Skip to main content
Journal of the Endocrine Society logoLink to Journal of the Endocrine Society
. 2021 May 3;5(Suppl 1):A166–A167. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvab048.336

Results of the ADIUVO Study, the First Randomized Trial on Adjuvant Mitotane in Adrenocortical Carcinoma Patients

Massimo Terzolo 1, Martin Fassnacht 2, Paola Perotti 1, Rossella Libe 3, André Lacroix 4, Darko Kastelan 5, Harm Reinout Haak 6, Wiebke Arlt 7, Paola Loli 8, Bénédicte Decoudier 9, Helene Lasolle 10, Irina Bancos 11, Marcus Quinkler 12, Maria Candida Barisson Villares Fragoso 13, Letizia Canu 14, Soraya Puglisi 1, Matthias Kroiss 2, Tina Dusek 5, Isabelle Bourdeau 4, Eric Baudin 15, Paola Berchialla 16, Felix Beuschlein 17, Jerome Yves Bertherat 18, Alfredo Berruti 19
PMCID: PMC8265733

Abstract

Background: The ESE-ENSAT guidelines on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) suggest adjuvant mitotane for patients at high risk of recurrence following radical surgery. This indication has a limited evidence base, lacking results from randomized controlled trials. No suggestion for or against adjuvant mitotane in low-risk patients was given, since studies did not stratify patients for prognosis. The randomized controlled study ADIUVO compared the efficacy of adjuvant mitotane treatment vs. observation in prolonging recurrence-free survival (RFS) in ACC patients at low-intermediate risk of recurrence.

Methods: The main inclusion criteria were: stage I-III ACC, R0 surgery, and Ki-67 ≤10%. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to adjuvant mitotane (MIT) or observation (OBS). The primary endpoint of the study was RFS. Patients who refused randomization were offered inclusion in the ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL study. In this prospective, observational study, patients were managed as in the ADIUVO study. A total of 91 patients were enrolled in ADIUVO, 45 in the MIT and 46 in the OBS arm. Baseline characteristics of patients were perfectly matched between the 2 arms: median age, 51 vs. 50.5 years; female, 73% vs. 67%; stage I, 20% vs. 26%; stage II, 67% vs. 63%, stage III, 13% vs. 11%; ACC secretion 44% vs. 36%; Weiss 5 vs. 5; respectively. In ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL, 42 patients were treated with mitotane and 53 were untreated. Baseline characteristics of patients were matched between the 2 groups and with MIT and OBS groups in ADIUVO. Thus, the ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL cohorts could be analyzed in parallel to those of ADIUVO.

Results: In the ADIUVO study, recurrences were 8 in the MIT and 11 in the OBS arm, while deaths were 2 and 5, respectively. RFS and overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between the 2 arms. Tumor size was a predictor of RFS in multivariable analysis. In the OBS arm, the HR for recurrence was 1.321 (95%CI, 0.55–3.32, p=0.54) and HR for death 2.171 (95%CI, 0.52–12.12, p=0.29). The survival analysis in the ADIUVO OBSERVATIONAL study confirmed the findings of ADIUVO. Given the outcome of both studies, the NNT is 55.

Conclusions: ACC patients at low-intermediate risk of recurrence after surgery are a minority; however, they show a far better prognosis than expected (5-year RFS is about 75%) and do not benefit significantly from adjuvant mitotane. The results of the ADIUVO study do not support routine use of adjuvant mitotane in this subset of patients, who may thus avoid a potentially toxic treatment. This is an important step toward personalization of ACC care.


Articles from Journal of the Endocrine Society are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES