Dear Editor
Despite being the commonest musculoskeletal disorder, knee Osteoarthritis (OA) has no consensual treatment guideline for its management. The variety of treatment guidelines creates confusion in the management of patients. Therefore, a consensus treatment guideline is necessary to manage these patients with evidence-based treatment modalities.
We have analyzed six existing guidelines on the non-operative management of knee OA [Table 1]. They included recommendations from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Disease, Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI), The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP), and the Cochrane review (1-5).
Table 1.
Findings of various studies and their recommendations
| AAOS (2013) | ESCEO (2019) | NICE (2019) | RACGP (2018) | OARSI (2019) | Cochrane (2019) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Pharmacological management | ||||||
| 1. Self-management program | Strong | Strong recommendation | Recommended | No recommendation | Conditional recommendation |
No or small benefit |
| 2. Land-based exercise | Strong | Strong recommendation | Recommended | Recommended | Strong recommendation | Recommended |
| 3. Weight management | Moderate | Strong recommendation | Recommended | Recommended | Strong recommendation | N/A |
| 4. Use of physical agents | Inconclusive | Recommended | Recommended | Conditionally recommended (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) | N/A | Unclear |
| 5. Manual Therapy | Inconclusive | Recommended | Recommended | Recommended | N/A | N/A |
| 6.Off Loading knee braces (for medial osteoarthritis) | Inconclusive | Recommended | Recommended | Not recommended | N/A | Unclear |
| 7. Lateral wedge insoles | Not recommended |
Recommended | Recommended | Not recommended | N/A | Unclear |
| 8. Acupuncture | Not recommended |
N/A | Not recommended |
Not recommended | N/A | Benefits are small |
| Pharmacological Management | ||||||
| 1.Glucosamine and chondroitin | Not recommended |
Strong recommendation | Not recommended |
Not recommended | N/A | Inconclusive (chondroitin) No benefit (glucosamine) |
| 2.Oral Opioid | Strong | Weak recommendation | Recommended | Not recommended | N/A | No significant benefit |
| 3.Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs | Strong | Strong recommendation | Recommended | Not recommended | Strongly recommended | N/A |
| 4.Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs | Strong | Strong recommendation | Recommended | Recommended | Conditional recommendation |
N/A |
| 5.Paracetamol | Inconclusive | Not recommended | Recommended | Recommended | N/A | Minimal improvements |
| 6.Opioid/pain patches | Inconclusive | Weak recommendation (end-stage arthritis) | N/A | Not recommended | N/A | N/A |
| 7.Duloxetine | N/A | Weak recommendation | N/A | Recommended | Conditional recommendation |
N/A |
| Intra-articular injections | ||||||
| 1.Corticosteroids | Inconclusive | Weak recommendation | Recommended | Recommended | Conditional recommendation |
Unclear |
| 2.Hyaluronic acid | Not recommended |
Weak recommendation | Not recommended |
Not recommended | Conditional recommendation |
Support the use |
| 3.Platelet-rich plasma and Stem cell therapy | Inconclusive | N/A | Special arrangement |
No recommendation (platelet-rich plasma) Not recommended (stem cells) |
N/A | N/A |
AAOS: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, NICE: National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, ESCEO: European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Disease, OARSI: Osteoarthritis Research Society International, RACGP: The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners
A consensus was found on the efficacy of self-management programs, land-based exercise, and weight loss. These guidelines do not recommend the use of acupuncture in OA and there was a mixed opinion for the use of physiotherapy modalities and orthotics. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are recommended for pain relief, but along with their topical forms, their long-term use is not advisable. The effects of paracetamol on the early stages of the disease and opioids on the later stages of the disease are debatable. Furthermore, it should be noted that the use of glucosamine and chondroitin has been discouraged by most of these guidelines. Use of intra-articular steroids for acute pain and inflammation is recommended by the majority of guidelines, but not for Stem cells and Platelet Rich Plasma therapy. Moreover, the use of Hyaluronic Acid is still debatable [Figure 1].
Figure 1.
Recommendations for an intra-articular intervention for knee osteoarthritis
We noticed several discrepancies in these recommendations which can be explained by the fact that these varied groups represent different geographical areas, patient cohorts, as well as various existing and prevalent practice methods in their specialties and their particular geographical area. For example, the studied recommendations were from both surgical association (e.g. AAOS) and physician associations (e.g. RACGP, OARSI). The bias of the treating physician towards a particular treatment modality is based on their training. We believe that the acceptability of the patient is based on cost factors, ease of access to a particular treatment modality, social conditioning towards pain perception, and whether the treatment modality is covered by insurance or their healthcare provider or it is from out of pocket expenses. There could also be an organizational bias due to their commitment to a particular section of care providers like the government, general practitioners, surgeons, rheumatologists, or physical therapists.
We are aware that the standardization of recommendations is a difficult and challenging task due to various factors, like heterogeneity of patient population, method of study, evaluation of the results, different stages of disease presentation, various lifestyles and activity demands, access to healthcare, co-morbidities, and demographic diversities. Although these recommendations are useful at large for the guidance of healthcare providers, they cannot be entirely applied to the clinical practice of every physician and surgeon. Much more work and white papers are required which are derived from the studies of large population groups from various parts of the world with the consideration of various individuals and demographic factors.
References
- 1.Brown GA. AAOS clinical practice guideline: treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2013;21(9):577–9. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-09-577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bruyère O, Honvo G, Veronese N, Arden NK, Branco J, Curtis EM, et al. An updated algorithm recommendation for the management of knee osteoarthritis from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 2019;49(3):377–350. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for the management of knee and hip osteoarthritis. 2018. https://www.racgp.org.au/download/Documents/Guidelines/Musculoskeletal/guideline-for-the-management-of-knee-and-hip-oa-2nd-edition.
- 4.Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, Arden NK, Bennell K, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and cartilage. 2019;27(11):1578–89. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kroon FP, van der Burg LR, Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Johnston RV, Pitt V. Self-management education programmes for osteoarthritis. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014;(1) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008963.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

