Abstract
Introduction
Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been considered as promising agents for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), previous clinical trials revealed that the response to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy was as low as 20%. Identifying subgroups that respond well to ICIs is clinically important. Here, we studied the prognostic factors for anti-PD-1 antibody treatment based on the molecular and immunological features of HCC.
Methods
Patients who were administered anti-PD1 antibody for advanced HCC at Kindai University Hospital were included. Clinicopathological backgrounds and antitumor responses were examined in 34 cases where tumor tissues before treatment were available. Transcriptome analysis was performed using 40 HCC samples obtained from surgical resection, and immune status was compared between 20 HCCs with activating mutations in β-catenin and those without the mutations using transcriptome-based immunogram.
Results
Univariate analysis showed that the disease control rate was significantly better in patients with α-fetoprotein < 400 ng/mL, negative for β-catenin/glutamate synthetase (GS) staining, high combined positive score (CPS) of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and increased infiltration of CD8<sup>+</sup> cells in tumor tissues. Among them, negative staining of β-catenin/GS, CPS of PD-L1 ≥ 1, and high degree of CD8<sup>+</sup> tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were significantly associated with longer survival in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The combination of these factors well stratified the survival of the patients on anti-PD-1 antibody in both PFS and OS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0048 for PFS and OS, respectively). In addition, the immunogram revealed that tumor-carrying mutations in β-catenin showed downregulation of immune-related genes, especially in those related to priming and activation by dendritic cells, interferon-γ response, inhibitory molecules, and regulatory T cells.
Discussion/Conclusion
The combined score including Wnt/β-catenin activation, CPS of PD-L1, and degree of CD8<sup>+</sup> TILs in HCC is informative for predicting the response to ICI in HCC cases. Constitutive activation of β-catenin can induce an immune cold phenotype with downregulation of immune-related genes, and immunohistochemistry-based evaluation is beneficial for identifying the subgroup that shows a good response to ICI.
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Wnt/β-Catenin pathway, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Survival, Immunological microenvironment
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide [1, 2]. Although there is recent progress in locoregional treatment of HCC, recurrence after curative treatment leads to tumor progression, where systemic chemotherapy is inevitable. Although several studies have reported the impact of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) on the survival of advanced HCC [3, 4, 5, 6, 7], the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations in cancer cells may result in the resistance of HCC to MTAs, where escape from the inhibitory effect on tumor growth by MTAs will occur. From this point of view, intervention in the immune microenvironment should be a promising approach for patients with advanced-stage HCC.
In recent years, several clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been performed in patients with HCC. A phase-I/II clinical trial (CheckMate 040) using the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibody nivolumab revealed an objective response rate (ORR) of 20% and disease control rate (DCR) of 64% in patients with advanced tumors in the 1st-line setting [8]. Another phase-II trial using the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-224) showed an ORR of 17% and DCR of 62% in patients who showed tumor progression on sorafenib [9]. However, the phase-III clinical trial failed to show positive results on survival using pembrolizumab in advanced HCC cases, although higher antitumor responses were observed in the groups treated with the anti-PD-1 antibody compared to the control groups [10, 11]. Collectively, almost 80% of the patients with HCC do not respond effectively to anti-PD-1 monotherapy, indicating that identification of a subgroup that would show a good response to ICIs is crucial for the management of HCC, especially in patients who fail to show antitumor response to MTAs.
On the other hand, recent reports suggest that Wnt/β-catenin signaling may be involved in the exclusion of CD8+ cells in tumor tissues in melanoma cases [12]. Ruiz de Galarreta et al. [13] showed the role of β-catenin activation in immune escape and resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in a mouse model of HCC. Harding et al. [14] also showed a negative impact of Wnt/β-catenin activation on DCR and progression-free survival (PFS) with anti-PD-1 therapy. Therefore, constitutive activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling, which is generally observed in around 30% of HCC by mutations of the genes involved in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [15], would be a promising marker for predicting immune resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in HCC cases. However, clinical evidence for the role of Wnt/β-catenin activation and subsequent acquisition of the “immune cold phenotype” that may affect the response to ICIs is still lacking in HCC cases. In this study, we focused on this clinical question and analyzed the status of Wnt/β-catenin activation, and factors associated with antitumor immunity on ICIs, such as expression of immune checkpoint molecules and infiltration of CD8+ cells, in HCC tissues of patients who underwent anti-PD-1 monotherapy thereafter. In addition, to determine the role of the activating mutation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling on immune phenotype, characteristics of the immunological microenvironment of HCCs were examined using the transcriptome data of HCC tissues in the context of activating mutations in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
Materials and Methods
Patients and Follow-Up Schedule
Between August 2015 and September 2017, 45 patients with advanced stage of HCC were treated with anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy under clinical trials and real-world clinical practice at Kindai University Hospital. Among them, HCC tissues before treatment were available for 35 patients; 34 were eligible for immunohistochemical evaluations. Details of the administration and follow-up schedule are shown in the see online suppl. Material and methods; see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000516899 for all online suppl. material. We analyzed the background of these 34 patients who received anti-PD-1 monotherapy and examined the prognosis, including DCR, ORR, PFS, and overall survival (OS).
We also collected data associated with tumor progression and systemic inflammation from blood examination, including α-fetoprotein (AFP), lymphocyte count, red blood cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) because these laboratory findings were reportedly associated with the tumor response to ICIs in other types of cancer [16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. Based on the previous reports, cut-off values of each blood chemical data for analyzing the efficacy of ICIs in tumor response were set as follows: baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL, lymphocyte count ≥1,000/µL, RDW ≥16%, NLR ≥5, PLR ≥200, and LDH ≥ upper normal limit, respectively [17, 18, 19, 20].
Evaluation of Effectiveness
Antitumor responses were evaluated by the attending physicians according to RECIST version 1.1 [21]. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) persisting for ≥4 months were considered as disease control (DC) based on the report regarding treatment using ICIs in patients with HCC [14]. Objective response was defined as PR or CR.
Immunohistochemistry
We reviewed formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor samples obtained from the HCC tissues before the treatment and confirmed the histology of HCC by at least 2 liver specialized pathologists. To determine the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, we examined the expression of β-catenin and its downstream target, glutamine synthetase (GS), using immunohistochemistry (IHC). It is reported that nuclear staining of β-catenin is associated with the activating mutation of the catenin beta-1 (CTNNB1) gene [22, 23, 24]. Furthermore, strong diffuse expression of GS reportedly reflects constitutive activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, that is attributed to the β-catenin mutation [25]. Therefore, the presence of nuclear staining of β-catenin in ≥5% of tumor cells [26, 27], or diffuse strong staining of GS were considered as positive findings for activation in Wnt/β-catenin signaling [27, 28, 29].
On the other hand, it is conceivable that infiltration of CD8+ lymphocytes in cancerous tissues and expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are also associated with the response of tumors to anti-PD-1 therapy because blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis should restore the antitumor immunity induced by CD8+ lymphocytes in tumors [30, 31]. For this purpose, we performed IHC for CD8 and PD-L1 using the same tissues examined for the expression of β-catenin and GS. We counted the number of PD-L1-positive cells in tumor and tumor-infiltrated cells to calculate the combined positive score (CPS) as reported previously, where CPS was determined as the number of PD-L1-positive cells (tumor cells, lymphocytes, and macrophages) divided by the total number of viable tumor cells × 100 [9]; CPS of PD-L1 (PD-L1-CPS) as reported previously [9]. The number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) expressing CD8 was also counted. Cells expressing β-catenin, GS, PD-L1, and CD8 were visually counted and quantified at 400-fold magnification. Based on the CPS shown in the results of phase-II clinical trial of pembrolizumab, where PD-L1-CPS was positively associated with antitumor response to ICIs, CPS ≥1 was defined as high PD-L1-CPS and CPS <1 was defined as low PD-L1-CPS [9]. Regarding the expression of CD8, the mean degree of CD8+ TILs was 28.4 cells/HPF (95% CI: 16.3–40.5) in tumors; values above the mean (28.4 cells/HPF) were defined as high degree of CD8+ TILs [30, 32]. Details of the conditions of the IHCs are shown in the online suppl. materials and methods.
Mutational and Transcriptome Analyses of HCC Tissues
Previously, we analyzed the mutational status of 154 HCC samples using the Ion AmpliSeqTM Comprehensive Cancer Panel that covered somatic mutations across 409 cancer-associated genes (Illumina®, San Diego, CA, USA) [31]. To determine the effect of activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway on the antitumor immune response of HCC tissues, we compared the gene expression that determined the immune status in tumors between those with the CTNNB1 mutation and those without mutations using 40 fresh-frozen HCC samples, where 20 were from HCC with activating CTNNB1 mutation and 20 were from those with wild-type CTNNB1. For the extraction of RNA from FFPE samples, we used the AllPrep DNA/RNA FFPE kit (QIAGEN, Venlo, the Netherlands). For library preparation of transcriptome analysis using next-generation sequencing, the Ion AmpliSeq Transcriptome Human Gene Expression Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. Sequencing was performed using the Ion 550 Kit and the Ion S5TM XL System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
For the comprehension of the immunological microenvironment of the tumor, we constructed the immunogram, a scoring system based on RNA-sequence data describing individual cancer-immunity interactions [33, 34, 35]. We performed single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) of these 40 tumors with 10 gene sets, innate immunity: natural killer cells (axis 1), priming and activation: dendritic cells (DCs) (axis 2), T cells: CD8+ T-cell response (axis 3), interferon-γ (IFNG) response (axis 4), inhibitory molecules (axis 5), inhibitory cells (regulatory T cells, axis 6), inhibitory cells (myeloid-derived suppressor cells, axis 7), recognition of tumor cells, antigen processing and presentation (axis 8), proliferation (axis 9), and glycolysis (axis 10), as described previously [34]. We obtained the mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) of the ssGSEA scores of the 40 HCC patients for each gene set. The immunogram score (IGS) for each axis was calculated as IGS = 3 + 1.5 × (ssGSEA score − M)/SD [34]. This formula was applied to all the axes of the immunogram in each patient. To depict immunograms on radar chart, the lower and upper limits of the IGS were set at 1 and 5, respectively.
Statistics
We used Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for the comparison of categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Nominal logistic regression analysis was used for the multivariate analysis. For the survival analysis, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used, and the p value was calculated using the log-rank test. The details of the immunogram, shown using radar charts, have been reported previously [34]; hierarchical clustering analysis was performed using IGS and for the characterization of the transcriptome-based immune status of HCC with the CTNNB1 mutation. All p values were 2-sided, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using the JMP v.14 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Backgrounds of the Patients
Clinical backgrounds of the patients are as follows: the average age was 67.1 years, 28 patients were male, and 6 were female. Nine patients were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen, and 13 were positive for hepatitis C antibody. Sixteen HCCs were well differentiated, and 18 were moderately to poorly differentiated tumors. Portal vein tumor thrombus and extrahepatic spread were observed in 10 and 14 patients, respectively. Fourteen patients had tumors with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B and 20 patients with BCLC stage C. Regarding background liver function, all cases were Child-Pugh grade A. Among them, 13 had a history of pretreatment with sorafenib, and 21 had none (Table 1).
Table 1.
Backgrounds of the patients in this study
| Clinocopathological backgrounds | Distribution |
|---|---|
| Age: median, distribution, years old | 67.1, 40–80 |
| Sex (male/female) | 28/6 |
| ECOG performance status (PS0/PS1) | 33/1 |
| HBV (yes/no) | 9/25 |
| HCV (yes/no) | 13/21 |
| Differentiation (well/moderately − poorly) | 16/18 |
| PVTT (yes/no) | 10/24 |
| EHS (yes/no) | 14/20 |
| BCLC stage (B/C) | 14/20 |
| Pretreatment of sorafenib (yes/no) | 13/21 |
| Serum AFP level: median, distribution, ng/mL | 1,634.4, 3.0–92,360 |
| Lymphocyte count: median, distribution, /µL | 1,073.5, 251–2,265 |
| RDW: median, distribution, % | 14.5, 11.9–21.7 |
| NLR: median, distribution | 2.6, 1.1–5.1 |
| PLR: median, distribution | 123.6, 51–287.1 |
| LDH: median, distribution, U/L | 265, 180–582 |
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombus; EHS, extrahepatic spread; BCLC stage, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage; AFP, α-fetoprotein; RDW, red blood cell distribution width; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.
IHC of β-catenin, Glutamine Synthetase, PD-L1, and CD8 in HCC Tissues
We performed IHC for the expression of β-catenin, GS, PD-L1, and CD8 in HCC tissues before anti-PD-1 therapy (Fig. 1). Nine out of 34 (26.5%) were positive for nuclear staining for β-catenin, 11 out of 34 were positive for diffuse strong staining of GS; collectively, activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway was considered to be positive in 14 of the 34 cases (41.2%). Similarly, cases with high-degree CD8+ TILs were observed in 9 out of 34 (26.5%); the number of patients with high PD-L1-CPS was 13 of 30 (43.3%) of the cases (Table 2).
Fig. 1.
Representative images of each immunostaining. Representative images of nuclear staining of β-catenin (a), strong diffuse expression of GS (b), expression of PD-L1 on cell membranes (c), and infiltration of CD8+ lymphocytes in cancerous tissues (d) by IHC. Scale bar, 50 μm. GS, glutamate synthetase; IHC, immunohistochemistry.
Table 2.
Association between clinicopathological findings and achievement of DC on the treatment with anti-PD-1 antibody in HCC patients
| Clinocopathological categories | DC |
p value for univariate analysis1 | p value for multivariate analysis2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| with | without | |||
| Clinical backgrounds | ||||
| Age (<65/≥65) | 5/10 | 5/14 | 0.7176* | |
| Sex (male/female) | 12/3 | 16/3 | 1.0000* | |
| ECOG performance status (PS0/PS1) | 15/0 | 18/1 | 1.0000* | |
| HBV (yes/no) | 4/11 | 5/14 | 1.0000* | |
| HCV (yes/no) | 6/9 | 7/12 | 0.8508 | |
| Degree of differentiation (well/moderately − poorly) | 5/10 | 11/8 | 0.1542 | |
| PVTT (yes/no) | 4/11 | 6/13 | 1.0000* | |
| EHS (yes/no) | 6/9 | 8/11 | 0.9014 | |
| BCLC stage (B/C) | 6/9 | 8/11 | 0.9014 | |
| Pretreatment of sorafenib (yes/no) | 8/7 | 5/14 | 0.1075 | |
| Baseline blood chemical findings | ||||
| AFP (high [≥400 ng/mL]/low [<400 ng/mL]) | 5/10 | 14/5 | 0.0186 | 0.1498 |
| Lymphocyte count (high [≥1,000/µL]/low [<1,000/µL]) | 8/7 | 11/8 | 0.7903 | |
| RDW (high [≥16%]/low [<16%]) | 4/11 | 3/16 | 0.6722* | |
| NLR (high [≥5]/low (<5]) | 1/14 | 3/16 | 0.6128* | |
| PLR (high [≥200]/low (<200]) | 4/11 | 3/16 | 0.6722* | |
| LDH (high [≥upper normal limit/low [<upper normal limit]) | 9/6 | 11/8 | 0.9014 | |
| IHC | ||||
| Wnt/β-catenin activation (positive/negative) | 2/13 | 12/7 | 0.0034 | 0.0509 |
| Grade of CD8+ TILs (high/low) | 7/8 | 2/17 | 0.0252* | 0.4732 |
| PD-L1-CPS (high [≥1]/low [<1]) | 8/4 | 5/13 | 0.0352 | 0.0939 |
Univariate analysis revealed that AFP ≥400 ng/mL was negatively associated with DC (p = 0.0186). In addition, based on the immunohistochemical analyses, Wnt/β-catenin activation, which was determined by the nuclear staining of the β-catenin and/or strong diffuse staining of the glutamine synthetase, was negatively, and high CPS of PD-L1 (PD-L1-CPS) and high grade of CD8+ TILs were positively associated with achievement of DC on anti-PD-1 antibody (p = 0.0034, for Wnt/β-catenin activation, p = 0.0352 for PD-L1-CPS, p = 0.0252 for CD8+ TILs, respectively. Although, no items revealed independently associated with achievement of DC in multivariate analysis, status of Wnt/ β-catenin activation could mostly affect the achieving DC on anti-PD-1 antibody (p = 0.0509). ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombus; EHS, extrahepatic spread; BCLC stage, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage; well, well differentiated; moderately poorly, moderately differentiated or poorly differentiated; AFP, α-fetoprotein; RDW, red blood cell distribution width; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte; PD-L1-CPS, combined positive score of programmed cell death-ligand 1; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; DC, disease control; IHC, immunochemistry.
p value by Pearson's Χ2 test or Fisher's exact test (The asterisk shows p value by Fisher's exact test). Bolds denote the p value <0.05.
p value by logistic regression analysis.
Association between Clinicopathological Backgrounds and Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in HCC
Regarding the best response of the 34 patients who received anti-PD-1 monotherapy, CR, PR, SD, and PD were observed in 3, 2, 10, and 19 patients, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that AFP ≥400 ng/mL was negatively associated with DC (p = 0.0186 by Pearson's χ2 test; Table 2). In addition, based on the IHC analyses, we found that Wnt/β-catenin activation was negatively, and high degree of CD8+ TILs and high PD-L1-CPS were positively associated with achievement of DC on anti-PD-1 antibody (p = 0.0034, for Wnt/β-catenin activation, p = 0.0252 for CD8+ TILs and p = 0.0352 for PD-L1-CPS, respectively; Table 2). Subsequently, we performed multivariate analysis using serum AFP level, activation status of Wnt/β-catenin, degree of CD8+ TILs, and PD-L1-CPS as covariables. Although no items were independently associated with achievement of DC, the status of Wnt/β-catenin activation showed a borderline association (p = 0.0509 by nominal logistic regression analysis, Fig. 2) and could mostly affect the achievement of DC on anti-PD-1 antibody, where the negative for Wnt/β-catenin activation showed an odds ratio (OR) of 6.93 (95% CI: 0.83–57.78), followed by that for high PD-L1-CPS (OR = 4.87, 95% CI: 0.70–33.94), AFP <400 ng/mL (OR = 3.86, 95% CI; 0.57–26.07), and high-degree CD8+ TILs (OR = 2.17, 95% CI; 0.26–18.35, Fig. 2). It is also reasonable to speculate that most benefit of immune therapy is derived from the patients with objective responses. Therefore, we analyzed association between objective response and clinicopathological findings although the number of the cases with objective response is small (n = 5). Univariate analysis revealed that RDW ≥16% showed a borderline association with objective response (p = 0.0476 by Fisher's exact test, online suppl. Table 1).
Fig. 2.
Multivariate analysis and ORs for achievement of DC for Wnt/β-catenin activation, PD-L1-CPS, CD8+TILs, and serum AFP level. Multivariate analysis in DC was performed for Wnt/β-catenin activation, combined with degree of CD8+ TILs, positive score of PD-L1 (PD-L1-CPS), and serum AFP level. Although no statistically significant difference was observed, the absence of Wnt/β-catenin activation showed the highest OR = 6.93. DC, disease control; CPS, combined positive score; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte; OR, odds ratio; AFP, α-fetoprotein; DC, disease control.
As absence of Wnt/β-catenin activation was associated with DC in univariate analysis and showed borderline association in multivariate analysis, we compared the background of the patients carrying HCCs with Wnt/β-catenin activation and those without activation with respect to relevant clinical and prognostic parameters. Univariate analysis revealed that RDW ≥16% was negatively associated with Wnt/β-catenin activation and low grade of CD8+ TILs showed borderline association (p = 0.0262, and p = 0.0504 for RDW ≥16% and grade of CD8+ TILs, respectively, by Fisher's exact test, online suppl. Table 2).
Survival of the Patients Stratified by the Expression of Wnt/β-Catenin Activation, PD-L1 Expression, CD8+ Cell Infiltration on PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade
Next, we examined the survival of the patients classified based on IHC findings as shown in Figure 3 depicting the survival curve of HCC patients after the initiation of anti-PD-1 monotherapy. No deaths occurred before PD judgment. The median PFS and 95% CI were as follows: median PFS durations were 56.5 days (95% CI: 42–89) and 231 days (95% CI: 115–547) in patients with positive for activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and those with negative for activation, respectively (p < 0.0001 by log-rank test, Fig. 3a). Similarly, the median PFS was 297 days (95% CI: 89–514) and 58 days (95% CI: 54–115) in patients with PD-L1-CPS ≥1 and those with PD-L1-CPS <1 (p = 0.0109, Fig. 3b); median PFS durations were 246 days (95% CI: 84–1,064) and 89 days (95% CI: 56–164) in patients with a high degree of CD8+ TILs and those with a low degree of CD8+ TILs, respectively (p = 0.0344, Fig. 3c).
Fig. 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS on anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with HCC. PFS after the initiation of anti-PD-1 antibody administration was compared between HCC patients with positive and negative for activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (a), PD-L1-CPS ≥1 and PD-L1-CPS <1 (b), and a high degree of CD8+ TILs and a low degree of CD8+ TILs (c). The median PFS and 95% CI were as follows: median durations of PFS were 56.5 days (95% CI: 42–89) and 231 days (95% CI: 115–547) in patients with positive for activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (β-catenin activation +) and those with negative for activation (β-catenin activation -), respectively (p < 0.0001 by log-rank test; panel a). Similarly, the median PFS was 297 days (95% CI: 89–514) and 58 days (95% CI: 54–115) in patients with a CPS of PD-L1 (PD-L1-CPS) ≥ 1 and those with PD-L1-CPS <1 (p = 0.0109; panel b); median PFS durations were 246 days (95% CI: 84–1,064) and 89 days (95% CI: 56–164) in patients with a high degree of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ cells (CD8+ high) and those with a low degree of tumor-infiltrated CD8+ cells (CD8+ low), respectively (p = 0.0344; panel c). HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CPS, combined positive score; PFS, progression-free survival; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte.
There was no significant difference in PFS among patients classified by serum AFP level. The median duration of PFS was 84 days (95% CI: 56–164) and 210 days (95% CI: 55–460) (p = 0.2677 by log-rank test, online suppl. Fig. 1a) in patients with AFP ≥400 ng/mL and those with AFP <400 ng/mL.
The median OS and 95% CI of each subgroup were as follows: median OS was 432 days (95% CI: 103–487) and 764 days (95% CI: 315–1,021) in patients with positive for activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and those with negative for activation, respectively (p = 0.0003 by log-rank test, Fig. 4a). Similarly, the median durations of OS and their 95% CI were 793 days (95% CI: 315–1,163) and 432 days (95% CI: 170–493) in patients with PD-L1-CPS ≥1 and those with PD-L1-CPS <1, respectively (p = 0.0204, Fig. 4b); median OS was 1,021 days (95% CI: 170-not determined) and 487 days (95% CI: 238–532) in patients with a high degree of CD8+ TILs and those with a low degree of CD8+ TILs (p = 0.0089, Fig. 4c), respectively. The median duration of OS was 430 days (95% CI: 187–532) and 668.5 days (95% CI: 466–1,163) in patients with AFP ≥400 ng/mL and those with AFP <400 ng/mL (p = 0.0289 by log-rank test, online suppl. Fig. 1b).
Fig. 4.
Kaplan-Meier curves of OS on anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with HCC. The OS after the initiation of anti-PD-1 antibody was compared between HCC patients with positive and negative for activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (a), PD-L1-CPS ≥1 and PD-L1-CPS <1 (b), and a high degree of CD8+ TILs and a low degree of CD8+ TILs (c). The median OS and their 95% CI of each subgroup were as follows: median OS, 432 days (95% CI: 103–487), and 764 days (95% CI: 315–1,021) in patients with positive for the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (β-catenin activation +) and those with negative for activation of this pathway (β-catenin activation -), respectively (p = 0.0003 by log-rank test; panel a). The median durations of OS and their 95% CI were 793 days (95% CI: 315–1,163) and 432 days (95% CI: 170–493) in patients with a CPS of PD-L1 (PD-L1-CPS) ≥ 1 and those with PD-L1-CPS <1, respectively (p = 0.0204; panel b); median OS was 1,021 days (95% CI: 170 − not determined) and 487 days (95% CI: 238–532) in patients with a high degree of tumor-infiltrated CD8+ cells (CD8+ high) and those with a low degree of tumor-infiltrated CD8+ cells (CD8+ low) (p = 0.0089; panel c), respectively. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CPS, combined positive score; OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte.
Combined Immunohistochemical Findings for Wnt/β-Catenin Activation, Expression of PD-L1, and Infiltration of CD8+ Cells Stratified by the Prognosis of Patients with HCC on anti-PD-1 Antibody
In this analysis, we performed the assignment for Wnt/β-catenin activation, PD-L1-CPS, and infiltration of CD8+ cells through IHC and found that the absence of staining for β-catenin or GS represented the most valuable risk for favorable prognosis of HCC patients on anti-PD-1 therapy. However, high PD-L1-CPS and high degree of CD8+ TILs are also associated with a good tumor response to anti-PD-1 antibody. As IHC analyses sometimes yielded false-negative results because of the heterogeneity of staining in the tissue, and expression of PD-L1 and infiltration of CD8+ cells are also considered to be important for antitumor response to anti-PD-1 therapy, we assigned high PD-L1-CPS and high-degree CD8+ TILs, in addition to the negative staining of β-catenin or GS, as positive prognostic factors on ICIs, and studied the impact of accumulation of these 3 items on the prognosis of patients who received anti-PD-1 antibody. As shown in Figure 5, the median duration of PFS and 95% CI for patients without any positive prognostic factors, those with 1 positive prognostic factor, and those with 2 or more factors were 55 days (95% CI: 37–100), 89 days (95% CI; 42–460), and 271.5 days (95% CI; 136–547), respectively (p < 0.0001 by log-rank test, Fig. 5a). Similarly, the median duration of OS and 95% CI for patients without any positive prognostic factors, those with 1 positive prognostic factor, and those with 2 or more factors were 432 days (95% CI: 73–493), 479.5 days (95% CI; 187–547), and 859 days (95% CI; 225–1,163), respectively (p = 0.0048, Fig. 5b). This evidence suggests that comprehensive assessment of Wnt/β-catenin activation and immune-related molecules could represent the immunological status that affects the response to anti-PD-1 therapy; assessment of IHC could be a useful tool for selecting patients who may respond well to ICIs.
Fig. 5.
Kaplan-Meier curves for survival classified based on the number of positive prognostic factors in patients with HCC. Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS and OS stratified by the members of positive prognostic factors are shown in (a, b), respectively. a The median duration of PFS and 95% CI for patients without any positive prognostic factors (positive prognostic factor = 0), those with one positive prognostic factor (positive prognostic factors = 1), and those with 2 or more factors (positive prognostic factors = 2–3) were 55 days (95% CI; 37–100), 89 days (95% CI; 42–460), and 271.5 days (95% CI; 136–547), respectively (p < 0.0001 by log-rank test). b The median duration of OS and 95% CI for patients without any positive prognostic factors, those with one positive prognostic factor, and those with 2 or more factors were 432 days (95% CI; 73–493), 479.5 days (95% CI; 187–547), and 859 days (95% CI; 225–1,163), respectively (p = 0.0048). HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival.
Evaluation of the Immunological Microenvironment Using Transcriptome-Based Immunogram in HCC with and without Activating Mutations in the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway
Constitutive activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in HCC is mostly due to mutations in the CTNNB1 gene [15, 36, 37]. The immunograms represent the 10 kinds of immune status classified using the ssGSEA and were shown in radar chart (online suppl. Fig. 2a). Each immunogram for 20 HCCs with mutation in the CTNNB1 gene and 20 HCCs without mutation in the CTNNB1 gene was shown in online suppl. Fig. 2b, c, respectively. We compared the IGS of each axis of the immunogram between 20 HCCs with mutations in CTNNB1 and 20 HCCs without mutations in CTNNB1 (Table 3). Among the 10 axes that represent the corresponding molecular profiles shown in the immunogram, no significant differences were found in axis 1 (innate immunity, p = 0.0884 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test), axis 3 (T cells, p = 0.0699), axis 7 (inhibitory cells [myeloid-derived suppressor cells], p = 0.0583), axis 8 (recognition of tumor cells, p = 0.1517), axis 9 (proliferation, p = 0.0989), and axis 10 (glycolysis, p = 0.3040). However, we found significant differences in axis 2 (priming and activation, p = 0.0020), axis 4 (IFNG response, p = 0.0011), axis 5 (inhibitory molecules, p = 0.0265), and axis 6 (inhibitory cells [regulatory T cells], p = 0.0029) (Table 3). Subsequently, we performed multivariate analysis using the IGS of each axis that showed a difference in univariate analysis for the mutational status of the CTNNB1 gene and found significant differences in axis 4 (IFNG response, p = 0.0490; Table 3).
Table 3.
Presence or absence of the CTNNB1 mutation and immune status defined by the immunogram
| Immune status by immunogram | CTNNB1 mutation | IGS median (distribution) | p value for univariate analysis1 | p value for multivariate analysis2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innate immunity (axis 1) | With Without |
2.0 (1.2–5.9) 3.5 (0.9–8.2) |
0.0884 | |
| Priming and activation (axis 2) | With Without |
2.2 (0.1–4.8) 3.8 (1.4–7.0) |
0.00203 | 0.5271 |
| T cells (axis 3) | With Without |
2.4 (1.0–5.7) 3.3 (1.1–7.4) |
0.0699 | |
| Interferon-γ response (axis 4) | With Without |
1.9 (0.7–4.4) 3.8 (1.5–6.2) |
0.0011 | 0.0490 |
| Inhibitory molecules (axis 5) | With Without |
2.2 (–0.3–5.2) 3.7 (0.6–5.7) |
0.0265 | 0.1173 |
| Inhibitory cells (Tregs) (axis 6) | With Without |
2.2 (1.1–4.3) 3.2 (1.3–8.4) |
0.0029 | 0.8489 |
| Inhibitory cells (MDSCs) (axis 7) | With Without |
2.3 (0.1–5.1) 3.9 (0.6–6.3) |
0.0583 | |
| Recognition of tumor cells (axis 8) | With Without |
2.5 (0.1–4.5) 3.2 (1.3–6.3) |
0.1517 | |
| Proliferation (axis 9) | With Without |
3.1 (–1.9–4.5) 3.4 (1.2–5.4) |
0.0989 | |
| Glycolysis (axis 10) | With Without |
2.8 (0.6–5.4) 3.0 (0.1–6.7) |
0.3040 | |
HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; IGS, immunogram score; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; Tregs, regulatory T cells. The IGS was compared between HCCs with and without mutation of the CTNNB1 gene in each axis of the immunological diagram. Twenty HCCs with and without CTNNB1 mutation, respectively, were analyzed for immunogram. Among the 10 axes that represent the corresponding molecular profiles shown in the immunogram, significant differences were found in the IGS of axis 2, axis 4, axis 5, and axis 6 depending on presence or absence of the CTNNB1 gene mutation. Multivariate analysis showed a significant difference for IGS in axis 4 (p = 0.0490).
p value by Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
p value by logistic regression analysis.
Bolds denote the p value <0.05.
We performed hierarchical clustering analysis using IGS of each axis corresponding to the stage of the immune response, and successfully detected 2 clusters (cluster 1 and cluster 2) on a heatmap (online suppl. Fig. 3a); HCCs with CTNNB1 mutation tended to be predominant in cluster 1 that showed lower expression of immune-related genes, which should be attributed to the lower infiltration of immune cells (p = 0.0578 by Pearson's χ2 test, online suppl. Fig. 3b).
Discussion/Conclusion
Recent developments in systemic chemotherapy for HCC have improved the prognosis of patients with advanced HCC. For example, phase-III clinical trials for several MTAs, such as lenvatinib, sorafenib, regorafenib, ramucirumab, and cabozantinib have revealed the considerable effect of MTAs on survival [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. However, acquired mutations in cancer cells induce resistance to TKIs because of the development of the escape pathway. On the other hand, ICIs are promising agents for the treatment of HCC, even in patients who show resistance to TKIs. It modulates the immune suppressive microenvironment, where mutations that induce resistance to ICI may rarely occur [38]. However, although phase-I/II clinical trial (CheckMate 040) and another phase-II clinical trial (KEYNOTE-224) of ICIs for HCC showed promising effects on survival, the phase-III clinical trial failed to show a superior effect on survival in patients who were treated with anti-PD-1 antibody compared to the control groups [8, 9, 10]. Based on the reports of the trials, around 20% of the patients showed tumor response to ICI monotherapies, suggesting that ICIs could be beneficial in a subset of patients with HCC, and currently, no effective biomarker has been established for predicting the effect of ICIs. It has also been reported that PD-L1 expression in tumors is associated with tumor response to this type of agent [20], indicating that the status of the tumor microenvironment is important to draw a benefit on ICI treatments. From this point of view, understanding the immunological microenvironment in HCC is required to develop biomarkers for ICIs in HCC treatment. In this study, we clearly showed that simple IHC-based analyses for evaluating immunological status could stratify the survival of patients with HCC on ICIs.
We examined the association between the data from the blood chemical test and tumor response to anti-PD-1 antibody. In our study, a significant association was observed between lower serum AFP levels and DC. Another report also showed that patients with serum AFP levels <400 ng/mL tended to show a longer survival than those with serum AFP level ≥400 ng/mL on anti-PD-1 therapy [20]. In addition, other markers for systemic inflammation, such as elevated NLR and PLR, are also reportedly associated with poor prognosis in HCC [20]. Although we failed to show an association between NLR and PLR and tumor response, relatively small number of the analyzed cases may be attributed to the negative findings for the association between NLR, PLR, and tumor response. In contrast, lymphocyte count, RDW, and LDH have also been reported to be associated with a good response to ICI in lung cancer and melanoma cases [16, 17, 18, 19]. In this study, we did not find any associations between these laboratory data and DCR in HCC cases although cases with high RDW were more frequent in patients who showed objective response (online suppl. Table 1). A larger cohort is required to determine the role of markers related to systemic inflammation as a biomarker of ICIs in HCC cases.
On the other hand, we found significant association between negative staining related to Wnt/β-catenin activation, high grade of CD8+ TILs, and high PD-L1-CPS and DC. However, as the benefits of ICI are presumed to be large in the case of objective response, we also analyzed the relationship between clinical parameters and an achievement of objective response; borderline association was observed only for high RDW. It is possible that the number of objective response cases in this cohort was small that might not be enough for statistical analyses. A previous report also evaluated the impact of Wnt/β-catenin activation on anti-PD-1 therapy using DCR because ICI can be expected to have a long-term effect even in SD cases [14]. Therefore, it is reasonable to focus on DCR for tumor response, which may well reflect the longer survival on ICIs; further study with larger cohort containing more cases with objective response is required.
Contrastingly, it has been suggested that immune hot status is critical for the successful treatment of cancer with ICI [39, 40]. In this context, currently, several studies showed the immune subclass of HCC based on the expression of cytokine, chemokine, immune checkpoint molecules, and infiltration of immune cells in the tumor [27, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45]. In addition, constitutive activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway has been reported to be associated with the immune cold phenotype of cancer, including HCC [12, 13]. Harding et al. [14] reported that HCC patients with activating mutations of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in tumors showed shorter PFS than those without mutations on treatment with ICIs. Recently, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy was revealed to show a superior effect on antitumor response rate compared to ICI monotherapy [8, 9, 10, 46]. From this point of view, it is intriguing to know the efficacy of combination of ICI with MTA on HCCs carrying Wnt/β-catenin activation.
We also found that the absence of staining of the molecules in Wnt/β-catenin signaling, high infiltration of CD8+ cells, and high CPS of PD-L1 were all significant contributors to the antitumor response on anti-PD-1 antibody. In addition, these findings were also associated with good prognosis. In this context, we hypothesized accumulation of these favorable factors might show an impact on the survival of the patients. As expected, the accumulation of these factors defined by IHC well stratifies the survival of HCC patients on anti-PD-1 antibody, suggesting that the immunological microenvironment should affect the survival of patients with HCC and IHC for assessing the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, degree of CD8+ TILs, and expression of PD-L1 is a simple and effective way to select patients who benefit from anti-PD-1 antibody.
Finally, among the ORs of Wnt/β-catenin activation, the degree of CD8+ TIL and PD-L1-CPS on DCR that of Wnt/β-catenin activation showed the highest value, suggesting the impact of role of Wnt/β-catenin signaling on the effect of ICIs in HCC cases. To clarify the characteristics of HCC with activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, we compared the immune status of tumors between HCCs with activating mutations in the CTNNB1 gene and those without mutation using transcriptome-based immunogram, where 10 molecular profiles that represent the characteristics of each immune step can be visualized [34]. In the HCC with CTNNB1 mutation, in addition to the IGS related to the priming and activation, IGS of the IFNG response, inhibitory molecules, and inhibitory cells were significantly lower in HCCs carrying the CTNNB1 mutation than in those without mutations, where the IFNG response showed the most prominent difference. This evidence clearly supports the idea that activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is associated with an immune cold phenotype with fewer infiltrating immune cells in tumor. On the contrary, tumors without CTNNB1 mutation may carry enough TILs, a subset of such HCC may have TILs showing an exhausted phenotype because the IGS of the inhibitory molecules (axis 5) and inhibitory cells (axis 6) is high in HCC without CTNNB1 mutation compared to those with the mutation, as suggested previously [31, 45, 47, 48].
We found a considerable effect of anti-PD-1 antibody on HCC cases with a lack of β-catenin activation, suggesting that blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis might, at least partially, overcome the presence of exhausted TILs with other immunosuppressive molecules. Although the classification of HCCs using the hierarchical clustering analysis based on the IGS showed borderline significance for the association between the transcriptome-based immune phenotype and CTNNB1 mutation (p = 0.0578, online suppl. Fig. 3b), 2 axes that could be affected by the characteristics of cancer cells (axis 9 that represented proliferation and axis 10 showing glycolysis) were also involved in the immunogram, which might make the association between the transcriptome-based immune classification and CTNNB1 mutation obscure. Indeed, classification with hierarchical clustering analysis using IGS from axis 1 to 8 represented a significant difference in this association (data not shown). In addition, the expression of IFNG, which induces the expression of PD-L1 [49], was enhanced in HCC without β-catenin mutation. This evidence clearly supports the idea that the Wnt/β-catenin pathway plays an important role in determining the immunological microenvironment of HCC.
The limitation of this study includes the fact that only 34 cases were analyzed, and most of the tissue was obtained from liver biopsy specimens, where heterogeneity of staining in IHC was observed. It is possible that there was a false-negative result for immune staining of immune-related molecules because of its heterogeneity in expression. Indeed, although the immunogram suggests the relationship between the mutation of CTNNB1 and immune cold phenotype, the IHC fails to show the significant association between the activation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway and low grade of CD8+ TILs and PD-L1-CPS, although the HCCs with Wnt/β-catenin activation tend to carry low CD8+ TILs and PD-L1 expressions (online suppl. Table 2). Therefore, we believe that counting the total number of IHC findings, β-catenin/GS, CD8, and PD-L1 expression could minimize the false-negative results in terms of the presence of an immune cold phenotype. Another limitation of this study is only the limited molecules have been analyzed for evaluating immunological microenvironments of HCC. For example, several oncogenic signals are known to affect antitumor immunity [50]. Regarding HCC cases, a functional link between mutation of ARID2 and chemokine production related to tumor-associated macrophage, which led to noninflamed tumor, was reported [51]. Inactivation of Hippo pathway in HCC is also known to induce immune suppressive status through the induction of tumor-associated macrophage due to the expression of C-C motif chemokine 2 by yes-associated protein in mouse model [52]. Even in HCCs with enough TILs, a recent report showed that tumor related to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) might be less responsive to ICIs, probably owing to the NASH-related aberrant T-cell activation that resulted in the impaired immune surveillance [53]. Because of the complexity of the antitumor immunity, data based on multi-omics analysis might be more informative for developing innovative biomarker of ICIs. Nevertheless, predicting the prognosis of HCC patients on ICIs by simple IHC evaluations is clinically significant because, currently, there are no biomarkers, and analysis using IHC is cost-effective compared to omics-based analysis. This result is considered beneficial for selecting the appropriate agents for personalized medicine in HCC treatment.
Statement of Ethics
The research was conducted ethically in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. We used archived tissue samples for this study that were obtained with patient's written consent. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kindai University Hospital (IRB approved number: #31–145).
Conflict of Interest Statement
Masatoshi Kudo reports honoraria and consulting or advisory fees from Bayer AG, Roche, and Eisai Co. Ltd.; honoraria from Bayer AG, Bristol Myers Squibb, EA Pharma Co., Ltd., Eisai Co. Ltd., and Merck Sharp & Dohme; and research funding from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Merck Sharp & Dohme, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., and Taiho Pharmaceutical. M.K. is an Editor-in-Chief, and N.N. is an Editorial Board member of Liver Cancer.
Funding Sources
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI: 16K09382, N. Nishida, and 18K07922, M Kudo) and a grant from Smoking Research Foundation (N. Nishida).
Author Contributions
Study concept and design: N.N. Acquisition of data: M.M., N.N., K.S., T.A., H.C., T.M., M.T., S.H., Y.M., H.I., K.U., and M.K. Analysis and interpretation of the data: M.M., N.N., K.S., K.N., Y.K., and K.K. Drafting of the manuscript: M.M. and N.N. Revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: all authors. Statistical analysis: M.M. and N.N. Study supervision: N.N. and M.K.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary data
References
- 1.Altekruse SF, Henley SJ, Cucinelli JE, McGlynn KA. Changing hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and liver cancer mortality rates in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;109((4)):542–53. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65((2)):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 24;359((4)):378–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P, Granito A, Huang YH, Bodoky G, et al. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389((10064)):56–66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32453-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Mar 24;391((10126)):1163–73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhu AX, Kang YK, Yen CJ, Finn RS, Galle PR, Llovet JM, et al. Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20((2)):282–96. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30937-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Abou-Alfa GK, Meyer T, Cheng AL, El-Khoueiry AB, Rimassa L, Ryoo BY, et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced and progressing hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 5;379((1)):54–63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1717002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, Crocenzi TS, Kudo M, Hsu C, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389((10088)):2492–502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31046-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J, Cattan S, Ogasawara S, Palmer D, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19((7)):940–52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30351-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Finn RS, Ryoo BY, Merle P, Kudo M, Bouattour M, Lim HY, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in keynote-240: a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 20;38((3)):193–202. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yau T, Park JW, Finn RS, Cheng A-L, Mathurin P, Edeline J, et al. CheckMate 459: a randomized, multi-center phase 3 study of nivolumab (NIVO) vs sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct;30((Suppl 5)):v874–v875. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Spranger S, Bao R, Gajewski TF. Melanoma-intrinsic β-catenin signalling prevents anti-tumour immunity. Nature. 2015 Jul 9;523((7559)):231–5. doi: 10.1038/nature14404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ruiz de Galarreta M, Bresnahan E, Molina-Sánchez P, Lindblad KE, Maier B, Sia D, et al. β-catenin activation promotes immune escape and resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2019 Aug;9((8)):1124–41. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Harding JJ, Nandakumar S, Armenia J, Khalil DN, Albano M, Ly M, et al. Prospective genotyping of hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical implications of next-generation sequencing for matching patients to targeted and immune therapies. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;25((7)):2116–26. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Llovet JM, Villanueva A, Lachenmayer A, Finn RS. Advances in targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma in the genomic era. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul;12((7)):408–24. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Weide B, Martens A, Hassel JC, Berking C, Postow MA, Bisschop K, et al. Baseline biomarkers for outcome of melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22((22)):5487–96. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tanizaki J, Haratani K, Hayashi H, Chiba Y, Nakamura Y, Yonesaka K, et al. Peripheral blood biomarkers associated with clinical outcome in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab. J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Jan;13((1)):97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kiriu T, Yamamoto M, Nagano T, Koyama K, Katsurada M, Tamura D, et al. Prognostic value of red blood cell distribution width in non-small cell lung cancer treated with anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody. In Vivo. 2019 Jan–Feb;33((1)):213–20. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Russo A, Russano M, Franchina T, Migliorino MR, Aprile G, Mansueto G, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and outcomes with nivolumab in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a large retrospective multicenter study. Adv Ther. 2020 Mar;37((3)):1145–55. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01229-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sangro B, Melero I, Wadhawan S, Finn RS, Abou-Alfa GK, Cheng AL, et al. Association of inflammatory biomarkers with clinical outcomes in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2020 Dec;73((6)):1460–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45((2)):228–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hsu HC, Jeng YM, Mao TL, Chu JS, Lai PL, Peng SY. Beta-catenin mutations are associated with a subset of low-stage hepatocellular carcinoma negative for hepatitis B virus and with favorable prognosis. Am J Pathol. 2000 Sep;157((3)):763–70. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64590-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Laurent-Puig P, Legoix P, Bluteau O, Belghiti J, Franco D, Binot F, et al. Genetic alterations associated with hepatocellular carcinomas define distinct pathways of hepatocarcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2001 Jun;120((7)):1763–73. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.24798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chiang DY, Villanueva A, Hoshida Y, Peix J, Newell P, Minguez B, et al. Focal gains of VEGFA and molecular classification of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;68((16)):6779–88. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zucman-Rossi J, Benhamouche S, Godard C, Boyault S, Grimber G, Balabaud C, et al. Differential effects of inactivated Axin1 and activated beta-catenin mutations in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncogene. 2007 Feb 1;26((5)):774–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Durnez A, Verslype C, Nevens F, Fevery J, Aerts R, Pirenne J, et al. The clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of cytokeratin 7 and 19 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. A possible progenitor cell origin. Histopathology. 2006 Aug;49((2)):138–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02468.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tsujikawa H, Masugi Y, Yamazaki K, Itano O, Kitagawa Y, Sakamoto M. Immunohistochemical molecular analysis indicates hepatocellular carcinoma subgroups that reflect tumor aggressiveness. Hum Pathol. 2016 Apr;50:24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Audard V, Grimber G, Elie C, Radenen B, Audebourg A, Letourneur F, et al. Cholestasis is a marker for hepatocellular carcinomas displaying beta-catenin mutations. J Pathol. 2007 Jul;212((3)):345–52. doi: 10.1002/path.2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ueno A, Masugi Y, Yamazaki K, Komuta M, Effendi K, Tanami Y, et al. OATP1B3 expression is strongly associated with Wnt/β-catenin signalling and represents the transporter of gadoxetic acid in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2014 Nov;61((5)):1080–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sideras K, Biermann K, Verheij J, Takkenberg BR, Mancham S, Hansen BE, et al. PD-L1, galectin-9 and CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6((2)):e1273309. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1273309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nishida N, Sakai K, Morita M, Aoki T, Takita M, Hagiwara S, et al. Association between genetic and immunological background of hepatocellular carcinoma and expression of programmed cell death-1. Liver Cancer. 2020 Aug;9((4)):426–39. doi: 10.1159/000506352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brunner SM, Rubner C, Kesselring R, Martin M, Griesshammer E, Ruemmele P, et al. Tumor-infiltrating, interleukin-33-producing effector-memory CD8(+) T cells in resected hepatocellular carcinoma prolong patient survival. Hepatology. 2015 Jun;61((6)):1957–67. doi: 10.1002/hep.27728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Karasaki T, Nagayama K, Kuwano H, Nitadori JI, Sato M, Anraku M, et al. An immunogram for the cancer-immunity cycle: towards personalized immunotherapy of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 May;12((5)):791–803. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kobayashi Y, Kushihara Y, Saito N, Yamaguchi S, Kakimi K. A novel scoring method based on RNA-Seq immunograms describing individual cancer-immunity interactions. Cancer Sci. 2020 Aug 18;111((11)):4031–40. doi: 10.1111/cas.14621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sato Y, Wada I, Odaira K, Hosoi A, Kobayashi Y, Nagaoka K, et al. Integrative immunogenomic analysis of gastric cancer dictates novel immunological classification and the functional status of tumor-infiltrating cells. Clin Transl Immunology. 2020;9((10)):e1194. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.de La Coste A, Romagnolo B, Billuart P, Renard CA, Buendia MA, Soubrane O, et al. Somatic mutations of the beta-catenin gene are frequent in mouse and human hepatocellular carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998 Jul 21;95((15)):8847–51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Miyoshi Y, Iwao K, Nagasawa Y, Aihara T, Sasaki Y, Imaoka S, et al. Activation of the beta-catenin gene in primary hepatocellular carcinomas by somatic alterations involving exon 3. Cancer Res. 1998 Jun 15;58((12)):2524–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nishida N, Kudo M. Immune checkpoint blockade for the treatment of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2018 Jul;48((8)):622–34. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu YX. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat Immunol. 2013 Oct;14((10)):1014–22. doi: 10.1038/ni.2703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Teng MW, Ngiow SF, Ribas A, Smyth MJ. Classifying cancers based on t-cell infiltration and PD-L1. Cancer Res. 2015 Jun 1;75((11)):2139–45. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Boyault S, Rickman DS, de Reyniès A, Balabaud C, Rebouissou S, Jeannot E, et al. Transcriptome classification of HCC is related to gene alterations and to new therapeutic targets. Hepatology. 2007 Jan;45((1)):42–52. doi: 10.1002/hep.21467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hoshida Y, Nijman SM, Kobayashi M, Chan JA, Brunet JP, Chiang DY, et al. Integrative transcriptome analysis reveals common molecular subclasses of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009 Sep 15;69((18)):7385–92. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tan PS, Nakagawa S, Goossens N, Venkatesh A, Huang T, Ward SC, et al. Clinicopathological indices to predict hepatocellular carcinoma molecular classification. Liver Int. 2016 Jan;36((1)):108–18. doi: 10.1111/liv.12889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kurebayashi Y, Ojima H, Tsujikawa H, Kubota N, Maehara J, Abe Y, et al. Landscape of immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma and its additional impact on histological and molecular classification. Hepatology. 2018 Sep;68((3)):1025–41. doi: 10.1002/hep.29904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nishida N, Kudo M. Immune phenotype and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12((5)):1274. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382((20)):1894–905. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sia D, Jiao Y, Martinez-Quetglas I, Kuchuk O, Villacorta-Martin C, Castro de Moura M, et al. Identification of an immune-specific class of hepatocellular carcinoma, based on molecular features. Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep;153((3)):812–26. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kim HD, Song GW, Park S, Jung MK, Kim MH, Kang HJ, et al. Association between expression level of PD1 by tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells and features of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec;155((6)):1936–50.e17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mimura K, Teh JL, Okayama H, Shiraishi K, Kua LF, Koh V, et al. PD-L1 expression is mainly regulated by interferon gamma associated with JAK-STAT pathway in gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 2018 Jan;109((1)):43–53. doi: 10.1111/cas.13424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kobayashi Y, Lim SO, Yamaguchi H. Oncogenic signaling pathways associated with immune evasion and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020 Oct;65:51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fujita M, Yamaguchi R, Hasegawa T, Shimada S, Arihiro K, Hayashi S, et al. Classification of primary liver cancer with immunosuppression mechanisms and correlation with genomic alterations. EBioMedicine. 2020 Mar;53:102659. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Guo X, Zhao Y, Yan H, Yang Y, Shen S, Dai X, et al. Single tumor-initiating cells evade immune clearance by recruiting type II macrophages. Genes Dev. 2017 Feb 1;31((3)):247–59. doi: 10.1101/gad.294348.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pfister D, Núñez NG, Pinyol R, Govaere O, Pinter M, Szydlowska M, et al. NASH limits anti-tumour surveillance in immunotherapy-treated HCC. Nature. 2021;592((7854)):450–6. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03362-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data





