Skip to main content
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine logoLink to Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
. 2021 Sep 23;22(6):1351. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10786

Computational healthcare: Present and future perspectives (Review)

Ayumu Asai 1,2,3, Masamitsu Konno 1, Masateru Taniguchi 3, Andrea Vecchione 4, Hideshi Ishii 1,
PMCID: PMC8515560  PMID: 34659497

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been developed through repeated new discoveries since around 1960. The use of AI is now becoming widespread within society and our daily lives. AI is also being introduced into healthcare, such as medicine and drug development; however, it is currently biased towards specific domains. The present review traces the history of the development of various AI-based applications in healthcare and compares AI-based healthcare with conventional healthcare to show the future prospects for this type of care. Knowledge of the past and present development of AI-based applications would be useful for the future utilization of novel AI approaches in healthcare.

Keywords: computational medicine, artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence-based application, diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, drug development

1. Introduction

‘Big data’, large datasets that are difficult to record, store and analyze with conventional data management systems, has been accumulating in various fields in recent years with regard to the development of communication and sensor technology. The advances in technology regarding big data have emerged that the use of big data is expected to create new avenues of research. However, the overall trend of big data is difficult to understand based on general information processing by humans; thus, information processing by artificial intelligence (AI) has also attracted attention (1). In general, industries have succeeded in improving sales and work efficiency and decreasing costs using big data and AI (2).

In healthcare, the creation of new knowledge and the improvement in diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes are expected through the utilization of big data pertaining to life science information and medical data (3). In fact, the implementation of AI in healthcare has been actively investigated; however, it has not been used in a widespread manner due to a number of problems (4).

The present review looks back at the history of AI and AI-based applications, compares the advantages and the issues of conventional healthcare and AI-based healthcare, and considers the future development of AI-based applications.

2. Historical view of the clinical application of computational support

In the 1950s, McCarthy et al (5) proposed AI as a prediction machine (hardware or software that exhibits behavior which appears intelligence by predicting associations between variables). Samuel (6) developed machine learning in 1959, which triggered the first AI boom (Fig. 1). In this period, the discrimination of cells in microscopic images started to be investigated using machine learning (7,8). In the 1970s, progress with AI was temporarily halted, as the AI was only able to solve simple problems. By contrast, in the same period, expert systems consisting of knowledge bases and inference engines were invented, and tools for diagnosis in specific fields such as MYCIN and INTERNIST-1 were developed (9,10). Subsequently, deep learning was proposed by Dechter (11) in 1986 and a convolutional neural network was proposed by LeCun et al (12) in 1988, leading to the second AI boom. In this boom, to allow adaptation to real-world problems, experts in various fields educated AI using parameters, including marketing, healthcare and life science data. In addition, surgical robots began to flourish during this period. Among them, PUMA 200 was developed to automatically identify the appropriate location of lesions in computed tomography-guided brain tumor biopsies and was the first robot used for assisting human neurosurgery (13). AESOP was a breakthrough in robotic surgery when introduced in 1994, as it was the first laparoscopic camera holder to be approved by the FDA (14). Moreover, in 2000, the da Vinci Surgical System obtained FDA approval for use in general laparoscopic procedures and became the first operative surgical robot in the US (15). In 2005, a surgical technique for the da Vinci Surgical System was documented in canine and cadaveric models called transoral robotic surgery; this was the only FDA-approved robot to perform head and neck surgery at the time (16).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Historical view of clinical applications with computational support. (B) Trigger, trends and problems of each AI boom. AI, artificial intelligence; ILSVRC, ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge.

In addition, medications based on a computational analysis of the crystal structure of molecules were developed (17,18). The ROBODOC Surgical System was introduced and revolutionized orthopedic surgery by being able to assist with hip replacement surgeries. This was the first surgical robot to be approved for use in humans by the FDA in 2008(19).

Thus, during the second AI boom, several tools were successfully developed. However, it was difficult for humans to provide the information that an AI needs to solve complex problems, and it was difficult for the machines of that time to learn the vast level of information available.

With the advent of deep learning in 2006 and the development of computers and communication equipment, the interest in AI was renewed (20,21). In particular, the historical victory of a deep learning program by utilizing a convolutional neural network, a deep learning method in image recognition, in an image recognition contest called the ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) triggered the third AI boom (22). As a result, image recognition has become the most applied AI-based technology in the clinical setting. When considering clinical applications based on image recognition using AI, IB Neuro is a diagnostic software used to detect brain tumors by MRI, and this was approved by the FDA in 2008 as the first AI-based application in humans (23). In addition, IntelliSite was approved by the FDA as the first whole-slide imaging system in 2017 (24,25). Thus, a number of AI-based applications were approved by the FDA in the third AI boom. The number of approved applications for diagnostics, mainly image recognition, increased from 11 in 2008-2015 to 135 in 2016-2020 (Table I) (23,26). In addition to applications for diagnosis, applications for treatment are also being approved by the FDA, with three AI-based applications to support treatment processes such as radiotherapy being approved in 2018-2019 (23,26).

Table I.

FDA approved AI-based applications.

Applications Company Purpose Medical specialty FDA Cleared
IB Neuro Imaging Biometrics, LLC Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2008
Pathwork Tissue of Origin Test Kit-FFPE Pathwork Diagnostics, Inc. Diagnosis Pathology 2010
DeltaView Model 2.1 Riverain Technologies Diagnosis Radiology 2011
AlphaPoint Imaging Software RadLogics, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2012
BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System Preventice Follow-up Cardiology 2012
ClearRead +Confirm Riverain Technologies Diagnosis Radiology 2012
Temporal Comparison Riverain Technologies Diagnosis Radiology 2012
cvi42 Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2014
Ahead 100 BrainScope Diagnosis Neurology 2014
AliveCor AliveCor Diagnosis Cardiology 2014
Lung Density Analysis Imbio LLC Diagnosis Radiology 2014
Vitrea CT Lung Density Analysis Software Vital Images, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2015
Stroke VCAR GE Medical Systems Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2016
QbCheck QbTech AB Diagnosis Psychiatry 2016
PixelShine AlgoMedica Diagnosis Radiology 2016
Steth IO Stratoscientific, Inc. Diagnosis General medicine 2016
ClearRead CT Riverain Technologies Diagnosis Radiology 2016
Arterys Cardio DL Arterys Inc Diagnosis Radiology 2016
CT CoPilot ZepMed, LLC. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2016
ClearView cCAD ClearView Diagnostics Inc. Diagnosis Oncology 2016
Arterys Cardio DL Arterys Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2017
Cantab Mobile Cambridge Cognition, Ltd. Diagnosis Neurology 2017
Lung Nodule Assessment and Comparison Option Philips Medical Systems Diagnosis Radiology 2017
EnsoSleep EnsoData, Inc. Diagnosis Neurology 2017
AmCAD-US AmCad BioMed Corporation Diagnosis Radiology 2017
QuantX Quantitative Insights, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2017
NeuroQuant Cortechs.ai Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2017
LesionQuant Cortechs.ai Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2017
Arterys Oncology DL Arterys Inc Diagnosis Radiology 2017
Rooti Rx System ECG Event Recorder, Rooti Link APP Software Rooti Labs, Ltd. Diagnosis Cardiology 2017
BioFlux Biotricity, Inc. Diagnosis Cardiology 2017
CNeuro cMRI Combinostics Oy Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2018
Idx IDx LLC Diagnosis Ophthalmology 2018
WAVE Clinical Platform Excel Medical Electronics, LLC Follow-up Hospital monitoring 2018
Insight BD Siemens Healthineers Diagnosis Radiology 2018
Viz LVO (ContaCT) Viz. AI, Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2018
DM-Density Densitas, Inc. Diagnosis Oncology 2018
OsteoDetect Imagen Technologies, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2018
Quantib Brain Quantib BV Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2018
Guardian Connect System Medtronic Diagnosis Endocrinology 2018
PowerLook Density Assessment Software ICAD Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2018
Viz CTP Viz. ai, inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2018
NeuralBot Neural Analytics, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2018
OsteoDetect Imagen Technologies Diagnosis Radiology 2018
EchoMD Automated Ejection Fraction Software Bay Labs, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2018
MindMotion GO MindMaze SA Follow-up Orthopedics 2018
LungQ Thirona Corporation Diagnosis Radiology 2018
HealthCCS Zebra Medical Vision Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2018
EchoMD Automated Ejection Fraction Software Bay Labs, Inc. Diagnosis Cardiology 2018
DenSeeMammo Statlife Diagnosis Oncology 2018
DreaMed DreaMed Diabetes, Ltd Follow-up Endocrinology 2018
ProFound™ AI Software V2.1 iCAD, Inc Diagnosis Radiology 2018
BriefCase- ICH Aidoc Medical, Ltd. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2018
AmCAD-UT Detection 2.2 AmCAD BioMed Corporation Diagnosis Endocrinology 2018
Arterys MICA Arterys, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2018
ECG App Apple, Inc. Follow-up Cardiology 2018
Volpara Imaging Software Volpara Health Technologies Limited Diagnosis Oncology 2018
AI-ECG Platform Shenzhen Carewell Electronics, Ltd. Diagnosis Cardiology 2018
FibriCheck Qompium NV Follow-up Cardiology 2018
Irregular Rhythm Notification Feature Apple, Inc. Diagnosis Cardiology 2018
RightEye Vision System RightEye, LLC Diagnosis Ophthalmology 2018
Accipiolx MaxQ-Al, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2018
icobrain Icometrix NV Diagnosis Radiology 2018
FluoroShield™ Omega Medical Imaging, LLC Treatment Radiology 2018
Vitrea CT Brain Perfusion Vital Images, Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2018
SubtlePET Subtle Medical, Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2018
FerriSmart Analysis System Resonance Health Analysis Service Pty, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2018
Embrace Empatica Srl Follow-up Neurology 2018
Quantib ND Quantib BV Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2018
iSchemaView RAPID iSchemaView, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2018
Study Watch Verily Life Sciences LLC Follow-up Cardiology 2019
cmTriage CureMetrix, Inc. Diagnosis Oncology 2019
Thoracic VCAR with GSI Pulmonary Perfusion GE Medical Systems Diagnosis Radiology 2019
KardiaAI AliveCor, Inc Follow-up Cardiology 2019
Loop System Spry Health, Inc. Follow-up Hospital monitoring 2019
RhythmAnalytics Biofourmis Singapore Pte, Ltd. Follow-up Cardiology 2019
Bone Vcar GE Medical Systems Diagnosis Radiology 2019
Aidoc Briefcase- ICH and PE triage Aidoc Medical, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2019
Deep Learning Image Reconstruction GE Medical Systems, LLC. Diagnosis Radiology 2019
eMurmer ID CSD Labs GmbH Diagnosis Cardiology 2019
HealthPNX Zebra Medical Vision Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2019
Aidoc BriefCase- CSF triage Aidoc Medical, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2019
ReSET-O Pear Therapeutics, Inc. Treatment Psychiatry 2019
HealthICH Zebra Medical Vision Ltd. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2019
Advanced Intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE) Canon Medical Systems Corporation Diagnosis Radiology 2019
Koios DS Koios Medical, Inc Diagnosis Oncology 2019
DeepCT Deep01 Limited Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2019
iNtuition-Structural Heart Module TeraRecon, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2019
AI-Rad Companion (Pulmonary) Siemens Healthineers Diagnosis Radiology 2019
ACR | LAB Urine Analysis Test System Healthy.io, Ltd. Diagnosis Urology 2019
Current Wearable Health Monitoring System Current Health, Ltd. Follow-up Hospital monitoring 2019
physIQ Heart Rhythm and Respiratory Module physIQ, Inc Diagnosis Cardiology 2019
RayCare 2.3 RaySearch Laboratories AB Treatment Radiology 2019
Critical Care Suite GE Medical Systems Diagnosis Radiology 2019
Biovitals Analytics Engine Biofourmis Singapore Pte. Ltd Follow-up Cardiology 2019
Caption Guidance Caption Health, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2019
AI-Rad Companion (cardiovascular) Siemens Healthineers Diagnosis Radiology 2019
SubtleMR Subtle Medical, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2019
StoneChecker Imaging Biometrics, LLC Diagnosis Radiology 2019
BrainScope TBI BrainScope Company, Inc Diagnosis Neurology 2019
ProFound AI Software V2.1 ICAD Inc. Diagnosis Oncology 2019
KOALA IB Lab GmbH Diagnosis Radiology 2019
EchoGo Core Ultromics, Ltd. Diagnosis Cardiology 2019
RSI-MRI+ HealthLytix Diagnosis Radiology 2019
HealthCXR Zebra Medical Vision, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2019
icobrain Icometrix NV Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2019
QyScore Software Qynapse Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2019
Aidoc BriefCase- LVO Aidoc Medical, Ltd. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2019
AutoMIStar Apollo Medical Imaging Technology Pty, Ltd. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2019
TransparaTM Screenpoint Medical B.V. Diagnosis Radiology 2019
ADAS 3D Galgo Medical S.L Diagnosis Radiology 2020
QuantX Quantitative Insights, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
Eko Analysis Software Eko Devices, Inc. Follow-up Cardiology 2020
densitas densityai Densitas, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
red dot Behold.AI Technologies, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
icobrain-ctp Icometrix NV Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
Broncholab Fluidda, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
Transpara ScreenPoint Medical B.V. Diagnosis Oncology 2020
Al-Rad Companion (Musculoskeletal) Siemens Healthineers Diagnosis Radiology 2020
Hepatic VCAR GE Medical Systems Diagnosis Radiology 2020
MammoScreen Therapixel Diagnosis Oncology 2020
RAPID ICH iSchemaView, Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
AIMI-Triage CXR PTX RadLogics, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
CuraRad-ICH Keya Medical Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
NinesAI Nines, Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
HealthVCF Zebra Medical Vision, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
Syngo.CT CaScoring Siemens Healthineers Diagnosis Radiology 2020
MEDO ARIA Medo.AI Diagnosis Orthopedics 2020
Auto 3D Bladder Volume Tool Butterfly Network, Inc. Diagnosis Urology 2020
AI-Rad Companion Brain MR Siemens Healthineers Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
qER Qure.ai Technologies Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
BriefCase-IFG Aidoc Medical, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
CINA AVICENNA.AI Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
Rapid ASPECTS iSchemaView Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
EyeArt Eyenuk, Inc. Diagnosis Ophthalmology 2020
InferRead Lung CT.AI Beijing Infervision Technology Co., Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
Rapid LVO 1.0 iSchemaView, Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
HealthMammo Zebra Medical Vision, Ltd. Diagnosis Oncology 2020
Caption Interpretation Automated Ejection Fraction Software Caption Health Diagnosis Cardiology 2020
AI-Rad Companion Prostate MR Siemens Healthineers Diagnosis Radiology 2020
FractureDetect (FX) Imagen Technologies Diagnosis Radiology 2020
VIDA|vision VIDA Diagnostics, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
Accipiolx MaxQ Al, Ltd. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
Aidoc BriefCase for iPE Triage Aidoc Medical, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
Aview 2.0 Coreline Soft Co., Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
AVA (Augmented Vascular Analysis) See-Mode Technologies Pte, Ltd. Diagnosis Cardiology 2020
THINQ CorticoMetrics LLC Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
Cleerly Labs V2.0 Cleerly, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
Syngo.CT Neuro Perfusion Siemens Healthineers Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
Quantib Prostate Quantib BV Diagnosis Radiology 2020
AVIEW LCS Coreline Soft Co., Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
Liver Surface Nodularity (LSN) Imaging Biometrics, LLC Diagnosis Radiology 2020
WRDensity Whiterabbit.ai Inc. Diagnosis Oncology 2020
Neuro.AI Algorithm TeraRecon, Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
FastStroke, CT Perfusion 4D GE Medical Systems Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
PROView GE Medical Systems Diagnosis Radiology 2020
Genius AI Detection Hologic, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
HALO NiCo-Lab B.V. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2020
HealthJOINT Zebra Medical Vision, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
HepaFat-AI Resonance Health Analysis Service Pty, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
SQuEEZ Software Cardiowise, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2020
EchoGo Pro Ultromics, Ltd. Diagnosis Cardiology 2020
AI Metrics AI Metrics, LLC Diagnosis Radiology 2020
BrainInsight Hyperfine Research, Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2021
HearFlow Analysis HeartFlow, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2021
uAI EasyTriage-Rib Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2021
Visage Breast Density Visage Imaging GmbH Diagnosis Oncology 2021
CLEWICU System CLEW Medical, Ltd. Diagnosis Hematology 2021
qp-Prostate Quibim Diagnosis Radiology 2021
Lvivo Software Application DiA Imaging Analysis, Ltd. Diagnosis Cardiology 2021
Veolity MeVis Medical Solutions AG Diagnosis Radiology 2021
NinesMeasure Nines, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2021
Optellum Virtual Nodule Clinic, Optellum Software, Optellum Platform Optellum, Ltd. Diagnosis Radiology 2021
Imbio RV/LV Software Imbio LLC Diagnosis Radiology 2021
Vbrain Vysioneer, Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2021
Viz ICH Viz. AI, Inc. Diagnosis Neuroradiology 2021
syngo.CT Lung CAD (VD20) Subtle Medical, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2021
Saige-Q DeepHealth Diagnosis Oncology 2021
MEDO-Thyroid Medo.AI Diagnosis Endocrinology 2021
CINA CHEST AVICENNA.AI Diagnosis Radiology 2021
Overjet Dental Assist Overjet, Inc. Diagnosis Radiology 2021

AI, artificial intelligence.

Moreover, AI-based applications for follow-up of treatment progress are also being developed. In 2012, the BodyGuardian Remote Monitoring System was the first AI-based application for follow-up to be approved by the FDA (23). Subsequently, applications for follow-up are being actively developed and 13 applications were approved by the FDA in 2017-2020 (23,26). Similarly, computational support continues to contribute to drug development, such as methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 2 targeting one carbon metabolism (27).

AI is being applied to various processes in the medical field. Current AI and AI-based applications are often specialized for each field; however, applications that are widely available, such as IBM Watson (ibm.com/watson), have been also developed (28-30). These applications have been developed during each of the AI booms, each of which exhibited their own trends and problems. AI in the current boom is more developed than before, but there are also problems such as the lack of knowledge regarding the information that AI recognizes. The resolution of such problems is expected to further develop AI. Big data and AI will continue to support healthcare in numerous ways.

3. Current AI applied in medicine

Diagnosis

Diagnosis requires the ability to process different types of information about patients and detect abnormalities with high accuracy and reproducibility. In conventional diagnosis, physicians process various pieces of patient information using their own knowledge and/or experience, and detect abnormalities in patients using their own senses or through diagnostic equipment. This method sometimes fails to detect abnormalities in patients or results in the wrong decisions being made. In addition, the diagnostic ability is dependent on the experience of the physician. Therefore, AI is expected to have diagnostic performance with reproducibility and accuracy equal to or better than that of skilled physicians, and to compensate for differences in physician experience. Current AI for diagnosis is actively being developed to perform diagnostic imaging with computed tomography and tissue sections. In particular, convolutional neural networks perform well in the ILSVRC every year; therefore, convolutional neural networks are the most used for diagnostic imaging and perform as well as or better than skilled physicians (31). Moreover, systems have been developed to predict radiation or anticancer drug sensitivity using convolutional neural networks (32,33). In addition to diagnostic imaging, AI is also being developed to diagnose diseases such as cancer via machine learning of blood components (34). However, limitations in measurement sensitivity and technical artifacts such as noise are barriers to diagnosis using blood components. The development of improved measurement technology and/or more advanced machine learning models would be required for a diagnosis that applies machine learning of blood components (35).

As aforementioned, the current application of AI for diagnosis mainly improves the accuracy of each test. By contrast, for the identification of a disease from various symptoms in a patient and the results of tests, a wide range of knowledge, not specific knowledge, and advanced information processing is necessary. To meet this demand, AI assistants such as Watson are also being developed that can learn the literature on a subject by enabling the processing of natural language, and can make complex decisions using expert systems (28,36).

Thus, for diagnosis, AI is mainly developed to improve the accuracy of each test and make appropriate decisions using the large quantity of related literature available, and different algorithms suitable for each process are applied.

Treatment

For treatment, surgical robots are mainly being developed. Surgical robots are suitable for detailed work with precise movements that is beyond the reach of human hands. In conventional surgical robot algorithms, classification and detection of objects required during surgery are performed by the developer manually creating features of the region of interest; however, with the advent of deep learning, convolutional neural networks are being applied for the classification and detection of objects (37,38). In addition, real-time predictions are also being made with recurrent neural networks (39). Conventional surgical robots are operated by a physician; however, surgical robots that work automatically without operation by a physician are also being developed (40). Thus, the development of AI has also led to the development of robots that support physicians during surgery.

In addition, in drug therapy, AI-based applications are being introduced in diagnosis and follow-up rather than in the treatment process. Various AI applications have been introduced in the drug development process to develop therapeutic drugs. In the drug development process, developers need to process an enormous amount of information to discover just a few promising compounds from millions to tens of millions of candidate compounds (41). Various types of AI play active roles in processing this information, as described in detail later in this review.

Thus, in the treatment process, surgical robots are mainly being developed to make the operation more accurate and reduce the burden on the physician, while in the drug development process, AI is being used to process large quantities of information.

Follow-up

In medicine, no matter what type of disease or what type of treatment is given, follow-up is more or less always necessary. In addition, life expectancy in the world has increased by 20 years in the last 50 years, and as the population ages, the risk of having chronic diseases increases. Against this background, wearable devices equipped with AI that can constantly monitor health conditions and immediately detect any abnormality in wearers are actively being developed. In particular, wearable devices are expected to be used in cardiology, where the condition of the patient may change rapidly and there is a direct link with mortality status. In fact, more than half of the applications for follow-up approved by the FDA in 2017-2020, including the ECG app on the Apple™ Watch, are wearable cardiology devices (23,26). A number of the algorithms in wearable devices are applied artificial neural networks or adaptive algorithms (42).

In addition to the wearable devices, automated communication systems have also being introduced for follow-up. For example, Pharmabot was a chatbot developed in 2015 to assist in medication education for pediatric patients and their parents using a Left-Right parsing algorithm and Care Angel, which applied an automated voice dialogue system to check on the condition of the person requiring care, to detect abnormalities and to alert the caregiver to changes if necessary (43,44).

As aforementioned, AI-based applications are contributing to medicine in numerous ways. The characteristics of conventional medicine and AI-based medicine are summarized in Table II. In the current section, some examples of the applied AI-based applications have been introduced; however, it is difficult for AI-based medicine to classify diseases and symptoms that are still difficult to define, and to obtain the sense of security that is felt upon meeting a doctor or nurse directly. It would be possible to realize better medical care by solving the disadvantages of both and integrating the advantages of both.

Table II.

Comparison between conventional and computational medicine.

Medicine Conventional Computational
Diagnosis Doctors meet patients; patients are diagnosed using diagnostic equipment at the hospital; diagnostic accuracy depends on the experience of a doctor AI can detect lesions with the same or better accuracy than a skilled doctor; AI support is used to avoid misdiagnoses; AI supports the decision of the doctor by processing of the medical literature
Treatment Doctors perform surgery directly; doctors or nurses administer medications Robotics support doctors in surgery; devices automatically administer medications based on time and symptoms
Follow-up Doctors or nurses meet patients; patients are diagnosed using diagnostic equipment at a hospital Devices, such as those that are wearable, can detect abnormalities at a very early stage; the AI can consult with patients about their medical conditions and medications
Advantages Patients can meet their doctors and nurses; abstract expression is possible AI decreases the burden on doctors and nurses; AI responds quickly in an emergency
Problems The burden on doctors and nurses is heavy; sometimes it is not possible to respond immediately in an emergency The process of outputting the data is incomprehensible to humans. Application cost is high. AI cannot take responsibility for mistakes.

AI, artificial intelligence.

4. AI in drug development as a foundation for drug therapy

Medications used in pharmacotherapy are discovered from among millions to tens of millions of candidate compounds after long years of research and after a huge amount of money has been expended. To evaluate each candidate compound, a number of key pieces of information are required for evaluation, such as in vitro and in vivo pharmacological activity, safety, target specificity, pharmacokinetics, physical properties such as molecular weight and solubility, stability in the body and during storage, and development cost. Therefore, drug development sites always generate enormous amounts of information. Developers need to extract the important information from this in order to discover optimal compounds. Therefore, it is expected that AI would improve the accuracy and efficiency of developers in drug development. AI was introduced to the field of drug development earlier than to the medical field (45). In conventional drug development, developers propose hypotheses for the treatment of a disease and focus on a target that can be used to develop a therapeutic drug within the hypothesis; this is followed by drug development. However, this process might miss crucial therapeutic targets and drugs for various diseases. In AI-based drug development, AI can propose, and lead to the development of, important targets and candidate drugs for disease therapy (Table III). In particular, Watson is able to identify connections and relationships among diseases, drugs, genes and other factors, and can generate novel hypotheses by mining the scientific literature (28). This tool is useful not only for drug development, but also for drug repurposing. In addition, Watson is constantly and automatically updated. Automatic learning in AI is important, not only to decrease the effort involved, but also to create better methods to meet unmet needs in life sciences and medicine.

Table III.

Comparison between conventional and AI-based drug development.

Drug development Conventional AI-based
Driving factor Target-driven Data-driven
Targets Easily druggable targets with known structure and interactions in cells Meaningful targets extracted by machine learning using big data
Advantages It is easy for humans to understand identified targets and compounds. Saves time and money by predicting the activities and properties of compounds before synthesis; compounds that target un-druggable molecules may be identified
Problems Targets are limited by the complex and/or un-known structures and interactions; the identification of promising compounds is time consuming (numerous synthesis-evaluation cycles). A large amount of accurate data is necessary for learning; AI cannot understand whether compounds are meaningful for humans

AI, artificial intelligence.

AI-based drug development can save time and money. In conventional drug development, screening is performed using millions to tens of millions of compound libraries, followed by synthetic development based on the candidate compounds obtained from the screening and the re-evaluation of their activities to identify those with promise. However, numerous identified compounds do not exhibit physical properties and safety profiles that are suitable for pharmaceutical applications; therefore, other compounds are often re-synthesized. To avoid such time and money loss, AI-based drug development can predict the activity, physical properties and safety of each compound using computers. Various AI-based applications have been developed to predict these parameters (Figs. 2 and 3) (28,46-62). Furthermore, applications have been developed that predict not only the properties of individual compounds, but also suitable routes of synthesizing pharmacological reagents or therapeutic compounds (61,62). The cost of drug development has been decreased by these applications; however, the accuracy of the AI prediction of the compound properties is not sufficient and further improvement of this factor is necessary. In particular, AI-based applications have been actively developed as screening steps, which require time and money. However, it is difficult to predict the affinities between a target protein and compounds, for the following reasons: i) Difficulties in predicting protein flexibility; ii) ambiguity regarding the complexity of a protein in an actual environment, and iii) difficulties in assessing the solvent effects of an actual environment (63,64). To solve these problems, a number of experiments and new algorithms would be necessary.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) AI-based tools in the drug development flow. (B) Description of AI-based tools in each process. AI, artificial intelligence.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Perspectives for AI-based (A) medicine and (B) drug development. AI, artificial intelligence. ADMET, Absorption Distribution Metabolism Excretion Toxicity.

One of the most difficult steps in the process of drug development is the prediction of adverse effects. It has been reported that computational modeling using machine learning is useful for predicting adverse effects (65). Moreover, it is possible to manufacture synthetic patients and data artificially by analyzing existing data using machine learning techniques (66,67). As there are no ethical concerns regarding the privacy and costs of using synthetic data, this would be a powerful tool for clinical studies that require a large number of patients and may be an effective alternative for preparing training data for machine learning algorithms. These fields of research could be further enriched by AI in the near future and would also contribute to the realization of personalized precision medicine.

5. Perspectives for AI-based medicine and drug development

AI has been used for clinical purposes and drug development. However, the current AI-based applications are only being developed for specific applications at each stage of pharmacological or medical applications. In particular, AI-based applications with a high accuracy for diagnosis have actively been developed. However, a diagnosis is not determined based only on the result of one diagnostic method, and should be performed by comprehensively combining various types of information, such as chief complaints and physical findings; a system that integrates the various specific diagnostic data would be necessary in the future (Fig. 3A). If the disease remained unclear based only on the acquired information, the system would be a present a diagnostic method to determine the condition. The system would avoid missing information and improve the accuracy of the diagnosis. In addition, the system would not only be used for diagnosis, but also for monitoring the progress of treatment after surgery and drug therapy. At present, almost no AI-based application has been developed that predicts the therapeutic effect or proposes a therapeutic method. However, a system has been reported in basic research that predicts the sensitivity of anticancer agents and radiation therapy based on phase contrast image information (32,33). In the near future, AI may be able to predict the therapeutic effects of various therapeutic methods in advance and suggest an appropriate therapeutic method. Thus, clinical AI in the future should be a system that interprets and integrates various types of clinical information and considers the changes caused by each treatment, to promote the best flow toward the complete cure of the disease. In addition, by constantly collecting information on complaints and physical status, both inside and outside the hospital, AI systems should always support the ability of a patient to live without aggravating their condition.

In drug development, numerous specific AI-based applications are already in use. In particular, a number of applications for the simulation of the docking of compounds to target proteins have been developed (47-53). Moreover, in addition to having an excellent specific score (such as affinity for a target protein), a candidate compound needs to have comprehensive excellent safety and pharmacokinetics. Therefore, a system for identifying promising compounds by considering various characteristics, as well as learning specific scores, will be required in the future (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, in drug development, clinical trials impose a heavy financial and time burden. It is necessary to improve the efficiency of clinical trials by using portal devices, which configure and manage devices remotely over the network or via USB connection, and collecting and selecting applicable patients.

The most important key to solving the problems facing AI-based applications is making it possible for people to understand the judgment process of AI. AI-based clinical applications would be utilized in important aspects of future treatment decisions, such as the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment effectiveness. If the AI determination process is unclear, the medical staff could not evaluate the validity of the AI determination, which would lead to the distrust of AI. To solve the uncertainty of AI, ‘Explainable AI’ has been actively researched (68). The development of Explainable AI would be essential for the widespread use of AI-based applications in healthcare.

In addition, as AI-based healthcare would accumulate a greater amount of medical information than the current healthcare system, it would be necessary to prepare an infrastructure and security systems to handle large amounts of information. Futuristic clinical AI might monitor not only medical information, but also the tasks of patients and medical staff, and might forecast workflow bottlenecks.

As aforementioned, the implementation of AI could facilitate more accuracy and greater efficiency in various fields of healthcare; however, it has some issues and limitations. Both medical staff and developers would need to understand the issues and limitations, and then the coexistence of humans and AI could lead to better healthcare.

6. Conclusion

AI has evolved with the times and has been utilized in applications in drug development and healthcare. These applications are steadily producing results, and the use of AI is becoming established. The implementation of AI in society will need to overcome issues such as how to develop leading companies and train data scientists. However, company development may still face some obstacles, such as implementing AI, employment and cost. In the future, to improve human health, we should not only develop AI, but also think about the coexistence of humans with AI.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding Statement

Funding: This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (grant nos. 19K22658, 19K09172, 19K07688, 20H00541, 221S0002 and 21K19526) and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (grant no. 16cm0106414h0001). Partial support was received from the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund (2019).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

HI, MT and AV conceptualized the study. AA, MK and HI wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Institutional endowments were received partially from Hirotsu Bio Science Inc. (Tokyo, Japan), Kinshu-kai Medical Corporation (Osaka, Japan), IDEA Consultants, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan), Kyowa-kai Medical Corporation (Hyogo, Japan), Unitech Co., Ltd. (Chiba, Japan), Chugai Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).

References

  • 1.Santos DP, Baeßler B. Big data, artificial intelligence, and structured reporting. Eur Radiol Exp. 2018;2(42) doi: 10.1186/s41747-018-0071-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Akyazi T, Goti A, Oyarbide A, Alberdi E, Bayon F. A guide for the food industry to meet the future skills requirements emerging with industry 4.0. Foods. 2020;9(492) doi: 10.3390/foods9040492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Favaretto M, Shaw D, De Clercq E, Joda T, Elger BS. Big data and digitalization in dentistry: A systematic review of the ethical issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2495) doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Etienne H, Hamdi S, Le Roux M, Camuset J, Khalife-Hocquemiller T, Giol M, Debrosse D, Assouad J. Artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery: Past, present, perspective and limits. Eur Respir Rev. 2020;29(200010) doi: 10.1183/16000617.0010-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McCarthy J, Minsky ML, Rochester N, Shannon CE. A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine. 2006;27(12) [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Samuel AL. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J Res Dev. 1959;3:210–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wied GL, Bahr GF, Oldfield DG, Bartels PH. Computer-assisted identification of cells from uterine adenocarcinoma. A clinical feasibility study with TICAS. I. Measurements at wavelength 530 nm. Acta Cytol. 1968;12:357–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ishiyama T, Tsubura E, Hirao F, Yamamura Y, Takeda S, Tateisi K, Yamamoto M, Uemura M, Yaida K, Hayakawa F, et al. A study of the automation of cytodiagnosis. Med Biol Eng. 1969;7:297–306. doi: 10.1007/BF02474770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shortliffe EH, Axline SG, Buchanan BG, Merigan TC, Cohen SN. An artificial intelligence program to advise physicians regarding antimicrobial therapy. Comput Biomed Res. 1973;6:544–560. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(73)90029-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Miller RA, Pople HE, Myers JD. INTERNIST-1, An experimental computer-based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:478–486. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198208193070803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dechter R. Learning while searching in constraint-satisfaction-problems. In: Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Philadelphia, pp178-183, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.LeCun Y, Boser B, Denker JS, Henderson D, Howard RE, Hubbard W, Jackel LD. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Comput. 1989;1:541–551. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35:153–160. doi: 10.1109/10.1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jacobs LK, Shayani V, Sackier JM. Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:54–55. doi: 10.1007/s004649900294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: A comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology. 2001;58:893–898. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01423-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Weinstein GS, O'malley BW Jr, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery: Supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:1315–1319. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000170848.76045.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kurumbail RG, Stevens AM, Gierse JK, McDonald JJ, Stegeman RA, Pak JY, Gildehaus D, Miyashiro JM, Penning TD, Seibert K, et al. Structural basis for selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by anti-inflammatory agents. Nature. 1996;384:644–648. doi: 10.1038/384644a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Molnár L, Losonczy H. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571: New possibility in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Orv Hetil. 2002;143:2379–2384. (In Hu) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC. Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004;239:14–21. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hinton GE, Osindero S, The YW. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 2006;18:1527–1554. doi: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science. 2006;313:504–507. doi: 10.1126/science.1127647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Komura D, Ishikawa S. Machine learning approaches for pathologic diagnosis. Virchows Arch. 2019;475:131–138. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02594-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. American College of Radiology. Cleared AI Algorithms. 2021. https://models.acrdsi.org. Accessed July 1, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. U.S. Food and Drug Administration: FDA allows marketing of first whole slide imaging system for digital pathology. 2017. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-allows-marketing-first-whole-slide-imaging-system-digital-pathology. Accessed July 1, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mills AM, Gradecki SE, Horton BJ, Blackwell R, Moskaluk CA, Mandell JW, Mills SE, Cathro HP. Diagnostic efficiency in digital pathology: A comparison of optical versus digital assessment in 510 surgical pathology cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:53–59. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. The Medical Futurist: FDA-approved A.I.-based algorithms. 2021. https://medicalfuturist.com/fda-approved-ai-based-algorithms/. Accessed July 1, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Asai A, Koseki J, Konno M, Nishimura T, Gotoh N, Satoh T, Doki Y, Mori M, Ishii H. Drug discovery of anticancer drugs targeting methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 2. Heliyon. 2018;4(e01021) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Spangler S, Wilkins AD, Bachman BJ, Nagarajan M, Dayaram T, Haas P, Regenbogen S, Pickering CR, Comer A, Myers JN, et al. Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature. KDD'14: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining: 1877-1886, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Doyle-Lindrud S. Watson will see you now: A supercomputer to help clinicians make informed treatment decisions. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2015;19:31–32. doi: 10.1188/15.CJON.31-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tojo A. Clinical sequencing in leukemia with the assistance of artificial intelligence. Rinsho Ketsueki. 2017;58:1913–1917. doi: 10.11406/rinketsu.58.1913. (In Japanese) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, Thrun S. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115–118. doi: 10.1038/nature21056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Toratani M, Konno M, Asai A, Koseki J, Kawamoto K, Tamari K, Li Z, Sakai D, Kudo T, Satoh T, et al. A convolutional neural network uses microscopic images to differentiate between mouse and human cell lines and their radioresistant clones. Cancer Res. 2018;78:6703–6707. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yanagisawa K, Toratani M, Asai A, Konno M, Niioka H, Mizushima T, Satoh T, Miyake J, Ogawa K, Vecchione A, et al. Convolutional neural network can recognize drug resistance of single cancer cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(3166) doi: 10.3390/ijms21093166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tanos R, Tosato G, Otandault A, Al Amir Dache Z, Pique Lasorsa L, Tousch G, El Messaoudi S, Meddeb R, Assaf MD, Ychou M, et al. Machine learning-assisted evaluation of circulating DNA quantitative analysis for cancer screening. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2020;7(2000486) doi: 10.1002/advs.202000486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Im YR, Tsui DWY, Diaz LA Jr, Wan JCM. Next-generation liquid biopsies: Embracing data science in oncology. Trends Cancer. 2021;7:283–292. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Harada Y, Shimizu T. Impact of a Commercial Artificial Intelligence-Driven Patient Self-Assessment Solution on Waiting Times at General Internal Medicine Outpatient Departments: Retrospective Study. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8(e21056) doi: 10.2196/21056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, Setio AAA, Ciompi F, Ghafoorian M, van Der Laak JA, van Ginneken B, Sánchez CI. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2017;42:60–88. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Khosravi P, Kazemi E, Imielinski M, Elemento O, Hajirasouliha I. Deep convolutional neural networks enable discrimination of heterogeneous digital pathology images. EBioMedicine. 2018;27:317–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.12.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Meyer A, Zverinski D, Pfahringer B, Kempfert J, Kuehne T, Sündermann SH, Stamm C, Hofmann T, Falk V, Eickhoff C. Machine learning for real-time prediction of complications in critical care: A retrospective study. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:905–914. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30300-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Saeidi H, Opfermann JD, Kam M, Raghunathan S, Leonard S, Krieger A. A confidence-based shared control strategy for the smart tissue autonomous robot (STAR) Rep US. 2018;2018:1268–1275. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2018.8594290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brown N, Cambruzzi J, Cox PJ, Davies M, Dunbar J, Plumbley D, Sellwood MA, Sim A, Williams-Jones BI, Zwierzyna M, Sheppard DW. Big data in drug discovery. Prog Med Chem. 2018;57:277–356. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmch.2017.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vélez-Guerrero MA, Callejas-Cuervo M, Mazzoleni S. Artificial intelligence-based wearable robotic exoskeletons for upper limb rehabilitation: A review. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21(2146) doi: 10.3390/s21062146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Comendador B, Francisco B, Medenilla J, Nacion S, Serac T. Pharmabot: A pediatric generic medicine consultant chatbot. J Automat Control Eng. 2015;3:137–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wong V, Rosenbaum S, Sung W, Kaplan RM, Bott N, Platchek T, Milstein A, Shah NR. Caring for caregivers: bridging the gap between family caregiving policy and practice. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv. 2021;2 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, Kalyane D, Kalia K, Tekade RK. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26:80–93. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.AlQuraishi M. AlphaFold at CASP13. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:4862–4865. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang C, Zhang Y. Improving scoring-docking-screening powers of protein-ligand scoring functions using random forest. J Comput Chem. 2017;38:169–177. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Durrant JD, McCammon JA. NNScore 2.0: A neural-network receptor-ligand scoring function. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;51:2897–2903. doi: 10.1021/ci2003889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Feinberg EN, Sur D, Wu Z, Husic BE, Mai H, Li Y, Sun S, Yang J, Ramsundar B, Pande VS. PotentialNet for molecular property prediction. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4:1520–1530. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yasuo N, Sekijima M. Improved method of structure-based virtual screening via interaction-energy-based learning. J Chem Inf Model. 2019;59:1050–1061. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wallach I, Dzamba M, Heifets A. AtomNet: A deep convolutional neural network for bioactivity prediction in structure-based drug discovery. arXiv: 1510.02855, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Stork C, Chen Y, Šícho M, Kirchmair J. Hit dexter 2.0: Machine-learning models for the prediction of frequent hitters. J Chem Inf Model. 2019;59:1030–1043. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wójcikowski M, Zielenkiewicz P, Siedlecki P. Open drug discovery toolkit (ODDT): A new open-source player in the drug discovery field. J Cheminform. 2015;7(26) doi: 10.1186/s13321-015-0078-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rifaioglu AS, Nalbat E, Atalay V, Martin MJ, Cetin-Atalay R, Doğan T. DEEPScreen: High performance drug-target interaction prediction with convolutional neural networks using 2-D structural compound representations. Chem Sci. 2020;11:2531–2557. doi: 10.1039/c9sc03414e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Xu Y, Ma J, Liaw A, Sheridan RP, Svetnik V. Demystifying multitask deep neural networks for quantitative structure-activity relationships. J Chem Inf Model. 2017;57:2490–2504. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Awale M, Reymond JL. Polypharmacology Browser PPB2: Target prediction combining nearest neighbors with machine learning. J Chem Inf Model. 2019;59:10–17. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Duvenaud DK, Maclaurin D, Iparraguirre J, Bombarell R, Hirzel T, Aspuru-Guzik A, Adams RP. Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints. In: Advances in neural information processing systems 28. NIPS Foundation, Montreal. 2015;2:2224–2232. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Putin E, Asadulaev A, Ivanenkov Y, Aladinskiy V, Sanchez-Lengeling B, Aspuru-Guzik A, Zhavoronkov A. Reinforced adversarial neural computer for de novo molecular design. J Chem Inf Model. 2018;58:1194–1204. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Olivecrona M, Blaschke T, Engkvist O, Chen H. Molecular de-novo design through deep reinforcement learning. J Cheminform. 2017;9(48) doi: 10.1186/s13321-017-0235-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mayr A, Klambauer G, Unterithiner T, Hochreiter S. DeepTox: Toxicity prediction using deep learning. Front Environ Sci. 2016;3(80) [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Steiner S, Wolf J, Glatzel S, Andreou A, Granda JM, Keenan G, Hinkley T, Aragon-Camarasa G, Kitson PJ, Angelone D, Cronin L. Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language. Science. 2019;363(eaav2211) doi: 10.1126/science.aav2211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Coley CW, Rogers L, Green WH, Jensen KF. SCScore: Synthetic complexity learned from a reaction corpus. J Chem Inf Model. 2018;58:252–261. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Antunes DA, Devaurs D, Kavraki LE. Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015;10:1301–1313. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2015.1094458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Uehara S, Tanaka S. AutoDock-GIST: Incorporating thermodynamics of active-site water into scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking. Molecules. 2016;21(1604) doi: 10.3390/molecules21111604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jamal S, Ali W, Nagpal P, Grover S, Grover A. Computational models for the prediction of adverse cardiovascular drug reactions. J Transl Med. 2019;17(171) doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1918-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Walonoski J, Kramer M, Nichols J, Quina A, Moesel C, Hall D, Duffett C, Dube K, Gallagher T, McLachlan S. Synthea: An approach, method, and software mechanism for generating synthetic patients and the synthetic electronic health care record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25:230–238. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Choi E, Biswal S, Malin B, Duke J, Stewart WF, Sun J. Generating multi-label discrete patient records using generative adversarial networks. PMLR. 2017;68:286–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S. Explainable AI: A Review of Machine Learning Interpretability Methods. Entropy (Basel) 2021;23(18) doi: 10.3390/e23010018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES