Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Jun 28;48(7):5629–5645. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06512-9

Recent advances on drug development and emerging therapeutic agents for Alzheimer’s disease

Teeba Athar 1, K Al Balushi 1, Shah Alam Khan 1,
PMCID: PMC8236749  PMID: 34181171

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative old age disease that is complex, multifactorial, unalterable, and progressive in nature. The currently approved therapy includes cholinesterase inhibitors, NMDA-receptor antagonists and their combination therapy provides only temporary symptomatic relief. Sincere efforts have been made by the researchers globally to identify new targets, discover, and develop novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of AD. This brief review article is intended to cover the recent advances in drug development and emerging therapeutic agents for AD acting at different targets. The article is compiled using various scientific online databases and by referring to clinicaltrials.gov and ALZFORUM (alzforum.org) websites. The upcoming therapies act on one or more targets including amyloids (secretases, Aβ42 production, amyloid deposition, and immunotherapy), tau proteins (tau phosphorylation/aggregation and immunotherapy) and neuroinflammation in addition to other miscellaneous targets. Despite the tremendous improvement in our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of AD, only aducanumab was approved by FDA for the treatment of AD in 18 years i.e., since 2003. Hence, it is concluded that novel therapeutic strategies are required to discover and develop therapeutic agents to fight against the century old AD.

Graphic Abstract

graphic file with name 11033_2021_6512_Figa_HTML.jpg

Keywords: Acetylcholine, Alzheimer’s disease, Beta-Amyloid, Neurodegeneration, Tau proteins

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease. It severely affects cognitive abilities of a person causing loss of memory and conscience. It is complex, unalterable, and progressive in nature. AD is the prevalent cause of dementia in late adult life and is linked with high morbidity and mortality rate in the elderly [1]. In 1906, the first case of AD was reported by a German psychiatrist and pathologist Alois Alzheimer after whom the disease is named [2]. It is associated with both genetic and environmental factors but the most prominent risk factor is age, and thus it is most prevalent in the older groups [3]. It is one of the most widespread neurodegenerative diseases affecting around 40 million people around the globe and it is expected that more than 100 million people will live with AD by 2050. AD is a progressive and a devastating brain disorder that places a considerable financial burden on the government, families, and individuals. Some of the common symptoms of mild AD include a decline in memory, change in personality, impaired reasoning, poor judgments, and inability to perform normal daily tasks, etc. [4]. The key clinical co-pathological indicators (Fig. 1) of AD are the formation of amyloid plaques or senile plaques formed through the accumulation of amyloids in extracellular regions while aggregated hyperphosphorylated tau proteins in the intracellular regions form neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) in affected neurons [5]. Accumulation of amyloid plaques, which primarily contains amyloid beta40/42 peptides, further leads to neuroinflammation and misprocessing of tau proteins. The MRI scan of the brains of AD patients shows shrinkage of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex regions in comparison to the normal brain (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Illustration showing the comparison between the brain of a healthy and an affected one

AD can be classified typically into two types: sporadic and familial. Sporadic AD affects people above 65 years and is often referred to as late-onset AD (LOAD). Familial forms of AD are influenced by genetic factors and inheritance, the affected group lies between 30–65 years of age and is referred to as early-onset AD (EOAD) [6]. The Familial type of AD is originated through a rare autosomal dominant mutation occurring in three genes: Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP), Presenilin 1 (PSEN1), and Presenilin 2 (PSEN2) [7]. The majority of AD cases are sporadic and are driven by environmental factors and few genetic influences. A genetic risk factor found in sporadic AD cases through detailed genome-wide association studies (GWASs) is the presence of epsilon 4 allele in Apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4).

The symptomatic treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors, NMDA-receptor antagonists, and combination therapy are currently approved strategies for AD. However, there are other mechanisms also that contribute to the pathogenesis of AD such as neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, hypoglycemia and vascular dysfunction, metal dyshomeostasis, protein misfolding, clearance of abnormal proteins, etc., and thus are the potential targets for the treatment of AD [8]. The new disease-modifying drug (DMF) strategies are emerging that target the pathogenic culprits of the disease i.e., extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles in addition to other miscellaneous mechanisms. This brief review article is intended to review the approved symptomatic therapies, upcoming therapies targeting amyloids, tau proteins, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and miscellaneous targets.

Therapeutic strategies for the development of anti-AD drugs

AD exhibits complicated multifactorial pathophysiology which is responsible for the disease being difficult to handle. The AD pathogenesis is associated with several complex pathways including deficiency in cholinergic neurotransmission, defective beta-amyloid (Aβ) protein metabolism (Aβ aggregation), tau protein deposition and phosphorylation (NFT), and the involvement of inflammatory and oxidative pathways [9]. The currently approved drugs act on one target (one drug one target; ODOT) but lately, attention has been paid to multiple therapeutic strategies to design and develop drugs capable of hitting at more than one target [8, 10]. Multi-target drugs (MTDs) are designed by incorporating two or more pharmacophoric structural features of bioactive drugs acting at different targets in a single molecule. These pharmacophoric structural scaffolds can be connected directly (fused), through a tether/linker or merged together. ANAVAX 2–73 and ladostigil are examples of the drugs acting at multiple targets. Ladostigil, a hybrid conjugate (merged) of carbamate rivastigmine and N-propargyl, is a dual inhibitor of cholinesterase (ChE) and monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzymes (Fig. 2). This drug failed to meet its primary endpoint of delaying progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD in second phase 2 clinical trials [11].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Chemical strategy used to synthesize ladostigil and idalopiridine as multi-target drugs

Lumateperone is an example of another multi-target drug that could regulate the levels of several neurotransmitters (Fig. 2). It was evaluated for its efficacy in the phase 3 trial. But, the drug did not meet the primary endpoint and the trial was discontinued in 2018 [12]. Idalopirdine (2-(6-fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-ethyl]-[3-(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy)-benzyl]-amine) is a hybrid molecule designed to inhibit AChE and to target 5-HT6 receptors (Fig. 2). It was prepared by incorporating tryptamine moiety, a pharmacophore from 5-HT and a benzylamine pharmacophore from an AChE inhibitor. It received a fast-track designation by FDA in 2016, however it showed weak efficacy in the phase 3 trials and therefore was discontinued [13]. In our opinion, the hybridization approach should be used to fuse, merge or link two or more pharmacophoric motifs acting at more than one target but through the same pathway to obtain MTDs possessing synergistic therapeutic effects.

Though MTD strategy is a promising rational approach but an approved drug progressing from clinical trials to market is yet to be developed. As of 4th March 2021, more than 140 agents with the diverse mechanisms of action have been registered in the clinical trials for AD. The result of a search done on clinical trials by entering the term “Alzheimer’s” in the disease field and selecting interventional studies revealed that there are currently 111 clinical studies in phase 2/3 and 29 in phase 3 clinical trials. These interventional studies are evaluating the safety and efficacy of new molecules and repurposed drugs acting on different targets. Majority of the therapeutic agents in the pipeline target amyloids (AChEI, BACE inhibitors) tau proteins, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, metal dysregulation, neuroinflammation and at some miscellaneous targets to reverse the progression of AD. Various therapeutic approaches used to develop agents for AD are illustrated in Fig. 3 and the status of some selected agents tested in clinical trials is presented in Table 1.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Various therapeutic approaches used to develop agents for AD

Table 1.

Status and mechanism of action of some selected anti- AD drugs tested in clinical trials

S. no Name of the drug Mechanism of action Status of the clinical trial
1 Lanabecestat BACE1 reversible inhibition phase 3 (terminated in 2018)
2 Umibecestat BACE1 reversible inhibition Phase 2/3 (terminated in 2019)
3 Tramiprosatea Aβ aggregation inhibition Phase 3 (discontinued in 2007)
4 ALZ-801 Aβ aggregation inhibition Phase 3 (ongoing)
5 Verubecestat BACE1 reversible inhibition Phase 3 (discontinued in 2017)
6 Elenbecestat BACE1 reversible inhibition Phase 3 (discontinued in 2019)
7 Atabecestat BACE1 reversible inhibition Phase 2/3 (ongoing)
8 Semagacestat γ-secretase inhibitor Phase 3 (terminated in 2011)
9 Avagacestat γ-Secretase inhibitor Phase 2 (discontinued in 2012)
10 Etazolate α-Secretase stimulator Phase 2 (ongoing)
11 Acitretina α-Secretase stimulator Phase 2 (ongoing)
12 Epigallocatechin-gallatea α-Secretase stimulator Phase 2/3 (ongoing)
13 Tarenflurbil (MPC-7869) γ-Secretase inhibitor Phase 3 (terminated in 2009)
14 GV 971 Aβ aggregation inhibitor Phase 3 (undergoing)
15 Colostrinin Aβ aggregation inhibitor Phase 2 (terminated in 2009)
16 Bapineuzumab Anti-amyloid mAB Phase 3 (discontinued in 2012)
17 Solanezumab Anti-amyloid mAB Phase 3 (ongoing)
18 Gantenerumab Anti-amyloid mAB Phase 3 (ongoing)
19 Aducanumaba Anti-amyloid mAB Approved (7th June 2021)
20 Lecanemab Anti-amyloid mAB Phase 3 (ongoing)
21 LMTM tau aggregation inhibitor Phase 3 (ongoing)
22 Blarcamesine Sigma-1 receptor activator Phase 2b/3 (ongoing)
23 Saracatiniba Src kinase inhibitor Phase 2a (terminated in 2018)
24 Thiamet G O-GlcNAcase enzyme inhibitor Phase 1 (ongoing)
25 Telmisartana Angiotensin II receptor blocker Phase 2 (ongoing)
26 ALZT-OP1a Aβ clearance promotor Phase 3 (ongoing)
27 Atuzaginstat Irreversible inhibitor of gingipain Phase 2/3 (ongoing)
28 Masitiniba Tyrosine kinase inhibitor Phase 2b/3 (completed)
29 Azeliragon Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) inhibitor Phase 3 (Ongoing)
30 Encenicline Partial α7-nAChR Agonist Phase 3 (on clinical hold)
31 J-147 MAO-B inhibitor Phase 1 (ongoing)
32 Escitaloprama Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor Phase 3 (ongoing)
33 Brexipiperazolea Partial agonist of 5-HT1A and dopamine D2 and D3 receptors Phase 2/3 (ongoing)
34 Pioglitazonea Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist Phase 3 (terminated in 2018)
35 Guanfacinea α2A adrenergic receptor agonist Phase 3 (ongoing)
36 Losartana Angiotensin II receptor blocker Phase 2/3 (ongoing)
37 Minocyclinea Anti-inflmmatory, inhibits microglial inactivation Phase 2 (discontinued in 2019)
38 Nivaldipinea Calcium channel blocker Phase 3 (Inactive since 2018)
39 Liraglutidea Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist Phase 2b (ongoing)
40 Semaglutidea Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist Phase 3 (ongoing)
41 Aripiprazolea Dopamine D2 agonist Phase 3 (terminated in 2016)
42 Lumateperone (ITI-007) 5HT2A antagonist, SSRI, glutamate GluN2B receptor phosphoprotein modulator Phase 3 (terminated in 2018, failed to meet the primary end point objectives)
43 Idalopirdine AChE inhibitor and 5HT-6 antagonist Phase 3 (discontinued in 2017)
44 AVP-786 NMDA receptor antagonist Phase 3 (ongoing)

aMarketed drug/US-FDA approved

Drug repositioning and repurposing are the strategies to accelerate the drug discovery and development process. Drug repurposing involves the use of an approved existing drug for some new therapeutic indication, for example, use of remdesivir in COVID-19 [14] while drug repositioning occurs during the development process in biopharmaceutical industries and refers to the development of a drug for an indication different than its original intended indication [15]. Applications of drug repurposing and repositioning to identify novel molecules for the treatment of AD have been reviewed [1520]. One study reported that approximately 40% of drugs currently undergoing clinical trials for the development of anti-AD drugs belong to the repurposed drugs. More than 3/4th of these drugs are disease-modifying agents with the highest representation from hematologic-oncologic agents (20%), cardiovascular drugs (18%), antipsychotic agents (14%) and antidiabetic agents (12%). Some of the repurposed drugs in the pipeline for AD in the phase 3 clinical trials include escitalopram (SSRI, antipsychotic), brexipiperazole (Dopamine D2 partial receptor agonist, schizophrenia), masitinib (anticancer), metformin (antidiabetic), guanfacine and losartan (cardiovascular) [16]. Corbett et al., in 2012 published an expert Delphi consensus review listing five potential classes of prioritized drugs for repurposing namely, minocycline (tetracycline antibiotic), losartan (angiotensin receptor blocker), nivaldipine (calcium channel blocker), liraglutide or semaglutide (glucagon- like peptides 1) and retinoid therapy for the treatment of AD [21]. Clinical trials of minocycline, nivaldipine, and losartan did not reveal significant benefits in AD patients [2224]. A recent Delphi consensus process conducted in 2018–19 further identified three new high priority repurposed drug candidates for clinical trials in AD patients. These molecules were shortlisted based on the preclinical data and include fasudil (a selective inhibitor of rho kinase; ROCK inhibitor), phenserine (AChE inhibitor) and valaciclovir, acyclovir, foscarnet and famciclovir (antiviral drugs). The non-shortlisted compounds included ACE inhibitors (captopril, ramipril, perindopril) and some disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, cyclosporine, etc.) [15]. Preclinical studies indicated that fasudil acts by decreasing the Aβ levels, neuroinflammation and by preventing synaptic damage [2527]. Antiviral drugs might inhibit Aβ aggregation and abnormal tau phosphorylation induced by herpes simplex virus [28, 29].

Kumar et al., used in silico approach combined with in vitro investigation to identify repurposed drugs as AChE inhibitors among the pool of FDA-approved drugs (2369) to treat AD. Based on the virtual screening and in vitro analysis, they identified three classes of repurposed drugs viz., thiazolidinedione antidiabetic (rosiglitazone), aminoquinoline antimalarial (hydroxychloroquine), and antifungal drugs (miconazole) as mild to moderate AChE inhibitors [17].

Stem cell (SC) therapy is another upcoming field that has received considerable attention in recent years to treat cancer, blood-related diseases and neurodegenerative diseases including AD [30, 31]. It has shown promising results in AD animal models, preclinical and in early clinical studies especially with regard to reduction in neuroinflammation, increase in neurotransmission, neuronal growth and clearance of proteins, etc. Different type of stem cells such as embryonic SC can mitigate ACh levels [32], induced pluripotent SC can help in regeneration of depleted neural network [33, 34] while umbilical cord blood/placenta and mesenchymal SC can reduce Aβ, tau phosphorylation and reverse microglial neuroinflammation [35]. Several clinical trials (phase1/2) involving autologous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), human MSC, leukemia MSC, bone marrow MSC and human umbilical cord blood-derived MSC have been conducted in the AD patients to evaluate their safety and efficacy [36, 37]. Undoubtedly stem cell therapy has the potential to produce disease-modifying effects in AD and therefore cast a ray of hope in a battle against the devastating AD. Though numerous challenges and hurdles (safety, efficacy, genomic instability, reproducibility of cell types, route of administration, optimization of clinical outcome, ethical issues, etc.) are to be overcome before the introduction of this innovative technique into clinical practice.

FDA approved symptomatic therapies to treat AD

Pathways and exact mechanisms leading to AD are still not completely understood resulting in a high rate of failed therapeutic strategies. Presently the symptomatic treatment of the disease to slow the progression of AD is concentrated on three therapies: (a) Cholinesterase inhibitors; (b) N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, and c) combination therapy. The prime cause of AD is the depletion of the neurotransmitter, hence the cholinesterase inhibitors aimed at increasing the amount of ACh, this is achieved through the application of cholinergic inhibitors (viz., rivastigmine, donepezil, tacrine, galantamine). These inhibitors limit the reduction of ACh concentration in the brain (Fig. 4) [38].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Chemical structures of FDA approved anti-AD drugs; a rivastigmine, b donepezil, c galantamine and d memantine

Ideally, the NMDA-receptor functions by permitting calcium ions entry for neurotransmission. But in the case of AD, the receptor manifests high activity resulting in over-abundance of Ca2+ leading to excitotoxicity and cell death [39]. The high activity of the receptor is controlled by an anti-AD drug called memantine that binds to the open state of the NMDA-receptor and functions as a non-competitive antagonist [3].

In combination therapy, a mixture of memantine and donepezil (28 mg and 10 mg, respectively once daily) has shown effective results in treating symptoms like cognitive judgment, language, and behavioral problems in the moderate to severe group of AD patients. The results were significantly better than placebo comprising a combination of memantine and placebo [40]. However, the combination was not effective in patients with mild to moderate disease [41].

Unfortunately, the currently approved agents offer temporary relief from the symptoms of this complex disease and therefore search is on to discover and develop novel agents for AD therapy.

Upcoming AD therapies targeting amyloids

The amyloid hypothesis describes beta amyloid (Aβ) formation to be one of the major culprits in the pathogenesis of AD [42]. A sequence of proteolysis of APP forms Aβ. This is achieved through two metabolic pathways: the non-amyloidogenic pathway and the amyloidogenic pathway. First, APP is proteolyzed by an enzyme α-secretase forming α-APP and an 83 amino acids peptide. The latter peptide is then cleaved by γ-secretase resulting in the formation of two non-amyloidogenic peptides [43]. In the amyloidogenic pathway, enzyme β-secretase (BACE) cleaves APP into β-APP and a 91 amino acids peptide which comes under the action of γ-secretase forming amyloidogenic peptides namely Aβ40, Aβ42 and Aβ43 [44].

Therapeutics targeting secretases

Inhibition of BACE is understood to limit the production of Aβ42 [45]. Several agents targeting secretase entered into the clinical trials including CTS-21166 (CoMentis), PF-05297909 (Pfizer), LY2886721 (Lilly), AZD3293 (AstraZeneca) [46]. CTS-21166 in the phase 1 clinical trial conducted in young healthy men showed depletion in the amount of Aβ in human plasma [47]. AZD3293 was also reported to exhibit promising results under a combined clinical trial phase 2/3 [48].

β-secretase (BACE) inhibitor

Lanabecestat is another orally active BACE-1 inhibitor (AZD3293 or LY3314814). This drug showed excellent results in the preclinical phase. Lilly and Astra Zeneca obtained an FDA track designation for this drug in 2016 and in the same year it was advanced to the phase 3 clinical trials. Unfortunately, the two ongoing trials were terminated in June 2018 by the pharmaceutical companies because it was found to be ineffective [49].

Clinical trials of verubecestat (MK-8931) and elenbecestat (E2609) were also stopped in between due to their efficacy concerns as these drugs did not show any improvement in cognition scores in the subjects [50, 51]. However, the efficacy and safety of oral atabecestat (JNJ-54861911) are currently being evaluated in phase 2/3 clinical trials [52, 53]. It is a thiazine-based small molecule with good blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability. It inhibits APP cleavage by the enzyme BACE and thus reduces Aβ level in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Results of long-term safety and tolerability of atabecestat in the early AD patients evaluated through a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and a two-period extension study showed it to be associated with a trend toward declines in cognition, and elevation of liver enzymes [54].

Umibecestat (CNP520) is a BACE inhibitor developed by Novartis for the treatment of early stages of AD [55]. The ongoing GENERATION clinical trial was prematurely stopped in 2019 due to cognitive worsening in the participants [56].

γ-Secretase inhibitors

γ-Secretase is an important target in the pharmacotherapy of AD as inhibition of this enzyme results to a reduction in the production of Aβ. Semagacestat (LY450139) is a nonselective γ-secretase inhibitor developed by Lilly. It showed a dose-dependent decrease in the production of Aβ in healthy subjects [57]. Two clinical trials under phase 3 of the same drug were also prematurely interrupted as patients suffering from mild to moderate AD started to show a significant deterioration of cognitive functions besides the risk of skin cancer and weight loss [58]. This unfortunate event was caused because γ-secretase also catalyze other transmembrane proteins, one of them being the Notch receptor. Inhibition of notch receptor caused severe hepatic and splenic side effects [59]. Avagacestat, another γ-secretase inhibitor, also failed to show promising results in AD [60, 61].

α-Secretase stimulators

α-Secretase stimulation through activating protein kinase C has shown depletion in the levels of Aβ [62]. Etazolate (EHT 0202; ExonHit Therapeutics, Paris, France) a pyrazolopyridine derivative having anxiolytic properties is currently being investigated in clinical trials. It is a promising α-secretase stimulator that has been shown to inhibit Aβ induced cell death and also exhibit a relief in AD symptoms [59, 63]. Acitretin also enhances the α-secretase secretion and is thought to help in the non-amyloidogenic APP pathway [64].

Epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCG, Sunphenone) is a polyphenolic flavonoid phytoconstituent found in green tea. It possesses a broad spectrum of bioactivities including anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties [65]. Experimental studies have provided the evidence that it acts by increasing α-secretase cleavage of APP thereby improving cognitive defects in APP/PS1 Mice [66, 67]. It is used as a dietary supplement to combat AD and Down syndrome. It was studied in phase 2/3 clinical trials, but the results were not published. Researchers in Spain started a trial to evaluate the ability of EGCG in the prevention of cognitive decline in ApoE4 carriers with subjective cognitive impairment through a one-year multimodal intervention study [68]. The chemical structure of drugs targeting secretases in AD have been shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Chemical structure of drugs targeting secretases in AD

Therapeutics targeting Aβ42

As discussed above, Aβ42 is produced under the proteolytic activity of enzymes BACE-1 and γ-secretase. Agents working on these two enzymes would help in the reduction of Aβ42 production. Tarenflurbil is an anti-inflammatory drug chemically related to ibuprofen (Fig. 6). It acts on γ-secretase by allosterically modifying its catalysis of AP and in place of Aβ42, Aβ38 is produced that manifests lower neurotoxicity compared to Aβ42 [62]. The phase 2 trial showed encouraging results, but the agent because of poor brain penetrability and low efficacy failed miserably in the phase 3 trial as well as in its subsequent phase 3 trials [69, 70].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Chemical structure of drugs targeting Aβ42 and inhibiting amyloid aggregation

Therapeutics targeting formation of amyloid deposition/aggregation

A number of therapeutic agents have been developed to target and inhibit amyloid aggregation. Two drugs namely tramiprosate and colostrinin showed encouraging results in the early phases of clinical trials. Tramiprosate (3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid; 3-APS; homotaruine) is an example of a naturally occurring amino acid in seaweed (Fig. 6). It is a structural analog of taurine and GABA. It exerts neuroprotective activity via modulation of GABA receptors. It inhibits Aβ aggregation by hindering the binding of glycosaminoglycan to Aβ and thereby prevents the formation of β-sheet [59]. The phase 2 clinical trials comprising patients with mild to moderate AD showed a reduction in cognitive loss and an increase in CSF Aβ42 concentration [71]. The phase 3 clinical trials of tramiprosate couldn’t show promising results as were expected, however, the agent limited the hippocampal volume reduction and cognitive loss. In 2018, Hey et al., described the discovery, identification and promising results of an ALZ-801, a prodrug of tramiprostate, in AD [72]. GV 971 (Sodium oligo-mannurarate) derived from brown algae is an Aβ aggregation inhibitor developed by Shanghai Green Valley Pharmaceuticals, China [73]. This small molecule (acidic linear oligosaccharide) possessing anti-inflammatory activity is approved in China for the treatment of mild to moderate AD. However, in US-FDA, it is undergoing phase 3 clinical trials [74]. Results of a 24-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo parallel controlled clinical trial of sodium oligomannate in Alzheimer’s dementia showed it to be safe and well tolerated by AD subjects [75].

Colostrinin is a polypeptide affluent in proline, it is derived from ovine colostrum. It has been demonstrated to inhibit the Aβ aggregation by modulating an innate immune response [76]. Szaniszlo et al., highlighted its clinical potential in AD therapy [77]. Colostrinin in Phase 2 clinical trials conducted on patients with mild to moderate AD showed recovery in Mini Mental State Evaluation scores after a treatment period of 15 months. But the same results were not obtained after 15 months of consecutive treatment [78].

Immunotherapy targeting inhibition of Aβ aggregation

Immunotherapy targeted against amyloids is one of the approaches being considered by the concerned authorities to tackle AD. So far, two mechanisms have been elucidated to tackle AD: active immunization and passive immunization. Active immunization is aiming to produce a vaccine against Aβ42 targeting the production of amyloid plaques. Phase 2 clinical trials of a vaccine exhibited better cognitive results as well as reduction of Aβ42 levels and tau levels, however, the trial was terminated because a number of subjects suffered from meningo-encephalitis after getting vaccinated [79]. Passive immunization is focused upon monoclonal antibodies (mAB) and the administration of immunoglobulins (Ig). Bapineuzumab, solanezumab, and gantenerumab are currently under investigation and are assumed to show promising results.

Bapineuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody (hmAB). The agent entered phase 3 trials. It showed efficacy in the improvement of cognitive ability in mild to moderate groups of patients.

Solanezumab is another anti-amyloid mAB that binds to soluble Aβ peptides. The phase 3 clinical trials lasted 80 weeks in mild AD carriers. The study showed a significant reduction in cognition and functionality loss, moreover, biomarker findings in CSF showed solanezumab association with its target [80].

Gantenerumab, an anti-amyloid IgG1 hmAB functions by removing aggregated Aβ plaques through phagocytosis. A phase 2 clinical study (DIAN-TU) was aborted in the early stages as it showed no significant results. The results of randomized and placebo-controlled trials showed that high doses might exhibit some efficacy based on few clinical and biomarker endpoints [81]. The results of GRADUATE studies on the efficacy of a higher gantenerumab dose that most patients received in the DIAN-TU trial are expected in 2022 [8183].

Aducanumab (BIIB037; Aduhelm®), an Aβ-targeting drug, has been approved on 7th June 2021 by US-FDA to treat AD patients. It was approved using an accelerated approval process making it the first approved therapy for AD since 2003. It is a fully human IgG1 mAB that binds selectively to aggregated Aβ fibrils and reduces the Aβ plaques in the brain of AD patients in a dose and time dependent manner [84]. Biogen carried out a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study (2015–2019; NCT02484547) on aducanumab to evaluate the efficacy and safety in subjects with early AD. However, the study was discontinued due to safety concerns. However, Biogen® initiated another phase 3b open-label study in Jan 2020 for three more years. They recruited 2,400 previous aducanumab trial participants to study only safety and tolerability parameters as primary outcomes (EMBARK). The company also submitted a biologics license application to the U.S. FDA in July 2020 [85, 86]. One of the two phase 3 clinical trials met the primary endpoint having shown a significant reduction in Aβ plaques and clinical decline. The outcome of this study led to accelerated approval of aducanumab for the treatment of AD in 18 years. However, FDA will continue to monitor the drug after marketing. Biogen is also required to conduct a post approval clinical trial to verify the drug’s clinical benefit. The approval may be withdrawn in case the trials fail to verify the drug’s clinical benefits [84].

Lecanemab (BAN2401; mAb 158), a humanized mAB, binds selectively to soluble Aβ protofibrils [87]. Initial clinical studies conducted revealed it to have potential disease-modifying properties as it significantly slows down the progression of the disease by reducing the Aβ accumulation in the brain. Isai Inc., in collaboration with Biogen® is testing the anti- Aβ protofibril antibody in phase 3 interventional study in the subjects with early AD (CLARITY AD). The study will run till 2024.[88]. Another phase 3 clinical study (AHEAD 3–45) has also been started in US, Europe and several other countries to evaluate its therapeutic efficacy in pre-clinical AD subjects [89].

Upcoming therapies targeting tau proteins

Neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) formation is a key indicator of AD pathogenesis; therefore, it becomes imperative for treatment therapies to target tau proteins as well. Strategies so far have targeted tau deposition and phosphorylation along with tau immunotherapy.

Therapeutics targeting tau deposition and phosphorylation

Tau deposition and phosphorylation are the two processes that are the culprits in the formation of NFT as well as for the increased neuronal loss. The surged phosphorylation could be controlled through inhibition of enzyme glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) [90]. Lithium is being considered to act as an inhibitor but failed to show efficacy in clinical trials [91]. PKC is stimulated by M1 receptor can also inhibit the enzyme GSK3, studies have shown this might decrease tau phosphorylation and aggregation [9294].

LMTM (LMTX, TRx0237) is an improved derivative of the reduced form of MB (leuco-methylene blue, LMT) in terms of absorption, bioavailability, and tolerability. Leucomethylenthyonium bis hydromethanesulfonate is a second-generation, cysteine independent tau aggregation inhibitor. In addition, several studies indicated to inhibit MAO and diminish nitric oxide production. It is currently evaluated in the phase 3 [95, 96].

A phase 3 clinical trial with 588 enrolled subjects is currently underway to determine the safety and efficacy of TRx0237 at two doses (16 mg/day and 8 mg/day) for AD treatment [97].

Gandini et al., in 2018 identified 2,4-thiadiazolidinedione derivatives to be dual GSK-3β and tau-aggregation inhibitors. The two most potent multitarget compounds were compound T1 ((Z)-5-((5-methoxy-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione) and T2 (Z)-5-((1H-Indol-3-yl)methylene)thiazolidine-2,4-dione (IC50 of 0.89 and 4.93 µM for GSK-3β inhibition). Both compounds also improved cell viability, possessed good BBB penetrability and were non-toxic [98].

Blarcamesine (ANAVEX2-73) is chemically Tetrahydro-N,N-dimethyl-2,2-diphenyl-3-furanmethanamine hydrochloride and is an experimental investigational drug against AD. It is a muscarinic receptor agonist and a sigma-1 receptor activator that targets protein misfolding and reduces tau hyperphosphorylation, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration in AD [99]. It has been shown to exhibit anti-apoptotic and antioxidant activity. The results of the phase 1 clinical trial conducted in Germany determined 55 mg to be the maximum tolerated dose in healthy male volunteers. In a phase 2a study, it demonstrated dose-dependent improvement in MMSE ADCS-ADL. Its single daily dose in capsule form is currently being studied in phase 2b/3 for 48-weeks in 450 patients with early AD in Australia at 16 different sites. This open-label extension (OLE) study might expand to include UK and Canada and the results would be available by December 2023 [100].

Saracatinib (AZD0530) is a dual kinase inhibitor of Src and Abl family kinases1. It is a repurposed drug originally developed to treat cancer. This small molecule in the preclinical studies was shown to block Fyn in brain slices, prevented synaptic depletion and helped to overcome spatial memory deficits in APP/PS1 mice [101]. In the same mouse line, it boosted hippocampal synaptic density [102]. Van Dyck et al. [103] published the results of a randomized clinical trial (NCT02167256) conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and effect of AZD0530 on cerebral metabolic decline in AD. The treatment failed to show a significant reduction in cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (CMRgl) level [103].

Thiamet G (LY3372689) is a promising O-GlcNAcase (OGA) enzyme inhibitor. It has been demonstrated to reduce tau phosphorylation in tau transgenic model TG4510 [104]. It is currently undergoing phase 1 clinical trials [105].

Telmisartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) currently being investigated as a repurposed drug against AD. Scientific evidence indicated that use of ARB in AD may reduce the incidence of cognitive impairment and dementia [106]. It is proposed that it controls cerebral blood flow, protects the cerebral microvasculature, and decreases plaque formation and CSF tau in the brain [107]. It is undergoing phase 2 clinical trials in mild-moderate AD subjects (NCT02085265 and NCT02471833) [108].

Atuzaginstat (COR388) is an irreversible inhibitor of lysine‐gingipain, the virulence factor proteases found in a P. gingivalis periodontal pathogen detected in the brain of AD patients. P. gingivalis infection in cultured human neurons can cause tau phosphorylation and degradation, synapse loss, and cell death [109]. It’s twice-daily dosing is currently being tested in a large phase 2/3 clinical study (GAIN) in subjects with mild‐to‐moderate AD. Results are expected by the end of Dec 2022 [110, 111]. Recently, in Feb 2021, a partial clinical hold on GAIN was imposed by FDA because few participants developed liver abnormalities. However, it was found that the liver effects are reversible and pose no risk of long-term effects [112]. Chemical structures of several new molecules targeting tau proteins are shown in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Chemical structure of new molecules targeting tau proteins

Immunotherapy

A vaccine named AADvac1 is currently under clinical trials. It functions by promoting the generation of antibodies that attack the conformational epitopes regions of tau, resulting in the reduction of tau deposition. The vaccine in humans showed higher efficacy than in experimental animals as the antibodies produced were able to identify tau proteins in mild to moderate AD patients. The vaccine is currently under phase 2 trial [113].

Drugs targeting neuroinflammation

Several independent observational studies have demonstrated that anti-inflammatory drugs use is associated with a lower risk of developing AD. A recent prospective, population-based study reported that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use in elderly people was associated with 71% decreased risk of AD mortality [114].

ALZT-OP1 is a combination regimen of a mast cell stabilizer (cromolyn) and an NSAID to reduce neuroinflammation and to promote Aβ clearance through phagocytosis of Aβ [112]. A phase 3 clinical trial (COGNITE), a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study is evaluating the potential of ALZT-OP1 in slowing down, arrests, or reverse cognitive and functional decline on the CDR-SB in the early-stage AD subjects (NCT02547818).

Masitinib (Masivet, Kinavet, AB1010) is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) known to modulate neuroinflammation mediated by mast cells. Li et al., in 2020 demonstrated that chronic treatment with masitinib could restore spatial learning and synaptic density in the hippocampus in the APP/PS1 mouse model of amyloidosis [115]. AB Science® conducted a phase 2b/3 clinical trial from 2012 to 2020 to compare masitinib 4.5 or 6 mg/kg/day dosing with placebo in 721 confirmed mild to moderate AD subjects receiving a ChE inhibitor and/or memantine in twenty one mostly European countries. The company announced that the study met its primary goal [116].

Minocycline a tetracycline repurposed drug possessing anti-inflammatory activity failed to improve the cognitive and functional ability in mild AD patients during 2 years period in a randomized clinical trial The plausible explanations given by the authors for the failure of this drug in the phase 3 clinical trials were (i) neuroinflammation “may be a reaction to pathologic characteristics of the disease rather than an important factor in neurodegeneration”; (ii) complex association between microglial activation and neurodegeneration and (iii) “minocycline did have some efficacy against AD, but treatment effects were too small to be detectable” [22]. Gyengesi and Münch recommended that future trials should focus on anti-inflammatory drugs capable of decreasing the formation of cytotoxic cytokines [117].

Miscellaneous targets in AD

Azeliragon (TTP488) is an orally active inhibitor of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). RAGE is over expressed in the brain tissues of AD patients. Azeliragon has been shown to slow down the progression of AD [118]. It was developed by vTv Therapeutics® (Originator) and was studied in the phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of Alzheimer’s type dementia (STEADFAST). The trial was terminated in 2019 due to the lack of efficacy of 5 mg dose of Azeliragon [119].

Encenicline (EVP-6124) is a new potent molecule capable of activating α7-nicotinic ACh Receptor (nAChR) in the brain at very low concentration and thereby exhibits memory enhancing properties [120]. The drug showed promising results in mild-to-moderate AD patients with respect to placebo on functional and cognitive skills. However, in 2015 FDA imposed a clinical hold based on the outcome of two phase 3 trials owing to its gastrointestinal side effects [121].

J-147 is a new investigational drug (NID) in US for the treatment of AD. It is a curcumin derivative and its chemical name is; N-(2,4-dimethylphenyl)-2,2,2-trifluoro-N’-[(E)-(3-methoxyphenyl)methylene]acetohydrazide. The experimental drug is orally active, able to cross BBB with ease and was demonstrated to enhance memory in aged AD mice [122]. It also inhibits MAO-B (IC50 = 1.88 µM). It is currently being tested in phase 1 clinical trial. Chemical structures of agents acting at miscellaneous targets in AD are presented in Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Chemical structure of molecules a acting as RAGE inhibitor; b α7-nAChR agonist and c MAO-B inhibitor

Conclusion

AD is a complex neurodegenerative disease affecting millions of people worldwide. Numerous biochemical and pharmacological studies conducted in the past couple of decades have tried to unwind the complexities of this progressive disease. We now have a better understanding of the pathogenesis of AD at the molecular level that has enabled the researchers to discover and develop novel therapeutic agents to treat this devastating disease. A number of therapeutics based on the identified targets were developed from 2010 to 2020 for the treatment of AD and several of these molecules are currently under investigation in clinical studies. Data indicated that over the last decade, the majority of the agents that reached in the phase 2 failed to show a drug-placebo difference and therefore could not make it to phase 3. On the other hand, more than 50 molecules successfully progressed from phase 2 to phase 3 but unfortunately, only one agent could pass the phase 3 clinical trial since 2003. Most of the studies were discontinued/terminated as these agents were found to be toxic and ineffective and thus failed to meet the primary and secondary endpoints of the studies.

In the ongoing clinical trials, anti-amyloid immunotherapy, Aβ aggregation inhibitors, BACE inhibitors, SALA (Selective Aβ42 lowering agents), tau aggregation inhibitors, α-secretase enhancers, anti-tau immunotherapy and anti-inflammatory agents, etc., have exhibited encouraging results in the initial phases. However, the outcome of these clinical studies would shed more light on the safety and effectiveness of therapeutic agents. Currently, more than 140 drug candidates, mostly drug modifying agents, are being tested in various phases of clinical trials but it is yet to be seen how many of these would progress from the clinical testing phase to the clinical practice.

In our opinion, newer therapeutic strategies to design, discover and develop anti-AD agents should focus on (i) repositioning and repurposing of existing drugs for AD; (ii) multitarget directed ligands capable of acting on multiple key molecular targets involved in the pathogenesis of AD (iii) minimizing the toxicity of drugs failed in phase 3 (iv) improving the pharmacokinetic profile of the promising candidates by structural modification, (v) exploring the natural products to identify the lead molecule for AD, (vi) stem cell therapy, and (vii) identification of novel molecular targets including development of immunotherapy.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank The Research Council of Oman (TRC) now part of MOHERI for the award of RG project (RGP/HSS/19/232/2019) in call 2019–2020.

Abbreviations

ACh

Acetylcholine

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

ApoE4

Apolipoprotein E4

APP

Amyloid precursor protein

Beta amyloid

BBB

Blood brain barrier

BACE

Beta secretase

ChE

Cholinesterase

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

DMD

Disease modifying drugs

EOAD

Early onset AD

FDA

Food and drug administration

GABA

Gamma aminobutyric acid

GSK3

Glycogen synthase kinase 3

GWASs

Genome-wide association studies

Ig

Immunoglobulins

LOAD

Late onset AD

mAB

Monoclonal antibodies

MAO

Mono amine oxidase

MSC

Mesenchymal stem cell

MTD

Multi target drugs

nAChR

α7-Nicotinic ACh Receptor

NFT

Neurofibrillary tangles

NID

New investigational drug

NMDA

N-Methyl D-aspartate

NSAID

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

ODOT

One drug one target

OLE

Open label extension

PSEN1

Presenilin 1

RAGE

Receptor for advanced glycation end products

TKI

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Author contributions

SAK, AK and TA carried out the literature review and wrote the manuscript.

Declarations

Conflicts of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and approved the manuscript prior to submission.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Cass SP. Alzheimer's disease and exercise: a literature review. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2017;16:19–22. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berchtold NC, Cotman CW. Evolution in the conceptualization of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: Greco-Roman period to the 1960s. Neurobiol Aging. 1998;19:173–189. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(98)00052-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fish PV, Steadman D, Bayle ED, Whiting P. New approaches for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2019;29:125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gupta S, Nair A, Jhawat V, Mustaq N, Sharma A, Dhanawat M, Khan SA. Unwinding complexities of diabetic Alzheimer by potent novel molecules, American. J Alzheimer's Dis Other Dementias. 2020 doi: 10.1177/1533317520937542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shamsi TN, Athar T, Parveen R, Fatima S. A review on protein misfolding, aggregation and strategies to prevent related ailments. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;105:993–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.07.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel D, George-Hyslop PS, Pericak-Vance MA, Joo S, Rosi B, Gusella J, Crapper-MacLachlan D, Alberts M. Association of apolipoprotein E allele ϵ4 with late-onset familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1993;43:1467–1467. doi: 10.1212/WNL.43.8.1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bertram L, Lill CM, Tanzi RE. The genetics of Alzheimer disease: back to the future. Neuron. 2010;68:270–281. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Husain A, Al Balushi K, Akhtar MJ, Khan SA. Coumarin linked heterocyclic hybrids: a promising approach to develop multi target drugs for Alzheimer's disease. J Mol Struct. 2021;241:130618. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thiratmatrakul S, Yenjai C, Waiwut P, Vajragupta O, Reubroycharoen P, Tohda M, Boonyarat C. Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling study of novel tacrine–carbazole hybrids as potential multifunctional agents for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Med Chem. 2014;75:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Benek O, Korabecny J, Soukup O. A perspective on multi-target drugs for Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Pharmacol Scie. 2020;41(7):434–445. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ladostigil (2019)Therapeutics. https://www.alzforum.org/therapeutics/ladostigil Accessed on 4 March 2021
  • 12.Snyder GL, Vanover KE, Zhu H, Miller DB, O’Callaghan JP, Tomesch J, Li P, Zhang Q, Krishnan V, Hendrick JP. Functional profile of a novel modulator of serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate neurotransmission. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232:605–621. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3704-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Atri A, Frölich L, Ballard C, Tariot PN, Molinuevo JL, Boneva N, Windfeld K, Raket LL, Cummings JL. Effect of idalopirdine as adjunct to cholinesterase inhibitors on change in cognition in patients with Alzheimer disease: three randomized clinical trials. JAMA. 2018;319:130–142. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khan SA, Al-Balushi K. Combating COVID-19: the role of drug repurposing and medicinal plants. J Infection Public Health. 2020;14(4):495–503. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ballard C, Aarsland D, Cummings J, O’Brien J, Mills R, Molinuevo JL, Fladby T, Williams G, Doherty P, Corbett A. Drug repositioning and repurposing for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;14:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0397-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bauzon J, Lee G, Cummings J. Repurposed agents in the Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline. Alzheimer's Res Ther. 2020;12:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00662-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar N, Gahlawat A, Kumar RN, Singh YP, Modi G, Garg P. Drug repurposing for Alzheimer’s disease: in silico and in vitro investigation of FDA-approved drugs as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2020;10:1–15. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1844054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ihara M, Saito S. Drug repositioning for Alzheimer’s disease: finding hidden clues in old drugs. J Alzheimer's Dis. 2020;74:1–16. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Desai RJ, Varma VR, Gerhard T, Segal J, Mahesri M, Chin K, Nonnenmacher E, Gabbeta A, Mammen AM, Varma S. Targeting abnormal metabolism in Alzheimer's disease: The Drug Repurposing for Effective Alzheimer's Medicines (DREAM) study. Alzheimer's Dementia. 2020;6:12095. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim T-W. Drug repositioning approaches for the discovery of new therapeutics for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12:132–142. doi: 10.1007/s13311-014-0325-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Corbett A, Pickett J, Burns A, Corcoran J, Dunnett SB, Edison P, Hagan JJ, Holmes C, Jones E, Katona C. Drug repositioning for Alzheimer's disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:833–846. doi: 10.1038/nrd3869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Howard R, Zubko O, Bradley R, Harper E, Pank L, O’Brien J, Fox C, Tabet N, Livingston G, Bentham P. Minocycline at 2 different dosages vs placebo for patients with mild Alzheimer disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:164–174. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lawlor B, Segurado R, Kennelly S, Olde Rikkert MG, Howard R, Pasquier F, Börjesson-Hanson A, Tsolaki M, Lucca U, Molloy DW. Nilvadipine in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2018;15:e1002660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kehoe PG, Blair PS, Howden B, Thomas DL, Malone IB, Horwood J, Clement C, Selman LE, Baber H, Lane A. The rationale and design of the reducing pathology in Alzheimer’s disease through Angiotensin TaRgeting (RADAR) Trial. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61:803–814. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Song Y, Chen X, Wang LY, Gao W, Zhu MJ. Rho kinase inhibitor fasudil protects against β-amyloid-induced hippocampal neurodegeneration in rats. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2013;19:603–610. doi: 10.1111/cns.12116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Killick R, Ribe E, Al-Shawi R, Malik B, Hooper C, Fernandes C, Dobson R, Nolan P, Lourdusamy A, Furney S. Clusterin regulates β-amyloid toxicity via Dickkopf-1-driven induction of the wnt–PCP–JNK pathway. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:88–98. doi: 10.1038/mp.2012.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Elliott C, Rojo AI, Ribe E, Broadstock M, Xia W, Morin P, Semenov M, Baillie G, Cuadrado A, Al-Shawi R. A role for APP in Wnt signalling links synapse loss with β-amyloid production. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0231-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Santana S, Recuero M, Bullido MJ, Valdivieso F, Aldudo J. Herpes simplex virus type I induces the accumulation of intracellular β-amyloid in autophagic compartments and the inhibition of the non-amyloidogenic pathway in human neuroblastoma cells. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;430:419–430. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lerchundi R, Neira R, Valdivia S, Vio K, Concha MI, Zambrano A, Otth C. Tau cleavage at D 421 by Caspase-3 is induced in neurons and astrocytes infected with herpes simplex virus type 1. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23:513–520. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-101386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mahla RS. Stem cells applications in regenerative medicine and disease therapeutics. Int J Cell Biol. 2016;7:6940283. doi: 10.1155/2016/6940283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lyon L. Stem cell therapies in neurology: the good, the bad and the unknown. Brain. 2018;141:e77–e77. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu Y, Weick JP, Liu H, Krencik R, Zhang X, Ma L, Zhou G-M, Ayala M, Zhang S-C. Medial ganglionic eminence–like cells derived from human embryonic stem cells correct learning and memory deficits. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:440–447. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu X, Li F, Stubblefield EA, Blanchard B, Richards TL, Larson GA, He Y, Huang Q, Tan A-C, Zhang D. Direct reprogramming of human fibroblasts into dopaminergic neuron-like cells. Cell Res. 2012;22:321–332. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang S-M, Lee C-U, Lim HK. Stem cell therapies for Alzheimer's disease: is it time? Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2019;32:105–116. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sharma RR, Pollock K, Hubel A, McKenna D. Mesenchymal stem or stromal cells: a review of clinical applications and manufacturing practices. Transfusion. 2014;54:1418–1437. doi: 10.1111/trf.12421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu X-Y, Yang L-P, Zhao L. Stem cell therapy for Alzheimer's disease. World J Stem Cells. 2020;12:787. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i8.787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Si Z, Wang X. Stem cell therapies in Alzheimer’s disease: applications for disease modeling. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2021;377:207–217. doi: 10.1124/jpet.120.000324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sharma K. Cholinesterase inhibitors as Alzheimer's therapeutics. Mol Med Rep. 2019;20:1479–1487. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lipton SA, Nicotera P. Calcium, free radicals and excitotoxins in neuronal apoptosis. Cell Calcium. 1998;23:165–171. doi: 10.1016/S0143-4160(98)90115-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Howard R, McShane R, Lindesay J, Ritchie C, Baldwin A, Barber R, Burns A, Dening T, Findlay D, Holmes C. Donepezil and memantine for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:893–903. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1106668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Farlow M, Anand R, Messina J, Jr, Hartman R, Veach J. A 52-week study of the efficacy of rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. Eur Neurol. 2000;44:236–241. doi: 10.1159/000008243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Golde TE. The Aβ hypothesis: leading us to rationally-designed therapeutic strategies for the treatment or prevention of Alzheimer disease. Brain Pathol. 2005;15:84–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2005.tb00104.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Selkoe DJ. Clearing the brain's amyloid cobwebs. Neuron. 2001;32:177–180. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00475-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Montoliu-Gaya L, Villegas S. Protein structures in Alzheimer's disease: the basis for rationale therapeutic design. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2015;588:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Francis PT. Glutamatergic approaches to the treatment of cognitive and behavioural symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurodegener Dis. 2008;5:241–243. doi: 10.1159/000113713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ghosh AK, Tang J. Prospects of β-secretase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer’s dishease. ChemMedChem. 2015;10:1463. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201500216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hey J, Koelsch G, Bilcer G, Jacobs A, Tolar M, Tang J, Ghosh A, Hsu H (2008) Single dose administration of the β-secretase inhibitor CTS21166 (ASP1720) reduces plasma Aβ40 in human subjects, International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease (ICAD)
  • 48.Eketjäll S, Janson J, Kaspersson K, Bogstedt A, Jeppsson F, Fälting J, Haeberlein SB, Kugler AR, Alexander RC, Cebers G. AZD3293: a novel, orally active BACE1 inhibitor with high potency and permeability and markedly slow off-rate kinetics. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50:1109–1123. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Burki T. Alzheimer's disease research: the future of BACE inhibitors. Lancet. 2018;391:2486. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31425-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Blume T, Filser S, Jaworska A, Blain J-F, Koenig G, Moschke K, Lichtenthaler SF, Herms J. BACE1 inhibitor MK-8931 alters formation but not stability of dendritic spines. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:229. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.https://www.alzforum.org/news/research-news/end-bace-inhibitors-elenbecestat-trials-halted-amid-safety-concerns. Accessed on 7 March 2021
  • 52.Timmers M, Streffer JR, Russu A, Tominaga Y, Shimizu H, Shiraishi A, Tatikola K, Smekens P, Börjesson-Hanson A, Andreasen N. Pharmacodynamics of atabecestat (JNJ-54861911), an oral BACE1 inhibitor in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Alzheimer's Res Therapy. 2018;10:1–18. doi: 10.1186/s13195-018-0415-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Koriyama Y, Hori A, Ito H, Yonezawa S, Baba Y, Tanimoto N, Ueno T, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto T, Asada N, Discovery of Atabecestat (JNJ-54861911) (2021) A thiazine-based β-amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 inhibitor advanced to the phase 2b/3 EARLY clinical trial, J Med Chem [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 54.Novak G, Streffer JR, Timmers M, Henley D, Brashear HR, Bogert J, Russu A, Janssens L, Tesseur I, Tritsmans L. Long-term safety and tolerability of atabecestat (JNJ-54861911), an oral BACE1 inhibitor, in early Alzheimer’s disease spectrum patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and a two-period extension study. Alzheimer's Res Therapy. 2020;12:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00614-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.U. Neumann, M. Ufer, L.H. Jacobson, M.L. Rouzade‐Dominguez, G. Huledal, C. Kolly, R.M. Lüönd, R. Machauer, S.J. Veenstra, K. Hurth, The BACE‐1 inhibitor CNP 520 for prevention trials in Alzheimer's disease, EMBO molecular medicine, 10 (2018) e9316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/novartis-amgen-and-banner-alzheimers-institute-discontinue-clinical-program-bace-inhibitor-cnp520-alzheimers-prevention. Accessed on 4 March 2021
  • 57.Siemers E, Skinner M, Dean RA, Gonzales C, Satterwhite J, Farlow M, Ness D, May PC. Safety, tolerability, and changes in amyloid β concentrations after administration of a γ-secretase inhibitor in volunteers. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2005;28:126–132. doi: 10.1097/01.wnf.0000167360.27670.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Folch J, Petrov D, Ettcheto M, Abad S, Sánchez-López E, García ML, Olloquequi J, Beas-Zarate C, Auladell C, Camins A. Current research therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Neural Plast. 2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/8501693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yiannopoulou KG, Papageorgiou SG. Current and future treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2013;6:19–33. doi: 10.1177/1756285612461679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dockens R, Wang J-S, Castaneda L, Sverdlov O, Huang S-P, Slemmon R, Gu H, Wong O, Li H, Berman RM. A placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of avagacestat (BMS-708163) in healthy young and elderly subjects. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:681–693. doi: 10.1007/s40262-012-0005-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Coric V, van Dyck CH, Salloway S, Andreasen N, Brody M, Richter RW, Soininen H, Thein S, Shiovitz T, Pilcher G. Safety and tolerability of the γ-secretase inhibitor avagacestat in a phase 2 study of mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2012;69:1430–1440. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.2194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Coman H, Nemeş B. New therapeutic targets in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Gerontol. 2017;11:2–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijge.2016.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Siopi E, Llufriu-Dabén G, Cho AH, Vidal-Lletjós S, Plotkine M, Marchand-Leroux C, Jafarian-Tehrani M. Etazolate, an α-secretase activator, reduces neuroinflammation and offers persistent neuroprotection following traumatic brain injury in mice. Neuropharmacology. 2013;67:183–192. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Endres K, Fahrenholz F, Lotz J, Hiemke C, Teipel S, Lieb K, Tüscher O, Fellgiebel A. Increased CSF APPs-α levels in patients with Alzheimer disease treated with acitretin. Neurology. 2014;83:1930–1935. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chang X, Rong C, Chen Y, Yang C, Hu Q, Mo Y, Zhang C, Gu X, Zhang L, He W. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate attenuates cognitive deterioration in Alzheimer׳ s disease model mice by upregulating neprilysin expression. Exp Cell Res. 2015;334:136–145. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bao J, Liu W, Zhou H-Y, Gui Y-R, Yang Y-H, Wu M-J, Xiao Y-F, Shang J-T, Long G-F, Shu X-J. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate alleviates cognitive deficits in APP/PS1 mice. Curr Med Sci. 2020;40:18–27. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2142-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.M. Ettcheto, A. Cano, P.R. Manzine, O. Busquets, E. Verdaguer, R.D. Castro-Torres, M.L. García, C. Beas-Zarate, J. Olloquequi, C. Auladell, Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) improves cognitive deficits aggravated by an obesogenic diet through modulation of unfolded protein response in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice, Molecular neurobiology, (2019) 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 68.https://www.alzforum.org/therapeutics/epigallocatechin-gallate-egcg, Accessed on 5 March 2021
  • 69.Wilcock GK, Black SE, Hendrix SB, Zavitz KH, Swabb EA, Laughlin MA. TPIS investigators, Efficacy and safety of tarenflurbil in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomised phase II trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:483–493. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70090-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Muntimadugu E, Dhommati R, Jain A, Challa VGS, Shaheen M, Khan W. Intranasal delivery of nanoparticle encapsulated tarenflurbil: a potential brain targeting strategy for Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016;92:224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Aisen PS, Gauthier S, Vellas B, Briand R, Saumier D, Laurin J, Garceau D. Alzhemed: a potential treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2007;4:473–478. doi: 10.2174/156720507781788882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hey JA, Kocis P, Hort J, Abushakra S, Power A, Vyhnálek M, Jeremy YY, Tolar M. Discovery and identification of an endogenous metabolite of tramiprosate and its prodrug ALZ-801 that inhibits beta amyloid oligomer formation in the human brain. CNS Drugs. 2018;32:849–861. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0554-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.https://www.greenvalleypharma.com/En/Index/pageView/catid/48/id/28.html, Accessed on 5 March 2021
  • 74.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04520412
  • 75.Wang T, Kuang W, Chen W, Xu W, Zhang L, Li Y, Li H, Peng Y, Chen Y, Wang B. A phase II randomized trial of sodium oligomannate in Alzheimer’s dementia. Alzheimer's Res Therapy. 2020;12:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00678-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sochocka M, Ochnik M, Sobczyński M, Siemieniec I, Orzechowska B, Naporowski P, Leszek J. New therapeutic targeting of Alzheimer’s disease with the potential use of proline-rich polypeptide complex to modulate an innate immune response-preliminary study. J Neuroinflam. 2019;16:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1520-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Szaniszlo P, German P, Hajas G, Saenz D, Kruzel M, Boldogh I. New insights into clinical trial for colostrinin™ in Alzheimer’s disease. JNHA. 2009;13:235–241. doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0065-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bilikiewicz A, Gaus W. Colostrinin 1 (a naturally occurring, proline-rich, polypeptide mixture) in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2004;6:17–26. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2004-6103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Delrieu J, Ousset PJ, Caillaud C, Vellas B. ‘Clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease’: immunotherapy approaches. J Neurochem. 2012;120:186–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07458.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Siemers ER, Sundell KL, Carlson C, Case M, Sethuraman G, Liu-Seifert H, Dowsett SA, Pontecorvo MJ, Dean RA, Demattos R. Phase 3 solanezumab trials: secondary outcomes in mild Alzheimer's disease patients. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12:110–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.06.1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ostrowitzki S, Lasser RA, Dorflinger E, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Nikolcheva T, Ashford E, Retout S, Hofmann C, Delmar P. A phase III randomized trial of gantenerumab in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer's Res Therapy. 2017;9:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0318-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tolar M, Abushakra S, Hey JA, Porsteinsson A, Sabbagh M. Aducanumab, gantenerumab, BAN2401, and ALZ-801—the first wave of amyloid-targeting drugs for Alzheimer’s disease with potential for near term approval. Alzheimer's Res Therapy. 2020;12:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00663-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Klein G, Delmar P, Voyle N, Rehal S, Hofmann C, Abi-Saab D, Andjelkovic M, Ristic S, Wang G, Bateman R. Gantenerumab reduces amyloid-β plaques in patients with prodromal to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a PET substudy interim analysis. Alzheimer's Res Therapy. 2019;11:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0559-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/fdas-decision-approve-new-treatment-alzheimers-disease. Accessed on 10 June 2021
  • 85.Biogen completes submission of Biologics License Application to FDA for aducanumab as a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. http://media.biogen.com/news-releases/news-release-details/biogen-completes-submission-biologics-license-application-fda. Accessed on 4 March 2021
  • 86.Aducanumab Decision Delayed for Three Months. https://www.alzforum.org/news/research-news/aducanumab-decision-delayed-three-months. Accessed on 4 March 2021
  • 87.Tucker S, Möller C, Tegerstedt K, Lord A, Laudon H, Sjödahl J, Söderberg L, Spens E, Sahlin C, Waara ER. The murine version of BAN2401 (mAb158) selectively reduces amyloid-β protofibrils in brain and cerebrospinal fluid of tg-ArcSwe mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43:575–588. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03887455
  • 89.Initiation of new phase iii clinical study (ahead 3–45) of ban2401 preclinical (asymptomatic) alzheimer’s disease. https://www.eisai.com/news/2020/news202042.html. Accessed on 12 March 2021
  • 90.Maqbool M, Mobashir M, Hoda N. Pivotal role of glycogen synthase kinase-3: a therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;107:63–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hampel H, Ewers M, Bürger K, Annas P, Mörtberg A, Bogstedt A, Frölich L, Schröder J, Schönknecht P, Riepe MW. Lithium trial in Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter 10-week study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70:922–931. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Cai Z, Zhao Y, Zhao B. Roles of glycogen synthase kinase 3 in Alzheimer's disease. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9:864–879. doi: 10.2174/156720512802455386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Beurel E, Grieco SF, Jope RS. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3): regulation, actions, and diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2015;148:114–131. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Alam J, Sharma L. Potential enzymatic targets in Alzheimer's: a comprehensive review. Curr Drug Targets. 2019;20:316–339. doi: 10.2174/1389450119666180820104723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wilcock GK, Gauthier S, Frisoni GB, Jia J, Hardlund JH, Moebius HJ, Bentham P, Kook KA, Schelter BO, Wischik DJ. Potential of low dose leuco-methylthioninium bis (hydromethanesulphonate)(LMTM) monotherapy for treatment of mild Alzheimer’s disease: Cohort analysis as modified primary outcome in a phase III clinical trial. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61:435–457. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Al-Hilaly YK, Pollack SJ, Rickard JE, Simpson M, Raulin A-C, Baddeley T, Schellenberger P, Storey JM, Harrington CR, Wischik CM. Cysteine-independent inhibition of Alzheimer's disease-like paired helical filament assembly by leuco-methylthioninium (LMT) J Mol Biol. 2018;430:4119–4131. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03446001
  • 98.Gandini A, Bartolini M, Tedesco D, Martinez-Gonzalez L, Roca C, Campillo NE, Zaldivar-Diez J, Perez CN, Zuccheri G, Miti A. Tau-centric multitarget approach for Alzheimer’s disease: development of first-in-class dual glycogen synthase kinase 3β and tau-aggregation inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2018;61:7640–7656. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Maurice T. Protection by sigma-1 receptor agonists is synergic with donepezil, but not with memantine, in a mouse model of amyloid-induced memory impairments. Behav Brain Res. 2016;296:270–278. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04314934
  • 101.Smith LM, Zhu R, Strittmatter SM. Disease-modifying benefit of Fyn blockade persists after washout in mouse Alzheimer's model. Neuropharmacology. 2018;130:54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Toyonaga T, Smith LM, Finnema SJ, Gallezot J-D, Naganawa M, Bini J, Mulnix T, Cai Z, Ropchan J, Huang Y. In vivo synaptic density imaging with 11C-UCB-J detects treatment effects of saracatinib in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1780–1786. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.223867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Van Dyck CH, Nygaard HB, Chen K, Donohue MC, Raman R, Rissman RA, Brewer JB, Koeppe RA, Chow TW, Rafii MS. Effect of AZD0530 on cerebral metabolic decline in Alzheimer disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:1219–1229. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wang X, Smith K, Pearson M, Hughes A, Cosden ML, Marcus J, Hess JF, Savage MJ, Rosahl T, Smith SM. Early intervention of tau pathology prevents behavioral changes in the rTg4510 mouse model of tauopathy. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0195486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Lee J-H, Liow J-S, Paul S, Morse CL, Haskali MB, Manly L, Shcherbinin S, Ruble JC, Kant N, Collins EC. PET quantification of brain O-GlcNAcase with [18 F] LSN3316612 in healthy human volunteers. EJNMMI Res. 2020;10:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13550-019-0588-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.D. Barthold, G. Joyce, W. Wharton, P. Kehoe, J. Zissimopoulos, The association of multiple anti-hypertensive medication classes with Alzheimer’s disease incidence across sex, race, and ethnicity, PloS one, 13 (2018) e0206705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 107.Kehoe PG. The coming of age of the angiotensin hypothesis in Alzheimer’s disease: progress toward disease prevention and treatment? J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62:1443–1466. doi: 10.3233/JAD-171119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.https://www.alzforum.org/therapeutics/telmisartan. Accessed on 12 March 2021
  • 109.Haditsch U, Roth T, Rodriguez L, Hancock S, Cecere T, Nguyen M, Arastu-Kapur S, Broce S, Raha D, Lynch CC. Alzheimer’s disease-like neurodegeneration in Porphyromonas gingivalis infected neurons with persistent expression of active gingipains. J Alzheimer's Dis. 2020;75(4):1361–1376. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Raha D, Broce S, Haditsch U, Rodriguez L, Ermini F, Detke M, Kapur S, Hennings D, Roth T, Nguyen M. COR388, a novel gingipain inhibitor, decreases fragmentation of APOE in the central nervous system of Alzheimer’s disease patients: Human/Human trials: Other. Alzheimer's Dementia. 2020;16:040578. doi: 10.1002/alz.040578. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.https://www.alzheimers.gov/alzheimers/clinical-trials/gain-trial-cor388-alzheimers-disease. Accessed on 12 March 2021
  • 112.https://www.alzforum.org/therapeutics/atuzaginstat. Accessed on 9 March 2021
  • 113.Novak P, Zilka N, Zilkova M, Kovacech B, Skrabana R, Ondrus M, Fialova L, Kontsekova E, Otto M, Novak M. AADvac1, an active immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease and non Alzheimer Tauopathies: an overview of preclinical and clinical development. J Prev Alzheimer's Dis. 2019;6:63–69. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2018.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Benito-León J, Contador I, Vega S, Villarejo-Galende A, Bermejo-Pareja F. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use in older adults decreases risk of Alzheimer’s disease mortality. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:0222505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Li T, Martin E, Abada Y-S, Boucher C, Cès A, Youssef I, Fenaux G, Forand Y, Legrand A, Nachiket N. Effects of chronic masitinib treatment in APPPS1dE9 transgenic mice modeling Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer's Dis. 2020;76(4):1339–1345. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.https://www.alzforum.org/news/research-news/positive-phase-2-results-claimed-masitinib-alzheimers. Accessed on 9 March 2021
  • 117.Erika G, Münch G. In search of an anti-inflammatory drug for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16:131–132. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0307-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Burstein A, Sabbagh M, Andrews R, Valcarce C, Dunn I, Altstiel L. Development of Azeliragon, an oral small molecule antagonist of the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts, for the potential slowing of loss of cognition in mild Alzheimer’s disease. J Prev Alzheimer's Dis. 2018;5:149–154. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2018.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02080364
  • 120.Deardorff WJ, Shobassy A, Grossberg GT. Safety and clinical effects of EVP-6124 in subjects with Alzheimer's disease currently or previously receiving an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor medication. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15:7–17. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.995639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.https://www.alzforum.org/news/research-news/rare-severe-side-effects-sideline-some-phase-3-encenicline-trials. Accessed on 9 March 2021
  • 122.Prior M, Dargusch R, Ehren JL, Chiruta C, Schubert D. The neurotrophic compound J147 reverses cognitive impairment in aged Alzheimer's disease mice. Alzheimer's Res Therapy. 2013;5:1–19. doi: 10.1186/alzrt179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Biology Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES