–14966. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oku N., MacDonald R.C. Solubilization of phospholipids by chaotropic ion solutions. J. Biol. Chem. 1983;258:8733–8738. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Onda M., Yoshihara K., Kunitake T. Molecular recognition of nucleotides by the guanidinium unit at the surface of aqueous micelles and bilayers. A comparison of microscopic and macroscopic interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:8524–8530. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pantos A., Tsogas I., Paleos C.M. Guanidinium group: a versatile moiety inducing transport and multicompartmentalization in complementary membranes. Biochimi. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1778:811–823. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.12.003. Published online December 15, 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Butler T.Z., Pavlenok M., Gundlach J.H. Single-molecule DNA detection with an engineered MspA protein nanopore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:20647–20652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807514106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim R.S., LaBella F.S. Comparison of analytical methods for monitoring autoxidation profiles of authentic lipids. J. Lipid Res. 1987;28:1110–1117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pastoriza-Gallego M., Oukhaled G., Pelta J. Urea denaturation of alpha-hemolysin pore inserted in planar lipid bilayer detected by single nanopore recording: loss of structural asymmetry. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:3371–3376. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Japrung D., Henricus M., Bayley H. Urea facilitates the translocation of single-stranded DNA and RNA through the alpha-hemolysin nanopore. Biophys. J. 2010;98:1856–1863. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vercoutere W., Winters-Hilt S., Akeson M. Rapid discrimination among individual DNA hairpin molecules at single-nucleotide resolution using an ion channel. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001;19:248–252. doi: 10.1038/85696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rodriguez-Larrea D., Bayley H. Multistep protein unfolding during nanopore translocation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013;8:288–295. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Figs. S1–S6
mmc1.pdf (656.8KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supporting material
mmc2.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES