Skip to main content
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation logoLink to Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
. 2021 Aug 18;12:21514593211036230. doi: 10.1177/21514593211036230

Perilunate Dislocation Above the Age of 65 Years: Case Series and Review of Literature

Guy Rubin 1,2,, Amir Eliyahu 1, Erez Grinbaum 1, Nimrod Rozen 1,2
PMCID: PMC8377302  PMID: 34422437

Abstract

Introduction

Perilunate and fracture dislocations predominantly follow a high-energy mechanism. Perilunate dislocations have an incidence of 0.5/105 individuals/year, occurring at a mean age of 26 years and are frequently seen in men. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of this injury in elderly population of patients using literature review and our experience with four cases aged >65 years.

Materials and Methods

We treated four patients with perilunate dislocation aged >65 years. All the patients’ medical records were reviewed retrospectively. A literature review for case studies of perilunate dislocation was conducted with the purpose of finding cases including patients aged >65 years.

Results

Three of our patients had injuries that were missed in the first visit in the emergency department. The mechanism of injury was high energy in only two patients. Two patients had posterior perilunate dislocation, while the other two had transradial perilunate dislocation. Three patients were available for follow-up. The overall outcome was satisfaction according the Mayo wrist score and minimal disability according to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. All patients reported that pain was absent and they were able to return to their regular activities. The literature review found only seven papers documenting treatment of patients aged >65 years.

Discussion

Perilunate dislocation is extremely rare in the population aged >65 years. Although the rate of missed diagnosis in our cohort was extremely high, the overall satisfaction and return to function was high.

Conclusions

This case series and literature review highlight the unique characteristics of this injury in the age group of patients aged >65 years. Although perilunate dislocation in patients aged >65 years is rare, clinicians should be aware of the presentation of this condition in the elderly.

Keywords: age, dislocation, fracture, perilunate, wrist

Background

Perilunate fracture dislocations predominantly follow a high-energy mechanism of hyperextension, ulnar deviation, and intercarpal supination injury to the wrist. Perilunate fracture dislocation is the most common form of wrist dislocation and encompasses a spectrum of injuries, which can include both ligamentous and osseous disruption.1

Data documenting the global epidemiology of these injuries are limited. One study has demonstrated that of all patients with a carpal fracture, only 7% sustained multiple carpal fractures, with almost half of these being perilunate fracture dislocations and over 90% involving a fracture to the scaphoid.2 Work from Edinburgh on dislocations has demonstrated that perilunate dislocations have an incidence of 0.5/105 individuals/year, occurring at a mean age of 26 years, and are frequently seen in men.3 The injury is frequently seen in young men with strong bones because the distal radius and the scaphoid need to be strong enough to resist the amount of torque that results in a perilunate dislocation.4

The six types of wrist dislocations are dorsal perilunate, lesser arc; dorsal perilunate fracture dislocations, greater arc; palmar perilunate, lesser or greater arc; radiocarpal; axial; and isolated carpal bone.5 Time from injury to treatment (delay in treatment), anatomic classification, and open or closed nature of the injury are the major factors that determine the clinical outcome in perilunate dislocations.6 Herzberg et al.4 have classified perilunate dislocations into three phases. The acute phase is defined as the first week after injury, the delayed phase is the period between the 7th and 45th days of injury, and those thereafter are classified as the chronic phase. Despite optimal management, the prognosis of this injury is relatively poor, and most patients experience a loss of grip strength and motion and also develop radiographic signs of arthritis and carpal collapse. The major poor prognostic indicators are a delay in treatment greater than 28 to 45 days, open injuries, and persistent carpal malalignment.7

Although this type of injury is severe, incorrect or missed diagnosis may cause a delay in the treatment in up to 25% of the cases.4 If the acute phase is missed, some authors recommend alternative procedures, such as proximal row carpectomy, intercarpal arthrodesis, or radiocarpal arthrodesis, for delayed or chronic phase transscaphoid perilunate dislocation.8

This study aimed to describe the characteristics of this injury in the elderly population using literature review and our experience with four cases.

Methods

We treated four patients with perilunate dislocation (two men and two women) aged >65 years (average age, 75 years; 68, 71, 80, and 81 years). All the patients’ medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Data were collected from medical files and radiographs, and the patients were examined in our outpatient clinic. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score9 and Mayo wrist score10,11; wrist range of motion was assessed using a goniometer and grip power using a JAMAR® dynamometer at the most recent examination.

Literature review was initiated, and the MEDLINE database and the Cochrane Library were searched for English language papers. The terms “perilunate dislocation,” “wrist injuries,” and “carpal fracture” were used.

Results

We treated four patients. Only one patient with an open injury was operated on the day of injury, while three other patients had injuries that were missed in the first visit in the emergency department (Table 1). The mechanism of injury was high energy in only two patients. Two patients had posterior perilunate dislocation, while the other two had transradial perilunate dislocation.

Table 1.

Demographic and Injury Characteristics.

Patient Male/female Age at time of injury Injured side Dominant side Mechanism of injury Other injuries Time to surgery Open/close injury Dislocation Fixation
1 F 81 Rt Rt Fall from standing Non 10 days Closed Transradial styloid perilunate dislocation L-SC, SC-CA, TR-L, RADIAL STYLOID
2 M 71 Lt Rt Fall from standing Non 9 days Closed Dorsal perilunate dislocation L-SC, SC-CA + SLIL Recon
3 F 80 Rt Rt Fall from electric mobile vehicle Non 0 day Open Transradial styloid dorsal perilunate dislocation SC-L, RADIAL STYLOID
4 M 68 Rt Rt Fall from a ladder Ipsilateral shoulder dislocation 1.5 months Closed Dorsal perilunate dislocation PARTIAL FUSION SC + L + CA

L-SC, lunate-scaphoid; SC-CA, scaphoid-capitate; TR-L, triquetrum-lunate; SLIL, scapholunate interosseous ligament.

All patients were managed using a dorsal approach; fractures and the carpal bones were reduced and fixed with Kirschner wires (KWs); one patient had scapholunate ligament repair and one patient had a partial fusion between the lunate–scaphoid–capitate 1.5 months after the injury.

Three of the four patients were available for follow-up (Table 2). The overall outcome was satisfaction according to the Mayo wrist score (65, 60, 65) and minimal disability according to the DASH score (2.5, 3.3, 5.8). All patients reported no pain and returned to their regular activities. The only patient lost to follow-up had an open injury with severe transradial dislocation that was fixed with only two KW, and an X-ray 6 weeks post-operation demonstrated a failure of fixation.

Table 2.

Outcome Measures.

Patient Follow-up DF PF Pronation/supination Strength (kg) DASH Score Mayo wrist score
1 5 years Rt 40, Lt 60 RT 40, LT 60 Full Rt-16
Lt-10
2.5 65
2 6 months Rt 40, Lt 60 RT 40, LT 50 Full Rt-35
Lt-15
3.3 60
3 1 month NA NA NA NA NA NA
4 9 months Rt 35, Lt 70 RT 60, LT 60 Full Rt-22
Lt-35
5.8 65

DF, dorsiflexion; PF, palmar flexion; NA, not applicable.

During literature review, we found only seven studies documenting the treatment of patients aged >65 years (Table 3).10,12-17 Only two studies provided details about the patients. Campbell et al.12 treated two patients aged 67 and 69 years, the latter with transradial styloid posterior perilunate dislocation. Sotereanos et al.17 treated a patient aged 72 years with transscaphoid, transradial styloid, transtriquetral perilunate dislocation.

Table 3.

Case Series of Perilunate Dislocation with Patients Above 65 Years Old in the English Literature.

Article No. of patients Age range No. of patients above 65 years (age) Type of injury Result
Campbell (1964) 50 16–68 2 (67, 69) 1-transradial styloid posterior perilunate dislocation Poor
Panting (1984) 61 10–70 NA NA
Garcia-Elias (1986) 87 17–74 NA NA
Cooney (1987) 38 15–71 NA NA
Inoue and Imaeda (1997) 28 17–67 NA NA
Sotereanos (1997) 11 22–72 1 (72) Transscaphoid, transradial styloid, transtriquetral NA
Israel (2016) 65 17–73 NA NA

Discussion

Perilunate dislocation is a rare incidence in all comers.3 Our literature review demonstrated that this injury is extremely rare in the population aged >65 years. We treated two women and two men aged >65 years, of which only two resulted from a high-energy mechanism.

Time from injury to treatment is important for the clinical outcome,6 and an incorrect or missed diagnosis may cause a delay in the treatment of up to 25% of the cases.4 We treated three patients with a missed diagnosis. The only patient that was diagnosed immediately suffered from an open injury that could not be missed. The high incidence of missed diagnosis is attributed to the rare incidence of this injury in this age group.

Given the high-energy nature of these injuries, up to 10% of these injuries are open, 26% are associated with polytrauma, and 11% have concomitant injuries of the upper extremity, such as a distal radioulnar joint dislocation and/or elbow injury.18 We treated two patients with high-energy trauma, one of them with concomitant ipsilateral shoulder dislocation. The literature review could not find details on the mechanism of energy nor on the concomitant injuries of elderly patients.

The types of wrist dislocation5 in our patients were posterior lesser arc in two patients and posterior transradial perilunate dislocation in the two others. We were surprised to find a 72-year-old patient with transscaphoid, transradial styloid, transtriquetral perilunate dislocation17 in the literature review because scaphoid fractures in this age group are extremely rare and were estimated to be less than 0.5 per 100 000 person-year.19

The treatment of choice for acute injury is open reduction, ligament repair, and internal fixation.20,21 We treated three patients admitted within 10 days from the injury using this method. One patient missed for 6 weeks had a salvage procedure. In the literature review, we could not find any specific description of the treatment.

The prognosis of this injury is relatively poor; most patients experience a loss of grip strength and motion and develop radiographic signs of arthritis and carpal collapse. However, these clinical measurements and radiographic changes do not correlate with patient satisfaction or the ability to return to work.21 Three of our patients who were available for follow-up might have presented with good satisfaction because of the low demand with this age group.

This work has the disadvantages of a small number of cases and limited availability of information in literature for this type of injury in this age group probably because of its rarity.

This case series and literature review highlight the unique characteristics of this injury in the age group of patients aged >65 years. The injury pattern is similar, the treatment is the same, but the results are very good compared to younger patients. Although perilunate dislocation in patients aged >65 years is rare, clinicians should be aware of the presentation of this condition in all aged groups, including the elderly and the need for examination and accurate imaging, especially that this condition is uncommon, and the incidence of incorrect or missed diagnosis is high.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the local ethical committee.

ORCID iD

Guy Rubin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1032-7280

References

  • 1.Mayfield JK. Patterns of injury to carpal ligaments. A spectrum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;(187):36-42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hey HW, Chong AK, Murphy D, Sze AC, Murphy D.Prevalence of carpal fracture in Singapore. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(2):278-283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Duckworth AD, Jenkins PJ, Aitken SA, Clement ND, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Scaphoid fracture epidemiology. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(2):E41-E45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Herzberg G, Comtet JJ, Linscheid RL, Amadio PC, Cooney WP, Stalder J. Perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations: A multicenter study. J Hand Surg Am. 1993;18(5):768-779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scalcione LR, Gimber LH, Ho AM, Johnston SS, Sheppard JE, Taljanovic MS. Spectrum of carpal dislocations and fracture-dislocations: Imaging and management. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2014;203(3):541-550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gellman H, Schwartz SD, Botte MJ, Feiwell L. Late treatment of a dorsal transscaphoid, transtriquetral perilunate wrist dislocation with avascular changes of the lunate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;(237):196-203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Budoff JE. Treatment of acute lunate and perilunate dislocations. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008;33(8):1424-1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Morawa LG, Ross PM, Schock CC. Fractures and dislocations involving the navicular-lunate axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;(118):48-53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D, Davis A, et al. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand [corrected]. The upper extremity collaborative group. American journal of industrial medicine. 1996;29(6):602-608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cooney WP, Bussey R, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Difficult wrist fractures. Perilunate fracture-dislocations of the wrist. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;(214):136-147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Amadio PC, Berquist TH, Smith DK, Ilstrup DM, Cooney WP, 3rd, Linscheid RL. Scaphoid malunion. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14(4):679-687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Campbell RD, Jr., Lance EM, Yeoh CB. Lunate and perilunar dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964;46:55-72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Garcia-Elias M, Irisarri C, Henriquez A, Abanco J, Fores J, Lluch A, et al. Perilunar dislocation of the carpus. A diagnosis still often missed. Ann Chir Main. 1986;5(4):281-287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Inoue G, Imaeda T. Management of trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocations. Herbert screw fixation, ligamentous repair and early wrist mobilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116(6-7):338-340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Israel D, Delclaux S, André A, Apredoaei C, Rongières M, Bonnevialle P, et al. Peri-lunate dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the wrist: Retrospective evaluation of 65 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(3):351-355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Panting A, Lamb D, Noble J, Haw C. Dislocations of the lunate with and without fracture of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66-B(3):391-395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sotereanos DG, Mitsionis GJ, Giannakopoulos PN, Tomaino MM, Herndon JH. Perilunate dislocation and fracture dislocation: a critical analysis of the volar-dorsal approach. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22(1):49-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Herzberg G. Acute dorsal trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocations: Open reduction and internal fixation. Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery. 2000;4(1):2-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Van Tassel DC, Owens BD, Wolf JM. Incidence estimates and demographics of scaphoid fracture in the US population. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(8):1242-1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Blazar PE, Murray P. Treatment of perilunate dislocations by combined dorsal and palmar approaches. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2001;5(1):2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Grabow RJ, Catalano L, 3rd. Carpal dislocations. Hand clinics. 2006;22(4):485-500; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES